Very good got better...Tecnifibre TF40 Review (2024)

[@hybrid11theory75]

Full price for basically a cosmetic update is absolute waste. Also why they don't offer buttcaps with trap door and no different grip shapes is a big NO for me. Companies are too stubborn these days... -.-

[@jerome_morrow]

Lack of a trapdoor is just unacceptable these days. Especially with the QC lottery.

[@agradina]

they dont make buttcaps because they dont alowed the foam to get exposed to air every time a noob want to open it.There is science behind racquets and integrity of racquets must be maintained so move ur preference to holow racquets if u wanted to open the buttcap.

[@hybrid11theory75]

@@agradina Never heard so much BS in a single comment... you have absolute no clue what you're talking about. "Because they don't allow the foam to be exposed" LMFAO, there are tons of other foam filled racquets with trap doors...

[@jerome_morrow]

@@agradina Wow! Who knew the internal foam of a TF racket is hermetically sealed off?! Those airtight grommets must have cost a fortune to develop. LMAO. Even so, it’s hardly a major slog to leave the bottom 1 inch of the hairpin hollow so that some rebalancing weight can be easily added. Incidentally, how does a TF pro-stock hairpin work if there’s no space in the handle for silicone?

[@klauswinzig4997]

A foam racket will never find the way to my bags

[@daniel10s]

Love the feel of tecnifibre racquets, but have never been able to use that grip shape. Hope they update them some day. Too many good racquets these days to have to deal with customizing the grip.

[@tberry79]

Yeah, I think Babolat has the best grip type (for me at least)

[@randrothify]

Sounds exactly like what I am looking for which was a Blade 16x19 with more power. The head shape looks a little strangely not quite symmetrical which is something that I like o Wilson frames and will have to adjust to, but otherwise looks good. I can’t figure out for the life of me why Wilson or Head can’t make a modern control frame in a 98 head size with a bit more pop. It’s as if your choices are mutually exclusive: wet noodle control frame or power/spin frame at 100 square inches.

[@Tennisnerd]

Yeah, stiffer control racquets are my kind of jam, the RF01 from Wilson is good and the Radical MP is not bad in that respect either, to be fair.

[@jamsjerfy]

great to see this! JUST got a used version of the last model OF the 315 cheaply in the meal, and i’m excited to try it out. coming from a pure aero 300 (weighted up to 340), which i like, but have always dreamed of playing a TF. loved my days with the pure aero 98, so i thought “for about $100 strung, why not?” thank you for all the content, but especially for pointing that the last iteration was also solid.

[@BurnsTennis]

Jonas. I've been watching your videos for a few years now. Your footwork and stroke production has really improved. More smooth stroke production too. Nice work.

[@Tennisnerd]

Thanks!

[@foodandtennisislife]

good to see you back on court 1!

[@Tennisnerd]

Home court :) hope all is well, Tom!

[@elmtree97]

I was a Volkl player that moved to TF40 315 18M.. I'm used to rectangular pallets with no trapdoor. Switching to the 1st Gen TF40 305 16M soon.

[@JoxAtienza]

i currently have the TF40 18x20 305 (2022 version). I love it! what's a better upgrade: stick to the 18x20 2024 version or go with this 16x19?

[@RyanSheppard]

edit: you mentioned there's no trap door. On my TF40 I had to drive nails into the foam in the handle to add weight. You have to take off the whole butt cap to do that

[@nitiphoomphookritsana7958]

I have tf40 2022 and i considered to buy prince ats textreme 98 or the new one tf40, Which one do you recommend more?

[@erikvo3232]

TF 40 305 vs radical mp vs blade 98 16x19? What do u prefer?

[@oakmountaingod]

Been waiting on this one!

[@Tennisnerd]

Worth waiting for

[@MarcO-q7t5x]

Hi , another great review ! my question is : best racquets for a heavy flat hitter ? (i like to play power shots but super flat , expecially with forehand) I've seen lots of rewiew and I think Dunlop Cx 400 tour 2021 (that has a denser string pattern in the sweetspot than 2024) might be the right choice . What do you think ? There are other racquets that i should consider in that range (98-100 sq.head, and 295-310g unstrung) ? I've seen also Head Gravity Mp XL but maybe is too low in stiffness

[@vwmusicplaylist1935]

The extremely rectangular handle shape is a complete deal breaker irrespective of how good the racquet might be.

[@bibou929]

How different is the feel from the previous version ? I am worried about the 66 Ra

[@Tennisnerd]

Quite similar, did not feel any discomfort, but always a good idea not to string too high in terms of tension

[@JosephYoYo]

Where can we find mold info for a specific racket? For example, which Radical MP models came with a mold change?

[@Tennisnerd]

This is a great question, Tennis Warehouse usually alerts about mold changes in the product info.

[@ArturAndriasian-TennisOn]

What you think about TF 40 305 16x19(2022)? I try to choose between 16x19 and 18x20 tf 40 305. Is it controllable power on previous model 2022? I know that swingweight was so small..

[@stevenhowie4219]

Don't know why more people don't talk about the 315g version more. It's a great racket and much more head light which is great for one hand backhand.

[@samburrell3288]

I had the T-Fight, I played great with it, it was like a sledgehammer but it destroyed my elbow, once I stopped playing with it, the pain stopped too

[@brandomaxwell]

Another informative review! One question: at 4:10 you comment the mold seems the same as the last gen. If this one's constant beam is 21.7mm vs. the last one's 22mm, doesn't that suggest a new mold?

[@Tennisnerd]

I think sometimes they round of the beam measurements, but if there was a mold update, it must have been very slight, and there has been no mention of it from Tecnifibre or retailers. So it is minimal, if any.

[@brandomaxwell]

Yes, that makes sense. They wouldn't be the 1st racquet maker to do such rounding. And, PS, I dig how you ALWAYS get into the specs and how they combine to affect the feel on-court. Thanks!

[@steveurmah]

I'm playing the older TF40 16x19 and obviously like it. But one issue I have to warn about is that the quality control for my four frames was quite a big issue. One was goldilocks, two were very light (fixable) and one was unplayable for me with a super high swingweight.

[@Tennisnerd]

Yeah, this is the issue with foam-filled racquets, swing weights can be all over the place.

[@paulobraz6117]

Diadem Elevate V3 or TF40 16x19. Which do you prefer? Which provides better comfort, control and precision?

[@Tennisnerd]

TF40, the muted feel of the Diadem and some lack of power makes me choose the Tec. Comfort is similar

[@LuisLunaTarazon]

How does this racket compare to the Solinco Whiteout 305 16x19? On paper, this is the closest thing I've seen to that racket. My Whiteout came in way overspec with a 340 swingweight, but I don't mind that at all. My biggest problem is the launch angle. Are there any issues with the launch angle on the new TF40s?

[@Tennisnerd]

I felt like the TF40 is similar in many ways, but I never felt betrayed by the string bed while I did notice some hot spots on the Whiteout...

[@beam8544]

Something that I think you should talk about when reviewing rackets is how easily the grommets are replaceable. A super important feature in my opinion

[@Tennisnerd]

Good point, and thanks to the eyelets, these racquets are joy to string

[@raytrace2014]

Hight swingweights on stock frames are very problematic. If you get an overspec one it becomes basically unplayable and you can't fix it. Brands should give us low swingweight frames that we can add weight to. They could even supply lead tape and instructions on how to do it to make clear to consumers that you should tune the racquet to your taste.

[@kkarx]

Absolutely! I got Speed Pro with SW 340 and it is killing my shoulder.

[@johnbrondum]

Another great review! A minor point of feedback, and maybe it is just me, but I find the leafy background can distract from the racquet. The new Prince racquets (with the camo paint job) would disappear completely 😂

[@Tennisnerd]

I do like it, but I get your point!

[@thebeat]

I already got the 18 x 20 because of your review of it a couple years ago. And now I will get the 16 x 19.

[@Tennisnerd]

They are good bats!

[@JoxAtienza]

pls let me know how it feels. i too have the 18x20 2022 305g. thinking if i should switch to 16x19

[@TheTennisDaddy]

As a fellow crazy racquet guy, I might have to purchase this racquet, 13 racquets this year but my ocd tells me I need an even number to see out the year😉😂And I’ve never tried a Technifibre..I also always preferred 18x20 but really like the feel of the Extreme Tour/Pro with the dense 16x19 too

[@Tennisnerd]

I know the feels

[@googlereviewer1944]

Can Nicky Roen supply normal shaped pallets for these?

[@allainangcao28]

Swingweights should be standardized to be lower stock due to quality control issues and customization purposes. Rarely do players nowadays use a racket and not customize to their specs.

[@micah2237]

hmm, these specs are exactly the same as the solinco whiteout now...🤔 heard they were made in the same factory too. are these just the same racquet but different string density for the mains?

[@tberry79]

Could be. I wouldn’t be surprised if there are rackets out there that are only cosmetic in difference.

[@abcd-fs2de]

I like the grip from the Tecnifibre the most.

[@ivandean1]

don't like the handles on TF. Too square

[@bodzislawfakjutu]

the best grip shape goes to... Wilson! v8 blade 100 ;)

[@matiasrivas5567]

I just dont see this new models at the TW website. Do you??

[@Tennisnerd]

No, strangely only in Europe right now

[@kimlucas9005]

How does it compare to t fight 305 ?

[@Tennisnerd]

Softer, longer dwell time in the string bed, lower SW

[@peejread2309]

How does it compare to the pure aero 98?

[@Tennisnerd]

Less power, more control. Lower launch angle

[@christianbuechi4555]

where‘s the tweener at 3:33 my friend?

[@Tennisnerd]

Not talented enough :)

[@christianbuechi4555]

@@Tennisnerd so humble

[@cesarelodesani1384]

Volkl racquets too don't have trapdoor

[@Tennisnerd]

Yes, you are right and they also have a quite rectangular grip

[@jeroenfrijhoff8392]

Nice review! Once I noticed it though, it was difficult to look past your shirt logo that’s missing an ‘r’ 😬

[@Tennisnerd]

This was a bit of an easter egg :D

[@tvs813]

Please drop the sad jazz music

[@dejantetickovic4478]

Not everyone hates jazz. ;)

[@googlereviewer1944]

Flat handle shape is a no no👎

[@xPocketStaff]

Tecnifibre T-fight 2024 ?thx

[@Tennisnerd]

I think next year

[@curiousgeorge6921]

Angel or this ?

[@meinsouza]

tecnifibre has been pushing out great rackets lately

[@Tennisnerd]

Agreed

[@Christiancsilva13]

Had a pair of the 2019 version. Loved it and played so well with it, but it wrecked my wrist 😢. Foam filled rackets really put up some extra weight in the frame and it feels heavier than the swingweight suggests.

[@christophmayer2434]

I would never ever buy a racket without a trap door. But i played the old TF0 for testing and i kind of liked it. just sad that they do such a stupid thing.

[@samburrell3288]

tecnifibre grips are too round like a sausage. The best ones are wilson, babolat and yonex. Head is also too round

[@klauswinzig4997]

A foam racket will never find the way to my bags

[@tberry79]

Why not? I’m genuinely curious because I’ve never tried one, but I’ve considered it. What do you dislike about them?

[@klauswinzig4997]

@@tberry79 imo the muted feeling and the risk, that this material has been uneven, unbalanced injected.

[@danielsteck]

Nice raquet... but shit quality control... specs are all over the place for those.... good for the bin

[@a1993d]

no dicdots

[@Tennisnerd]

It is a sign of health