Insane 2000m Shot with AX338 from Mile High Shooting

[@VickersTacticalLAV]

Thanx everybody - another great trip to Gunsite !!! Thanx to all who made it happen and Mile High Shooting Accessories in particular !!

[@ONEILLOPS]

***** Larry, have you guy's ever thought of getting into a few hunting scenario's?

[@ONEILLOPS]

***** Just because you push a lighter projo faster does not mean it will stay supersonic longer. By increasing velocity you increase drag, by decreasing projectile weight, you also decrease BC, both of which have immense impact on bullet flight at long ranges. It may apply to certain rounds, but not to all rounds.

[@ONEILLOPS]

***** Are you familiar with the .338 or worked personally with the caliber? I've opted out of the 250's and use the 300 OTM's with great success out to 2k+, I agree, a longer barrel for this specific application is better, simply for velocity purposes, but from first hand experience I wouldn't give up the 300's to use the 250's just to push them faster.

[@VickersTacticalLAV]

Gotta say we had a great time and it's always great to work with pros like Walt and Frank !!!

[@mincetea6923]

You have to calculate the earths rotation 🤣🤣

[@kiwi_comanche]

Brilliant shooting. I never get tired of seeing stuff like this. Cheers!!

[@7071t6]

any of you guys went to bersly England for the international f class comps at all ?

[@thiscouldntblowmore]

Larry keeps delivering tier 1 content. Right on.

[@truebornsonofliberty554]

Larry, that is CRAZY IMPRESSIVE!!!!! I'm inspired to take that shot with my 9" 300blk. I figure my holdover is about 600 meters, lol

[@alanfairhurst3033]

Great British engineering combined with a top notch shooter

[@MyScotty7]

The best sniper rifle on the planet! Amazing gun and marksmanship!

[@kdbdw28]

Wish we could see what the shooters scope see's. Great show still. Thanks Larry

[@jamesrelinski8853]

Damn impressive. Anyone who's fired at a quarter of that distance knows how though it really is. Pure awesomeness.

[@davidcruz8667]

As a trained DMR with a tricked-out M21 ( M-14 variant), my best shots hover around the 1000 meter line with a 7X20 power Mil-dot scope on average, my preferred magnification is 14 power, and I shoot better when I'm "feeling" my dope adjustments after the initial range and windage calculations. Practice, practice, practice. 2000 meter shots are nice to watch, gives me some inspiration. Of course, I don't have the luxury of picking optimal environmental factors, I almost always have to factor in uphill/downhill shots, elevation, temperature, multiple crosswinds, coriolis, weather; nature's always messing with me so I've turned into quite the seat of my pants shooter. My rifle is not as accurate as that .338 Lapua rig, so it sometimes amazes me that it can perform as well as it has sometimes. Love it.

[@danielmarshall4587]

I enjoy these vids... especially the time of flight. Tacking the shot to the hit on the target.

[@QuietMikeW]

The bullet Goes up 170ft above the target, that’s so crazy

[@paulclarke4776]

WOW...... Explaining how far the shooter has to aim to hit the target at these distances is awsome!! After hearing the Sgt. Major talk about how the wind at these heights r unknown?? Could be R&D guys at firearm optic company's not try and develop some kinda spotter scope that could 'see' the wind??? 🤔🤔👍 Great clip by the way!!! Accuracy International... British engineering at its best!! 🇬🇧

[@codyhernandez1164]

Amazing rifle! Wish I could send a few rounds through it. I do have to have to say tho, I made a 2200M(Dope not combat) shot with my XM2010 during my OFE 11-12 tour. Not trying to one up just proud of that one. ;)

[@jakewalden771]

Good One Code

[@maristoldboys5466]

Good on ya Cody #1shot1kill

[@markkuman4673]

Insane awesome. Respect from Papua New Guinea!

[@craig4fsu]

Incredible gear and shooting.

[@nbates9893]

Impressive. Great shooting. Ideally you hit your intended target with the first shot. Especially in a real world scenario with a human target...but that's tough and a lot of times luck...even at these ridiculous distances. Would have been nice to see him hit it with the second round...but we'll chalk that up to the wind. It became evident that the wind was gusting up after that miss that was very wide right. All in all very impressive. Those accuracy international rifles have always been a cut above the rest in my opinion...this footage is a perfect example of why. If the shooter does his part those rifles will always do there's. Thanks for the great footage LV!

[@ONEILLOPS]

I would like to know what projo you guys used for the .338, and the speed you were pushing it.

[@SHLowlight]

The gun was originally zeroed with the 250 Scenars, and then on that morning we shot the 300gr Scenars instead, they were only going 2750fps, it was 31 Mils @ 2000m, and if I remember right, 21 Mils @ 1760 (we started at 18 according to the computer)

[@1Grizzman]

Good stuff guys! Always love to see the envelope get pushed with the 338 Lapua!

[@nbates9893]

Such an impressive and reliable round man. By far my favorite for long distance.

[@PrecisionRifleGuy]

Glad I found this video. Excellent

[@audiogod2929]

Wow what a shoot! Great job guys...

[@Ryanralston07]

Did anyone else see the antelope at 8:27?

[@H43339]

Yes something was running right to left could have been a antelope ?

[@magikkris]

not a single word on Coriolis effects for that long distance shoot ? isn't it as important as wind and other parameters for such long shoot ?

[@EnkeiTenjin]

Because they weren't crunching numbers at unknown distances. Once you know the distance, dial and/or hold for that range based on your dope. Once you spot your miss, adjust accordingly. The key factor here is spotting that miss... This nullifies the need to care for Coriolis effect. Superfluous calculation. However, when engaging a target at 2000m, to aid is first shot hits, Coriolis should be considered. This was just in a different setting and it wasn't a big deal to miss 1st shot anyway.

[@cardiffpicker1]

Not really as the Coriolis and Eötvös effect depending on direction of shot are a constant where as wind ,air pressure,humidity can vary greatly offer 2000m so become much greater issues .

[@deeremeyer1749]

@@EnkeiTenjin Doesn't "consideration" of the mythical Coriolis effect depend on which "direction" you're shooting? If "Coriolis effect" is due to rotation of the Earth, it should only be a factor when shooting perpendicular to the Earth's rotation. Meaning shooting North to South or vice versa. Not East to West or vice versa. Correct? And where are the "correction" formulas for "Coriolis effect"? You do know that the supposed "evidence" for "Coriolis effect" - water swirling arpund drains in "opposite" directions in the Northern and Southern hemispheres - is complete bullshit, right? As well it should be since the Earth still rotates "west to east" in BOTH HEMISPHERES. And that "artillery" ballistics and correction for "Corolis effect" AND it's small arms "co-myth" called "spin drift" are factors for "artillery" at "long range" only because of the projectiles being "iron" shells filled with LESS DENSE "explosives" and therefore "hollow" compared to "copper" jacketed lead- and/or steel-cored small-arms bullets which have maximum density at their "cores" and which are not "hollow" and which fly only at "low level" in parabolas while "artillery" shells exit the "troposphere" and fly in or closer to actual "arcs" and can land "vertically" rather "horizontally" and in the case of naval "artillery" where guns on one ship fire at another ship both the gun and the target are always "moving", right? And that as up to 2700-lb. "iron" projectiles fired from large "iron" guns and "vehicles" over "land" or "sea" the "shells" themselves are influenced by the Earth's magnetic fields which like ocean currents or wind are constantly variable AND are affected by "weather" just like ocean water and atmospheric air currents. So that ultimately "artillery" and the forces that affect it are not automatically comparable and applicable and measurable and existential for "long range" or "extreme long range" shooting on dry land with non-ferrous projectiles fired from and to "unmoving" fixed positions? That's REALITY and it's why "Coriolis effect" and "spin-drift" MIGHT affect "artillery" including tank main guns or mortars at similar distances to what are shot in "ELR" shooting but are COMPLETE BULLSHIT FOR "SMALL-BORE" RIFLES FIRING LIGHTWEIGHT, NON-FERROUS JACKETED OR "SOLID" BULLETS AT "SIMILAR" VELOCITIES TO "ARTILLERY" ACCELERATING THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF TIMES MORE "MASS" TO SIMILAR SPEEDS IN A SIMILAR TIME-FRAME IN ORDER TO "STABILIZE" RELATIVELY "HOLLOW" PROJECTILES. SO-CALLED "ELR" SHOOTERS BY AND LARGE ARE BALLISTICALLY CLUELESS TO BEGIN WITH OR THEY WOULDN'T BE SO DEDICATED TO "SMALL-BORE" RIFLES AND WOULDN'T BE STUPID ENOUGH TO BELIEVE A ".50 BMG" CARTRIDGE/BULLET WITH A "B.C." IN EXCESS OF "1.000" AND A MUZZLE ENERGY OF 14,000+ LB.-FT. IS SOMEHOW "INFERIOR" TO A "SMALL-BORE" SUB-.50-CALIBER CARTRIDGE/BULLET WITH A "B.C." WELL BELOW "1.000" AND WELL UNDER HALF AS MUCH MUZZLE ENERGY. IF "B.C." IS A MEASURE OF "ENERGY EFFICIENCY", WHICH IT IS, AND "MORE IS BETTER" , WHICH IT IS, AND ONE BULLET WITH A SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER B.C. ALSO HAS AT LEAST DOUBLE THE ENERGY, ITS GOING TO FLY ONE FUCK OF A LOT "FARTHER" AND "FLATTER" BECAUSE "B.C." IS ONLY "MEASURED" FOR "ROUNDS" BY TEST-FIRING THEM IN THE FIRST PLACE. A BULLET HAS A "B.C." OF "ZERO" SITTING IN A BOX. AND THE B.C. "FORMULA" WAS DEVELOPED USING THE BIGGEST, BADDEST "COMMERCIAL" CARTRIDGE AND "ROUNDS" THE "BALLISTICIANS" COULD GET THEIR HANDS ON. .50 BMG. But let the SMALL-BORE WANNABE "SNIPERS" JACK AROUND WITH THEIR LITTLE "HUNTING RIFLES" TRYING TO GET INFERIOR, LIGHTWEIGHT, UNDERPOWERED BULLETS AND CARTRIDGES WITH WAY SUB-1.000 B.C.S AND LESS THAN HALF "LOW PRESSURE" .50 BMG ENERGY TO FLY AS FAR AND FAST AND "STABLE" AS .50 BMG. JUST LEAVES MORE NEW AND ONCE-FIRED AND SURPLUS AND PULLDOWN BULLETS AND CASES AND POWDER AND PRIMERS FOR THE SMART "ELR" SHOOTERS SO WE CAN KEEP LOADING "PRACTICE" AMMO FOR $1-$1.50 PER ROUND.

[@demizer1968]

Can you imagine what Gunny Hathcock with today's rifles. The man used a standard M2 with a jerry rigged scope to hit an enemy at 2k+ yards. Put one of these in his hands and he could do miracles.

[@maristoldboys5466]

He could circumcise flies and mosquitoes with one.

[@montatharhayder]

Amazing video

[@DonnyB]

Wow! that was incredible!

[@TheLamb6vt]

Great video!

[@markandrewgriggs2294]

I live about 40 minutes from Mile High Shooting here in Colorado. I almost fainted when I came home and learned that Larry Vickers is their spokesman. Holy crap! Also, what's the XLR class they're speaking of? Is that here in Colorado? I'd certainly pay to take a precision rifle class..

[@BillWa]

Carlos Hathcock, 2500 metre, fifty cal BMG Ma Deuce. Not slamming the shooter, those were fantastic shots, and I am envious. I'm in favor of gun control. The tighter the group, the better.

[@paulschalkham4940]

1000m I'm pretty sure

[@KB956]

Love the video!

[@Stag15L]

Awesome stuff .. what gloves are those you're wearing L.A.V. ?

[@mrsickwick]

Pig gloves, seriously best (shooting) gloves money can buy. www.skdtac.com/PIG-Full-Dexterity-Tactical-FDT-Alpha-Glove-p/pig.700.htm

[@slick4401]

Death From Afar has a helium touch to his voice.

[@gRosh08]

Hey Walt is spotting!

[@TT-dz8zf]

Am I hearing it wrong or there's a Swarovski spotting scope that goes out to 700x magnification?@2:00

[@geoffreyschell3518]

Combined with the phones magnification. Scope is prolly only a 60 or 80 power. The phone just magnifies it again. That's why the image quality went down so much.

[@daltonlafontaine9581]

Buy why you using a silencer? Doesn't that decrease velocity and range?

[@championdger]

That suppressor sounded stupid effective, what was it like on your end.

[@simonmp7]

Great shooting

[@ddaley87]

Did anyone notice the dude scoping himself on the first shot. And his left eye! Then he added like 3” of eye relief and shot with his right eye.

[@ironheadfm]

Does the suppressor have any influence on shell velocity, range or precision?

[@jcfrompoly]

ironheadfm A suppressor in theory reduces the noise of the rifle firing by dissipating some the gases that escape with the projectile, reducing the speed of the bullet to a subsonic velocity (or with a rifle as powerful as this .338 Lapua Magnum AX338, as close to subsonic as the suppressor on it can achieve XD). So yes, it slows the shell velocity. This also directly translates to a noticeable decrease in the effective range of the weapon, and the shooter having to hold higher than he normally would to hit a target at long range than a weapon with no suppressor to account for the increase in bullet drop. Finally, a reduced bullet velocity will mean that it takes a longer time for the projectile to reach the target, which in turn translates to a higher margin for error when engaging a target with a suppressed weapon, due to the delay. So yes, precision is affected. Significantly. Hope this helps, and sorry for my long-windednessXD

[@ironheadfm]

Jon Chua Thank you for the detailed and instructive answer, mate.

[@jcfrompoly]

No problem at all, glad that I was able to help! :)

[@Len_M.]

A suppressor does not slow a round down to subsonic speed, that is asinine. You have to fire subsonic rounds if you want the full effect of a suppressor otherwise they are still going to crack when they break the sound barrier. In the vid you can hear him say the round they were using was going transonic at 1900m, meaning dropping under the speed of sound.

[@jcfrompoly]

***** Thanks for the clarification! :)

[@brucej.3168]

Great video. Very informative. But you really should have taken out that jackrabbit that was bouncing around in the background :) lol. He was asking for it don't you think?

[@mpow3r972]

Damn, that rifles about taller than Frank lol Can't argue with that shooting though!

[@TheBaioken]

what is the muzzle velocity on this gun, about 850 m/s? Anybody knows more or less the average speed of the bullet on the whole 2000m? Or how long it takes to hit the target?

[@sirinatR]

about 4 s

[@planespotterEDDH]

Great Video! What type of ammunition do you use? I think .50 BMG or .338 Lapua?

[@sirinatR]

338 Lapua

[@parraeels1990]

How does adjusting the scope change the direction of the bullet? I don't get it. Someone please educate me

[@Nucl3arDude]

Moe Joe It allows hit to adjust his point of aim, essentially, as it gets out further, the front of the scope can dip so that when he aims on a target at that range, he's actually pointing the barrel up in a parabolic arc. Left and right similarly to compensate for windage, Coriolis etc. He also had to actually hold his point of aim off target at the end because the optic wouldn't adjust far enough. That's why many optics have mildots as well to allow you to eyeball the point of aim adjustment.

[@heynando]

what if you used a longer barrel? like twice the size, would it be easier to hit a 2km shot or the result would be the same?

[@SHLowlight]

The length of the barrel was not the issue, it was a case of MV it was slow for that bullet. Plus we had no dope prior to these shots. We zeroed the gun at 100 and went straight to 1 mile with nothing tried in-between, it can be done easier but takes a lot more time and effort beforehand.

[@ValueofLiberty]

SHLowlight It's nice to see what reality is as far as shooting targets at extreme range like this. I'd also like to see what you guys can do at these ranges with a gun and ammo combo that you are already familiar with and have dope for.

[@unitedgray]

The ideal barrel length ensures that all the powder is burnt, and the maximum velocity is reached. If the barrel is longer than that, you won't see any appreciable differences, and in fact you may see a decrease in velocity and/or accuracy.

[@heynando]

unitedgray hmm, very interesting, thanks for clearing that out!

[@fjn667]

Sick, only thing i can say. 2km hit is crazy

[@flyagaric1607]

not sure about the edit, but does anyone know the speed of that bullet. per hour

[@valkyries-mi2sx]

Just a warm up for mark and sam afterwork

[@paulclarke4776]

So using a suppressor doesn't alter muzzle velocity????

[@borkwoof696]

It can increase mv

[@mickwrath4425]

That is a very difficult shot, I would have liked to see you engage the target as if it were a soft hostile and get that firing solution calculated finely. First shot would have been very difficult but amazing, plus it woulda saved you guys some cash haha. Not that it matters with a rig like that. Great shooting guys!

[@youjnj]

2000 meters!!! 2km!!! that is a long way out there ...

[@xof711]

.375 CheyTac is your answer son!

[@Whitehawkvisionfilms]

whats the can?

[@gu1016]

What is the moisture coming off the suppressor?

[@whyarewestillherejusttosuf5964]

probably water they used to cool it down

[@sik59rt]

3/4" @2000m? Wow

[@DFOOSKING]

No 3/4 minute...as in MOA. Multiply your number by roughly 23.

[@maxsmith8463]

The advertisements have ruined youtube

[@Finalsuspect1468]

That's insane.

[@rushyahr7767]

LOL, normally Larry keeps a straight face... NOT THIS TIME! That was pretty epic though.

[@wewe745]

bro you the best

[@teddy_awdB19]

Wow! Impressive!

[@davec5153]

Surely the next step in sniping is taking the rifle out of the hands of the sniper and introducing some kind of secure light weight stand. So that human micro movements are eliminated.

[@yoshiakihiyama8486]

did hot and cold air play prism trick on you ? like bow fishing ? how shooter figure out to compensate less than micro click ? one shooter to another --just curiouse

[@cherrybacon9790]

That victim must be very very patient to be actually hurt...

[@paulm2467]

A British sniper shot 3 consecutive shots killing 2 machine gunners and destroying their machine gun at 2,475m in 2009, he had 6 ranging shots and then used 3 consecutive shots to kill the 2 gunners and destroy their gun, he used the military version of this rifle, if you aren’t aware of it’s capabilities it’s lethal.

[@TheBic4]

Simo Hahya could do 1000 meter shots with his iron sight mosin nagant.

[@everettm.almond1169]

good Instructional but with out sound it leaves something to be desired ! ---When I was in National Guard many Years ago late 50's till 65 Qualified Marksman at 300 + yards. but was denied longer ranges to fire on targets at Camp Roberts California. ---

[@lw8249]

Best than his predecessor L115A?

[@helimad100]

Why does your shooter go for a windage correction every time he's asked to dial elevation?

[@rushyahr7767]

Got to love a rifle that has to be shot at 2000 meters for it to be interesting. I guess anything under 1000 meters is just too easy, huh?

[@Silent_Productions]

Why is he wearing gloves?

[@m4x1170]

a lot of us train with gloves on and its important when shooting that you're doing the things you always do. also some gloves like these are set so your trigger finger pad will feel its in the same place every time and will grip the trigger blade nicely causing a good clean trigger break. some people don't like using gloves which is perfectly fine but for those who do use them it adds to the muscle memory of always using them. personal preference but if its cold out then it keep the feeling in the fingers so they don't go numb

[@guymetdrapedes220]

OSHA

[@moseserebosplasmaboots7988]

Would a shot from this distance penetrate the body?

[@thirdballattack]

Daniel, 338 Lapua at 2000 yds is hitting about twice as hard as a 9mm pistol from point blank range.

[@uracockfag101]

IDK why but the way you answered his question was hilarious. True as well.

[@moseserebosplasmaboots7988]

:o

[@Greendragon420able]

Impressive!

[@scottwallace3549]

Man I'd like to try that.

[@lotfitriaa4190]

J'en veux une avec tout ses accessoires maintenant et quand je dit maintenant c'est maintenant et vive l'Amérique et vive la couronne britannique

[@adhd_with_pennies4867]

See buddies this is why ballistic calculators are for when ur going far out and u need better shots the first time because ur trajectory is not planned

[@deeremeyer1749]

So a NightFarce Beast has the elevation adjustment knob on the side? Hilarious.

[@maristoldboys5466]

Cool story!

[@ddaley87]

Lol he must have it installed 90 degrees off

[@H43339]

@@ddaley87 you can't mount it 90 degrees off.

[@H43339]

No why do you say or think that ?

[@bolawdean]

Awesome vid, I'd rather see LAV take the shot though

[@matthewmaret2048]

Amazing

[@SteveFisherTattoos]

Looks like they hit the dirt before the targets. Not really a hit if it's a ricochet. Awesome vid too

[@Ryzomadman]

Great shot but Corporal of Horse Craig Harrison of the British army killed the taliban @ 8,120ft or 2475 meters..

[@timmorgan4505]

Killed 2 one after the other

[@7zobzombie]

Tim Morgan THAT is impressive by any standards.. "CoH Harrison killed the two Taliban machine gunners with shots that took the 8.59 mm, .338 Lapua rounds almost five seconds to hit their targets, which were 914 metres (1,000 yd) beyond the L115A3 sniper rifle’s recommended range. A third shot took out the insurgents' machine gun. The rifle used was made by Accuracy International." THAT is skill.

[@axelcaceres8853]

ryzo mcgregor It took hime 12 shots if im not mistaken. Thats pretty far away.

[@theflu3064]

ryzo mcgregor yea thats insane the wind must have been non existant that day

[@lkvideos7181]

+ryzo mcgregor That my friend is called patience, correct calculation and 80% luck. If the targets had made but just a tiny movement, he would have missed them. Plus Harrison himself said that the weather conditions were virtualy perfect that day and he needed 9 shots just to zero in on the target and the 10th actualy hit.

[@89tonstar]

dudes at long range shooters of Utah shot a milk jug at a Mile with a .308

[@gzitterspiller]

tbone martinez Yes, after 300 tries. Very combat realistic.

[@spikeduval]

awesome

[@nbates9893]

That piece of glass sitting up top that's the price of a used Toyota camry doesn't hurt the cause either...that's for sure. Haha. I can't wait until the day I decide to pull the trigger on purchasing the several thousand dollar night force of my liking. Lmao. That's when you know your in very good shape as far as finances are concerned. Leopold for now though...I can't complain.

[@djmendoza5925]

did it took about 2.5 seconds on the second shot???

[@deefazhion]

Very nice. Carry on. I love the physics. There is an aspect of prayer to the hit though. Much love. In Christ Jesus name.

[@Jsalazar3269]

Rich and I*. Not me and Rich.

[@jakewalden771]

HELL YEAH!!

[@joelyboyblue]

Impossible, couldn't believe my eyes - that's soooooooooooo FAR

[@jagjotsinghpawar]

COH Craig harrison has two confirmed kill one after another of distance more than 2400m. And keep in mind that target were not stationary in his case.

[@lkvideos7181]

+jagjot singh Wrong. The target was stationary. He needed 9 shots to zero in and only the 10th shot actualy hit the target. It's still impressive but Harrison himself acknowledged that the weather conditions were perfectly ideal in that moment.

[@paulm2467]

LKVideos yes but once zeroed in two shots , two kills and then a 3rd incredible shot that disabled the machine gun that they had set up, the most incredible sustained sniping in history.

[@SamsungDuos-rh8yw]

kren 2000 meter kuat

[@fireguy308]

Didn't Jerry Miculek do half that distance free hand with an M107 Barrett 50BMG bursting a balloon with bullet spaulding on steel about the same size, if not smaller? Still impressive system, love the video, would like to see first round hits, because if that was Al Qaeda, they wouldn't be standing still for long after that first round splashes nearby.

[@Vanishing762x54]

You mean when jerry did a video with a 9mm revolver at 1000 yards?

[@fireguy308]

***** Both...

[@Mrich775]

***** Jerry could do a one handed behind the back shot with a bent red ryder at 3000m, all in slowmo on the timer!

[@rocdarjargm]

Nice

[@chrish8906]

Wow

[@Zloner]

Coriolis effect is a bitch..

[@SamsungDuos-rh8yw]

mantap

[@SamsungDuos-rh8yw]

canggih

[@SamsungDuos-rh8yw]

wow kuat

[@davidcruz8667]

"We"? What's this "we" bit? The team here is the shooter and the spotter, you were just an observer. "We". Funny. 😁🤷‍♂️

[@SuperJuiceman11]

While your in Arizona Larry should "Turn Off" any stupid shooting instructors that give little girls uzis and flip then on fill auto...before they hurt any little girls or their families

[@mickwrath4425]

His mistake cost him his life, and I'm sure many learned from it. There is no reason to salt his grave any further, he already paid the ultimate price, and it was a tragety.

[@SuperJuiceman11]

You are right, Im angry that he might have hurt the girl or other innocents with his neglect, but your right any loss of human life in an accident is sad... I meant as joke and I do hope others learn from this and standards at shooting ranges are improved with intelligence

[@mickwrath4425]

Thanks Danny, as a father I'm just thankful the little girl was ok physically, she will have some mental demons to deal with, but the tragedy could have been much worse...thank God it wasn't 2 lives lost.

[@AutoPassion78]

Why I love AI rifles ? because they are the best ! Why I have a AX 308 ? because it's the best 308 rifle !! I love Accuracy International rifles !!

[@michaelanonymous7433]

+François Le Français Et que fais tu d'une PGM UR ? C'est quand même aussi bien !

[@AutoPassion78]

Michael Anonymous oui avec l’esthétique et la modularité en moins.

[@michaelanonymous7433]

L'esthétique est une affaire de goût... La polyvalence est quand même du côté de PGM avec le système de démontage très rapide. On peut parler d'une variable ergonomie/poids. A mon sens je vois plus de PGM UR que d'AI AX 308 sur les pas de tir TLD. Tout ça n'empêche pas ma volonté de prendre une AX pour tester.

[@AutoPassion78]

Michael Anonymous AI a également un système d’interchangeabilité des canons, ce qui permet d'adapter le calibre au tir à effectuer. Il y a également un tas d'accessoires chez AI sans parler des rails déjà présents sur les crosses et un grand nombre de pièces after-market telles que les silencieux, freins de bouche ... Après il y a aussi une question de budget et utilisation comme tu le dis. Moi perso, quand je vois les copains tirer au PGM et leur résultats à 300m et que je compare les miens avec mon AX, je me dis que j'ai pas fait un mauvais achat.

[@michaelanonymous7433]

+François Le Français exact, tout dépend du tireur surtout. Chez PGM il y a surtout un monopod solide et fiable, et les modérateurs de son sont également dispos et de bonne conception. Concernant les rails, il y a des emplacements de vis btr prévus à cet effet. Bien inutile puisque nous ne tirons ni de nuit ni en optique thermique. Mais je suis d'accord, une AX fait le job et fait partie du haut du panier.

[@حيدرالكرار-د2ظ]

🇮🇶🇮🇶❤

[@kjing8109]

wow chris kyle made a kill from 2000 m. Crazy stuff

[@MrChristoffer5700]

jordan king yet Gunnery Sergeant Carlos Hathcock did one at 2,286 with a .50 M2

[@kjing8109]

MrChristoffer5700 Both very good shots :)

[@jagjotsinghpawar]

Craig harrison has confirmed kill of distance more than 2400m and hathcock actually miss that target by few feets but its still really impressive

[@jont2576]

why is it when it comes to sniping,americans like to use the metric system but when it comes to everything else americans like to screw with us and use the imperial system?

[@biggest23]

Because they'll be killing non Americans, who always locate themselves at metric distances away from their enemies. If there's another American civil war however, they'll have to revert to imperial as everyone will invariably be using it in establishing their relative positions from each other.

[@lkvideos7181]

^ this

[@cardiffpicker1]

@@biggest23 that has to be one of the best responses I have ever read.