Wow! The simplicity of your explanation is out of the world!
@raquellima272 жыл бұрын
Hello Justin. Amazing videos! Just started public health and it has been helping me a lot in my biostatistics module! Thank you so much
@adrianteo24212 жыл бұрын
Please make more medical statistics. Very very important
@michaelzumpano73182 жыл бұрын
That was a great explanation of confounding. You have a gift. I’m enjoying all your videos.
@AineamaaniLydia15 күн бұрын
Woooow, such a sweet simple explanation. Thank you so much. I was struggling but I have got help at last.
@MrSarojthapa4 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Your teaching style is easy to follow.
@YusufClack4 жыл бұрын
My favorite stats teacher by far! Thank you. One nitpick was your exerciser vs couch potato RCT example. The confusing part about that is that even if you randomize and make exercisers become inactive, it will be tough to drowned out the noise of the long lasting impacts of that lifestyle. If the sample was massive, I guess it would all average out and you could see some things. But I'd still expect there to be a large coefficient of variation...
@zedstatistics4 жыл бұрын
Thanks Yusuf! Ha yeah by "couch potato" I was simply meaning those that were directed not to exercise. Could have been a little clearer :) Thanks for the feedback!
@pedrot Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video. You're helping me a lot
@OwenMcKinley3 жыл бұрын
Hi Justin, I posted a lengthy question here yesterday regarding mortality rates, but I was able to work through to the answer. I’m leaving this follow-up comment though to thank you for all of your efforts with these tutorials. 😊
@toyinokunuga36053 жыл бұрын
You are amazing!!! I wish I watched yours first. Thanks, I love your accent too😊
@TalgatBainazarov3 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Justin! Awesome explanation!
@shreyasarojkar52674 жыл бұрын
So what you basically do being a statistician ? You data scientist or just a nerd of stats?
@foodruchiSNC4 жыл бұрын
Very nice presentation Sir. 👍
@statisticaldemystic68174 жыл бұрын
Really good examples of confounding. This is an important topic right now with the public suddenly so interested in the slew of correlational research on COVID, and reporters chasing miracle cures indicated by correlations.
@zedstatistics4 жыл бұрын
True that, SD!
@hanymostafa15903 жыл бұрын
perfect teaching
@sallymc9654 жыл бұрын
Haven't seen a new Jeremy's Iron podcast out recently :( Would I be correct to assume that this isolation period has made it significantly more difficult to get together and record them? Love your vids!
@zedstatistics4 жыл бұрын
Stay tuned Sally! New epsiode coming soon... and there's a podcast name change coming too. Something a little less cryptic :)
@sallymc9654 жыл бұрын
@@zedstatistics Super stoked to hear that!! Can't wait for it!!
@Evanxgeline2 жыл бұрын
saved me right before my quiz tyyyy :)
@ricardoafonso75633 жыл бұрын
thank you
@murilopalomosebilla29994 жыл бұрын
Well explained!
@themaddyguy28384 жыл бұрын
Bro can you please suggest me some statistics books in which a large number of solved examples are present and i am a beginner
@olb474 жыл бұрын
When there will be a movie about mediators and moderators?:)
@isleep85194 жыл бұрын
Somehow we still need math language to reiterate everything. Please consider making separate videos including all the math.
@Lee-pf9fl4 жыл бұрын
Are confounding and independent variables the same?
@lydialim19933 жыл бұрын
They can be. But in addition to just being another IV, they're an IV that affects both the outcome variable AND other IVs.
@feifanlu86504 жыл бұрын
Hi Zed, thanks for your video. I learned a lot from your regression videos and I have a question regarding the confounding variable and Exogeneity. Since a confounding variable affects both an Independent variable X and a dependent variable Y. Is there any chance it becomes an omitted variable and its explaining ability has been added to the error term in our regression model to cause the endogeneity problem? What if we add this confounding variable into our model to fix the endogeneity? Will it cause collinearity? Because it seems the confounding variable is highly correlated with one independent variable.