Рет қаралды 3,413
According to the High Court of Australia, section 92, the freedom of interstate trade and commerce, will be breached if the law promotes a discriminatory burden of a protectionist kind. In this video, we will analyse what that means!
0:00 - Section 92
1:58 - Burden
2:35 - Discrimination
4:33 - Protectionism
// This video does not provide legal counselling or opinion about cases. This channel was created for educational purposes only. //
SUBSCRIBE: kzbin.info?s...
BECOME A MEMBER: / @aussielaw
*****
PLAYLISTS:
- Australian Case Law - • Australian Case Law
- Constitutional Law - • Constitutional Law
- Constitutional Interpretation - • Constitutional Interpr...
- Constitutional Provisions Explained - • Constitutional Provisi...
- Federalism in Australia - • Federalism in Australia
- Australian Law and History - • Australian Law & History
*****
RELATED VIDEOS:
- Express “Rights”: Free Trade, Commerce, and Intercourse between States (s 92) - • Express “Rights”: Free...
- Cole v Whitfield: The Two Limbs of Section 92 and the Free Trade Theory - • COLE v WHITFIELD (1988...
- Palmer v Western Australia (2021): Border Closures and the Freedom of Intercourse (s 92) - • PALMER v WESTERN AUSTR...
- Australian Federalism, COVID, and Interstate Border Closures - • Australian FEDERALISM,...
*****
LINKS:
- The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act : www.legislation.gov.au/Detail...
- Cole v Whitfield (1988) : www.jade.io/article/67418
*****
TWITTER: / renatosmcosta
ACADEMIC PROFILES:
law.uq.edu.au/profile/11028/r...
www.uq.academia.edu/RenatoSaeg...
#auslaw #australianconstitution #section92