When Hikaru and Magnus played blitz | World Blitz Championship 2010

[@ceesvegh4904]

a very masculin sport... chess!

[@alexbonneville5288]

You guys have a poor sense of observation, from what I see Naka lost in time ^^ It's obvious

[@joshpomeranc4381]

Nope. Carlsen's time ran out.

[@HuyPham-gu3pu]

Carlsen relize that he ran out of time and resign

[@torontotango]

0:47 g5 !? very interesting, Magnus thought a long time to reply... Nakamura did very well here .. Classical games: Magnus Carlsen beat Hikaru Nakamura 7 to 0, with 15 draws. Including rapid/exhibition games: Magnus Carlsen beat Hikaru Nakamura 12 to 5, with 20 draws. Only rapid/exhibition games: Hikaru Nakamura tied Magnus Carlsen 5 to 5, with 5 draws. *The figures above are based only on games present in "Chessgames " which may be incomplete.

[@GuitarandSoccer140]

@xDirectJABx Naka won on time. Carlsen extended his hand first, and as you can tell towards the end, he was running out of time, trying to make moves faster.

[@lovetownsend]

5:53 the single pawn middle with the 2 pawns on third fleets. epic view

[@enpowrs]

naka played extremely well here

[@DavidCampbell3141]

Also note Carlsen's sportsmanship in being first to point out his flag has fallen, when that responsibility was Nakamura's.

[@amuricuh6143]

Love these blitz games. 2018 any1?

[@mohamedhamed1752]

is Nakamura a professional ؟

[@MegaYafte]

who won????

[@Luke-uy3ze]

Hikaru

[@mikwolf00]

The eternal ones...🖤♟️

[@Y05HlKAGE]

2023

[@JonnyLawrence]

6:20 at the back, why is carlsen's dad that far back?? He should get front row

[@woodyeckerslyke]

@PabloDPena At the end of the game Hikaru's manner would indicate that he has more time. Also as you play through the game you see that Magnus has lots of problems to solve and at the end of the game he is moving almost immediately on his 2s increment which, in part, leads him to blundering the exchange to 34...Nf3+. This clearly and strongly implies that Hikaru won, but just in case there's any doubt go to game number 1599842 on the chessgames website.

[@ray8uk]

1.15 the arbiter shows a member of the public who is "boss" by nudging him otta the way!

[@stephenkingrules1]

Even at 3:05 they are trying to remember some more variations...

[@Jstallard85]

That's not like Carlsen to loose on time like that from a drawish position

[@PabloDPena]

@woodyeckerslyke uh sorry it's 1-0 carlsen won on time.

[@jeffblair4396]

Nakamura might have wanted to stop magnus' pawn from moving to h7 after the exchange at e5.

[@arsovangel6525]

they don't even look in each others eyes when they shake hands.

[@kevlarunderwear22]

uh sorry you dont know whats going on

[@xDirectJABx]

I'm pretty sure Carlsen won on time...

[@milchkanne21]

chess what abeautiful game.Thanks chess vibes

[@timespaice]

carlsen just lost this part....

[@Jauvisa81]

He didn't resign, he forfeit in time

[@DavidCampbell3141]

No-- Carlsen lost on time, he just hit his side of the clock after he had run out of time. See chessgames' record of the game.

[@alwaysgonnagiveyouup4332]

No Naka lost on time

[@patrickkb100]

14..,Ng4 15.g6

[@MrTubeless2010]

nakamura its a badname?!

[@CCMAR]

First Blood 0:55

[@paradoxicus]

Naka!!!

[@megas817]

Who won ?

[@aitooor19]

Quien gana

[@fearlab]

flag!

[@mikeblair333]

at 7:20 did naka not have Ng3 winning magnus's rook?

[@alivekai3087]

mikeblair333 no,carlsen could just take the dark square bishop

[@liadmadmon9124]

"lol"

[@maschinenmeister]

Nakamura won through Carlen's resignation

[@HackerAutodidata]

*carlsen*

[@kevlarunderwear22]

AND he was getting his king and rook forked

[@bigfriki]

Look how Carlsens father is trying to see sth. over the heads, just til 02:34.

[@JuicersSuck]

@cellardoor70 Exactly... I wonder how many moves are already memorized before variations come into play.