Which Camera + 3 Lenses?

[@cameraconspiracies]

If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, you can film your short movie called Bigfoot and his pet Raccoon go to Bollywood. Canon R8 amzn.to/4bjKfME Canon EF 35mm f1.4 amzn.to/3WBkHXb OM Sushi Shirts vegetablepolice.threadless.com/designs/om-sushi/mens/t-shirt/extra-soft All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice

[@jw48335]

The 0.71X Canon EF-EOS R adapter made for the C70 works perfectly well on the crop sensor Canons. I use it to convert my 16-35 F4, 24-105 F4, and 100-400 F4.5-5.6 into 18-40 2.8, 27-119 2.8, and a 114-454 F3.5-4.8. Then if I need more reach, I can just pop off the adapter to get the 1.6 factor. It, oddly, even bypasses the crop factor on my EF-converted 10-18 and turns it into an 11-20 (actual FF focal range) 3.5-4.8. So, I've got full frame equivalent coverage of 11mm all the way up to 560mm, in comparatively bright coverage. Then, both on the 1.4x TC and suddently the long end goes to 896mm. I also have the 35mm IS USM F2, which becomes a 40mm F1.4 with the reducer :)

[@Fessoid]

In Russia you pronounce 'Nikon' . In America - 'Nike on' ))

[@charliejg]

Maybe a vintage super 8mm movie camera would be just what you need. Imagine the fun converting that for KZbin. You would be in vintage heaven. Fun video. Always fun to wonder... Have a great day!

[@AdamQuinnPhoto]

I have such a camera -- and would be more than willing to sell it -- and a machine for digitizing 8mm and Super8 to HD (one frame at a time) but I'm not sure if it's possible to get film anymore.

[@charliejg]

@@AdamQuinnPhoto Cool!! I have a bunch of Super 8 movies of my HS football games. They were converted to HD. I remember my dad shooting 8mm movies as well. I also have an 8mm camera. Don't know if it works though.

[@tech-utuber2219]

Have to admire yet another flawless and professionally executed presentation by the Internet’s premiere camera imaging authority. Nothing else comes close. (Read it and weep, Tony and Chelsea.)

[@TheStorytellingDad]

He deleted my comment about him being in the Toneh!

[@tech-utuber2219]

@@TheStorytellingDad You are not the first one to report this.

[@TheLinesEnd]

A7iv, Sony 24-70 2.8 GMII, Sigma 85mm 1.4 Art DGDN, Sony 70-200 2.8 GMII

[@ilvmni]

You turned me on to Olympus a couple years ago, my main carry around lenses are the 12mm 2.0 and the 25 1.2 and ive been very happy even though I'm still on the em1 mkii. For long reach I adapt an old nikon 80-200 f2.8 push pull lens that I got for a couple hundred dollars. No autofocus but with a teleconterter I was able to get a nice video of the solar eclipse.

[@krazywabbit]

Going to predict within the next several months of this video, the following will happen: "Yo Bro, love your channel! I'm looking for a camera to film wildlife and occasional bathroom shots. What do you recommend. Did I say love your channel?" CC: "Did you not watch ANY of my previous videos? Was that your question?"

[@tech-utuber2219]

13:24 Fantastic footage.

[@1BigBucks1]

Fuji color magic 🎨

[@my_obscure_epoch9346]

Will we get some more wildlife videos as the weather warms up? I miss those.

[@danncorbit3623]

Don't worry. Those frozen Canadian Wood Frogs will thaw out by June and the magnificent King Duck will wriggle out of his frozen prison in the tundra.

[@TheStorytellingDad]

There’s always Ratboy

[@romenorom]

What happened with squirrels

[@JohnDrummondPhoto]

My second comment: invest in some barn doors for your light. Or a grid. That will let you highlight your face while keeping the background dark.

[@Fessoid]

90% agreed! Thats what i learned in internet

[@GeertKuster]

I just did this! I've had too many different systems and sold it all. I ended up with: Fuji XH2s with 50-140mm f2.8 and three of the Cron primes (16, 35, 50). I kept my XT1 on the side. So there's that. Fun thing you mention the Z6iii. I hated the Zf in-hand. I would've rather had the Z6iii I guess. But there's none.

[@rpmusick]

X-S20 all the way

[@catherinegrimes2308]

I have the X-S20 and the XF 70-300mm.

[@mmdesignn]

​@@catherinegrimes2308 So?

[@klaustrussel]

Wow that OM image is CINEMA

[@hanshart1413]

A lantern is not the best solution as keylight because you don't have much control over your background exposure. Better use a softbox (with grid if necessary) for the keylight, that will control the lightspill and then you can use your lantern for the overall room exposure on a second light.

[@cameraconspiracies]

Yes, but lantern is better for the face. You gotta decide between nice face and nice background :)

[@hanshart1413]

@@cameraconspiracies I disagree, if that would be true then a lantern would used commonly in portrait photography. Size, positioning, distance and fill are more important to make the face look better. For your room size I would get something like a 90cm circular softbox or even a cheap octabox. The distance from your face should be around the size of the modifier so around 90cm. You can arrange it in a classic rembrandt (more drama) or butterfly (prettier face) position. Then just fill the shadows side (the dark side of your face for rembrand or from underneath your face for butterfly) in with a reflector or second light (if you want to be extra fancy). Play around with that until you get it right and you will get your teenage skin back ;)

[@Bill-NM]

​@@hanshart1413what is "butterfly"? Thanks...

[@lecolintube]

⁠@@Bill-NMIt’s a lighting technique where the key light is placed directly in front and above the sitter/talent. It creates a shadow directly under the sitters chin, lips, bottom of the nose and under the cheekbones. (I believe it’s called butterfly 🦋 because it’s symmetrical, *my take is that the bridge of the nose acts a little like the butterfly’s body, and the chin to the upper part of the cheek bones, which are highlighted symmetrically ‘being a little like the butterflies wings - though most explanations I’ve heard on this is just because of the shape of the shadow it casts under the nose is like a small butterfly 😉). Either way the light falls evenly on both sides of the face, with the shadow of the nose nestling directly below the nose on the upper lip. It’s also known as ‘paramount’ lighting, and ‘glamour’ lighting. And it differs from loop lighting and Rembrandt lighting where the shadows fall more across the face or asymmetrically across the face with the nose shadow towards or across one of the cheeks. There’s lots of examples out there to see what it looks like if you do a quick search for butterfly lighting 🦋 Hope that helps 🧡

[@Bill-NM]

​@@lecolintubethanks very much. Very nice explanation. Much appreciated.

[@RichardBO9]

Nikon Z8, Zeiss 18mm Milvus, Voigtlander 65mm, Nikon 400mm F/4.5.

[@andhib]

Nice! almost same as my all-Nikkor lens choice: 20mm f1.8S, 85mm f1.8S, with the 400 f4.5.

[@audioupgrades]

Too much to comment on but if you think the background is too flat, you can put up some sidelights to give shadows. They can work as rimlights for you too.

[@yamaaizizi]

GFX 100ii , Zeiss Otus lenses 28mm, 55mm, 100mm.

[@venom2k2]

Would love to get a Leica M11, but I will stick with Fuji. I will go with the xt5, 18mm f/1.4, 35mm f/1.4 and 56mm f/1.2 r wr.

[@ubiquitousreverser]

Just found your channel a few weeks ago, and didn’t catch the video on the canon m50 comparison. Was thinking the inbody stabilizer would be good for walking videos, only to find out too late that I’ll need a gimble. But for a small mirrorless with the articulating screen, Nikon couldn’t bring it, as the D3200 was what I used before. But doing video of myself was a drag with the lack of easily seeing myself.

[@Amarthir]

For Fuji I'd also suggest you check out the Zeiss Touit 32mm f1.8 (compared to the Fuji 35mm f1.4). The fuji has an aperture advantage, but the zeiss has less elements, is quieter (hard to believe but it is), is a little wider and much pricier, little heavier too. In terms of contrast the Touit has a slight advantage. Compared to the other Touits for Fuji it is the only one with a low elements count and a great optical formula, the 12mm and 50mm kinda suck :'D

[@JoATTech]

Leica 9mm is must have for m43 :D

[@illius85]

have you tried the Sony 50 1.2 Gangsta Mode for 3d pop?

[@houserhythm]

Nikon has the 20mm t1.8 that's pretty good. Viltrox also released the 16mm that everyone said was amazing for Sony.

[@TheStorytellingDad]

As you’ve said before, you could do this entire channel with a 6D mkii and 17-40 f/4(yes, it’s a great lens for a zoom), and 100-400, and 24 1.4, and you’re done!

[@Bill-NM]

G9ii with 100-400. The 200/2.8 is BEAUTIFUL but the lack of reach is too much for me to give up. Maybe there's something about me that makes wildlife stay far away. :) And the 15/1.7 and 25/1.4 for general purpose. S5ii with 20-60 and 50/1.8, and if I can afford it the 100/2.8 macro (that thing has POP). As well as a couple/few vintage/manual lenses. Zeiss Jena Pancolar 50/1.8, Jupiter 8 50/2, and Nikon 105/2.5. Plus a couple small/rangefinder L39 / M-mount lenses. Minolta Rokkor 40/2 for example.

[@papafrita96]

What would be a good lens trio for Canon EF lenses? I'm after that POP

[@AprilClayton]

I would pick Sony 70-350 for my wildlife lens. I miss it. I just had to have full frame. The Sigma is heavy and less stable. That Sony lens was stable. Image quality was great.

[@JetBen555]

The 70-350 is a gem! Its basically a GM lens for APSC

[@vindeg33]

I was on the fence after seeing some great MarkusPix Panny Boy reviews. However, I was just at the camera store and I felt a great wave of relief that I went with a Sony a6700. I got some vintage 3D pop lenses for it! Panny Boy's are too big. Strangely light for their sizes. Markus Pix has me eye'ing camcorders too. Those are better than the DJI Osmosis 3. I want to buy 6 camcorders.

[@Princeton_James]

I love my Xs20 so much. The only issue is its not weather sealed. For this reason im taking my A7Iv w 16-35 2.8ii and tamron 28-200 for travel.

[@AdamQuinnPhoto]

I don't do vlogging or wildlife; I mainly photograph sports so I would go with two Canon R3 bodies, a 400mm f/2.8, a 100-300 f/2.8, and a 24-105 f/2.8. Though it would require more than a few hundred dollars to acquire those items...

[@letni9506]

I'm a M43 loser but if i lost all my gear and had to start again id buy an R7 and R5. The 200-800, 24-70 2.8 and 85mm 1.2 if i was a thousandaire.

[@filmstudiojapanDOTcom]

Ahh, but 500mm with the 1.4x tc becomes 700mm, divided by .79 becomes 553mm, which ain't bad. ... then there is the 35mm crop mode which gives you back 60mp at 700mm with better color than any full frame camera out there.. I rock the 250mm with the tc, and yes it is often not enough reach, but when it is, it's pretty glorious.

[@gamebuster800]

Start over, no money limit, two bodies? A7Cr and A9 III 12-24 F/2.8 GM Tamron 35-150 (I own this) 100-400 GM (I own the 200600G but it is too big) Or something Leica / Hasselblad

[@simpletraveltech]

Canon R8: RF 24-105mm F4L, RF 16mm F2.8, RF 50mm F1.2L Sony A7CR: Sony EF20-70 F4, Sigma E-Mount 28-70 F2.8 DG DN, Sony 50mm F1.4GM

[@joudi_pics]

Z8, Red upcoming video camera, 14-24 2.8 S, 50 1.2 S, 135 1.8 Plena

[@Ed_Scott]

This is a pretty good list👌🏾

[@HardwareG33k]

You win

[@constantineilev7977]

After the new firmware for xh2s (6.0), the camera can't focus in video at all! It hunts like crazy, it's basically a manual focus camera now...

[@Narsuitus]

Here are my favorite 3-lens kits: Nikon F2 35mm film SLR 35mm f/1.4 Nikkor 85mm f/1.4 Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 Nikkor Nikon F4 35mm film auto focus SLR 14-24mm f/2.8 Nikkor 28-70mm f/2.8 Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8 Nikkor Leica M6 35mm film rangefinder 21mm f/1.4 Leitz 35mm f/1.4 Zeiss 90mm f/2 Leitz RB67 medium format film SLR 50mm f/4.5 90mm f/3.8 180mm f/4.5 Fuji X-Pro2 APS-C mirrorless digital 16mm f/1.4 Fujinon 23mm f/1.4 Fujinon 56mm f/1.2 Fujinon Fuji X-Pro2 APS-C mirrorless digital 16-55mm f/2.8 Fujinon 50-140mm f/2.8 Fujinon 12mm f/2.8 Zeiss

[@karewenger1343]

Canon EOS 1DXiii, EF16-35mm f/4 L IS, Zeiss Otus 85 f/1.4 and EF28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 L IS.

[@Fessoid]

8:40 Cause lenses with same F-stop could differ in T-stop ;-) Just remember

[@BobAsbury]

Woo hoo!

[@steveanderson5226]

YAR!

[@MinimalWave1982]

How could you sell that Leica 200mm... That lens looked better then anything else you recorded.

[@cameraconspiracies]

No good cameras in m4/3, not enough reach.

[@evenhandedcommentor6102]

I want the Sony 600mm f/4. Casey saus., "Go to school." What school do I go to to get that lens?

[@TheNewArtSchool]

Great video! You dont like the Canon EF 35mm 1st version? For me its an amazing lens! What would you replace it with?

[@MikedieONE]

why not the R3 for canon wildlife? you would get 240fps in FHD.

[@Fessoid]

Zenit-M with Helios-44, hahaha. It could be vlogging setup ))

[@danteedee8204]

A7V or A7ciir with Laowa 10mm f2.8 af, tamron 35mm to 150mm f2 to f2.8 and sigma 60 to 600mm.

[@allencrider]

I'm excited to have ordered a 25mm Pergear f1.7 lens for my Olympus system. Can't wait to try it.

[@cameraconspiracies]

May God help you.

[@allencrider]

@@cameraconspiracies If God didn't help me, I'd be shooting with Canon.

[@WilliamTaylor-h4r]

I got the royal country 2.2x 72mm 1lb filter & the royal lands 8 adapters after supposing the olden sigmas' for a while, the ugly and as | is both looked brand new, Holly crap! But they didn't have no Royal Merful products, so I changed my mind.

[@ForbesPhoto]

"100-aire". thank you Strongbad

[@incee_netinai]

Potential shirt

[@jonfletcher147]

Sony a6700, try the Sigma 10-18 & 18-50 Toneh 2.8's! they are incredible for the money! tiny too! oh and add the amazing Sony 70-350! 525mm 35mm equiv, tiny and light!

[@wandiloch]

Sigma SD1 with the Sigma 14mm, 40mm, and 100mm Art lenses

[@Whatsup_Abroad]

s5iix, the most recent update is pretty amazing.

[@By_Rant_Or_Ruin]

Yuppers. Good show. Nice light. The usual audio - gootness but a touch boom-E?. Hell awaits. I'm on my way baby. Flip this screen mr.

[@troublesomecorsair]

one of the lenses has to be for the rat-boy effect

[@OutingJournal]

Get the 6mm F2 for MFT

[@thebentzenable]

I'm still saving up for the R8. I just sold my Lumix S5. I have the EF 35, 50, 85mm all ready. When I get rich I will definitely buy a Panasonic again.

[@-grey]

Save up a couple hundred bucks more, and get a refurbished R6II straight from Canon. The price is negligibly more for IBIS.

[@JohnDrummondPhoto]

You really need IBIS for vlogging. So, sorry R8 but the R6 II rules here. R8 for a second body. [EDIT: I wrote that before seeing you endorse the R5, which I agree is their best body.] RF 16mm, RF 24mm F/1.8, and RF 100-400 with 1.4x extender. That last lens is slow, but noise is so easy to clean up nowadays that F/8 (F/11 with the extender) is actually doable for wildlife. I just tested it recently against the RF 100-500. It held up.

[@LeBironzilla]

To be honest, I want to know, if you will merge the segment of Olympus and Panasonic together, what will be yours combos? Will you take the 9mm or the 12, The 25 Oly or Leica, and will you take the oly 300 F4 or the Leica 200mm. I very interest on wich one you will take espacialy the later one. Also, I never you speak about the 75Mm F1,8. I trying to find a Solution for the my telephone photo need. Right now I have the 75mm. And a few 40-150 entery level zoom. (The 43 40-150 3,5-4,5 and 40-150mm AND the M43 40-150 4-5,6 MSC). I do bird right now and inside sport I got some nice shoot with the M43 in cloudy day but I did have to rise the iso a lot and of course I am in a dillema. One Lens or Two lens. Fix should a Get a fix lens. The Old 150MM F2,0 and add a telecoverter to go to F4 if I need it or 210mm at F2.8. Should I CGet the Leica Should I can the Olympus 300mm. Should I go the zoom Road: 40-150 F2.8, add telecoverter if I need more reach The Old 35-100 F2,0 The Old 50-200 F2.8-3.5 (Version I or II) One of the 100-400 Or just go for the 75-300/70-300 pana or olympus. Curious to heard yours opinion

[@Bill-NM]

Personally I had the 200/2.8 (but not the teleconverter) - it provides a gorgeous image but the 100-400 is just SO much more flexible. And zooming to 800mm (equiv) makes up for the slightly worse image.

[@careylymanjones]

If there's too much in your shot, you're not close enough.

[@flightographist]

How come we get one body and you get 2? So, I choose Imax, specifically the Phantom 65 3D! The lenses- 50 and 80 ( Otttoblad of course) so immersion within a stuffed frame is guaranteed! The third would be a Sphero 65 baby. In that universe, I could also afford to hire a scooter boy to hump it all around for me.

[@iamdanfleser]

12:44 is no 3d pop u silly :)) is just an illusion, because u have red tshirt and almost white background + blur. Video idea: Try the shot like at 12:44 now on any other camera with same t2.8

[@POVwithRC]

It's a tough one. If I had to fit it in the content I create it would be a direct replacement for what I have now. FX3, 14mm GM, GMii 24-70 and 70-200 (with Tc). The 14 is the closest I have ever gotten to God.

[@transamericanlife]

Sony fx 3 with Zeiss Nano Primes

[@CaliforniaPhantom]

I’m on my 4th and final Canon with the R5 mark ii. I swear to god if this doesn’t solve all my problems and brokers peace in the Middle East I’m switching to Sony. I’ve had a tumultuous relationship with Canon. It’s more of an abusive relationship, whereby I was the one being abused.

[@mbenjamin292]

Shark camera in black 2xlarge signe me up.😊I will send what you think is cool in (thanks ).

[@jolladevices]

Sony x1000v (x3000v) is the one item solution, I still use it

[@h.o.j2375]

I want a R6 mkii with 30mp-35mp 😂 it doesn’t exist but I can dream. Time for canon to release a full frame 30-35mp that comes with ibis. I will buy that camera when it exists. Then dream lens I would go with 24-70 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 and a 35mm 1.8. I know the 35mm 1.8 doesn’t seem to make sense in this line up, I want a small light lens for when I need to get up close and personal and not scare my subjects by pointing a huge lens at them. I just wish canon would get rid of the macro capabilities of this lens so it would be faster focusing and quieter.

[@rephaelreyes8552]

12:55 wait wth!?! SONY!?!? WHATS UP WITH YOUR COLORS MAN?

[@sotocine99]

Santa Claus will bring you something nice.

[@ElRubio864]

Lumix S1 mk2, 16-35 f4, 50 1.4 and sigma 60-600 (hopefully the release a panaleica)

[@themanfromgoteborg]

I was thinking exactly this combination but with S5iix

[@JoATTech]

Which 6? So all existing companies? :D

[@LTPottenger]

I'm going to say Nigh Can from now on as a compromise.

[@nicedward7544]

A7Riii +Canon 200 2.8 prime+15 laowa+65 voigtlander

[@BackusCreativeImaging]

13:01 - That's the exact lens you got onto Tony Northrup using and why you started the "Toneh" thing. Now you're just as shallow, even worse so considering these lenses would destroy your hundredaire budget.

[@tech-utuber2219]

New T-shirt, ‘ey? Where are the “Photographers are Losers” T-shirts? Asking for a friend.

[@MakePictures]

100%. 35 is lukewarm water. not wide enough not close enough. my x100 i use the digital telephoto everytime

[@MrCloud254]

35mm is the worst focal length. It's scientific.

[@maups2]

why does the bird at 2:29 look so bad

[@nevvanclarke9225]

Fujifilm GFX 100ii..... Give me the big daddy

[@johndoane7200]

Orange Julius…

[@kamezu]

Please add chapters for those who would like to jump to specific manufacturers. For instance, I am only interested in the Sony recommendations, but had to search for the time point where you begin to cover recommendations for Sony. Could not care less for the L mount alliance and the rest.

[@paniko9556]

I think he’ll do a video about your comment in the near future 😅🫡

[@cameraconspiracies]

I'm not going to aid you in skipping my video you lazy sod lol. Grow the attention span of a 4th grader and try to make it through the video.

[@kamezu]

Enabling content either way. You are welcome.

[@kamezu]

Also, I have no reason to pay attention to things that do not interest me. You will say it’s not your concern, since you are clearly not able to take any constructive feedback, even after saying “Please”. It was a simple matter of enabling your viewers to save time and get to the relevant parts of your video. Please enlighten what attention span has anything to do here Mr. Highly Attentive sod :)

[@Bill-NM]

​@@kamezubut how do you know you have no interest if you don't pay attention first. After all, that's exactly how you found Sony.

[@TheStorytellingDad]

I’d like to see you do a cheap combo video where you actually do buy a cheap camera and lens, and actually use it.

[@gelatosamurai]

Ha!

[@krhump]

Raining in Australia

[@romenorom]

Why not g9ii and om 150-600?

[@cameraconspiracies]

They wouldn't sync.

[@Bill-NM]

And it's HUGE. If a person wants to carry a FF lens, then get a FF body to take advantage of it, and, it might actually weigh less than the G9ii. I used an A7R2 for a while, and in crop mode with the 150-600, I'd still get 18mp - at 900mm field-of-view.

[@aps5150]

6:46 always seemed strange to me how non-Americans pronounce Nikon and Nikkor with the same "i" sound. Good example with "Nike" which is not pronounced the same as the name "Nikki". Weird pronunciation debunked!

[@sunwalker4017]

i'm very okay with "Naikon" but i cannot get along to say "C" instead of "Zed" for Z. glad you are using it right

[@AI3Dorinte]

THANK YOU!!! I hate 35mm with a passion!!!!

[@Fessoid]

Sony A1 or A7R5 ))) Or Canon R5 + 100-500 RF excellent quality lens (you still will have plenty of room in cropping 48 mpx footage).

[@cameraconspiracies]

Not in video.

[@pixxelpusher]

Nick-on / Nike-on ... So-knee / Sonny

[@JoATTech]

Get the Ursa 12k Cine. It has flippy screen :D

[@jenesuispasbavard]

Fuji X-S20 gang.

[@videogame-techreviews]

Seriously though t-4 lenses… No, G, go 24 gm 1.4 and use digital zoom on sony a1. (Does the a7siii not have that feature?) Oh you have 100s of dollars, but youre getting a 200-600 brah; youre so funny.

[@MinnowMoto]

Haha, Why would it be fed ex guy! Great Game.

[@karikaru]

A KZbinrs three body problem

[@budra90]

I remember you saying Fuji stabe is bad. I have the XS-20. I have recently recorded this footage. kzbin.info/www/bejne/i5PQeaWsjM2nkNk As you can see, the stabe is perfect. Therefore, you should get a Fuji.

[@arizonarealestatewithdonbarar]

But it still dropped focus at 00:13 and a little at 00:24

[@cameraconspiracies]

I've always said Fuji has amazing telephoto stabe, and terrible handheld vlogging stabe.

[@MrRafalEn]

You perfectly showed all fatal flaws of Fuji and why I ditched them for video. This jerky / jumpy IBIS looks horrible and AF does is standard thing of searching objects in the background. Canon R8 with OIS lens is definitely better than this.

[@jamesloop]

But which sIgMa camera would you choose? 😵‍💫

[@TheArneSaknussemm]

It’s actually pronounced knee-con with the n at the end half swallowed. So all the nigh vs ni is hilarious

[@KissFilmNc]

😂😂😂😂

[@keithnisbet]

G9ii for sure. Pannnie Leica firmware updates are regular and powerful, feature packed bodies, built like little tanks, Panasonic, the new cult classic without Sony/Nikon arrogance, great customer response, bye bye Fuji, tired of expensive Sony bodies with no firmware updates, Nikon...too little too late too expensive. Welcome to the MFT lover Dark Side. If you disagree I'm sending the Vegetable Police to pick you up and take you to 999 Queens St. West! ❤😂