We need this as a series. You could do one on Frankenstein, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Hunchback of Norte Dame... even non-horror books like Wizard of Oz. I see nothing but endless potential here!
@unwelldanny71085 жыл бұрын
Notre Dame isn't horror (I've only seen the Disney movie so)
@LucyLioness1005 жыл бұрын
I’d enjoy all those. All endless possibilities
@bbsj865 жыл бұрын
@@unwelldanny7108 I mean you're very wrong but sure
@ninjabluefyre38155 жыл бұрын
For Wizard of Oz, I'd say the 1982 Japanese animated version is the most accurate version I've seen, which was kinda disappointing, it's a 1980's anime, where's all the crazy nonsensical stuff? Other than the crazy stuff already in the story.
@ruyman905 жыл бұрын
What about a Christmas Carol, Moses, or most of the Grimm Brothers tales.
@JTISREBORN5 жыл бұрын
I could listen to James talk about horror movies all day. It never gets old. His videos are so informative. I love it.
@gyromurphy5 жыл бұрын
I do sometimes listen to James talk about horror all day. I'll Que up 5 or 6 monster madness playlists and put em on the big TV at work. The whole store gets bathed in Cinemassacre's glory.
@goldfishprime5 жыл бұрын
Mhm, 33 minute James horror chat video? Yes, please
@MidwestVillain_Z5 жыл бұрын
Yea wish he did a podcast, I can't imagine the work that went into this video
@jonathanredford2155 жыл бұрын
Yeah you can tell it's a passion for him
@ivans.1915 жыл бұрын
Right! I also like the fact that the way James talks about Dracula movies is almost the same as I wrote it in my book about history of horror movies. So it's like listening to a very close friend)
@fillervision35 жыл бұрын
Would you consider doing a similar video with the Frankenstein adaptations?
@connorbrennan42335 жыл бұрын
And Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Phantom of the Opera, Hunchback of Notre Dame?
@carterscustomrods5 жыл бұрын
That's too easy... Young Frankenstein wins every time!!!!!
@hectorsalcido41065 жыл бұрын
The Wolf Man .
@beetones44885 жыл бұрын
I'll almost guarantee thats coming, and I can't wait!
@bigredjanie5 жыл бұрын
That would be interesting... especially since in the Universal films, plot elements from the novel were basically split between the original and Bride of Frankenstein.
@matafuko3 жыл бұрын
The Coppola one has many surface level details which makes it look really faithful, but Mina's affair with Dracula fundamentally changes the story.
@lyndoncmp57512 жыл бұрын
Exactly. The Coppola Dracula is an emotional rock star. In Stoker's book he was an unfeeling monster.
@wwb162 жыл бұрын
I think it makes him more interesting
@alvaromorales65022 жыл бұрын
People love Coppolas version, but making Dracula some sort of tragic lover really ruined the whole movie for me. Some characters don't need to be humanized, Dracula is one of them
@NakedSnake852 жыл бұрын
Having seen the Coppolas Dracula count(I made a funny)less times , I was suprised when I read the book, there was no romance between Dracula and Mina. Other than that, I think it was pretty faithful.
@Buttcakes152 жыл бұрын
Coppola was a huge fan of the book and made the original story infinitely better while also being deeply faithful.
@petercapsanis58395 жыл бұрын
I love this kind of content. Someone talking about a subject they're genuinely passionate and knowledgeable about. Not chasing any trend or grabbing for views. Just a horror movie nerd talking about something he wants to talk about.
@ericfelds62915 жыл бұрын
I have absolutely no interest in old horror movies, but I'd gladly sit in the same spot for hours just to hear James ramble on about them. His passion is infectious.
@tenalpoen5 жыл бұрын
I'm pretty much the same. James is able to actually make me interested in something I'd otherwise not give much thought. I appreciate the effort he puts into his videos.
@ivans.1915 жыл бұрын
Being a classic horror cinema nerd as well it's very interesting to me to listen to someone who shares the same views)
@monkeydragon85355 жыл бұрын
I was rooting for Coppola's version. That was the one I saw when I was a kid. Looking back, I can't believe my parents let me watch it. I was 10.
@dannymiller71874 жыл бұрын
My parents let me watch the exorcist when I was 5. As well as Friday the thirteenth and nightmare on Elm street and all those other slasher and horror movies. Not saying it’s a good idea I’m pretty fucked up from it.
@SatanAteMySocks4 жыл бұрын
I taped the movie on VHS when I was in primary school - or maybe my mother taped it for me - and I always loved this movie since.
@littlekingtrashmouth92194 жыл бұрын
Monica Bellucci 😍
@markiv29424 жыл бұрын
@@SatanAteMySocks Same. I was like 13. Really liked it.
@heatherharper72833 жыл бұрын
Coppola version was so scary it give me nightmares
@joker167able5 жыл бұрын
I was saddened to learn the 1972 classic Blackula wasn’t eligible for consideration 😐
@onlythewise15 жыл бұрын
the real one was European
@OttoGraff-fu8pj5 жыл бұрын
onlythewise1 woooosh
@onlythewise15 жыл бұрын
@@OttoGraff-fu8pj yep wooooosh in goes the basketball two points I win
@OttoGraff-fu8pj5 жыл бұрын
onlythewise1 I… don’t think you know what wooosh means
@counterfeit11485 жыл бұрын
Two r/itswooooshwith4os
@jessicajayes83262 жыл бұрын
The original Dracula was written like a found footage film. I'm surprised that hasn't happened yet. Just imagine Jonathan vlogging about his travels and only being able to film vampires in night vision or only the filters pick them up. Mina and Lucy skyping together, Sewerd watching security cameras of his patients, news broadcasts, filming with phones and other devices.
@vandarkholme85482 жыл бұрын
That would be a train wreck... but an interesting one
@tuckerbowen4626 Жыл бұрын
i don't care if it ends up working or not, i now want to see that movie!
@gizurrr964 Жыл бұрын
analog horror Dracula? :0
@Jim-Mc Жыл бұрын
Only thing difficult to translate to modern times is why Harker has to go in person all the way to rural Romania for a real estate deal. But there are still very remote places in that part of the world where something could be hiding in some ruins for centuries ⚰️💀🕸
@JohannesVanDerStuyvebode Жыл бұрын
Vlad Tepes begs the differ...
@garboil5 жыл бұрын
Ill bet that the reason Franco’s Dracula had a moustache was on Lee’s insistence; Lee was remarkably well read and loved detail.
@1845Raven5 жыл бұрын
I saw a video recently on Christopher Lee. Fascinating guy. His real life was more interesting than the characters he has played in the movies!!
@Fedorevsky5 жыл бұрын
@@1845Raven His real life was more interesting than any character anyone has ever played in any movie.
@calumbeaton45885 жыл бұрын
You're right- in fact he only agreed to do the film if he was allowed to have the moustache
@fenriz2185 жыл бұрын
Franco got the moustache right... which is about the only thing he ever got right in his entire career as a film-maker. But I'll agree with the comments: Lee was an impressive man (had the privilege and good fortune to meet him and his wife in person, a few years before he passed away). Almost seems, that there was in event in the 20th century that he wasn't somehow part of. From having met JRR Tolkien to his efforts in WW2 or having his relative, Ian Flemming, loosely basing the character of James Bond on him... check out the execution of Eugen Weidmann on KZbin, a serial killer and the last person to be publicly beheaded in France: there's a very young Christopher Lee standing in the audience.
@hostiusasinhostilityhostil78535 жыл бұрын
@@fenriz218 That's pretty insane. I didn't know he was Fleming's step-cousin.
@nicholsjoshua155 жыл бұрын
Which movie has the man hitting candles with a whip, throwing bottles of holey water, and moon walking up stairs?
@nyxshadowhawk5 жыл бұрын
Netflix's 2017 animated series comes the closest!
@bbsj865 жыл бұрын
@@nyxshadowhawk well until season 2
@kingofthegundam79745 жыл бұрын
I think the Coppola Dracula could take place in the Castlevania universe. The weird transformations Dracula goes through in the movie wouldn't be too out of place with the games, the idea of reincarnation and Dracula having a wife named Elisabeta who's death made him renounce God fits with Lament of Innocence, and Coppola's movie is one of the few adaptations that has Quincy Morris, who's son John Morris would go on to be a main character in Castlevania Bloodlines.
@Krystalmyth4 жыл бұрын
Holey water. lol I love you.
@spag47474 жыл бұрын
Holy*
@Fi_Ko935 жыл бұрын
Holy shit its like ive watched 12 movies in an half hour! So much work has been done for this 10/10 video!
@ivans.1915 жыл бұрын
I watch Dracula movies almost every week)). A couple of days I rewatched the Turkish version BTW. It's pretty good for sure)
@heinzerbrew5 жыл бұрын
Did you actually watch it though? I had to just listen to the audio. I couldn't handle the lipsync. It was very good to listen to though.
@heinzerbrew5 жыл бұрын
@Devonte Huntley When I watched it the audio and video were out of sync. it might have been you tube not the video.
@Aquascape_Dreaming3 жыл бұрын
It could be argued that Coppola's version does include Renfield begging for his freedom, because immediately after talking with Mina, he cries out to the Dr, 'Dr Jack! I'm no lunatic, I'm just a sane man fighting for his soul!'
@jamesh175824 күн бұрын
I thought this too. Also the point about Dracula wanting to learn English customs was in this movie I’m sure.
@-----------g-5 жыл бұрын
WOW! The level of research is almost academic! Well done James! Edit: stop arguing in the comments section... Fking nerds.
@RMJ19845 жыл бұрын
No research was done or needed. He's simply that big of a Dracula nerd. I bet you he knew all on this before even making the video. ANGRY DRACULA NERD! :P
@28Pluto5 жыл бұрын
@RMJ1984 You clearly don't know what the word "research" means. By watching all the movies, James did research.
@RMJ19845 жыл бұрын
@@28Pluto He watched them for fun. When you go and watch Avengers Endgame and you WILL watch it. You aren't doing research, you are enjoying yourself.
@28Pluto5 жыл бұрын
@RMJ1984 Wow, you *are* stupid, and prove my point that you don't know what research is. In order to successfully make this video, James did research by watching all the movies and then comparing them to the book. Of course he had fun too, but that's simply a byproduct of comparing the facts of the subject that he enjoys. Heck, even if James ranked the movies in order of "fun he had" he still would be applying his opinion to the fact-gathering (in this case seeing how much fun they are) while watching the movies. Example: If you eat 10 different chocolate bars, and then rank them in order of your favourites, your opinion will be based on the *research* you did by eating the 10 bars. You gathered your facts, and then made your opinion based on those facts. That''s literally what research is. Also, I haven't watched a Marvel movie since Iron Man 2, so I won't be watching Avengers.
@edwin51455 жыл бұрын
@@RMJ1984 He didn't know of the Turkish version.
@CaptWesStarwind5 жыл бұрын
Minor point, but when Gary Oldman portrays the younger looking version of Dracula, he has a moustache.
@re10105 жыл бұрын
Old man with a moustache.
@anubusx5 жыл бұрын
It deserves a point.
@dannyt35225 жыл бұрын
Capt'Wes Starwind but he ain’t old
@jaketheberge19705 жыл бұрын
@@dannyt3522 Maybe half a point.
@dannyt35225 жыл бұрын
Jake Theberge I can live with that lol
@Golem293 жыл бұрын
This is honestly one of James best ever videos. The level of research and enthusiasm is fantastic.
@TheSonOfTheDragon4 жыл бұрын
Something I feel I should mention about the Coppola version. While Dracula doesn't have a mustache as an old man when grows younger he does and Johnathan writes a letter saying that Dracula wanted to learn English customs from him.
@sXeblues5 жыл бұрын
This was a helluva brilliant discussion, sir. Now, onto Frankenstein!
@makaiev5 жыл бұрын
That should definately become a series...
@CraigKostelecky5 жыл бұрын
@@makaiev Considering this single video took him roughly a half of a year to make, I don't think that will happen.
@Frankenstein0775 жыл бұрын
Considering no film adaptation, with the possible exception of the Kenneth Branagh one, has even come close to the actual book, there's not really much point.
@jamieserrano8275 жыл бұрын
Agreed
@sXeblues5 жыл бұрын
Frankenstein077 I’ve yet to sit down and give it a proper read through... But, that’s interesting to learn. Thanks for the insight.
@scockery5 жыл бұрын
"The Dracula Dozen" sounds like a good action-horror movie
@M50A14 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a biker gang in an 80s flick
@anubusx4 жыл бұрын
Or a rock group.
@ChaseMC2154 жыл бұрын
Action-Horror-Comedy
@Superb_0wl3 жыл бұрын
The Magnificent Seven 🤠 in Dracula 🧛♂️ form
@thebrazilianatlantis1653 жыл бұрын
It would be fun to know the points for the 1968 television version starring Denholm Elliott.
@DrexandCTHproduction4 жыл бұрын
I think you could put it this way. The BBC 77 was the most faithful with the fewest deviations, while Coppola's version attempted to stay as close as possible while expanding upon the story giving more sides to the main characters of the story.
@billybhoy322 жыл бұрын
Yes, I agree.
@lyndoncmp57512 жыл бұрын
Coppola wasn't faithful at all. Dracula was an unfeeling monster. Coppola turned him into an emotional rock star. Totally unfaithful. Christopher Lee's Dracula is the most faithful in tone, especially the 1970 Franco film.
@neiltaylor5132 жыл бұрын
The bbc version needs to win just due to actually filming in Whitby. Even sat on the bench stoker wrote on.
@str.772 жыл бұрын
@@lyndoncmp5751 But never in Hammer movies.
@Buttcakes152 жыл бұрын
@@lyndoncmp5751 Bram Stoker should have thought of it because the original book is too dry. It's titled Dracula, meaning it would be smart to give the main character of your story some actual back story and character development.
@BlueScarabGuy2 жыл бұрын
Having watched a few more of these since last I watched this video, I'd offer that the Franco version is the one that most closely captures the VIBE of the book. Christopher Lee is incredible in it as a physically and dialogue-accurate Dracula, and the emotions between the characters are all very present. Really, the only thing it's missing is the real Quincy to complete its Fellowship of the Stake, as I like to call them.
@SavouryGalette2 жыл бұрын
That's one badass group name.
@Briaaanz2 жыл бұрын
The Franco was my pic for most true to story... but I've never seen the BBC version. It's now on my list to see
@mario1999235 жыл бұрын
This is my favorite content of Jame's. Just his own personal analysis. Not with Mike, or the screenwave guys. Just him and his opinions. Its like the good ol days
@johnalbertson795 жыл бұрын
Jame's? You can't be serious.
@turtleanton65395 жыл бұрын
Yeeees
@mario1999235 жыл бұрын
@@johnalbertson79 it was a typo, sue me
@Alamyst20115 жыл бұрын
Your point is valid. The other guys detract from the quality James usually puts out. When its a group the people tend to talk over James
@AdeptScholar5 жыл бұрын
No doubt just less time consuming to make videos with those other jabronies.
@bonecanoe865 жыл бұрын
Holy shit, the amount of detail you put into analyzing each film is amazing!
@TheRezro5 жыл бұрын
He is a Nerd.. well, d'oh ;D
@CM-kj6ps5 жыл бұрын
It really is amazing how much effort he puts into his vids, unlike most channels.
@sirB0nes3 жыл бұрын
The reason so many versions switch Lucy and Mina is probably because that's what they did in the original stage adaptation by Hamilton Deane and John Balderston. Both the Langella version and Dead and Loving It are really adapting the play rather than the novel
@ttintagel2 жыл бұрын
The 1931 Universal version was also largely adapted from the play, if I'm not mistaken. Which worked out well for Lugosi, since he had starred in it.
@dalejones65842 жыл бұрын
Thank you for mentioning the play! There are always going to be simplifications--at least in the number of locations-- when something has been adapted for the stage.
@WhistleMeThis2 ай бұрын
There was even concept art for a Don Bluth animated Dracula movie in the 90s. The concept art features images of a Disney princess-style heroine named “Lucy.”
@ericjones3878 Жыл бұрын
Correction...In Ford Coppola's version, Jonathan writes Mina telling her he has to stay with Dracula for a month to "tutor him in English culture."
@ericjones3878 Жыл бұрын
let me correct myself......'tutor him in English custom.'
@TheDRODOR10 ай бұрын
Ford?
@merrickmeyers26695 жыл бұрын
There actually is a single line in the novel implying that Dracula is indeed Vlad the Impaler. "He must, indeed, have been that Voivode Dracula who won his name against the Turk, over the great river on the very frontier of Turkey-land."
@gabrielwarren69555 жыл бұрын
I just read Dracula and I knew there was that reference I just couldn't remember where
@ajoajoajoaj5 жыл бұрын
The name is derived from Vlad Tepes' father Dracul though, while the inspiration vame from the son. Ironically the book itself got the name wrong.
@gabithemagyar5 жыл бұрын
In the book, Dracula explicitly states that he is a Szekler (Székely). The Vlad the Impaler connection originated in a book by Radu Florescu (in Search of Dracula) published in the 1970's.
@rembrandt972ify5 жыл бұрын
@@ajoajoajoajVlad was the little dragon, Dracula. His father was the dragon, Dracul.
@dm61826965 жыл бұрын
Apparently the reference in the book was supposed to be Vlad the Impaler. But Bram Stoker got the name wrong and the ethnicity wrong. Because he didn't know a lot about the actual history. It was a mistake.
@lukeskinwalker922 Жыл бұрын
Dracula is NOT killed by Harker and Quincy in Coppola’s version. He is mortally wounded by them but they were only the overarching cause of his death and not the actual direct killers. It’s Mina who kills him by decapitating him with a sword to put him out of his misery.
@brandonhainstock2928 Жыл бұрын
the romantic ending, love it.
@susanstorm7910 Жыл бұрын
Ty sis
@racheljames77 ай бұрын
He's already dead when she decapitates him. She kills him when she shoves Quincy's knife further in... what a lovely conversation 😂😂😂 ☕️🍰
@LouisTravieon5 ай бұрын
George Lucas recommended that to make it feel deeper
@paonippobemduro5 ай бұрын
Dracula was pretty dead by that point, Lucy simply freed him from his misery.
@thebadartist5 жыл бұрын
I demand a recount! Dracula is "old man with mustache" per book Gary is Oldman and is rocking the 'stache
@lancelemon88555 жыл бұрын
I believe the original text is "Oldman with mustache"
@TransylvaniaTapes5 жыл бұрын
@@lancelemon8855 LOL
@thekornreeper5 жыл бұрын
;)
@cindy4u995 жыл бұрын
YES! YOU ARE CORRECT! As a young man in London, he has a moustache! Please award another point to Copola!!!
@Dim43235 жыл бұрын
@@cindy4u99 actually its the old incarnation in the book.
@chairladysummer3 жыл бұрын
it angers me that copolla is so accurate in nearly every way but also has a love relationship with dracula and mina
@infjelphabasupporter84163 жыл бұрын
I actually loved Dracula's and Mina's love story in that film. While it definitely ruined all the evilness and even fear Dracula originally created, at least it added something new to the story and I was definitely rooting for them two the most out of all the characters.
@richardjones44663 жыл бұрын
@@infjelphabasupporter8416 New to the story? Check out the Palance version.
@stevewilkins24162 жыл бұрын
@@richardjones4466 That spoilt the story by yet again killing off Harker at the beginning like most of the other adaptions do, when Harker should be Drac's main nemesis as per the book & any adaption faithful to it.
@carnuatus Жыл бұрын
Idk I'd still argue he's pretty evil since it seems to be a result of hypnosis by Dracula rather than any real love.
@dannyb2783Ай бұрын
@@carnuatus great point.
@tmdbn5 жыл бұрын
"Then who keeps turning the lights on and off. Nosferatu" RIP hillenburg
@kalmah4565 жыл бұрын
The hash slinging slasher!!!
@Hurlebatte5 жыл бұрын
I didn't know he died. That's too bad.
@gleenfales5 жыл бұрын
@@Hurlebatte you don't even care
@Hurlebatte5 жыл бұрын
@@gleenfales ?
@ToddTheTolerable5 жыл бұрын
Yeah, but only the Coppola version was produced by Fred Fucks.
@patrickdolan65 жыл бұрын
Yeah, the book was very adamant in it's description of it's producer, and he did appear quite a few times, if only for minor comments and plot development.
@emerosky98995 жыл бұрын
@Carlos Saraiva r/wooosh _Help for the poor creature:_ Look up for AVGN Castlevania reviews.
@xotl27805 жыл бұрын
Who gives a Fuch?
@dubuyajay99645 жыл бұрын
OH GOD! FRED FUCHS!!!
@xotl27805 жыл бұрын
@Carlos Saraiva I like that version.
@thomas358355 жыл бұрын
Let this be remembered as the most thorough and definitive analysis on Dracula films ever done. And it managed to be entertaining as well!
@michaelavolio4 жыл бұрын
6:48 The "plague" in the original Nosferatu is actually just the vampire feeding on the town. The ship enters the harbor with its crew missing or dead, the crew member whose body they examine has died a mysterious death with a wound on his neck, and they think he's died from a plague. We the audience know the vampire killed him, but the townspeople don't. Then the vampire goes on killing people in the town, but they think it's a plague killing them. The "plague" ends when the vampire dies at the end of the story, because there WAS no actual plague, it was the vampire preying on the town. He's directly responsible for all that death - there never was a plague at all. The "plague" thread in the film didn't come from the novel, so on that you're correct. The film was made not long after the flu pandemic of the time, so it makes sense to write in the idea of a vampire killing people mysteriously being mistaken for a plague - a great idea.
@Blokewood32 жыл бұрын
The plague theme is also stressed by making the rat the vampire's signature animal. Orlok changes into a swarm of rats at one point if I remember right.
@danielvandersall67562 жыл бұрын
A lot of the German legends about vampires were very heavily allegorical--and definitely tied to the multiple plagues that swept Europe.
@hammerite6418 Жыл бұрын
Although in the remake dracula actually does release a plague on the town
@rexnebular5435 жыл бұрын
There is an interview with Christopher Lee he says he would have only played Dracula again if it followed the book
@phreakazoith22375 жыл бұрын
imagine Christopher Lee performing as Dracula with a moustache. He could have done it without being ridiculous but scary. No one else.
@merchantfan5 жыл бұрын
@@phreakazoith2237 He did! Look at the Franco one. It's a pretty bad mustache but he can make anything work at least a little.
@55bueller5 жыл бұрын
Christopher Lee truly was a one of a kind. I really miss the guy, one of the few actors that could scare me even in his 90's! RIP Mr Lee we all miss you!
@JurassicReptile5 жыл бұрын
He's literally shown playing the novel accurate Dracula in the video. He was really good in that movie.
@eachasteriod13345 жыл бұрын
Phreak Azoith what do you mean he could have done it? He DID do it!
@troyreeves265 жыл бұрын
Just laid down and watched this with my daughter. She bet on BBC 77 and won! Now I'm cleaning the kitchen on Saturday. Thanks a lot James. Great video.
@handsomebrick5 жыл бұрын
I have a feeling like James brought it up casually in some other video as an example of an unusually accurate retelling, so I bet on it too.
@Jacen4369875 жыл бұрын
@@handsomebrick yea my wife and I both bet the BBC '77 version would win.
@UncleNemmy6 ай бұрын
I voted on Coppola's Dracula
@ChristopherM17015 жыл бұрын
For the Jack Palance Dracula, you should have nicknamed it Jackula
@carterscustomrods5 жыл бұрын
He does "Võne ar-r-rmed Poosh upes. Võne... T-t-tooooh... Thr-r-reeeeeyah!!!"
@khululyp5 жыл бұрын
So the digital remaster should be called E-jackula? Ok, i'll grab my coat!
@RC99_Productions5 жыл бұрын
Draculance?
@aarontuplin5 жыл бұрын
Castle Slickers: The Legend of Dracurly's Gold
@thestwinner6805 жыл бұрын
Sound a little like _EDRACULATION_ though... ;b
@filmbuff27773 жыл бұрын
Great video. One thing about Coppola's version being called Bram Stoker's Dracula that people take issues with (because it takes liberties), is that he feels when he adapts a novel, that the author's name should be above the title as its their work. People might not know that, which is why I mention it.
@augustjologs15 жыл бұрын
Dracula: Dead and Loving It scores 26 points!
@Brandon30605 жыл бұрын
And gains another 50 for him hitting his head on the chandler rising from his coffin. LOL
@shanerone11815 жыл бұрын
Creatures of the Night...what a mess they make
@Geographus6665 жыл бұрын
@@Brandon3060 I must move the coffin ... or the chandelier!
@brianspoon50075 жыл бұрын
I was.... having a daymare!
@mancubwwa5 жыл бұрын
Mel Brooks will always be definitive Van Helsing for me.
@linkfan1605 жыл бұрын
THIS. This is the content from James that I love. I could watch stuff like this all day.
@rauschkandidat86555 жыл бұрын
time to watch monster madness...
@gamesonvhs59275 жыл бұрын
It really shows when James puts so much work into his videos. Very high quality content. Thanks
@pbxn-3rdx-85percent4 жыл бұрын
"But, but Lucy... I'm British." "And so are THESE!" Dracula: Dead and Loving It
@kejiri35933 жыл бұрын
My favorite part in the movie
@remivangriensven97953 жыл бұрын
Love that movie 😎👍🏻
@UncleNemmy6 ай бұрын
Poor Jonathan Harker
@johnieamca6 ай бұрын
Aahh children of the night.. what beautiful mess they make. Im count dra…..cula
@theangryholmesian45565 жыл бұрын
Can you do this but with Sherlock Holmes or Frankenstein?
@lwaves5 жыл бұрын
Funny you should mention Sherlock Holmes because Steven Moffat and Mark Gatiss are working on adapting Dracula for TV. No idea yet if it will be a close adaption or not but it's not modern day like Sherlock.
@tardis73955 жыл бұрын
(The Granada series would win for Sherlock Holmes)
@theangryholmesian45565 жыл бұрын
Yeah I've heard about the new Dracula adaptation. Personally I'm excited. And YES Granada would win hands down for best adaptation. Jeremy Brett is a legend.
@lwaves5 жыл бұрын
@@tardis7395 It's elementary my dear KZbinrs, the Granada series is definitely the best of all versions and the closest. I still watch my full boxset on a fairly regular basis. Jeremy Brett was indeed truly excellent in the role, in fact, so were both Watsons and all the supporting cast.
@Cybopath5 жыл бұрын
Sherlock Holmes would be a lot harder as Doyle wrote so many stories, you'd have to focus on one narrative like 'Hound of the Baskervilles'.
@DannyJane.5 жыл бұрын
I have been saying for years the 1970s BBC BBC version was the closest to the novel and, to date, I stand by that statement. Thank you for giving me proof positive.
@bruced.33554 жыл бұрын
Right on. Louis Jordan's version is the one.
@JaneEasterbrook-bn3ux29 күн бұрын
@@bruced.3355Same for me!
@rohangagrai1065 жыл бұрын
James loves his classic horror movies , doesn't he?
@foxmulder43185 жыл бұрын
Not surprising, seeing his love of Castlevania.
@Fedekpc5 жыл бұрын
Frankenstein is next XD
@ivans.1915 жыл бұрын
@bbarrera86 just like I am. If there wasn't Stoker's Dracula I'd probably never became interested in horror classics)
@jakomioftherose24345 жыл бұрын
Because the ones today sucks... no pun intended.
@Ashmo6134 жыл бұрын
Actually, the book does imply the link to Vlad the Impaler, referencing his war against the Turks.
@jessehernandez84193 жыл бұрын
Right. I was thinking just that.
@davidbanan.3 жыл бұрын
@@jessehernandez8419 yep same
@brannon53113 жыл бұрын
Yes, it does. In a speech by Dracula to die for.
@StedeBonnetsCravat3 жыл бұрын
@Technicolor Vision He was mistaken about the meaning of "Dracula". Dracul means "Dragon" in Wallachian, and Vlad the II and III happened to be members of the Order of the Dragon. So, quite the coincidence if he had no idea who Prince Vlad was.
@beagleboygaming17013 жыл бұрын
@@StedeBonnetsCravat exactly
@ShinoSarna5 жыл бұрын
I didn't know that Castlevania's character design of Dracula (grey with mustache) was the most accurate to the book. Huh.
@SoLinkSmash5 жыл бұрын
The events of the Bram Stoker novel are also canon to the Castlevania timeline, funnily enough, as the characters’ descendants show up in Bloodlines for the Genesis and Portrait of Ruin for the DS.
@DarkMirria15 жыл бұрын
It’s definitely interesting. :)
@johngleeman83475 жыл бұрын
I don't think Stoker imagined Dracula being 8-ft tall though. XD
@ruyman905 жыл бұрын
Stoker did mention that he was very tall for a normal person. I don't remember he gave an specific number but I'm always though of him being like 2m tall. Also the Castlevania wiki says Dracula is 1.93m tall (6f 4") bu i guess the artist took some liberties.
@Facade9535 жыл бұрын
He also uses the Lugosi look in a couple of games such as Portrait Of Ruin for Nintendo DS.
@thejackal0075 жыл бұрын
I really value these videos and your detailed synopsis of such subjects.
@elizabethashley425 жыл бұрын
You get a like for giving a shout-out to Dead and Loving It. I was astonished at how book-accurate it managed to be while still playing everything for laughs.
@darknessanddistance44694 жыл бұрын
I was amazed at how bad it was a comparison to Young Frankenstein. Adding Gene Wilder to the mix really made a difference
@TheArcaneMaster3 жыл бұрын
@@darknessanddistance4469 pfft. Leslie Nielson was brilliant.
@impartialthrone20973 жыл бұрын
"Netlfix, or anybody who's listening, you have an easy win here" Netflix - Has a Dracula show "Wait, not like that..."
@aniseadhikari16673 жыл бұрын
Of course it’s surprising.
@aniseadhikari16673 жыл бұрын
Also it’s surprising no one knows how many points NBC’s Dracula has.
@aniseadhikari16673 жыл бұрын
Oh and what’s for Dracula: Prince of Darkness or Scars of Dracula though it doesn’t count?
@carl_anderson93153 жыл бұрын
NETFLIX: What? To redo the story? Oops, I thought you meant "to ruin the story". Excuseeeee...
@i_am_well3 жыл бұрын
Dracula is a sucker....wait...what?
@SEAZNDragon5 жыл бұрын
What always surprised me about the Dracula adaptions they never fully utilize the original novel's use of telegrams, newspaper articles, and letters to help narrate the story. I wouldn't be surprised if there was a modern 21st version there would be Facebook posts and tweets replacing the articles.
@Laocoon2832 жыл бұрын
Narration through text is a cardinal sin in cinema
@calumbyrne59262 жыл бұрын
You should check out the independent film “found footage Dracula” it tries to recreate the story telling techniques of the book in a more modern way with journal entries and newspapers being replaced with Snapchat’s TikTok’s and other forms of social media formats that the characters would use to prove the weird things they’re seeing but as vampires don’t show up on video everything is kept subtle and left to your imagination
@SEAZNDragon2 жыл бұрын
@@calumbyrne5926 thanks I’ll check it out.
@thebloodyluncheon5 жыл бұрын
Honestly my quickest click for a cinemassacre upload (Edit: despite my profile picture I am a GIGANTIC Dracula fan, as well as Frankenstein and the Wolfman.)
@thepaperwarrior18435 жыл бұрын
me too
@ug3335 жыл бұрын
Ditto
@adamhenry67935 жыл бұрын
Jay's Son.
@mikeq7255 жыл бұрын
I'm...about... to.... Sorry... I just came.. lol
@adamhenry67935 жыл бұрын
@@mikeq725 Oh, Sweet Mike.
@Mathadar5 жыл бұрын
One thing. The Coppola version there were scenes where Dracula had a mustache including the day scenes. Just a note.
@willieloomis59585 жыл бұрын
Yes, but he didn't look old when he had the mustache.
@DaDoubleDee5 жыл бұрын
@@willieloomis5958 that's right he looked fresh as fuck haha
@thejedisonic675 жыл бұрын
@@DaDoubleDee What are you an Inkling?
@Alucard12425 жыл бұрын
It would ba a half point
@DarkestStarASMR5 жыл бұрын
Jess Francos El conde Dracula is the most faithful..
@michaeldailey32194 жыл бұрын
The most faithful adaptation I have seen is the 1977 one starring Louis Jordan.
@Edenwaith175 жыл бұрын
I’ve always wondered which of the Dracula movies was closest to the book since so many of the movies tend to wildly derive near the end. Thanks to James for analyzing these different versions to answer this question.
@yksnimus5 жыл бұрын
I guess they dont want to make the end predictable
@advancedraymondology29145 жыл бұрын
Seriously? No mention of Count Chocula? This is a travesty.
@navymusician8225 жыл бұрын
haha nice
@pacoramon94685 жыл бұрын
It was a parody movie, doesn't count.
@badideabearcub27475 жыл бұрын
No, Count Duckula is better.
@789syrus7895 жыл бұрын
Advanced Raymondology I THINK ADAM SANDLER IS GUD DRAGULA!!!
@pixiebubbles26285 жыл бұрын
I'm sure he'll get an episode all to himself 😂 Don't worry. Count Chocula will have his day
@zeldajunkielol25 жыл бұрын
A James only video? HECK YES! I love watching him talk about topics that he is passionate about.
@Torvik40 Жыл бұрын
I think the Coppola version should've earned a half-point for giving Dracula a moustache *after* he de-ages. So how many points does the Moffat miniseries get?
@vanillabatcave5677 Жыл бұрын
Ahh Moffat's Dracula, what a wonderful 2 episode re-imagination of the classic
@kenknowlton3085 Жыл бұрын
In the novel, Bram Stoker describes Dracula with a distinct mustache.
@filthycasual8187 Жыл бұрын
@@kenknowlton3085 Only at the beginning. He gets a pointy beard after he de-ages.
@jcollins13054 жыл бұрын
The ‘77 BBC version is by far the best version. Available to stream on KZbin, it has loads of class and the best actors, with a very suave and Subtle Dracula
@TheConjurersTower5 жыл бұрын
My dad is a huge horror buff and would get every movie with Dracula in the title, I'm the only one who actually read the book and I was blown away by BBC 77's Count Dracula. It really captured the atmosphere of the books, and I thought Louis Jourdan really played Dracula's calm predatory nature extremely well. It's by far my personal favorite for the characters/atmosphere and because I'm just a nerd who likes to see faithful adaptations. Thanks for such an awesome video! I love nit-picky stuff like this!
@lordioris5 жыл бұрын
I can only begin to imagine how much work an effort was put into this video, and it definetely shows! Well done Sir, well done.
@CraigKostelecky5 жыл бұрын
He said on Twitter that he had been working on this since last fall.
@HorrorsofCody Жыл бұрын
James got me into classic horror and now I appreciate silent/b&w movies more than modern cinema. Always loved horror but I had no idea how much more amazing the genre is and I thank James for making these videos to teach it. Great video!
@Bonbonbabies764 жыл бұрын
I loved the 1992 Coppola version. It took a lot of words and "scenes" from the book, but was also just stunning. One thing I didn't like was how Lucy wasn't the pure soul as in the book, but otherwise her portrayal of Vampire Lucy was amazing
@RumpelGnom424 жыл бұрын
I also did not like Mina in the 1992 Version. Book Mina was brave, intelligent, loyal and kind of a badass for a female character in a book from 1897.
@SamJohnnyVoices3 жыл бұрын
I was thinking that too! Was Lucy that promiscuous in the book?
@Bonbonbabies763 жыл бұрын
@@SamJohnnyVoices not at all lol! I still love this movie though. And vampire Lucy still gives me chills!
@megantouchton4636 Жыл бұрын
@@SamJohnnyVoicesNo. In the book, Lucy is a truly purehearted girl, who's genuinely distraught she has to turn down Dr. Seward and Quincey's marriage proposals. That being said, it's been posited that the fact that (book Lucy's) willingness to consider/wish for the possibility to have three husbands, while rooted in her fondness for Seward and Quincey (and her guilt over hurting them)--the fact she is so (insert sarcastic Victorian outrage here) wonton as to even entertain a polyandrist arrangement, even as nothing more tham a passing wish (shock! horror!) makes her morally "inferior" to Mina, and every movie since has taken that as a carte blanche to slutty her up. 🤦♀️
@007dalal Жыл бұрын
Mina ruined it
@75Veritas4 жыл бұрын
I never read the original but listened to an audio book and was shocked to discover how incredibly awesome the book is compared to any movie.
@nightmarishcompositions4536 Жыл бұрын
This is true of almost any novel, sadly. The movies never get it right.
@santos8468 Жыл бұрын
The best audio versions are the ones with a full cast as opposed to one narrator.
@kaylahensley1581 Жыл бұрын
The Alan Cummings version is my favorite. Tim Curry’s in it too.
@mumfnah5 жыл бұрын
I visit Whitby every year, it's a nice place, and climb those 199 steps to the Abbey. There's also a graveyard up top with one of the graves having a skull and crossbones symbol and the stone cracked completely in half... Meant to be Dracula's grave which he rose from
@christopherleonard2475 жыл бұрын
Dan Curtis isnt known? Youre discussing Dracula and didnt think Curtis was known when he created Dark Shadows, a popular supernatural soap opera with a Vampire lead. Barnabas Collins.
@tobi27313 жыл бұрын
The original Nosferatu does also honor the book being written in letters. Multiple of the title cards are letters. Though it may only be from Jonathan's perspective.
@therrydicule5 жыл бұрын
So... The best movie adaptation is... Castlevania 2 on the nes!!! What?!
@turtleanton65395 жыл бұрын
Lol
@sepnot5 жыл бұрын
Simon is my favorite character from the novel.
@handsomebrick5 жыл бұрын
Followed closely by Blacula.
@unwelldanny71085 жыл бұрын
@@sepnot This reminds me of when I read the book in school... I kept calling Jonathan "Simon" (ex. "Simon- I mean, Jonathan")
@CheshireCesare5 жыл бұрын
"This counts theatrical and television, but no... spoofs" *Looks longingly at Dracula, Dead and Loving It* ... Also, don't care if Nosferatu was basically a rip-off of the novel, I'm just thanking God it existed and, even more importantly, *survived*, and I shudder to think what would have happened if the studio had managed to destroy all the copies like they were asked to... The Spanish version is super cool, too
@katiebayliss98874 жыл бұрын
Honestly I don’t like Bram’s widow, she also published a story that he originally wasn’t going to publish after he died. I feel like she just really wanted money(I don’t believe in inheritance)
@tyrongkojy5 жыл бұрын
The Coppola version DOES give Drac his moustache, just not when he's old.
@JurassicReptile5 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't count that, his younger self isn't much like his younger self in the novel.
@Serai35 жыл бұрын
Yeah, but it's definitely not the mustache in the book.
@soultakersys5 жыл бұрын
why note, james said himself if it references it or mention counts, and young drac had the mustache @@JurassicReptile
@tyrantbossmedia22305 жыл бұрын
You are correct. The narrator even references the photo of Dracula with a moustache twice, when he is younger after drinking blood and when he is walking around in daylight. So add a point to Coppola. It should be BBC '77 (58) Coppola (57)
@kafkatrap68125 жыл бұрын
Never mind dracula's 'tache . Nothing comes close to the magnificent upper lip fungus sported by that Turkish-Not-Renfield bloke at circa 11:07
@jaimesamuraie3 жыл бұрын
I would sooo binge watch a faithful adaptation tv series!
@matban90822 жыл бұрын
I'm pretty sure everyone who watched this would :)
@Tebaun5 жыл бұрын
The "Lu" in Lugosi is prononced like Lou, and "si" like she. With love from Hungary.
@tressiemorgan89445 жыл бұрын
So Lucy but with a lisp 😂👌
@subzero86795 жыл бұрын
No shit sherlock
@Krystalmyth4 жыл бұрын
HE said it properly.
@Ponaru4 жыл бұрын
Lou-go-she?
@celticson5 жыл бұрын
Alucard, from Darktsone Entertainment had to cut a lot, because like James said, it would have been like 20 hours long, but it's director made it to be a literal adaptation of the book. Every line of dialogue was written by Stoker (well with some place name changes), almost every shot was something described in the book. It's such an obscure indie, I'm not surprise James didn't seem to know about it.
@kevinr.35425 жыл бұрын
I freaking LOVE when James talks about classic horror, especially Dracula. So glad he keeps coming up with great new content!! He delivers so consistently, it's incredible. He's Delivers like Digorno
@MagusMarquillin5 жыл бұрын
It's way better then the diarrhea on game cartridges.
@PaulHarrell2 жыл бұрын
This was a well-organized, very informative video.
@famousvoiceimitator5 жыл бұрын
My favourite one is the Coppola 90's version, and I really like the awesome music played on it too, including the song called Love song for a Vampire which is played through most of the end credits.
@FitzKeepsItSimple5 жыл бұрын
Well done, James. I can’t imagine how many hours you put into this.
@NerdyWillowTree4 жыл бұрын
Actually, in Franco's version there IS a scene where we can clearly see that Dracula has no reflection. It should have gotten a point for that too!
@mathevincent2209 Жыл бұрын
Yes, this is true. What an astute observation.
@alexsolomon7991 Жыл бұрын
Other than the romance subplot, the coppala version was quite close to the original book.... From Harker's escape from The Castle to how Dracula was finally taken out.
@UncleNemmy6 ай бұрын
I'm sure taking Dracula out was a pain in the neck ba dum tsss
@alexpollock69324 жыл бұрын
I can’t believe he missed “moms got a date with a vampire”, obviously the most accurate interpretation
@LuzMaria954 жыл бұрын
I love that movie lol from my childhood
@gregclarkreasons3 жыл бұрын
The Lost Boys?
@thisisnotachannel2 жыл бұрын
What about Mel Brooks' "Dracula; Dead and LOVING it!", starring Leslie Nielsen?
@kevinj.p.62772 жыл бұрын
@@thisisnotachannel It one of the 3 S's. It's a spoof. Spoofs, Spinoffs and Sequels don't count
@stephaniegormley99822 жыл бұрын
How bout 'Fright Night?' In that one the "Rindfield" equivalent character is very normal.
@JazzyWaffles5 жыл бұрын
Honestly I just want a full length series of James doing nerdy film rants like this.
@chrisn43155 жыл бұрын
I watched this for a second time now, and I'd have to say this is the most profound movie analysis / comparison I have ever seen. The amount of work put into it, I don't wanna imagine, but thank you emphatically for..! Awesome video - dare I ask for more content of equal quality, please? :-) Btw... liked (already) and subscribed (now).
@nachtschimmen4 жыл бұрын
I also enjoyed your reference to the comparison of the Stoker narrative to the 'found-footage' film which is actually the best comparison to the epistolary novel I've ever heard. Maybe if someone filmed Dracula like found footage film, put together haphazardly afterwards, you could evoke the horror of Dracula without having to refer to directly to the problematic story.
@SavouryGalette2 жыл бұрын
There is a movie available on KZbin called Found Footage Dracula, where they put together various videos that adapt Dracula.
@nachtschimmen2 жыл бұрын
@@SavouryGalette That does sound interesting! I'll put "Found Footage Dracula" into the search of KZbin and see what it turns up. Thanks!!!
@darkpinkgirl66842 жыл бұрын
wait wdym "problematic story"? how is Dracula problematic??
@evieblue9592 жыл бұрын
It's almost over this year, but you might be interested in Dracula Daily: a substack newsletter that publishes the novel on the dates given by the journal entries.
@nachtschimmen2 жыл бұрын
@@evieblue959 Wonderful! I'll check it out.
@KTChamberlain4 жыл бұрын
I would love to see James Rolfe apply this sort of breakdown with other movie adaptations on literary classics that have at least 3 or more movie adaptations like Frankenstein, Jekyll and Hyde, Peter Pan, and so on.
@brandonmyers54484 жыл бұрын
That would be awesome 👏 I would also love to see him review some of other Dracula movies that people don’t talk a lot about
@DistractedGlobeGuy4 жыл бұрын
There's only one version of _Frankenstein_ that even really *attempts* to adapt the book accurately-the one by Kenneth Brannaugh with Robert deNiro.
@johndalton31802 жыл бұрын
Is this a dagger
@hollymarg4 жыл бұрын
LOVE the 1977 BBC version as it seemed to follow the book more faithfully. Coppola's is a good second. Thanks for this...it's brilliantly detailed.
@tanxenx364 жыл бұрын
15:50 You forgot to give a point to Franco '70. Dracula is shown to have no reflection when he shows Johnathan Harker to his room. It was pretty blatant and straight forward, not sure how you could miss it.
@ChaseMC2154 жыл бұрын
I think he couldn't find the scene on time
@tanxenx364 жыл бұрын
Aye, I understand that may be a possibility. But when it comes to stuff like this, it's important to ensure you are pointing out the key points that count towards a score of consistency.
@jackdough81643 жыл бұрын
I’d like to see a movie series that did Dracula, Frankenstein, The Phantom of the opera and so on done exactly to the books! Even if it took multiple shows/movies per book it would be awesome
@stevewilkins24162 жыл бұрын
The original silent Phantom starring Lon Chaney was faithful to the book.
@jackdough81642 жыл бұрын
@@stevewilkins2416 it still wasn’t to the novel though
@tdugong4 жыл бұрын
Extra point for Coppola for depicting Dracula's hairy palm.
@Blokewood32 жыл бұрын
BBBC 77 has the hairy palms too.
@Spiderific5 жыл бұрын
I love the Coppola version. One of my favorite films. I saw it in the theater when it came out and the cinematography and gothic style alone was just incredibly beautiful.
@WaywardAce4205 жыл бұрын
I’m with James on not giving Coppola a point for having Dracula with a moustache. Oldman had it along with the full beard in the flashback when he was still mortal, and he had it when he was regaining his youth and with Mina, but since he didn’t have it when he appeared as an old man, it just doesn’t fit the critera.
@camf334 жыл бұрын
It should've earned half a point at least.
@dubuyajay99644 жыл бұрын
Young Dracula had a mustache.
@ShooterDaan4 жыл бұрын
I would love to see James do another of these types of videos but this time going over every cinematic version of a Christmas carol, but I understand its a tall order given how many different adaptations there are. I'd say its one of the most adapted stories put to film.
@curtthegamer9343 жыл бұрын
I plan on doing a video similar to that in the future.
@almightycinder3 жыл бұрын
Dominic Noble more or less did a video like that.
@dimension7prod Жыл бұрын
Muppet Christmas Carol would definitely be in the top ten
@adog46615 жыл бұрын
Lugosi's Dracula has the best Renfield ever. Respect Dwight Frye
@Deadener5 жыл бұрын
Tom Wait's Renfield in Coppola's Dracula was nothing to shake a stake at.
@sammyshehole5 жыл бұрын
Deaden “*dramatic gasp* Oh yes! A BIG CAT!”
@travishimebaugh83815 жыл бұрын
HUH, HUH, HUH, HRRRRR (best attempt at onomatopeizing his signature cackle; not very good, was it?)
@CountOrlok225 жыл бұрын
Dwight Frye delivers the most insidious and demented laugh when he's found at the bottom of the stairs in the ship. For that scene alone I will never underestimate him as an actor. That said, Tom Waits' delivery of the line, "Dr. Jack, Dr. Jack! I am not an insane man; I am a sane man fighting for his soul," is one of my favourite moments in all of horror.
@davidj.thompson5 жыл бұрын
I agree! Best anguished, insane laugh!
@HTownguy1004 жыл бұрын
My opinion is that the original BBC version from 1977 with Louis Jourdan playing the count was the closest version to the book.
@lyndoncmp57512 жыл бұрын
Except Dracula himself wasn't the closest. That was Lee in the 1970 Franco film.
@fuckthisstupidasshandleshit Жыл бұрын
@@lyndoncmp5751But does that matter? No.
@fullyuki5 жыл бұрын
Been anticipating for this video, thanks for the upload
@coletidwell280610 ай бұрын
I love all of this guys content, I've been watching since I was 11 with avgn and now find his opinions so interesting despite not being a huge fan nowadays for whatever reason.
@theshitpostpodcast25095 жыл бұрын
James, I just wanted to say that I am a huge fan, and I just wanted to say thanks for helping make my childhood.
@CHMernerner5 жыл бұрын
the moment when you realize james actually did made many adult's childhood better
@patronsaintofhorses17475 жыл бұрын
I remember the BBC adaptation well... It was 1977, I was 8 and it scared the crap out of me. And I was a big Hammer fan back then. Seeing it now brings it all back. Thanks James for the memories. Loved that damn version
@JaneEasterbrook-bn3ux29 күн бұрын
I was 12 and it terrified me too! I was 14 when I managed to pluck up the courage to buy the original Stoker novel and it blew me away!
@DonyaLane5 жыл бұрын
I congratulate you! This was so well presented. And so time consuming to compile! Very impressive... Dracula is my favorite book, and I feel that Coppola's version was a wonderful adaptation, in terms of mood and eerie-ness. I loved the costumes, too, because they matched the book's fantastical atmosphere. I even liked the origin backstory that was added, because it made the movie satisfying, independently from the book. The only thing that I didn't like about the Coppola adaptation was how Van Helsing was depicted. Hopkins played him as a demented weirdo. He was creepy, which did not work for me. Bram Stoker's Van Helsing was a serious man of science who behaved himself.
@williamlynnroden5 жыл бұрын
Donya Lane. I'm glad I read the comments before I commented this. I like Anthony Hopkins but he missed the mark in this one.
@JurassicReptile4 жыл бұрын
I thought John Harker was pretty bad in the Coppola version too.
@Usernamesdontmatter14 жыл бұрын
Sadly I don't think we will ever get a perfect adaptation of the wonderful old man who punches wolves.
@sugarbaby19743 жыл бұрын
I started watching this just for fun, then with intense interest, then got seriously invested as the count (ha!) went on and on. I'm a huge fan of the Coppola version and think it's one of the more faithful Dracula movies, despite the liberties taken for the sake of a forbidden love story, so this was like watching a horse race and gripping my ticket tighter and tighter as the final lap was coming around, LOL! I'm pleased the BBC '77 version was the one to overtake it, though, it deserved it, but I'm proud my Coppola horse did so well. ;P
@frankjohnson1235 жыл бұрын
Holy shit, James put so much work into this; very informative. Looks like I should get around to seeing the Coppola version.
@nowhereman60195 жыл бұрын
It's so stylistic and unique that it makes up for the so so story.
@thekornreeper5 жыл бұрын
I agree
@handsomebrick5 жыл бұрын
If you're expecting something like Interview With A Vampire you'll be disappointed.
@JamesSmith-vk2ky5 жыл бұрын
Coppola's Dracula is the BEST!! And it's so well done. It's up there with The Godfather Trilogy & Apocalypse Now as Coppola's best work!! Watch it now!!
@siren_section5 жыл бұрын
@@handsomebrick why would someone be expecting it to be like Interview With the Vampire?
@DustMan27045 жыл бұрын
Wrong! The most faithful Version is actually the Count from Sesame Street, the only difference is that in the Book he doesnt wear a Monocle.
@Facade9535 жыл бұрын
LOL!!!!😂
@CraigKostelecky5 жыл бұрын
@@Facade953 Instead of LOL, you should have replied with "HA HA HA!"
@vladtepes26675 жыл бұрын
He counts because their weakness is counting rice so thats why he loves numbers.
@vladtepes26675 жыл бұрын
@Tom S I assure you he wouldn't for you see I am Dracula well at least i am one of the versions of Dracula.
@cymes825 жыл бұрын
Oscar the Grouch is Count's minion. He disposes of the bodies inside of his "apartment".
@MISTAWULFY5 жыл бұрын
I’ve always wondered, what about the accuracy of A Christmas Carol movies?
@TehZach19935 жыл бұрын
I'd vote the 1950s one with Alaister Sim
@mvolestrangler5 жыл бұрын
A Muppets Christmas Carol. ..Just joking, I watched about 5 versions of this over last Christmas and wondered the same thing.
@stolenname945 жыл бұрын
I'm diehard for the Disney adaptation and scrooged was hilarious. However what I want is a really dark gothic version anyone have any suggestions? ?
@andrewgwilliam48315 жыл бұрын
There's a "Lost in Adaptation" video that compares them.
@gemstonegynoid74755 жыл бұрын
I love the 1999 one
@ThatGuy-a485 жыл бұрын
14:30 well for some of the versions that came out during the cold war that might have been hard as Romania was in the Warsaw pact and a satellite of the USSR during that time.