Which Sony 24-70mm lens should you buy for Full-Frame? Buying Guide 2018

[@that1cameraguy]

Which 24-70mm zoom lens do you own or are interested in getting? Affiliate Links to Lenses Discussed 🔽🔽🔽 Sony 28-70 F3.5-5.6 AMZ: geni.us/YSpL | B&H: bhpho.to/2JnfjOU Sony 24-70 F4 Zeiss AMZ: geni.us/35qFR | B&H: bhpho.to/2JVWClk Sony 24-105 F4 OSS AMZ: geni.us/En0crQB | B&H: bhpho.to/2Hygmus Tamron 28-75mm AMZ: geni.us/QrA4rn | B&H: bhpho.to/2r4Acaf Sony 24-70GM AMZ: geni.us/eeXRGnL | B&H: bhpho.to/2JiHaUh Sigma MC-11 Adapter AMZ: geni.us/yOlBC | B&H: bhpho.to/2hPCglp

[@fantomfoto]

Some good info here although I must say that with todays bodies an f/4 aperture really isn't that big of a setback anymore. 5-10 years ago losing a stop of light would have been a huge deal but now it's very easy to make that up with IBIS (slower shutter speed) or higher ISO that still produces incredible images. Bokeh would certainly be better at f/2.8 but if someone wants great bokeh they should be looking into primes.

[@charmerci]

I agree! For the super budget conscious, the kit Sony 24-70mm is a wonderful lens. I did get the Sony Zeiss 24-70 f4 and though it was a bit better, it wasn't worth the extra cost. I then went through a number of prime Rokinons until I got the Sony 24-105mm. I love it! Better color rendition and so much sharper than the other lenses I had bought.

[@trevorwarner6196]

I bought the 24-70 f4 several years ago, it is lightweight and the images I get are very nice 2:12

[@AllenFreemanMediaGuru]

24-70 f/2.8 G Master is my go-to workhorse. Have never been disappointed with images with it. Next is the 85 f/1.4 G Master. Creamy backgrounds! For super sharpness go with Sony 28 f/2 and 55 f/1.8. The 28 also has two awesome adapters making it a 21 f/2.8 or 16 f/3.5 fisheye! My travel lens is the 24-240 f/3.5-6.3. Never ceases to impress me. The 35 f/2.8 is best for street photography. It's the lightest, smallest lens of the bunch. Last but not least the 90 macro f/2.8 is great for extreme close-ups and good for portraits! All of these lenses are very sharp in my experience. (I have been shooting Sony A7Rii and A7RIII for 3 years, switching from Nikon full frame after 10 years-D4, Df, D700 and best Nikon glass).

[@AllenFreemanMediaGuru]

For extreme zooming I tried the 70-200 but its large and bulky. Right now I’m using the Sony RX10IV (24-600mm) with excellent results). Shoots great video also.

[@edgejourney]

This was really helpful! I just purchases the a7 III and I’ve been researching the various zoom lenses quite a bit. The explanations and comparisons made here really helped me. Moving away from my original choice of FE 24-70mm Zeiss and getting the FE 24-105mm G.

[@FrenchieFries]

i just got the 24-70mm gmaster and i took a few test shots. The corners seem to be a bit weak at 24 and 70 but at 35mm it was sharp. The center is sharp though. So was that blur on your shots the center? Or at the corners?

[@OptimaMrL]

Sony owns a 12% share within Tamron. This probably explains why the 28-75 works like a native lens, with the ability to update the lens firmware via the camera body. Additionally, it gives me confidence that Tamron will address any issues that can be fixed via firmware updates- like they’ve done so far. I can’t wait for a 16-35 and 70-200 FE mount from Tamron - they’ve applied for the patents already!

[@brotherted]

My two cents: For your next lens comparison video, don’t tell us, show us (images). Good luck.

[@DennisLimCY]

very good two cents my friend, but you are at the wrong youtube channel if you want more show. this is a tell youtube channel, that is why while i watch it on and off, i cannot bring myself to subscribe. talking head videos are meant to be this way. since there is nothing to show, i usually use such videos to help me dose off. lovely voice.

[@Moghster]

disagree because a picture has a lot to do with 100 other factors that you would not account for, like time of the day, lighting, model, location, so you can have a shit picture taken in the g master and a better picture taken in the kit lens if you aren't perfect. So it'll only confuse you. But here you get the details in technology which shows you it's capacity.

[@Jeff-jg7jh]

The guy is erudite. Very listenable. I'd lose the 1 thing, it's too much That Nikon Guy. A kissing cousin(figure of speech) of the Canadian guy that jumped ship. @@Moghster

[@Ralph7D]

If it’s picture example you after you find tons on the net. Be thankful for what you get for free instead of complaining over what you don’t get.

[@liambaker8189]

For those interested in comparing samples, check out these links: Sony 28-70 F3.5-5.6: www.goat.vision/?lens=28-70mm%20F3.5-5.6%20OSS Sony 24-70 F4 Zeiss: www.goat.vision/?lens=FE%2024-70mm%20F4%20ZA%20OSS Sony 24-105 F4 OSS: www.goat.vision/?lens=24-105mm%20F4%20OSS Tamron 28-75mm: www.goat.vision/?lens=TAMRON%20SP%2028-75mm%20F%2F2.8%20Di%20A09E Sony 24-70GM: www.goat.vision/?lens=FE%2024-70mm%20F2.8%20GM Sigma MC-11 Adapter on a sigma 50mm: www.goat.vision/?lens=Sigma%2050mm%20f%2F1.4%20DG%20HSM%20%7C%20A%20014%20%2B%20MC-11

[@ursa81]

That's an absolute no-brainer. You get the Tamron 28-75mm F2.8. Sharp and fast autofocus as the G-master for the price of the 24-70 F4.0

[@DejanMaleticDexter]

Put the variable aperture lens at f5.6 and you get fixed exposure through the whole range.

[@iTip28]

I own the 24-70 2.8 G master... It's phenomenal! It's fast, sharp, tight from edge to edge, colors out of this lens are amazing. Highly recommended. Thanks for your videos.

[@pablovi77]

It’s also overpriced.

[@dannyboy12244]

Pablo Villegas how so? If anything it’s abit cheaper than the Nikon equivalent

[@abc32119]

24-105 is just as sharp. If you don’t need 2.8 then 24-105 is the way to go.

[@pablovi77]

dannyboy12244 The Nikon DSLR 24-70 is less than $1,500 USD.

[@pablovi77]

Justin Tackitt the Tamron 28-75mm is the way to go.

[@Madmohawkfilms]

I bought an old Tamron from the 90’s in Minolta Maxxum Mount aka Sony A Mount, pop on my Sony LA-EA4 adaptor and it’s PARTY TIME $150 including 7 Tiffen Filters . Most of my A7 lenses are old Minolta lenses. The 70-210mm F4 Beercan is another steal!!! Minolta 90mm Prime. 50mm F1.8 like $40 Also a HUGE fan of Sigma’s Art lenses in E Mount.

[@kingghidorah8106]

hi, I also use Minolta lenses and I was looking for la-ea4 since it inherits the servo screwdriver of an A77II, but i have an A7IV and it's not compatible with EA4, AND la-ea5 does not offer autofocus with PDAF if the lenses attached are not Sony G SSM.

[@KenanConvey]

I shoot w the 24-70 GM on my a7Sii and it’s a work horse! I’ve shot several concerts, filmed several interviews both using it as 30mm for A-cam and 70mm for B-cam, as well as a lot of event b-roll (paired on zhiyun crane v2 it maxes out the cranes weight). Save up enough to buy the GM you won’t need another lens for a while

[@livinit20]

Kenan Convey I’ve been looking up this lens the last couple days... I have been starting to do some weddings and was tired of switching lenses back and forth.. Would you recommend this lens...

[@KenanConvey]

Dvchavero I would! I’ve only shot one wedding on it but I use it for live events all the time. That medium 24-70 focal length is perfect for run and gun shooting where you don’t have time to swap lenses. And it’s just as sharp as my 28mm f/1.8.

[@livinit20]

Kenan Convey Awesome. And thank you for the quick feed back!!

[@KaineMcAlister]

Thanks for your help! I ended up buying the 24-105. It is a killer all-around lens for a first buy. Since i upgraded from a crop-body, the depth of field is very similar to a 2.8 on a crop body.

[@dangernba]

What camera are you using? Isn't that lens too heavy to carry all day? Thanks in advance.

[@KaineMcAlister]

Rodrigo P.C. I'm using an a7iii. Coming from an 80d w/ 17-55mm it is light to me😂

[@ItsMinarmy]

My starting lens as well for the A73

[@alrestauro]

Thank you for that in depth review on all the lenses! I am so "WOWED" by the amount of information.

[@devilmaycry383]

I got the kit lens and the 24-105mm which i am impressed with it's sharpness and overall quality. My next lens will either be the 90mm Macro or the 85mm 1.8. The 24-70 GM is out of my reach for now as I have other priorities for now. Great guide 👍

[@HolyWater101]

StormRider2 you will love the 90mm macro. It is razor sharp. People rave about the 55 being sharp the 90 put resolves it. I have shit probably 10k portrait pictures with it! Also actual micro work it works great too!

[@Lastknight0]

The 85 1.8 is my favorite lens currently. Can't go wrong with it!

[@MeAMuse]

I can second the 90mm Macro as his next lens. It will depend on what he shoots, but it's amazing for macro, and produces super sharp portraits. The choice will be based on whether you value flexibility and sharpness over bokeh and low light performance.

[@insomniacs0]

How do you find 24-105? It's f/4 isn't it? I've been considering giving it a shot as it's much more affordable than 24-70 f/2.8 which is twice as much.... How sharp is it? Do you think you can get away without extra f-stop?

[@MeAMuse]

Kamil Glabik only you can decide whether you can get away without the extra stop. It all depends on what you shoot. As far as I have heard it’s a pretty sharp lens. Not used it personally tho.

[@richardpcrowe]

I am extremely happy with the 28-75mm f/2.8 Tamron on my A7iii camera. I shoot with an A6400 in tandem and will use a 12mm f/2 Rokinon lens (188 equivalent focal length) when I need wider coverage...

[@rga66]

At the time you released this video, I purchased the Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS and I'm really happy with it as an all rounder ! But today... There is a new contender killing them all !!! The Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN art ;-)

[@tatocreativo]

It is a very good lens, but it has no stabilization

[@rga66]

@@tatocreativo Yes but all actual Sony A7 bodies have IBIS so if the lens hasn’t stabilisation it isn’t a deal breaker for me 😉

[@benpearce2044]

I saved money and went for the 24-105 f4 instead of the GM and bought the 55mm F1.8 as the prime is super sharp but I still have a very versatile travel zoom.

[@jyfreeman9210]

Thank you Danny. Excellent choice of a review topic. It’s timely and very useful. Well done, too. I placed my order for the Sony 24-105mm after noodling all your good info. I use primes, Batis 25 f/2 and Sony’s 50 f/1.8 & 85f/1.8, for lowlight and bokeh. Tamron’s size and f/2.8 are indeed compelling reasons to own it as well.

[@violetm_]

Thanks for breaking it down. Sony is a whole other new system for me and so I'm having to go back to basics and learn everything I can about it and its lens. 😅🙌🏾

[@richardpcrowe]

I shoot my A6500 with all primes. The 28-70mm is the only exception. I don't mind the 28mm side which equates to 42mm on a full frame camera because there is little distortion in shooting people. I use this lens for family pics and for photographing the people who have just adopted a rescue dog from us. The IQ is just fine for this use and the variable aperture is no problem for me because I am usually shooting with bounce flash. The form factor is nice with the A6500 and you can't beat the price. I paid $125 for my used copy in mint condition...

[@maverickrodriguez7213]

Would love to see a similar idea for the apsc format. I love shooting nature and apsc gives me that extra range without breaking the bank of specialized lenses

[@obayedh]

Ah! At last!! I was eagerly waiting just for this video mate - thanks much :)

[@billbeto5207]

You stated at 14:29, that Tamron 28-75 has built in stabilization? I believe this is an incorrect statement.

[@ravi_oliver]

Listen again; he says it doesn't have built-in stabilisation.

[@itsjohnzamora]

I've been ripping my hair out trying to figure out which one of these I should get. Thank you for the review!! With the new 24-70mm GM2 coming out, I may pull the trigger on a nice discount for the original version. Thanks again!

[@TheDougSpot]

In variable aperture lenses, I always shoot at the lowest F-stop that the lens can do at its farthest zoom. That way when you zoom in and out, the exposure never changes

[@Kenjis9965]

Tactile buttons are also really useful for those of us coming from SLRs I think lol. I think I'm sticking with my gut and waiting on the 24-105 f/4....I loved my Canon 24-105 f/4L on film.. and will give up the stop of speed for another 35mm on the long end (I've shot crop since I moved to digital. I'm waiting on my A7iii to get here, currently I'm a 7D Mark II user with a 15-85 for the same role and I already grabbed a 55 f/1.8 and 90mm f/2.8) I also prefer 24 to 28 on the wide end (I was SOL for years on Canon because of that)

[@ignatiiagoujinski4229]

hey just an idea for your lenses review, add the lens name you are currently talking about in a corner of the video so it is easier to look through the video to check for a particular lens.

[@arminbreuer7968]

I have the 24-105, and I love it quite a bit.

[@Deminimis2]

If I started over again I would probably get the 24-105mm for my first lens. I didn’t have too many options when I chose to go with Sony but I think that the zoom lens would be a good place to start. I would get the body and the zoom lens and just shoot and keep track of my exif data. Especially the focal lengths. After a while the data would give me a pretty good idea of what focal lengths I had been using the most. This would aid me later in deciding what lens to get and add to my kit.

[@denyxrunner]

littlerayblue That's true but I would instead use the kit lens and buy some prime soon after. The 24-105 is completely no sense price for a f4. It should be a 600/700

[@jalexanderevans]

You should do some trending analysis to see what focal lengths you might be headed toward as well.

[@dangarcia5198]

I just returned the 24-105 as it struggled to focus during two important photoshoots. I love the focal range, but unreliable focus is unacceptable.

[@denyxrunner]

yeah but also paying 1.3k for a f4 is unacceptable... I would so like to switch to sony but the lens price are just no sense and stop me doing that swith... pretty sad because sony body are the best and the most affordable

[@ietekoeke]

I bought the 24 - 105 f4 and although the lens is very expensive, the performance is truly superb, but your right, 800 / 900 would have been more acceptable

[@JustMeChris]

Switched from Canon (5DMKIII) to Sony (A7III) and have used an adapted (MC11) 24-70 f2.8L II lens and my experience has been mixed. Focussing does work and images are beautifully rendered and sharp when focus is nailed. However, when focus hunts, it doesn't just hunt, it goes on a little safari and for no good reason as light and contrast within the focus area is more than adequate. In addition, not all focussing modes are available when adapted on the MC11. Lastly, the the weight...oh boy, Although the A7III is a little lighter than the Canon, the weight distribution with this lens adapted makes this combo perceptually heavier than when mounted on my 5D.

[@dangernba]

Very nice video, man. It's easy to move from the kit lens to the Tamron, however once you've experienced 24 mm at the wide end, it becomes very difficult to move to 28 mm. Greetings from Brazil.

[@redskinfaithful]

🤯 information overload!! Awesome video!

[@j.r.regenold9094]

I picked up the kit to use on a a5100. Works great for video, I am not a "zoomer" when shooting video. Usually use my gimbal instead. Hard to believe so many lenses in same focal length range.

[@joseeloyvargasleon3644]

Thanks for the info, I'm going to get the Tamron.

[@crisjansonpiers]

Fantastic review, clear precise and the best thing is it has made me sit back and reconsider a purchase I was going to make today! (That being the Sony 24-105mm 3.5-5.6 OSS ) I will perform a few more tests with what I have before I rush out and buy. I have the 24-70mm Sony kit lens for my Sony A7iii and a Nikon 14-24mm f2.8, the Nikon 24-70mm f2.8 and a adapter which allows most of the modes including Autofocus and the main features. The two Nikon lenses do struggle in low light with the adapter to focus, in that they sometimes search and I miss valuable images but other than that they are quick and VERY sharp. Thanks again!!!! ;-)

[@casianosd]

Yesssss!!! Next...which 50mm to buy please!

[@sayyar9]

jp.casiano ziess 55mm is the best considering to sharpness + range + price.. You'll never regret to get it...!

[@that1cameraguy]

Thanks for the suggestion

[@casianosd]

Ahmed Sayyar thanks Ahmed, I'll check it out!

[@rickyfrost8860]

I live by my copy of zeiss 55 1.8!

[@shawndean100]

If you need beautiful bokeh and like purple fringing, get Zeiss 50mm f 1.4 instead of 55mm. Otherwise DXOMARK score matters😃

[@MartyPollio]

Very helpful video, thanks. I appreciate that you can do this without the youtube quick cutting techniques everyone else uses. In other words, you can do it in one take.

[@EdExplores]

Currently loving my 24-105 lens. Great for landscape and events.

[@neilforrest8030]

great video - wish you could install the lens info as text when you are holding each lens up. thanks

[@bautistap8515]

Tamron 28-75 f2for video as my first and only lens for A7iii, good choice? Or should I go with Sony 24-70 f4, which has OSS, and 24mm, but sacrifice the f2.8.?

[@mattarcus9266]

Thanks! Been waiting for someone to do this comparison

[@nyax4361]

I'm using the kit lens as a f5.6 constant. yeah it's much slower than f4 or 2.8, and f5.6 have deeper depth of field. but the thing is I don't like the more and more common bokeh/blurry background as there are more and more full frame sensors with f2.8 lenses. I came from micro four thirds world, Panasonic GH series, which unfortunately only got a f2.8 zoom to be the shallowest depth of field option. f5.6 isn't that bad, a bit of blurry background when closer and zoomed in, and almost no blurry background using the wildest end is actually pretty good. I would say it's very close to human eyes, with absolutely dramatic effects

[@nyax4361]

btw I'm using A7S II, which doesn't care that much of a stop slower. and as it only got 12MP to begin with, corner sharpness and many many down side from that kit lens became less of an issue.

[@BookerLeslie]

glad i found your channel, I am using the Kit Lens for now and prolly for a while, but I love the reviews for my planning on next items.

[@sunj_av]

Great video, thanks for the info. Came in time for my A73 purchase and helped me make up my mind on the lens.

[@cliflowry9433]

I've had the Tamron 28-75 for almost 2 weeks now. Took it with me to a 2 day photo workshop last week and have not had the reported focus issue yet. However, I'm not using it for video. So if the issue is only in video, it wouldn't have been a problem.

[@tinyman392]

I came into the FE (A7II) with no FE lenses, but from the a6000 with many lenses. Decided to ditch the kit lens and pay about 125 more (225 technically) and get the nifty fifty. Don’t regret it one bit (though I don’t do video work).

[@davidwamback9000]

Currently own and use my older 24-70 2.8 Canon L with metabones adapter on a7R3 with great results across all focal lengths. The GMaster might give me better AF, but hardly worth the investment for me. Considering the Sony Zeiss 50 1.5 and 85 1.8 for additional spread and IQ. Probably a better investment for me. Thoughts?

[@bryanbahling2877]

I'm considering picking up this Tamron. Did they fix the AF issue?

[@sjm.photos]

2 lenses to choose the 24-105 and the 28-75

[@fayainz]

Nice comparison! Can you do the same for wide angle lenses? 16-35mm range would be amazing!

[@JessDemant]

I have the 24-105mm.f.4 and I love it :)

[@KetansaCreatesArt]

But the Sony 24-70 GM is now old, from 2016 or back right? How does it hold with the faster electronics of today? Are they upgrading the lens electronics each year?

[@anthonysamra7777]

This was so helpful....Thank you!

[@zolob2434]

Great review! Thank you!

[@IMDABROWN]

OMG I didn't get an alert for this posting! This was a great buying guide to help me to understand what I "need" vs what "I want". Thanks buddy, keeping my 24-105 and maybe add on the 12-24 f4 or get a 16-35 in f4 or f2.8.

[@hongzewu5435]

i have read many reviews and most of them state that 24-105 f4 is an excellent lenses except its price.

[@IMDABROWN]

Hongze Wu I have used my 24-105 to shoot basketball and it nails it with the autofocus. Tracks really well, the only issues are when there’s a fast break and I plan ahead and it has to find what to put in focus. This is shooting 4K 30fps f8 and focus is set to wide.

[@framefilmstudio]

thanks, what do you mean by "fast break and I plan ahead"" :D

[@IMDABROWN]

Fast break is the term for basketball when the player with the ball is ahead of everyone at a fast pace. Think of a runner in a sprint and trying to track them.

[@Yartin]

I have the 16-35 F4. Wish I could have gotten the 2.8 but it was about double the price.

[@chauhavu4465]

Thanhks , so much . I have Canon 24-70/2.8 . I want using this lense for Sony a7ii . Should I use adapter Sigma MC11 ???? Thanks

[@fabricebouvart3374]

I own the CZ 24-70/4, I am quitte happy with it Maybe a good luck with my copy

[@6gwilliams]

Thanks for your reviews here. I love my 24-105mm and am part of Sony Pro support, so I will stick to my Sony glass for now. Cheers

[@bnguyen112]

I am fortunate that I have not had any focusing issues with Tamron 28-70mm f2.8. I have the Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 Art lens which I have adapted to my a7rii. The weight makes the camera very front heavy. Great video!

[@semangatmembara]

Bao Nguyen probably you got a good copy, on what body are you using the tamron?

[@bnguyen112]

semangatmembara , I am hoping I have a good copy and there aren't any problems un the future. I've been using the Tamron on the a7rii.

[@schatzor]

I had the Tamron on my a7rii as well but it ended up with the Canon 24-70 2.8 II, also a great second value. And now I’m on the a7iii and works perfect.

[@bnguyen112]

Mikael Schatz did you return the lens? I'm going to use it for a another photo shoot and see if it works. My last session made me guess if it was in focus. The color saturation was a bit too much and the constant uncertainty of it grabbing focus made it frustrating. I know I can fix the saturation in post but being able to present sooc would be nice. I'll be sending the lens back if this upcoming session doesn't give me the results I'm hoping for.

[@schatzor]

Bao Nguyen ofc man, these things a ridiculously expensive! I don’t know if I did the right choice but so far I’m satisfied , it’s more expensive but after all, it’s Canon. Another thing for me was that the Tamron has Vc and that’s probably why the weight is about 100g more then the Canon. Those grams are important for me when I put it on the gimbal. I had it for 48h before I returned it so I don’t think I can say that I have fully tested it.

[@rsilvers129]

I bought the kit lens because that was in stock and the body-only was not. Now I need to decide if I should keep it just because it is so much lighter than my pro lenses, or sell it. Seems to be a good walk-around lens for when my 24-105 is heavier than I would like.

[@TAGxT]

Rented the G Master 24-70 2.8 to shoot EDC Las Vegas on an A7II. Absolutely a beast of a lens, but man lugging that around for 10 hours a night for 3 nights was a lot to handle. Im considering the Tamron for price and size. I absoultely loved shooting with the G Master lens but the price point is a little high for me.

[@HenryDelRosario]

This was so helpful! Interesting that Tony and Chelsea Northrup also use the A7III with a MC-11 and the canon 24-70! I have the canon 24-70 mark 1 and I am stuck trying to decide to let go of it or use it on the sony A7III. I might just get an MC-11 now! I'm worried about the auto focus a little but glad you guys found it useful!

[@serviola3]

Thanks for the video. The 24-105 f4 Its just amazing

[@TravelerKazi]

Wow nice video I love it thanks for sharing bro

[@jasminmalik3287]

Thank you for this video.....its the most comprehensive one out there!

[@Happy_Snapper]

Subbed, like button smashed!

[@amitkrupal1234]

Can you please make a video with couple shoot on A7iii on 28-70 (mostly at 28 to 35 mm) with single off camera flash(like Godox TT685s) with ND filter so that we can get beautiful sky without using HSS. I Have shortlisted this kit (A7iii+28-70,1xX1T-s with TT685s, ND4, ND6, ND8 filters) as my Mirrorless Full frame starter kit. I already have Nikon D3300 (its shutter life is coming to end). Doesn't have HSS, doesn't focuses well with ND filter.

[@fideoioioi]

You should update this video including the Sigma 24-70 2.8

[@Shahabbalamchi]

the best comparison video.

[@andreasgilgenberg5588]

i have the 28-70 kit lens and it is only o.k., it do not fit really to a high end camera like the Sony A7 range IMO, but for family or casual shooting it is......... o.k. if money is a concern i would better go for a prime lens as a starting point, even a vintage manual lens like a minolta MC 58mm 1.4 will make you more happy, then the 28-70 kit lens IMO and.... yes...... thanks for this great video

[@dangernba]

The problem is many people spend all their money on a top notch camera (like A7III) leaving no money for good lenses. Three or five years later they upgrade their obsolete camera, keeping their bad lenses. Image quality is a combination of brain, sensor and lens. The sensor alone is unable to produce good results. Greetings from Brazil.

[@360icon]

The 24-105 is Really Nice!!

[@MasoodJamal]

Can you suggest different bought ultra wide angle lens for indoor Real Estate videography with Sony ZV-E10 that I can search in my country ?

[@andyshin7291]

Awesome video. say if you own 25 mm batis, 55 mm zeiss and 85 mm sony, would it make sense to still own a standard zoom lens? I currently own a 24-105g

[@altrujillo3566]

I enjoyed your video - thank you. Most of lenses are Zeiss primes and so I am having a hard time finding a telephoto with IQ that approximates primes. Of course that may not be possible. Have you had any experience with the Sigma 28mm ART?

[@imranalijafar]

how about checking 24-70 zeus’s with a7c mark 2 for OSS

[@artmaltman]

Well done! Do you know whether optical steady shot works with non-Sony lenses? I have the impression that you have to manually set the focal length to use OSS with a non-Sony prime, and so zooms might be unworkable. But perhaps the newer adapters communicate the focal length?

[@nichaphatrongsiri1439]

What lens should I get for Sony Alpha a7R III if I use for photograph painting?

[@cristinacartwright53]

Hey! I own a sony a6100, Im looking for lenses that helped me shoot gastronomy, landscape, and sports! any suggestions?

[@senorfrog5605]

Would appreciate an updated lens guide for Sony a7iii or a retrospective of the tamron zooms for Sony FE? Please and thank you

[@N0rdman]

Thank you, but more pictures to compare so we can evaluate the pro's and con's. Is it really worth dropping the money on a walk around lens you are going to bin all results anyway? I bought my first zoom in the 1980's and first roll was absolutely horrible, soft, low contrast, all the rolls was just to bin and I quickly went all primes. I know the zooms, but not ALL zooms, are better today, but I can adapt some really good ol' glass with the LA-EA4 and save my buck if this lens is a bomb.

[@sayyar9]

I bought the tamron before 2 weeks and I canceled the order bacause of the AUTO-FOCUS issues.. However, Today I just the order again after TAMRON offecial respond about the issues.. And I'm really excited to have the TAMRON 2.8.. As always man.. Great review..!

[@that1cameraguy]

Thanks for sharing that. I’m glad they did respond to it.

[@dschapin]

how does it function for you?

[@michaelianmanlangit6920]

Excellent and detailed review 👊🏻

[@gravitymediapro]

I like your style and enjoy your videos. Great content! Thank you. New subscriber.

[@asadrasheed1672]

amazing video as always

[@itsblkworld]

So helpful. Massive thanks!

[@jaredmotopnw]

Have the 24-105 Sony and at f8 and f11 when I shoot outdoors I've been getting a lot of vignetting (and not a big fan of it). Wondering if this is normal? Thinking of trading it in for a 24-70mm. Hear good things about the Sigma art lense. And curious to hear anyone's thoughts on this -- have the Zeiss 16-35 and the Sony 85mm (which I LOVE). Thanks so much.

[@lokoearthadventures]

Jared Kessler A lot of lens do vignetting, when you edit your photos in Lightroom go into your camera lens profile and you can adjust your distortion and the vignetting of the lens! Very useful I do it on every pictures!

[@erikleypoldt8275]

As a first time buyer what is the best all round lens focal length? For say travel photog, street, and landscape?

[@kaera1291]

According to Sony lens compatibility site the Sony 24-70mm f/4 Zeiss needs to be put on [Lens Comp.: Distortion] "Auto". Any idea what this means?

[@Mrgunsngear]

great info

[@PhotoTrekr]

I had the 24-70mm GM, but it was too heavy and I sold it. I'm over heavy lenses. I now own the 24-105mm G lens. And I'm thinking about replacing it with primes.

[@RiccardoGabarriniKazeatari]

But what about a comparison between the sony 24-105 and the tamron 28-75? You've compared the tamron to the GM, that means it's way better than the 24-105 even if almost half the price? Please respond, I can't decide what should I get! Thx!

[@picnicsinspace198]

I just got my A7RII and I can only get one nice lens right now. Can you please tell me which one I should get? maybe a couple options for pricing and maybe brands

[@redskinfaithful]

Is the 24-70 GM good for portraits on a crop sensor? I want to invest in a full frame lens just in case I want a full frame cam in the future.

[@aneesh3d230]

I bought xpro-s, ad200+865s flashes, 24-105 G oss & 70-200 f2.8 with a7Riii, next year planning to buy 55 f1.8 & a 16-35Gm..

[@UncleAlpha1]

Aneesh 3D why wait, buy them now and shoot!

[@paulhayes7972]

My choices at the minute are: kit lens - £60 24-70 - £250 Tamron - £450 Any thoughts as all I have is a 28mm f/2

[@onlyvids]

Hello.now at 2019 which you recommend it for my a7iii to shoot weddings? Zeiss 24-70 or 24-105 ? I want as much wider can be

[@Deus_Ex_1]

He said he would be talking about the copy variations concerning the zeiss 24-70 later in the video but he sadly didnt concerning this specific lens.

[@mrraghan73]

Sir , i am using Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSS Lens ,this lens can use for portraits Day time and Night time? please give me a tips ..or i want buy 24-70/F2.8.GM ..thanks..