Get to know the differences and simularities between Gullfoss vs Soothe 2 vs Smooth Operator vs Teote vs DSEQ 3 kzbin.info/www/bejne/bZfHd5htppd1ldE What is your favorite Resonance Suppressor? To clarify and I needed to point that out in the video: Reso's frequency autodetect is not the same as pro q 3's spectral grab option. Reso looks for resonances in comparison to surrounding frequencies where pro q 3 simple looks at peaks in the spectrum. That difference is important and also is what makes reso so transparent.
@najinelson67422 жыл бұрын
Waves Manny Marroquin Triple D. Whenever I need it, it helps. And some TDR plugins have a resonance suppressing feature with auto detection, too
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
@@najinelson6742 thanks for letting us know!
@checktheneck2 жыл бұрын
@@najinelson6742 Triple D it's simple dynamic EQ with fixed frequencies, it has absolutely nothing to do with mentioned plugins
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
@@checktheneck and also thanks for letting everyone know that! I need to update this pinned comment to point out a few things. People assume too much without paying attention what it actually does. The amount of ''this is like pro q3'' comments is also amazing.
@najinelson67422 жыл бұрын
@@checktheneck I do not analyse plugins to death, more important is whether it's good for your workflow and production, whatever it is, more important is what you can do with it and whenever I have some unpleasant frequencies Manny Marroquin helps me, whether it's boominess, harshness or unpleasant resonances. I do not use it a lot, because I rarely have some unpleasant sounds, I focus more on the recording/tracking set up (mic position, room treatment, distance to mics and appropriate hardware gear and also correct performance with percussion, vocals, amps or acoustic guitars) . I know all of the mentioned plugins, but was not inspired to buy one yet, for sure they are also good, but especially Soothe and Gullfoss made it sound too unnatural for me. That's just my experience and opinion. Btw Manny Marroquin does not have fixed frequency, that's completely wrong, there are three knobs with different frequency ranges to cover all you need from low to mid to high and the best thing is there is no distraction by some visual frequency spectrum and you will have to use your ears, sometimes it's also good to use one's ears and not only eyes when it's about music.
@AturaxAudio2 жыл бұрын
That looks like an interesting little time saver! Cheers mate
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
yes!
@MM4F4 ай бұрын
I hate to admit it, ive used Soothe since its launch and championed it... For time and ease of use, Reso is smashing it, absolutley smashing it.. However, there are times Smoothe2 just needs to be used and if there's time allowing it;s a go to plugin..
@whitenoisestudio4 ай бұрын
its mostly when you need static reduction that reso works great. Soothe2 is ideal for battling changing and dynamic resonance
@Keroser19832 жыл бұрын
Amazing tutorial mate!!!! I agree that I would not say " KILLER " but rather a different tool as you have said. It really looks promising. Thank you for the video and also amazing thumbnail :)
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
Yeah it does that resonance removing really well. The right tool for the right job. right ;-)
@Beatsbasteln2 жыл бұрын
the whole selling point of this plugin compared to traditional dynamic eqs seems to be that it can automatically detect resonances in the captured audio. but everytime i watch a video about this plugin when the presenter attempts to vertically drag a knot it also wiggles around horizontally a bit messing with the exact frequencies that have been found by that algorithm. i suppose holding some modifier key locks the vertical drags? but if that's the case it should be made more obvious since obv everyone misses that feature
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
Valid points. Controls are pretty sensitive.
@VirtualVolition2 жыл бұрын
Yep, I own the plugin and this annoys me every time. Haven't read the manual yet though so hopefully theres a way around it
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
@@VirtualVolition I havent found them yet
@null-oband54212 жыл бұрын
Ctrl & shift keys lock vertically and horizontally
@johnghadimi2 жыл бұрын
Great demo and also the callout of "realtime" adjustment is the key thing to identify. I think this is great for material that stays constant, but for very dynamic material like vocals, most likely not a good candidate (where Soothe really shines)
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Yeah if you want something which is adjusting to the material, this isn't the plugin for you. Fully agree with what you say.
@djhofer61872 жыл бұрын
I love soothe, use frequently. But room resonances (modes) are static, they don’t change, whether it’s a vocal or something “constant”. As such, I often dial in static resonance removal when needed, which still tends to beat soothe for egregious situations with big room mode issues.
@teddym28084 ай бұрын
Well the auto mode didn't really work did it because it missed one of the worst offenders in the lower range. Once you fixed it though it was WAY better than a static EQ.
@palebluedotstudios2 жыл бұрын
In my review, I found RESO to be most effective if you widen the Q a bit. But! In their 1.0.1 update, I verified they actually did widen the Q a bit! The user will hear more immediate results now, so I feel better recommending it. However, it's still kinda buggy...I put it in the Smooth Operator league.
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
You could always adjust the q in Reso. Too wide isn’t good as well, that will seriously affect the audio in a negative way :-)
@palebluedotstudios2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio You could definitely always adjust it. But they widened the global Q slightly in the update. Plus it's smoother to adjust the Q with the mouse. Thanks for the great video!
@musicproductionvideos50192 жыл бұрын
How does this plugin tell the difference between a peak that is the fundamental or part of the actual sound... and something unwanted ? I mean if the whole band hits a big A chord... that root note will show up as very high peaks. I am confused whether it just finds the highest peaks... or actually helps identify "problematic resonances"? I have not read anything that shows me it does not just find peaks that poke up. It might be helpful to show a real life recording with some whistling/ringing tones or something to show it actually identify them and see it work. I own most of MTM plugins and love them... but I'd like to know if these type of plugins can actually find problems. IS the goal just to iron out the many peaks in a mix... or does it somehow "find" the ones that are actual problems. Thanks
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
''- Look for disproportionately high peaks in the visual display'' That is what the plugin does. The scenario you sketch can be seen in two ways: the band plays that big A chord, but their voicings are do well so every one play a different frequency. If everyone plays the same note i/e frequency that will give a buildup at the rootfrequency and that will reso see as resonance, and frankly, I would turn down that notch as well. If that chord results in an overall loudness increase without the root frequency sticking out, then all is good. In my experience the plugin can find resonance like fizz in guita amps easily, so that's very handy.
@baldmanmusicproductions1131 Жыл бұрын
As always, great review ... I'd love to know what your favourite plugins are ... maybe do a video on that ?
@whitenoisestudio Жыл бұрын
Great suggestion! Would it be worthwhile to know what mine are? I really think everyone should find their own favorites.
@Cefshah2 жыл бұрын
Great video!! And your comparison with "soothe", makes good sense. :)
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Yeah i thought that made most sense given what this plugin does.
@Cefshah2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio Indeed!
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
@@Cefshah booooom! ;-)
@bobless55172 жыл бұрын
Cool! Need this tool! Thanks.
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
and thank you for watching!
@smuram2 жыл бұрын
You can create drone sounds from the delta :)
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
;-)
@gorf1012 жыл бұрын
Soooo.. it's fabfilter eq3 without the eq..
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
Noooooo ;-) Pro q3 find obvious loud peaks while this plugin finds resonances in relation to the surrounding audio. You can see that the nodes auto created in RESO are not automatically on the peaks. If you go in manual in pro q3 you will get the same results, no question about that. The automated frequency detection is what makes this plugin stand out. It checks the audio differently than spectrum grab of pro q3.
@supersauceaudio2 жыл бұрын
In manual mode it seems much the same as using dynamic bands in Pro-Q3.
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
True, only maybe a bit simpeler to use. I prefer the monitor mode in Reso to find resonances.
@brooksvenuti74902 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio You could also place an instance of SPAN on the same track to do this monitoring with a free plugin as well.
@najinelson67422 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your great presentation of this new plugin. Could you give some information about cpu usage and does it cause latency? Thanks :)
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your kind words! Much appreciated :-) I measure 64ms latency in cubase and cpu usage is neglectable on my system. So very low. Also latency is only an issue when you use it realtime / during tracking. Normally any latency will be compensated by your DAW during mixing. I personally would never use a plugin like this during tracking.
@najinelson67422 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio thanks a lot, you are very nice. Yes, I asked for tracking purposes. I usually do not use such plugins for tracking, but if you have some latency heavy plugins on some tracks, it can affect all tracks during tracking. I track a lot and have a fast workflow, that's why I do not like Acustica Audio plugins, I do not like freezing and unfreezing later again to make some more tweaking or adjustments. I am going to demo it. Thanks :)
@Beatsbasteln2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio plugins that automatically detect problem areas in realtime, like soothe, can not be used nicely in realtime, because obviously they need to gather some audio data to make adjustments for lookahead in the background to ensure the best quality and stuff. but this plugin seperates the capturing process from the processing processes, so i'd argue it is very likely that it has a much lower latency, maybe even no latency at all, but it depends on the architecture of its filters. 64ms of latency means it's more than 3x the latency that is audible to the human ear so the filters are probabaly not of the lower latency type, but i could imagine them adding a low latency feature since that would make a considerable difference to soothe
@RRMUZIKINC2 жыл бұрын
Fab filter q3 node suggestions to remove resonance frequencies works the same no?
@sokoleski2 жыл бұрын
Fab filter q3 node suggestions ? Where is that button?
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
Not quite. Pro q3 find obvious loud peaks with spectrum grab while this plugin finds resonances in relation to the surrounding audio. You can see that the nodes auto created in RESO are not automatically on the peaks.
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
Probably meaning the spectrum grab option in Pro Q3, which is something different than how RESO operates.
@adrianocastaldini11 ай бұрын
Hi, just a question. I can't find a way to save a preset in RESO (without the help of the DAW). I mean, there isn't any "save preset" button in RESO itself, right?
@Vegan_Kebab_In_My_Hand2 жыл бұрын
A dynamic EQ (that's not specifically meant for resonance suppression per se) would be a better comparison than the static EQ example, but nice video nonetheless
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
nah, most people would use a static eq notch for that. just showing the difference in sound without comparing.
@Vegan_Kebab_In_My_Hand2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio hm that's true, guess it's inteded to be educational for the less experienced producers/audio engineers as well, in which case I have no objections
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
hehe. Yeah it's more the obvious difference. Dynamic EQ is very advanced for most novices.
@EdThorne2 жыл бұрын
Killer tutorial as always, Marlon!
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
Thanks ED! Short this one is. ( say with Yoda voice)
@Gedagnors2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!!!!
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
You're welcome! Thanks for watching!
@sokoleski2 жыл бұрын
thanks for this video...
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
Most welcome and thank YOU for watching!
@WaterRiver7772 жыл бұрын
Badass 💧⛽🦇
@777Witness Жыл бұрын
How much latency does Reso introduce?
@istominmusic2 жыл бұрын
Спасибо. Но не хватает сравнения нагрузки на процессор с другими плагинами.
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
read the comments here where i make a comment on CPU usage. Not relevant in this case.
@ScullyPop2 жыл бұрын
That's so cool. Still trying to be better than a novice. It's coming along for me, though.
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
Slow and steady wins the race!
@ABC-vd8tw2 жыл бұрын
DSEQ3 is better.
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
correction: In your opinion, you think DSEQ 3 is the better one ;-) And that's fine!
@retsmej2 жыл бұрын
dseq3 is the best !
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
Hahaha, you're favorite I assume?
@alectaylor752 жыл бұрын
Indeed it's not .....a CPU hungry plugin it is yes and more expensive
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
I prefer Soothe 2 for the resonance suppression.
@AlexReidStudios2 жыл бұрын
My budget is tight and now I don't know which one I need
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
What do you need and between which ones are you choosing?
@AlexReidStudios2 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio Now I'm between this one and DSEQ 3
@youngjdet2 жыл бұрын
Any latency when using this plug in? I've tried DSEQ3 and Soothe 2 demos but both create latency.
@JohnMarshall-NI2 жыл бұрын
64ms of latency. No good for tracking through.
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
This is not a plug-in to use real-time, at least I won’t do that. With offline usage your daw’s latency compensation should take care of any latency normally.
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
I wouldn’t use any of those plugins during tracking.
@Solid_Hank Жыл бұрын
I hope not I bought Soothe 2
@whitenoisestudio Жыл бұрын
No worries there ;-)
@polarramusic Жыл бұрын
when it will end ir plugin scene? Each month new "gamechanging" plugin, which will "change your worklow....bla bla bla"
@whitenoisestudio Жыл бұрын
replace plugin with ''screwdriver''. See no-one complain about too many screwdrivers.
@polarramusic Жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio ok, but its not so easy - you have to learn it and get used to new plugins,find "sweet spots", etc. In todays paradigma, when many producers are already doing much themselves - composition, mixing, mastering, recording, social media management etc, this wave of new software needs to be calmed by self discipline - not to install every new plugin, which promises something, again.
@whitenoisestudio Жыл бұрын
It’s as with any other tool ( because plugins are tools ) get comfortable with a few and then keep an eye open what may suite you. And you’re right, read through the marketing bs which only feeds FOMO.
@n3r0n38 ай бұрын
I mean can't u do this with any equaliser? That's what EQs are for. All these plugins sound so gimmicky to me I have to be honest... plus the entire idea by which resonance should be something to suppress is just bonkers... resonance is becoming the new gluten lately ;) I mean I can get it if we are talking voiceovers but for music u pay Abbey Road to capture that special ambiance... u buy a stradivari for its unbelievable harmonics and then u suppress them? Why would anyone do that (assuming these plugins CAN actually do that)? Wake up guys this is marketing, learn how to use an EQ and spend money on a music theory lesson fgsake ! Peace. Love.
@RayTheProducer8 ай бұрын
Love this! Can’t say I disagree. Resonance suppression does seem to be the new buzzword, and not all resonances are bad; after all, why do synths have a ‘resonance’ knob, and why do certain guitars carry exorbitant price tags? Because resonance is a fundamental quality of sound. Having said that, what these sorts of plugins are aiming to fix, are unpleasant spikes that are disproportionately loud, creating an imbalance (sibilance is also a kind of resonance, and we’ve used de-essers for ages). A good algorithm would be able to find those, and that’s where plugins like these live or die. It’s not going to magically fix a bad recording, but it might help you soften an otherwise clangy accoustic guitar or snare. Recorded music has always depended on technology. The march carries on.
@reddoo89367 ай бұрын
Spoken like someone who doesn't know much about mixing. EQ, doesn't always get the job done. Sometimes you *need* a certain amount of the "harsh" frequencies, so taking them out with EQ could hurt the parts that don't have resonances out of control. Yes, sometimes EQ does the trick, but sometimes it's more complicated and requires a more complicated plugin to fix. For example, a harsh hi hat frequency that you can't take out because it'll make the rest of the cymbals/overheads sound bad without it. Or the shrill of a bad room when certain notes are hit. Simply notch-removing frequencies can have worse results in the end if there's too much needing to be fixed. Also, music theory has nothing to do with mixing. Maybe wake up and learn what you yourself are spouting
@levondarratt7872 жыл бұрын
Finally please ...jerks from soothe2 been milking...overcharging without settling for $50....i stead 259.... Payback is coming...lol
@whitenoisestudio2 жыл бұрын
jerks? NAh. You know , in my opinion the pricing Oeksound asks is actually a fair one regarding r&d and keeping a company running. It's just we got spoiled with all these 29,99 plugins and more. Smaller companies can't keep up with that.
@levondarratt7872 жыл бұрын
@@whitenoisestudio true - at this point I'd be happy with 125, but you're right, we are getting distorted prices.