Why Didn't Voldemort Pick RANDOM Tiny Objects for Horcruxes? - Harry Potter Theory

[@Uncle_Ramin]

Didn’t Harry ask this very question and Dumbledore answered he’s too proud to store a piece of his soul into a random worthless object?

[@kiyotakaayanokoji9421]

he did, answer is obvious, this video is pointless

[@allthatishere]

When was this?

[@Uncle_Ramin]

@@allthatishere in the Half Blood Prince book, chapter 23: Horcruxes, after they watch Slughorn’s original unaltered memory in the pensieve.

[@jamieedwards6721]

​@@kiyotakaayanokoji9421 movie only potter heads will not understand.

[@zbanul10]

@@kiyotakaayanokoji9421not to people who haven’t read the books

[@martincamacho2444]

Dumbledore told Harry that Voldemort’s pride and ego couldn’t stand to have a piece of his soul in something of a random object

[@perfectyoutuber8557]

But that still doesn't answer the question of why he didn't hide them anywhere that is impossible to find, such as hiding it somewhere in Antarctica, etc

[@SebasTian58323]

​@@perfectyoutuber8557same reason. He's a narcissist. He could only use locations that meant something to him or hide them with people he could trust. Anything else wouldn't be fitting of a man as great as he thought of himself, especially since his real identity wasn't widely known, and most people wouldn't be looking into the history of a random half-blood student

[@agm5424]

I remember a top ten list of random objects Tom could've use to make horcruxes that no one would ever find or suspect and the one at the top was just an f-you to Harry that one being his parents tombstone.

[@HarryPotterTheory]

Savage

[@MichalJerzyDygaszewicz]

Harry would feel the bond with Voldemort near Tombstone. It could follow suspicious thoughts.

[@charleslee8313]

That's evil, even for him

[@grokeffer6226]

He was already "dead" by then.

[@54raynor]

Except that the tombstone was not in existence when Voldemort was making most of his horcruxes. Also, part of the horcrux quest was finding where Voldemort would have hidden these objects. For him to use the tombstone, he would have either had to take the tombstone himself (a clear sign it was being horceuxed to Harry) or he would have to leave it exposed in an open-air graveyard for anyone to see.

[@thestanleys3657]

Voldemort though he'd never admit it he loved Hogwarts the first place that he felt like home and he reveared the founders he knew there objects the diatom the locket and the cup are great historical items most would hesitate to damage let alone destroy

[@CaptianComet]

My head cannon is that horcruxes need to be made from an object that you have a strong emotional attachment to.

[@Slepepe]

​@RenQianXinghe said headcanon bro

[@madisonsosa21]

If I were to make a Horcruxe, I personally wouldn't put it in something worthless or meaningless to me

[@craxd1]

I think that the reason he used his diary was, it was his first experiment, after he decided to act, and it was the only object he had on him at the moment. He didn't obtain anything of significance until he visited Morfin, and killed his father and grandparents. Thus, he used the family's ring he took from Morfin, not understanding what it truly was. He committed both murders before he graduated. The rest of the objects, he stole just after graduating, except for Nagini, who he ran across as a wraith in Albania, and possessed at first. The deaths weren't really important, as one was an old tramp, and another, a local Albanian peasant, according to JKR. Bertha Jorkins was another, who was killed to turn Nagini into one. His father and grandparents were the only ones of importance to him, besides Hepzibah Smith, who he saw as having something belonging to him. It's debatable if he had intended on creating one with Harry that night, as it was believed that was accidental. Voldemort didn't know what happened that night, as if he did, he would never have turned Nagini into one, which made eight. Harry, then, wasn't really a horcrux, but some sort of possession by the shard that latched onto him. Voldemort had no idea that happened.

[@cathygrandstaff1957]

Yeah that’s a good point, in the moment of his death he may have instinctively used the Horcrux spell, something he’d become quite good at by that point, to try to save himself. However since it didn’t have a clear target it latched onto Harry. Alternatively he was planning on making a final horcrux with Harry’s death and would have used some trophy or other stolen from the Potters in the same way the ring was stolen from his grandfather.

[@patax144]

He is poetic, period he wanted each of the objects to have some significance

[@VomicaEmanio]

Forget the items used to create them, it's the locations that truly makes no sense. He could have used the Founder Artifacts and then hidden them across the world. If he'd hid one in a cave in the Himalayas, one deep in the Amazon rainforest, etc. (all locations hidden under every secrecy spell he knew) then it wouldn't have mattered _what_ the items were, because *no one* would have been able to track all of them down if they were scattered all over the world in locations with no connection to him. Instead he not only hides all in Brittain, his home country, but he does so in locations connected to himself. He created a treasure hunt, not an insurance against death. I personally like the way horcruxes are expanded upon in the "For Love of Magic" fanfiction, by Noodlehammer. Not only does the item used require a strong emotional connection (so you can't use a pebble, unless maybe if you spent a decade carrying around a favorite one specifically to make it viable), but it also had severe effects on the creator. For one, a horcrux was not just an item that prevents death but _a part of your very self_ so just hiding it at the bottom of a lake would have been just as impossible for you as cutting of a leg. You *could not* help but treating your horcrux as a part of yourself, and thus the location it was left at would need to appeal to you as a place to stay. And secondly, because the soul piece in a horcrux was static (the diary Riddle was still 16) it meant that parts of your personality also got stuck at that moment (meaning that part of Voldemort was still an angsty teenager with daddy issues, and this got worse every time he made another one, leading to the unstable insanity we see in him in present day).

[@olesuhr727]

The horcruxes have to be found again when needed, so easily recognizable objects give good meaning. Riddles mistake was to choose objects related to Hogwarts. Added to that, he was up against Dumbledore and his acute intelligence. A grain of sand or a pebble will disappear over time.

[@matthewpatrick7263]

A bigger mistake was having them all in England. Why didn't he leave the diadem in Albania, for example? Even if he was afraid Helena would tell someone else its location, he could have still hidden it somewhere else in Albania.

[@BioLegacy141]

There was also the problem that dark magic left scars and evidence behind. Ordinary, forgettable items would have affected the world in odd ways, and would have been traceable

[@tofu6433]

What happens when a Horcrux dissolves because of time. A book will corrode and disintegrate overtime.

[@zimmejoc]

as a rule, psychopaths and serial killers take trophies, and a horcrux is the most amazing of trophies to remind him of his deed. It would be strange to use a common item without meaning.

[@dannyrivenbark7500]

Since how the making of a horcruex is secret maybe to bond the soul to an object it must have some type of significance to the person

[@calebwhalen6482]

Maybe a part of the magic is that the item has to have value or meaning to you.

[@charleslee8313]

I've had this idea for months -- he should have taken a pebble, turned it into a Horcrux, and drop it into the Mariana Trench. I also had the idea that he could have chosen the moon. Think of it -- you'd have this massive item looming over your enemies, representing your intellect, and your will, and... think of what you'd have to do, to destroy the Horcrux. You'd have to destroy the moon! Do you know how much damage that would do to the world? Granted, he'd have to GET to the moon first, and that would be a major issue.

[@barbiquearea]

I wonder if it is possible to turn an imagine of yourself in the form of a painting into a Horcrux? With magical portraits having essentially a mind of their own and able to interact and even react when faced with danger. Not to mention some have been able to leave the confines of their canvases. This makes me wonder if Voldemort could have gotten an artist to paint his portrait, then murder said artist to turn his portrait self into a Horcrux. In such a scenario, this Horcrux could be practically unkillable, especially if his portrait is placed in Hogwarts among the many other paintings adoring the walls of the school. They won't be able to kill his portrait self without also destroying every other painting in the school.

[@VincentWeasleyPotter]

In order to retrieve your soul once more should you need it then you would need to know where and what it actually was! That's why no single grains of sand would suffice, especially for someone raising a war against the wizarding world, putting his own vessel at greater peril from attack and potential demise.

[@IG7799-c4u]

'And they could be anything?' asked Harry. 'They could be old tin cans, or, I dunno, empty potion bottles ...?' 'You are thinking of Portkeys, Harry, which must be ordinary objects, easy to overlook. But Lord Voldemort use tin cans or old potion bottles to guard his own precious soul? You are forgetting what I have showed you. Lord Voldemort liked to collect trophies, and he preferred objects with a powerful magical history. His pride, his belief in his own superiority, his determination to carve for himself a starting place in magical history; these things suggest to me that Voldemort would have chosen his Horcruxes with some care, favouring objects worthy of the honour.' Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, Chapter 23

[@teddyhh9947]

Losing track of your horcruxes is a pretty big blunder. After 10 000 years you might find out you may want to reunite your soul

[@josecuestas7246]

Answer: Generic Villanious Arrogance. As Voldemort though that as he will leaves his soul shards in some particular objects, he chose to selected personal or important items to be his Horcruxes, as manner to showcase his so called poweress and superior way. Making him possibly think that uses random and ordinary items, wasn't "proper" for him.

[@blackinese1207]

The graves of Harry's parents would've been crazy

[@tno895]

>Grain of Sand Horcrux >Take up Glassblowing >Embed your sand grain into a work of glass, display it prominently. >Profit

[@Azevad]

Another possible reason is that you need a strong personal connection to the items you are binding your soul to. The ring showed his connection to the Gaunts. The Locket, Cup, and Diadem were from Hogwarts' founders, where he spent his school years. Nagini the maledictus Voldemort shared a special bond with. Harry Potter was the person prophesied to be the only one capable of defeating him. Even the accidental Horcrux makes sense. The diary is the only one this is a little hard for this theory, but all it would take it that Voldemort actually used the diary to record his school years. Maybe he recorded important finding like his relation to the Gaunts, his connection to Salazar Slytherin, finding important rooms like the Chamber of Secrets or the Room of Requirement, and so on. Some of you might think that doesn't make sense due to the Diary being blank, but that isn't to hard to explain either. It could have been blank for many reasons, to hid the information it contained, to remove the connection to Voldemort, or maybe the part of Voldemort in the diary needed the ink to communicate, so it could convince people to open the chamber.

[@the_latinist]

We know that Voldemort wanted such a connection to his horcruxes, but Dumbledore attributes that to his personality. I don’t think anything in the books suggests such a connection is necessary for the creation of a horcrux.

[@Azevad]

@@the_latinist How much is really known about the requirements for a horcrux's container? Voldemort is one of two people known to have a horcrux, and he is the only person we know what his horcrux contains were. Voldemort also knew that some of horcruxes were destoyed, and he wanted his soul split in seven pieces. Why didn't he make more horcruxes? Based on my theory he didn't, because he didn't have a proper container.

[@the_latinist]

@ Very little. That doesn’t mean we are justified in making up whatever we think sounds good. And especially not acting as though what we’re saying is fact when in fact, it is baseless speculation.

[@Zero_Reaper13]

Slughorn did say you hide part of your soul so if your body is destroyed you still live on, however that soul is trapped. Choosing items that others may find would be a key to returning physically as we saw through the diary, it manipulated ginny and if Harry hadn't shown up in the chamber of secrets Tom would have gained physical form.

[@martincamacho2444]

Voldemort arrogance thought that the horcurxes would be unknown by only himself forever

[@raijyn2452]

I believe Sly Cooper put it best: "You exposed your entire operation because of your ego!!"

[@MrKevin486]

Ego and hubris. He thought he was too special and too clever to stoop to putting a piece of his soul into something that he didn't think were worthy and special enough to house something as special as HIM.

[@texanplayer7651]

More than pride, I woud say that since horcruxes are objects concealing a part of your soul, maybe you precisely DON'T want them to be irretrievable. Maybe one day, for whatever reason, you may want to collect them again. And given that you will live forever, that day is bound to come eventually.

[@joperhop]

Small stone, a random one, dropped in the middle of the Pacific.

[@I_am_Areeba24x7]

Omake "Well, the notes left for me by Dumbledore in the beetle the bard, voldemort has made his Horcruxes in some random objects, like some random small stone, however the notes suggest, that said stone might be lost in some ocean particularly Pacific Ocean." Hermione explained. "wait, so does that mean, for finding that certain small stone Horcrux we need to dive into depths of the Pacific ocean!"Ron complaint loudly. Sounding horrified. Fred and George just smirked at that. "Now dear Ronican, just enjoy your scuba diving there!" While Harry chuckled.

[@jason44231]

I would say that it probably has to do more with the rules of making Horcruxes. He had some choices but it was not wide open choices.

[@atomika668]

A worse flaw: Using something easily lost forever. The only thing worse than dying before you want? Not being able to die when you do.

[@jorgecarbajal8076]

Voldemort believed himself to be an exceptional being above all other wizards. With that way of thinking, it's only logical for his Horcruxes to be objects of comparable status.

[@Princess_Celestia_]

Some of the items he chose where culturally and historically significant connected to famous historical figures. Having been raised by muggles, he was probably banking on anyone finding them not being able to bring themselves to destroy such artifacts due to their cultural and historical significance.

[@jordancambridge4106]

Mine is the Sun. Also a black hole and a few other things scattered around the Universe.

[@vonsauerkraut]

But you will need them at some point. When do you want to pick them up if they are in the sun or a black hole?

[@rhuonaChanel]

It would make sense magically if each object had to either have some significance to the caster or be imbued with magical properties.

[@neondemon5137]

Hubris, it's always hubris.

[@54raynor]

Equal parts practicality and hubris. The hubris is obvious: the books make it very clear that Voldemort likes his trophies, and there are no bigger trophies in his eyes than objects that once belonged to the founders of Hogwarts. But there is also a practical aspect in that Voldemort would be able to check on his horcruxes if needed. Doing that with a pebble or grain of sand would be impossible, so while it would make it easier for others to identify them, the same would be true for Voldemort himself. And it’s not like he hid them in easy-to-find locations with no magical protection. I also think that he felt that he felt secure in getting objects from the Founders because he already had one horcrux that was ordinary to the common eye. While I believe the diary was a trophy in the eyes of Voldemort (I always figured it originally belonged to Myrtle), it would seem fairly common to everyone else.

[@DOCTORHEINOUS]

In the movie he disintegrated.

[@IG7799-c4u]

He turned into confetti.

[@PomLamb]

"He wanted to be remembered" That does not sound like a man who plans to live forever, Especially one who has such fearful grip and influence on the world. Who could forget a person as fearful to the point that many can't say his name without trembling in fear? Especially when when they would be running the world in the events that he was still alive. For a man of arrogance and narcissism this is a rather modest take. People with narcissism don't think themself as forgettable even after death and much more so for the living. He probably knew that somewhere down the road many would figure out a way to stop him. He did make efforts to make sure that it took a very long time hundreds maybe even thousands of years. He may have known he would die eventually, Just not this soon.

[@grissom2289]

Building off what you said about pride also brings to mind self value. As a boy abandoned with nothing, he found items of great worth that were directly tied to him at first. Then he moved on to others just as valuable to tie himself to powerful witches and wizards. He needed to give himself the sense of worth that he never had until he drew knowledge and power that only he could wield.

[@adailtonpersegonha]

the real answer is because that way the good guys wouldn't be able to win

[@barbiquearea]

If someone cuts their hand off and turn it into a Horcrux. Would their amputated hand become Thing?

[@tyrannosauruswrex123]

Very good video

[@martychisnall]

Arrogance, he thought random objects were beneath him and not worthy of carry part of his soul.

[@jimshine9734]

Should have used muggle items

[@skyhighdw4328]

Agreed muggle made objects are less obvious

[@barbiquearea]

Maybe their magic powers also provided additional enchantments to the Horcruxes.

[@RobloxFilmsAndAnimations]

If I created a horcrux, I would pick something small like a pebble

[@takasmaka820]

Helium Atom

[@allthatishere]

Nah, I'd pick a Gundam. They are near indestructible.

[@barbiquearea]

@@allthatishere What about a diamond? I doubt the Basilisk's fang or Gryffindor's sword are sharp enough to cut through them.

[@davidpumpkinsjr.5108]

It occurs to me that most of Voldemort's horcruxed were empty inside, either literally or figuratively. A ring and a crown, circles with an empty space in the middle. A locket, which has a hollow compartment. A cup, which has a concave interior. A book with blank pages. This doesn't really apply to the two living horcrixes, but I wonder if it is significant.

[@camwyn256]

Answer (before watching): Because of vanity

[@Mathewly09]

I'd use a random stick in a random forest in China

[@Mathewly09]

Good luck finding that one

[@barbiquearea]

@@Mathewly09 If by chance someone looking for firewood might pick it up, and once realizing it cannot burn will give it to scientists to study or be used by someone for a carnival trick.

[@ianfhtagn1349]

Cause otherwhise the Plot woudnt work

[@PrazgreenStudios]

My ideal horcrux set would be a Nokia inside the strongest suitcase in the world with a lot of foam buried many meters underground, the White House (so that attempting to destroy it would make you a terrorist), and a small grain of rice

[@andrzejzborowski4920]

Voldemort believed that his magic would protect them perfectly. Because no one could guess that he had created them at all. No one except Slughorn, but even Slughorn could not have been aware of that until Voldemort's first fall. I wonder about something else. Dumbledore knew where Tom Riddle's parents came from. He knew that before he found out about the Horcruxes. Why didn't he visit Little Hangelton earlier? He would have found the ring. Unless the ring was not in the ruins of the cottage when he first visited the village. Voldemort sometimes changed the location of the Horcruxes. He gave the Hufflepuff cup to Bellatrix Lestrange, but he had to keep it somewhere else before.

[@davemccombs]

A fallen acorn? So you'd want a piece of your SOUL vulnerable to a squirrel? lol

[@CampNou1999]

In the same style as J.R.R. Tolkien's writings, Evil always ends up defeating itself

[@benwilkins7949]

We dont know the process to create a horcrux but it is similar to the process of becoming a lich and a lich's item has to meet certain requirements. It cant just be anything. Seeing as the lich is most likely the inspiration for the concept if a horcrux we can assume some similar requirements on the items are at play.

[@brianmartyn2631]

Well I don’t think he was forgotten. His death wasn’t remarkable, but the fact that be caused so much in 80(?) years put him in the history books. While that doesn’t mean he won’t be remembered in fore thought, he will still be remembered for a while to come. As a real life reference, no one has what one particular leader did in WW2.

[@edt6290]

It would make sense the a object would need to be of significance to serve as a Horcruxes. Considering the amount of magic it would take to make one, and what it is ment to contain.

[@mecahhannah]

Awesome as always thanks ❤

[@skellytorb655]

Enjoying the content! Question tho, Between Voldemort and Grindelwald, who had the more convincing argument to rule? Personally i think Grindelwald's point of magic is might over us muggles i mean, you'd think more magicfolk would get behind that then a small amount of so called pure bloods.

[@saintzeroinfinity]

What if a Horcrux needs to be a man or beast made object?

[@kestrelwings]

It is possible that he needs an object that he can describe to a follower. Harry was a horcrux and he was present for the resurrection. Maybe he needed an object where he could tell his follower to go fetch it. I would put a horcrux in a robot, but Voldemort predated most robots.

[@jakem1983able]

I believe Voldemort chose those items for the complete opposite reason that you would choose a grain of sand. He chose them so the death eaters could find them and they could resurrect him like wormtail did.

[@Jedonai]

I think you cannot make a horcrux from something that does not have a link to you and deep meaning. It has to have some kind of connection to your soul for it to be bound to it.

[@patrickwilkerson1728]

Voldemort could have hidden the hocruuxes in places hard to reach, like in a cave on the moon, bottom of the ocean, center of the Earth, an so forth.

[@MichSciFi10]

Cuz he wanted to disgrace items that belonged to the founding fathers of Hogwarts. xD

[@Mohohoh]

Are you sure one can use a random object as an horcrux??

[@I_am_Areeba24x7]

Yes of course. The diary is a good example.

[@magicpyroninja]

You could use an item that no one in their right mind would ever want to or think to destroy something so loved culturally that people would never even think anything could be wrong with it, let alone try and destroy it

[@magicpyroninja]

Like are we willing to destroy the Mona Lisa just to get rid of Voldemort or the Eiffel Tower or some extremely important historical relic somewhere?

[@Karn_Yeet]

I think this mainly stems from the magic in Harry Potter heavily depending upon the individual and their personal interpretations of magic, for example Voldemort kills wayyyy more than like 8 people, but only creates 8 horcruxes? the math don't math, unless it had to be a particularly evil act to split the soul. For example if he was genuinely defending himself against some form of magical bandit, I don't think anyone would consider it "evil" necessarily as it would be more of a self defense situation. But killing an heir of Hogwarts in order to desecrate their family heirloom? pre fuckin evil to me. And I think that's the main aspect, they had to be murders (or simply actions) that Voldemort himself understands to be truly evil in nature, like murdering his father to create the ring. Even though he resented Tom Senior he understood that to murder ones own parent is an evil act in itself, therefore capable of ripping apart a soul even as dark and demented as his.

[@LilaKooks]

If he was a Muggle, he'd be a serial killer.

[@AlbanAwan]

One fanfic had a smarter Voldemort that used the space program to send horocruxes into orbit

[@nickfromm5315]

This was literally addressed in the books.. Riddle was too arrogant to store his soul in something worthless...

[@stuartwiner7920]

This sounds like the "Why didn't the eagles just fly Frodo directly to Mordor?" quandary. Answer: Because then there is no story. It would be done in the first chapter, and that's no fun. Trying to jam in other plausible reasons is a bit of a self-wank, I think.

[@HeraldOfChaos76]

God dude this video was actually pretty good I don't know why all these people are literally getting so butthurt over it there's only so much you can do about Harry Potter considering that it's been 22 years since the first Harry Potter movie as I write this absolutely certain someone's talked about this at one point but establishing universe is just as important as figuring out plot. I mean I literally wide awake at night wondering what the hell did someone have to do to make a dementor not in fear I'm just too interested😂

[@fatkidgames4381]

Simple answer....plot armor.....if voldy used logic then he couldn't be defeated

[@vaderkeytheory5992]

Voldemort-I don’t like sand

[@nothanksbro420]

Magic always leaves a trace either way in this universe

[@scottpage2555]

Here's one for you. Why didn't voldemort create a horcruxe out of his personal wand or even the elder wand?

[@bartlester591]

In my opinion, they’re a couple of sayings that fit Voldemort to a T. “ pride go before fall” meaning he’s completely arrogant and thinks that there is nothing that can touch him. And Arrogance and stupidity wrapped in one package

[@TheDriftingspliff420]

i would use a muggle tramp as a horcruxe.

[@darrellperrine7604]

What if the object has to be connected to him in someway good or evil? Example we know at least some of those are connected to them via body family heritage so there’s a connection there or Harry Potter. The connection would be he tried to kill him so hate anyway just a thought that tip for the spill to work completely. He may have to have some type of connection with the item and hand of some type or another.

[@mcdaddy69]

Also I think he thought he was too powerful and too smart that no one would be able to stop him and plus he's too arrogant plus all the other stuff u said

[@arvinjosephignacio930]

This is an unfair analysis. Only 2 wizards are known to have succeeded in using horcruxes, Herpo and Tom. After the discovery of the dark margic called Horcrux, many wizards and witches have tried and failed to make one, with some losing their own life in the attempt. Tom's choices may have been out of necessity instead of vanity or narcissism. My theory is that it has to be of great significance. Something that he values tonthe point that his very soul yearns for it thus succeeding the creation of the horcrux.

[@arinerm1331]

I believe you have reversed the order of creation for the first and second Horcruxes (Horcruces?) He first made the Peverell ring a Horcrux when he murdered Tom Riddle, Sr., and the Riddle parents. "In the summer of his sixteenth year," according to Dumbledore, he committed those crimes, and one's sixteenth year elapses when one is 15 years old. Tom Riddle was 16 when he opened the Chamber of Secrets and murdered Myrtle Warren.

[@Wham_BurgerLXIV]

Hamburger

[@barbiquearea]

Abe Simpson: "Ever see a sandwich that can take a bite out of you?"

[@drepics3194]

While I would have made a grain of sand a horcrux and have it drop down into the Marianas trench I would also make a phoenix into one good luck destroying that. Update edit: I'd also make the sun a horcrux too as you wouldn't suspect it was and you can't destroy it without ruining/killing all of life on earth.

[@シルバケビン]

A needle in a hail stack

[@nicholassmalley3026]

No one mourned him if anything I'd say they pityed him

[@purpledeer1]

Riddle didn't kill Mertle. The baselisk did.

[@JJYork-y5c]

It was because Voldemort is a straight up textbook narcissist, which was ultimately his undoing. Me and some friends of mine who are also HP fans even joke how boned the good guys would be if Voldemort focused less on the fame and prestige of hogwarts relics and used something impossible to find like a grain of sand on a beach

[@matthewrosenthal753]

Why does this need a video at all , let alone a 10 minute one? The books actually answered this. It was EGO.

[@jb888888888]

Maybe creating a horcrux requires something of value to the person creating it. Who cares about a random pebble or grain of sand?

[@rohr4243]

The books would suck if you couldn't find the horcruxes

[@vonsauerkraut]

He has hidden one in a nose that Harry still has to find .🤥

[@hiddentruth1982]

While there is no real evidence I say that it wasn't his first murder but his first murder to make a horcrux. If you remember he use to hurt kids .

[@purpledeer1]

Well it worked, didn't it. Long after V's 'death' we are still talking about him :}

[@Kozli1985]

Way too big ego to put parts of his soul into worthless objects like sand

[@takasmaka820]

He should put part of his soul into a bitcoin

[@Lupinemancer87]

Short answer: Ego.

[@matthewmaxfield8443]

short version: ego, anyone who would do this to themselves have too much ego to put a part of their soul into a small meaningless object

[@Edanodon2]

Why didn’t he make himself a horckruxes