Why Harry Potter should be 2D animated.

  Рет қаралды 493

Jennifer Sim

Jennifer Sim

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 9
@robbybobby4524
@robbybobby4524 8 ай бұрын
I completely agree with you!
@wariolandgoldpiramid
@wariolandgoldpiramid 8 ай бұрын
If the new HBO Max reboot were 2D animated, that'd be a fresh take, and I'd be much more excited for it. This was a nice video. You make a lot of great points here. Good editing too. I'd be interested in hearing you talk more about the potential for a HP reboot - or rather, a new adaptation of the books. What can be done with it, what lessons they can learn from the movies, and what can be done better.
@Kille483
@Kille483 8 ай бұрын
I was wondering where this one had gone 😀
@scribe951
@scribe951 Ай бұрын
Well damn, now I can't help but want this 😭 I started reading the books before I discovered the movies so my first visuals of the story were all Mary Grandpre's illustrations for the Scholastic books. I remember thinking how awesome it would be if HP was an animated tv series, because that's kinda what I grew up watching.
@AnywayJenniferSim
@AnywayJenniferSim Ай бұрын
Mary Grandpre’s art had a HUGE influence on my vision of Harry Potters world! I used a lot of them in my video for that reason, it’s how I imagined it.
@savannahlevy97
@savannahlevy97 5 ай бұрын
I think so many things would be better 2D animated. But it takes so much work and money and these days efficiency matters so much more than art. And yeah, movies with magic and sparkly transformations and diverse creatures and lots of color get so much more whimsical and full of wonder when they are drawn out by hand instead of being "puppetted" in cgi or acted out in live action in a set. We kind of abandoned that feeling in animation altogether because they think everyone prefers realism now. :/
@wilczarek
@wilczarek 8 ай бұрын
I'm sorry but you literally have done almost no research on animation. Your knowledge is mainly based on stereotypes. It's much more difficult, time-consuming and expensive than you think. Live action is more profitable for creators, especially when they plan to make 8 films, and the only audience who would watch these 2D animations would be children or Harry Potter fans, so they would make much less money. The Harry Potter movies wouldn't be replayed on TV every year like they are now. You think it's just one factor influencing this decision, but it's much more than that, which is why I don't think you're educated enough to talk about it.
@AnywayJenniferSim
@AnywayJenniferSim Ай бұрын
Could you help me understand where I went wrong? I’ve considered talking more about how Harry Potter would be great 2D animated but would hate to spread misinformation. I feel like I’ve done a lot of looking into how animation works. What research can I do that will properly educate me?
@wilczarek
@wilczarek Ай бұрын
I explained everything u need to know in my previous comment. I know u prefer the 2D project more but u gotta think about the profits first.
99.9% IMPOSSIBLE
00:24
STORROR
Рет қаралды 31 МЛН
Are these free drawing apps worth it? (for PC)
23:49
pikat
Рет қаралды 271 М.
The ULTIMATE Guide to Writing Flawed Characters
14:23
Jean K. Silver
Рет қаралды 95
The Creator of Winx Made a Mermaid Show
25:31
Negative Legend
Рет қаралды 115 М.
How the Harry Potter Movies Failed Ron Weasley!
22:51
meninogui
Рет қаралды 148
Books and movies are completely different mediums.
21:22
Jennifer Sim
Рет қаралды 454
Some things I loved about Mirabel from Encanto!
7:51
Jennifer Sim
Рет қаралды 690
What is (and is not) Young Adult Literature?
21:18
Online School of Pop Culture
Рет қаралды 19