Why I Am A Political Hindu

In this monologue, Kushal tries to explain the importance of being a political Hindu. What is a political Hindu? How is a political Hindu different from a normal/regular Hindu?
#Hindutva #PoliticalHindu #carvakapodcast
------------------------------------------------------------
Listen to the podcasts on:
SoundCloud: / kushal-mehra-99891819
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/1rVcDV3...
Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Stitcher: www.stitcher.com/show/the-car...
------------------------------------------------------------
Support The Cārvāka Podcast:
Become a Member on KZbin: / the cārvāka podcast
Become a Member on Patreon: / carvaka
UPI: kushalmehra@icici
To buy The Carvaka Podcast Exclusive Merch please visit: kushalmehra.com/shop
------------------------------------------------------------
Follow Kushal:
Twitter: kushal_mehra?ref_...
Facebook: / kushalmehraofficial
Instagram: thecarvakap...
Koo: www.kooapp.com/profile/kushal...
Inquiries: kushalmehra.com/
Feedback: [e-mail]
00:00:00 - Intro
00:09:19 - My definition of a Political Hindu
00:16:01 - The Idealogues behind the Politican Hindu
00:20:25 - When not a Political Hindu
00:26:50 - Why are you a Hindu ?
00:31:21 - No other option but BJP
00:38:16 - The 200 year movement
00:40:00 - QnA

[@shiladityabanerjee5210]

"nobody understands Hindu society like Savarkar does".....THE BEST AND MOST APT LINE EVER ❤️

[@agnisekharbanerjee3852]

True sir

[@punyashloka4946]

I am a political hindu but I am hopeless with hindus they don't want to accept people like us sadly.

[@Ragd0ll1337]

Do what Kushal said - stop whining, start doing

[@tanmay.bharambe]

💯

[@sachinjshenoy]

A political hindu does not whine.......they just do things. I like that.👍

[@kedar522]

Really well said, Kushal. I think everyone should read 'Essentials of Hindutva' by Savarkar. It's a must watch for all people living in the Sindhu River.

[@Nsank29]

People are living in the Sindhu river? Stop glorifying Sawarkar just because you are a Brahmin

[@PHDheerajSharma]

@@Nsank29 your bias against brahmins tells about your school of thought sir

[@Nsank29]

@@PHDheerajSharma Brahmins are no greater beings to be treated with pomp and vigour. They are just like other human beings and they also eventually die. Nobody hates by birth. People are hated for their deeds thoughts actions.

[@PHDheerajSharma]

@@Nsank29 That is true, but brahmins were given that status because of knowledge of scriptures they had. In today's world it's called hierarchy. A Noble laureate and a murderer are humans but they are different from each other without any doubt. That was the base of Varna system.

[@PHDheerajSharma]

@@Nsank29 it's not the individual in Brahmins who was treated with respect but the knowledge he had. We don't know what kind of person Sachin is but we respect him for his game. This was the basic concept. But no doubt people misused the power and started discrimination. But usko kuriti bolte hain, dharm ki books mein kuriti nhi hai na hi discrimination

[@smoky3302]

Manipur is not Christian majority state . it has slightly more hindus with indigenous tribal religion .

[@smoky3302]

@विष्णुकांत सिंधुसुत manipuri hindus are not because I have been there and met them. Hinduism in Manipur came only in 16 or 17th century and they belive only in vaishnavism .

[@abi-wg4jt]

@@smoky3302 yes Mirabai chanu she is a proud Hindu and he is a hanuman bhakt and she is from Manipur

[@harshhooda]

Political Hindu : 1) Mutual Respect 2) Reciprocity 3) Krishna's Non Violence

[@Dragon-yv3wt]

Thanks! Well said Kushal. Learned a lot from this.

[@GirijaDD]

Lovely exposition on Political Hindu. There is so much clarity in your approach. Love it. Liked your TShirts too. The messages on them.

[@adish7839]

Create another organisation which unites Dalits, lower castes and upper class together. This is the only solution and slap to leftist ecosystem

[@shubhamdubey9561]

Ambedkar follower will never be satisfied open caste should have demanded the seperate country in 1947

[@amankumardas7120]

That's what hinduvata forces are doing

[@natalkumar6132]

RSS is that and it's a failure in some aspects and a success in others. You aren't still able to understand the problem. The problem isn't organisations. The problem is the lack of manufacturing. Unless we don't get rid of compliances, corrupt judges, IAS, Police, Army Generals, Air Marshalls, and Navy Admirals, we are headed for the worst period ever. Economics solves societies not bullshit like nonprofit organisations.

[@satyam4827]

Can we officially leave our caste and live just as a Hindu? Should we promote this idea to remove caste system?

[@shashiaaravpatel8928]

I have better option than .... Gov should encourage people to leave their caste based surname or somehow they ban to use it.... If opposition opposes this then publicly they'll faces humiliation as they consider themselves as pioneer for not doing caste based election and the same time unnecessary pride between the community also resolved the cessation of hierarchy of the caste based system and everyone ll be in the same rank..

[@monkshandilya]

Kushal : Just brilliant 🙏🙏

[@rajeevranjan8680]

Jai Hind 🇮🇳🚩

[@sankalp3513]

Didn't mince your words and great clarity! Thanks Kushal and keep up the great work

[@Enlightened23]

hope God will be our side, we will survive and thrive

[@jasidoald512]

hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope hope...

[@radhaganesh1805]

Brilliant Kushal. Absolutely agree with you. Thank you🙏

[@shivanshvish4879]

Savarkar and Baba Saheb Ambedkar worked together on this issue and they both figured out the root cause of Hindu or Indian society. But Savarkar worked harder on this pervasive issue of India. Pointed out the problems and yielded effective solutions for them. For ex. Savarkar told that Hindu isn't just limited to one particular country. Hindu is an indic faith, faith on Sanatan Dharma. One can be from any part of the world to believe in Indic faith. I completely agreed to you on casteism, because I'm seeing division withy bare eyes in my locality. People have to leave their pride of surname behind. If people still don't see the problems of losing actual Hindu. Then, there's not much to say but to watch tearing apart.

[@tanmaysalunkhe4483]

Not together but ultimately for same cause

[@bababistril]

I've also started to see some bruhmins justify birth based bruhmin "superiority" by misappropriation of the iq, race and gene theory .. and not to mention caste pride instagram pages .. need to fight caste pride in all hierarchies of caste

[@shivanshvish4879]

@@bababistril We need not to fight because it's taking us nowhere but unintentionally encouraging division. We just need to preach the reality and come down to the fact that society has been exploited and choose to remain exploited for no reason. So the ultimate solution is to abolish the whole system and uproot system from mentality.

[@bababistril]

​​@@shivanshvish4879 by fight I meant the same thing that you explained😅

[@tanmaysalunkhe4483]

@@bababistril right...

[@viswanathanseshadri1047]

bravo Kushal, for being so upfront. Agree with everything you said 👍

[@sayanpr6534]

Such a good video. Keep it up sir.

[@KaalBhairav-oo3mk]

Hare krishna..... 🙏🙏🙏হরে কৃষ্ণ 🙏🙏🙏 jai shree ram.... 🙏🙏🙏 jai sita ram.....🙏🙏🙏 jai bajrangbali.....🙏🙏🙏

[@ajaysinghsolanki1312]

Gr8 monologue. And you are right that anyone of Indian lineage living anywhere in the world can be or is a Political Hindu if he/she practices the 3 criteria you listed: Mutual Respect, Reciprocity and Ahinsa (Krishn Version), if that's what you meant. And over time this can be or is already applicable to any Global citizen. Anyone anywhere in the world who believes in and practices these 3 things is a Political Hindu. Great Concept. Very well explained 👍🏻👍🏻.

[@nitinnimkar1654]

RSS is good NGO. We want bad RSS that is accused by opposition. FYI I am the RSS swayansevak for 50 years.

[@hrp0219]

Sir, any specific reason why the RSS has toned down over the years?

[@nitinnimkar1654]

@@hrp0219 Nobody has said it explicitly. But the reason I think, is the violent separatist tendencies & if they are needled more they will start Pak 2 demands.

[@shashankkuram4239]

My neighbor is Nashville is Michael Chandler! I sometimes train with him when he is in town since I train at Nashville MMA which he also co owns

[@SamSam-il6ec]

You do the best monologues.

[@rohitpathak2522]

Great content

[@logicrationalcommonsense1335]

bang on !!! it was a nice podcast ! this swayamsevak liked it ! watched your podcast for first time !

[@sumitsharma692]

Good stuff!!

[@harshsanatani1699]

Nice topic!

[@Alduizard]

1:25:42 Wow this is good news, wasn't aware of this! Definitely looking fwd to it. Btw, a decent monologue this one.

[@adityatiwari1022]

proud member :)

[@ghanshyam1990]

Caste is the million pound elephant in the road to maintaining Hindu unity. As members of depressed classes are becoming educated, aware and experienced they are forming their own leadership and conducting their own political experiments. Religious unity will have to be negotiated and cannot be assumed as default.

[@surajsingh7606]

Casteism is going down with the millennials and gen Z, the other big issue I have observed is the inferiority complex remnant from colonial times, which still persists and is holding us back.

[@ronitrajput3934]

@@surajsingh7606 not yet.

[@millennialmind9507]

Sanskritization will eventually bring a casteless society

[@ghanshyam1990]

@@surajsingh7606 - As per NCRB (2020) there were 50,000 cases registered under SC ST Atrocities Prevention Act.

[@ghanshyam1990]

@@millennialmind9507 - Why should anyone learn a language not spoken by even 0.1% of the population?

[@bhuvaneshs.k638]

This was a bloodly brilliant monologue Episode... I have an episode suggestion. Can I suggest it through paying UPI?

[@Noname-oq9mk]

You are absolutely right

[@theeternal6890]

*There are things I disagree with u for example on concept of De-coloniality and Ved suriority but I agree 100% with u on this issue what u said in this video.* Kudos to u for working for our survival as Hindu civilizastion.

[@himdude9637]

Very good information

[@25thsora10]

Such a W take

[@adithcheshan2748]

🙏🙏🙏

[@satyam4827]

Can we officially leave our caste and live just as a Hindu? Should we promote this idea to remove caste system?

[@priharahj5515]

we need socio economoc reservation and n e reservatn based on caste religion minority etv need to b off the system yes we can start the demand n hope eventually govt does the required changed

[@shashiaaravpatel8928]

I have better option than .... Gov should encourage people to leave their caste based surname or somehow they ban to use it.... If opposition opposes this then publicly they'll faces humiliation as they consider themselves as pioneer for not doing caste based election and the same time unnecessary pride between the community also resolved the cessation of hierarchy of the caste based system and everyone ll be in the same rank..

[@theeternal6890]

*As u said about we need to end or atleast dilute caste system and also I have many hindus say similar things including myself but I have never heard anyone really talking about solution to it. What according to u is the solution to this other than obvious things that we do for example intercaste marriages and all?*

[@harshwardhan4331]

Sir ji can you bring someone on ur podcast who can give us an insight of what's going on in US politics and it's deep state lobbies. The way US foreign policy shifted it brought me doubts that is why I am emphasizing

[@smoky3302]

I forgot to ask can we consider neo Buddhism as political Buddhism similar to hindutva . they also want to destroy caste and aim to create a more secular and modern India . atleast in principle.

[@DailyLifeSolution]

Neo Buddhists(Ambedkarists) want to replace everything related to Hinduism with Ambedkar and his buddhism. Savarkarists do not want to hurt any Hindu panth.

[@jaymabharti982]

Lol .. Neo buddist don't wanna abolish caste becouse if caste destroyed then then many caste based political party will not exist .. they always need caste for their existence .. they sometimes say jai bhim with jai mim, if they claim they follow babasaheb then babasaheb don't like muslims so they once said SC are lower caste and obc other upper caste now they get to know OBC is a big chunk in here so they now added SC and obc and lower caste and others are upper caste .. they don't want to abolish caste they need caste to destroy sanatan dharma ..

[@shubhamdubey9561]

They are the ones responsible for hate towards hindu and they were always political in india since 1947

[@DailyLifeSolution]

@विष्णुकांत सिंधुसुत Ambedkarites are not a Hindu panth, they are a cult of personality. In the way of Ambrahamic faiths, Ambedkar was the prophet who enlightened the people of the "true" word of the Buddha. It is sad that many of Hindutvists do not understand this. Ambedkarites will never be a part of Hindutva.

[@vibhavdeshpande8196]

@@DailyLifeSolution There is a beautiful article by Dr. Koenrad Elst on this topic. I am not able to find it. In that he had made a point that we should not be concerned about neo-buddhism. That even though at its core it is kind of abrahamic, but by the means of it, many neo-buddhists have started to discover and appreciate the practices and concepts from traditional Buddhism. Baring the activist types, many educated neo-buddhists are pretty dharmic.

[@Noname-oq9mk]

Right

[@amanshukla6225]

बस भारत देश का भला हो भविष्य में यही हम चाहते है।

[@Noname-oq9mk]

👍

[@guptabhishek]

please share the source for the intro music

[@mansis4117]

What is that music in the beginning of the podcast

[@kiraan2610]

Maratha Empire was officially called Hindu Pad Padshahi the idea first proposed by Bajirao 1 Peshwa. It is also the name of the book by Savarkar which is easily more than 300 year old ideology/movement. And Chhatrapati Shivaji's dream was Hindavi Swaraj, easily 350+ years old movement/ideology. Then there is Vijayanagara Empire which had similar idea but didn't call themselves Hindu, easily 675+ years old idea/movement.

[@LostMonk679]

43:00 51:14 54:49 58:08

[@nbii2337]

What about Christian missionaries they are silently converting people in southern and North eastern part of Bharat

[@smoky3302]

bhai they are doing it in North .Central and Western India too.

[@nbii2337]

@@smoky3302 thanks for info🙏

[@aditya-rt4zb]

@@nbii2337 he said it categorically in the podcast

[@bababistril]

@@nbii2337 see 30:00 to 40:00

[@bharatpakkha7787]

How long should Hindus keep self bound to only one umbrella (and form alternative) despite they don't get what they need on time (or at all)? Why should not there be a challenging group of Hindus, so that the ruling group always be in pressure? Anyone misuses power and tortures Hindus (innocent), should be checked by the alternative. Hindu on power is challenged by Hindus in opposition. Always alternative is available. Goodness is a matter of society that makes these groups.

[@pikachuXman]

Islam is a state/ country without borders. They are a complete package. With how to think, how to eat, spirituality and constitution. So, pro Islamist can never be Indian.

[@praveshsingh4254]

Nice dream

[@pramod_p5]

The Rahul Nagor ha bhai, the podcast you commented on has less than 6k views even after a week, his monologue got 10k views within a day, aur bolo, nobody like Kushal's monologue.

[@deeess9492]

Surprised at what Kushal said about AAP being anti-Hindu & anti-India - however, in his interview with Suhel Seth just a few days ago, he didn't counter Seth when he said "AAP is delivering in Delhi" Delivering what? Riots & illegal Rohingyas & Bangladeshis?!? Should've asked Suhel Seth to explain his statement

[@akshattewari]

He's trying to be a blooding prophet...!!! 😂😂

[@nerf2752]

RW civil war kub hai ? AIM vs Sai Deepak

[@thearton3846]

I'm a political hindu.

[@bhaveshdk]

I'm

[@superduper9732]

i also hate the caste system

[@AVPA297]

Make uplifting intro.

[@sharadchandakacherla8268]

The way u say tilak ,same in kannada for bengaluru 🙂

[@chetanmazire5373]

Same way in marathi too

[@tanmaysalunkhe4483]

बेंगळूरू?

[@himdude9637]

I am a political Hindu

[@Noname-oq9mk]

Hello

[@pratikmishra1898]

Just to clarify, by ISLAMISM he doesn't mean ISLAM. He is talking about the radicals.

[@bhaveshbhardwaj6724]

????

[@akshattewari]

Bro, sometimes you seem to be living in an ivory tower...!!

[@Noname-oq9mk]

Hi

[@mohammed7888]

The views are mostly similar to Abrahamik religions. I think we are only country with a huge diversity. And your views are similar to any of the Abrahamik religions. Your claims can be achieved when there is a rule of law it's not necessary to kill the diversity of subcontinent.

[@gj8003]

Test

[@madhavgoel229]

Please watch Gopi shankar madurai interview on vaad channel and of ankit bhuptani of queer hindu alliance on citti media channel ; listen to their on Sexuality in santana dharma. Political hindu = Hindutva Will always be a proud Indian & a Political sanatani hindu till death .

[@bababistril]

fun fact : this channel has already done a podcast with gopi (you can find it in his playlist named shastraarth ,video no.10)

[@bababistril]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/nJTSmKlpm7-qjdk he already did a podcast with gopi Madurai and some other people on the same topic

[@madhavgoel229]

@@bababistril thnx

[@smoky3302]

NOTA se kucch na HOTA.

[@Olive_Chap]

👍🏿🧔🏿🌚🧒🏿

[@sarlapalkar1054]

I don't mind being called a Hindu fundamentalist. Being called a secularist is an insult to me .

[@badangle9085]

Casteless societies got islamised or Christened

[@arys4925]

.

[@straightrazor1236]

Kushal seems drunk today. 😜

[@smoky3302]

sadly he didn't drink or smoke .

[@nk5602]

New intro is terrible

[@pinkpixel8474]

Yeah the previous one was aesthetic but the new one is not that bad it just need some improvements

[@aayushpaliwal3450]

Ye le comment.

[@praveenchandrakosaraju5931]

The caste system was started by the Britishers. What if we get ride of caste system.

[@IncredibleNeo]

It was practiced with quiet seriousness before the british came.. The British just gave it the name of "Caste System". We called it jaati/varna vyastha but the system predates even the time when islam came to india.

[@darshu94]

Lower caste dont want that. Cz they gain so much from their caste identity

[@mos5139]

Savarkars definition of a Hindu is better

[@Indianpsychonaut]

I agree with you on most points but not gonna vote for Bjp/Rss. on theory they are anti casteism & pro individuality but in practical they aren't . They are basically right wing version of communism. Will stick to Nota

[@GaneshPatil-ip4kl]

BJP'S political hindus r against castism is such a cute lie 😂 Safed muhh le k chote bacche nhi bolte 'maine toohhh niii thaya chawlk ' uss type ka zuth 😀

[@Indianpsychonaut]

Can't agree more. I agree with kushal for most parts except voting I will always vote for nota

[@playerjack2566]

@@Indianpsychonaut well it his choice he isn't forcing anyone he only support them because of ideology but of course someone opposite will be there in party

[@geetaarth7142]

Hindu kya political Hindu banange, jo apane bachhon ko hindi ko 3rd language ki tarah bhi padane ko raji nahin hain. Muslim kam se kam Hindustani ko apanaye hue to hain. Pakistan, jisane Indian culture aur civilization se apana nata tod liya, ne bhi ek Indian origin language, Urdu ko apani quami juban banaya hai.

[@venkatt6281]

call yourself savarkar podcast, why call upon carvaka

[@bababistril]

see his other videos to understand

[@bababistril]

it's not his fault that sarvakar wanted to mordernise and reform Hinduism , and thus he finds similarity with some of sarvakars ideas irrespective of what the left in india potray of sarvakar we can't deny he wanted to reform and mordenise Hinduism and try and solve the caste problem but with more clarity

[@venkatt6281]

@@bababistril carvakas were materialists. Hinduism is predicated on caste. In fact from how entrenched caste is to hinduism it seems to be the religion itself was an attempt to assimilate all castes into a identity without letting the heirarchy go away. So to call yourself a political hindu, give your own definition of it such that you don't have to deal with the materaility of being a hindu and using carvakas name for it seems disingenious. Anyway I have little patience with political hindus or political islam Or any of it.. All it leaves is a bunch of dead bodies in the name of saving the world/nation etc

[@bababistril]

​​​​@@venkatt6281 Hinduism has 9 schools of thoughts , and carvak is one of them ... carvaks while being materialistic were also against the belief of any god or divinity of any book, heaven or hell or rebirth .. carvaks were also against ritualistic things , i.e carvaks not believing even in caste irrespective of which book/who said it , not to mention carvaks are also part of Rig Veda ,there is a whole section in it questioning god and any such existence AND VEDAS BEING A PART OF HINDUISM so carvaks are still part of hindusim , even RSS openly talks about Rishi Carvak , Marxists in india tried to hijack the carvak philosophy and even went as far as to say all carvaks were Marxists , but failed miserably even if you believe in god, there are many instances of movements against caste within Hinduism itself , like the Bhakti movement 1000 yrs back , they openly called themselves Hindus and prayed to hindu gods while being against caste system so stop projecting your personal missinformation and agenda on to what hindutva/hindusim is and should be , Hinduism has always been a reformist civilization and will continue to be , as we've seen with bhakti movement 1,300 years back ..then with Arya samaj and then with Sarvaker who was also against caste so to say caste is integral part of hindusim is straight up dishonesty on your part . being an atheist/carvak my self ,I think there is nothing wrong in people wanting to reform and modernising whilst satying with their religious belifs , it's an easier way than to force evry one to not follow religion atheist shouldn't mean Anti-Theist , like what Dawkins and Sam Harris do .. atleast my hindu friends and family don't mind me being an atheist unlike my muslim peers who not only think I'm a a loony fornnot believing in god they also try to convince me into Islam often.. again abhramic religions have problems against atheists(in Bible and quran they are instructed to kill non believers) so atheists in those abhramic countries are anti-theists and hate religion to the core , for them it's either you are a Christian/muslim or not part of the religious system (binary way if thinking) but in hinduism there isn't anything against atheism, it's even a part of it(rig Veda carvaks) , I as an atheist don't have anything against hindusim I can be an atheist and a hindu and pursue my individual philosophy and way of thinking.

[@bababistril]

​​@@venkatt6281 the core idea if political Hinduism is to not be violent 🙄 and political ideologes are what the problem is , for example communism is not a religion yet the no. of killings they've done in india alone in the name of saving the ideology is astounding, even killing opposition party members 🤷‍♂️ leaving russia and china for now 🤷‍♂️ your lack of patients may lead to ignorance many times, even from the anthropological pov ,it makes sense to reform people within the religion insted of going radical and forcing people to change and give up religion , cause religion with all of its flaws still gives a sense of purpose and happiness to people and we can't deny that , so you have to think about these reformist movements from several aspects not simply to trump your atheistic ideology over others , then what will be the difference between you and missionaries trying to convert you into their religion?

[@praveenchandrakosaraju5931]

A liberal Hindu is secular so cannot be a political Hindu in my opinion.

[@RohanBasu_00]

Most hindus are born liberal bro but the liberal meaning is skewed due to our hypocrite liberals

[@aditya-rt4zb]

Abbey person can't be secular, state is secular..people have biases and leanings

[@viswanathanseshadri1047]

in India only a Hindu is liberal. a liberal is the worst of the illebarals.

[@pramod_p5]

being a secularist is good (secularist: supporting the state to be secular). Just because progressive authoritarians (so-called left-liberals in India) have concocted a weird form of secularism (Nehruvian secularism as they say) which is anything but secular the proper definition of secularism is contrary. If one supports secularism and doesn't support UCC, then they have either not understood secularism or are using the concept of secularism for political gains, both of which define current-day progressive authoritarians of India (left-liberals of India).

[@shivrajtalekar9254]

Shikari spam

[@cinephilex7072]

he said i want annihilation of caste system then fearing other bhagva casteists collegues he started "u can disagree with me .....".lol. kitni fat rahi hain apne hi logo se lmof

[@aditya-rt4zb]

Waha pe usne yeh bhi bola. The trads (who believe in caste) can't do a shit about him.

[@anjalisadhwan3502]

KM is an amazing guy. I would go to the extent of saying "KM is a person whose mind is worth studying as it is one of a kind". 1. The person is a hardcore individualist, but now wants to form some sort of a practical club/group to maintain their hegemonic position of individualism. (I say : let him achieve this 'perfect' state, and soon he will find out that the outcome will be just another form of tribalism/groupism which he so vociferously hates. Actually globalism is just the same with Christian inputs largely, and i think the outcome will remain similar even if the input is hindu), 2. The person is an anti-idealogue, but if you listen to his views, you will be convinced that he is an even stronger idealogue. (Who offers no solution at all except for saying: X system has Y problems. This is typical of idealogues). 3. The person wants to annihlate Jati Varna system, but at the same time wants to create 'a political hindu' jati, and thereby create / recognise other jatis like 'islamists', 'casteists', 'colonialists', 'globalists', etc 4. The person says: "let the trads exists, just make sure that they are not in positions of power", yet at the same time is pro-democracy and individual rights. (This statement is the most problematic imo and it is strictly against decentralized systems which have ensured that sanatana dharma still survives inspite of numerous attacks) 5. His definition of a Hindu is the most idealoguesque. It is the most impractical as well.

[@pramod_p5]

1) he wants a governing system that treats people as individuals. He recognizes people as individuals too, but there are some common traits based on groups that can be considered. The point is while arguing with someone about a concept, he (AFAIK) debates with the individual rather than their group identity (opposing strawman arguments in the process). 2) He is willing to change his views if he gets a better ideology, philosophy, principle, scientific evidence, etc, that's quite the opposite of an ideologue, who would believe his or her bias, no matter what. 3) Jati is based on birth (the word itself being derived from janana), which would mean no change in your beliefs, work, or lifestyle no matter your belief. How does he create another jati or caste, when as per his argument people should be free to choose if they want to be Islamists, casteists, colonialists or globalists. It's not like your parents and family are globalists, so you are denied to be a colonialist or something, you can be anything you want as long as it doesn't result in violence. 4) "Make sure they are not in positions of power" that is made through democratic elections, not by forcing them out of power or something through violent means. 5) Idk, I didn't feel it like that in any way, he sounds like a reasonable man, with strong arguments, some of which I don't like, but would likely debate with him rather than make an analysis that didn't make any sense but was filled with jargon of ignorance.

[@dharmapilled6092]

Basically he has already said that " if you are from generation who believes in my way mah rules, MLA/MP makes policy, whole world is a fairyland where everyone kisses each other and say good morning , good night " then this podcast is not for you. I have been following him for 3 years, he is believer of all the things you have mentioned but at the same time has given importance to "demographics/ voting pattern/ political hindu as prime identity". Whose rules you want to follow, certainly not mah life mah rules, or trads rule ya political hindus rules. I am certainly willing to subscribe towards political hindus rule.

[@anjalisadhwan3502]

@@pramod_p5 Point 4. -> Yeah, right. "With you, without you, inspite you" Is truly democratic.

[@anjalisadhwan3502]

@@pramod_p5 Point 2 -> Everyone says that.

[@anjalisadhwan3502]

@@pramod_p5 Point 5-> Yeah, please 'debate' with him and wait for slurs immediately. Anyways, I don't 'not like' him. I infact think that he is a good reflection of the charvaka position. Obviously, the immediate result of the same is 'no grounding' in any local indic tradition. Hence, things will always be Top-to-bottom rather than bottom-up in his worldviews. Moreover, I don't have much practical problem with his viewpoints as I stated in point 1. You go down this road and soon you will end up at block1 again. Meanwhile, the indic decoloniality school will be enough explored by then to provide a good way forward.

[@akhilkapoor413]

Indian society will be much much better of of without the rss

[@vivekpmc1992]

Bakwas!! Woke !!! Confused man !!

[@pramod_p5]

ha?