Why We Have Data Protection

BP Visits tries to audit a glass manufacturer in West Yorkshire, and in a friendly encounter with a staff member, he unintentionally provides us with a perfect illustration of why we have data protection, the risks and dangers that arise when it is ignored, and why auditors need to get up to speed on it if they wish to continue their activities.
Footage is copyright of BP Visits, Ardagh Group and Lincoln International Business School, used here under fair dealing.
BP Visits’ footage (“What You Doing With That Camera??”):
• What You Doing With Th...
BP Visits KZbin Channel:
/ @bpvisits
Previous videos of mine about BP Visits:
-“Show Your Badge For BP Visits”:
• Show Your Badge For BP...
-“What Would You Do?”:
• What Would You Do? #sh...
January 2019 Graduation - Interview with Julie Watson, Plant Director Ardagh Glass Knottingley:
• January 2019 Graduatio...
Meet our AMP - Europe Team:
• Meet our AMP - Europe ...
Locations page on the Ardagh Group website:
www.ardaghgroup.com/corporate...
Bedale Drive on Google Street View:
www.google.com/maps/@53.70500...
Wakefield Council’s Definitive Map for the Knottingley area:
map.wakefield.gov.uk/connect/...
Section 1 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...
Section 142 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984:
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/...
Channel Theme:
Credit to Ashutosh/@ashutoshmusic
www.ashutoshmusic.com/music

[@looneytune6955]

The only time i ever watch these clowns is through your videos as i don't have the time to waste on these individuals. So this character is called 'BP audits.' So lets go through the aud'tit' checklist/script. Firstly and very importantly he/she are masked up. ✔ Industrial unit/s ✔ The all important 'i'm gonna get the drone out' ✔ The virtually non existent knowledge of the company they 'auditing' ✔ Walking past clearly signposted barriers to entry ✔ The interaction with said member of staff for the gauging of a reaction ✔ Section 33 ❌ (although it maybe elsewhere on his footage but i have zero interest to go looking) Now, the most important point mentioned here is the second to last, the gauging of a reaction. It's the whole reason they are there. Nothing to do with personal interest in this case in glass companies or being there for educational purposes or the ludicrous suggestion from the chinny ninja that they are there to promote said businesses. The visit is intended for no other reason to intimidate members of staff for a reaction video for cheap views on social media platforms for revenue raising purposes. Why else would you go to company premises fully masked up? Because, being brutally honest, if you were there for genuine reasons you would firstly notify the company of your intentions whether that being business or personal. Its personal etiquette, something these auditors know nothing about. The only thing these videos do is appeal to algorithm on you tube, it takes no account of the personal details or personal feelings of the people targeted on these visits. They also serve no purpose other than to give other like minded fools a feeling that they somehow have a power over someone else.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

Great comment, pinned.

[@zapbrannigan000]

this is another auditor who has purchased a DJ Audits franchise. its amazing that he uses the same script almost word for word.

[@colinpenfold9890]

It’s actually quite frightening when you think about the effects someone like BP visits can have on someone’s life. That lady seemed like a very nice and friendly person and question I have is where was security during all this.

[@Sopdarity]

Throughly enjoyed your video clip.. Beautifully crafted assessment of this disgusting type of harassment.. These people are low life.. Thanks for the education.. New subscriber...

[@three-phase562]

Not sure if you read the comments in BP's video, but in them he said he had already checked the land ownership before going and knew it was private, which he said is why he left without argument. Although he usually goes down the 'it is publicly accessible as the gate is open' line. Not sure why he didn't on this occasion. May be she didn't realise the body mounted GoPro was on and audio and video recording, carrying the recorder in his hand probably puts the main focus on it, rather than the GoPro.

[@babettesfeast6347]

Why film companies for no other reason to annoy the security. None of these auditors film in rough council estates, outside boxing gyms.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

They prefer soft targets.

[@stevietrucker4631]

Because they haven't got the balls to do so.

[@dazndi6209]

​@@Gkofilmslol, hard men really, gice me stregth, i do hpe you were being ironic

[@bevsartsandcrafts715]

I watched an audit video once where the auditor was really quite bullying to a female security guard. I told him in the comments that that was out of order and that they went too far. You could see, so obviously too, that she was upset 😢

[@streetvideoreviewer]

They just don't care and would actually see this as a sort of victory. They're sick.

[@okeyDokey.]

You need to stop referring to them as auditors, they aren't auditors and don't even understand what an audit is. They are just jobless nobodies who have failed in life.

[@scotchegg9797]

Did you know that Ryan rampage once said that they're called auditors because they use their audio to report on places, I kid you not. He genuinely thought the words 'auditor' and 'audio' were linked and someone using their audio as he put it, was auditing.

[@okeyDokey.]

@@scotchegg9797 haha because he's clueless and a bit simple 😂

[@matthew-gn4qd]

another very informative video. the KZbinr in this video appears fairly reasonable and polite except of course the huge lie about broadcasting the footage on his channel. encouraging people to leave malicious reviews is yet another abuse that victims are put through. its about time the police started investigating these individuals and taking them off the streets. they're obviously causing alot of harm and distress. victims should also be compensated for the abuse they've received.

[@Rachel_M_]

Good Morning to all the early birds waiting for the sun to come up. Much love ♥

[@ChrisJones-pu8gh]

I really think that the word / name "doofus" should be employed more. These people are the epitome of a "doofus". They "do" break the law and then they "fuss" when asked to explain themselves. DJ "doofuss", Auditing "doofuss", Marti *doofuss". I would really like to see what happens, when they mess with the wrong people who also have cameras...... "So here is my video of a doofuss having a kicking" or "here is my video of me drowning a doofuss". It's only a matter of time. To my way of thinking, I would never be an auditor. It could be more dangerous than being a combat soldier as you have no way of defending yourself against an actual attack. DJ makes me laugh when he says "don't come any closer, I will defend myself". I mean, how would such a wimp actually defend himself? He thinks the camera will defend him. It won't when it is stuffed down his throat and his body is thrown in a canal. Long live the British canal network.

[@davidupton3175]

As you may know I'm a new subscriber to your platform and just beginning to get wise about these "auditors" , thanks to your knowledge of regulations . I was wondering, can these victims of deceit claim against the "auditors"(moneywise) if they happen to come across the video online, maybe a month or two after it was published.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

Yes, they can bring civil claims in common law for breach of privacy (misuse of private information) and breach of data protection under Article 82 of the UK GDPR or section 169 of the Data Protection Act 2018. I think 'class actions' are the way forward - a way needs to be found to bring the victims under one umbrella to bring claims. It will be necessary to prove financial and/or emotional or psychological damage has been suffered.

[@davidupton3175]

@@streetvideoreviewer thank you for your reply. Will look forward to the time this happens. Just watched the marti blag video where DJ audits found his details posted on IPB property, tickled me, and I agree with you that Marti did it.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

@@areed1701 You are talking twaddle. A representative mass action has that test, but other mass actions don't. You are clearly bluffing and don't know what you're talking about.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

@@areed1701 Nowhere have I proposed that claimants in a mass action should not be "of the same claim and against the same group or organisation". You are clearly on a wind-up and you have now outstayed your welcome and are banned!

[@boxerotheweek6789]

The worst snitcher is the laughing auditor and it's so funny because he always talks so tough. Anyway I have a question, a common line used is 'if I can see it I can record it, it's just evidence of what I see'

[@streetvideoreviewer]

In English law, unless an individual is under court order, there is generally no prior restraint on simply photographing things you can see, however if one undertakes photography in such a way that is disrespectful and inconsiderate of others, there is a risk of legal consequences as a result. The point to make, then, is that the issue is not so much photography itself, rather it is the behaviour of the photographer.

[@Rachel_M_]

​@@streetvideoreviewerindeed. I may be able to see through the fence at a military establishment, but if I get my zoom lens out I'm probably going to be spoken to.... In a small room..... Somewhere...... And I won't have a right to silence due to Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act. It's all about context and the totality of circumstances.

[@brianserious]

​@@streetvideoreviewerlegal consequences as in civil? For example the papperazi, they behave terrible,

[@brianserious]

​@@Rachel_M_However, they may only stop and question a person for the purpose of allowing a determination of whether that person appears to be someone who is or who has been concerned in the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism. / highly trained specialist officers will determine in 2 seconds that what they are dealing with is 2 bit frauditors, they won't abuse schedule 7, much as we want them to

[@Rachel_M_]

@@brianserious as I said it depends on context. Take your drone over a military site and see what happens. Use a disposable 35 mm camera with a fixed lens, different story. In my example above I state telephoto lens. Try it. See how it works out for you. I also say it's context dependent We could sit here all day discussing the infinite contextual variations, or perhaps people could start taking a risk analysis approach to their photography. Look up how many photographers die each from falls or being trampled by livestock. It's more than you think.

[@midnightwithoutyou61]

I think DJ AUDITS latest video " You Think It's OK Just To Film Anywhere Without Permission" is staged. You've got him on the run

[@streetvideoreviewer]

I haven't seen the video yet, but you've got me interested. When you say 'staged', what exactly do you mean? I do suspect that two or three of his videos show businesses that are owned/controlled by fans who have agreed for him to turn up so that he can record a 'friendly' visit for his own PR purposes, to put auditing in a better light.

[@midnightwithoutyou61]

@@streetvideoreviewer He got on so well with the staff without trying to cause a confrontation. Gave me the feeling that it was staged to show him in a better light. He's just posted another friendly video " I'm The Owner And My Staff Came To Tell Me" he's definitely got a different approach to his audits.

[@user-yz6lb5pt8h]

Maybe they've just heard of him and took the opportunity to promote their stuff.

[@mikedavies4387]

As anyone watched that latest vlog of mb said he was going spray some guy guy seem to got him in a corner and mb got bit scarred

[@Image_7_Media]

I watched it and was surprised that you are allowed to carry a deterrent spray. I presume that you must be allowed or MB would not have been so open about it :)

[@mikedavies4387]

@@Image_7_Media I'm surprised that you can carry something like that

[@Image_7_Media]

According to Google it looks like Marti May have been in the wrong. Is it legal to carry self-defence spray UK? A self defence spray, such as pepper spray, is another item which is illegal to carry, despite it being considered a common self defence item. While petitions have been previously lodged for pepper spray to be made legal, the government has currently no plans to legalise them.20 Jan 2023

[@mikedavies4387]

@Image_7_Media I had a feeling that you couldn't carry something like that I know pepper spray you can't but wasn't 100% about what spray he had

[@mdmoore100]

@@Image_7_MediaI think it’s because pepper spray is an irritant and that gel is designed as a marker hence not in the same class as pepper or CS spray.

[@kenbradley5032]

we all know these fake auditors dress in a way that will cause company workers to challenge them and their excuse is they dont want to be identified on their own videos. so i assume they are not proud of their videos. Their whole reason to be there is to engage with anyone who approaches them and then keep the video going with inane conversation. In this video he was reasonably polite but i suspect that was because it was a lady. They have very little or no interest in any company they visit and as you say more info is available on their web page.

[@user-yw9cu6oo3i]

Hi Mate, just an idea but can you review Drone Audits Scotland (DAS) i like you think Auditors have got a lot to answer for with all their nasty tactics but DAS is different as he's polite and tells businesses what he's doing before flying drone over, i also know he's a fan of your channel as mentioned it a comment a while back reason for me commenting in an older video as don't want him to see me referring him to you , i feel your truthful and yes the guy may get criticised by you but also think you will praise him where he does good , in his newest video he goes to a car auction and the security speak really fast in which most auditors would pick up on but DAS refers to him as a good guy and just brushes off that "all scots speak quick" instead of making a fool of him online, i know he also welcomes criticism as he always admits he's still learning, think his video would make a great review but please keep my name out of it if do, KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK SVR love how you pick up on some of these IDIOTS bullying with a camera

[@streetvideoreviewer]

Thanks - will take a look.

[@user-yw9cu6oo3i]

Thanks mate, look forward to returning its great see all the things auditors do wrong that us the viewer don't notice@@streetvideoreviewer

[@DaveS-hz3rk]

It’s the escalation in behaviour to get the reaction which is incredible. TLA wiping out the marker “gel” in his latest masterpiece. Would love to know your thoughts on that one if you can stomach his nonsense long enough!

[@streetvideoreviewer]

I haven't been watching his videos lately. Has he been using Farb-Gel? Is that what you're referring to?

[@DaveS-hz3rk]

@@streetvideoreviewer yea that’s the item.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

@@DaveS-hz3rk I will take a look. He's taking a legal risk threatening anybody with that, let alone using it. I think this is an area of another potentially disastrous misunderstanding on the part of auditors. It is legal to sell and possess Farb-Gel in the UK, which I think has lulled them into the belief they can just whip it out on the slightest pretext. Any use of it will be subject to the usual legal tests on the use of force. I am genuinely surprised Auditing Yorkshire was not prosecuted for threatening somebody with it at Liverpool Airport.

[@DarkThickett99]

can you see which way a tiny drone is pointing max altitude 120 metres up in the dark ? dj audit latest video. ive never flown one but i doubt it

[@DarkThickett99]

looks like he has pulled the video

[@atlanticx100]

It would be interesting to see some videos by "proper" film / KZbinrs rather than the confrontational visits but to have real background / researched videos that are done by many other channels on this platform. Those creators do many hours of research not just "web searches". I know it would not have the same excitement. But it would be a lot more educational about what happens in the factories. Rather than "Oh show us your SIS badge" etc etc.

[@streetvideoreviewer]

I agree. I also think well-researched videos could also be made just as, if not more, watchable than auditing videos. Most of these auditing videos, when you strip it down, are quite dull and boring anyway. I think one reason people still watch them is 'the next thing' hasn't trended yet, because nobody has moved up a gear and it becomes a habit to fill in dead time after work or while working, etc., in the absence of something else to have on. A lot of the time, it's just an auditor walking round some mundane place that he hasn't bothered to research, just looking for somebody to harass, which must start to get stale after a while.

[@alanjones7545]

DJ audits filmed a young copper, and degraded him on camera over his presentation and his manners. Truly humiliated him, it's out there for the world to watch, I often wonder how he is now

[@streetvideoreviewer]

Can you tell me which one that is, please? Or e-mail me with the title or link? Thanks.

[@alanjones7545]

DJs video of defra seem to win him a lot of support, because the security said he couldn't and police said they could. Watching the marti version below at 18mins there victorious and decide, unprovoked, to set about verbally abusing the security as he comes back into work 18mins in. They're sick 🤢 kzbin.info/www/bejne/gGSagp6hmtN7mZosi=0sUQUNIdSK4YE_xk

[@alanjones7545]

@@streetvideoreviewer kzbin.info/www/bejne/bIOVf2aYaK5paZosi=o4RxEV6FKYicmP6K

[@stumpy8513]

What would you do if it was a woman covering her face with a hijab... Would you call the police 😂 As for implied right of access for private roads that lead to multiple businesses, this cannot be removed by a single business that isn't the sole owner of the road I'm afraid my friend. Implied right of access isn't trespass and it's implied by the open gates and lack of signage stipulating otherwise 🙄

[@streetvideoreviewer]

The private road in this video serves one business only. There is no such thing as "implied right of access" in the context of public access to private land. What I think you are referring to is implied permission, a concept I discuss regularly in my videos whenever the topic of trespass arises. Hijabs are an entirely different matter as they are for religious purposes rather than to conceal one's identity and provoke trouble.