1. how do you know it got the right answer? How can you check it if no other computer can do the calculation? 2. The explanation was total nonsense and did not come even close to explaining how quantum computing works. 3. Only specific types of problems can be solved using quantum calculations... and these need a special form of math and programming language to do so... so the practicality of quantum computing is still questionable. 4. how did they solve the greatest problem with quantum computing? i.e. physical random errors at the lowest atomic level in the circuits. 4. quantum computing has nothing to do with "multiple universes", that is total BS.
@ohiunku3 күн бұрын
1. “How do you know it got the right answer?” This is a legitimate question for quantum supremacy claims. Typically, researchers validate quantum computations by comparing the output to a simplified version of the problem that classical computers can simulate for smaller cases. For problems too large for classical verification, statistical sampling or theoretical models are used. The challenge lies in establishing trust in results when no classical benchmark exists. 2. “The explanation was nonsense and didn’t explain how quantum computing works.” • Explaining quantum computing succinctly is challenging. Quantum computers leverage qubits, which exist in superpositions of states (both 0 and 1 simultaneously) and are entangled, meaning the state of one qubit is linked to others. Operations exploit these properties to perform parallel computations. If the explanation lacked clarity, it might be because it’s difficult to convey this complexity in lay terms. 3. “Only specific types of problems can be solved using quantum calculations.” • Correct. Quantum computers excel at particular tasks like factoring large numbers, optimisation, and simulating quantum systems, but they are not universally faster than classical computers. For general-purpose computing, classical computers remain dominant. 4. “The practicality of quantum computing is questionable.” • Practicality is still an ongoing debate. Current quantum computers face issues with scalability, error correction, and coherence (maintaining qubit states long enough to compute). Google’s Willow chip represents progress, but we are far from fault-tolerant, large-scale quantum computing. 5. “How did they solve physical random errors?” • Error correction is a major hurdle in quantum computing. Techniques like surface codes and error-correcting algorithms can identify and mitigate errors, but these approaches often require many physical qubits to create one logical qubit. Progress has been made, but error correction remains a limiting factor. 6. “Quantum computing has nothing to do with ‘multiple universes’.” • The reference to “multiple universes” is likely based on the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, which some use as an analogy to explain superposition. While this interpretation is intriguing, it’s not a requirement for quantum computing to work. The computation relies on the mathematics of quantum mechanics, not specific interpretations.
@tomslitovnieks80363 күн бұрын
Do you experts know how encryption works? Md5, sha256...? Heard of those? Because it seems you havent let me answer all your questions - encryption takes forever to crack and 1sec to make. If they have an answer, then it takes a normal computer also 1 sec to check if it is correct, it doesnt take trillion years like it would if they wanted to crack it
@brianquigley19403 күн бұрын
@@tomslitovnieks8036You do not address anything I wrote...
@mmkr1-gl5bg4 күн бұрын
Seems like only science folks and experts from Google understand what is going on here. Still can't get how the performance increase is (technically) achieved. A programmer here.
@catoftruth10443 күн бұрын
Even the scientists who build AI can't tell you how Ai works
@mmkr1-gl5bg2 күн бұрын
@@catoftruth1044 If you mean the generative AI, it's well clear how it works: by stealing other people's works. 😀
@LenaRoss-i9e2 күн бұрын
@@mmkr1-gl5bg😂😂 your a funny one 😆
@MozartificeR3 күн бұрын
When are they going to come out with dynamic Qbiit lengths?
@jaffetcordoba44145 күн бұрын
So far, one of the best explanations I have seen and heard. I am still not sure I understand how the superposition states are read. Are they converted to standard binary in any case? Great job, as always on the hunt for homework well done.
@luminousfractal4204 күн бұрын
they collapse to a defined state once measured. so 1's and 0's for us.
@JJs_playground4 күн бұрын
The qubits stay in a superposition until it is measured at that point the superposition (called Wave-particle duality) collapses and you have 1 state (either a 1 or a 0).
@bradokamura4 күн бұрын
They say women always overcomplicate things, but this woman has simplified quantum computing splendidly. lol
@Kassiusday2 күн бұрын
This lady journalist explains this quantum superposition of possibilities concept very well 👌🏽 !!
@channelingextraterrestrial36233 күн бұрын
It is time for humanity to start and cooperate and become star traveling and a galactic society. And live in peace with each other and with love.
@larryace46834 күн бұрын
Nothing but sensationalism. We won't see any real life usefulness of this "breakthrough"
@WaliaIbex4 күн бұрын
Theory. Why don't you show us the computer solving real problems .😂😂😂
@bluesy6664 күн бұрын
it's solving real problems you just can't understand it , and you need more than 5 minutes to get your head around it.
@WaliaIbex4 күн бұрын
@bluesy666 Real problem like chasing a UFO?
@catoftruth10443 күн бұрын
how can they check if the answer is correct if it takes septillion years to compute? how can they double check that it isnt hallucinating
@Grilledcheesyness4 күн бұрын
Seriously, best explanation I've listened to. She totally understands the subject and wants to communicate it effectively -- she's not just a newsreader here. Great work!
@brianquigley19404 күн бұрын
Sorry, but the explanation is not even close to how quantum computing works. And it's not clear at all. It just waves around terminology as an explanation without explaining why quantum computing will not be used for practical purposes for decades, e.g. the random errors that occur at the subatomic level when particles are entangled.
@bradokamura4 күн бұрын
I think they should get married, the girls I mean.
@tomnguyen1045Күн бұрын
how do they know that chip is right in their answer? i mean if it takes billions of years to calculate by the normal computer. Think about it
@asaejapan71434 күн бұрын
Even as a non-native speaker the expression "unfathomable speed" sounds awkward. Don't we want to not just use any superlative anywhere but keep the meaning of their root (fathom?) as we use them?
@TheChirix9994 күн бұрын
Well this going to impact Crypto a LOT ....
@phazephusion4 күн бұрын
Interesting how quantum computing catches all the shine whereas photonic computing is already being used in real world applications across the world. Fault-tolerant quantum computers are still a long ways off and the NISQ systems we have today are only useful for very, very specific applications. Also with the world trying to be more energy efficient in just about everything: Photonic systems are more energy efficient than our current electronic systems while quantum computers need their own powerplants to run.
@physicsouruniverse27984 күн бұрын
we moving towards the new era
@juancarlospizarromendez39542 күн бұрын
1 qubit is enough for all, 2 qubit and higher are redundant.
@catoftruth10443 күн бұрын
so it get any info with just a click of a button or just 1 clue, it can guess your passwords right and take your digital secrets? i think this device wont be available for the masses then.
@r.15994 күн бұрын
Just a thought that came to me: Tracking/monitoring cookies will become obsolete. Who needs them when Big Brother and corporations can have their own quantum computers with particles entangled with the particles in yours? They can literally watch exactly what you're doing in real time.
@phazephusion4 күн бұрын
Luckily that's not how entangled particles work. They're only entangle when not observed, once they are observed the entanglement is broken. Also there's currently no way to transfer information with entangled particles. So we are safe from an entangled quantum big brother for the foreseeable future
@r.15994 күн бұрын
@@phazephusion Hmmm, ever read J. Gregory Keyes' "Age of unreason" series? This video made me think of aetherscribers. If you have one particle in one computer, and another particle in the other, no-one's going to be observing them. Get enough of them and you can observe the effects of their motion. You can't do it now, but if someone's determined enough, a way will be found.
@masterchinese285 күн бұрын
Welcome to the Matrix.
@RoCoReacts3 күн бұрын
You have to understand that...
@east_coast_ceo10704 күн бұрын
Google is the future forward ❤ #Google
@rayrocher68874 күн бұрын
Thanks willow, made man , obsolete, matter. Matrix depressing, parallel worlds screwed us
@harriemeeuwis9784 күн бұрын
This 'expert' can wave her hands like a ventilator that doesn't mean she answered the question if Google cracked a key problem in quantum computing. Just telling things that you can easily find on the internet should not make you an expert. And I say that if Google would have cracked that big a problem their stock would have substantially risen. It has not so this is not that big a deal. And more. As a non expert I say that the number of qbits was far to small to be of any practical use.
@OtepArc3 күн бұрын
QUANTUM + AGI AI. what would happend to us?
@anasinis-n9p3 күн бұрын
This is scary☠️☠️☠️
@gfan0034 күн бұрын
China Started First and already finish testing the quantum chip, China planned to mass produce these quantum chips for PC in 2025. With the raw material ban China placed on US and US affiliated countries That it would be hard for US to source enough materials to manufacture the chip.
@harrycontacts64943 күн бұрын
🇮🇳
@Jes-4-us4 күн бұрын
Welcome back out of the Matrix ✌️🫶☀️
@Calico_Man5 күн бұрын
🤯
@felipeguevara30424 күн бұрын
I dont think she is an expert.
@GAMINGRALPH-b5x4 күн бұрын
So called experts has failed us with jargons .We understand her
@aleksandargurzan4 күн бұрын
Fancy tech big BS
@ahmednassar17385 күн бұрын
Hoax by India 🇮🇳 head of google 😊
@JigilJigil5 күн бұрын
The guy has been the worst Google CEO so far; there have been debates over his dismissal for a couple of years now.
@holywarrior57194 күн бұрын
The entire Quran and your community is a big failure, it’s a failed ideology and a nuisance to humanity, so you guys are jealous about Google ceo who is an absolute success. Even your entire world community has not produced a guy who is fit to clean the ceo s toliet. Ofcoursenyou aasmani Kitab cane be used as toilet paper.
@holywarrior57194 күн бұрын
You guys are a big failure and can only be jealous of others such as hindus. Arabs don’t even spit on you guys.
@holywarrior57194 күн бұрын
You are feeling jealous of a great ceo. Do you know that your entire community is a big failure and a nuisance to humanity . You guys know nothing about science because your book teaches you nothing but hate.
@holywarrior57194 күн бұрын
You are feeling jealous of a great ceo. Do you know that you guys are a big failure and a nuisance to humanity . Don’t comment on something that you will never understand.