Gravitas: Is the Chinese Navy a hollow force?

[@ankushzap]

Bully are actually the most scared ones.

[@Dreamy_Gates]

the quiet one is the scared one.

[@sheegeenpeeng2387]

@@Dreamy_Gates Until he reaches into his backpack..

[@tforaodg]

And 1962?

[@sheegeenpeeng2387]

@@tforaodg and 1967?

[@ssuwandi3240]

Hope they run out of foods.. i heard it is snowing in Beijing.. disgusting war

[@richardelijah4881]

Ahhhh , the soldiers are crying, they will die for a problem they didn't cause.

[@opinion4246]

Yeah,u know if they wanted peace they know how.

[@kubulsham]

When we Indians talk negatively about something, anything, we are jealous of it or most probably, scared to death about it. I know, because I'm still in prison thanks to India

[@googlgfacef218]

The chinese PLA female soldiers are definitely more valuable. They can always invade us, we dont mind!

[@j2bakachampionbwoy846]

Have you seen the video by China showing Indian soldiers being blindfolded and paraded like cows at a cattle auction? 😂

[@Grimvalor_]

@@j2bakachampionbwoy846 have you seen old surrender video of Pakistan in 1971

[@variantofconcern1735]

"if you are weak appear strong. If you are strong appear weak." Sun Tzu

[@Mar-ec7et]

Loud mouth India... will always be big mouth

[@tntmangamer300]

Bro its all fun and laugher until they hear the saying, It doesn't matter whos got the biggest stick, what matters is how to use it lmao

[@TraderRobin]

Hahaha....yeah, it's amazing just how many wars the Chinese LOST, after that book was written!!

[@AdmiralBonetoPick]

"A day without a friend is like a pot without a single drop of honey left inside." - Xi Jinping

[@thelegend1264]

@@AdmiralBonetoPick -10000000 social credits for mentioning honey and Xi together

[@nazareth8199]

I love this lady. She brings the hard-core news and she is a throw back journalist who brings the facts. She also educates her viewers with her wit, charisma, and her political satire of world tyrants. I love it lol

[@bernardchipolepole9381]

Youre. Right i love the way she says it....

[@OurHistoryT.C.W]

I think this lady support india and also her channel. I thought this is international news but looks like it isn't. I think she holdings her country's opinion. That is not good. She completely destroying principles of mass media..

[@fakewhiteman3412]

If Chinese want to do evil why start now,Chinese invent compass and gunpowder, white man used them to do tons of evil earn tons of gold, Anglo Saxon earn 45 trillion from India

[@newdelphi1883]

I mean it's Hindu Nationalist Fox News but I definitely love her firey delivery

[@TheVenge.]

Made in China ships are very advanced, those ships work like submarines they sink to the bottom of the ocean.

[@भारतहूँइंडियानहीं]

🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@EAGEEYE321]

Too much proud also make people weaker and foolish

[@LosizakII]

LOL

[@parallax9281]

😆😆😂😆😆

[@supernovabristol9468]

@@भारतहूँइंडियानहीं Bhaarat hoon... India nahee.... 💪 🇮🇳 🚩 🕉️ 🚩 🕉️

[@ahmedthasleem4627]

His vessels are better off, anchored in safe waters...🤣🤣😳🤣🤣This girl will kill me with Laughter..LMAO 😆 🤣

[@mysterycambodia]

Remember Pearl Harbour?

[@souvikbera3067]

@@mysterycambodia Remeber the response ?

[@thelegend1264]

@@souvikbera3067 remember Savo Islands?

[@paganpriest4792]

@@thelegend1264 do you remember that? Good for you.

[@TheRawfishking]

It's easy to shoot at a target, as long as the "Target " doesn't shoot back. 🤷just saying .

[@priyankazala6857]

Hahaha🤣

[@sankarkollaboina6179]

Yup

[@rocker-zi2po]

Epic 👍😻👍

[@dmatheson1342]

and they couldn't even do that, their hypersonic missile missed it's target by 35km lol

[@ayi3455]

the CCP would boast that the crying soldiers are due to Love to the motherland...

[@egosumhomovespertilionem]

The People's Liberation Army Navy (yeah, that's really the full official name -- maybe it sounds better in Mandarin) has expanded rapidly over the last two decades, and has some impressive looking warships. What it lacks is any actual naval battle experience since the formation of the People's Republic of China in 1946-47. The U.S. Navy, on the other hand, has fought two major world wars (winning both) and has been projecting American power around the world for over 100 years. The U.S. Navy has more combat experience in the East China Sea and South China Sea than China does. And the U.S. Navy in Asia is solidly and silently backed by the very professional Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force, which may just be one of the two or three most professional navies in the world today. Add the Indians and the Aussies to the mix, and the PLA Navy does not look quite as intimidating.

[@我想要一个茶杯]

"The People's Liberation Army" Liberating Peoples life you mean?🤣🤣🤣

[@ML-rd6ci]

Modern China is what every Chinese feels ashamed of.

[@surfrat8884]

Bingo

[@gyan8201]

The crying noodles …. What a punch 😂😂😂🤣

[@adipurush2]

“The Chinese structure is perfect” *gap* “for delaying a decision.” 😂😂 Palki knows how to bring the listeners to the edge of their seat.

[@alexdias8627]

China and russia are green navy and regional air force projection... those hipersonic missiles from china and russia are not combat tested ...

[@kubulsham]

When we Indians talk negatively about something, anything, we are jealous of it or most probably, scared to death about it. I know, because I'm still in prison thanks to India

[@j2bakachampionbwoy846]

Indians love a good laugh even though the PLA Navy is busy building their ports in Djibouti, Gwadar, Hambantota, Laamu Atoll and Kyaukphin. Soon Indian fisherman would need Chinese visa to fish off the coast of India 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@tkumar2006]

@@j2bakachampionbwoy846 USSR was also providing visa to middle Asia but latter what happened every one know

[@tkumar2006]

PLA is like elephant teeth they don't have any war experience

[@scooter5301]

" Everyone has a plan until they get a punch in the mouth" Mike Tyson.

[@bijubalakrishnan1773]

😂

[@lunafringe10]

or lose an ear

[@tntmangamer300]

china might have the biggest stick but what matters is if he can Use that stick in a matter of seconds anywhere, anytime

[@ngkeam9491]

@Saltys- a butt in the arse!!

[@donavonrobbins1908]

What will come first, China's biggest carrier currently under construction, or a giant new cargo plane that can load Chinese fighters with their armament after they launch from their current carrier?

[@captainobvious9233]

Think about WW2, the U.S had a navy larger than every other navy in the world combined and they had basically unlimited supplies. Despite all the firepower, the ability to easily replace lost equipment and have mountains of supplies on the beach by the end of the day, they still suffered heavy casualties taking tiny islands from starving Japanese Soldiers. How do you think China, with no experience in amphibious warfare and logistics is going to fare trying to conquer a huge, heavily fortified island, equipped with modern military technology and filled with millions of people capable of fighting back?

[@derrickhopioh]

may be you should revist Japanese empirical navy force

[@ajaykumarsingh702]

Chinese destroyers are far more advanced than American destroyers. They are also new as recently constructed from 2016-2022, compare to rusting decades of US navy ships. The only bullshit so called advantage of US navy is experience which won't save them from thousands of guided missiles and nuclear torpedoes.

[@laur-unstagenameactuallyca1587]

"the made in china pandemic" yooo i'm fucking deaddd 😂💀the way she just put that roast out there without no pause for us to digest it 💀💀💀💀

[@HLNA14]

2:34 💯

[@throwachair]

you two 6.66 ha ha

[@kyles9320]

She never holds back!

[@charlesseymour1482]

who are you? robot?

[@bernardochill2535]

Thambi. India is the world's biggest exporters of beef 🥩. 😋 😋 Hypocrites

[@TheKrish1972]

Vessel are better off anchored in safe waters - who actually writes these lines ??! Gold

[@mysterycambodia]

Just like Pearl Harbour?

[@donaldclifford5763]

@@mysterycambodia Were the Pearl Harbor ships safer at sea?

[@mysterycambodia]

@@donaldclifford5763 Off cause they, they had their aircraft carriers at sea on the morning Pearl Harbour was bombed so they were saved,

[@donaldclifford5763]

@@mysterycambodia At Pearl Harbor, Japan was on offense. In the S. China Sea, the West is looking to dissuade a Chinese offense. That's the difference.

[@mysterycambodia]

@@donaldclifford5763 Taiwan has already fallen, just the Chinese troops and government officials haven't arrived yet

[@fernarias]

China has a hypersonic missile that can strike anywhere on earth except for the target.

[@13shetty]

Missed the target by 38 km . China is not battle proven . If war happens then China will end up like ussr . But who knows .

[@HariHari-my7ez]

China hipersonic is not accurate. When China aim at US, the hipersonic always lands at Ganga river.

[@orecreeper2128]

If China fire a hypersonic missile from Beijing towards Washington, it will fall and detonate on Shanghai instead XD

[@georgenkosi7423]

@@orecreeper2128 all fun and games till it happens

[@JC-kc1qi]

Sometimes falls apart in orbit like last spring

[@gilbertfranklin1537]

Amazing that Palki has access to the real calculations of naval strength. She prepares well and presents her information very professionally. 👌😊

[@raymondgreen5700]

Wonder how she knows all the Chinese secrets.?

[@yeusean]

She talks with no clue.

[@akmalhafiz8763]

The problem having a political officer in a warships it will cause delay and chaos. Political officer will make a decision based on political matters while military officers make decisions based on calculated risk.

[@aryamanusmare1268]

💯

[@nafeesahmad2973]

., .. J8uui i

[@gc2696]

Good point... All very well the army political officers shoot their own soldiers if they retreat... How will that work on a ship ? Awkward shooting the captain in front of everyone...

[@gc2696]

@John Grigg Political Officers onboard ships had a high accident rate slipping on tea and breaking their bloody necks....

[@KS-kx6mr]

i suggest to put this lady commentator on board to direct the navy.

[@prabhukrishna6706]

The more ship's it has the more target practice for the Quad

[@cryptohornbill9658]

Cry baby cry 🤣🤣🤣🤣.

[@cryptohornbill9658]

Quad is useless 🤣 alliance.

[@aryamanusmare1268]

@wumao bat eater 🦇 🤣

[@aryamanusmare1268]

@@cryptohornbill9658 partially true/ false

[@timchan2624]

I love the way you talk HARE KRISHNA HARE QUAD !

[@jeffedwards2444]

Three points: China does not have a huge lengthy coastline, they are susceptible to blockade and most of their industrial capacity relies on imports. That will get strangled and starved. Just like Germany and Japan in WW2. Second, the US and their Allies have many small carriers, call them helicopter carriers, where they can deploy assets like the f35. Last, the USN and all their allies navies are well drilled and experience in co-ordinated naval operations. When has China done anything at sea? I haven't even mentioned how forward deployment of assets by the west or air forces will figure into this scenario. Both sides, if they are smart, will want to avoid this conflict.

[@cliveyb5326]

Quantity is not a match against quality equipment, troops, & training. History is full of examples.

[@Facts..Checker]

Yes totally agreed, especially nowadays China is in the forefront in Quantum Communication, Quantum/Classical Supercomputing, own chip design, electromagnetic catapult tech, laser, robotic, AI, Stealth fghters, hypersonic glider missiles, Photonic chip, EV, artificial sun reactor, tech, space exploration/station, super modern infrastructures, size, weaponry, financial strength, and a continue growing country, to name a few. Moreover, 40% + Taiwan economy is tied to the Mainland. Thus, China will not react hastily to the benefit of foreign powers. Time and Taiwan location is always on the mainland side. What has the West got it right on how China has managed to grow to their shocking and surprise. Except India, who thought that they r already way ahead in leaps and bounds. Well at least u dun qualify to a US's competitor for nothing, Democratic or not will face the same consequences.

[@utyytrfdujgf6109]

Russia ww2 have quantity and destroy Germany only China will lose if China go to war because if America and Europe and india fight for tawain than china will lose if America and Europe and india do nothing and don't fight for tawain than Taiwan lose why will see if it happens

[@Facts..Checker]

India is a good example.isnt it, massive, with limited indigenous weapon capability, full of multinational bought weapons/systems integration and lacking much developments of self sufficiency. Foreign suppliers r v happy and India enjoys the ego. Do agree that by having modern weaponry has some potential stinks but can be easily crashed due to the same like skills, replacement and upgrading abilities as they r all foreign made.

[@stefchris2067]

Yea and china's GDP is 5 times that of Indian's. Quality = 💰

[@dmatheson1342]

@@19hbytuy the chinese people would finally be free, whats left of them

[@russ4650]

Chinese Navy: Indian Navy will choke our lifeline 😭 (malacca strait)

[@sheegeenpeeng2387]

I like to get choked by daddy Modi.

[@russ4650]

@@sheegeenpeeng2387 😂😂😂

[@dadidadida123]

That’s really interesting. Why India wants to invite China to pay attention to India’s navy?

[@kviolin1313]

Ismt chinese navy more advanced? Try a quick google check

[@huangpeter864]

By india??? 3rd world india per capita 1800, hunger index 101 of 116, and trying to choke a superpower?

[@nickfarmer7868]

China has gone for volume in terms of the total number of ships, but still has only half the tonnage of US Navy. Chinese destroyers and cruisers are about half the size of USN equivalents.

[@eleethtahgra7182]

Yup, n pentagon is using that to push for higher defense budget. Poor democrats cant get as much money they want for construction bill.

[@suedenim6590]

Well never know the true size though because they'll pixilate them out through embaressment 😉

[@eleethtahgra7182]

@William the conqueror hypersonic missiles go BRRRRTTTTTTT

[@eleethtahgra7182]

@ST Meaning they wouldnt last 1 month of ocean voyage. Or one month of river voyage. Yet they periodically do patrol around somalia to protect their trade vessels from pirates. Also, the many amount of training and joint drill. None of them sink yet....unlike usa submarine n usa f35.

[@akajoshua2324]

its mostly because of the tonnage of US 9 other Super carriers, warships are approximately the same

[@chrismarshall6647]

The American navy is a force to reckon with . The size and most importantly the quality of there sailors sets them apart from a large adversary that is not battle tested on the high seas .

[@psychoaztecs]

theres always a saying "don't underestimate your enemy, always assume for the worst" - i hope US staying true to that mantra after the experience they had during ww2.

[@hongyanyu5868]

⁸

[@DOI_ARTS]

Dont worry US was always prepared China will just say "When?"

[@Jojo_Bee]

Or Vietnam...

[@afroronin9398]

@@Jojo_Bee tv beat us in vietnam... no tv, no hippies protesting, no protesting, we just bomb them back into the stone ages... we win... gotta look at the whole pic...

[@omarionbayley9721]

@@Jojo_Bee lol fools

[@lordstingray2382]

They may have more ships but it's not about how many you have, it's about how good they are. Quality over quantity. They're carriers aren't the same or as big or as good as the Nimitz class the US has. No country on the planet has carrier battle groups like the US Navy does

[@justthefacts5008]

No country on the planet has carrier battle groups like the US Navy does; then tell the world how the hell the US loss the Viet Nam and the Korea War??? All those US and its western allies' aircraft carriers are "sitting duck" in the China's door steps. Nobody or any country would loss any war right at its own door steps and its backyard. The US and its "quad" should learn their lesson on the Viet Nam war and the Korea War. Only needs hundreds of missiles will sink them all. China doesn't even need to deploy its hypersonic missiles to waste the money.

[@egosumhomovespertilionem]

@@justthefacts5008 So riddle me this, Batman: Who won the Korean War? An awful lot of North Koreans and Chinese died, only to see the status quo ante restored after 3 years of bloodshed.

[@КириллПерваков-м4э]

and our submarinis will sank them)

[@kelleychilton2524]

@@КириллПерваков-м4э Your submarines are crap. There's one sitting at the bottom of the ocean right now that went down just a few years ago .... because it was crap!!! 💩💩

[@Brian-om2hh]

The conscript crews are likely to be a weak link too. Corruption is allegedly rife in the PLA navy, with many "Officers" having bought their rank rather than earned it through experience etc. Are men like these *really* going to hold it together in the heat of battle?

[@komradedoge8108]

Brahmos at Malacca strait: aao kabhi haveli pe 🗿

[@भारतहूँइंडियानहीं]

🤣👍👍

[@kviolin1313]

Overconfident fool

[@j2bakachampionbwoy846]

Indians always talk about their so called bra-moose or acne missiles (pardon the spelling) as if nobody else posses any of that sort 😂

[@selmonboi7929]

@@j2bakachampionbwoy846 abe kahase hai tu

[@Dangermonkey1000]

@@j2bakachampionbwoy846 .......bantsoup......sruuuup

[@Rishi123456789]

"Gravitas: Is the Chinese Navy a hollow force?" Yes it is.

[@PakPhorenMinistr]

Andaman & Nicobar Islands exist* Chynese navy: breathing heavily

[@cumber8549]

@@johnny8164 you do this for a living?

[@royal1932]

@@johnny8164 Ola hu uber 💣💥kaboom

[@satyamsoni1004]

I don't get why muslims support china What they did with Uighers still they support china 😂😂

[@venomoo7443]

@@johnny8164 The port u mentioned they are not neval bases means this port don't have defence system to protect them from incoming missile attacks ....and if india block the Malacca state how will supplies to your so called neval bases(gwadar , Hambantota, Djibouti) and how they will import oil. Jai sree ram love from india

[@souptikpanja3735]

@@johnny8164 first of all Chittagong is out of question BD is out of the league ; for Djibouti ; the deal was not for maritime action besides US & India has ports in Seychelles & madagascar ; & for Gwadar who forgets Al Zimura or Cha Bahar

[@martensonlee8815]

War takes a lot of skill....and anyone that's gone to battle know experience is needed...

[@donaldclifford5763]

China is not a warrior nation. More like paper dragon. All show, no go.

[@richardpluim4426]

@@donaldclifford5763 It runs on coal.

[@donaldclifford5763]

@@richardpluim4426 The CCP presents the illusion of a preeminent super power. That stagecraft has a limited shelf life.

[@richardpluim4426]

@@donaldclifford5763 So true Donald. China may be buying hardware for war, but they are not battle hardened. They do not invent or create. China just steal's other peoples ideas. A nation like that is just a flash in the pan.

[@mossion]

This is very true

[@naiyayika]

China doesn't have the one thing which is *pure experience and moral backing* to fight. Good, that makes it _beatable._ 4:46 😄Why Palki ma? PLA must be cringing

[@peterm13]

They have experience in shooting unarmed monks fleeing across Himalaya. And poisoning whistleblower doctors. The regimes old CCP men are "strong" also, for example glorious comrade Zhang Gaoli is able to have intercourse with young Chinese tennis players.

[@purplepapi6112]

@@peterm13 And running tanks over unarmed students.

[@EAGEEYE321]

Usa had no experience in world war 1 still won

[@leaderindia2192]

Yes, India said the same in 1962. China only used 30,000 troops to completely defeat the whole of India.

[@DanKann86]

@@EAGEEYE321 Actually, the US has many wars throughout its history since independence. There is the Mexican-American War ended in 1848, the Civil War ended in 1865 and the Spanish-American War in 1898 just before WWI.

[@michaelgouda7882]

The media really needs to understand that a Navy's strength is not based on the number of vessels. China does not have anywhere near the world's most powerful navy. When it comes to Naval strength tonnage is what matters. United States - 4,615,893 China - 1,820,475

[@sadekinahmad5599]

Greece : we have "Alexander" America : we have "Einstein" india : we have "Palki"

[@habungapa138]

India:-we have modi

[@lakshusharma4548]

You are comparing a journalist with Albert Einstein. Like seriously. Albert Einstein was one of the greatest scientific minds of all times.

[@mykeralajob104]

Myth Chinese naavy: mega navy Reality: hidden weakness 😂😂😂

[@danishqureshi9350]

They are strong don't be a fool they are economically stronger than us so they can afford such wars

[@aryamanusmare1268]

@ abhijith byju ......... never underestimate your enemy

[@jacky4365]

Then what fucking india are worried about? Always make rumor

[@aryamanusmare1268]

@@jacky4365 what do u wanna sau

[@fjinnw3019]

India navy is last in the world, what does it say. I guess it means last.

[@danapeck5382]

Better analysis than anything I encounter in the US media and all but highly specialized podcasts. Much appreciated and all the best.

[@Misaka-gt5yj]

The US media these days is not to inform you but to persuade you, which is unfortunate.

[@chinogixxer7506]

Lol. Funniest comment on here😆😆

[@Jake-dh9qk]

You do realize this is an Indian government contorlled news right? Its biased af

[@danapeck5382]

@@Jake-dh9qk yep, good way to get a sense of actual (vs stated) government policy. why I critically read a variety of sources.

[@robinterry8292]

What do you expect the radical left wing talking heads in the US liberal media is to busy blaming black Americans for being white supremacist or a white young man that defends himself against white attackers that are trying to kill him as a white supremacist vigilante. They are more concerned with condemning anything and everything that is contrary to the views of the progressive left wing Marxist agenda, than reporting news.

[@julioalvarez7301]

"But we spot them crying" 😂🤣 palki a savage ❤️ you're the best palki Sharma

[@kaneohe47]

There's a military officer and a communist bureaucrat on every ship? Hey, that's terrific! May the bureaucracy maintain it's presence in perpetuity.

[@orlock20]

Chances are that the military officer got that position because of bribes.

[@friedabernasher4680]

This is because China fears a naval rebellion.

[@mdinjamamulhaque9873]

Made in china pandemic 🔥😂

[@kubulsham]

When we Indians talk negatively about something, anything, we are jealous of it or most probably, scared to death about it. I know, because I'm still in prison thanks to India

[@tforaodg]

@@kubulsham I think 🤔 you are right about that.

[@timothysauder8222]

I like the way she talks by giving people time to think by pausing in her speech. Easier to listen to and follow. Great journalist.

[@satoshionamoto]

Keep going! I'm really happy I found this channel. It's mostly based in facts and a few opinions which are gold. Thank you.

[@rogermoore27]

Update: Xi JinPing told me they now have 10 billion soldiers, 100 bazillion aircrafts and 10 trillion tanks

[@americanpatriot3746]

10B soldier's? How So? China population is only 1.3B

[@MaverickMaratha]

Which drink!?

[@shaikmujahid749]

@@americanpatriot3746 he is in ncb office along with aryan 🤣🤣

[@shaikmujahid749]

@@MaverickMaratha he is in ncb office along with aryan..ignore him

[@MaverickMaratha]

@@shaikmujahid749 And might be close to our latest Toast - Nawab Bhangarawala. 😜

[@jascrandom9855]

That Two-person command structure will be China's biggest achilles heel.

[@fortcastlevgn2368]

Lol i was just thinking... go in take control of all their ships during night and bring them back on your side whoevere stole the free boats xD

[@kensmith8152]

China does not have the long naval tradition that the United States, Australia, Japan and the European states have. They may have the ships but not a well developed naval doctrine.

[@gigacanno750]

@Jack Ryan Doesn't mean that China can easily overpower multiple naval forces that have worked together for decades.

[@Brian-om2hh]

A.K.A. All the gear, but no idea......

[@gigacanno750]

@@Brian-om2hh Sounds about right. Plus the men will need to be trained to deal with targets that shoot back.

[@josef-peterroemer6235]

You mean long tradition of killing people around the world in the name of freedom.

[@marinamile]

By far , Palki is one of the best journalists in the world today. So refreshing.

[@robertknotoff3389]

People are not changing there ways ? Everyone goes into a store and supports it . We may all pay the ultimate price for this .

[@onlypendants]

Agreed. All the more important to support manufacturing in other countries. After all China is only a manufacturing hub..not a creative one. Please look towards India, Vietnam, Phillipines, Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia and even Bangladesh. We have fed the lizard so much that it has now turned into a fire spewing Dragon. 🙏🏼

[@lputop4163]

true

[@ThereWeWere-Gone]

@@onlypendants Not a fire spewing dragon but a KOMODO DRAGON witch bites you , infects you with multiple strains of bacteria , waits for you to die and then bites off chunks of your corpse at it’s leisure !

[@doneB830]

Yes stop buying there products.

[@mukhtarb6737]

China should fix his unruly neighbours like India do like USA did with middle eastern countries divided in small small country first Kashmir 2 khalstan first hand and it will be very good to create loyal friends.

[@mdmarko]

The Chinese Navy has ZERO combat experience, very little experience in combined-arms operations. In case of war, the Chinese Navy's time would be short, but exciting.

[@DreadX10]

This! They will be fighting their 'internal power-struggle' while being pounded on by the rest of the world.

[@gungatz6696]

455+ Navy ship's is useless if you don't have allays. What if shit goes down and your enemies started a maritime alliance. Even if you the world's biggest Troops and Navy's is useless if you're army never experienced War.

[@gigacanno750]

You can say that about literally all of China's armed forces since 1979, excluding any incidents along the Indian border. Chinese military drills don't prep the troops properly. They train to win, which is valid, but what they don't look for in training is mistakes and problems.

[@Brian-om2hh]

@@gigacanno750 Their training is also extremely rigid and formal. The vast majority of Chinese service personnel will be trained to act only on orders and instructions. Thinking for yourself in the heat of battle will be out of the question.

[@N000name]

I liked the part when she said "Made in China Pandemic" 😂

[@aminuaidara8601]

how can she forget saying that considering the hit she have against the Chinese evil regime my problem with today's journalist its their hypocrisy double standard they can't even hide it

[@clementchin6353]

She must have failed her science subject in school.

[@narutohenaruto]

@@clementchin6353 its true though, snowflake

[@ethanbarlow1804]

It's not all about numbers, though. You have to consider technological superiority. The U.S. puts significantly more money into research and development of high tech weaponry than China. The. U.S. has the most capable & deadly navy on earth. Combined with NATO allies, it's a totally different ballgame.

[@johnbuckles1344]

And so why have we been struggling to field a working hypersonic missile? This style of overconfidence reminds me of the pre-war attitudes we held about Japan in WWII. Even though Japan had the worlds largest navy in 1941, we just fell back on racist stereotypes about bucktoothed, thick eyeglass wearing primatives. No one really thought they would hit Pearl. Taking Indonesia with its oil seemed more likely. Instead, both happened. We found out the hard way that the Japanese had better torpedoes, better night fighting capability and for a short while better aircraft. Reality can be a nasty thing.

[@hmnanda]

@@johnbuckles1344 chances are that US already developed hypersonic technology for a while but just kept it secret since chinese like to steal intel.

[@johnbuckles1344]

@@hmnanda Perhaps. Seeing as Russia and China both have tested and deployed these weapons, there is not much intel to be gained for them. No need to keep secret that which your opponent already has.

[@zackdoc]

Yeah, but their hypersonic missile missed the target by 24 miles.

[@alanyam2560]

That was their actual target!! 100 % accuratecy!! No miss.. bang on target!! Anyway... did they inform the world where their practice target was in the first place??

[@SM2005_]

It was actually 200 km off.

[@harryconover289]

Don’t fool yourself with nukes 20 mile is close enough and it was a FIRST test I am sure they will get better

[@TheSharmaFilms]

@Crow Fly here comes a crying Chinese soldier😂😂

[@wiser3754]

The nuclear explosion and fallout from the missed target would make up for it.

[@josefarrington]

More naval ships doesn't imply more naval capability. Quality/Innovation can trump quantity.

[@nevilleabbott2330]

I love how she said, American has 11 air craft carriers, all nuclear powered, China has two😒

[@lunafringe10]

dont forget the US nuclear submarines .

[@darrylmuse9948]

And don’t forget our Assault ships with Marine F35 lightings on them along with Marines

[@uncanny3637]

@@darrylmuse9948 USA too op. Only thing you guys need is space warships.

[@darrylmuse9948]

@@uncanny3637 who knows what we are working especially at skunkworks lol

[@uncanny3637]

@@darrylmuse9948 You guys probably testing it in a civilian property (Well what heard off).

[@Justone372]

Plain and simple YES.

[@ravsinghrajput2105]

the US Navy is the strongest navy in the world. It owns 480 ships, 50,000 non-combat vehicles, 290 deployable combat vessels and 3,900 plus manned aircraft... *23 carriers* by ahead of the rest of the world combined...

[@marjanp]

Carriers are easy target and super expensive, we're not in 1945 and China is much more advanced than Japanese in WW2.

[@eq1373]

@@marjanp how do you figure carriers are an easy target? You have to find them first, and it's a huge ocean.

[@biduukorona3304]

@@eq1373 not only that all US carriers are nuclear powered aka finding them might not be to your advantage afterall lol

[@TheKumarmanoj]

Carriers are easy target....lol...seriously...what does the whole fleet that moves along d carrier is for then ??? TO GET HIT 😝😝

[@justthefacts5008]

But the US Navy could not fight. The US loss both in the Viet Nam and in the Korea War and the US Navy got many ships involved.

[@champaklaljayantilalgada842]

میں بلوچ ہوں۔ ہماری مدد کریں. ہم پاکستان میں نہیں رہنا چاہتے تھے۔ ہم اپنا آزاد ملک چاہتے ہیں۔ براہ مہربانی ہماری مدد کریں

[@mukkalamaheshnarasimha3861]

Be patience bro..may your dream come true..💐💐💐

[@champaklaljayantilalgada842]

@@mukkalamaheshnarasimha3861 thanks brother ☺️☺️

[@dailyvideo2191]

Indian army coming to rescue you.... Sit tight....

[@harisk4151]

@@champaklaljayantilalgada842 Indian bot

[@kviolin1313]

Dont trust indians... where is the help? Go to the UN

[@darcymcnabb9259]

The chiness military fighting ability can be summed up in 2 battles ..the battle of Kapyong and Yuldong. The chiness can not fight but they sure do make for great targets for militaries that can fight .

[@lesliecheung1478]

If the Chinese was so weak....then explain why the US needs all its buddies and India jumping in to help ?

[@revolutionarydragon1123]

@@lesliecheung1478 that and should have crushed them in the Korean war

[@charttrakarn3438]

But at the end, who were the one that ran away…from Vietnam, Afganistan and many more ahead.

[@charttrakarn3438]

Opium War 1839-1860. Shameless 8-1 and now looking for 12-1 Shameless many times more. And India has always been on their sides, China did not forget!

[@charttrakarn3438]

One day ……

[@samhaskins2506]

Thank you so much Palki for your very pointed and succinct appraisal of China's navy, subscribed, liked and comment!

[@kkkiren599]

The greatest mistakes that the history of Naval conflict has often repeated is that you underestimate an adversary before combat. In war you neither underprepare before " contact" nor do you rest even after " success". War has no rules. Pearl Harbour did not stop US . Even the unsinkable battleship Bismark was sunk etc etc. Action only can " speak" for itself. Never lower your guard

[@nokaut456]

Vietnam war... another good example,never understimate your enemy..

[@richardpluim4426]

The next war will be a COME AS YOU ARE WAR....Gwynne Dyer

[@edraven693]

@@nokaut456 don't you think we were fighting the Chinese military in Vietnam

[@sery1965]

@@nokaut456 That was a political retired "Idiot".

[@Tankerpaul223]

Very well said!

[@RS-jp7fq]

These are paper ships. All we need to do is to fire more missiles.

[@EAGEEYE321]

To much proud is also make people weaker and foolish

[@tforaodg]

@@EAGEEYE321 don't tell them that. Let them live in the dream

[@andrewngo9995]

all bark still no bite, paper ship yet all you guys do is talk and type behind the keyboard. we all know china would wipe out india on a one on one war. keep being delusional

[@shamanbhattacharyya9285]

@@andrewngo9995 in your dreams will China be able to defeat India

[@RS-jp7fq]

@@andrewngo9995 The last time chyna messed with India 35-45 chynese paper tigers died compared to 20 of India. keep dreaming.

[@superduper5514]

China has the quantity but no quality. Everything in China is made of tofu. Nothing to be afraid of.

[@peterm13]

Still must be afraid. Tofu is heavy metal poisoned, water is arsenic, even milk is poisonous with melanine. You get cancer from the "CCP tofu". Before 1949 everything was clean, 70 years later everything is destroyed.

[@superduper5514]

@Crow Fly China has the quantity but never the quality. China’s military can never surpass its U.S. counterpart. Let’s again try to compare 50 years from now. Lesser than that would be too soon.

[@superduper5514]

@Crow Fly That’s true, quantity-wise. Now do you want me to go back into the cave?

[@superduper5514]

@Crow Fly Not for very long now that the West are aware of China stealing technologies. This will be the start of China’s stagnation. It won’t happen overnight but it’s heading towards that the direction. BTW, China is not rich. It’s the CCP corrupt elite members that are rich. How can you call a country rich when half the population are earning a mere $1.50 a day? Country side people are eating grass like during the 60s. Go back to your cave & hibernate.

[@mrsmith3403]

The INDIAN are buying TOFU in record numbers.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@cerealaugher]

they should learn from the wise Bruce Lee "boards don't hit back"

[@battulasaritha4066]

😆😆😆😆😆🥳😝 super u are currect dood

[@lazyhusband]

The Chinese troops are a bunch of wimps when push comes to shove.

[@alexanderquiah453]

This report made me smile at the soldiers crying... Phiki Phiki

[@KiethXy]

I would never fight for the politicians but I would fight for my country.

[@Cotswolds1913]

For those watching the beginning of this vid getting the wrong impression; China has only one third of the United States' naval tonnage. That's right, it's only a third of the size. And an even more relevant metric, deliverable missiles/payload of all vessels and aircraft, the margin is much bigger than 3 to 1, because of America's 11 Supercarriers, plus 10 more regular sized carriers.

[@shreepanicker]

Which is the reason the Chinese Navy can't be considered a blue water navy. But the point she's making is something else altogether......even while the Chinese may have numbers that can overawe opponents their quality, both in terms of men and material, is questionable.

[@Cotswolds1913]

@@shreepanicker I also don't want Indians to get the wrong impression, that the Chinese Navy is some monstrosity that they have no hope of ever standing up to and thus a kind of "let's just depend on the Americans" mentality sets in. I don't want that, I want India to see the importance of their Navy, & that with a powerful one they could actually cobble together their own, more tight-knit group of allies (maybe with the UK, Singapore, UAE), for the purposes of helping India dominate the Indian Ocean region, and not being strategically dependent on the relatively more belligerent Americans, whom also....likely aren't on the table for a free trade agreement, whereas other countries, there would be potential for pursuing deeper ties at both the security level and economic level. Rant over :P

[@suedenim6590]

We'll never really know the true size friend because they'll pixilate them through embaressment. 😉 Look. They're gonna be great as long as the US is sailing its naval flotilla through the desert.......wait

[@lr3.3]

@@suedenim6590 they're imitators, not innovators. Nothing against the chinese people as such, but lets face it the products they make are shite.

[@johnbuckles1344]

@@lr3.3 Like those iPhones?

[@jakebaba2149]

When watching Palki Sharma, all I see and have in mind about her is news, commentary, analysis of politics, current affairs and then I wonder if Ms Sharma ever thinks or talks about any other issue like her motherhood, fashion, make up, her beautiful ear rings, her children, dinner with family; life's day to day, simple issues. She has complete command of her brief and her delivery is great and engaging, never boring. She is good at her job.

[@David-ut3zv]

If what this woman said were true, there is no threat! Everyone can relax and be happy. I look forward to her analysis on the Indian Navy which must be a formidable force😊!

[@ananeya6713]

one of the biggest mistake u could make is underestimate ur enemy. It feels like ur trying to assure ur self sth.

[@joex2504]

The explosion of a single new Russian topedo strategicaly placed in the China sea would push the whole Chinese fleet into remote mainland China..

[@youtubeaqua7796]

Poseidon

[@onlypendants]

@covid 1234 Russia is not a fool to trust backstabber China.

[@КириллПерваков-м4э]

but Russia will not do it. We will atack union of sucking animals (usa)

[@jasnooraroranoor4281]

They don't have the guts to face the Indian Navy, yes, but they can brag so much, no one can catch them 😌😅

[@chrisronald2856]

India? You mean surrendered india army?

[@megha8783]

@Chicka Boom Boom keeep cryng kid! 😂😂

[@shamanbhattacharyya9285]

@@chrisronald2856 it's actually the other way around

[@mohitarora5145]

@@chrisronald2856 Pak army did record surrender. Next will be China...

[@chrisronald2856]

@@shamanbhattacharyya9285 but in the videos and pics I saw india surrendered, like gentle sheep knee on the ground 😂

[@michaeldobson107]

And Russia was supposed to take Ukraine in three days. lol. Also, China being the "largest navy in the world" is something of a misnomer. China's navy is primarily a "green water navy," not a "blue water navy," meaning that its ships cannot move too far out from China's coastline. Certainly, it is incapable of any meaningful "worldwide power projection" in any way, shape or form (unlike the US or UK) Also, the number of ships is comprised mostly of smaller vessels, frigates and coast guard cutters, not front line warships like aircraft carriers, battleships and missile cruisers. More does not mean "more powerful" or "more capable." China is playing a numbers game and hoping no one actually takes a closer look.

[@pauldavis9387]

The Chinese have two aircraft carriers. We have 11. The Chinese don’t know how to properly use them we do. The Chinese don’t have interlocking systems that coordinate between Satalite’s, ships, ground,etc. We do and have been doing it for decades. Quality not quantity.

[@nobody687]

Naval warfare has a helluva learning curve. When one ship can destroy many , numbers do not matter. If it has a superior advantage it will sink them all. The biggest advantage is the navy's experience and understanding of combat. Something you cannot get from simulation.

[@justthefacts5008]

You must talking about the US Navy? That why US loss both the Viet Nam and Korea War --- many US Navy ships involved in those wars.

[@kelleychilton2524]

@@justthefacts5008 You don't even have a clue. You should just stop with your uninformed and asinine comments.

[@michaeldobson107]

@@justthefacts5008 The US did not "lose" either of those wars, stupid. Public and political opinion caused the US to pull out both her support, money and troops from those conflicts and both sides came to the bargaining table. That is not losing a war. Get an education.

[@jackmehoff9517]

@@justthefacts5008 US didn’t lose Korea

[@MrPoornakumar]

@@justthefacts5008 Viet Nam and Korea Wars are less of military wars, but more political wars. Before the (US) military personnel were mounting the attack, their political bosses decided to abandon or abort the mission. It gives enough breathing pause for the adversary to regroup, plan afresh based on what they've seen (of the other).

[@AnonymousAnonymous-dc3jm]

China is good at Quantity, not good at quality, and in military, it's quality that matters not quantity.

[@nysteven1]

That’s not always true, when you have quantity over quality in war it mostly falls on the will of the people. Two examples are the Qing dynasty in the opium wars and the soviets in the Second World War. Both sides threw their people into slaughters but the Soviet people had more will power to win. So the question really falls down to how strong is the will power of the people of china

[@EAGEEYE321]

So intelligent you are...world needs you

[@arturosiew2043]

@@nysteven1 modern war is not about population but financial capability to project power across the world. Big population is nothing if you cannot move them across the world.

[@peanutbar8882]

you really think countries compromise on quality when it comes to something serious like Military?

[@EAGEEYE321]

@@peanutbar8882 they are indian they will say anything

[@josephryan9230]

Naval warfare is absolutely brutal. After the German Navy won the battle of Coronel on 1 Nov 1914 against the Royal Navy, off the coast of Chile, Vice Admiral von Spee refused a bouquet of flowers in celebration, saying "these will do nicely on my grave." A month later, he and most of his fleet were sunk by the British on 8 Dec 1914 in the Battle of the Falkland Islands. With no naval combat experience whatsoever and with a fleet used to operating close to home waters, the Chinese navy is not prepared for the brutal realities of naval warfare, against a well-trained and experienced opponent. The more recent Falklands conflict, launched by the Argentinian navy, resulted in the fall of the military junta after their humiliating defeat by the British. The Chinese should think long and hard before launching a war of choice whose consequences no one can forsee.

[@albertosolon8769]

EXPERIENCE MAKE THE DIFFERENCE IN ACTUAL BATTLE.PILIPINO ONLY LACK OF EQUIPMENT BUT THE ABILITY TO DO IS FAR BEYOND COMPARE. THATs IT PANGYAO

[@coutinhorio99]

give me 100 filipino and i can win something big...phillippine doesnt need any advance weapon,only needs men in real battle....

[@djcubical]

Having the largest navy vs the most advanced military on Earth who loves war isn't anything to be afraid of.

[@tonysu8860]

China has the largest navy only in total number of anything that can float and mount a gun on it. If you scratch the surface and look deeper, China hardly has anything that can actually accomplish a particular mission... Like air superiority, amphibious invasion which would require capable assets training and logistic support or even anything that can or would be used to protect those Chinese fishing fleets that violate economic zones. Six years ago, China had a couple aircraft carriers with no planes capable of carrier operations, no amphibious ships of any consequence, an air force with maybe 5 fighters capable of threatening a Russian, American or EU fighter or bomber fleet. Today, China's military is marginally better, it has the same 2 aircraft carriers with a 3rd about to launch, still no carrier aircraft, 2-6 amphibious ships, the same handful of air force aircraft plus 2 models (J-10C, J-20) getting closer to possibly mounting a minimal threat and demonstrated expertise in missiles of many types. The bottom line is that even today, it's unlikely that China could invade anywhere where advanced American, European or Russian military technology exists and probably still couldn't in the next 10 years at current ship building trends, but would possibly get closer to where a non-military leader could make a very stupid and costly mistake. China can bully nations that don't ask for support from AUKUS, Japan or Taiwan, but should avoid confronting anything more powerful. This is what the world may need to consider... Not any kind of successful Chinese invasion of Taiwan, the South China Sea, the East China Sea or the Sea of Japan, but the likely fact that China could simply cause damage to someone. And, it's problematic whether China could gain naval expertise to sail in the eastern Pacific, it's almost more likely that doing so would be more risk of breakdown and embarrassment than making a symbolic threatening gesture.

[@ngkeam9491]

@John Grigg -pure fantasy!!

[@ngkeam9491]

@John Grigg - haha, your timeframe for it to brace up!!

[@creolecajun9988]

Ask yourself when has China ever fought a war and won? When has China even fought a war?

[@timothyortiz2222]

"Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering." - Master Yoda

[@wiser3754]

Emotion leads to irrarational behaviour.

[@kubulsham]

When we Indians talk negatively about something, anything, we are jealous of it or most probably, scared to death about it. I know, because I'm still in prison thanks to India

[@hamishgaffaney5323]

It's ture you can make fearful people do some pretty horrible things

[@simonkubelec6352]

And thank you WION for providing a platform for us to discuss this. Appreciate it.

[@icost4671]

The Chinese soldiers are crying because they're so emotional with their love for China 👏👏👏👏😭😭🖤

[@divishadhabhai2214]

🤣

[@Msd-m5n6h]

😂

[@niralsakhiya2051]

Thank you Palki for telling us not to worry, as they are perfect in taking late decisions.

[@acjo8975]

The world's largest navy? Only 2 aircraft carriers? Are you kidding? The US has 6 times that.

[@geo322242]

Traditionally China always thought more of itself than it actually was. Even it's martial arts are made for show, not actual fighting. They love show and numbers. I fear Russia more than I fear China in terms of real abilities.

[@AbhijeetKumar-vh1ff]

The martial art was taught by Indian buddhist monk to Chinese.

[@gigacanno750]

This comment regarding Russia has aged rather poorly.

[@MrTigurius]

Chinese troops and sailors have never been in a real fight. No battle plan survives first contact with the enemy. If they do attack Taiwan the Chinese military will receive the shock of their lives. They view the US as a walk over. The US has rightly or wrongly been fighting wars for most of the 21st century. It’s assets are highly trained and blooded. The shock of first engagement will be a shattering experience for Chinese troops. The horrors of the battlefield are mind numbing and on troops inexperienced can lead to significant unit disruption and subsequent breakdowns. I know from first hand experience in Vietnam. A reasonable Chinese leader would for go this lunacy. You not only have the US against you but the world now sees you for what you are.

[@seanmcgrady8688]

The US military is destabilized. White guilt, and American colonial guilt are being taught to US soldiers, and the threat of a vaccine mandate has brought sizable resignations from its established soldier base. The US army morale has been crippled, and it's not coming back until possibly next election. Meanwhile, the CCP has stated they will be ready to attack Taiwan by 2024. Do you think the US military will be better off by then, or worse?

[@wamnicho]

Do you think any American with common sense is going to fight china for the sake of Taiwan, wake up man. Am not dying for some island nation that I don't care about

[@iwanaknowe2380]

@@wamnichoSo where do you think we get our chips from [remember that chip shortage that led to fewer new autos for sale]? Taiwan. Which island nation is the last “outpost” before the deep water Pacific? If China gets past Taiwan, we’ll be seeing any subs they manage to create right off our West Coast or even in Alaska. Taiwan is actually of strategic importance to the US.

[@bernardochill2535]

Lol big words after running away from Vietnam

[@lunafringe10]

there will be another long march in China, when the communists will march into hell.

[@ameyasharma8525]

After Ukraine i don't think USA will not fought with China

[@siddhantroy9539]

Made in China pandemic 🤣🤣🤣🤣😍😍😍😍 I nearly choked A quote with perfection🔥

[@linusn6227]

“No battle plan survives contact with the enemy.”

[@chhunspl5640]

Fun fact: Chinese capture the Vietnamese islands in the south china sea so yeah I still remember that

[@gaboogablah]

Just because you have the largest army doesn't mean it's capable of doing anything, just look at Russia, the 2nd largest army and still hasn't defeated Ukraine.

[@ajaykumarjagadishdubey500]

She is great Reporter...and wts a courtesy to speak bravely.

[@SewolHoONCE]

Sounds like a story from Korean history. (Tell me if I fail to make an accurate statement.) The story I recall happened at a time when the Joseon Dynasty succession was contested. China sent a fleet to support one pretender. Japan sent a fleet to support the other pretender. The two fleets anchored in the harbor. The number of vessels sent by Japan outnumbered the vessels sent by China. ¿Japan advantage? No: a substantial percentage of the Japanese personnel were incapacitated with beri-beri. As Palki said, don’t count the quantity of the ships alone, count the quality also.

[@georgepantazis141]

Bullshit🇭🇲🇺🇲🇬🇧

[@spirit4452]

I think the biggest part we missed is that upwards of 90% chinese troops are unfit for military deployment and most of chinese force is forced enrollement and the difference in quality of troops was very clear during the galwan clash and China knows what happened.... it suffered casualties and major injuries in mid 3 digits while india suffered only 20 casualties and major injjuries.

[@danielbarath2649]

'Made in China pandemic', you can't help but love Palki!!!!

[@reynaldolimesak6732]

If Chinese navy so weak , why US and the gang not dare attack China occupied island and artificial island in SCS 😂😂😂

[@A_Haunted_Pancake]

Never disturb your enemy when he's making a mistake. China is putting a lot faith into being able to use those relatively small islands as a force-multiplier for its Air Force & Navy. However, it's highly debatable how long those islands would stay operational in a full-blown conflict with a / several major Power(s).

[@charles3dart683]

Yes but what about quality of the equipment. and China is having problem with powersupply.

[@huangpeter864]

China is a country with developed industry, not like hungry 3rd world india

[@charles3dart683]

@@huangpeter864If they are their semiconductorindustry failed,Everglade failed and they have huge problems with powersupply.And you call that well developed?

[@codfusilli5879]

China cannot defeat the Avengers, Justice League, Saitama, Gundam Force, King Kong and Godzilla! 🤣🤣🤣

[@maxthea9994]

you fool?what bout covid 19??hahahaha

[@codfusilli5879]

@@maxthea9994 Umbrella Corp. 🤣🤣🤣

[@jaslll4396]

Practicing attacking a carrier in the desert is not practical. Unless you are thinking of boarding and capturing the carrier. It makes more sense for them to practice launching planes off a flight deck in the desert.

[@nesseihtgnay9419]

china is un-experience in war while the US are the most experience

[@gastonbess9469]

What experience would you need remember sitting behind a 🖥 with orders to release deadly weapons at target's China is goin to sink fiew aircraft carriers and that is a hard 💊 Pillsbury America to swallow

[@MaverickMaratha]

What about India!?

[@ngkeam9491]

@@MaverickMaratha -rest at its roost!!

[@КириллПерваков-м4э]

us are most experts in losing wars

[@Jai_BharatMata]

Chinese superiority, militarily so, is a myth. China often worries about the lack of a battle-hardened army of soldiers that can put up a tough fight. And as per military discussions on the Chinese side itself, much of the PLA’s incapacity to indulge in heated armed conflicts, stems from the One-Child Policy of the Communist state which has turned out to be an unmitigated disaster for the country. In order to deal with their own mess, the PLA has been forced to resort to special training, in order to straighten up “spoiled” soldiers. As a matter of fact, the Chinese military is a non-disciplined and non-calculative force, as a result of which skirmishes initiated by overenthusiastic Chinese commanders along the LAC often end up embarrassing the top leadership in Beijing.

[@cariopuppetmaster]

This is a cope comment for an obvious reason

[@unknown-ze2nf]

Chinese army are good but they still lack experience in war

[@socramzetroc1535]

So what?! U.S. has been making wars up every 8 years and they still losing them

[@Green.P3]

@@socramzetroc1535 That means China results will be worse than US

[@dmatheson1342]

@@socramzetroc1535 everybody keeps using the word losing, if usa didn't have to worry about civilian casualty and world condemnation they would blow you off the map, so maybe mission objectives were not acheived but to say lost is BS, Wake up, when WW3 comes you will see what lost is

[@socramzetroc1535]

@@dmatheson1342 I'm a Mexican and I don't assume U.S. should take in in their profit war. They already started one also known as "drug wars". Those junkies from the North are still demanding drugs and bringing weapons at the South

[@fjinnw3019]

US have so much war experience, still lost every war. lol

[@yootoober2009]

YES!