Woman has NO concept of morality!

[@dr.zoidberg4313]

Men emphasize principles over people, while women emphasize people over principles. This has massive implications, especially in politics and religion.

[@gordonsrus]

Interesting point

[@nerychristian]

And usually they emphasize the wrong people. Women tend to defend criminals and deviants.

[@jackdeniston6150]

Look closer, they do not. They emphasize themselves.

[@AndrewFosterSheff69]

And is why God ordained the man to be the head of the household. And is ALSO why God warned that women would try to rule over the man.

[@kellygreenii]

At the extremes, neither is good. There has to be a balance. Emphasize principle too much over people you get cruelty and tyranny. Emphasize people too much over principles and you get chaos.

[@Jaco3688]

“We women are …” Moral chameleons.

[@KalaAltheaBalik]

It is solipsism or egocentrism.

[@GaryBentlage]

​@@KalaAltheaBalik yes I agree

[@GaryBentlage]

Facts!

[@SCOTT77100]

So are some men, They are horrible teachers. Ex: How do men expect women to be loyal and faithful when u see what men (not all men) have done to them (Past and Present).

[@big_petebear8535]

So are men. There was only one man without sin. If men do not follow God, women will try to take over man's role. When governments collapse (and they always do) women an men will return to their roles. If they don't, nature will end them.

[@orangeandslinky]

And the wife promised saying "So help me God." Here is what women say they believe. "A woman has the RIGHT to change her mind, about anything, at any time, for any reason, as many times as she wants to." Now I ask you, can you make a deal, or contractual agreement ,or a covenant with that? No.

[@latetotheparty184]

It used to be a quote even 60 years ago that women have a RIGHT to change their mind.

[@orangeandslinky]

@@latetotheparty184 That word "RIGHT" is a big deal. So they have a "RIGHT" to not mean word they said at any time or place, all of the time. Eve must have thought the same way. So what "tries" to protect a woman from herself? A strong male order. Well, what's that called? A Patriarchy.

[@AndrewFosterSheff69]

And is why we need to pull them back to the original contract, instead of continually negotiating and losing ground again and again (death by a thousand cuts). Good Boundaries (or Goodbyes) are the key. Get used to saying "no" and not budging - they will kick and scream, but that's what the garage is for and when they've calmed down - pick back up where you left off - they do not get to manipulate or derail you with their emotions!

[@orangeandslinky]

@@AndrewFosterSheff69 As soon as you try to pull them back, you will go to jail. We do not live in a Patriarchy now. It is gynocentric now. Female ruled, and the future is female.

[@unlimited971]

The very idea of right is yet again women avoid responsability." Oh but i have right so i do whatever". It s not because you can do something that you should. Women are children

[@vesasutinen5958]

Great video. You made an excellent argument, why women should not vote.

[@AndrewFosterSheff69]

It's why the West is in such a mess - their nurturing nature has opened the flood gates on fighting aged men being allowed to enter cos ... feelings. And cos the men raising the alarm to what is happening are now ridiculed, it is getting worse and worse. It's ironic that if what I fear transpires, those same women are going to end up being subjugated (and worse) by those very same savages THEY fought and shamed us to let in!

[@iamaronman]

As a regular dude it makes me feel gross to think we should take women's right to vote away, and the evidence keeps building on why that is a good option. It's an extremely sad state of affairs in America.

[@ellenroehl6022]

I specifically asked for a male therapist this time. It's so refreshing to be working on goals and strategies instead of just talking about feelings for an hour.

[@OfficialBROOM]

Moral relativism = Force, Court, Government, Slavery. Natural Law of Morality = Do not cause harm by any version of violence to another sentient being. = Freedom, No slavery.. Pure Gold 🔥☄🌠🤯🐈‍⬛

[@-Jakob-]

...but doesn't work with human nature, I'm afraid we'd need an AI for this.

[@OfficialBROOM]

@@-Jakob- It does work BUT the Dark Occult have instilled into the peoples minds the distortion. That makes human beings indoctrinated in the completely Wrong thinking.

[@jakubrogacz6829]

yeah right except earth is zero sim game so its impossible

[@coreym162]

@@-Jakob- It works depending on the circumstance. I said it. To deny things don't change given the circumstance is as bad as Communism. They are "1 size fits all" too.. The woman in the video gets it more than she's given credit for. To rest everything on "God's Lap" is it a wonder the world is so divided? Everyone is crying "I'm right, you're not". God alone isn't the answer to justice and law. Even our Constitution presents this. That is why "Liberty" is introduced. "Liberty" is not inalienable nor entitled by God but, enforced by Man.

[@AlecMajerison]

KZbin inserted many, many commercials into this episode. I hope they're paying you. They're certainly commercializing your content.

[@rezcellent]

They run ads on all long form media does not matter if you are monetized or not

[@user-su5uf5yv1w]

I'm literally going feral at this point.

[@city_of_coompton6832]

Going vibrantly diverse

[@williamwaits]

Could this be possible why women shouldn't vote and focus on the family?

[@FarfromEden]

Yes

[@NB-yu4lj]

@@tubian323if your morality is based on only emotions with no accountability and not sticking to principle and word…how can you be trusted as an adult in business and government?

[@markjohnston2675]

Allowing women into politics has been a complete disaster.

[@consciousgentile5141]

​@markjohnston2675 leave it to biden, Graham, Trudeau, and Zelensky, right?

[@city_of_coompton6832]

That and they're more easily manipulated by emotional arguments

[@FredTonelli]

Thank you, Erin! Pleasant dreams!

[@shiftedtwistie]

You are speaking facts. Keep up the great work. I wish society had more women like you.

[@mgrsdgfsdafsdgrsdgfsdg6980]

When I worked customer service (call center) I had many women (they all seemed to be older) say they loved talking to a man because we were more competent, faster, and didnt talk their ear off. I found that humorous as when I talked to customer service women, I noticed the same thing.

[@ggmiethe]

“Fail to prepare and prepare to fail.” Thank you for today’s content, FFE. I leaned heaps (we Aussies say “Heaps” like Americans say “a bunch”) Geoff from Fremantle, Western Australia 🇦🇺🙏

[@Allan_aka_RocKITEman]

We in the U.S. occasionally say _heaps_ as well.

[@Mike-zw7fq]

Hello Erin. I have been enjoying your work. My Student for this week laughed at me when I told him I was listening to you read Snow White. Haha! I can't think of anything mean to say today so I will remain on your mind. So I'll "Simply"say Thank you for your Work and Best Wishes from Montana! Chad.

[@THX5000]

I used to date a Christian girl who was raised very conservative and went to church every Sunday. She told me if she got pregnant with my child that she would just delete it and not tell anyone.

[@FEiSTYFEVER]

Sounds like watered down relativistic Protestantism to me, so not Christian.

[@SoloRenegade]

@@FEiSTYFEVER point is, religious women by and large are no different than nonreligious women. Even when religion dominated all aspects of life for thousands of years of human history, all religions had laws to control female behavior, and told numerous stories warning men about female behavior.

[@dracul1838]

Religion dont overwrite her nature,if you where a 6,6,6 chad/tyrone with money and status the hell will frezze before she will delete the child.

[@Neaptide184]

⁠@@SoloRenegadenonsense. Just nonsense. You equate one amoral statement from one woman as the baseline for all of Christianity. You were dating a liar, you enjoyed dating a liar, and you enjoyed being immoral. You got what you wanted, which was sex, you got what you wanted, which was no repercussions for irresponsible behavior. You justify your gratification by pointing out the woman was “Christian and went to church every Sunday.” Faith is not a job, showing up in a building for regularly scheduled meetings. Faith is obedience to The Word. The woman you were making the beast with two backs with and proclaiming she would have an abortion has serious issues with obedience and clarity of the morality that is dictated by The Word. Do Christians sin? Yep. Do Christians have the same issues in life as non believers? Yep. Does that mean all Christians believe this? Nope. Being “raised conservative” is a meaningless phrase by the way. Based on your comments, we have no idea what you consider “conservative,” which in today’s world is just a meaningless label hung on people to make a point in the identity politics game.

[@alphabogeyman7462]

She's a cultural Christian, a devout Christian will not even get pregnant for you in the first place.

[@thehowlingmisogynist9871]

Patriarchy does not oppress women - it oppresses men!

[@bingsterc7621]

Majority of today’s “women” LACK ACCOUNTABILITY. That's one of the many problems regarding today's “women”.

[@Chrono826]

Thank you for this video! Society is not ready for this conversation. Liked and commenting for the algorithm.

[@bryanjohnson7508]

Just watched your video I think it can be explained as emotionalize. Now split that in to 2 word's emotional lies. When you take everything through your emotions everything can be what you want it to be I feel like this I feel like that I feel like he didn't treat me right. I wasn't happy anymore. Relative to what, the day you were married. When women stop thinking with their emotions and use logic. They will have a better frame of reference to come from . Thank you for your video❤

[@Dragonstalon1001]

You can tell a lot of times when someone is a 'Moral Relativist' cause they always claim "There are Nuances" or "there's a lot of Grey areas", and they like to change the Definition of Words or use terms they do NOT know the meaning of.

[@jakubrogacz6829]

oh there is grey area, thats why people used to conduct trials, doesnt mean that there is no right and wrong however

[@coreym162]

@@jakubrogacz6829 Thank you! No one gets this. Glad to see you do :) Funny how the same people that thump the Bible thump a very grey document too. The Constitution. Are people thinking life is Black and White? hahahaha!! That's why they don't get the law and that it works if actually enforced!

[@jasonivy9705]

Kinda like Leslie Hedlan and her garbage Star Wars Disney plus show The Accolide, where there are now good Sith lords and bad Jedi and nobody with an ounce of morality is buying any of it because if you were in the situation where someone murdered your friends, you wouldn't act like it was fine because the person who killed them all is attractive with nice abs. This is how you ruin a show, a legacy, a fanbase of 40 years, and if it keeps up a country. Fucking immoral people will eventually destroy anything they touch.

[@joaquinmurrieta2406]

Thank you, it's refreshing to hear from a Logical Lady's channel.

[@TacticsTechniquesandProcedures]

That blanket is AWESOME! Moral relativism is a slippery slope to tyrannical government. You won't learn that in school.

[@jakubrogacz6829]

You will, unless you slept through Hitler and Stalin debacles. Or if you want just see modern Russia or Islamic terrorism. All examples of "It depends"

[@smiles7631]

Hello Erin! She got outgunned in that debate. I wonder if she knew what she was getting into. Did you notice she is clothed decently? That is shocking, from what I usually see on that channel. I like how you are trying to show us what you see happening. Everyone is being put into some category or box. I'm noticing that I fall into the category of an introvert. So I don't get out much into society. When I go to the store I try to interact with as many people as possible. For one I don't want to be lonely and never have a woman in my life again. Another is I want to help people in any way that I can. Sometimes people need to see and talk to a positive happy person. I think we need to lift up the people around us. Where is Lola? She didn't make an appearance today. Tell her she has an audience to attend to lol. Have a good weekend sweetheart!

[@jhb01]

Waaaaaaay out of her depth

[@hdcvo2570]

This girl is trying so hard to sound smart.

[@gkdaniels1]

I watched this debate live, and she was totally outclassed by Andrew Wilson.

[@Zarvale]

She’s a kid and he’s a grown ass man!? Are u also impressed when a man beats up a kid? 😂

[@cattywampusmcdoogle]

Andrew usually beats all he faces in debate... I have only seen him log out of one debate/argument, and that was against Tree. It was never a debate, just an attack and yelling from Tree, just like cops do in an interrogation room... she didn't let him answer much of anything, and then when she brought up Andrew being a cuck and simp for his wife having two kids by other men, Andrew left the "debate"

[@kellygreenii]

Morality is situational. The problem is when you have no solid principles or values to guide you through situations. Too many women’s only guiding principle is to avoid pain. Either having yo feel it themselves or to avoid having to cause others to feel it. Unfortunately, they wind up too often just excusing or enabling bad/unprincipled behavior. So we’re now in this absurd space where JUDGING someone’s bad behavior is considered worse than the bad behavior. 🙄 Which is all about avoid pain, responsibility and accountability: I do what I want…. Which is fine until you start demanding to be protected from the consequences of ignoring what’s right.

[@coreym162]

Thank you! Morality is situational. That guy basically saying "because, God said so" equivalent is dangerous on so many levels and is why the West is a mess now. He should have said "Do unto others". There is nothing more universal than that. I sense weak faith in him. A true believer knows God puts reason in his laws. Not just because, he says so. The Old Testament is not "Christianity" in my book. Jesus had reasons in his gospel. Only the "Red" is Christianity.

[@kellygreenii]

@@coreym162 The Old Testament isn’t Christianity. It’s Judaism. It’s The Torah. The New Testament…The Gospels…are what defines Christianity. God realized that we were incapable of strictly following the Laws laid out in The Old Testament. But God had such compassion for His Children that He forged a new Covenant. God came down to Earth. Lived a human life. Then sacrificed Himself to atone for our sins. All He asked in return was Faith, and to do our best to show others the same compassion He showed us. Treat others as you would want to be treated. In living that human life God gave us a model of how to live: Christ.

[@hdcvo2570]

Women give us no choice, but to walk away if we value our time in our energy.

[@desertcrab6331]

This is the end result of Situational Ethics that was introduced into our schools back in the 80's. I was there and confronted it hard, any sane person could see the purpose was to remove any form of an objective base to build a sturdy foundation of principles that govern your life. They are static and evolve slowly, they don't blow in the wind. I could not affect change in the school, so I affected change by removing my kids. You paid dearly in those days for even thinking such a thing, homeschooling was equivalent to today's racist. Whatever that means, fluid morals have left it bereft of any meaning at all. They cannot see that the mere attempt to understand is racist as well. They completed their schooling abroad, far away from the nut house and I will lay myself down in my grave in peace knowing my kids have what it takes to live in a real world.

[@johnwalsh518]

They don't want to hear and understand that is the problem.

[@Rick_Cleland]

I'm so alone right now, just hearing a rational voice helps.

[@Allan_aka_RocKITEman]

It ain't just you...🙏

[@josephjuno9555]

She will think and Tell everyone SHE WON That debate! She proved her point to him! They truly believe all this because she was taught this entire education!

[@smirkinatu5512]

There is a unicorn on your couch.

[@mafp22w]

God told us not to lie in the Ten Commandments. Abraham used moral relativism to justify deceiving Pharaoh about Sarah. It is wrong to lie, not because we can’t figure out reasons to justify lying, but because God said it was wrong. It is an absolute principle that I live by.

[@city_of_coompton6832]

It says "bear false witness against they neighbor" that doesn't cover all types of lies

[@coreym162]

Do unto others is all anyone needs to know. It's at the root of all of God's law. Modern Christians seem to have forgotten.

[@helmeteye]

One of my favorite phrases that I have been using recently is that the oath of woman is inscribed on water.

[@paulcolin9071]

🤔

[@jemmrich]

It's amazing you can use the "oppression" of people in another country, to fight for even more rights by co-opting their victimization as if it affects you directly. Ultimately gaining more and more privileges that the women who were used as your example remain unchanged and receive no benefits. It actually seems sick thinking of it that way. Like stepping on their heads to get ahead but never pulling them up behind you.

[@johnwalsh518]

They are afraid to come out and say what they really feel because they know they will be pulled to pieces.

[@lesbourgeois1829]

I'm Libertarian so your morals are yours not mine. As long as you do no harm and there is no victim, What you do is not anyone's business.

[@troydunn8463]

Hey, FFE. Good news: Channel 'Man React showed one of your shorts a month ago and it was just echoed by 'TheChowTimePod'. I am not subscribed to either, but it showed up in my feed and the thumbnail showed you. Your work is getting noticed.

[@seekingishwara737]

I love, love, love that you see the spectre of communism behind all this non-thinking "thinking," because you are absolutely right. I think the young lady can't hear the logical argument the guy is making because her mind is full of a single, reverberating thought: I am special, I am fresh and new...men like these are stale and tired, and their blabbing is just meant to get me down.

[@clintonwilson3863]

Looking forward to seeing you on the next one Cheers Clint Have a great day ✌️

[@FerddieFlores]

She is a mystery. How did she make it this far in life. Save your money fellas, don't waste your time either.

[@johnwalsh518]

That's why that Fireman called women Chaos Demons. When they destroyed the brotherhood in the Firefighters station. When two women were given jobs there.

[@keenvalkoor2473]

This is difficult to articulate for me, but I will try. The ideological framework one adheres to generally dictates a persons world view. I believe everyone was born with a conscience knowing the difference between right and wrong. On this premise regardless of ideology people still know if what they are doing is right or wrong. I find little to no excuse for people who knowingly doing something immoral. I believe people who knowingly do immoral acts without remorse have a case of self worship. Those with hubris only respond to the carrot and the stick, inscentives and disenscentives not to appeals of morality and/or reason. If the bible is true then this awareness of good and evil began in the garden of Eden. Each generation after was born with it. Try looking at these people under the premise that they already know what they are doing is wrong. Then count each attempt to play coy or deflect as a lie. People commit tons of sins just trying to deny they comitted one.

[@oopsdidItypethatoutloud]

People like that woman, misunderstand all the time, from ignorance more than any ill will, I believe. If we need a point/scripture to turn to as a point of justifying our moral guidance. Some turn to the bible. Other's turn to themselves, or their group etc, which means they believe they are so wise and all knowing that they can decide what stands high on the moral and just tree. All they are doing is saying We are so wise, we are God. And as we all know, their decision on what's at the top of that tree, changes day to day. If they believe in God or not, the Bible was written over millennia and shouldn't be tossed away or ignored, simply because they don't believe in God. It is our moral guid book. ❤ from Northeast England ❤️

[@stephanfouche9208]

It is even more fundamental than that. If evething is just a random collection of matter and energy then how could the idea of morality even come about. In nature there is no right or wrong, events simply are events.

[@oopsdidItypethatoutloud]

@@stephanfouche9208 Aye, nihilism is a dead end

[@avlifesavers]

Narcissist is never going to admit they are wrong. I've had several of both genders in my life, but they act the same.

[@yogimarkmac]

It is ignorant to conflate atheism and communism. There is no reason theistic communism can't exist.

[@corystarkiller]

Why would arguing philosophy with randoms, ever be expecting any results? Just because she can't answer the ethical basis question, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. And there's no "proofs" for God. There's been 1 argument for the existence of a god(not even the Christian God), that's been shown to be logically consistent. That doesn't mean that it's true, only that it's not contradictory. Neither person is actually equipped for that debate. She hasn't ever thought about this enough, and he's only arguing against her arguments, not actually proving his side. This is why debates are pointless. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YT hides my replies. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- @chrisknight880 She's an OF model. She's using the debate as an advertisement for her OF. That's the only reason they keep going back on those podcasts, because it gets them new subs. She's not actually there, to prove her morality. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- @stephanfouche9208 It was absolutely about the existence of god(which he dodged, instead of arguing), and it only became about moral relativism, because asking an OF model to be educated enough about biology, psychology, and philosophy is a Herculean feat. He forced it down that path, because he wasn't debating in good faith, against someone who had no reason to be debating in the first place. Most ethical systems have nothing to do with moral relativism, and don't rely on the existence of a god to work. Even the systems that aren't true. He made her look dumb, because 99.99% of people aren't able to have that debate, and his entire argument style would have collapsed against someone who could answer why non-religious ethics aren't relativism. As he was guiding the debate towards moral relativism, because that's what he wanted to argue against, because that's really easy. It's the exact same thing that all the red pill podcasts talk about, when they talk about women's right to vote. Only from a different angle. It's also the exact same thing that all the preachers do, by defining what the other person's argument is, and then arguing against that, instead of actually debating. It's very rare that I'll see a religious person, have any sort of formal debate that involves their religion, actually have in on actual philosophical grounds. They know that a debate isn't about proving your side, but about making the other person be wrong. So you win by default, which is what he was doing. That being said, 99.9% of religious people aren't like this to begin with, so it's generally not a problem. Most people aren't like that. It's just a trait of debaters in general, where they've learned the meta, of make the other person wrong, so you win.

[@chrisknight880]

As a Christian I'm going to agree with his argument being pointless. Although why she can't come up with anything I don't know.

[@corystarkiller]

@@chrisknight880 She's an OF model. She's using the debate as an advertisement for her OF. That's the only reason they keep going back on those podcasts, because it gets them new subs. She's not actually there, to prove her morality.

[@stephanfouche9208]

The discussion wasn't about the existence of God. It was about the fact that moral relativism essentially boils down to who can enforce their idea of morality on the other.

[@corystarkiller]

@@stephanfouche9208 It was absolutely about the existence of god(which he dodged, instead of arguing), and it only became about moral relativism, because asking an OF model to be educated enough about biology, psychology, and philosophy is a Herculean feat. He forced it down that path, because he wasn't debating in good faith, against someone who had no reason to be debating in the first place. Most ethical systems have nothing to do with moral relativism, and don't rely on the existence of a god to work. Even the systems that aren't true. He made her look dumb, because 99.99% of people aren't able to have that debate, and his entire argument style would have collapsed against someone who could answer why non-religious ethics aren't relativism. As he was guiding the debate towards moral relativism, because that's what he wanted to argue against, because that's really easy. It's the exact same thing that all the red pill podcasts talk about, when they talk about women's right to vote. Only from a different angle. It's also the exact same thing that all the preachers do, by defining what the other person's argument is, and then arguing against that, instead of actually debating. It's very rare that I'll see a religious person, have any sort of formal debate that involves their religion, actually have in on actual philosophical grounds. They know that a debate isn't about proving your side, but about making the other person be wrong. So you win by default, which is what he was doing. That being said, 99.9% of religious people aren't like this to begin with, so it's generally not a problem. Most people aren't like that. It's just a trait of debaters in general, where they've learned the meta, of make the other person wrong, so you win.

[@corystarkiller]

@@stephanfouche9208 I had to edit my first post, with your reply, you know how this site is.

[@johnwalsh518]

Just recently I was shopping with my wife and I got a shock! Every store we went into there was a tiny area with men's clothes and more than three quarters of the stores are with mostly women and children's clothes, I was shocked. It seems men are not important anymore so it's time we all leave the west altogether.

[@jimhendricks88]

Congrats on 10K subs! I appreciate that you said, "In sickness AS in health." (at 20:14)

[@Nobleheart111]

“Depends on the situation” might be true sometimes, but it is also a great way of dodging accountability in questions. If you can’t be pinned down on answers, you don’t have to defend your position or beliefs.

[@vl4394]

Yeah, as a man you'll never outcompete women on their terrain. Maybe temporarily, but what you have to simulate she does natively. So you'll get distracted and go back to doing things that matter, meanwhile her unconscious is subtly maneuvering and scheming, and when you go back to it you'll find she's just reconstructed her psychosocial advantage again. Lot of I I I I I I I I, you you you you you you you. Dismantle it or leave, cycle repeats. Fun fact, this dynamic is built into screen dimensions. The most common aspect ratio for screens is 16:9. You = 25 + 15 + 21, ie (2+5) + (1+5) + (2+1) = 16. I is just the 9th letter. 1920x1080p eg is a ratio of 16:9. Or a ratio of You:I. The moon's average radius at its equator is 1080 miles. 1080 is thus a moon number. 2160 is the diameter, drop the 0, 216. The 6th cube number. 6x6x6. Moon dominance is built in. The world is very clever.

[@markymarknj]

You know, in order to design or build anything, the first necessary prerequisite is to have a measuring system; there must be an agreed upon system of measurement. Imagine trying to build a house if we didn't agree what an inch, a foot, a pound, or a gallon was? It would be chaotic, right? Even on logical grounds, moral relativism fails to pass scrutiny.

[@Holy_Moley]

Christian ethic does reduce to force; but God is the force. So fear of God becomes the force, which enables individuals to rule their own lives, based on the knowledge that if you do the wrong thing, then God may wipe you off the face of the map without any warning, but also that you may end up in eternal punishment. Better than relativism, which denies that there is any punishment for doing the wrong thing.

[@nosotrosloslobosestamosreg4115]

Nothing Bible or any other Ancient Scripture did not warn us out.

[@basildeharte1893]

TOO MANY THINK THAT HAVING NO POINT OF REFERENCE (FLUIDITY) IS A POINT OF REFERENCE. THIS IS THE KIND OF THINKING THAT GIVES RISE TO THE CONSTANT MAKING OF NEW LAWS. Isaiah 5:20 “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” King James Version (KJV) 😎

[@alanmerrick2841]

Oppression to women is that they are naturally responsible to biology/God, children, and men. They now possess the “final solution” for children, but there is still more work to be done with biology/God, and men. Moral relativism is founded on autonomy, and doing whatever the heart desires, requires no opposition.

[@allenhammer7923]

I call it situational morality

[@fishguru73]

They know the truth. They just don't care about the truth because it doesn't cater to their whims so they subscribe to another line of reasoning to justify themselves.

[@Jensbangmikkelsen]

People who continuously refuse to take responsibility while at the same time come across as very arrogant, in lack of morality and ignorant can really be a huge energy drain to me mentally. The girl in the interview in addition does not at all seem to get that the concept of relativism cannot be used for every single type of mortality in life. Her lack of a true framework and sense of the existence of things that can never be relative is emmense. It is such a dangerous road to follow as a human being because it makes a person constantly searching for a way to escape responsibility whenever possible. It is like constantly trying to manipulate any situation to justify him or her always being right. That way of thinking is so dysfunctional and naive and fake and incredibly immature. These aspects of (primarily) social media- induced ignorant behaviour clearly are a big part of how and why our moden world has got so chaotic and fragmented and full of contradictions. I just can't

[@rayvelwaters]

Wow good break down I was wondering about women’s morals

[@mafp22w]

Are men naturally more principled than women? Is this why Satan appealed to Eve and not Adam? Is it a husband’s responsibility to protect a woman from this weakness in women? I’d love to hear what you’ll think.

[@Zarvale]

Not sure what is so impressive about a grown man debating a young woman?

[@NB-yu4lj]

Why are you assuming you should be impressed?

[@Zarvale]

The lady doing the video seems super impressed as do many in the comments. He should have a debate with someone more in his weight class is all im saying.

[@MichaelSaville-d9f]

Don't forget, you also have to define what "greater", or "minimize" mean too ... not just "good" or "harm". Relativism means defining nothing. You may as well cease using language, since NO WORD has any consistent meaning

[@tdrive398]

Andrew recognizes that he's fighting an unarmed opponent. She's obviously not used to anyone ever questioning/requiring her to justify her opinions/actions. Her CPU short-circuited.

[@khankrum1]

Oddly enough there is a very apt story in The Old Testament. Herod granted anything to Salomy to dance salaciously for him. hat she demanded in return cost Herod everything including his soul! The moral is that some things come at far too high a price.

[@dennisjones0081]

Baby girl you are looking good!!!!!!

[@Uncle_Neil]

Thing is, totally agree with you AND what is going on between her ears is also greatness as well. A very rare person these days.

[@helmeteye]

It's always amazing to me that people don't understand where their own morality comes from. Nietzsche's Genealogy of Morals is an awesome book. Even better is Thus Spake Zarathustra.

[@e_squared604]

You are one heck of a woman. Such wisdom, self awareness and intellectual honesty.

[@e_squared604]

Very. I don't expect to ever meet a woman like her, and if I do, she probably won't be hot.

[@jonb5555]

His argument is actually circular and isn’t really an argument. So, I think they both have no clue about the skills necessary to have this discussion.

[@markjohnston2675]

Quotes by Voltaire....Many are destined to reason wrongly; others, not to reason at all; and others, to persecute those who do reason....If you want to know who controls you, look at who you are not allowed to criticize....The more often a stupidity is repeated, the more it gets the appearance of wisdom....Prejudices are what fools use for reason.....It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere....Opinion has caused more trouble on this little earth than plagues or earthquakes....Straight, Christen Men do not control anything.

[@coreym162]

Thank you! There is no morality without reason.

[@teaadvice4996]

But girls are pretty

[@jeremycole3008]

Dughhhhh

[@nerychristian]

Some are. Most are average to ugly looking. But since most wear makeup, we'll never really know

[@CR055FIRE]

these girls are victims this shows that everyone she has ever known has lied to her up to this point

[@nomaam-br549]

Most women lack a strong moral center, which gives them the flexibility and convenience of going with whatever will benefit them the most at any given time.

[@reaperput]

The funny part is that watching this "debate", I thought several times: "this girl is much more intelligent and articulate than average" 🤣

[@jamesd1505]

Woman n bonds? WOMAN DONT HONOR BONDS 😵🤭

[@TaylorWalston]

THis is a problem with how the question is posed. The underlying question is... is this true or false, mythology or reality. If your answer is mythology, saying it underlies things is not a fact. Do you understand, your OBJECTIVE morality, your reason to say right or wrong is fiction. And you will not accept other answers unless they offer .. fiction?

[@piobmhor8529]

Justice = fairness in the eyes of the law. Everyone is equal legally, regardless of station in life. Everyone has recourse to the law. Really not that hard to explain…not “well, you know it’s all like, relative”. Equality of opportunity not equality of outcome.

[@Fuxy22]

I disagree with him with one thing, religion is a terrible moral compass. Morality is much deeper than just what the bible tells us. Morality is an application of fairness and balance in benefit and cost. It is morally wrong to take advantage of someone even if you technically could. As humans we have an internal compass of fairness and if we notice we are taken advantage of we will get upset. It is immoral to destroy something for future generations just to squeeze a little bit more of it now, etc. not to mention it's just plain stupid to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs just because it's made out of gold.

[@nevadaalpacas9362]

when they're young and pretty they get a lot of attention so think they are smart, intelligent, wise

[@somebodyelse3004]

That is a very primitive view on things. First to base your personal morality on a fairytale ( religion ) is even worse then simply to base it on your personal opinion. In the later case at least you have thought about it. She is not good at arguing, but to base your morality on minimizing harm is exactly right. If you combine this with realism you get a solid moral framework. It takes into account that people are different, and it doesn’t let you get away with being crazy. So the question than becomes would my actions usually be harmful for others. Just to make that one point, if you are crazy ( suffering from mental illness ) your behavior will cause suffering to others. So it’s your moral obligation to work on that an seek professional help. And this is just one example of a moral rule that follows directly from the idea that you should minimize harm.

[@FarfromEden]

Who defines “harm” This is partly why we have people who want to criminalize speech because it hurt someone’s feelings. Is that harm? It gets very murky Also- the “fairytale” produced the best & safest society for most than any other in history. Even non Christian’s are coming to realize that society works better when we operate from that framework.

[@somebodyelse3004]

@@FarfromEden Harm equals suffering, but you have to be practical and rational about it. I think there are good reasons to exclude “He said something mean to me” from the “that is evil” list. First it is far too easy to lie about emotional pain, and use it as a weapon. This is where these “I am offended” claims come from. Second, if you are mentally healthy and mature, there is nothing someone can say to you that will seriously harm you. “Sticks and stones may brake my bones, but words will never harm me” That is simply not true. That is a very common error in the world view of conservatives. As I said, people are different. Conservatives tend to think that there is just one right way to live your life if you want to be happy, and they completely ignore that not everyone is like them. I would be very unhappy with a traditional life, and that is also true for most people that i know.

[@chrisstubbs2851]

Ideological concepts can easily be picked apart by asking simple questions. Regular debaters will home in on the first thing you don't have a definition for, then if you lose ground one that one point, the rest of your argument looks shaky. Never debate with a professional, you won't win.

[@-Jakob-]

Andrew's main point seems to be that some religion's assumed "absolute morality" would be above "relative morality". Human morality has always been relative as it's subjective perception for the most part. Just have some look into cultures and history. Inventing a virtual being like "god" as a beholder of "absolute morality" is just an attempt to cut corners, nothing else. We went through this as religions and justice was one. Didn't work out. In some regions of our world people still do it that way. We should know better in 2024.

[@user-hp2sr2ug3e]

What's good? Whatever makes me happy right now! Duh. ;) 17:37 As far as my mom and sister are concerned, they know how the world should be and anything other than that, they just can't process.

[@LiberPater777]

Sigh... Let's try edit number 1 Here's one of the problems with the religion vs moral relativism argument (let's stick to Christianity on this): The Bible dictates that thou shall not 'intentionally _bubble_ some one' (I hope through context you can figure out what that means). It's clear cut, and gives no exceptions. But, here's a hypothetical for you that's not too far off from reality: Let's say you live in a heavily 'less than conservative' area with a revolving door policy on 'certain kinds of activities'. And, you or someone you know had a 'less than pleasant encounter' with a person who's heavily 'less than pleasant', highly 'less than calm and collected', has 'upset' numerous people in the past, and let's even go so far as to say they've even 'liked' 'very young humans' too. Also, after doing some research, you know they've been 'unwillingly housed' numerous times, but they never get 'held' for long. They also know this and revel in it, and have no intention of stopping their 'less than pleasant' behavior, because they're having too much fun 'doing' it. And, left unto their own devices, will most definitely commit increasingly 'less than pleasant' acts. So... With this knowledge in hand, along with the address of the place they reside that someone gave to you, do you: A. Stick to the moral principles of your religion that say: 'absolutely no intentional bubbling of other people', and let them continue doing what they're doing? Or... B. Understanding that the problem won't be delt with by so called 'officials', go and take matters into your own hands?

[@user-su5uf5yv1w]

I'm miserable alone.

[@city_of_coompton6832]

"Good" -Jocko Wilink

[@nelsonmcgee3545]

What she learns in school, whether high school or college won't help her in life. We need relevant life skills taught to our children or they are going to fail very bad. Forget about getting evicted they won't even survive on the street even a feral dog or cat will have a better chance than a young even by todays standards.

[@user-su5uf5yv1w]

I'm eating peanut's out of a jar.

[@oopsdidItypethatoutloud]

Damn... I wish I thought of putting them in a jar... 😢 but I didn't ❤ from Northeast England ❤️

[@Allan_aka_RocKITEman]

@FarfromEden >>> Great video...👍

[@YelloRangr1337]

“That’s just like…. Your opponent man” is what they operate in. If I steal from you well that’s just, like your opinion man.

[@ShaunHensley]

A case could be made that this is EXACTLY what the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil is. 18:58

[@billstarr9396]

Hi Erin! This girl is ill prepared because her college professor left her, and her class, I'll prepared. All she is doing is regurgitating what her gender studies professor said during a lecture. I am Christian and try to live my life under Christian morality. But I wish, in these debates, people would cease bringing up Christianity. Because of their brainwashing, when a social justice warrior hears the word Christian they literally cannot continue until they destroy Christian. Other phrases and words can be used that have the same meaning, but stay away from anything religious, it's an insurmountable stumbling block! The women's liberation movement of the 1960s, like every other 1960s movements, have been absconded and morphed into a tool to divide society. You brought up Communism Erin, so.... The radical Left wants to turn the western world into a communist world. To achieve this they must create chaos to divide society to the brink of a civil war. In order to trigger that the economy must be collapsed. Does any of this sound familiar in 2024?

[@FarfromEden]

Exactly 🎯

[@Rafael-rn6hn]

Theism does not solve the problem of "relativism". Putting aside whether the Chistian doctrine is true or not, free will is enshrined in its tenets: it allows humans to not follow its morality. The "oughts" of religion come down to incentives in the form of post-mortem punishments and rewards. It's worth noting that what the moral code even _is_ has and continues to change according to whatever humans in that moment interpret them to be. Regardless of whether such an "absolute" moral standard exists or not, clearly humans do not fully understand it--and possibly never will--with several competing interpretations, not just inter-religions but within the same religion as well. In practice, humans make moral judgements and choose which set of principles to follow. Some groups assert that their moral standard is "absolute" or superior to others and ultimately have to enforce it over others. Adding or removing religion to the equation does not change the situation.

[@jamesriser5305]

A moral compass is needed in life. Religion provides such a compass. Your Grimm Brothers tales provide such a compass. There is inherent right and wrong and this is not based upon mere feelings. The gal in this episode seems rather "shallow" in her thought processes.

[@modestmouse2889]

I will marry you right now FOR REAL simply because you KNOW about moral relativism.

[@coreym162]

He's just saying "..because, God said so.." argument. You can have a secular sense of Justice and no, "harm" is not as relative as this guy would lead people to think. Justice is based on a simple principal that can be found in Christianity but, translates perfectly in a secular world. "Do unto others...". I was disappointed when I didn't hear him say that. That is literally the basis of God's law.

[@zhv3062]

So you believe in it but dont have an answer when questioned "Why you believe in it" - how does one continue down that path of belief when they cant even explain the Why, not even 1 single point other than "It feels good". Also think he should dumb down his words, the new kids coming out of college only know the Wokeie buzz words, thats the breath of their vocabulary. I felt like half the words he used went over her heard thats why it was blank stares all around.

[@coreym162]

There is no morality without reason. Neither presenters have it...

[@jeremycole3008]

@@coreym162 The whatever podcast is on par with the Jerry Springer & Steve Wikos shows

[@veritasliberabitvos454]

Christians keep missing the core tenet of marriage - it is a bi-directional covenant. Both parties make a promise before witnesses. It has terms and conditions. If either party breaks those terms and conditions the covenant is broken - the other party is entitled to the damages. And they are free from the covenant. That is why you become free of the promise you give as the promise is conditional - remember bi-directional. Only God is able to make uni-directional covenants.

[@Mojo-Jojo-O]

You have a nice smile 👍

[@mafp22w]

If the woman in the whatever podcast submits to Christ, she could be a wonderful wife. Unlike others on whatever, she does seem to listen and ponder the points. I hope for her future. She is intelligent.