Woman Sold a Car She Didn’t Own | Part 3

[@MrAllan9]

The scammer calling the buyer a scammer, too funny.

[@drenorris6980]

This mother is ruthless. Typical single mother. That's the example she sets for her son.

[@traceyjackson4470]

She “scammed” herself into now paying $2500.00 on a car that STILL LEGALLY does not belong to her or her son! HAPPY DRIVING FOLKS😝🤪

[@MrAllan9]

@@drenorris6980 She is raising a good liar.

[@mexicanspec]

@@traceyjackson4470 I bet the car will be up for sale the second she has it in her possession again.

[@bhornannawindeedeigh5007]

Too disgusting.

[@soula912]

The audacity calling him a scammer when she is selling a car that isn’t hers.. 🙄

[@Mz_O]

She bought it on sales 😂😂

[@tommytwotoes3880]

He is correct about the cost of the engine. One of the biggest mistake people make is expecting everyone to behave the way you think they should.

[@davek1943]

exactly - sad but we now have to live our lives expecting people to cheat & lie in every transaction.

[@lunacielo7680]

Yup, you gotta lower your expectations!

[@DawnRoache-y9n]

Exactly if people did everything right and by the book, it wouldn't NEVER be a need a for Judge Judy show!

[@Millie-uf9pn]

You're right

[@pikestance4219]

@@davek1943 No title, no money. I personally wouldn't do it any other way. It is good to assume good intentions, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't exercise due diligence.

[@petalsjones]

Good ruling, however the real scammers are getting a totally rebuilt vehicle and will now ride around like they have been for the last few years. So the crooks come out on top! SMH

[@QAsession]

I was thinking the same thing, that's why I commented that the plaintiff might mess with the car before returning it.

[@marissapearson1441]

@@QAsession As he should that’s smart.

[@DaGreat52]

If I was him. I'm doing something to that car before I give it back lol 🤷

[@melissaskitchen8832]

Yeah, but they’re paying $2,500 too

[@lolabrown7264]

@@QAsession she said drive it there yes but she didn't say in the condition he put it lol 😂 I agree and as well as he should mess with it.

[@mekhahboohunter5694]

He should remove parts and return the car

[@brt5273]

EXACTLY!

[@AnDrea-bo3iw]

He can’t, the stipulation in order for him to get the $2500 is that he drive the car to the defendant

[@MommyLion]

@@AnDrea-bo3iw He has to drive it there...that's the only stipulation given. What's defendant going to do if it comesback with the back seat missing?

[@camarojai6832]

He can drive it back and that sucker stop running the next day 😂😂😂 y’all remember those old school mechanics that rig stuff with a rubber band and bubble gum 😂😂

[@keianoire6631]

@@camarojai6832 😂😂😂

[@VictorPrescodvnp]

Both parties appear to be quite daft. As Judge Judy rightly said, it's absolutely ridiculous for Plaintiff to spend money on the car BEFORE receiving a Title to the car, and it is equally ridiculous for Defendant to sell a car that she didn't have a Title to, and then expect the Plaintiff to do the work to get the joint owner's ex-wife to sign over her share of the car.

[@Mamabear_of2]

Oh yes! Judy is so right! They were both wrong! Morons both of them!

[@Feed-My-Mind-Not-My-Ego]

Thank you. I learned a new word today.

[@ItsPalm]

Plaintiff just couldn’t get that thru his head.

[@VictorPrescodvnp]

@@Feed-My-Mind-Not-My-Ego 😄

[@Just_Wil]

@@Feed-My-Mind-Not-My-Ego Right! Me too. I googled daft so quick. Lol

[@jid381]

3:50 A scammer? Does she know the meaning of that word? She just sold a car she didn't own, and called the person who sued her for it a scammer? That's not how it works. Legal justice is not a scam. The guy was a buyer, not a scammer, even if he wasn't too bright. He's NOT a scammer. The defendant was a scammer.

[@amberearheart3326]

I basically live for JJ telling people, ‘listen to me, I don’t care’ get me every single time

[@gc6432]

same here!!!! and i use it every time!!!

[@JloveLamar]

That drives me NUTS!

[@ikaikamaleko8370]

Lol

[@missbradicah]

"He's a scammer", said the number one scammer! Lol!

[@RoughJustice2k18]

The defendant is truly a scammer, the plaintiff might be a bit of a hustler himself.

[@TaylorMMontgomery]

While the defendants have absolutely no business selling a car (they don't even know the basics) the plaintiff should have never bought the car. If he's been dealing in cars for 30 years he should KNOW that you don't hand any cash over until you can see that title with your own two eyes!

[@jules3048]

Exactly!

[@brt5273]

Truth! He's lacking integrity and his greed for profit got him into a mess.

[@202triciae]

Agreed you hand money over at exact time title is given to you...anyone with half a brain knows that. And 18...yea hes not too bright, question how did he get insurance without a valid registration in his name???... they are the scammers, make 500 and the car is off their hands, but neither of them could grasp the fact that a title to a car is A BIG IMPORTANT DEAL...

[@L.Spencer]

I think he's upset because Judge Judy is making him drive it back to their house, so what's he going to do if he didn't have it fixed? Tow it? And then how much is he going to get for it? He probably lost his $500.

[@Langley_Ackerman19]

@@brt5273 Agree

[@tiibbo]

She wanted to keep repeating that he threatened her. She is a despicable scammer with no shame.

[@RoughJustice2k18]

She needs a new hobby. Whining and scamming aren't working for her.

[@kallahari7542]

Karma will get her no worries.😈

[@mel924]

Who buys a car without a title?

[@gameboy4534]

Hey Mel u have any tips before getting a car - (age 20)-or to avoid bad situations like the case

[@willieadams3890]

People who are easily scammed

[@KC-or1ic]

My best advice - don't use craigslist.

[@SherriLyle80s]

@@gameboy4534 Have your mechanic (not the seller's, check out the vehicle before purchasing), don't pay with cash, pay with a check and write in memo what the payment is for, get title signed over, never drive it until it's registered with DMV and has insurance coverage.

[@unrulysinner635]

Clearly him

[@KC1up]

That lady at the end saying “he lied, he’s a scammer” is so devious. Trying to shift the blame onto him when she knew full well she scammed him. JJ should have given him all his money back.

[@L.W..]

Lollllllll “he’s a scammer” okay miss lady if that’s what helps you sleep at night 💀😂😂😂

[@MarvinForte]

Ironically, the entitled defendant didn't have the title.

[@QAsession]

Great play on words Marvin!! Touché

[@MarvinForte]

@@QAsession what can I say, it's my forté

[@QAsession]

@@MarvinForte You sir, are on a roll!! 😂 Edited spelling

[@MarvinForte]

@@QAsession 🤣🤣🤣

[@NewWesternFront]

very nice

[@adwallace021938]

The mother saying under her breath at 1:35 on part 2 "it's not against the law." Uhm...yes...yes it is, and she calls the plaintiff a scammer! 🤣 I bet when he returns the car to her, she will turn around and sell it again, and this time she will get a lot more money since it is now running! Hopefully that person actually calls the police, and she will end up in a criminal court instead of a civil court!

[@SuzyQVeganBeauty]

I was thinking that 😂

[@prall0915]

Yeah she gave herself away with that comment.

[@jid381]

Exactly what I said, in the previous video!

[@nb-user25]

If JJ had heard that she would have said “from where did you get your law degree?”

[@flakeycrustduster]

She still can't sell it. Title is in her cousin and his ex wife's name. All they can do is drive it til it breaks again.

[@j.t.7068]

That lady is despicable!

[@ryanheathwood-hopkins37]

*an absolute moron

[@dolam]

Yep. And she is teaching her son to be scammer also.

[@Help_me_understand]

Despicable scammer …. It’s like she actually believes what she’s saying 😮

[@Nthstar]

@J. T. look at the smirk on her face at the end Mole!

[@Kausten]

@@dolam JJ isnt much better.. She basicly let the scammers get away with it, and get a working car in the process.. Not saying the plaintiff was being a good guy or not, but he apparantly had proof that he spent that on the car, but JJ dident care.. Not reasonable to have scammers pay what he spent on the car?. Maybe not.. But they should not have scammed him in the first place.. But i guess Crime DOES pay.. heh

[@Nevaeh1]

he should've waited until the title was available to give her the money for the car

[@trekgirl65]

Which would have taken forever, since still did not have the title at court.

[@Nevaeh1]

@@trekgirl65 which means she would’ve never gotten the $500 and he wouldn’t have put money into the car that he can’t register

[@brt5273]

@@trekgirl65 That's why he shouldn't have bought it in the first place, or at least returned it and got back his $500 without putting anything else into it.

[@brt5273]

Wise lady

[@erickanew]

Yeah because there could've been a loan on the car. By getting the title that's the only way u would know it was legit. Lol anybody can give you a car they don't own & take your money

[@lissa19639]

I love it when JJ says, "I don't care" 😂

[@mmolokitladi5773]

And how she always turns back and says "your counter claim is dismissed"

[@byuvar]

like JJ said, why would he even buy without a title, let alone spending $3500. He is lucky to get even the $2500

[@osawagedk]

I would take apart most expensive parts just enough to drive it to their home and sell the rest of the pieces.

[@Pinkheartbwell]

I thought the same thing.

[@ezenwanyi3756]

fr

[@supervilla06]

Put the old parts back in and tow it to their place.

[@lyndi9719]

​@@supervilla06 Except JJ told him to DRIVE the car to the defendant's home.

[@QAsession]

Betcha he's going to mess up the car before returning it. That was a tough judgment.

[@harryrob8221]

He'll probably take out the parts he put into and then tow it back to them.

[@lordlossize]

@@harryrob8221 that would be the best ending

[@brt5273]

@@harryrob8221 He won't get the $$ judgement if it isn't drivable. That's why she specified that.

[@QAsession]

@@brt5273 if he's been doing his job for decades like he testified, then I am sure he knows how to get back tbe additional money he claims is due him. There's all sorts of ways.

[@travis8665]

@@brt5273 I wouldn't worry about the money. I would rather burn the car and tow it back to them scammers.

[@Nekulturny]

JJ just magically deciding the guy is padding the bill.. she even tried to argue with him about the price of the motor despite having the receipt and when confronted with the fact that shes incorrect, she just blows it off. This is what I don't like about Judy, she demands everyone else be accountable when they're wrong, she doesn't practice what she preaches.

[@intuitivetasha113]

Agrees

[@justmythoughtsjustmythough7202]

Exactly

[@Sundayschoolnetwork]

I agree 💯

[@jphickory522]

Correct. Her pride often leads her astray.

[@galegibbs5946]

I agree with the other pollster. The defendant should pay for the repair of the scratches. The plaintiff should remove his parts and the defendant pick up the vehicle immediately. That would have been fair Sometimes the judge gets caught in her emotions.

[@NOTHEOTHERGUY]

If defendants are getting the car back, plaintiff needs full restitution.

[@01denese]

JJ thinks he is fudging his receipts

[@jaymike3302]

No. The plaintiff is unreasonable and dumb.

[@margaretwade]

His own fault for putting money into a car HE DID NOT OWN! That's like you fixing your neighbors car without asking them and expecting them to pay for your work!!!

[@idharudhar5985]

JJ's judgement was awarding the defendants with a running car with work done on it worth 2,500 approx. ( as JJ awarded that to the plaintiff). They already got $500 from the plaintiff for the sale of the car. JJ said that the woman scammed the guy by selling a car that was not hers. So why did JJ give the scammer a car worth 2,500, felt like it was a reward for her scam. I think JJ should have asked the plaintiff to take out the new engine ( worth $1800 or whatever) and return the car with old engine to defendant . He is in the business of fixing cars so he can use it in the future or sell it. This way, the defendant would not be getting too much benefit from her scam. Plaintiff should have been awarded $500 he paid for the car and another say $600 for additional work and labor he put in that car. Any other loss he incurred, he would have to eat it for he started work on car before he got the title.

[@thale6945]

RIGHT!

[@dashopepper]

JJ doesn't understand the realities that working people face, which is why her ruling was as it was. The plaintiff found what he believed to be a really good deal on a non-working car whose body and frame were in good condition, and he knew that he could get it running again at a total cost to him of less than Blue Book value. Since used car dealerships sell cars at well above BBV, from his POV, he made the correct purchasing option.

[@margaretwade]

@@dashopepper He worked on a car HE DID NOT OWN! His fault!

[@daffodil852]

I don’t get why the defendant keeps saying he is the scammer. What did he gain from this? He fixed the car up, and doesn’t get to keep it. What exactly is his scam? He buys cars that don’t run for a few hundred dollars, fixes them with his own money, then loses them because he doesn’t have the title?

[@those_eyes]

The seller got a great deal!!! Sold non- running car for $500 and buys it back for $2500 and in running order!

[@karissakline6765]

And all paid for by the court too!

[@groowanderer]

I thought they stated the car was running when they sold it? I mean if not then jj really messed up here

[@karissakline6765]

@@groowanderer no it was not running, he had to tow it.

[@groowanderer]

@@karissakline6765 wow, JJ messed this up badly

[@shendisackett]

He got punished because he did the work before getting the title and after the week went by he was supposed to know he wouldn't be getting the title. I feel bad for him. I assume the mother calls him a scammer because he fixes up cars and sells them for a higher price than he paid as she started to say he goes round town buying up these cars and then JJ cut her off. What a horrible example that mother sets.

[@ghee6683]

"hE a SCamMeR" gurl bye

[@TheCassLife]

Right! 😳😆

[@cg9616]

Mother is ridiculous. Sold car no title tried to scam this man then blamed victim

[@Kelly-zy1vo]

Raw deal for the plaintiff. I'd strip everything back outta that car and give it back exactly the way I got it

[@mrs.reddics]

Amen! What you said!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@brandyhollingsworth6816]

If she is truly trying to “make him whole”, the defendants wouldn’t get a rebuilt car smh

[@BusArch42]

Never buy a car if they don’t have title. Never.

[@Brian-gh7fj]

I agree-it was kind of silly for him to put that much into a car he didn’t have physical custody of the title for BUT come in Judge, he should have recouped all his money not partial of it. In all actuality-the defendants really won in this situation. Since they don’t have to give the plaintiff any money (since shows pay for whatever restitution is ordered) They got to pocket his $500 down payment AND get the car back with $3,500 worth of improvements to turn around and sell it again!

[@davidjustice1848]

No way he's been trading cars 30 yrs and not ran into the old "ill get the title next week" trick.

[@keanancupido]

I really enjoyed watching this case! I love seeing how JJ handles such tricky people!

[@pinkfrance3405]

She OBVIOUSLY do not know what SCAMMER means.

[@damnnerves24]

Plaintiff is being stubborn and not acknowledging his stupidity by spending money on what he didn’t own.. He lucky JJ is fair and didn’t throw him out!

[@stlyelove417]

Exactly, he was pissing me off

[@MEGIDIOT]

Exactly, his entitlement was wild

[@WeezyJeffersonYo]

@@MEGIDIOT how was he entitled??? Stubborn yes, entitled, no.

[@An0niem4]

I think the plaintiff had a reasonable point in his assessment of the worth of the car and parts. It's his expertise and I believe him if he is saying his parts and the car are worth a certain amount. It was unfair of JJ to conjure up different numbers without asking another expert. If he should have put any money at all into this car, well, that's another story entirely

[@stlyelove417]

@@An0niem4 he did have a point, but say he put 10k into the car, speakers, sound system tires ect, and knowing he don't have the title, like why would you start putting in money into a car before getting the title, so I sold you the car but now I owe you 10k hell no, so I understand his point but the plaintiff should have use his brain

[@TrustNRuss]

It’s true what the judge is saying. 30 years of car dealing should’ve told him not to invest the money until the title is cleared.

[@justinowen9526]

I'm so happy JJ dealt with this lying scammer the way she did. She's a real piece of work.

[@makamurphy]

Omg do they NOT understand the Judgement? Unbelievable some people... always gotta argue their dumb points

[@tfernandez6806]

I think he never put any money into it, it still doesn’t run …that’s why he was freaking out when JJ told him he’d get the money AFTER he drove it to her house. She’s so cagey and brilliant….I wonder what happened after this haha

[@trekgirl65]

@@tfernandez6806 Uh he had bills showing the work done on the car to make it run. But he was crazy to buy the car with no clear title.

[@mamathemeat]

Either way he’s a dummy lol

[@antonjoseph789]

@@trekgirl65 exactly. JJ should have looked at the bills and not ignore his evidence. She is a real b!@tch sometimes.

[@georginaflemmings5074]

The defendant’s son is smirking cause they get a upgraded car after scamming someone 😡 but the plaintiff putting in more money before getting the Title😳 Shalom✌️and Agape 💕

[@brt5273]

Well the plaintiff could have taken the parts back off the car and resold the parts car and then just sue them for the initial $500. Then he would be clear and they not be gaining anything. Of course if he had just waited to have clear title before doing anything he would just have to worry about getting that $500 back without any other aggravation.

[@LV2UXO77]

Judge Judy is correct, people need to use common sense, and many don't. Never take their word, for there are too many scammers.

[@napoleon32]

Dude was lucky he got a dime more than the $500 he paid for it. He had a responsibility to mitigate his damages and didn't do so. It doesn't excuse the defendants scamming him, which is probably why JJ awarded him $2000 more.

[@trekgirl65]

He showed the bill for the engine, so there.

[@harryrob8221]

@@trekgirl65 That's not the point though. He should have waited until he had the title before investing anymore cash in the car.

[@brt5273]

I would have said pull off the parts he put on and keep them, he gets his $500 back from the defendants and they can pay to tow their non-running car back home.

[@clarkent61]

Rubbish, the buyer’s only responsibility was to meet the asking price for the sale, which he did. He may have made some poor choices but he did not break any laws. As far as he was concerned the title was on it’s way. JJ messed this one up big time.

[@DrWackySanchez]

@@clarkent61 I disagree, I'm on the ruling side of JJ on this one. He pretty much invested in property that wasn't his then expected someone else to pay for it Being a man who's been dealing with cars for "30 years" he should absolutely know better than to do something that silly. Whether he spent $40000 fixing the car or $400 is irrelevant the only thing that matters is that he didn't own the car, he knew he didn't own the car, but he spent money on it anyway

[@andrejamal5438]

The fact he is not understanding is beyond me!!! Lol

[@thatgirlPAIGE94]

Now those scammer defendants will sell the car for 4k after they hear how much is now worth 🤦🏾‍♀️ The scammers don’t deserve 💩

[@AccordingtoJexi]

Yea but they still don't have the title

[@brt5273]

He can always choose to take off the parts he put into it and tow it off his property. Then he can resell the parts car he claims he spent over $3000 for. The defendants or the actual title owner can deal with the abandoned nonrunning car. If he had waited to get the title before doing anything else, which is what a reasonable person would do, he could have returned the car, gotten back his initial $500 and wouldn't be out anything.

[@johnsmi213]

Or he can sell the car for $4000 and not honor the judgment. He only gets $2500 if he drives the car over and gives it to them but if he fails to do so, he doesn't get the $2500 in exchange for them not getting the car.

[@AccordingtoJexi]

@@johnsmi213 Except he technically doesn't own the car. Nobody will buy a car from him for $4,000 without a title.

[@johnsmi213]

@@AccordingtoJexi Oh, right. But that being said, someone bought a car from them without a title.

[@JamesPerk-h3n]

The plaintiff's a scammer? The defendant and her son sold a car that wasn't their's. I'd be threatening someone who scammed me.

[@PowerDiva]

I was on the plaintiff's side until he started getting irritated and trying to argue with JJ. What that says to me is that maybe he's trying to pull a little hustle too. He wanted all that money and was not willing to accept that he made a dumb mistake and will have to take a partial loss for that. She tried to explain this to him but he was not willing to hear it. Honestly he's lucky he got anything more than the $500 back. I think the only reason he did is because JJ was so pissed at the defendants for being obvious scammers.

[@brt5273]

EXACTLY!

[@jazmynfranco6538]

I don’t think the defendants were 100% scammers I think they really thought that maybe the plaintiff could resolve the tittle issue.

[@matmagix3845]

@@jazmynfranco6538 I think the same, though they didn't really take into account the responsibility should lie with them first and foremost.

[@tomy4453]

@@jazmynfranco6538 Nope, they are 100% scammers for selling something they do not own. They even said they will produce the title in a week so you reason that they think he will resolve it is ridiculous. Lmao

[@anonymousanonymous2577]

@@jazmynfranco6538 I believe they are 100% scammers they knew they didn't have the title for the car but yet and still they put the car on Craigslist for the car to be sold then they lied to this man about the title and they knew they couldn't get the title because the cousin's ex-wife has the title

[@ricknantelle1011]

Any reasonably prudent person would absolutely not repair a car they're buying, until they have clear title in hand. It appeared that wasn't resonating with the plaintiff.

[@oryanmackie-smith2423]

Just wondering if anyone else is thinking this as well......... Why didn't JJ just order the title to be transferred to him... give the defendants say a week to have that organised, he keeps the car and gets his title like he should have done originally?? If the defendants cannot or do not produce the title as ordered, then award him the blue book value $3225 and he returns the vehicle to them.. ??

[@ladymacan7874]

Because the defendants admitted that they couldn’t get both of the legal owners to sign over the title. Their cousin’s ex wife is incommunicado.

[@brt5273]

Because that $3225 is actually coming out of her show's pocket. That would mean that she would be paying him $3200 for being stupid and putting that work into a car before he had the title in his name, and the actual title owner would end up with the now running car because they were never party to this deal. If he had waited like he should have he would just be dealing with recouping his $500 and that would be that.

[@-JG-339]

She can't order the title transfer since none of the party present owns the car. She can't force the owner (which is not them) to agree to their deal. She could give them time to get the title as you say. But they them self said they can't, and didn't managed for months. So no point to believe that a week will help

[@Richie8a8y]

I love us Judge Judy fans. We know what’s right and love seeing it happen. This is a channel where the comments are as satisfying as the videos. See you next time.

[@SlicerVorzakh]

A rebuilt 2007 Sonata with a new engine would definitely be worth $3000+ in 2022

[@MegaAsia8]

Whats crazy is, he came in there with all his reciepts like damn give him his money back its not like he came in there just saying he paid all this money!

[@jaesi8081]

LOL she called him a scammer hahahaha

[@braddelisle6902]

Wow that sucks. Essentially judge Judy just gave the scammers a driveable car for $2000. He's out $500. Gone. Put bare minimum $1800 plus HIS LABOR FOR FREE!!! The scammers get a driveable car for $2000 and driven to their house. Judge Judy is outta her damn mind!!!!

[@0LadyV0]

The Judge is wrong in this case. Her own blue book is above what she is giving him. She said he shouldn't have expected these people to pay for it. Well he didn't. He expected a title to the car he bought.

[@aprilross0111]

This where i dont like JJ she dosent listen , dosent let people talk , cuts them off. If she did one google search she would see this engines have big problems. And maybe he should have waited for a title. But if she making him return the car because he cant get a title then the. Defendant should pay the full price of what he had into the car! He's not trying to charge for labour he's trying to charge for the parts. So the Defender gets a new running car for $2,500. And the plaintiff is out his time and money because these people knew he would never going to get title. 🤦. Now they will be driving that car for couple years. Thanks JJ for helping use with the scram.

[@jacobalberts2506]

People are just not willing to listen to reason, the only thing in their mind is what they want to say while meanwhile JJ is putting down their whole argument.

[@Mary-pg3lu]

JJ is going to put this in order, for sure she will...

[@the.magic.catbus9459]

They shouldn’t have sold it to him, he shouldn’t have invested money until he got the title. He’s lucky he’s getting any money.

[@smiley9057]

People like the defendant make it hard for other people. The nerve of her to call him a scammer as if she isnt one herself lol

[@RR-VanityInKnickers]

Plaintiff should have ask JJ to ammend his complaint to return it exactly as he bought it especially if she wasn't willing to award him what he put into it. He could have taken his engine out and put the old engine back in and told JJ just to give him back his $500 and for them to come and pick up the vehicle in the condition he bought it, eating the cost of the fixed scratch and his time. Then he could have turned around and sold the engine for closer to what he paid for it then what she was willing to give. Because giving them back a now RUNNING vehicle makes it worth more and the defendants are getting out ahead and they can turn around and sell it at a much higher value because it's no longer in poor condition. This is one of the few times I disagree with JJ's assessment of the situation.

[@billmoran3219]

The balls on that defendant at the end , he lied and threatened me and oh he’s a scammer . Judge Judy is wrong again, she should have made them produce the title and not give them a running car that wasn’t running when bought. Plaintiff got it in the rear on this case.

[@rhon7344]

The amount of money Jj is giving him back 🤦🏽‍♀️I would just keep the car and resale the engine and parts and he’ll come up to what he has already spent into it..👌🏽

[@yellowrice1453]

I need both of them to contact me so I can talk to them about the vehicles extended warranty.

[@erickanew]

That guy really lucky he's getting 2600, he's crazy spending all that money on a car with no title

[@brendaarnold8485]

Judy was wrong not to give the man what he paid for in parts. He had receipts but she, as usual, thinks that everyone should think the way she does.

[@pegasoltaeclair0611]

Seriously lol...she's arbitrating, and she thinks as reasonably as possible - to make a fair judgment. It's not (entirely) about her playing her own mind.

[@MEGIDIOT]

So if he had spent $1m, the defendants should refund him that too? 😂

[@Killalilana]

@@MEGIDIOTyes the man put the work into the car and bought parts

[@muslimnerds]

Idk why people go to Judge judy ...i like her, but she never gives FULL recompense

[@brianevans6328]

Lesson to be learned, never buy the car if the seller does not possess the title.

[@geffeternal741]

He should remove all the parts he put in and return back the non-running car and get his 500 bucks back. 😅

[@MarvinForte]

Did anyone else notice that the plaintiff still had the tag on his brand new blazer? 😂

[@JO-vy5gy]

He plans to return it DUH lol

[@natalee217]

A lot of blazers come like that, it's a style, you don't remove it. He's old school.

[@Lulu10-t9k]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@QAsession]

Great observation.

[@travishoopes9626]

I didn't until you just pointed it out. Had to go watch closer! LOL

[@sothathappened]

these people are all unbelievable. why is it always people who have 30 years of experience who do things that don't make sense. and that woman is a straight up liar and scammer.

[@writerchik44]

Just is 1000000% right. Anyone who has taken a BASIC LAW class knows this. 👏

[@dougmurray3692]

It's not "punitive". It's linked to good faith and torte law. They had a deal and he's just supposed to think of anybody who he buys something from as being shady. This is what the law has become - a distortion of facts through legal 'opinion'. Consequences occur due to being shady, as fully demonstrated by the defendants, and rewarding them by opting him money that HE has to swallow penalized him. And this is considered fair. No this kind of fair encourages more scamming, especially by those who now leave the court with a form of permission because of WEAK justice. It was a set-up, and Judy helped these criminals.

[@rheverend]

I don’t think JJ got this one right. Regardless of whether he was stupid to fix up a car without a title, if he spent that money, he should get it all back.

[@kenyeshaspencer4683]

I agree !!!

[@RC-mc6pu]

Lol. NOPE..He is too stupid. Why spend so much and expect them to pay for it?

[@GFBSTPPI]

@@RC-mc6pu bc he spent it under false pretences

[@MrExtremehustler]

Nope, good judgment. “Reasonable”. Meaning less than or equal to the value of the car. Judge won’t give 20k just because he was stupid and thinks he deserves it.

[@clarkent61]

I agree.

[@callesierra]

Can you just imagine this plaintiff and the female defendant trying to communicate with each other😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@jodikristine956]

I’m sorry JJ but you’re wrong on this one…. You have no clue on how much ppl put into their cars because I’m pretty sure u buy brand new ones off the lot! Ppl aren’t as fortunate as u so if they wanna put money into a $500 vehicle then let it be! U trying to make this man feel like he’s in the wrong when they scammed him!

[@JulieRainyPDX]

Another option is to buy a non-running vehicle at an auto auction WITH a title.

[@le0854]

The defendent lost the case but then became the winner when the car was returned. They are getting back a running car that has been fixed plus they got the $500 from the sale, plus court paid their award for them, real winners..

[@skyloft1111]

but the humiliation to be aired on the show - is it really worth it lol

[@johnsmi213]

@@skyloft1111 Probably before KZbin was a thing. But now that it lives on in infamy, they might regret it.

[@shendisackett]

As other people said hopefully the cousins wife gets wind of this and demands the car back! After all she never signed it over to her husband.

[@angeleyes103064]

I'd return the car they way he bought it A car that wasnt running Take the engine out and have it towed to their house

[@MaseRhea]

Is his look of shock the light finally going off in his head that he played himself?

[@TookieKnows]

Exactly. It’s got to be. And him not understanding the logic that JJ was using in her judgment. The mother though is just as delusional

[@MEGIDIOT]

His sense of entitlement is crazy

[@eroshiyda]

when two scammers try to scam each other at the same time 😂

[@kennakellon8852]

why was he getting so upset? That's a very reasonable price and he's lucky to have gotten that

[@missindependent4711]

He paid money to repair the car. He is out the money and time he spent on the car. Even worst the plaintiffs now have a fully operational vehicle. They have the car in a better state than when he bought it for less than the value of the car.

[@packergeek10]

@@missindependent4711 He not only paid money but put time in. It's not an easy task to put a new engine in a car. They now get all the labor for free as well. I would drive that car off a cliff.

[@Jasmine-gf8hb]

The mom is slow af..she still doesn’t get it lol

[@groowanderer]

So he has to return a running car when they illegally sold him a non- running car? JJ blows it again...

[@billiep4338]

Scammers scamming the scammers. What’s the world coming to 😂

[@Yourock123]

The defendants were definitely scamming..HOWEVER, the plaintiff trying to get MORE money than he should, makes him TOO, a scammer.

[@brt5273]

TRUTH!

[@RoughJustice2k18]

Actually the plaintiff trying to get more money out of the deal, makes him a hustler. The defendant however, is a scammer selling a car which wasn't hers to begin with. There was no title, that should be a red flag.

[@Andyxxx2006]

jj: "i don't care" the plaintiff : "ok:" lol... that part is funny.

[@RollOpeo1]

this woman is in a crazy world of her own, it's like she didn't even hear what jj said

[@RoughJustice2k18]

She is suffering from selective hearing coupled with intelligence deficit disorder.

[@bill1957111]

Judge Judy missed the mark on this one. Now she wants the plaintiff to give them the car back in running order and then he’ll get $2500 when book value is 3200. She can be so inconsistent

[@jimmydurham9318]

It's not unusual to buy a low mileage engine and a couple of spare parts for $3,200 knowing the car gonna be running another 10 years.

[@brt5273]

Sure, but kind of STUPID to buy it and put it into something you don't legally own.

[@ncqueenbee9838]

@@brt5273 JJ trying to explain that to the plaintiff was truly painful to watch.

[@corneliuswesley6617]

JJ usually doesn’t rule in illegal activity,the guy should be happy with her ruling and SHUT UP before he loses the case

[@sexycreola7]

I'm just curious how is that illegal what he did. Stupid yes for sure. Maybe he was certain he'd get the title so it would be kosher. But I don't think he intentionally meant to do anything illegal.

[@renettegreggs2651]

Sure you're right ☝🏽👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

[@kylenielsen5341]

He didn't do anything illegal. They did, but not him.

[@16MedicRN]

​@@kylenielsen5341that's exactly right.

[@BLM_Big_Lipped_Marxist]

LMFAOOOOOOOO @ the nickel purchasing non-working car worth less than $3,000 *WITHOUT* the pink slip/title for $500 then preceding to spend 3,000 in repairs *BEFORE* getting the pink slip. Let’s all say... STEW PET NICKEL. Because no normal person would do such a STEW PET NICKEL thing. 😂😂😂

[@ishahcanah7351]

😂😂😂❤ Judge Judy is the best.

[@Darellbefree]

If it was me. I'd be putting back all the old parts and selling whatever was installed. I'd be towing it back to them😅 😅

[@SirPaulMuaddib]

I wonder if he removed the engine he purchased....before giving it back, would that have been allowed?

[@wintercame]

Brilliant. I hope he does, because what recourse would they have?

[@T.MCJ1911]

I don’t think he could because she told him to physically drive it over to them meaning she wants the car to be returned as it is

[@RobinPM86]

then how would he get it back to the woman's house? That was the judge's ruling: he'd get the money when he drove the car back to her house. Unless he has a friend with a tow truck.

[@phDST1913]

He probably put the old engine back in and then had it towed to them. I would at least do that and just get my $500 back and then get another $500 car. Only thing he would lose is the cost of towing and personal labor time.

[@wintercame]

@@phDST1913 I wouldn't blame him a bit, though it's a huge PITA in terms of the labor involved.

[@TravFletch]

He probably is a scammer that’s why he went with it all👏🏻 $500 for a car and thinking you’re gonna flip it and resale for 12k👀

[@ghee6683]

Atp the mother givin slow...

[@alison546d]

veryyyyyy slow

[@albertol9654]

These 2 scammers met their match 🤣😂

[@babayaga6615]

Hopefully the scammers cousin's wife will want her car back and they don't get away with it.

[@shendisackett]

Hopefully!

[@lukerinderknecht2982]

I wonder if the ex wife is watching this and laughing 😂

[@bornaries7213]

I must be just as smart as JJ because I was wondering why put money in to it in just a week before getting the title?! I think I missed my calling as a judge!🤔😖