World of Warships- Guided Missiles Are In The Works, And You Can Try Them RIGHT Now

[@CrimsonSam411]

This will go the exact same way as subs. - People will like it in the PVE mode. - WG will invest massive resources because "this is what players want" and will make it crayon-eaterproof. - Player will absolutely despise it because it doesn't fit the PVP gameplay and isn't fun to receive. - WG will shove in the game anyway because of sunken cost fallacy.

[@richardbell7678]

Have you played subs, in co-op? They are terrible, in co-op. Worse, the enemy bot subs have much better games than the player subs. The problem is that enemy bots do not stay unsunk by your team mates long enough to do anything but shotgun an enemy that is presenting a bow-on profile, for very little damage, as you either fired at too short a range to do much damage, or the bot dodges your torpedoes.

[@CrimsonSam411]

@@richardbell7678 I'm talking about the PVE Halloween mode that took place years ago. Players played subs with unguided torps. The bots were surface ships and catapults.

[@xPureNRG007x]

@@richardbell7678 Not meaning to offend, but my question is how much have you played subs in Coop? I find them easy: single ping and all your torps hit at range. Every time. If you are getting too close trying to shotgun that is the issue - post nerf damage reduction killed shotgunning, so stay just outside of detection. Sub vs sub is dead, but as any other ship bot subs are the easiest to kill. They never go below periscope depth.

[@richardbell7678]

@@xPureNRG007x I have only played 228 battles, in subs (out of 18339, in total). The biggest problem, in my experience, has been targets living long enough for the torpedoes to arrive. Other than sounding the klaxon by pressing "N", it is for me to have any fun, so I just don't bother. I get one torpedo strike in and my team has to have really sucked for there to be anything else surviving to shoot at.

[@xPureNRG007x]

@@richardbell7678 Ah, thank you for the clarification! 100% correct & accurate as well. When the team is even halfway competent getting hits is tough. Asymmetrical Battles has been a much better experience in that regard, but it is only a temp mode.

[@RJKuta]

if they do what they did in World of tanks (Cold war) think it was called that, might of been modern armour, it will be new tech trees, separate to the current trees. Basically another game within a game

[@irishwind1971]

World of MordernShips could be interesting. But I feel it wouldn't be as well received since subs and airpower is way more crucial than in WW1/WW2. Plus balancing everything so ships of the same time frame can be in the same matches would be a huge challenge.

[@botaccount5166]

@@irishwind1971 Even with SAMS. Wargaming would never buff AA.

[@Trae4k]

It has to be. Even superships arent modern

[@xPureNRG007x]

Modern ships almost demand much larger maps and a more strategic approach. It’s the same problem that CVs create.

[@kingofcastlechaos]

I refuse to play the superships because they belong in their own game. The game within a game would work for me.

[@NDK0]

An idea for this game so that it might survive: Era play; as you choose tiers, you could be able to choose an era. WW1, WW2, COLD WAR, MODERN, FUTURE. Then they could essentially create any type of ship and/or weapons as long it suits the era.

[@zabarang1]

That's a good idea also.

[@sacatomatos41]

Yeah, I like that idea!

[@abr2926]

so you gonna split a shrinking player base into multiple eras. So what will that do to cue times> Do you want to play half bot teams in random battles?

[@zabarang1]

@abr2926 No matter what they do, some of us are going to like it. Some are going to hate it. I'm hoping they don't screw it up so bad trying to make everyone happy that no one likes it.

[@UberHypnotoad]

Next from wargaming: sharks with friggin’ laser beams attached to their heads.

[@bujmoose3992]

But only because the player base demanded it! 🙄🙄

[@zabarang1]

Don't forget the dolphins swimming up and placing mines,

[@santiagopadilla417]

There is another possibility. Wargaming is testing a new game: world of Starships, and that would be cool.

[@xPureNRG007x]

They ought to. I have not found a Star Trek game that I can play like I play WoWS.

[@petrosmarko3092]

It was fun ride guys. See ya on the next one. Will gladly sell my acc.

[@bastianfarstvede8634]

What ships (joke)

[@NoName-sb9tp]

Will buy it (joke)

[@phoenixtalon100]

well we have no idea if they're actually adding them. besides, none of the ships in game are modern enough to make use of it, so even if they do decide to add them, they'd likely be a seperate "modern" game mode

[@BlackHearthguard]

@@phoenixtalon100 Do you remember how subs started in warships?

[@brandondaway1]

​@@BlackHearthguard Subs would have been fine if they didn't get homing torps and more situational awareness than regular surface ships. Their subs, they should play like subs but WeeGee wants them to play like stealth on demand DDs

[@middllepl]

Well, An Shan class was modernized for missiles, New Jersey was planned to be modernized for missiles, so it's kinda expected. Problem is in ballance, and as we all know very well, wg is not that good in ballance

[@QALibrary]

Likewise the Sherman-class destroyer - four were converted to guided-missile destroyers and served until the 1980s

[@scottling6366]

It makes more sense monetarily to push out 4000 new ships, instead of fixing game issues that would seem relatively simple to correct. Matchmaker is just one example of a fix that should be implemented. Whatever. Probably time to go find a new game...

[@drakeconsumerofsoulsandche4303]

Neustrashimy was built IRL with missiles

[@00spinz35]

I'm all for it if the missiles only lock onto to CVs, even if there's no CV in your match, It Sn just lock onto a CV in a completely different match and go hit that one

[@middllepl]

@@00spinz35 lmao, true

[@davinritcharoen9922]

I wish WG make this kind of unrealistic arcade mode permanent (or at least one every update). It's very refreshing, casual and perfect for relieving stress from the conventional PVP modes.

[@steveoltjenbruns2366]

Ya’ll thought CVs were bad now? Just wait until they’re CVNs with F4 phantoms launching off them 😅

[@Dragonwolf920]

As a console tanks player this doesnt scare as when they did add missiles they basically put it in an entirely seperate game mode with its own tech trees with no crossover to ww2 vehicles. If they go that path i think it'll be fine

[@suryia6706]

I hope so

[@bohba13]

especially if the Ticos and Burkes are on the table. or the Kirov and Oscars.

[@RUHappyATM]

What's next? Thermonuclear missiles?

[@BlackHearthguard]

Ssssh, don't give them ideas...

[@gotfrydzbouillon4191]

Well Iowa class ship was modernise to use 1KT atomic 406mm Shells.

[@thebes56]

I would rather see tier two and three get pre-dreadnoughts all the way back to the Spanish-American war...

[@xPureNRG007x]

Love this idea. Armored cruisers, protected cruisers. Was surprised when he said they are doing this on Lesta. Imagine taking a current T3 ship into battle and actually being the king of the sea in a match!

[@bigchungusfootfungus1964]

Apparently the Russians are already testing that out on their servers

[@ombraforza5780]

Sea Lord, secondary battery reload booster is basically the pan American funny button

[@sealordmountbatten]

I guess so huh lol

[@xPureNRG007x]

And before that I believe Hannover’s funny button.

[@SteelxWolf]

Smaland will have a use for those little guys above the torps. Sucks I never got Smaland when I had the chance

[@Warewolverineski]

Yup Småland is mine regret too along Jean Bart :/

[@SteelxWolf]

@@Warewolverineski 😭

[@kingofcastlechaos]

Smaland was leaving right after I hit T5, and I played this damn game every free minute. On the last day I sold EVERYTHING and even converted all my FXP , Commanders, etc. I did get it and when I play it I have fun but OMG I was stupid.

[@Warewolverineski]

@@kingofcastlechaos T5 ... and you have started to play T10 , oh buddy how is your WR after that ? ;)

[@taiko1237]

Early antiship missiles were typically radar guided using the radar of the launching ship and a telemetry link to a modified gun fire control computer, although some (like the ones on the Smaland) had terminal radar homing guidance. I'm not sure how I'd implement that in game, but it definitely wouldn't be with a ping mechanic. And the original means of countering them was lots and lots of radar controlled antiaircraft guns (Soviet quad 45mm or 57mm guns, for example, or various different 40mm mounts used by NATO nations, as well as heavier autocannons). Not CIWS or EW.

[@xPureNRG007x]

Great info!

[@Raycer84]

I could see missiles coming into the game if they create another line of ships post World War II and either a battle mode for just those ships or re-vamp random battles so that if you’re in a post 1950s ship that you’re in a whole separate battle group

[@bohba13]

they need to seperate missiles from the base pool if they want to impliment it. especially if they impliment Agis ships like the Ticos or Burkes.

[@jasonchristie4873]

I think missiles could work, however, I don't think they should be like torpedoes. I think they would work well like the Dutch airstrikes. You select an area you want to hit, and instead of planes dropping bombs, you send missiles over. However, as a trade off, instead of the many lesser damage bombs the Dutch ships drop, these would have fewer missiles but more damage and pen.

[@mauwalker]

It can’t possibly be worse than homing torpedoes or carriers. It would be interesting to get a Kynda-class cruiser for example, and hit a heavily armored cruiser or battleship with a missile. They’d be glass cannons because modern ships aren’t armored. They wouldn’t be able to hose them off like crazy. It’d end up being something with low refresh, constrained targeting protocols like requiring line of sight and a missile lock to use, and they’d be restricted to the high tiers where the 1950s ships are now meaning T8+. They’d end up having to add CIWS and countermeasures like chaff, and make them AA-targetable so you’d see T7-8 cruisers and battleships firing their AA suites at incoming missiles. Frankly I suspect it would end up looking something like the CVs in the end.

[@BlackHearthguard]

Thinking it can't be worse is purely a failure of imagination.

[@DJPon7]

You forget that WG does not go by irl specifications. They can make a missile ship as armored as they want

[@irishwind1971]

Harpoons carry 500 pounds of explosives, the P-15/SS-N-2 family has 1000# warhead. And ships carry limited amounts of these missiles. So a salvo of 4 should be no different than a drop from bombers carrying similar bombs. The question will be play balance, like how good the homing stays true, AAA against subsonic missiles, how many salvos do a ships get, etc.

[@xPureNRG007x]

We know from Torpedoes that they give nonhistorical load outs via reloads.

[@painzx3ify]

Tier 15 Moskva is an artificial reef.

[@Stvnpetersen]

When subs came out I was thinking ship-based asw would be helicopter based (plane based asw was predominantly long range) as the characteristics of asw in-game mimics short-ranged helicopter based homing torps which wasn't a thing in real world until mid sixties. The concept of air strikes is/has been a worrying development for me since the Dutch Cruisers were launched 😟

[@lightningwingdragon973]

If missiles are in the works, I hope that means an 80's battleship NJ is also being worked on!

[@gameover_477]

If they want to do missiles just copy what world of tanks does and make a seperate MM for cold war ships with missiles.

[@Momofukudoodoowindu]

Kirov, my beloved guided missile battle cruiser. We stand a chance to be reunited once again 🫂😔🤍

[@mikedignum1868]

There is always a plan behind whatever WG brings out.

[@ircriket]

No new maps or game modes just more gimmicks. Other than the special events of course but some more battle maps would be great.

[@cookiecola5852]

Really no matter what, CV might will generally dominating the matches

[@BlackHearthguard]

AFAIK, there was *one* type of guided anti-ship missile during the WWII, Fritz X. Though the Germans also deployed flying bombs.

[@bonemeal_boi]

What about H293 and the BAT bomb?

[@jkirschy]

Pretty sure Fritz X wasn't a missile. If I remember right it was a glide bomb with a guidance package on it.

[@outsidein3206]

Missiles 2.0 was only a matter of time as content was filled out in lines. Guided missiles off the tracking torps is easily a constraint you can marry up, the difference being time to impact. Def SuS

[@julianfan5794]

This new operation looks a lot like the anime Arpeggio of Blue steel as well, shields, laser guns on warships Super fun!

[@zhuravlevivan4622]

We already seen fast, skimming torpedoes, now we get ballistic missiles

[@kaiserwilhelmshatner3156]

*KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!!!!*

[@VaIpire]

Guys I’m saving up steel for my first ever steel ship, should I get the mecklenburg or the Bourgoune? I mainly play German BBs but I’ve heard a lot of good things abt the bour

[@nick_pappagiorgio]

Sea Power: Naval Combat in the Missile Age will be implementing missiles, perhaps there are some mechanics WOWS can emulate to bring missiles in a fun way into high tier/Cold War ships.

[@bohba13]

so good news, just as many of the ships weren't around for missiles, the missiles weren't designed to hit armored hulls as ships that had those were all retired or scrapped at that point. (save NJ) so Armor would still be somewhat effective against these missiles as often they were delayed contact fuses, relying solely on the mass and speed of the missile to penetrate the hull, without any hardened penetrators on the missile. unfortunately for cruisers, many of you don't have that needed armor. (german cruisers reverse powercreeped again!)

[@SanBrunoBeacon]

This is great news. I have been hoping for a cold war version of the game with different types of offensive and defensive missiles and additional systems such as the Phalanx CIWS. Although the new WOW ships are more advanced than cold war ships, these types of advanced ships are exactly what the game needs to attract new players and keep long time players.

[@homefront1999]

Honestly, if done well and with the purpose of fun in mind. I wouldn't mind if they went away from the current setup they have. Where they seem to want to do more arcade type of things. But seem confined to some weird sense of realisim. Again, if done well, I think having a system in place where you can spec into your ship would be cool. Like modifying the guns and so on. Say they implement a system to replace the current module system. Just like commanders. Have some type of skill/perk system for a ship. Where you can choose to invest your points you earn into certain parts of a ship.

[@jerrywise1194]

They have seen "Sea Power" Micro prose game that arrives in November, a Missile age naval game. They don't want to lose to many Players. They have a Missouri with Tomahawk Missile's , Phalanx systems, Radar, and lots of other goodies. The game looks very Interesting and a large encyclopedia Ships available to play. The game is still in development, currently single player but if they do a multi-player.

[@xPureNRG007x]

That game looks pretty good. More simulation than arcade, so limited crossover with the audience. Hoping enough to make Sea Power a success and increase Wows at the same time. Quality players are needed again, way too many low quality players now - I had actually thought it couldn’t get any worse, then it did.

[@xPureNRG007x]

All the speculation made me think of a split: make the current game “World of Battleships” and remove CVs from it. Then make “World of CVs” and make T2 the first CV and their era ships, with current high tier CVs being more mid tier. This would allow for larger and more strategic gameplay elements for CVs, and more modern ships as well.

[@michaelmcnally2331]

I have seen a lot of people that see, to do WoWs videos also looking at that new Sea Power game which obviously more modern setting. I suspect the missiles feature may be some sort of response to that with more modern ships coming. New Jersey incoming with 1980’s modernisation anyone fitted with harpoon and tomahawk missiles.

[@Levi-uw6pr]

New Jersey finally coming into the game was my initial thought seeing 'missiles.' Her all kitted out with tomahawks and the modernized mast would be awesome.

[@zabarang1]

I play this game a lot because of the time frame. I would love to see the ship I served on be in the game, used to be DE but changed to FF. Kind of in between old and new. FF 1082 to be exact but it wouldn't be a reasonable fit. Make a mirror server that starts at the first missile ships and grows on up to more modern. You get to keep the old, introduce the new almost like a new game.

[@mr.skully8787]

Cant wait for tomahwaks and scud missile

[@wojtek1582]

Rather different types will be used and from earlier ages.

[@gstormcz]

It could be fun with new weapons. But I think it should be either temporary mode or some way split from historical ship. Even if it was new tiers. But I don't think WoWs has so big playerbase to absorb more than current number of tiers. You finally said already. It would be at least weird if Ww2 historical ships with their era armament had to face laser and guided missile ships is some distant future update. But the Star Trek port was probably one of most eye catching and joyous new things in WoWs.. (so I get that WG goes on this topic) New camo with kaboom monochromatic explosion of ship sounds like another interesting stuff.

[@syukrir.robert8994]

Btw SeaLord, Im more inclined toward the shield is the one that is under test and going to be implemented first since Lesta is testing their armor integrity mechanics.

[@jkirschy]

The French use Exocet anti-ship missiles. And if you want to play floaty boats in the missile age, just buy Sea Power when it comes out (in November?).

[@legohistorysam]

Dude, I can’t wait for them to put USS Gyatt DDG-1 in the game!!

[@rivetjoint9628]

Missiles come, I go.

[@donaldmonroe8503]

Jim called, this is the end. I’m out.

[@cyborgvalkyrie]

1:43 That is not, in any way, the ready room from the Enterprise-D. No fish tank, no plexi desk, no Stargazer model, no crystal on the desk, and no geodes on shelves.

[@tsuaririndoku]

You can use superships in this event btw

[@unowno123]

I hope they make a new game "cold war of warships" where its a 10 v 10 match every time, no tiers, tons of expencive skins, and you can only buy ships or unlock them through lots of grinding this is basically the EA, modern video game meta, where you put up a free to play game that has everyone in the same lobby, undivided by tiers or such and the main income is skins (and likely paid ships) I would happily support that honestly.

[@TheDragonHunta]

Missile ships if they get added will be "balanced" similar to the tromp. Bad armor, slow, bad guns, but you get missiles.

[@Kii_to_Victory]

Im not sure if this is true or not, but apparently, the Grozovoi line was initially going to have unguided anti-ship missiles in place of torpedoes. Apparently, the icons for the missiles are buried somewhere in the game's files. Not sure if any of this is true, but I figured that I'd share this regardless.

[@sealordmountbatten]

Yes those are the missiles I’m referring to at the start of the missile section

[@Kii_to_Victory]

@@sealordmountbatten Seems like i need to rewatch that segment. I must've misinterpreted what you said or just outright missed it.

[@Banana_BOI1]

People in the comments dont realize how bad this is. Not only there's a chance we might head into modern ships a la WT (which tbh I don't want, I play WoWS for the WW2 theme. Side note yes ik WT doesn't have modern ships but they have modern tanks/planes, that's what I meant), but we all know WG's terrible balancing. Missiles implies CIWS but we know how shit AA is currently. What makes you guys think they'll make CIWS any different? Press a button, missiles fly away, no skill involved to adjust aim since missiles are guided, shoot and forget, while the enemy's CIWS barely shoots down 1-2 of them out of a barrage of 8-10 missiles. Sincerely hope this never makes it to the live game...

[@Tomreese130]

This was literally a meme and a joke for the longest time. Just like hybrid submarines, no one ever thought it would happen...

[@JerzeyBoy]

Yeah. I fucking called it! USS Kentucky BB66 Dockyard!

[@HONGKELDONGKEL1888]

My thoughts is that these ships should blast each other in space and not on the water like we normally do, if WG does implement these weaponry in the game. Or move the tiers up to XII or something, just like what gaijin did with war tandoor: modern MBTs fighting late ww2 to early cold war tanks would have been terrible for player retention since folks grinding on the older vehicles would have a grand old time fighting tonks with ERA, APS, darts, etc etc.

[@edhales2994]

if missles were added id like 2 things number 1 would be to have them act as consumeables, get 4-8 missles a match and once there done there done and i want a county class destroyer

[@stevepeterson6070]

I think every DD should have a few intercontinental satellite guided nuclear missiles that will automatically seek and 1-shot the farthest away enemy CV. This missile should have a 100% success rate and not need the CV to be spotted to work. It should be ready to launch within 15 seconds of the start of the war. Then and only THEN will CVs experience what it is like to be a DD in a CV game.

[@sirbowserfelix9293]

Honestly, I do hope we get missiles soon, I think they will be fun addition to the game. I doubt it wowuld be a 'infinite refill' of missiles, but I want them in game asap.

[@Bossman-pg8kk]

If that happens, you will have nobody to play with

[@sirbowserfelix9293]

Let's wait and see, since the game "is dying" since it started years ago

[@suryia6706]

Hope we can opt out of this "Enterprise" stuff. I'm here to play arcade warships. If I want to do Space ships, there are lots of options already!

[@octaviusmorlock]

Modern ships could be very fun if they're in their own bracket of matchmaker.

[@jeramikolberg9532]

I Would like a pre dreadnought game. Like Hms Dreadnought is a t10 ship Uss Texas t10

[@Joey_Liu]

USS New Jersey incoming?!?

[@nathanwinters9272]

Exocet was french anti ship missle, know it was plane launched I'm sure they could launch from a vessel or might had different model

[@8RedBear5]

I wouldn't mind seeing mid century warship tech. But only if the current ships in the game that would face these weapons got a buff or abilities to fight against them.

[@quoniam426]

The port is NOT the ready room. ENT D Ready room doesn't have slanded viewports. Captain's quarters on deck 5 do... However, the layout of the desk on the side makes more think of Intrepid class ready room. So I guess they went for a mix of VOY ready room and TNG captain's quarters, even Enterprise E captain's quarters given the griddes lights beneath the windows that appeared on the E and didn't exist in TNG. In fact, I'm gonna say that the desk not facing the windows is how Picard's quarters appear in Nemesis ! As for guided missiles, well, they already exist... guided torpedoes from subs... suffice to put them above water, bang you have guided missiles.

[@F_Around_and_find_out]

Next: nuclear warhead torpedoes are in the works.

[@killim2948]

I love missiles in any war game ive played but i don't know how well they'll be implemented here.

[@redramage]

I'd be open to splitting the game into three eras: -predreadnoughts, armored and protected cruisers, early gunboats -late WW1 to WW2 -cold war/missile era I just don't want more broken anachronistic stuff infecting my shooty bote mode game

[@BarrettL1970]

Forest Sherman...it was a thing, it was a Missle dd after refit...do it!

[@Cerberus0076]

(one extra long black eye brow lifting:) Doesn't sound too logical to me, Captain

[@yeeyeee9726]

Idk if Wargaming themselves has ever said anything about this but is there a possible of a cold war era wow coming out? Sorta like the cold war world of tanks. Maybe this could be eluding to that?

[@JLFillman]

I want a Borg Yamato!!!

[@barrown1275]

There is a borg skin for the Yamato coming soon.

[@seebar8179]

Correction: "CIWS" is not the angry little spinning gatling gun, but just any Close in Weapon System. This includes the Phallanx, RAM, SeaRAM, Millenium, Goalkeeper, Kashtan etc.

[@stevehaas9876]

in a ww2 game play style.... sure why not. We have SUBS that go 40 knots underwater in ww2 play style... why not

[@ellnoskitties3908]

I do remember when missiles were talked about originally; WG even had a russian (of course) DD all set up for it. Turned out the missiles were WAY too accurate and ships had no defense against them. This is a bad idea, so WG should have it implemented by Christmas. Poorly.

[@BlackHearthguard]

Can't be the Halloween event. It's in the PTS _now,_ during the same month as Halloween.

[@jasper5878]

I don't mind the addition of missiles however they can't be like Homing torpedos. It needs to be a skill based mechanism

[@sealordmountbatten]

It is a bit more skill based, because once you hit the ship with your ping, the missiles launch. No chance to change where the ping hit like submarines can. So you only get one shot at it.

[@tatsuhirosatou5513]

Modern surface ships with missiles would really suck in the game if it was even close to realistic, Modern ships have no armor plus battleship and cruiser artillery do significantly higher damage than cruise missles to the point in the 80s the ussr was worried about the iowas because they determined that even with thier huge shipwreck cruiser missiles they couldn't actually sink an iowa. Plus thanks to operation crossroads we know battleships and heavy cruisers can just tank nukes with little to no damage unless the bomb detonates underwater within 150m of the ship

[@jamesharrington001]

And ya'll called me crazy. I said when they started working guided torps, that guided missiles were going to be the next things.

[@gkagara]

Well if they really make ARP replica as much in the anime it would have some sort of shield and laser

[@darkroom0716]

Hoping this gives us the USS New Jersey hybrid full of tomahawks

[@LegionaryOfRome]

Remember the halloween event that introduced submarines.

[@peacemakerle]

The good days of this game are in the past.

[@Davidious]

I am pretty sure I remember wargaming saying they have already tested guided missiles years ago.

[@robjmck]

How boring and gimmicky to keep the kiddies happy, this a warship game, go play star trek online if you want, leave WOWS alone!

[@Santander_wows]

If they add missle to main game make them seprate mode and add the 1960 + config or draft of existing ship or plans

[@BlackHearthguard]

Subs were going to be in their own mode too...

[@xPureNRG007x]

Vapid speculation running rampant with this one. All I see is WG making use of existing mechanics (namely torpedo homing and the invulnerability shield from so many temporary operations) to make an attempt at an engaging Star Trek collaboration.

[@ThrottleFox]

i dont think guided missiles will hit the normal game, it will be for this mode for fun, then shelved. The reason I dont play WarThunder as much, even though there monetization is better then World of Walletships, is because my tiger tanks see cold war tanks and tanks using rounds it cant defend against, as well as WWII tanks seeing A-10s(yes I've had this happened). I like WT ship combat more then WoW, but same issue, WWII ships that see missle boats made in the 80s. I love the idea of the 'enduring confrontation' mode where its a big ass battle lasting hours and not a little 12v12 lasting 15 minutes. But the balance in that game is busted to all hell sometimes

[@StreeterPerw]

Wondering if missles mean T11, T12 ships, like maybe cold war era ships? Though I doubt that.

[@1991ace1]

Missiles, what's next: the nuke butten to win the game instantly?

[@mikehenthorn1778]

Vampire vampire vampire we have missiles and bound. Maybe they will fix the tears and the missile equipped ships will get their missiles at a different tear and not be in the tech line..

[@iiagdtr]

*IF* WG would keep a 'classic mode' without all these gimmicks and potentially missiles I would stay, but I am not interested in a Colorado with Phalanx CIWS or any other such insanity. That will likely be it for me and I do spend money on the game.

[@z6a99c]

I told everyone that it is coming but all said I was crazy. See it's here

[@clmwrx]

I predict wg eventually makes a separate game for modern warships. I guess they could add them in this game but I dunno

[@tevaleberga8235]

Well...at this point, I'm optimist, I prefer real cold war ships than another op sci-fi vodka line.

[@chrisjohnson1560]

maybe cuz weve been playing from ships thats r really old and never had missles they might make a new line where we can play world of warships with more advanced mode with missles and and permanent radar and modern anti missle defense systems where the combat will change

[@joshuayang0331]

My answer? No! Just no Put it in current game it would be worst than Hildebrand Put it in t12 or 13? Just think about how much is the repair cost of the t11, not workable

[@bastianfarstvede8634]

Nah tier 12 or 13 is to low has to be 15 so there NO chance for gun ships tp meet them

[@WisKy64VT]

AS THE USS WISCONSIN PLEASE LET ME HAVE MY NUKE TOMAHAWKS