World of Warships - I Sank Your Waifu

[@julianfan5794]

“Atlanta is weak to AP” Overpens and RNG: “That’s where you’re wrong kiddo”

[@MyVanir]

He literally said exactly that.

[@Kuronezumiko]

As a comparison i really like how the Azur Lane EN twitter will post a tweet showcasing a wall of shame to all accounts that got banned, each month, for cheating.

[@kyokyoniizukyo7171]

Its a glorious thing~ Utterly glorious!

[@shinkicker404]

Yeah, seems like BS that they can’t say the guy was banned when you have examples of games like Azur Lane that will name and shame the cheaters quite gleefully. They aren’t giving out RL details about the person.

[@DerPolygonianer]

I'm guessing that the Difference stems from where the Company is located. Wargaming is polish I think and therefore falls under EU Data Protection Laws while Azur Lane is what? Korean? Chinese? I still think that giving out a Username doesn't break Data Protection. After all, who actually uses his real Name in the Internet.

[@jediael9906]

@@DerPolygonianer me

[@AnimeSunglasses]

​@@DerPolygonianer Wargaming.net is based in Belarus originally, and Cyprus internationally. Belarus is not in the EU, which is unfortunate for the Belorussians, because they could probably kick Lukashenko out more easily if they were. And he'd definitely be more likely to face charges for his human rights abuses. Lots of companies set up international corporate offices in Cypress because it IS in the EU, but has nice relaxed tax and finance laws. Azur Lane is, in fact, Chinese. Poland ain't perfect, but it's earned a better rep in the game industry (and in general) than that!

[@dougjb7848]

Coming soon: ability to mute a player’s quick commands for 10€ per month.

[@_.Glennicus._]

Calculate that to US dollars and then I'd say, maybe XD

[@blastorange2460]

* per game well really per token which you can get in packs of 10 100 or 200

[@brextonridgdell8564]

TAKE MY MONEY

[@johnfarscape]

I could have sworn the title was " I spank you Waifu" the first time I read it.

[@robbleeker4777]

same

[@WreckItRa1ph]

lol

[@Ensign_Cthulhu]

You filthy-minded bastard, LOL

[@iambiggus]

I think it should be lol.

[@onewhosaysgoose4831]

How do you think he sank her? ;)

[@maxomai]

Jingles (16:44): "They're down two ships to just the one enemy." Narrator: "They were actually down four." This has been today's edition of Checking Jingles's Math.

[@TonboIV]

Checking Jingles' counting.

[@daveno8432]

HERE HERE !! in the UK those backwards sods say "MATHS" :P

[@chemislife]

@@DrakeHunter324 we never did get to directly hold him accountable. Though we did throw a bunch of egg in England's face for his stupidity.

[@trulyoffensive446]

"I Sank Your Waifu" -> I_sunk_your_Waifu

[@jamesfindlay7150]

why can't war gaming just say "A PLAYER HAS BEEN BANNED" then put up the date it was reported. Where is the breach of data protection in doing that?

[@Pt_Lacky]

James Findlay Steam do it, so there shouldn’t be.

[@klonik79]

cos they do not understand what a personal data is. Even though GDPR law in EU quite explicit on it ... in game nick is not personal data, if they posted e-mail address with ban info at that point they would breach the law, with just nick no ...Also telling we are going to limit services provided to them is not personal data ... Since US laws on this matter are more lax then EU's not sure what they mumble about ... :)

[@W4lt3r89]

@@klonik79 Ubisoft doesn't seem to have any issue of broadcasting the names of accounts that have been banned for toxic behavior or hacking, even people you haven't ever seen. Heck, you can see those messages appear in pro league games too.

[@bobmat343]

War Thunder posts a list of banned users every few weeks, no reason war gaming can't do the same thing.

[@arrrtoodeetoo8082]

Why are people allowed to hide their profiles?

[@chuckles9702]

For the record, I love how ArenaNet handled this in Guild Wars 1. A giant god of death would appear out of the ground and reap the cheater; signalling to all that his account was banned.

[@d0nKsTaH]

same chuckles that plays Warband?

[@nadjlegos656]

If WOWS did this they could possibly use the Kraken or something similar.

[@jimwolaver9375]

@@nadjlegos656 Have the kraken tentacles reach up out of the water and pull you ship under? GREAT idea! Troll is looking at his screen trolling and suddenly his client exits with no explanation. The rest of us see the kraken animation and hear a ship being crumpled up and pulled under.

[@siegesquirrel42]

"I Sank Your Waifu" sounds like a rejected title for Kantai Collection.

[@jimmyseaver3647]

Oh god, Jingles is sinking further into weebery. Welcome to the Dark Side. Will Akizuki get a little black headband with gold lettering?

[@HuMaNise34]

Girls und panzer was already a sign of his discent, once you go weeb, you cant go back.

[@yansuki4240]

flamu is next

[@ericmyrs]

psht. Blue headband with leaf symbol.

[@gunslingerluckytankijunky]

**poi**

[@jhoski38]

Dude already has a shelf of Sabers I think he's well and truly gone And I approve

[@dn2064]

Guess I'm a little late, but much appreciated for featuring my Atlanta replay, Jingles! I will show mercy towards some Akizukis in the future as a thank you ;)

[@IIIJG52]

No. They deserve no mercy. An atlanta withouta Citadel is not something deserving ANY mercy whatsoever.

[@Yurang80]

Lies... lol

[@RULERofSTARS]

"I GOT MY NAME IN THE TITLE OF A JINGLES VIDEO!" "He spelled it wrong..."

[@Hollywood113807]

Come on it's Jingles, We all know he's a bit crap it's why we stick around.

[@andrewlee-do3rf]

Did he call you "Dave" again? XD

[@horatiuscocles3399]

Awesome game, man! You carried your team hard to victory.

[@Reysan7]

You ever wonder if we gathered all the people that were called "Dave" to greet him.

[@dasmorbo3508]

Actually Jingles got it wrong by writing it correctly. ^^

[@trashmammal7700]

0:25 "we've got a bit of a mixed MAG for you today"

[@r.slaurent437]

APFSDS scattered among the random HESH shells

[@tntfreddan3138]

@@r.slaurent437 NSDAP randomly scattered and now disbanded all over the world...

[@andrewlee-do3rf]

Does it come with glock mags???

[@trashmammal7700]

got 69 likes, fellas we made it

[@SonOfAB_tch2ndClass]

On Invexus the only profile is still available and you can probably see that he was permabanned.

[@iambiggus]

worldofwarships.com/en/community/accounts/1021868212-Invexus/!/pvp/overview/

[@wote2760]

Good

[@willythemailboy2]

Hopefully that ban carries across all Wargaming games and not just WoWS. Also hopefully the chode had thousands of dollars of premium tanks/ships that he no longer has access to.

[@boristhebarbarian]

Invexus does NOT appear to be banned as of may 7th 17:45 CET

[@davidmoore1253]

According to na.wows-numbers.com/player/1021868212,Invexus/ he didn't play a single match in April or May so far.

[@cgross82]

The story of the U.S.S. Atlanta reminds me of one of Murphy’s Laws of Combat: Friendly Fire isn’t.

[@JohnShalamskas]

The only thing more accurate than enemy fire, is friendly fire.

[@draynaruegames]

The reload speed at the end...OMG...that's positively terrifying

[@ert-wert]

Terrifying indeed, this is the reason I play wows! That rof is straight nuts and so fun!

[@randymotter51]

23:39 "I think it's fairly safe to say that the Lyon's share of the damage..." Oh Jingles!

[@sprengmaster8607]

WG: we need replays for clarifying the circumstances. Also WG:* does not supply replay system* I didn't know that there is one now. Case in point.

[@HKirby97]

there has always been one. you just had to enable it before

[@andywatson3]

Data protection argument is bollocks. You simply add into the TOS, that if you break any of the rules you agree to your user name and sanction being published and/or shared in any format. This is probably a very minor clause compared to many of the things everyone already agreed to by clicking "I agree" without reading the TOS.

[@BenJamin-en3jb]

Also, the information "Player NICKNAME has been banned" contains nothing that needs to be protected.

[@Nukedk]

A ToS doesn't allow a company to break the law, and will still land the company in hot water. Many companies think the ToS allows it, but it doesn't.

[@Nukedk]

@@BenJamin-en3jb A nickname is often either, reused across multiple locations, or a name often used by different people, not to mention some people using their actual names. So still personal information, hence Datalaw protection.

[@andywatson3]

@@Nukedk Correct, but a ToS can give permission for data to be shared, and the law is not then broken.

[@BenJamin-en3jb]

@@Nukedk Doesn't matter, a nickname is a piece of information you chose to publicly disclose. Different kind of thinking, Wargaming gives us all kinds of info about a player based on their nick. Why should the info that the player is currently banned be more personal than the rest? It doesn't help you identify the actual person, or anything.

[@jacobseager4897]

I don't understand. War Thunder has a very similar complaint system to WOWS, and every month or so a massive (sometimes 300+) list of everyone that has been banned for abuse, cheating, excessive teamkilling etc is published there and then. I simply dont understand why WOWS does not do the same thing.

[@CJ_the_Traveller]

Jingles that response sounds like a complete copout from WG, ofc you can say an account is suspended that's all one needs to state, if that was the case nobody would be banned on forums or social media would they, it certainly would not say in such a public fashion. Your not gaining any other info, no names, emails or anything else.

[@wideyxyz2271]

WG just cant be arsed looking into bad behaviour of any kind. It costs money and time for no reward on their part and this is why they will never seriously do anything about it. Its not profitable and its less hassle just to do nothing at all. Smoke and mirrors....

[@Jognt]

Yup.. It's a shame that Jingles bought into it :(

[@baseballaable]

To the mate in the Colorado, cheers you taught my dbag of a friend a lesson. He got so flustered when wargaming gave him a ban for I think 12 matches of no random battles.

[@OR56]

That final kill on the Colorado. I am sure the Colorado player was freaking out after seeing the 5 inch High Explosive Machine Gun that the Atlanta had turned into.

[@njugunotsowildmonkey8338]

It is an important principle of jurisprudence in ANY justice system, at ANY point in history that 'Justice must be SEEN to be done'.

[@wideyxyz2271]

Unless your war gaming and it costs you time and money for now reward in which case you continue to do fuck all......

[@ACorey6910]

Reading Neptunes Inferno because of you're recommendation. Great book, Guadalcanal was a brutal baptism for the navy.

[@andreasmuller4666]

More important it´s an Atlanta with a Kraken, High Cal, Confed and SOLO WARRIOR.

[@cracklingvoice]

I've seen people farm Kraken, High Caliber, and Confederate awards all day. Arguably the most prestigious award in the game is the Solo Warrior. "Stand alone against at least 4 enemy ships and win the battle" is a task that nobody wants.

[@andreasmuller4666]

@@cracklingvoice in nearly 10k games i have only two of those myself. And damn they where hard work games.

[@dominicrobertson7626]

@@andreasmuller4666 I managed to get one in my Perth, still no idea how though and I've only got about 2k games under my belt

[@andreasmuller4666]

@@dominicrobertson7626 i g.ot over 9k games and 2 solo warriors in that time. One with the Scharnhprst when she came out first (and no one knew what a monster she can be) and one in a weird CV match

[@impaledbunny]

Thank you jingles, a world of warships video on my birthday sweet!!!! 30 today

[@Dreaded88]

@ Flaming I3unne Flaming I3unne: You turned 30!?! *_Oooh! You have to goto CAROSEL!!!_* Here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iIWqp4xri9hsb5o

[@espenwalm]

Happy birthday!

[@danofthedabs]

Happy Birthday!!

[@s.31.l50]

Happy birthday fellow salt miner

[@sevinceur1766]

Happy birthday!

[@nucleargandhi2709]

I sank your Waifu has shown us exactly how much you have to carry in order to win.

[@TheExecutorr]

10:10 was that Akizuki or just Jingles' stomach making noises?

[@ianfairfield8373]

Dude I thought I was the only one. I thought it was my stomach XD

[@TheExecutorr]

@@ianfairfield8373 I thought that too, but I went back to the beginning of the video to see the name of that Akizuki player so I could search for him to see if he has played any battles recently (he has not, apparently, so He hopefully got what he deserved), and when I jumped back I heard it again xD

[@Pilvenuga]

@@TheExecutorr *Akatsuki It's #JinglesEffect

[@BruhPK]

Swore that was my stomach too o.o

[@TheExecutorr]

@@Pilvenuga thanks. It's all the fault of that bloody kitten ^^

[@jimwolaver9375]

There was a game called Guild Wars wherein this got dealt with very publicly. The character Death would descend upon your character, swing his scythe through you, and you and everyone in line of sight got to watch it happen to you live. Your account was immediately confiscated with no refund. This was only possible because Guild Wars development staff commonly played the game as part of their job. If they saw it happen, they could punish on the spot with no conversation. It was very comforting to those who suffered at the hands of these @$$#o!e$.

[@deadjester]

That was fun, entertaining and, for those who may not understand the game mechanics, educational. Love your work Jingles. Keep it up. etc

[@Scarheart76]

I've played several matches both with and against this guy. He's a good teammate and a pain in the ass to fight against. :)

[@DaveKraft1]

That was an incredibly impressive victory. WELL done, Atlanta! (also one of my favorite ships).

[@twowheelfrenzy]

I really enjoyed the gameplay of Waifu. it was amazing and well played! Also The m18 hellcat is awesome. I'm very sad that I didn't see one at Bovington Tank Museum. (I didn't go on tank day)

[@Seahorn_]

BTW Jingles, thanxs for pointing out "Neptunes Inferno" was great to read, even if it was not in my native language. Currently reading "The fleet at flood tide" which I enjoy reading as well. On an off note the Hood was also a battlecruiser and it lacked the deck armor (although there were plans to re-enforce it), in 1941 it had to suffer for it.

[@HuMaNise34]

*looks at thumbnail* At least you can virtually, in real life your wifu sinks you financially....

[@alphawolf1786]

While driving you insane at the same time

[@HuMaNise34]

@@alphawolf1786 depends on your wifu, though the level of craziness is more random than lootboxes

[@alphawolf1786]

@@HuMaNise34 bruh you ain't lying on the craziness

[@HuMaNise34]

@@alphawolf1786 female friends can teach you alot.........wives are no different in that department.

[@Albertalorian]

@@HuMaNise34 IF you have enough female friends, you will enjoy being single, and the ability to go home to solo sanctuary lol.

[@oscarporras6738]

Jingles forgot to mention the Solo warrior award. It's a very rare award to see anywhere and it's been only a couple of weeks since he posted the previous one. I think we've all missed the your the last hope voice message, because it activated almost at the same time as the fireworks signal got activated with the Confederate award achievement being reached. So the seventh most damage done on an Atlanta globally, an annoying team killer reported to wargaming, a Kraken, Confederate achievement, High Caliber, Solo warrior award, the Arsonist's and the Devastating Strike achievements. Very good game for I-sank your-wifu. Congratulations!

[@lilyu2383]

28:05 Is best moment of this episode. Navy-man: Captain, it was nice serving with you. Captain: No... It was my pleasure. OPEN FIRE ! Navy-man: YES CAPTAIN !

[@SunriseReaper3]

This was a fucking epic replay. As a WoT player, I wasnt expecting to be sitting on the edge of my seat like this

[@donise8406]

Two brothers; I was playing it the other day and a team mate DD decided to go up the slot early on. Another player in some many words questioned his sanity.I replied with "He has watched too many Jingles videos" The DD replied YUP lol

[@erwinrommel1462]

Or flambass vids

[@DarkPhoenixDack125]

We just need a "Thanks to you, the community is a better place." message to appear. No info, but just enough closer.

[@onewhosaysgoose4831]

Actually Jingles, his name is "I _sunk_ your waifu", though we can all understand if you were simply correcting his land lubber errors.

[@QALibrary]

I have been on this team a number of times now - he really knows how to play this game and I think this is his best/most used ship

[@theScottishKoala]

Welcome back to world of warships with REAR Admiral Jingles ( ͡°╭͜ʖ╮͡° )

[@Handleofatleast3characters]

Excellent historical info, as usual. Keep up the wonderful videos!

[@StackableGoldMC]

At the end I thought he was going to lose than I seen his rate of fire and realized that the Colorado was done for. A really entertaining match the hole way through.

[@NJP695]

I like how his username is “i_sunk_your_waifu” but Jingles keeps calling him “I sank your waifu” Ahh jingles, don’t ever change; you might be able to properly identify the ships (unlike in world of tanks) the names will still trip you up hahahah

[@QemeH]

Random english-as-a-second-language question: Isn't "sank" the correct form? (Which is probably why Jingles defaulted to that...) At least I learned that "sunk" is the past participle, so it's either an adjective or perfect tense (i.e. "I HAVE sunk your waifu.") - while sank is past tense. So without an auxiliary verb it should be "sank" - or am I wrong somewhere here?

[@MarsJenkar]

@@QemeH You are correct; however, the name is a reference to a common misuse of "sunk" in relation to the board game Battleship (e.g. "You sunk my battleship!").

[@DragonSt3alth]

They may not be able to say what the penalty was, but they CAN say that there was consequences applied. League of Legends has done this for years, if you report someone for misbehavior in chat or in game, they review the replay and if a penalty is applied they send a message back to you saying that someone that you reported recently has had a penalty applied.(League needs to stiffen the consequences, they are way too lax)

[@CFHoneyBadger]

Jeeze, that fire rate at the end...holy cow.

[@coolcow5193]

ikr

[@williamgandarillas2185]

IRL, that was the normal reload. Wg nerfed it to 5 seconds

[@flamedphoenix84]

thank you Mr. Jingles for the update on this inconsiderate player and I hope you do this more often if you get videos on these kind of player. So we can all know about them and make them change or quit the game for good for doing this. And great video replay of Waifu as well.

[@hypshyps7427]

i dont think that data protection principles apply here - his real identity remains hidden if just account name is mentioned and so there is no breach.

[@KimwPerks]

That was a amazing replay. Thank you Jingles

[@SentientSeven]

"Data protection" is nonsense, other games like Rainbow 6 Siege & Battlefield broadcast bans region-wide, I'm sure if they can legally Wargaming can too.

[@wombat4191]

Well, European Union's new super strict data protection laws came to be year and a half back, so I'm no sure about how those affect WG's behaviour in this matter. Sure it shouldn't affect NA servers (also, I don't know how the laws are in any NA country), but maybe they have adopted uniform policies for the sake of simplicity. Not really sure would telling about an online account's ban break those laws though. Either they're not taking any risks or it provides them a good excuse not to tell because they don't want to.

[@theatagamer90]

@@wombat4191 Telling about a ban wouldn't break data privacy laws at all. Data privacy/protection laws are ment to protect your personal data and quite frankly an account name is not a form of personal data. Unless the EU is just that retarded.

[@AtotheK101]

Impressive game! Amazing to watch especially with Jingles commentary.

[@HowardMoth]

"Data protection laws"..... in the US?

[@RedXlV]

EU. World of Warships is a Russian game, but the majority of the players are in the EU. (As opposed to World of Tanks, where the majority of players are Russian.)

[@HowardMoth]

Right but the issue was sent to customer service NA. That's in Chicago, IL. Hence the joke.

[@RedXlV]

@@HowardMoth I would presume that Wargaming has the same customer service policies worldwide, because it would be simpler that way. Meaning that they'd mostly follow EU rules everywhere.

[@HowardMoth]

Actually no. While typically branches of international companies follow the same guidelines there's nothing in place to hold them to it. Case and point, you may recall the drama more than a year ago when WoT released the Chrysler and a popular community contributor negatively reviewed it. Drastic differences between how EU and NA handled the issue.

[@trims2u]

No, WG NA is the entity in charge of the NA server, and it is a distinct entity from WG (a Russian company). WG NA has to follow US, and has zero responsibility to follow EU law. And they certainly have distinctly different customer service departments, as running a single one would be a logistical accounting nightmare, trying to figure out who pays for what.

[@mrpauloacaeiro]

I love your contribution to this and other games, you are one of the most "respected" among the WG contributers and they should listen to you more. As you said this is the internet! How can WG prevent players not getting into battles against, some times, 25 or more enemies. I've experienced this situation, getting into matchs, tier 8, 9 or even 10 with players that should be playing hello kitty island instead of World of Warships. WG should "rethink" its MM base on the experience of players, but no, russian devs are always trolling us or there math is different then ours. Other thing is that they have premium ships for all thats the worst, money talks higher. To finish in style, cheaters continue to play, alot, and WG still doing nothing. Shame! Continue the good work Jingles!

[@jaceborg]

I don't see how any data protection laws are being broken by saying 'Account X was banned' as it reveals zero personal data. Also chat and in game events should be logged server side, it shouldn't be up to the players to send replays in.

[@keithfukumitsu4851]

Thanks Jingles for the breakdown on the reporting/penalty system.

[@Ensign_Cthulhu]

7:40 - the data protection laws in this case are doing far more harm than good. The twats and arseholes have IMHO abrogated their right to that protection.

[@syferpolski4344]

I'm not buying the data protection argument here. If WarThunder can list the nicknames of players who were permabanned for illegal client modifications, why wouldn't World of Warships? Nicknames are not personal data. Emails are, but you're not featuring emails. It really does smell like trying to avoid scrutiny players could apply to customer support actions Example: warthunder.com/en/news/6151-countermeasures-against-forbidden-modifications-april-en

[@GigAnonymous]

It's a bullshit answer used as an excuse not to send ANY response to tickets. This way it's impossible to say whether tickets were processed or not. Behaving like an asshole in a PUBLIC game is a PUBLIC event. By saying that X (which is a public, well-known PSEUDONYM) broke Y rules (which are public) in a particular game (which is a public event) and consequently got the sanction Z (as detailed by the aforementioned public EULA) is NOT "disclosing private information". It's being transparent. You just have to see how long it's taking the dev team to add the minimap to the list of blacklisted interactions to realize the support team, which is most likely mainly made out of underpaid temp workers who hate their job, just don't give a DAMN about your user experience. All they want to do is tell their bosses they've met their daily ticket closure quotas, and if no one can tell when they closed the ticket without even reading it it's all the better. Incidentally, it's probably the reason why they ask for a replay, even though I suspect they might have to keep the chat logs around for legal reasons anyway.

[@menofwar-os1wi]

@@GigAnonymous what the fuck are you on about, im pretty sure you dont have the slightest idea of what actually happens at wows HQ, unless you've been there, youre just assuming things and blurting them out as false facts.

[@trims2u]

@@menofwar-os1wi actually, he's spot on, given the displayed behavior pattern of WG. Unless you have another more logical explanation for the completely WRONG claims about Data Protection laws and the abysmal customer service record?

[@daveno8432]

"Data protection laws" Is just a excuse ..A poor one at that. The laws do not protect what WG is trying to say they do. Its just an excuse to not do anything.

[@FutureCanadaBlue]

A brand new video! What an awesome way to start the day; thank you Gnome Overlord!

[@silentassassin8584]

Holy shit...that's all I can really say lol. The rate of fire on that thing is insane even without the buff with AR and the special captain bonus.

[@SuperChoronzon]

Yeah, all I could say as he opened up on that last BB... Holy SHIT !!!....it's just a rain of fire...constant...and *POP* there he goes lol

[@Fadamor]

0:55 I realize this video is five years old, but isn't it Misaya_g in the New Orleans who's spamming quick commands? Glad to see you never changed, Jingles. 😄

[@marlenestockton2269]

as Apr 2022....Invexus is still playing.

[@justinglad1012]

Yeah, there were 4 M18 Hellcats that ambushed a German armored force comprised of Panzer V’s (Panthers). They used the hill as cover and they would peek over showing only the turret making them a small target. It worked great due to amazing gun depression.

[@heheheuhue6943]

1 view and 5 Comments. Gotta love the notification squad!

[@Deputybull]

I would just like to say I finally did it. I have been watching your videos Jingles for about 2 years now, and even though I am a poor public servant and never have any money because my kids get it all, I have finally started playing world of warships on my kids playstation. I was hoping that my education at your fount of knowledge would make me invincible from the start, but it took me a few games just to get basic seamanship down. I have not been brave enough yet to venture out past AI yet, I don't want to be laughed at yet. I had hopes of sending you my first replay but I doubt it will be good enough. I have managed to kill two bots in one game, which caused me to jump up on top of the grog keg and drop trou,. Hopefully in a year or two I can have one of my replays on.

[@Pcwarmachine]

Data Protection Laws? What data? Usernames? Hardly private data. Me thinks this sound more like a Wargaming Data Protection "Policy".

[@SPIRIT-117]

It's definitely on WGs end, War Thunder Devs Gaijin have a monthly (ish) ban list that they say specifically which users have been banned.

[@arkhaan7066]

The end of this video clearly demonstrates why battleships are fucking terrible to play. A half health battleship doing pretty much everything right, maneuvering changing speed etc, can’t do enough damage fast enough to kill a Atlanta with a sliver of health, and can’t take 5in gun salvoes without buckling under the assault.

[@458DESTRO]

Wargaming in a nutshell. Make excuses for not doing something multiple other games and services do. Oh that? That would ViOlAtE ThEiR pRiVaCy. It's a username in a video game Wargaming. You use them in your replay submission videos don't you? Wargaming: But.... that's different... Me: How? Wargaming: ITS JUST DIFFERENT OK!?

[@thebedknobs]

No no no !!you can't have a mortally wounded ship with such an incredibly rate of fire..doesn't make sense...??i love this game cos of the realistic consequences of damage and engagement but this is getting silly and just don't get me started on cv squadron replenishing ☹️ps great vid though thanks as always 👍🏻

[@katrinapaton5283]

I agree, especially when the Colorado's 5"/51 calibre guns, which should easily outrange the Atlanta's inferior weapons, don't even fire.

[@FeathorFerengi]

Ah, good old Error Musume. As for the first replay, I didn't know about the enabled replays. Good to know, unfortunately the Nazi I ran across in Narai won't get fucked as it's too far back and I've had a few hundred battles since then.

[@lonnieholcomb2078]

actually this video should get some golden ammo pointed his way ;)

[@InuchiyoMaeda]

He's my hero now. I used to love the Atlanta with the old CVs as I used her for plane hunting. I guess I need a lot of matches to see how it works now. :)

[@billwales4861]

5 " guns sinking Battleships, such a farce. Why I no longer play.

[@bskorupk]

Historically Small/Mid Caliber Guns had proven useless against Battleships, only when one ignores Yellow River, Tsushima, Guadalcanal, Surigao Straight. If you fire a hundred exploding shells at a Battleship's non-vital/unarmored parts in a timely manner, then a great many of the Crew will be dead, the Steering Gear, Rudder, or Propellers potentially broken, The rangefinders/optics/radio masts will likely all be smashed, and the wooden decks, secondary ammunition or anything else flammable above the waterline will burn uncontrollably, and if that fire is near the air uptakes it will render the engine rooms uninhabitable, or if it's near the Barbettes, It could set off the magazines. Battleships are strong, but in an age of modern weapons armor alone isn't enough to allow one to waltz into a fortified anchorage like a fox in a hen-house the way the CSS Virginia did at Hampton Roads (1862), and if/when Battleships get into a close-quarters fight against opponents with a higher rate of fire and torpedoes, It cannot be expected to go their way.

[@KamikazKid]

@@bskorupk Battleships are worthless in-game because their accuracy has been nerfed into the ground, getting a full broadside off at close range shouldn't be the impossible feat it is in WOWS. See HMS Warspite for further info on why they shouldn't be missing at close range. All a Battleship can do is get hit & hope to RNGesus for a citadel.

[@dennisuerling899]

@@KamikazKid , which line are you playing? To be fair, German BBs are not that accurate beyond secondary range and do tend to scatter pretty good. IJN and USN BBs do have decent accuracy at range. I haven't played any BBs in the RN line yet. That being said, RNGesus can say no, no matter how close you are and you do occasionally hit a bad RGN run where you can hit anything. My luck with shot runs the entire gambit. On the rare occasion I miss perfectly aimed shots at less than 2km. Other times I can get a citadel or two blind firing a cruiser in a smokescreen. RNGesus giveth and RNGesus taketh away.

[@bskorupk]

@@KamikazKid The main thing that annoys me with Battleships is that Basics of Survivability is a Tier 3 skill and not a Tier 1 skill, as for Accuracy long-range misses tend to force enemies of all types to scatter like ants, and although not nearly as accurate as cruisers, Battleships can be made to work properly if one keeps in mind the slightly absurd and esoteric "Age of Empires Logic" ballistics, in that if one either doesn't "target" (with the little symbol), or simply changes target after firing, the shots will artificially disperse to a greater degree than if the enemy ship is targeted for the entirety of the process, furthermore, it's harder to adjust for the fall of shot because badly aimed shots will artificially disperse more than properly aimed ones. BB's are not "useless in-game" by any stretch, but require a great deal of skill to use, unless one is trying to rush in with secondaries like an ironclad, which only works properly when done en-masse in low-mid tier battleships.

[@KamikazKid]

@@dennisuerling899 Well I'm talking all lines, you shouldn't be missing half your BB shots at 5 km, American Civil War cannons being aimed by line of sight could hit at that distance, but a Battleship with a lead computing gun sight misses half to 3/4 of its shots. That's some great historical accuracy there. I think there should be two accuracy tables for one for line of sight distance, and one for long range RNGesus due to gun dispersion.

[@GrouchierBear]

I feel compelled to point out that, while yes, Beatty's battlecruisers at Jutland didn't have the armor protection to really stand in the line of battle, the real reason two of them blew up was because they bypassed or outright removed safety measures between the guns and the magazines to increase rate of fire, allowing what would have otherwise been survivable hits to make them go boom. A third battlecruiser was saved from the same fate only by a quick command to flood the magazines.

[@TipOfTheSauce]

I'm getting déjà vu from the Good, The Bad, And The Ugly. Like if you remember what I am talking about.

[@patrickhaarz5629]

Compl3te Control which episode was that again?

[@RandomPerson_6]

@@patrickhaarz5629 If it is the one I am thinking of it would be episode 7 ( kzbin.info/www/bejne/aaKknYR5hbikqac ) which is were we "got unfair plane, he kemp bush"

[@TipOfTheSauce]

@@RandomPerson_6 Actually, this is the one I was talking about kzbin.info/www/bejne/hHuQmXmwmcmpa7s

[@nickoppedisano7225]

Thanks for this video! I had a very similar experience a couple of days ago and now I'm going to do something about it. Cheers!

[@deslth]

oh boy did I enjoy this one, I am kicking myself right now that I didn't take advantage of that opportunity when Atlanta was on sale, I'll be in the premium shop if you need me, glad I_Sunk_Your_Waifu send this one in

[@RogueCylon]

Way late here. But World of Warships are incorrectly quoting the data protection act, either through ignorance or as an excuse.

[@ELCADAROSA]

INCREDIBLE game in the Atlanta!!! Well done!

[@coreypatterson5827]

Illustrating a significant problem with data-protection laws: not enough protection for legit customers, too much protection for troublemakers. The arseholes will not be "stamped out" until we start seeing heads on pikes. Justice must be seen being done for it to have any power.

[@LiveLNXgaming]

I was in a game where someone from the enemy team was reporting there location. In team chat we talked about what the guy was doing and after about 5 minutes of it, and some of us taking advantage of that info, realized the guy was going to be a prick the whole game so like 6 of us reported him and as a team the remaining 9, yes all 9 of us unanimously, decided to throw the game. We told the enemy team and all sailed directly at them and did not fire. It was kindof amazing. This was the only time I have had that happen and it was only a tier 6 game, but still was cool to see that most people still have some sport left.

[@videowatcher621]

Fun fact: It's sometimes better to give people your broadside than nose in in the Atlanta because your bow/stern plating is actually THINNER than that of equivalent tier DDs. This means that AP shells of 203mm and above can and will overmatch your nose/stern and continue on to penetrate your still thinly-armored citadel bulkheads for massive damage. Whereas if you're lucky, they might overestimate your speed and miss your citadel entirely if you're broadside on,resulting in relatively minor overpen damage.

[@amshermansen]

4:30 - I am pretty sure there is no data protection issue here, as long as PERSONAL "real life" contact information is being shared here. If you report content on Facebook, Twitter, Steam et cetera, they will be more than happy to give you an update a few weeks later with "Thank you for reporting content that was against our TOS - It has been removed blablabla"

[@bambustech9477]

Just writing to say some things about putting in a report ticket. I think the game was called 12th sky, or something of that sort, back in the day, in the times of yore where I managed to get 3 or so people banned (presumably at least) as they were nowhere to be soon shortly after the tickets were sent in. the sale system in 12th sky: (iirc that, that was the name of the game) the sale system was rather poor. you were allowed to have 2 accounts, and one would certainly want to do that if you wanted to both play the game and sell your loot at the same time. Trading was done by setting up a trading booth somewhere on whatever server you wanted, but one would probably use the designated trading world. the booth had very limited space, give it a name (usually what kind of stuff you were selling), and wait for someone to stop by and check your booth the old fashioned way by actually moving his toon to check out your booth. I place mine next to an npc dealing in symbol stuff, although actual use of the npc was a mystery, but there were other guys selling at that npc as well, so, a good place to set up shop. what happened: I kept getting a ton of something I think was called: "symbols", and my competitors sold them for 10 silver a piece. I had a ton of them, so I sold mine for 7.5 silver a piece. they decided to match my price, and I just lowered it to 5 silver a piece. they then decided to contact me to try and convince me of selling them at 10 silver a piece, more money for me if I did. but as I was swimming in symbols and with nothing to use them for, I simply didn't have time to wait for someone to buy mine when our prices matched. as their negotiations failed, they then decided to simply use lack of physics and place their booth on top of mine, meaning noone could interact with my booth, since their booth would be on top. usually in games you're not allowed to disrupt other people's gaming experience, which they now did. I informed them that they were breaking the rules, they didn't believe me, and I sent in a ticket to support with screenshots of the chat, and of them placing their booth on mine. and the next day or so, both guys were nowhere to be seen for about 3 days. when they returned, they kept at it and called me various things and I sent in another ticket. didn't see them for a week or so after that. some other guy (from same guild) then decided to spent his gaming time advertising that noone should buy my wares cause I got normal people banned. I informed him why they were banned, but complete disbelief, as the 2 "would never do such a thing." I told him I would report him too if he continued, with no result, reported him and he disappeared for a few days. when he returned he called me various things, he then disappeared for a week or so after sending in another ticket to support. the first 2 guys returned to the game, asking me politely to raise my prices so they could actually sell their symbols, if only I'd cooperate. I explained why I did as I did, but they said they had no issues selling theirs, until I arrived. unconvinced as I couldn't get rid of mine, and certainly not in a pace that was even remotely close to me gathering them. and I could keep up with my personal demands at 7.5 silver, occasionally had to resolve to dropping my price for a day to 5 silver. told them they could do the same, as that was what I wanted at the least for them, but they didn't want to do that and negotiations went on for several days, I sent in a new ticket for harassment since they kept pestering me, despite asking them to stop, and they disappeared ones more. the name caller returned and was furious that his 2 friends ones again couldn't play, and he too, would later come to share the same fate, cause of the games harassment rules. about a week or so later, I decided to quit the game, as I had noone to play with and was literally feeling utterly lonely with noone to chat to and noone to guide me and help with difficult tasks, should I have need of it. whether they got perma ban or just a month or more, I do not know, but my remaining days were peaceful and quiet and with a prosperous business, unable to keep up with demand, now that I suddenly was the only guy seelling them (at least on the trade world) --------- in The Settlers Online, I got a ban by a moderator who thought I was trolling the help channel (admittedly, I asked a ridicouless question of how long it would take to make 500 million fish food (this was before fish farms were a thing in the game (which just made fish from nothing) and couldn't do the math myself). I don't know how long I was banned, but I sent a ticket to support and the next work day, I recieved an ingame mail from the moderator with a very polite apology for the undeserved ban. of course, this would very much be up the the guys in charge whether they want to enforce their rules, some companies couldn't care less. (Cough Cough Jagex Cough Cough Runescape Cough Cough) Blizzard comes to mind, the game all the potty mouths play(ed?). according to their rules you are to be polite and thus not swear. sending in ticket after ticket has given no result what so ever of people being overly abusive at the word game of the potty mouths. basically if you're not making actual threats to harm the guy in real life, you're all good. you will keep seeing them, until you block each and everyone of the guys toons. but with millions of players and probably several thousands of potty mouths to block, multiplied by the amount of toons each guy has, I'll just go ahead and call a GG. last words: anyways, that's it from me. sorry for the very long rant. but sending a support ticket might actually do something, even if you don't see the actual end result of it. unless of course you should happen to share a similar story as mine. if you usually spot the guy the same place 24/7 doing the same stuff, and you report him, and suddenly, you don't see them for several days or more, well, most likely, the ticket has had an effect. and if he is never to pop up again, well, time to party! if you've read all this: Thank you very much! well worth the effort ! and have a splendid day ! take care, and remember to stay hydrated!

[@Ian84ish]

Gave up on WOW, because of the toxic comment section, the last time I played thanked a team mate for supporting and providing a smoke screen and half the team interpreted it that I was attacking the person, as well as the the general A-holes whom take the game very seriously FYI I was a potato battleship driver love the videos Jingles

[@FinlayDaG33k]

in LoL, you get a message that a player you've recently reported got penalized. They don't say what penalty (and if you reported multiple people, you can only guess which player it might be) but they at least say: "ye, we've looked into it and you're right"

[@Wikkus]

That was like a Lolanta masterclass. Properly enjoyed that.

[@Bullet4MyEnemy]

Gaijin Entertainment publish their WarThunder ban lists with each ban wave, so if you think you’ve encountered, and reported a cheater/hacker/etc. you can check for them on the list. So either they’re in breach of data protection - which wouldn’t actually surprise me tbh, or War Gaming could at least publish lists in a similar fashion.

[@harrisonblake1978]

In addition to the Atlanta going to the bottom at about noon, it's sister ship the Juneau, went to the bottom about 12 hours later due to taking it's 2nd torpedo of the day in approximetly about the same place as the 1st torpedo hit.

[@moreteaplease8942]

Huh, I did not realize data protection laws applied to fictitious characters. The player "name" is only the name of their in-game character. I haven't read GDPR in its entirety, but I would be very surprised if they included IGNs as a part of identity. I'd think when a player is permabanned, it would be completely legit to advertise that fact to the injured parties, as they never knew or would know that player's actual identity. I'd also point out that "on the Internet" there's plenty of examples of publicizing the consequences of bad actions. Forum software routinely labels the status of members who have misbehaved as "Banned" on their posts, and also replace bad post body content with labels like "This post has been deleted for being against the TOS" without hiding the identity of the poster.

[@theextratank7792]

More Tea Please I have played a game in which there were monthly announcements containing a list of banned people, cheaters and the like. I wonder if Asian policies are different to WG NA’s American policies in a way that allows the reporting of singular identities to the public?

[@outofafrica5621]

Hi Jingles , thanx for all the uploads especially the warships....myself on PS4 thanks also helping with how to play on the Legends ....

[@aciarduce]

ACTUALLY JINGLES, the Lyon's share of the damage was in fact, done by the Lyon. ^,^

[@ТиммиБарч-й1ш]

Wow! That Atlanta captain. That was awesome!

[@fq3530]

In LoL if a person you reported gets banned you get a message along the lines of “A player you recently reported has had a punishment applied to their account. Thank you.” If that was implemented without any specifics just that something happened I think that would be a better way to show that WG is actually doing stuff.

[@Bistinglolwut]

Also in csgo and tf2

[@boomslang3245]

I remember this match, I was the Ryujo that he kept spotting for enemy team.

[@johnzgamez810]

Yeah, but remember that the us navy did give a spanking to at least one of the Japanese ships via the U.S.S. Washington. Washington is the sister ship of the North Carolina, so the same guns, 16’/50 caliber Mk. VI guns (I think, correct me if I’m wrong). I believe it was the third battle of Savo island, might be the second. Anyways, Japanese battleship Kirishima and the ships with her were on an escort role for the 38th infantry division, taking it to reinforce the troops at Guadalcanal and retake Henry field. They were intercepted by the U.S.S. Washington, U.S.S. South Carolina and I believe 9 other ships made up of cruisers and destroyers. The South Carolina and the cruisers and destroyers engaged the enemy head on, taking a hell of a lot of fire and damage. The Washington, which had broken off before the battle, snuck around the island, unseen, and engaged the Kirishima. Paddled her. The Washington doesn’t even take a hit. She never took a shell to her main armor. Closest thing was when her radio antenna was clipped off by a stray Japanese costal artillery shell. But, this is actually a really interesting story because this makes the U.S.S. Washington the only battleship to sink another battleship in a one on one fight. I really wish that Washington state had bought her instead of allowing her to get scrapped, because I’d love to visit Seattle one day and just look out into Puget sound and see a battleship just floating there. But noo! They didn’t have the dock yards! And then a year after she got scrapped, they expanded them to a point in which they COULD hold a battleship. GAH!

[@Cuilieann]

My Greatest memory in wows was getting into a less than 1km knife fight in my Atlanta with another Atlanta.... Glorious...

[@lewisirwin5363]

28:07 ♪♫ It's the burning rain! it's a piece of my pain! Burning raaiiin, turn it off so we can live again! ♪♫

[@Photec]

It's strange that no feedback is allowed, as other games do give feedback regarding some cases. I had one player headshot me and my team of 3 with no LOS and recoil in PUBG, and after we had reported some time went by before we received a ticket telling us that the player had been permabanned from the game. Only happened once, but it was immensely satisfying.

[@verfluchteblume]

It's always a good feeling blowing up that pesky Atlanta spamming HE at your BB.