World of Warships - Supercharged

[@adamantu]

Chat at the beginning (1:15) had me laughing instantly: "Let's break from the norm and form a 24 person konga line"

[@DD-mp1kl]

that's how you know it's the NA server.

[@GrumpyIan]

@samu1040 samu1040 oddly yes, though the NA server on WoT is the exact opposite.

[@DD-mp1kl]

@samu1040 samu1040 i am not sure about less toxic but friendly banter seems abnormally common.

[@hedning003]

@samu1040 samu1040 the main reason for this is that on NA server,every1 talks the same language,on the european server,i belive most of it isnt actualy a language at all..just people slipping over the keyboard..but for some reason english is obviously to difficult

[@onanthebarbarian9883]

@@hedning003 >>but for some reason english is obviously to difficult

[@Scp4217ContainTheBismarck]

"The bestest exploding pixel boat game on the market" -Mighty Jingles

[@Roverswelsh]

I got the advert for the 'bestest exploding pixel boat' game just before this :)

[@gkgameplaycz]

what about WarThunder tho?

[@breakafreak]

@@gkgameplaycz warthunder naval is ass

[@piazzollalucagordon4149]

Is that "exploding" or "exploiting"? :D

[@gkgameplaycz]

@@breakafreak naval is fun

[@themacker894]

"For playing a free to play game for free in a ship he didn't have to buy." Gosh Jingles, are you trying to tell us something?

[@Axonteer]

DATS A PADDLIN

[@niels19974]

Didn't really notice it at all? Is he upset at wargaming or something? /s

[@GrockleTD]

Just saying something he really could have been saying this entire time.

[@wongjefx980]

He quit the Development Community….he stop play WoW?

[@Alucard-gt1zf]

@@niels19974 yeah, most of wow content creators are pissed at war gaming

[@ClydeThaMonkey]

"It's kinda sealclubbing" Well, the ship I'm looking at is the USS Clubson, a highly popular club used for seals. So, it's not "kinda" sealclubbing, it's the definition of sealclubbing lol

[@vince5456]

At this age, is Clemson still a sealclubbing ship?

[@Cailus3542]

@@vince5456 God yes, of course it is. Clemson is a freaking monster in the right hands.

[@vince5456]

well, that guns is terrifying, but that detection range.

[@chriswalker7506]

Not just any seals, but baby seals.

[@gerhardtroos2437]

but have you seen the nice fur coats that baby seal pelts make?

[@joshtard1111]

Thanks for the feature Jingles! It was an exciting match for sure!

[@GrouchierBear]

Actually, many Clemsons served well into the thirties before being reserved the first time. Of course many others went from being commissioned to straight into reserve in the twenties, which proved useful when seven of them ran aground and another forty or so had faulty boilers. There were plenty of reserve Clemsons available to replace them.

[@rkentblackwood]

Might I recommend the "Destroyermen" series by Taylor Anderson? It's an alternate history/time travel series about a Clemson class chased by the battlecruiser version of the Amagi in an alternate earth fighting mean lizards and whatnot. The audiobooks are particularly good.

[@salt6]

@@rkentblackwood Google Point Honda.

[@tacothe13th30]

@@rkentblackwood Love that series, my favorite series I've read for definite sure (also, Amagi is/was already a battlecruiser fyi)

[@martinmoffit8950]

@@salt6 I used to work there. Ugh, so many rocks and such a remote location. It's a wonder so many survived.

[@rkentblackwood]

@@tacothe13th30 I thought the hull was used to build a carrier.

[@DaMickLNP]

Sometimes I'd rather have bots on my team at higher tiers than actual people...

[@slavkovalsky1671]

100% less toxic and often smarter. too!

[@2rslvl126]

​@@slavkovalsky1671 WG has smarter bots than that exists in Co-op and that other game mode that WG said they'd develop more .. but, didn't because "not enough people were playing the same boring 5 missions over and over", and now acts like the SyFi tv channel - canceling which is a good idea - but they won't do it without an exceptional profit.

[@treeherder42]

@@2rslvl126 I think I remember seeing something where wg said they do have incredible bots, but they don't use them because as part of the game things like concealment don't matter to bots (the server always knows where you are, where your shells are going to land ect). They can also have perfect aim which is another problem, if they always know where you are and where you are shooting plus can aim at any level wg want while simultaneously tracking every player.... So basically the bots can have anywhere from "ram only" to "none will survive my wrath" levels of power already. The problem is people don't like losing to bots. Personally I'd love some operations with vs bots that are as good as what most players believe they are.

[@xanatax1844]

@@treeherder42 they should package up a few bots into “personas” - like, give them names, some strengths & weaknesses, a couple prefered strategies each. so each named-bot has a unique style, some are stronger than others. only allow one of each “named bot” in each match … players are more likely to respond. 👍 generic all-bots-behave-the-same is lame. 🤷‍♀️

[@xanatax1844]

oh, btw. the bots don’t have to be allowed access to all the server data. it’s possible, and more fair, to restrict bots to only see the same data a player would see, … like, shooting at players that aren’t even spotted would be silly. … but of course, for bots with the same data players get, *perfect* aim is still possible at a target that is spotted.

[@Aabergm]

I just discovered you on The Operations Room about the Persian Gulf..

[@mikkodoria4778]

Wait, Jingles is ww2 veteran?

[@shp27493]

@@mikkodoria4778 gulf war

[@cookiesupervisor2211]

@@mikkodoria4778 Yes he was Commander on Warspite ...

[@neilove8897]

Please post a link so I can find it, thank you.

[@Aabergm]

@@neilove8897 kzbin.info/www/bejne/enXJdaGQbKuckMk&ab_channel=TheOperationsRoom

[@systematicrisk]

I remember one game in my Clemson where my team's final survivor was a bot. Embarrassing. Still, it's a fun little destroyer with a 6 gun, 6 torp broadside at tier 4.

[@christophersmith9074]

I had a game like that too once, last two ships were cv's and there's was using full squad and ours was not we lost and I stopped playing for a bit .edit its probably should point out both CV's were both bots

[@JETZcorp]

Happens to me all the time at T4, because usually the games are 80-90% bots. I try and make a point to focus the player-controlled enemy BB first because he's the biggest threat, and he usually does the same to me. So there are many occasions when it's just bots vs bots groping around like blind idiots until the timer runs out.

[@christophersmith9074]

@@JETZcorp and raming each other

[@thefortemfortispandorian8333]

The best is when I'm playing a co op battle and have a carrier per team, with both being bots

[@jeremyesh5969]

Actually Jingles, each ship in the cap circle has it's own capture point counter. So even though your teammate in the big stupid battelship is getting shot, you will still be making progress on captureing the point, as you can see in the video.

[@psychoshy211]

What jingles is trying to explain is that when there are two ships in a cap circle, the capture points for both are going up by 1.5ish the amount as if there was just one ship, so if one of those ships is being reset by getting shot, then it takes longer to cap with two ships than if it was just one stealthy ship that hasn't been spotted, as then the points would be going up by .75. Those numbers aren't exact by the way they are just an example.

[@BzhToine]

Point is that the cap is shared between the ships. Meaning that if on ship is shot at, for axemple a BB, it can entirely reseat the cap while the second ship, a destroyer is unspoted.

[@Talguy21]

And it's been tested that a percentage of point resets do, in fact, come out of every ship in the circle anyway. So while you WILL make net forward progress, it is actually slower for two ships with one under constant fire than for one ship capping uncontested.

[@jeremyesh5969]

@@Talguy21 ok I didn't know that. Thanks for clarifying.

[@m00t]

@@BzhToine This is not true. The BB's contribution is reset, not the DD's. This is clearly evident in the video.

[@packatk7431]

This is how I remember WoWS... good tactics, evenly matched teams, challenging but not too challenging... good fun all around. Thanks for the video Jingles.

[@stevenmoore4612]

I actually like low tier battles. You should do more of them. Most replays are upper tier so it’s good to see a change.

[@grandadmiralraeder9608]

"you're never going to save yourself by shooting aircraft down at tier 4. ever." -Jingles. UNLESS YOU'RE AGAINST A HERMES WHOSE AIRCRAFT HAVE SUCH LOW HP THAT EVEN DESTROYERS WILL GET A FEW PLANE KILLS AT TIER 4

[@dclark142002]

Hermes has the MOST hp planes at tier 4...just FYI.

[@Tearnofear]

Thats not what Jingles meant though^^ Could it be that it takes longer to shoot down a Aircraft than it takes for the CV to "get a new one from the Store"?

[@pallen2980]

My first thought when seeing this video: "I thought Jingles was fed up with Warships, perhaps he sold out." My thought after watching: "Nope, salty Jingles is clearly pissed"

[@mohammedsadam8747]

lol i thought the same

[@EATSxBABIES]

Jingles decides to dive back into War Thunder last week and this week they do a huge economy rebalance that makes the game much more enjoyable. Coincidence? I think not!

[@RonM.]

When you're feeling like literal sh*t irl, but then a Jingles video comes out.

[@cookiesupervisor2211]

... are you working for WG ?...

[@mikeschwartz1764]

Feel better bro

[@Lemuron01]

I urge you to find something more profound than a jingles video to keep your mood up with. If you're in a bad place, try and have the courage to change your situation. Sometimes it has to get worse before it gets better, often times a lot worse.. but it does get better, if you are open to it

[@timeforgottenprince8271]

I haven't played WoWs in a long time, but I still remember having a 16 point captain for the Clemson due to how good it was. Before, it could stealth fire, but even after the spotted after firing mechanic, it still a total of 8 guns when fully upgraded. True, it can only really fire 6 guns at most at any given target, but that is still 6 guns, and while it can't stealth fire torpedoes normally, if you are running away and ships are chasing you, you can stealth torp those ships, and since those ships are to the rear, you can easily get all 12 torpedoes off in their directions.

[@mathiasfischbach4843]

Regarding AA at Tier IV, the dutch "De Ruyter" has a pretty nasty AA, especially with it's fighter consumable. While it's not enough to repel an air attack, it most definately hurts planes. A lot.

[@mikexhotmail]

Yup ,a battle group of 2 cruisers and 2BB is almost invincible for air attack on Tier4.

[@Dodusification]

I have been enjoying De Ruyter for the past 3 weeks. its a fun ship to play

[@enolastraight4829]

Yubari also has pretty good AA. I personally enjoy that ship. The only problem is armor made of wet tissues.

[@billwales4861]

Still blows my mind that DD guns can finish off BB's. OR, that a ship in smoke can see every ship within his range because some spotter can give every detail about every ship the spotter sees and not just show it on the mini map like todays technology, never mind in WW2. That aside, a very well fought battle there Supercharged.

[@lunsmann]

Arcade game = DD guns can kill BB. Simulation = DD guns? What DD guns? Oh, those noise makers over there ..... LOL.

[@jmoore4477]

My head canon is the same as table top RPGs, hitting zero HP isn't dying, but the inability to fight back. In WoWS in my mind, hitting zero HP isn't necessarily a fatal blow, could be enough damage was sustained to the crew that the ship can no longer stay in the fight. And if I were a betting man I'd put my money on a 10cm HE shell doing quite a bit to an AA turret, super structure command and support rooms, surface-mounted electronics and fire suppression systems....

[@captbumbler5356]

A great lesson in how to win at low tier matches by using your brains. well done Supercharged

[@danepickering6252]

Hey Jingles! Watched Operations Room latest video and loved your recall of a critical point in the Gulf War you were involved in!

[@michaelsmith6420]

I thought he was tackled and spent most of the Gulf War on his face?

[@briancreegan827]

13:40. Enemy Miyogi uses “WASD hax” unfair game play ! Well done Supercharge.

[@mccorpsecorpse]

"Citation required" tag needed on that claim that shooting a BB in a cap circle also resets the DD's cap progress. I've never seen evidence of that. I have definitely seen evidence that failing to find and shoot the hidden DD will mean that no matter how much you blast the thing you can see, the cap will make its way inexorably to being capped by the thing you can't. And that happens here! at 10:15, when the BB starts getting hit, at first it almost doubles the time left to cap-- because the BB lost all its cap points, roughly the same amount as the Clemson (they entered the cap at about the same time). Then later, the successive hits continue to increase the timer, as the BB loses its (newly acquired, fewer) cap points again and again. But by the end of it, the BB getting hit is affecting the timer almost negligibly. Why? Because the Clemson has 95% of the accumulated cap points. And at 11:05, the Clemson gets a *solo* cap flag. Because it has virtually all of the cap points.

[@CP-tm7be]

Yep, I think Jingles is thinking that the cap progress bar was ONLY for the DD.

[@wretchedexcess1654]

That was a good one, very exciting! Nice pick Overlord Jingles, Sir.

[@2020heinsite]

My first Kraken in WoWS was in a Clemson and it happened on this very map. So this video brings back a very pleasant memory. Thanks, Jingles!

[@jaym1244]

OMG! So I know you haven't said anything about stopping the WOW videos, but with everything going on and you resigning from the CC, I was afraid you were going to nix the WOW videos. I don't play the game but I absolutely love these videos! For some reason I don't watch the WOT or the WT vids, but these ship battles are just so interesting and your commentary is captivating. Love ya Jingles, please don't stop making these!

[@Irfan87]

The Bot AI are fucking good at torp dodging though lol.

[@jcorbett9620]

They are indeed. Acceleration that would humble a supercar, stopping on a sixpence and a rudder shift time of 90 deg in 0.01 seconds - or at least, that's how it appears :-)

[@mikehomant7806]

Try torping without a lock on the bot. I get a lock, see the gray line, then take the lock off and fire the torps. It seems to work better that way.

[@lunsmann]

Stay undetected and your torps have a good chance of hitting. The AI bots always react immediately you are spotted and turn in toward you (avoiding those torps you have already sent) and charge you down relentlessly.

[@chimpboy12345]

That's because bots cheat. ;) They turn as soon as torps are launched, regardless of spotting. Also if you're a BB with HE loaded bots will show you broadside and turn in as soon as you switch to AP. You don't even have to fire, just switch ammo and watch what they do.

[@jmoore4477]

@@chimpboy12345 While there absolutely is a sloppy coding issue server-side with bots knowing everyones position, I can't blame them for coding smarter bots to not expose broadsides when spotted by large calibre guns. Would you stay sailing broad if big guns were aimed at you? You don't know whats loaded, but you have an instinct.

[@firstnamelastname8058]

I hope the "ship I didn't have to pay for" Meta sticks around.

[@Axonteer]

bro do you even paddle?

[@firstnamelastname8058]

@@Axonteer My cat's name is Mittens!

[@andreasmuller4666]

WUHU something good again. FInally Also, actschually Jingles, the Clemson is considered the best T4 DD if not one of the best T4 ships in total. Our main character provided the visual example why that thing is THE seal clubbers choice boat in T4, heck her nick name is CLUBson.

[@henryrodgers7386]

I always appreciate a base-game vehicle that eats premiums. I'd play WOWS, but my computer is Ye Olde Potatoe.

[@TheDeadbone1961]

Thanks for showcasing a Tier IV; the lower tiers are the most fun :)

[@petresko1041]

I approve of this WG premium unpromoting!

[@Alexzander19736]

With the commentary from Jingles, it's always a pleasure to watch!

[@Thermalions]

I think after that unload on WG by Jingles, there can't be any salt left in the whole of the UK.

[@janhgh3400]

Better get mining then...

[@gwtpictgwtpict4214]

@@janhgh3400 Not a problem, just keep digging in the existing holes in Cheshire.

[@Rakee007SL]

Thank you soo much for the video Jingles, low tier matches and tips for advancing players really helps, please if you get more like this with IGN DDs or Soviet BBs please do a commentary. Love the content. Cheers...!!

[@variableknife4702]

A great effort. The rewards do somewhat show why higher tiers get played; you get more stuff even if you do badly.

[@hughleiper9518]

Need to make a tech tree "only" king of the seas now. Where you can't use spend to play. The grassroots efforts would immediately overtake the KOS tournament.

[@geoffreyrichardson8738]

Glad to see your still giving it to the man

[@thomasmeyer389]

I was driving the Gangut. I've now accomplished my WoW ultimate goal: minor fame (or infamy) in a Mighty Jingles video.

[@rododendron85]

who here remembers +/- 4 tier matchmaking in WoT

[@VladMcCain]

How about t10 matches with 1 med tank and 1 artillery per side?

[@Dodusification]

Unrelated to the CC exodus, I have been playing T4 for the past 3 weeks and it is so much fun/stress free i am not sure when I will give that up.

[@destroier920]

@The Mighty Jingles I just noticed that on the Wikipedia page for HMS Brazen (F91), under trivia, it lists you being a radio operator on her during the Gulf war. "Radio Operator 2nd Class Paul Charlton, during the Iraqi air attack would go on to start the successful KZbin Channel "The Mighty Jingles"[7]." Seems like there are dedicated saltminers out there who are also Wiki editors. XD

[@mikerifraf183]

Finally, he has returned!! I am happy to be bathed in our gnome overlords true salty presence once again.

[@iflystuff1]

Oh for crying out loud Jingles. The Gangut couldnt turn south because he would never get out alive. He kept the island to his left protecting him from the Myogi allowing him to bow tank the other gangut and simultaneously keeping him protected from the Belefont

[@thomasmeyer389]

I was driving the Gangut. You summed it up very well. Thanks!

[@bwalla50]

I agree that very often the bots at tier 4 are often better than the players. If I end up as the only human player in a game, I almost have to sink 6 or 7 ships to have a chance of my team winning. The enemy bots almost always seem smarter than my bots. I'm sure the answer is in a loot box somewhere. Keep up the good work, Mighty J.

[@xanatax1844]

thank you for featuring a low-tier / free-to-play ship! 💜👍 this is how I play! 🥰

[@novemberbravo7769]

I actually really enjoyed the lower tier videos. Maybe not tier 2/3 but tier 4/5/6 are always my favourite

[@luisnunes3863]

Got to say I was looking forward to having a weekly War Thunder video for a while...

[@johnpatz8395]

This reminds me of the early days of War Thunder, even once the started introducing jet fighters, I used to love jumping in the level 0 biplanes and taking on the world with them. Yes they were slow, and didn’t climb well, but what they could do well was dive, turn, and run around at low altitudes. There were few things more enjoyable than having someone in a high tier aircraft roll in on me, expecting and easy kill, only for me to lead them down to the ground, easily turn around inside them and shot them down as they raged!

[@johanseinen8245]

The Isokaze isn't as dangerous as it was 'back in the day' because of the torpedo speed nerf it got.

[@loudub814]

I like the fact that this player has been farming Krakens and double strikes but he forgot WG does not give flags anymore for those activities!

[@mikelewis7405]

Super comment from Jingles. I have been considering joining WoW for several months but I wanted to learn all I could about it first. Jingle provided a lot of info which made me decide against it. Mostly I wanted a game that was realistic which WoW appeared to be at first -BUT- I was very put off by the total lack of historical battles, the mix of opposing fleets and the very unrealistic maps. I know of no sea battle in WW2 fought in such narrow waters (this is something from WoT!) I hope the issues Jingles pointed out are resolved but I will not join WoW in any case.

[@Dem0nActual]

Anyone else waiting for "That could be considered good, that could be considered bad, that could be considered ugly."? Jingles! Missed opportunity.

[@maineiacman]

"Impossible to stealth torpedo with the clemson" WOW Console: Clemson is tier 3 with 4.6KM Detect and 6.5km torps.

[@jmoore4477]

Everyone knows consoles need handicaps. Aim assist, unbalanced numbers, significantly less recoil on weapons... and some still say controller is the superior input device.

[@maineiacman]

It would help if the all the WOW Console devs weren't retarded.

[@Alucard-gt1zf]

@@jmoore4477 I would rather have wow be exactly the same on console as on PC rather than the bullshit wow legends is

[@robgraham5697]

Always fun to watch a good player in action. Especially when skill count for more than your wallet.

[@ZGryphon]

To be fair, _Clemson_ had a better shot at a service career than a number of her _hundred and fifty-five_ sister ships, many of which went straight from sea trials to mothballs. Which I guess is the kind of thing that happens when you build hundreds of ships in anticipation of the Great War's 1919 naval campaign and then the armistice happens in 1918. On the other hand, it means the Navy had loads of them just lying around in a drawer somewhere to replace the seven of them that managed to run aground one after the other while attempting to sail from San Francisco to San Diego in 1923. And you thought lemming trains only happened in online games...

[@capthappy8884]

Couple years ago I argued the Clemson pound for pound was the most Op tech line ship in the game! Ah....good times:)

[@ColoradoStreaming]

That is the problem with it. You get good at the Clemson and think the game is too easy so you move up to the Nicholas and get slaughtered trying to do the same tactics.

[@capthappy8884]

@@ColoradoStreaming yeah, def a drop off in relative power thru the Benson. But the fletcher is still very strong all around in a comparable way. I like the gearing less than the fletcher, but I moved on long ago to the jutland, daring, and vampire for my "all around DD" go to.

[@robbieburtt5942]

Well played Super charged. Nice to see players out there focused on getting wins for their undeserving teammates! No one should have to carry this hard.

[@danielhartland3737]

Love your cameo/story in the operation rooms latest video. Totally unexpected

[@serafine666]

USS Clemson was actually a pretty big deal at the time of its creation as the strongest combination of stability, speed, firepower, and torpedo power. It was knocked off its pedestal by the creation of IJN Fubuki whereupon everyone raced to make their own Fubuki and that is probably the point at which Clemson and the rest of its class were mothballed, because they were superseded by events although they were still decent ships (thus why they were un-mothballed when WW2 began).

[@serafine666]

12:28 That's also how it is in WoT. If you have three tanks in the cap circle and one gets shot, the bar gets reset for all of them.

[@johnbowen5336]

Heh. I had a stellar Clemson game at T4 the other day. If you really want to avoid bots, division up. It weights the matchmaker toward live opponents.

[@xel1206]

Small addition to your statement around 13:15 - the enemy Clemson may or may not have a 10 Point captain. But it ALSO didnt use a camouflage. No wonder it could be outspotted by everone and everything.

[@NeilRoy]

Wow, nicely played, and loved your commentary.

[@mungmungie]

The thing about Bots in Tier 4 is that some of them play as stupid as a sack of hammers, but some are damn near perfect. The "Perfectbots" show up in a couple of predictable places, and are capable of firing torps or shooting at you beyond the range that ship should be capable of. While I have dealt with this by using islands (upon 1st contact), there's also the element of surprise, where an island can torpedo you. Wargambling denies that this is possible. "Friendly" bots at Tier 4 are like torpedoes--they're no one's friend. They will block you, and before the Teamkill penalty was changed, they would deliberately connect with any torps launched. If you kill too many Bots in a co-op game, be sure that you will suffer a ridiculously ignominious death in a subsequent game. I'm convinced that vindictiveness is programmed right in there. And yes, the jump from Tier 4 to tier 5 is significant. I don't know under what circumstances this should be possible, but after a game where I was detonated very close to the spawn point, I gave up and sold off my newly-acquired Tier 5 ships. Wargambling denies that this is possible. Nothing to learn there. Between aircraft carriers, and seal-clubbing by obviously superior players in random games and questionable scenarios with Bots in co-op games, I have limited myself at Tier 4 co-op games for the most part. There really are some good games going on there, and there is room to be creative. And dare I say it? There is still a tiny niche left where some fun can be had.

[@khalidgagnon8753]

That was a CARRY...... Such a CARRY.....

[@ChIGuY-town22_]

Just woke up, and there's no need video from our gnome overlord...this is going to be a long day.

[@gernhard.reinholdsen]

I have all tech lines grinded to tier 7, but T4/5 still is my favorite tier to play on and against. Maybe it just triggers the nostalgia from when I started the game. So many fun ships to play as well though, Clemson and Swietlana only two of them. I really enjoyed the König back then. Might take it for a ride once again soon.

[@TndX]

@15:18 Jingles: The aa guns of the Clemson is just the XO farting in the general direction of the attacking aircraft.

[@lunsmann]

I thought it was the cook throwing potatoes at them?

[@JH-mr2pn]

For the conversation topic around 11:45, regarding capping - While it is a little silly your own capping progress is reset, as I understand it the time you've spent in the cap, when hit, is what is reset. If you have 20 seconds to go, and the bb behind you has been in the cap for 10 seconds, then 10 seconds is added to the timer if the bb is hit. While this can be frustrating for the destroyer captain, it's also probable that the bb's presence is a) keeping ships from closing and discovering the dd, b) as seen, provided the dd stays in cap, no matter how many times the bb is reset, eventually you get the cap.

[@n0us.]

When you started talking about wining with two caps even behind on points I was like "Oh wait I need to turn the score timer mod back on. The update removed the mods and I guess I forgot that one." IT NO LONGER CAN BE USED NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

[@siriusczech]

I hate that one too, hope they will fix it soon

[@Tomcoma2832]

Great video!

[@jerry250ify]

I remember intentionally divisioning with T5s and T6s to be able to face T7s in this thing. Killing Nagatos and Colorados for the lols in my little Clemson. Nothing funnier in the world when you pull it off right

[@Ziimpux]

Nothing related to the video at all. But I've been follow you since like the War Thunder beta so like 2012. And I have been following The Operation Room for some time now and I absolutely loved your little cameo in his latest video! And the Gnome Abroad series are so interesting to listen at! :)

[@trickponystudios]

I hate to say this Jingles but there are more than a few times when the bots in T10 co-op are better than the players.

[@nigeldeforrest-pearce8084]

Excellent and Outstanding!!! Thank You!

[@pyrokine1868]

I think Jingles himself mined more salt on this one than all of us 🤣🤣

[@marty9690]

WOT capture area is just a timed thing for all, it comes down quicker if more tanks (max3) are in it but it only takes a hit on one of them to reset it a bit. Hence why in clan battles you protect the first 3 tanks in the area so the enemy can't reset the cap.

[@ysdnsingh]

Very well explained Jingles!

[@limmn3658]

I'm learning much from this vid. Thanks.

[@joshuamccormick5497]

He doesn’t even have the dual gun mounts upgrade, if he did he would be able to bring 6 guns (3 turrets) to bear at any time. The Clemson is a monster

[@42meep13]

15:30 Oh jingles never change. Clemson has more than just a 76mm AA gun. It has two .50 caliber machine guns too :p

[@robandcheryls]

An old military saying “Never interrupt the enemy, when they are fking up”

[@DannyHeywood]

When are they introducing Jets and Infantry to World of Warships? is it January?

[@gromlek8327]

Love the content, salt included.

[@Stragoh]

Good ol clemson, i always use the superfast reloading shorter range torps on that

[@pcinvictus]

You rarely ever see bots at tier 5, it's even fairly uncommon at T4 unless it's off hours. As far as it being seal clubbing, not really. Tons of long time players prefer mid tiers because it's a helluva lot less toxic than tier 10. These days if anything it's usually a disadvantage because of the constant uptiering you get.

[@slavkovalsky1671]

yeah, toxicity, and TX CVs, and too many daka spammers... Just sitting in smoke, melting enemy ships one by one. OK, smart enough to move every now and then, but still, where's the fun in that? On the upside, I finally ran into a couple of SCCC players who were just having fun instead of being toxic dicks to everyone. And a pleasant TVII game that was.

[@ColoradoStreaming]

I might have to go back and start playing lower tiers again. I have grinded up to the Benson but the chat is always toxic and the playstyle demands perfection or death which gets stressful after a long day of work. The hard thing is you need to play Mahan or Benson to stealth torp and the Benson is slow as hell and the detection is rough.

[@kenrodmelrocity4241]

Red team must have been going nuts in chat at the Bellerophon not capping. Seems like after killing the Langley it had enough time to cap B and then at least get on C to stop any more points increase by Supercharged's team. Just over 6 minutes elapsed between the time he killed the Langley and the end of the match.

[@Seluecus1]

TBF, Jingles... their CV was in the process of retreating.

[@chuckw1113]

Whil I normally play the Tier IX Fletcher and Constellation, I have a Tier IV Clemson that I enjoy playing as well. I have it configured with the better hull, torpedoes and Fire Control, plus the 102mm/50 Mk 9 twin mounts. The twin mounts somewhat offset the lack of a 5” (127mm) gun. I do wish they would add a third version of the ship, configured like the Brooks sub-class (5 ships) that mounted 5”/51 Mk 7 guns as mounted on the older US battleships. It would provide a little more hitting power and range.

[@matthewhurst6099]

The console version is at tier 3 and was my favourite ship as its so easy to play. Had a 5.2km detection with 5.5km torps so hard to stealth torp lol.

[@davidwright7193]

On the mobile version it is at tier 4 and has a 5.6km detection and a 5.4km torpedo so no possibility of a stealth kill.

[@AverageWTPilot]

The clemson is my second favorite ship in the game right behind the cleveland.

[@MarkBuckleyCorkTuba]

Thanks Jingles.

[@celestial4638]

I miss sailing my chunky and slow Wyoming and its many guns at t4. Ive yet to pop my card out but feel i should since ive been playing free for years. I grinded my way to a Montana with 19 pt captain.

[@KMACKTIME]

I hear you were a radio man on board a ship in the gulf war and saved a ship from a missile attack.. god on ya mate

[@jamessweet5341]

The Isokaze is very good indeed, but I'll take the Yubari at tier 4. Incredibly accurate guns and decent torps on a speedy little light cruiser.

[@stevesteffen7001]

That was a fun one to watch

[@1958PonyBoy]

I like the more basic combat that takes place at lower tiers. No Radar, no Hydro acoustic search, no overpowered carriers, and the torpedoes have slow speed, short ranges and lower damage.

[@Kompoism]

Aaaah low-tier WoWs gameplay. Reminds me of a more innocent time, a happier time. One where I was unaware of what the devs were like and how annoyed I would be in the future before un-installing! :(

[@Axonteer]

also: dat fort on dat map... must be the most DD loved small island on ANY map in world of floating lootboxes

[@markfrank3307]

Morning Jingles