Building and flying my Sonex # number 1095 was one of the most enjoyable and rewarding experiences of my life. It is an ingeniously simple and strong design and just a blast to fly. I will always be grateful for the excellent customer support I received during my build.
@christophermcnally87823 жыл бұрын
I have built 3 legacy models...2 from kits and 1 from plans. I am now rebuilding another legacy model that was badly damaged. Sonex Is a great company and I enjoy seeing them every year at Oshkosh.
@sirnewton68743 жыл бұрын
You have a great channel. I must admit, I have a crush on Sonex. They do so much with so little!
@ExperimentalAircraftChannel3 жыл бұрын
Thank You! We appreciate your support! I think it is a great design as well. Especially now with the B-Model being able to accept a wider variety of engine options. 197mph VNE is really nice to play with on the other end of the scale too!
@LeftSeatAdventures3 жыл бұрын
Yup, you said it perfectly! That's why I ended up getting one. The tradeoff though is that they are small, something you notice right away in person. But they're a ton of fun nonetheless!
@joeking49653 жыл бұрын
When I was a 9 year old kid I went with my dad (My dad was a very early EAA member ) over this guys house in Elgin Illinois. We went to the guys garage to see the airplane he was building. We later went into the guys house where I noticed that the guy had built a small airplane like a pedal car that his young son could ride on. That guy was at the time a school teacher named John Monnett and the airplane was the prototype Sonerai and the pedal car airplane is hanging from the ceiling in this video, at the 1:09 mark. I'm guessing John built that for his son Jeremy. I'm 59 years old now and still remember that day and how nice of a guy John was to me and my dad.
@raf60093 жыл бұрын
It's amazing how time rolls on, I can only imagine the feeling you'd have seeing the pedal car in the vid, how awesome. 👍
@theworshiptraveler67093 жыл бұрын
Great interview. That subsonic is the cats meow!
@iancrossley66373 жыл бұрын
Really wanted to hear more about the jet engine thrust, fuel economy, range, reliability etc etc.
@WhereNerdyisCool3 жыл бұрын
Right? Me too!
@WhereNerdyisCool3 жыл бұрын
@Galileo7of9 so you ask the questions you know your experimental aviation’s fans would love answered 🙂
@AVIATION-AJ3 жыл бұрын
www.pbsaerospace.com/aerospace-products/engines/turbojet-engines/tj-100-turbojet-engine Here is a link to the PBS page for more engine information, hope this helps answer some questions!
@trvman13 жыл бұрын
These small/tiny planes are nothing but death traps. No room for error.
@leneanderthalien3 жыл бұрын
@@trvman1 seems you known nothing: the Sonex (with prop engine) are approved as ultralight in Europe, and only safe aircrafts can reach this approvation...The only reason i did not buy a Sonex kit for long time is the small cockpit headroom who is not adapted for people of more than 1,80M height like myself...
@azzamaddas44373 жыл бұрын
Great tour, you were super, as usual, and Mark was exceptional.
@ExperimentalAircraftChannel3 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Thank You for your support. It was great getting to know Mark during our visit there. He is truly passionate about Aviation as well!
@scottwatrous3 жыл бұрын
Good to see they're still growing and adding new tools. Adding a CNC router definitely will help with prototyping.
@ExperimentalAircraftChannel3 жыл бұрын
Lot's of cool things going on there. I hope to be able to report more in the very near future about what else is going on there. Projects etc. Thank You for watching and supporting here!
@robertlafnear48653 жыл бұрын
Love this little plane ! Thanks for the video.............. Is that a NEW Hat ?.
@مصطفىادريس-ع9ب3 ай бұрын
انا بستفيد منك كتير جدا
@kennedysingh39162 жыл бұрын
Watched from Jamaica.
@Bupkus68 Жыл бұрын
Fascinating
@Sonex8253 жыл бұрын
Looks like a blast to fly!
@ExperimentalAircraftChannel3 жыл бұрын
Would love to experience it one day as well!
@ldvan1003 жыл бұрын
Started but never completed my Private License 50yrs ago... No doubt one of the biggest regrets of my life... Wish I could turn back time...
@Project2Aero3 жыл бұрын
These are some cool machines! Thanks for the tour!
@ExperimentalAircraftChannel3 жыл бұрын
Hey! Thanks for showing up! You are very welcome!
@celalkalaycoglu48803 жыл бұрын
this is art...
@sledawgpilot3 жыл бұрын
Cool design, needs more power!
@muddypawsadventurer77753 жыл бұрын
The Sonex that needs to be developed... 2 seat tandem, twin jet, mini A10 Warthog. Instant hit!
@jakesmith23412 жыл бұрын
A10 warthog without the massive gun isn't a warthog at all :( I don't think they make mini GAU-10 Avengers, and I don't think the general public could afford one either. A mini F-15, on the other hand...
@muddypawsadventurer77752 жыл бұрын
@@jakesmith2341 You miss the whole point. It's about taking an existing air frame and giving it that extra 300 ftlbs of thrust. the wings and copy of the A10 tail in my engineering mind could be one of the best performing micro jets in the world. Ask an A10 pilot if he be able to dog fight an F15
@jakesmith23412 жыл бұрын
@@muddypawsadventurer7775 the wings and tail are pretty good darn cool, I'll agree. I kinda wish there was an affordable consumer jet with afterburners, but that's pie-in-the-sky, no?
@muddypawsadventurer77752 жыл бұрын
@@jakesmith2341 yes, we could only wish somebody smarter than us build a micro jet engine with an afterburner... LOL
@Classickoolcars Жыл бұрын
Please please just take my money!!!🤣🤣👍❤️
@carlmclelland76243 жыл бұрын
Truly an excellent presentation. IF... I were in the market to build a plane, I would give Sonex a definite, serious evaluation. Who's knows, however... if my ship comes in tomorrow and I'm not at the airport.... You earned my subscription; looking forward to more presentations.
@bhaskarparam9711 Жыл бұрын
Wow wow
@wingslevel3 жыл бұрын
Love the factory tours! Thanks!
@ExperimentalAircraftChannel3 жыл бұрын
Thank You! We appreciate your support!
@PiefacePete462 жыл бұрын
That was a real good-un! Very informative, thanks. :o)
@ExperimentalAircraftChannel2 жыл бұрын
Thanks John! Appreciate your support!
@projectbumblejeep41902 жыл бұрын
Have you considered doing a twin jet variant? Something along the lines of an A-10 configuration? With a V tail. That would be fun to fly. Just a thought. God bless, stay well.
@Gmoney_723 жыл бұрын
Always love the Sonex coverage.
@phillippierce44523 жыл бұрын
The fuselage is ALWAYS built first! So, you can sit in it and make airplane noises.
@budipirang26943 жыл бұрын
Wow very nice
@ik043 жыл бұрын
I'm waiting for the retractable gear from the jet being included in the Waiex kit.
@ExperimentalAircraftChannel3 жыл бұрын
THAT... would be pretty cool for sure! Thanks for watching today!
@vax42003 жыл бұрын
Same, but the BRS option, from the jet to the Waiex.
@MsCathrynC3 жыл бұрын
I would like to start with a 2-place SubSonex, but mount a Rotax 915 in the nose, with in-flight adjustable prop (electric constant speed). That way the plane would already have the aerodynamic flight surfaces to handle high speeds and g’s. If I ever get the money together I’m going to set up an appointment to talk it over with them.
@LeftSeatAdventures3 жыл бұрын
I'll ask Mark for ya in an upcoming interview video, although he's very good about responding to emails as well.
@LeftSeatAdventures3 жыл бұрын
@@vax4200 Multiple people have installed BRS systems on Sonex Aircraft, there's a few vids floating around. The issue is weight and the space they take up, but it can absolutely be done.
@doncatchpole73703 жыл бұрын
Enjoyed
@ExperimentalAircraftChannel3 жыл бұрын
Thank You!
@garymyers66382 жыл бұрын
I noticed in the short clip from Oshkosh that one of the Sub Sonex's had an extended nose (the one with the Russian star on the empennage) Who's plane is that and where can I see more about it?
@JoesRCCorner3 жыл бұрын
Great tour of the factory. I was actually debating building a Sonex before I decided on the Cruzer. Still a really nice plane. Retracts would be cool on the Sonex.
@ExperimentalAircraftChannel3 жыл бұрын
You and I both! I might make it the second build once the first is flying. You can fit a Low Wing and a High Wing in most hangars together you know! :-)
@JoesRCCorner3 жыл бұрын
@@ExperimentalAircraftChannel Still need to stay married though. LOL
@jakesmith23412 жыл бұрын
@@JoesRCCorner Hmmm... Mortgage payments or second plane? 🤔 I'll be in the cardboard box off 8th Ave.
@stanleyyager49413 жыл бұрын
It reminds me of Jim Bede's personal airplane (BD5 Microjet a record Guinnes) that was used in a James Bond movie.
@GMoneyMacFresh2 жыл бұрын
Yeah BD-5J is smaller
@df51183 жыл бұрын
Do they add anti corrosion coating in the factory or does the builder add it them selves?
@prasadjonnalagedda86333 жыл бұрын
i have just few hrs in cessna s (single engine) as student pilot long back. i still keep browsing about tiny planes in GA sector. i am wondering if any experts here can clarify few doubts i have: - considering himalayan/ tibetan mountain ranges and their weather patterns, is it possible to design a piston-engine (normal petrol), single-place aircraft, with about a ceiling of 35,000 ft? - can the same aircraft be STOL & fuel efficient at low altitudes for cross country flying/ long trips? thanks in advance.
@Classickoolcars Жыл бұрын
I’m no engineer, but as a student of history and looking back at WW2 they used to super charge the engine to compensate for the lack of oxygen at high altitudes…. Which brings upon more issues, like a working oxygen set up for the pilot.. or pressurization like a commercial aircraft 🤷♂️👍👌
@prasadjonnalagedda8633 Жыл бұрын
@@Classickoolcars thanks for your reply sir. i am aware of the oxygen and pressure issues. 35k ceiling for long sustained flights is not my requirement. carrying an oxygen mask/ cylinder shouldn’t be a problem even in an ultralight. in highly dangerous himalayan territory, i am only looking for 35k ceiling for unknown special situations.
@chekyerego2 жыл бұрын
They were talking about a high wing a while ago. I wonder how that's going.
@DuncanFisher-s5s Жыл бұрын
Is there data yet on any empennage fatigue in the v-tail model, such as plagued early Bonanzas?
@LeftSeatAdventures3 жыл бұрын
Nice work Bryan! (🤫Did you happen to pick up anything while you were there? )
@ExperimentalAircraftChannel3 жыл бұрын
Hah! Noooo! Not yet anyway. Can only work on one new Aircraft project at a time while bringing new Aviation Content to you weekly. But... I am going to keep an open conversation with Sonex for future.
@Korixon.2 жыл бұрын
i live like right by Oshkosh so i can take just a few minutes to og and see it lol
@tngtacticalmiata12193 жыл бұрын
Wow... When you really think about the pricing it's not out of reach for MOST moderately successful people... If you can live without the jet it's not even as expensive as a properly equipped 1-ton work truck... Imma start savin...
@southjerseysound73403 жыл бұрын
It's not as hard to own a plane as most people think. I'm in the lower middle class spectrum and own a Maule M4 Rocket and some other toys. Now I'd prefer the M7 260,but not happening 😆 I got my M4 needing recovered and did it myself with help from a friend with his ticket. Every plane I've bought has needed work,I've paid cash,purchased wisely and made money when sold except for one. But I put 200 hours on my 172 and broke even. I've only bought 1 new truck years ago and when I calculated what they made in interest I said never again. I've got a 93 3500 dually I bought around 2000 to tow my boat and use as a truck that's been updated with new motor and trans swap. I've also got a 2013 Audi S3 that was a totaled theft recovery. Again I shopped around finding the right deal and even though it's got a branded title I'll sell it for profit if possible and if not I'll keep it until it owes me nothing. I calculated the money we've saved over the years in interest and it's astronomical and while it takes some sacrifices at first. Once you're rolling with saving and investing it goes fast
@oculosprudentium84863 жыл бұрын
What is the cost, altitude and range for this model B ?
@TRPGpilot3 жыл бұрын
Very nice video as normal. Don't change anything, the format, the questions, the presentation, you were born to build planes and be on KZbin ha ha
@ExperimentalAircraftChannel3 жыл бұрын
Thank You! I really appreciate your support and feedback. It means a lot! :-)
@alfaysalabuzaitoon9882 жыл бұрын
What is the name of the application in the minute 15:18
@joedoakes83072 жыл бұрын
What is the max thrust of the engine and it's cost ? is there only one engine available ! Can the engine that powers a cruise missile be purchased and utilized on a Sonex aircraft ?
@ddd.777-10 ай бұрын
The engine that they use it's a pbs with about 1100Nm of thrust, but is expensive like 70k, but there is another engine called jetcat p1000 with the same thrust wich is alot chraper, i think. I couldn't find the price for it but one of their engines with half that thrust (500Nm) still flyable on this airplane but way slower, costs like 10.000 so i guess tha p1000 can cost somewhere over 20.000 but i think no more than 40.000 dollars
@bikersoncall3 жыл бұрын
I would love to own one of these, I would never find the patience to do a build, this or any other kit.
@LeftSeatAdventures3 жыл бұрын
That was something I learned about myself in my Sonex journey, don't think I'd have the patience to build right now. Instead I bought a project and brought it back to life. Keep an eye on Barnstormers, multiple project opportunities come and go.
@Pushyhog3 жыл бұрын
blue shirt had correct answer on how to start, only!
@free-birdrocker88093 жыл бұрын
Sonex? John Monett had the Moni, which became the sonex. My pops had the Monett Sonerai 1 with a souped up VW engine, and it was cool and fast for a small good looking bird. I wonder if they will every bring back the Sonerai 1 and 2?
@codetech55983 жыл бұрын
How does this compare to the BD5?
@ExperimentalAircraftChannel3 жыл бұрын
1) It is in production. 2) It is still very much supported and parts/kits available NOW 3) It appears to be a better design. Thanks for taking the time to watch!
@venusreena25323 жыл бұрын
Racecar fuel bladders are Goodyear tire sidewall material..
@moisesmadrid95523 жыл бұрын
I would buy the nose wheel with propellor engine option
@jeffreywitty3088 Жыл бұрын
looks a lot like a Blohm and Voss Bv P.213 (Miniatur-Jager), with better placement of a more modern jet. Just sayin >> A Pulse jet could really drop the costs
@Lightning5462 жыл бұрын
Would love to have one of these, but it'll never happen at these prices. My (1900 sqft) house cost less than one of these planes.
@carlospenaenrriquez22 Жыл бұрын
Mekiero fabricar una
@vanessal72912 жыл бұрын
Quite boring. Would like to see some actual construction and flight. ✈️🛫
@bradolsen86293 жыл бұрын
I might have to go to my bank and take out a loan for the jet lol
@michaelrobertson87953 жыл бұрын
I want one
@peteranderson0373 жыл бұрын
I'm going to interpret no further news of their electric powerplant as meaning that the project is dead. It's a shame really. Such a system doesn't make much sense in their standard Sonex or Waiex, but it makes absolute sense in their Xenos motor glider. Sonex is the only company making a glider kit, let alone a motor glider, that is reasonably priced and can be assembled by normal human beings.
@TheMarcball3 жыл бұрын
Exactly, although I hear some EAA chapters are planning to electrify a Xenos...
@leekresge12683 жыл бұрын
They are already out here. Not that difficult of a conversion.
@Sierranite Жыл бұрын
Nice idea but one can buy ex military jet trainers for ~ $60K and three times the performance
@TheRinzler22 жыл бұрын
Cubs do have fuel tanks in their wings… soooo…
@alexthompson64123 жыл бұрын
I always wanted to fly a V1 flying bomb...
@kdrapertrucker2 жыл бұрын
Funny, the Bede 5 looks smaller.
@Leafbinder3 жыл бұрын
click bait i wanted to see more about the jet not a prop plane.
@JoaoPaulo-rb7kl3 жыл бұрын
Star?
@tinolino583 жыл бұрын
What a blabla about B-models. The world needs a larger C-model!
@ExperimentalAircraftChannel3 жыл бұрын
It took them how many years to get to the B-Model... now you want a C-Model? Geeesh! Hah! So... what would this "C-Model" look like in your mind? Details? :-)
@kyqx3 жыл бұрын
@@ExperimentalAircraftChannel A Cherokee 180, lol.
@tinolino583 жыл бұрын
C-model: 500lbs crew weight. Staggered seats accepted. Max takeoff 1320 - 1450lbs. Tapered removable wings! Second set of extended wingtips for the rockies and alps. Wingloading ~ 11.5 lbs/ft2. VNE 199mph, +6g -3g. Slightly wider / longer fuselage. More prop clearance for standard props. Accepts engines like: 320/340, Vikings, ULs, 3300, etc. Regards from the alps
@leneanderthalien3 жыл бұрын
Jet engine for a low speed aircraft is unnefficient , fuel consumption is very high...
@JeffreyinChina3 жыл бұрын
The jet is like your hot motorcycle for the weekend hour rip , so I have a car for travelling and work and a motorcycle for different reasons...The jet is a second airplane that fits in your hanger under the wing of your 172..