THIS Math Concept PROVES God Is Real

Wretched TV and Radio are hosted by Todd Friel. On the show, you will see and hear live witnessing encounters, discussions of tough theological issues, and christian commentary on current events. We might even make you laugh.
WATCH FULL WRETCHED TV EPISODES:
wretched.org/tv/
LISTEN TO FULL WRETCHED RADIO SHOWS:
wretched.org/ra...
VISIT OUR WEBSITE:
wretched.org/
SUPPORT WRETCHED:
wretched.org/d...
FACEBOOK:
Wretched: / wretchednetwork
TWITTER:
Wretched: / wretchednetwork
Todd Friel: / toddfriel
INSTAGRAM:
Wretched: / wretched.network

[@monical2840]

That kid with the backpack is such a sweetheart to have participated like that. You see everyone else buzzing around in the background like they're too busy.

[@cleo7066]

Dawg he’s in public they probably are actually busy.

[@monical2840]

@@cleo7066 never be too busy for God

[@MrGrumblier]

I imagine he was a plant. His responses fed perfectly into Todd's narrative.

[@__Violet._.]

yes, agreed very much so, humans love to distract themselves (and they are good at it) not to face their own Soul Condition, do not think that when U die this attitude changes .

[@monical2840]

@@__Violet._. .. depends on what you mean by "die".. whether you're talking about the first or the second death. When we're born again, our attitude changes. I would argue that that is the first death. Then the books are opened and we are judged. I think a lot of Christians are teaching it wrong. But that's just my opinion. I could be wrong.😉 Have a wonderful day!

[@3unhy3]

The student is so respectful

[@MrGrumblier]

One tends to be respectful to the guy paying him.

[@seanrath8268]

​@@MrGrumblierBeing respectful is normal among normal people.We don't need payment for being polite and respectful ❤

[@MrGrumblier]

@@seanrath8268 You missed my point. I was inferring that the "student" was a plant. I suspect he was either paid or volunteered to play the part of the straight man for Todd's sermon.

[@melindamercier6811]

@@MrGrumblier you suspect Todd is fraudulently preaching to this boy bc he paid him off? That’s quite an accusation with zero proof to back it up, and extremely far-fetched compared to the concept that he really was just a respectful young man. My goodness…

[@MrGrumblier]

@@melindamercier6811 No, I base my conclusion on the fact that this young man is providing the perfect responses to Todd's preaching, is the only one there, and is clearly not an atheist. Todd is preaching to the choir.

[@jameshines9330]

God proves He exists everyday.

[@brendabreslin1917]

By his destructive ways!

[@jameshines9330]

@@brendabreslin1917 I hope you miss His wrath.

[@Pikkon-17]

@@brendabreslin1917 🤡

[@brendabreslin1917]

@@jameshines9330 Go ahead, make my Eternity!

[@brendabreslin1917]

@@Pikkon-17 No it's God and an Abusive, Bullying, Narcissist!

[@Luke-vg4mt]

Math was created by man? thats like saying man created logic reason. And many believe that too! very sad that students dont think that 2+2= 4 if man doesnt exist. We may have named it math but It exits even if we dont.

[@azophi]

I mean math is a language we use to describe the world…. Literally look at any like college level math textbook We invent axioms and discover the implications of them . We use the language of math to describe reality etc

[@americandingo311]

Man invented mathematics, but man did not invent the rules of the universe that mathematics _attempts_ to define.

[@ullnevaknow2364]

Without man there will be no math, no one will be there to add 2 and 2, man is the one who assigns numbers to objects which had zero connection to mathematics

[@uberboat4512]

@@azophi False. We express math using arbitrary symbols. But the logic behind it still exists whether or not man describes it. That's like saying trees don't exist if man never learned language. The tree is still there it's just described using language.

[@solb101]

God exists too whether we exist or not.

[@wataboutya9310]

Over and over again in the Old Testament God proved his existence in many ways to the Israelites. I mean mind boggling ways. All he asked of them was to keep his commandments which over and over again they failed to do and suffered the consequences. Even his most faithful servants failed him because of their human nature. But this is the way everything is meant to play out and cannot be changed. Pain, suffering, and death will be with us all until the messiah returns. That could be next week or a thousand years from now. Our creator is not confined by what we know and call time. Keep the Faith!

[@jamberry8026]

The god(s) of the bible and all man made religions is a fraud. Elohim and Yahweh are plural terms meaning god(s). Namely Enki and Enlil who were the powerful ones that Jesus told you not to worship.

[@FASBLAQUE]

@@shamefulcritic1125 God doesn't punish. You are punished by your own hand, because you you refuse to accept admonishment and will not govern yourself.

[@SoldierofJesus_John316]

​@@FASBLAQUEGod does punish because He loves us. He disciplines us because He is a loving Father.

[@4ndytrout46]

Oh wow! He proved his existence in your fairy tale book? Too bad he can't do it in reality.

[@mogdor]

Things in the book proving other things in the book. That isn't proof things in the book are real. We need proof coming from outside of the book.

[@Amor_Fati_]

Christ saved me 6 years ago. It's all real. Christ is Lord ✝

[@bladerunner3314]

Prove it.

[@Amor_Fati_]

@@bladerunner3314 Holy Spirit saved me. I can't prove how I feel, but I feel at peace.

[@bladerunner3314]

@@Amor_Fati_ Anecdote isn't evidence.

[@glennryzebol4472]

I wish i had this guy's talent for apologetics. He articulates his points in such a beautifully concise manner.

[@Silent_Quasar]

Its false tho

[@Cantthinkofahandle117]

How so? ​@@Silent_Quasar

[@Maitisanwj4]

A fish can't live without water, a plant can't live without a soil, so also human can't live without God, God is source of all creations.

[@hummingbird_saltalamakia]

@anders anderson false gods, aka the fallen angels, sure. God doesn't rely on us. God wanted a creation with true free will. We are the object of His affection. Yeshua Ha'Mashiach et Adonai Seek the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Aka absolute truth.

[@JediMaestr0]

This is the Transcendental Argument as proposed by Cornelius Van Til, and it’s possibly my absolute favorite argument for God. Happy to see it so well explained here, and also happy to see a very thoughtful and calm discussion as opposed to the shouting matches of other videos

[@Twodegreesoff]

I absolutely agree. 🙏🏾

[@Enigmatic_philosopher]

Cornelius Van Til's Transcendental Argument for the existence of God (TAG) is a philosophical argument which posits that all reasoning and logical thought necessarily presupposes the existence of God. It suggests that without a divine foundation, we cannot account for the laws of logic, uniformity of nature, or morality. Van Til asserts that non-Christian worldviews lead to irrationality and inconsistency. However, there are several counter-arguments to this position: 1. **Circular Reasoning:** Critics often point out that the Transcendental Argument relies on a form of circular reasoning. It assumes the truth of Christian theism in order to prove the truth of Christian theism. This is not typically considered a valid form of argument. 2. **Non-Christian Rationality:** The assertion that non-Christian worldviews lead to irrationality is debatable. There are many non-Christian philosophical systems, both theistic and atheistic, that offer coherent and consistent explanations of logic, nature, and morality. For instance, Buddhist philosophy, which is non-theistic, provides a comprehensive moral and metaphysical framework. 3. **Presupposition of God's Existence:** The argument presupposes the existence of the Christian God, but it doesn't give sufficient evidence why this God should be the necessary foundation for logic and morality, rather than any other deity or deities, or even abstract, non-theistic principles. 4. **Arbitrary Assertion:** Critics argue that saying "God is the necessary precondition of logic" is an arbitrary assertion. It is equally possible to claim that the laws of logic exist necessarily, without requiring a divine guarantor. 5. **Problem of Evil:** The existence of natural and moral evils in the world can be seen as inconsistent with a benevolent and omnipotent God, which poses a challenge to the Christian worldview that Van Til's TAG assumes. In conclusion, while Van Til's Transcendental Argument is compelling to some, it has been widely critiqued and is not universally accepted. The above points are just a few of the potential counter-arguments. As always, the questions of God's existence and the nature of reality are complex and deeply personal, and different people will find different arguments persuasive based on their prior beliefs, experiences, and philosophical inclinations.

[@Enigmatic_philosopher]

The argument presented in the video is one that merges various theological and philosophical perspectives, including the cosmological argument, the argument from design, the argument from complexity, and the argument from morality. While these are all interesting perspectives, they also have been subjects of critique and counter-arguments. Let's explore each point separately. 1. **Explanation for Mathematical Constants and Something from Nothing:** This asserts that the complexity and precision of the universe, such as mathematical constants like pi or the gravitational constant, imply a designer. This is a form of the teleological argument (argument from design). However, the counter-argument is that it commits the fallacy of assuming complexity requires a designer. The precision we observe might be intrinsic to the nature of a coherent universe, not necessarily the result of conscious design. The question of how we got "something from nothing" is a deep philosophical and scientific one. There are cosmological theories, such as those involving quantum fluctuations, that suggest it's possible for a universe to arise from "nothing" in a quantum mechanical sense. To assert that "only a god could do this" is to make a claim beyond what we can empirically test or verify. 2. **DNA and Information:** The statement that "DNA can detract information but it can never add too" is not accurate. New information can and does arise in DNA through various mechanisms, such as gene duplication and subsequent mutation, or horizontal gene transfer in bacteria. 3. **Irreducible Complexity and Complexity of DNA:** The argument from irreducible complexity posits that certain biological systems are too complex to have evolved naturally. However, this argument has been widely critiqued in the scientific community. Evolutionary biologists have proposed numerous plausible pathways for the step-by-step evolution of seemingly "irreducibly complex" systems. The length of DNA, while impressive, doesn't necessarily imply a designer. The complexity of life, as encoded in DNA, is the result of billions of years of evolutionary processes, not a measure of initial design complexity. 4. **Glasses and Man-made Objects:** Comparing a biological organism to a man-made object, like glasses, is a false analogy. Man-made objects do not replicate or evolve, while organisms do. Evolution by natural selection is a well-supported explanation for the complex adaptation we see in the biological world. 5. **Basis for Morality:** The assertion that morality requires a divine lawgiver is a common argument, but it's not without counter-arguments. There are many philosophical frameworks for morality that don't rely on a deity, such as consequentialism (judging actions by their outcomes), deontology (judging actions by their adherence to rules), and virtue ethics (focusing on the development of moral character), among others. Additionally, many evolutionary biologists and psychologists argue that our moral instincts can be understood as a product of natural selection. For example, cooperation and empathy can be beneficial for the survival of social species, including humans. While these arguments bring up deep and fascinating questions, their conclusions are not the only possible interpretations of the observed facts. Many of their premises are challenged by scientific and philosophical scholarship. As with all such matters, open-minded and rigorous inquiry is key to understanding.

[@richardstevenwalz4968]

Except it's all utterly total garbage!

[@simplyforged4025]

@@Enigmatic_philosopher I agree with 4 of the 5 takes that these are valid counter-arguments in the sense that they make it clear that the argument given in this video isn't a 100% guarantee because as humans we still have limited capacities and understanding. The reason I do not agree with the 5th one, "The Problem of Evil" is because I don't understand the premise of this point. Are you saying that because natural and moral evils exist that this means it does not align with Christian theology? If so then No that would be wrong as in Christian Theology they re-affirm consistently the evil nature of Man and Sin as a point to the fact we need Jesus Christ to save us from our sins.

[@poppylove3673]

I would really like to take an online class to learn how to interact and have such great discussions, as you do with people! Thank you for setting such a good example for us! ❤👍🏽

[@MrGrumblier]

It's easy, just follow the script Todd gives you.

[@poppylove3673]

@@MrGrumblier Ok, thanks! 👍🏽

[@JontheBerean]

Humans and everything else is devolving, not evolving

[@michaelanderson4849]

So, a majority being able to survive an environment which killed a majority of the population just a few generations earlier, is a sign of devolution. 🤔

[@JontheBerean]

@@michaelanderson4849 More people have died in the last hundred years through violence , wars than ever before that. Sickness is greater than in past, the gap between the rich and poor is greater than ever, sinfulness abounds Humans are getting worse , not better

[@michaelanderson4849]

@@JontheBerean About the wars. Nope, not even close. Check your numbers and compare those to the last ten centuries. Way higher percentage of the population got whacked prior to this century. Sickness is greater... Come again? Ever heard of the bubonic plague for example? Gap between rich and poor... Come again? Fewer were filthy rich a millennnia ago. But those who were were wealthier than today if you convert their money to todays value. Sinfulness... Come again? What is done today that weren't done a few centuries ago? Sin against who by the way?

[@thebayjay]

@@JontheBerean Not only that but we are facing the biggest genocide that has ever occurred in history in abortion, more than 10 times that of the Holocaust.

[@JontheBerean]

@@thebayjay 😢

[@Nicolae_Mew]

Lol this preacher wouldn't last 5 minutes in a discord call with someone who actually pushes back on his fallacious reasoning.

[@KingKongbabe]

Try reality sometime

[@Nicolae_Mew]

@@KingKongbabe Try kicking a termite mound with ur bare feet

[@KingKongbabe]

@@Nicolae_Mew seek counseling

[@Nicolae_Mew]

@@KingKongbabe I have and it's not working, help

[@KingKongbabe]

@@Nicolae_Mew watch - Genesis Paradise Lost and Evolution vs God

[@ferdinandsibayan1232]

He nailed it again perfect...

[@thorstenenglert7200]

Not at all, just claims All complexity can come out without a creator behind.

[@romereal9369]

How and where list an example

[@thorstenenglert7200]

@@romereal9369 That question is a joke I guess ... there is plenty of literature and documentaries about complex systems that came up without any creator or designer. Look for them under complex systems, look for them under evolution. And then prove you that there is a creator behind the big bang.

[@BEhistoricStudios]

easier proof: If you were walking in the Sahara desert and saw an oil painting portrait of a dog. Would you think automatically its designed and produced with a purpose by someone? Yes. You wont be able to see the producer, or the factory, or the designer. But you are sure its 100% made by someone due too its purpose and design and logical order. So now... if you see the universe as a huge vast Sahara, and in the middle of nothingness, yo saw a complex system with planets set on distance to the stars and tho themselves, protected by different layers, magnetism and all the things that need to come in place for it to be a complex, working, life holding galaxy. Would you then think someone created it? Whats more complex? An oil painting? Or our breathable world? How can IQ and Logics be created in a universe which lacks both? Atheism is the biggest scam.

[@arunk2710]

Out of all the planets, why only one planet has life. Instead of only seeing the universe as something perfectly designed by God, see what's imperfect in it too. See humans and other life on Earth as survivors. Think about all the other species that went extinct. Whatever adapts survives. The oil painting example as proof of God is one of the worst I've ever encountered. The Oil painting was most probably made by a human and we can prove it. What else could have painted the dog? An automated Robot, maybe. We have seen humans paint, so we can confirm that the painting was most probably made by a human. Have we ever seen or experienced God creating the universe? We couldn't have. God exists but we have only little idea what God is like. We can say that God is something that created the universe. But many that says God exists and that God is Jesus has no proof. Many say, "We don't need proof, we believe God exists. We believe that Jesus is God or God's son." or whatever "We believe in the Bible." Faith/belief does not always mean it's real.

[@ML-ni1tk]

This is a good point.

[@drinkswatere]

First off the Sahara desert is on earth and the earth has humans that make paintings. We know of them we know we make them. So finding a painting would be something we could be certain was made from a human . The universe with its planets and stars and nebula etc.. yeah we definitely didn’t make those. So that must mean it’s god right? That’s just laughable and makes no sense. There is no proof of god and even if there was you’d have no proof he created the universe. I also think atheism is illogical but this more dumb than anything I’ve heard them say.

[@ullnevaknow2364]

That's only because you have seen someone create a painting before, that's the reason you have managed to recognise the object as a paint.

[@BEhistoricStudios]

@@ullnevaknow2364 WRONG. You know when something is "finely tuned" like a phone, materials needed to make it, finally tune them so you almost see the purpose.. just like the sun and its distance to the earth ;) Your to narrow minded. Atheism is also an active choice you do every day, you biology knows and reckognizes god.

[@billdiaz3041]

“A junkyard contains all the bits and pieces of a Boeing 747, dismembered and in disarray. A whirlwind happens to blow through the yard. What is the chance that after its passage a fully assembled 747, ready to fly, will be found standing there? So small as to be negligible, even if a tornado were to blow through enough junkyards to fill the whole Universe.” ― Fred Hoyle, The Intelligent Universe: A New View of Creation and Evolution

[@lenroddis5933]

Is that the same Fred Hoyle, the cosmologist whose Steady State Theory of the Universe was debunked decades ago?

[@resurrectionbaptistchurchc1947]

Math isn’t created by man. It is observed by man. Math is an objective reality instituted by God! Also proof of metaphysical reality. Love, hate, joy etc… all proof of God’s existence!

[@lizadowning4389]

We didn't invent math, true ... but we did more than observe it, we explored it and used it to our benefit. That does however, in no way, prove that it's instituted by your deity. You just fill in the gap with your favourite fantasy hero. Mine is the pink unicorn, it has every bit of validity as yours. It's even more powerfull than yours. And I can prove it because it's in a book I just wrote.

[@bobopatchnosuke229]

​@@lizadowning4389cringe

[@Enigmatic_philosopher]

The argument presented is one that merges various theological and philosophical perspectives, including the cosmological argument, the argument from design, the argument from complexity, and the argument from morality. While these are all interesting perspectives, they also have been subjects of critique and counter-arguments. Let's explore each point separately. 1. **Explanation for Mathematical Constants and Something from Nothing:** This asserts that the complexity and precision of the universe, such as mathematical constants like pi or the gravitational constant, imply a designer. This is a form of the teleological argument (argument from design). However, the counter-argument is that it commits the fallacy of assuming complexity requires a designer. The precision we observe might be intrinsic to the nature of a coherent universe, not necessarily the result of conscious design. The question of how we got "something from nothing" is a deep philosophical and scientific one. There are cosmological theories, such as those involving quantum fluctuations, that suggest it's possible for a universe to arise from "nothing" in a quantum mechanical sense. To assert that "only a god could do this" is to make a claim beyond what we can empirically test or verify. 2. **DNA and Information:** The statement that "DNA can detract information but it can never add too" is not accurate. New information can and does arise in DNA through various mechanisms, such as gene duplication and subsequent mutation, or horizontal gene transfer in bacteria. 3. **Irreducible Complexity and Complexity of DNA:** The argument from irreducible complexity posits that certain biological systems are too complex to have evolved naturally. However, this argument has been widely critiqued in the scientific community. Evolutionary biologists have proposed numerous plausible pathways for the step-by-step evolution of seemingly "irreducibly complex" systems. The length of DNA, while impressive, doesn't necessarily imply a designer. The complexity of life, as encoded in DNA, is the result of billions of years of evolutionary processes, not a measure of initial design complexity. 4. **Glasses and Man-made Objects:** Comparing a biological organism to a man-made object, like glasses, is a false analogy. Man-made objects do not replicate or evolve, while organisms do. Evolution by natural selection is a well-supported explanation for the complex adaptation we see in the biological world. 5. **Basis for Morality:** The assertion that morality requires a divine lawgiver is a common argument, but it's not without counter-arguments. There are many philosophical frameworks for morality that don't rely on a deity, such as consequentialism (judging actions by their outcomes), deontology (judging actions by their adherence to rules), and virtue ethics (focusing on the development of moral character), among others. Additionally, many evolutionary biologists and psychologists argue that our moral instincts can be understood as a product of natural selection. For example, cooperation and empathy can be beneficial for the survival of social species, including humans. While these arguments bring up deep and fascinating questions, their conclusions are not the only possible interpretations of the observed facts. Many of their premises are challenged by scientific and philosophical scholarship. As with all such matters, open-minded and rigorous inquiry is key to understanding.

[@cameronadair5422]

There is ZERO proof of your God's existence. How about the other 3,000 odd gods invented by mankind? Can you tell me about all of those?

[@SubJStan]

Brought to you by: The Argument from Incredulity!

[@xXdsideXx]

Replace "I feel like its good to beat up small children" with "I feel like its okay to mutilate children's bodies as young as the age of 3" and you would have where we are as a country today... Its truly sad that his argument for morality may soon be at an end when no one is moral anymore. They wont even understand this question. Jesus forgive us.

[@christislord2535]

The detransitioners have finally started to speak.the world will know soon enough. All glory to the most high

[@xXdsideXx]

@@christislord2535 Amen.

[@azophi]

Yes! This is why I think we should not circumcise our children at birth. That is mutilating their body and it really doesn’t add much of any health assuming someone washes themselves properly.

[@pongoellis1670]

Most recent estimates of cells in the human body put the number at around 30 trillion. 50 mil seemed small so it checked it out. This guy is amazing thow.

[@ORSkie]

I believe he was talking about the length of the DNA code, tho.

[@pongoellis1670]

He did mention that later, but noo... we were talking bout cell numbers alright. thx 4 attempting 2 help tho. @@ORSkie

[@sailoroftheinternet3290]

Math is consistent because it follows strict rules, or axioms. As long as the axioms are consistent the logic system that it is built on will be consistent. No god needed

[@VOLKHVORONOVICH]

"It's wrong to beat up small children..." Yet, the Bible says " Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones." [Psalm 137:9] It is one thing to establish that there is an inherent moral compass. With a little bit of thought this is easily determined. But it is quite another thing to come to the conclusion that the one who gives this moral compass, is the God the Bible speaks of. This does not automatically follow.

[@Enigmatic_philosopher]

The argument you've presented is one that merges various theological and philosophical perspectives, including the cosmological argument, the argument from design, the argument from complexity, and the argument from morality. While these are all interesting perspectives, they also have been subjects of critique and counter-arguments. Let's explore each point separately. 1. **Explanation for Mathematical Constants and Something from Nothing:** This asserts that the complexity and precision of the universe, such as mathematical constants like pi or the gravitational constant, imply a designer. This is a form of the teleological argument (argument from design). However, the counter-argument is that it commits the fallacy of assuming complexity requires a designer. The precision we observe might be intrinsic to the nature of a coherent universe, not necessarily the result of conscious design. The question of how we got "something from nothing" is a deep philosophical and scientific one. There are cosmological theories, such as those involving quantum fluctuations, that suggest it's possible for a universe to arise from "nothing" in a quantum mechanical sense. To assert that "only a god could do this" is to make a claim beyond what we can empirically test or verify. 2. **DNA and Information:** The statement that "DNA can detract information but it can never add too" is not accurate. New information can and does arise in DNA through various mechanisms, such as gene duplication and subsequent mutation, or horizontal gene transfer in bacteria. 3. **Irreducible Complexity and Complexity of DNA:** The argument from irreducible complexity posits that certain biological systems are too complex to have evolved naturally. However, this argument has been widely critiqued in the scientific community. Evolutionary biologists have proposed numerous plausible pathways for the step-by-step evolution of seemingly "irreducibly complex" systems. The length of DNA, while impressive, doesn't necessarily imply a designer. The complexity of life, as encoded in DNA, is the result of billions of years of evolutionary processes, not a measure of initial design complexity. 4. **Glasses and Man-made Objects:** Comparing a biological organism to a man-made object, like glasses, is a false analogy. Man-made objects do not replicate or evolve, while organisms do. Evolution by natural selection is a well-supported explanation for the complex adaptation we see in the biological world. 5. **Basis for Morality:** The assertion that morality requires a divine lawgiver is a common argument, but it's not without counter-arguments. There are many philosophical frameworks for morality that don't rely on a deity, such as consequentialism (judging actions by their outcomes), deontology (judging actions by their adherence to rules), and virtue ethics (focusing on the development of moral character), among others. Additionally, many evolutionary biologists and psychologists argue that our moral instincts can be understood as a product of natural selection. For example, cooperation and empathy can be beneficial for the survival of social species, including humans. While these arguments bring up deep and fascinating questions, their conclusions are not the only possible interpretations of the observed facts. Many of their premises are challenged by scientific and philosophical scholarship. As with all such matters, open-minded and rigorous inquiry is key to understanding.

[@OhItsJustDrew]

Why would we decide to cook meat if our digestive systems were different

[@Jesuslovesyou.7]

Many scientists believe in God, I wonder why....

[@cameronadair5422]

Yes, I wonder why they 'say' they do or if they REALLY do. The story of god and creation is clearly a load of fictional nonsense.

[@Jesuslovesyou.7]

@@cameronadair5422 Why would so many of them lie about believing God when so much people believe that science contradicts the existence of God?

[@crystalnelson1775]

It doesn't matter weather you attend college or street pastor god used the both to bring the word to the people. College pastor or more have more etiquette and the word where the street pastor god blesses them with the word . The are both the same . You can tell you new pastor and the old past that are season . God loves them both and they are both anointed by God! God called them both to bring the good 📰 news to the people!

[@stevepierce6467]

Why doesn't god bring his word to the people. He hides away from us all, and has always done so. Could it be that maybe......he isn't real?

[@Generatorman59]

So here is the good news: Accept Jesus Christ as your personal Lord and Savior, or he will light you on fire.

[@stevepierce6467]

@@Generatorman59 And you know this to be true....how? There is nothing to indicate that there ever was a god-like character named jesus and that he ever condemned anyone to anything, fire or otherwise.

[@Generatorman59]

@@stevepierce6467 Yea... I was just being funny. I don't believe in any of that Jesus is my Savior hocus pocus nonsense. Sorry if I mislead you.

[@stevepierce6467]

@@Generatorman59 Good. I was a bit confused.

[@HypeItUp139]

💯💯💯Praise Jesus!

[@dannyhalder6513]

Hallelujah!!!

[@hummingbird_saltalamakia]

Seek the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth Aka absolute truth.

[@jamberry8026]

Mathematics is the purest form of truth known to man.

[@darrylelam256]

Why does math always come up with consistent answers? Because that's what we designed it to do.

[@guillermo3412]

Im still confused, how did math prove god in this video?

[@darrylelam256]

Because math works and dipsh!t here thinks that's not something that humans could come up with

[@SubJStan]

It didn’t

[@seanrath8268]

​@@darrylelam256God is a God of order and this proves that we have a creator who designed us

[@notsoaveragegamer5725]

​@@darrylelam256 such a respectful fella aint ya?

[@RobertZ1991]

I've read through a lot of these comments and my answer is very simple....If one could prove "God", there would be no such thing as "Faith".

[@jgsource552]

Faith, happiness, well being, choices, everything that makes who a person becomes is determined by the genetics the person is given, as well as their environment. To think people have true free will is nonsensical. And to think faith justifies believing in a God is nonsensical. No loving god would throw a person eternally to hell for being a product of what they were born with as well as their environment. You dont need any more proof than that

[@ikarooz]

We all find out if God exists, eventually.

[@paulwoo6735]

I hope that kid continues asking questions.

[@SecondChanceStrings]

We have a LOT more than 50 million cells...

[@billjohnson9472]

Wrong . differnt maths give different answers. For exsmple in spherical coordinates 1+1 can be anything between 0 and 2

[@doctormomentos2514]

1)in spherical coordinates 1+1=0 to 2 is always or 1+1=from 0 to 2 only sometimes. If in those coordinates 1+1=from 0 to 2 awlays thats constance. 2)we all say that 1+1 is 2 but you said here 1+1 can be from 0 to 2, again 2 is included here. Constance

[@billjohnson9472]

@@doctormomentos2514 so we agree that 2 is only one of the many answers that are possible. different definitions of the sphere radius change the answer. if the sphere radius is a variable the answer changes.

[@doctormomentos2514]

@@billjohnson9472 you said that its 0-2 or it can be even 1+1=4 or 37?

[@billjohnson9472]

@@doctormomentos2514 yes, in hyperbolic spaces. (aka Lobachevsy space) That is, if the 'number line' is non-linear . Our "Euclidean" space is only one special case for space, and space/time is in general non-Euclidean.

[@doctormomentos2514]

@@billjohnson9472 so in those spaces 1+1 can be =37?

[@seanrathmakedisciples1508]

Our God is a God of order and God never changes.

[@axelwiden-thulin9423]

Evolution works this way. If your mom and your dad has brown hair, you will most likely be born with brown hair, right? So lets make a different example here. A giraffe. We have 2 giraffes. One with a short neck, and one with a long neck. The one with the short neck can’t get any food from the trees, since they are 2 high up, therefore he can’t reproduce. The one with the tall neck survives, since it can reach the food. Then it meets a similar giraffe, and they reproduce. The baby giraffe will most likely have a tall neck, and it can also survive, and do the same thing, while the short neck giraffes die out.

[@ndustries6323]

That’s not what microevolution is.

[@TheFreshPrinceofEvergreen]

I disagree. Microevolution is the process of adaptability within a species, over the course of many years. The college student in the video described this clearly and concisely. There is quite a lot of evidence to back it up, such as Darwin's studies on Galapagos finches.

[@LA-hx8gj]

If you want to make a mathematics argument to justify God, just reference the book Darwin's Doubt. It statistically disproves the Cambrian Explosion theory.

[@IAmAlpharius20]

the Cambrian Explosion was discovered YEARS after Darwin lol keep making up things.

[@LA-hx8gj]

@@IAmAlpharius20 it's apparent you have no idea what I'm referring to or what the context of the title is.

[@LA-hx8gj]

@@IAmAlpharius20 what happened? Did you get embarrassed and erase your comment?

[@IAmAlpharius20]

@@LA-hx8gj you don't see it?

[@LA-hx8gj]

@@IAmAlpharius20 it's gone for me.

[@FlyingGentile]

O boi the comments is like a hornet’s nest…..don’t hit that reply button! 😂

[@davidsheriff9274]

But the Bible doesn't say beating up small children is wrong,in fact, the Bible says that if a child is disobedient to his parents, the parents are to take that child into the village to be stoned to death,so the Bible not only doesn't say that it's wrong to beat up a child,it condones the murder of children. If you don't believe me, read Deuteronomy 22:18 -21. The guy in the video doesn't know what he is talking about.

[@Flaystray]

Title: Math proves God 1/6 of video: Math constants proves God exists (just not the speed of light, carbon decay, or any other physical constants that threaten my religion (hint: it's all of them) but we won't talk about that) 5/6 of video: Appeal to my weird, out dated assumption of probability that evolution is unlikely because I think everything is so perfect

[@RobertZ1991]

he never said he didnt believe in evolutionhe said that there was a "guiding hand" in it...

[@cleo7066]

@@RobertZ1991in an age where certainty isn’t present, theory is blinding. just believe in science and we will eventually see. fund science. let’s see if this man in the sky exists or not.

[@4ndytrout46]

​@@RobertZ1991 what are you talking about? Todd Friel does not believe in evolution. This is not a secret. He says in this very video that he believes we were created as we are.

[@xoppa09]

why does a universe that started randomly preclude the possibility of constants. as an example, consider definitions. "All bachelors are unmarried". This is a constant, as long as we keep using the word bachelor consistently to mean unmarried.

[@bettyrubble9420]

That was brilliant, I enjoyed it so much I listened to it twice

[@Godcodex77]

Math proves God 1. Apply the alphabet to Messiah, Jesus, Christ. 2. Add digits, ( smaller #) add letters, bigger # 3. Add Jesus digit by digit = 29 29 x 6 fills up everything. 174 1189 Messiah 47 74 118 Jesus 29 74 x Christ 41 + 77 4. Add 41 + 77 for middle chapter of Bible. 8 5. 41 x 29 for total bible chapters 89 6. Remove 8 h, 9 i, 9 s, From messiah. 7. Remove 8 from H and 9 from I in Christ 8. Remove 2, 9, from Jesus , remove 77 from Christ and 1. = 26 9.Use the 26 and create 26 spaces. This secret hidden phrase will have 26 letters. A~Z 10.Add up all numbers = 109. Now you have enough (109) for revelation 4:4, throne, 24 elders, 24 seats, 7 lamps, 4 beasts, 24 wings, 7 eyes, 7 horns. 11.Reverse 🔄 Christ Jesus messiah to spell out. ( note rising) this message is meant to be writin ✍️ from bottom up. I am Christ King Jesus Mesaiah I Every # number should be accounted for. 29th prime is 109. I am Christ King Jesus messiah I = 1534 Hebrew

[@geneimprov-uc9pr]

This is an excellent series. In the old days one thought about theses things in college per se.

[@iriemon1796]

Argument: There cannot constants in math or science without God. Because we evolved randomly, there would not be any constants. Nothing is certain because of evolution. What? if there is evolution, 2+2 cannot equal 4? That gibberish doesn't even begin to make sense.

[@helpology]

The Helpology™ Question™ h?™ “What’s the MOST HELPFUL & SIMPLEST WAY that WORKS?”™

[@Ukuleleman64]

I like to use pizza as an example of God being real. I just ask any none believer to find a pizza tree in nature, if they can I will become an atheist.

[@micpie9480]

?

[@javadusk9721]

Excellently articulated Todd 👏👏👏

[@jgsource552]

This does make a good point, but it still doesn't prove that God exists. We are not yet at the point where we can prove or disprove God.

[@christopherburrell7618]

I think arguing for or against evolution is the most useless debate we can have And it only deters many intellectuals from coming to Christ I like Frank Turek’s view that even if evolution were true, it wouldn’t negate anything in the Bible The most important source of information comes from the Bible and provides true wisdom But God is majestic and he can create anything to appear as old as he wants. In Peter it says to God a day is a thousand years and a thousand years a day. The inherent complex bio mechanical and chemical properties governing our molecular interactions ultimately producing emergent (encompassing population and individual) functional properties in accordance to survivability and inheritance only adds to support God as our creator given the astronomic probability of these molecular interactions/changes and time frame required for the evolution of such complex traits to occur. The biochemical mechanism of change is a complex topic that couldn’t be covered in this comment but includes codons/anticodons, translation, transcription, epigenetic alterations, post translational modifications, mutations. For a gain of function positive trait to occur is significantly rare and to lead to complex change more often takes an astronomical amount of time. To accept this I think would still require God to guide and direct such a process

[@thekatarnalchemist]

I have to disagree with your statement "even if evolution were true, it wouldn’t negate anything in the Bible." The account of creation as given in Genesis is very different from the one postulated by evolutionists. For example, it asserts that death did not enter the world until Humanity had been created and nothing died until the first humans sinned against God's commands. Evolution, on the other hand, functions on the idea that as various mutations and adaptations prove to be useful or useless, and the organisms perish accordingly so that the unwanted mutations are weeded out and the beneficial ones are retained. For evolution to function, death must always have been apart of existence, and therefore not connected with sin in any way. The theory of evolution is not compatible with the doctrine that God created the universe and the traditional Christian understanding of the nature of sin and its origin. I find some of the ideas of evolution to be helpful and explaining how things like heredity and selective breeding work, but it has no answer as to the ultimate origin of existence and the life therein. Ironically, it was a Catholic monk who discovered heredity and helped codify selective breeding, Gregor Mendel. Darwin took his ideas and ran with it to an extreme conclusion in my opinion. I find the doctrine of divine creation to be far more comprehensive in terms of explaining everything, not just the development of organic life but also the conditions of which we find ourselves as people. I don't claim to understand the mechanism by which God may have done that, though; that's where faith comes in. Even so, it's that understanding of an orderly, coherence, and comprehensible universe that was the impetus for the development of science, and that understanding is only found in Christianity.

[@adiraifidi]

@@thekatarnalchemistI kinda disagree with you here. I get where you’re coming from but you’ve misunderstood. Sin brought death to humans, not to everything else. I mean yes human beings make choices that cause death to things but in the sense, you’re talking about, sin brought death to humans. Also, evolution still agrees with the bible, when you study the scriptures you come to discover the creation story isn’t God making the earth from thin air or scratch, It said the earth was without form and void, so in simplest terms everything was out of order, things were lifeless, which suggests well death. When you study the scriptures you realize that there was a world that existed before the creation story, and God wasn’t trying to hide that, now that I think about it’s really clear, or maybe just to me but I hope you get the point.

[@NaN-noCZ]

Irreducible complexity is a flawed theory in that everything in our bodies evolved to be this way based off our need for nutrition and means to process that nutrition to survive. We evolved these attributes through mutation and through changing our own behavior over generations; cancer, for example, is a mutation, and it is living proof of how evolution works. Now the idea that we have so much very complex DNA that it’s impossible for us to comprehend the scale of it is true, but that doesn’t mean that a deity made it, that simply means we didn’t, and no one is proposing that. As for morality, evidence points to it just being principles we made up based on instinct, and that’s why different cultures throughout history have had vastly different ideas of what is moral and amoral, and arguing that morality is constant simply doesn’t make sense when we’re, for example, working on solving slavery and discrimination against LGBT and minorities, all three of which were considered a-okay a few hundred years back.

[@jordonyang8]

Hey this is at my school!!! Go dawgs!!

[@gregl9175]

Which dogs? Georgia bulldogs, Hoyas bulldogs , fresno st bulldogs?

[@ucru]

~2:25 - You can, through independent assortment and crossing over, DNA can be manipulated through translocation, deletion, replication, and others modes. This is called a mutation in our DNA. Evolutionary has been a try repeat process.

[@luzysal7589]

Wow, wow, and wow!!! Praise the Lord JesusChrist!

[@geneimprov-uc9pr]

Hey, micro evolution is natural selection that Darwin wrote about. He never used the word evolution. Smart student.

[@DerekPK]

For some reason the subtitles are in Korean

[@nonsensicalwebby1663]

Why are there only 16 comments?

[@JontheBerean]

I've noticed some of my comments are removed . . . censorship

[@OnioNSquid]

Because you were early

[@casparuskruger4807]

Despite whatever your parents ever told you, God not only does not logically exist -- God cannot possibly exist logically. God is claimed to be an immaterial; conscious entity that created all of material existence. Consciousness requires existence for that consciousness to exist at all, in that the idea of any entity capable of being conscious requires some existence to be conscious OF. If there is is nothing to perceive, there is nothing to form concepts--the very things required to possess any form of consciousness Kinda hard thing to do for a claimed conscious entity --that is claimed to have created all of existence, isn't it? SIMPLY PUT The very things that god is claimed to have created are the very things that were required to exist BEFORE God could ever logically exist Himself.

[@BEhistoricStudios]

as a muslim = 100% agree. God bless yall

[@ModerateMic]

God Bless!

[@Its_angxlaz]

Trust in Jesus my friend.He knows you and loves you.Offering the gift of salvation we've all fallen short of the Gods standard.But if no one told you today pick up your cross today and know that Jesus is God and that he is the truth the way and life.God bless you may your heart be not of stone and you accept Jesus in your heart to be changed.

[@BEhistoricStudios]

@@Its_angxlaz I accept jesus as the Messiah and a prophet, but he cannot be god simply because god does not beget and nor is he begotten. All prophets sent down to man came to talk about the 1 god. Thats why the 1 god is the first commandement. Thou shall have no other Gods but me. Not jesus, but God. Moses didnt know the name Jesus. Modern christianity should be called Paulism because you believe more in Paul than jesus himself who said: "THERE IS NO OTHER GOD BUT GOD" and" I THROUGH MYSELF CANNOT DO NOTHING! But through the permission of God". Only a man under command of God can say this. Its obvious Mohammed is the last of the abrahamitic prophets and the seal of all prophets. What God prays to himself for the earthly need of bread? Please... I respect whatever you want to believe but to me Paulism (christianity) makes absolutely no sense what so ever. (thats why its dying out and islam is on the rise)

[@BEhistoricStudios]

@@Its_angxlaz why should I pick up the cross ? the means of execution for Jesus? You think an innocent prisoner who died in an electric chair would like to have his supporters waving elctric chair figurines ? I thought so...

[@goldeneev4491]

@@BEhistoricStudios Euphrates river has been dried believe in JESUS NOW.

[@iriemon1796]

"No new information gets added when DNA changes" What? That is nonsensical. If a parent DNA sequence says GATCCY and the offspring changes to GATCGY, that is new information. There are billions of base pairs of DNA. The number of conigurations for DNA is infinite. Of course there are combinations in new sequences which contain new information. Where do these guys get this information?

[@daviddavenport9350]

Subtraction of DNA material is also major change!

[@Nicolae_Mew]

PROOF THAT GOD EXISTS: "DNA is a little bit sus" - woah, nice proof bro

[@raisondetre.Is53]

This is beautifully and clearly put!

[@kurman4749]

It is IMPOSSIBLE to prove the supernatural, and it NEVER will be proved.

[@daviddidder3781]

Yes. It’s called the mandelbrot set.

[@DJK-cq2uy]

It seems this preacher talks down to people. I'm sure Jesus is proud

[@slowtyper95]

Man everything is too much to be called coincidence tbh. Like you have your earbrow so water doesn't fall to your eyes. Eyelid so you can protect one of your weakest part of your body. Nose "build" facing downward

[@Generatorman59]

Is it also too much of a coincidence that 99.9999% of the universe is uninhabitable? Is it also too much of a coincidence that there are more than 300,000 children diagnosed with cancer each year? Is it also too much of a coincidence that there exist a parasite whose only known purpose is to cause blindness in its host? Is it also too much of a coincidence that there exist genetic mutations that causes babies to be born an invalid? Is it also too much of a coincidence that a 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami claimed 230,000 lives?

[@slowtyper95]

@@Generatorman59 if you talk about bad things that happen in life, thats a whole different topic. But disease and such already exists in old testement

[@Generatorman59]

@@slowtyper95 But disease and such still exists today, and we are not living in Old Testament times. And besides, if you want to talk about coincidences, why limit your points to something positive? I mean, why count the 'hits' and ignore the 'misses'? Are you trying to build a case to show God's love and perfection? If you are, then wouldn't be fair to see both sides of the argument?

[@slowtyper95]

@@Generatorman59 i believe God is love and perfection. You brought up the bad things to justify the God existing which is kinda irrelevant with my first comment tbh. But God existent doesn't mean everything will runs fine, no bad people and no calamity and such. Or do you think that bad things happen = no god?

[@Generatorman59]

@@slowtyper95 I was just wondering how anyone could possibly have the opinion that God is love and perfection when he causes babies to be born with cancer, for example. Do we just ignore that fact and just praise him for our eyebrows? That's what you seem to suggest. I have no reason to believe this God of the bible is real. It has absolutely nothing to do with bad things happening.

[@blainenewton7188]

Todd, with all due respect, you're way off on the number of cells in the human body. The correct number is somewhere around 30 trillion, not 50 million.

[@jameshardy8074]

He look like the dude off ready player one

[@Alice-hm9oj]

Sacred geometry. YHWH = TETRAGRAMMATON

[@kimsahl8555]

The law of Nature run the Universe.

[@daviddavenport9350]

The universe is the way it is because it is the only universe we have....we have nothing to compare it to..the rest is just hot air!

[@kregorovillupo3625]

Wow Todd, what an arrogant display of nonsense. You do really don't know any better.

[@SplitTheSea]

Wonderful breakdown

[@OnioNSquid]

Well maybe God made everything evolve in this way so it can be both evolution and God that made us

[@danmalone8378]

Well luckily, God gave us His word that actually tells us exactly how He formed us and everything. It wasn't evolution.

[@OnioNSquid]

@@danmalone8378 it was both

[@christislord2535]

@@OnioNSquidwe were made in an image. The only thing that has evolved is societies agendas to push certain beliefs. There’s only 4 MAYBE 5 generations of humans on Earth. Something happened in the 17/1800s

[@jameshines9330]

No such thing as evolution God is creator of the universe. Let God be the truth and every man a liar

[@OnioNSquid]

@@jameshines9330 did God write a book?

[@freddielittle9825]

Yes amen I can provide in gods word and prove with mathematics that Moses not only written the first five books of the bible and provide a prove God is true amen 🙏👍✅🦔🦅💯

[@freddielittle9825]

Yes and I can provide and prove it in the KJV of the holy bible amen

[@freddielittle9825]

If I was to show you it would blow your mind away that's if you actually believe in God and his word amen 🙏👍✅

[@4ndytrout46]

You're kidding right? Moses never existed. You can't even prove that much.

[@nramorrisg8415]

Our creator shows he exists everyday just in the laws of our planet with our moon in itself is perfect in their harmony together without the moon we couldn't survive just a small piece of evidence how everything else works together in harmony. Our Heavenly Father is who he says he is he is in all things of life we see everywhere. God aka I Am is our Master of everyone of us, but in his Magnificent Majestic in his Majesty God is all Glory who is pure love that's not just beautiful but magnificent because he's so gentle and precious of loving us dearly with pure love. I feel so bad for those who don't know our creator who loves us so much our Father of all his children the only one that you know that really loves you don't turn your back on him and miss out on the best love you'll ever know for internity. All the glory goes to God his Glory reflects on us and it all comes down to love.

[@Daymoon5964]

amen🙏🏾🙏🏾

[@kidsliketolearn]

I was enjoying that video till it ended. Where’s the rest

[@godlinesstv671]

Existence of God (Yahweh) need no proof again because I wonder why humanity should doubt the existence of the who brought them. No one doubts the mother who gave birth to him but why do people doubt the one who placed them in their mother's womb? It's earlier better to accept Christ and live for Him than later. God is with us at all cost and the same way a new Born baby in the womb never expected to be on an Earth like this because he felt the womb would have been the last place but surely came after birth and witnessed the earth and every pattern of his way of feeding and life changes on earth from the womb same way mankind will see the afterlife after death. Judgement is real and unless one accept Jesus Christ, he or she can't be saved. God has proven more than enough to be with us.

[@pajamajordan2991]

There’s a lot wrong here Starting with the microphones 😊

[@markporalest]

2:43 dna spell YAHWEH -> YHWH 🤜🙏☝️🙏

[@maxoblivion]

Yeah, we can suggest that mathematical order implies design but to conclude that our world was created by a "very intelligent powerful being" is absurd. Being implies nonbeing. Is the creator of our world finite? Is the "creator" separate from the "creation"? Let's face it folks, we don't know the answers to these questions and it's only our fear and stupidity that compels us to believe that we do. But enjoy the circus. 🤡

[@hummingbird_saltalamakia]

Yeshua Ha'Mashiach et Adonai

[@rogeralaniz2205]

Adam and eve not science

[@fireballxl-5748]

Todd, I admire you and praise God for what you do. Don't agree with everything and would greatly desire a short (I promise it would be short and polite) conversation with you. Would you be willing? Post a junk email or ask me to do so and publish it here. I live in Pennsylvania so I doubt we could meet. But I do love you and the work you do for the LORD.

[@DJK-cq2uy]

🤣 at you n thus simpleton

[@Bennyboy210]

You said "there are 50 million cells in our body give or take ".... there are over 30 trillion. So u just make sht up

[@mogdor]

I agree that there is good evidence to support an intelligence behind the universe, aka God. I don't think there's really much evidence to support very specific, supernatural things that are claimed in the Bible and in all the various religions. People believe these things just because it's written in a really old book and a lot of people told them to believe it. That's not good enough for me. But as for a an intelligent God who created the universe, yes I think that's a logical thing to believe, based on the order and complexity of the universe.

[@mariamfernandez3772]

Amen ❤

[@numberLuan]

Not a big crowd

[@Edwin-pw7cu]

💯

[@jimmythedog2882]

50 trillion

[@subodhmishra3214]

What most amuses me is that seemingly regular people are having serious conversations about mythical gods and religions that had no prehistoric beginnings and were never discovered.Nonetheless, I doubt that humans would have had time to discuss anything other than how to survive in difficult environments given the duration of human history-millions of years. Moreover, no excavation has uncovered any proof of modern gods or faiths. Thus, God God might just be a lighthearted pastime.

[@vancebrown5357]

Who or what made God i know someone will say God always existed but you know something can't come from nothing so there for god couldn't just existed something else's made God so on and so on.

[@potsbaker]

drugs are a helluva drug

[@supershadow1053]

Cant believe I just wasted 6 minutes of my life just to hear some guy make an arguement from complexity.

[@fromthepeanutgallery1084]

No experience is wasted. Illumination from it may come to its culmination a decade or two later.

[@supershadow1053]

@@fromthepeanutgallery1084 ty captain may but alot of things 'may' happen, it doesnt mean much until it does

[@Generatorman59]

There are so many things that I can say about this video. But, I will just start out by asking if God is the standard of what is right and wrong, then why can't he abide by his own standards? This God of the bible has done some pretty vile and disgusting things by his own standards, and we are supposed to be good with that?

[@danceslob6211]

Imagine telling God that he's vile and disgusting. That's like an ant telling a human what to do.

[@funtlickerシ]

your basing what you think is vile and disgusting on Gods actions. You are describing what God is doing based on what you think is vile and disgusting. I also want to know some verses from the bible that you think contradicts Gods standards I would like to try and answer. thank you for reading.

[@Generatorman59]

@@danceslob6211 Sorry, I'm just not see the analogy about an ant and a human. If an intelligent ant witnesses a human doing something vile and disgusting, couldn't an ant say something like, "Gee, that seems vile and disgusting."? Hey, I am not able to reply to funtlicker for some reason. KZbin won't save my comment to him. So, I am editing this comment and hopefully he will read it: Well, there are many instances where I can choose from. Let's start with the fact that God tells us not to murder, but what did God do to children in their sleep after taking Pharaoh’s free will away from him? Or, how about what God commanded of King Saul to do to the Amalekites: I Samual 15:3 - Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.

[@charbelhannoush]

@@Generatorman59 Is God immoral for judging human beings? No. Can God take away life from someone? Yes, he is also the one that gave that life. With your argumentation you would call God disgusting for taking any life for that matter, even from a 120yo man. So is God immoral for taking life from wicked and sinful people? No. Actually he should kill you and me in this very moment, because of the amount of sin we have practised in our lives, wich is an abomination to a Holy and righteous God. You can see, with death, that God is very serious about sin, we deserve death because of it. So repent, turn away from sin and turn in faith to God. He will forgive and clean you of all unrighteousness because of his grace and mercy. For Christ took upon himself your sin and died under God's righteous wrath so you could be brought back to God and live with him forever

[@Callmecurt_]

Read the Bible bro and pray to God urself, u can’t call a just and Perfect God disgusting

[@dreamsaresharedhere_]

So well said wow. Mind blowing

[@michaelanderson4849]

As usual, the Jeezbuz guy does not even have a working understanding of the scientific models he's soo sure he's disproving. If you expect me to present biblical texts correctly when I claim that the whole shebang is nonsense, how come you don't even bother to present the scientific models correctly as you try to do the same? A wee bit of double standard perhaps laddie?

[@IAmAlpharius20]

You sound salty. Reverting to personal attacks, much?

[@michaelanderson4849]

@@IAmAlpharius20 This was no attack on his person. Perhaps you should read what I wrote once more?

[@IAmAlpharius20]

@@michaelanderson4849 you called him Jeezbuzz guy lol

[@michaelanderson4849]

@@IAmAlpharius20 so? Pray tell me, how is that an attack on his person? He deliberately aims for public attention peddling his particular flavor of Jeezbuz mythology.

[@IAmAlpharius20]

@@michaelanderson4849 calling someone's beliefs a myth is an insult lol. How'd you like it if I called evolution a myth made up a racist old white guy?