сша победили германию и японию. ссср в войне не участвовал или участвовал на стороне германии. учите историю по учебникам сша и вопросы вроде ваших отпадут сами собой. preview.redd.it/tmrogyhcwsz21.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=fb7235dc76c3d1c3a2cf98e576c0b499b9831156
@isni19465 жыл бұрын
@@leeharveyoslik сша победили германию и японию. ссср в войне не участвовал или участвовал на стороне германии. учите историю по учебникам сша и вопросы вроде ваших отпадут сами собой.
@viktorshevchenko38885 жыл бұрын
What keeps you from making this sort of a video, where you could place all the planes you wished?
@MrDaron7775 жыл бұрын
Don't forget the tu-4
@rhino2695 жыл бұрын
No Heinkel HE-111? No Dornier Do 17 and no Ju 52?
@PolarGabriel5 жыл бұрын
Junkers 52 was actually a transport plane
@rhino2695 жыл бұрын
@@PolarGabriel true, however, it was converted into a bomber
@shubhamburman90044 жыл бұрын
And where is fw 200 Condor
@лолок-я3д4 жыл бұрын
And where is Pe-8?
@vad-asz4 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/door/yfMybtJZkgqXmQVRlr1hYA
@veggieboyultimate Жыл бұрын
These ww2 plane designs are admittedly cool
@citizenblue5 жыл бұрын
1:36 F4F Wildcat needs a horizontal stabilizer
@aviation_fan23615 жыл бұрын
Fail
@peerappel20125 жыл бұрын
lol
@Razor-gx2dq5 жыл бұрын
Lol
@josanjosan5 жыл бұрын
Lol
@DividedByZeero5 жыл бұрын
And back wings
@garyevans34215 жыл бұрын
A lot of difference making aircraft missing. No Dauntless divebomber, no Stuka, no Sturmovich Il 2 and they may not be bombers, but the Pacific War would’ve been impossible without the humble DC3 and the lifesaving Catalina PBY
@barfuss20075 жыл бұрын
@Gary Evans and Ju 52 or He 177 (divebomber!) Länge: 22,00 m Spannweite: 31,44 m Höhe: 6,93 m Leermasse: 16.800 kg max. Startmasse: 31.000 kg V-Max. bei 6100 m: 488 km/h max. Reichweite: 5500 km (mit zwei Hs 293A als Außenlast)
@jameson12395 жыл бұрын
barfuss2007 the HE177 was not a dive bomber it was a heavy bomber
@inewyorkcentralrr5 жыл бұрын
barfuss2007 huh ok, sure pal. “Dive bomber” lol!
@YvanR0Y5 жыл бұрын
@@barfuss2007 Originally there were attempts to build the the He 177 to be used as a dive bomber, but that was eventually dropped. No pun intended, ja.
@DumpsterFire_DD2145 жыл бұрын
No b25, b26, condor, wellington, etc. Missing alot of big names in here for sure
@30AndHatingIt5 жыл бұрын
I had no idea the Hellcat was that big... I thought it was a smaller fighter, guess not! That thing was a beast!
@lernaeanhydra5766 Жыл бұрын
I had no idea the Stirling was so massive, dwarfs all the early war bombers.
@steveroberts61185 жыл бұрын
Missing the Republic P47 Thunderbolt & CAC Boomerang
@pokeyrailfanning5 жыл бұрын
The p-47 is not considered a bomber nonetheless less a fighter
@yogibearthebear67745 жыл бұрын
PokeCollector then why’s the typhoon in there.
@fs20005 жыл бұрын
B-25 would have been nice as well.
@pokeyrailfanning5 жыл бұрын
Lockheed Starfighter idk do I look like the creator of the video I think this guy means as in bombers all these planes could carry bombs but some were prone for fighting and other were prone to bombing like the b-29 and the bf-109 was prone for fighting.
@VRichardsn5 жыл бұрын
@@pokeyrailfanning _The p-47 is not considered a bomber nonetheless less a fighter_ What is it then? A refrigerator?
@IBViRUS5 жыл бұрын
great, you got some experimental planes that even haven't been used, but you excluded planes that took heavy part in that war (Il-2 for example and the most of soviet planes).
@Jan-cs4kw5 жыл бұрын
And most of the bigger german planes
@Flenders19835 жыл бұрын
Iljuschin Il-2 (36.163) and Messerschmitt BF109 (33.300) are some oft the most build planes ever. Compare to North American P51 Mustang (15.858) or Grumman F4F (7.722)
@franken07025 жыл бұрын
0:26 bf 109 is there
@MikoyanGurevich-xc7ft3 жыл бұрын
ofc because americans dont want to see the Soviet aircraft high up on the list. notice how its mainly US planes in the top 10?
@suzukirider90303 жыл бұрын
Включая №2 который вообще-то не успел ко 2-ой мировой...
@phenixsus5 жыл бұрын
Polish bomber PZL.37 Łoś is missing 17,93m wingspan and 12,92m length also polish light bomber PZL.23 Karaś 13,95m wingspan and 9,68m lenght
@comandercarnis5 жыл бұрын
@Supreme Leader Kim Jong Un they used them like the rest of their air fleet
@RandomRyan19113 жыл бұрын
Had the privilege of seeing Lancasters, Spitfires/Hurricanes and a couple others like the P-51 flying at a local annual airshow. Even one of the Vulcan bomber's last flights. At the time they were a necessary evil but now they're really elegant pieces of history, so lucky to witness first-hand and still have a handful of the past's most famous planes flying today.
@valobrien95965 жыл бұрын
Another cool video AmazingViz! I'd say 80% of the comments are about missing airplanes, but you would have to make a 40 minute video to squeeze all of them in!
@paulc87545 жыл бұрын
Great piece of work; it matters little how many planes might be missing, most of the iconic planes are there. Thank you.
@oxbowxylophone63802 жыл бұрын
Ju 87
@WorkersofAmericaRise2 жыл бұрын
@@oxbowxylophone6380 dive bomber
@enderman81515 жыл бұрын
You had prototype XB-19 but not BV238 (the largest all metal plane of ww2)
@jaxinnnnn3 жыл бұрын
And the Pe-8!!! 😡😤
@pinkberet80125 жыл бұрын
Where is heinkel he 177
@thatdamngamers5 жыл бұрын
Or the heinkel 111, dornier 217 and junkers Ju87
@Jan-cs4kw5 жыл бұрын
The uhu is missing aswell
@bazd8845 жыл бұрын
Probably at the bottom of the English Channel.
@guppiapfeljustleopardthing18575 жыл бұрын
What about the stuka, me 262 in its bomber role or the german 6 motor passengerplane converted to a bomber?
@airestesshistory81005 жыл бұрын
Baz D And it’s on the Channel’s bottom after an engine fire.
@VforArt5 жыл бұрын
sadly theres no PZL Łoś or PZL Karaś bombers...... wished i could compare their size with other planes
@qzg78575 жыл бұрын
I was waiting for them. But i think they will be sloghtly bigger than bf110
@maddoxhill97735 жыл бұрын
I like how you can see Captain America at 3:02.
@tomflanker5 жыл бұрын
Missing the B-25 Mitchel, the stars of Tokyo raid
@itunesjoe5 жыл бұрын
You have missed out on the Catalina, Short Sunderland, Lysander
@bernardfrederic65354 жыл бұрын
Non of them is either a designated fighter, or bomber.
@MaxwellAerialPhotography2 жыл бұрын
AmazingViz: models 40+ aircraft The comments: oh you missed one obscure plane, you modelled one irrelevant detail incorrectly, aCsHuAlLy the wingspan of this plane is off by 0.1 metres.
@pytor87745 жыл бұрын
I mean if you're going by wing length then yeah the XB-19 is one of the largest, but if you're looking for one of the actually largest aircraft of ww2 go look at the Blom und Voss BV.238.
@salvage47835 жыл бұрын
Yep the most largest Plane ever And it's like a king of fortress
@randomuser54435 жыл бұрын
If he wants to include experimental then he can trash any reasonablily
@jowanharvey18745 жыл бұрын
Thank you you are a truly amazing person
@Flenders19835 жыл бұрын
@@randomuser5443 Douglas XB-19 ist an experimental plane too. Just one plane was build. If experimental Planes are included - there were a lot of "very big" german Planes. For example), Me 323 (55,24 m), Blohm und Voss BV 222 (46,0 m) also 6 engines, Heinkel He 274 (44,2 m), Messerschmitt Me 264 (43 m), He 111 Z (35,2 m). Some of them are also build a few dozen times. The biggest plane in WW2 is still Blohm und Voss BV 238 (60,71 m). But germans build also big planes in WW1 -> Zeppelin (Staaken) R.VI (42,2 m) in 1917.
@reid12835 жыл бұрын
Ethan ryan ramos The largest plane ever is the AN-225, the largest combat aircraft is the B-36
@ignasanchezl5 жыл бұрын
I love how people complain. Can you just appreciate this piece of free content that was provided to you?
@timothyirwin89745 жыл бұрын
Please, please tell me the software that produced these models. I am guessing they are Sketchup? Wildcat is missing stab BTW.
@McDuffee015 жыл бұрын
The Aircuda and Bearcat never saw combat in WW2! As well as YB-35 and XB-19!!!
@Hanz_Goober5 жыл бұрын
I mean... He never said (used in combat) he specifically said ww2 meaning during ww2
@octave38585 жыл бұрын
what is this shit you just posted still doesn’t explain why he would include the YB-35 when its first flight was at 1946
@firepower70175 жыл бұрын
@@Hanz_Goober So by your dumb logic we would be missing the P-80 Shooting Star, MIG-9 and Gloster Meteor
@pickeljarsforhillary1025 жыл бұрын
P-80 did see service in Italy before the war ended.
@firepower70175 жыл бұрын
@@pickeljarsforhillary102 That was reconnaissance and besides it would've fit the role of scout plane not a fighter
@shinkreytpuylap4 жыл бұрын
2:07 The F6F Hellcat is a torpedo bomber, though it can only carry one
@ethansgamingchannel70773 жыл бұрын
Don't you mean Carrier Fighter ?
@randomusername66563 жыл бұрын
The F6F is.... a torpedo bomber...?
@throttleblipsntwistedgrips19923 жыл бұрын
Pretty sure you're thinking of the TBM Avenger
@aperson3253 жыл бұрын
It technically can carry torpedoes but then it would be a torpedo fighter
@michaelmckinnon15913 жыл бұрын
You're thinking of the TBD and the TBF/TBM
@blitz84252 жыл бұрын
its crazy how big the p-61 was, especially considering how maneuverable it reportedly was.
@Danny-zi6xw5 жыл бұрын
Yes, it is WW2 based ya kno- "Northrop YB-35 First flight - 1946"
@viruspter1dactl4 жыл бұрын
Lolz
@firstduckofwellington68893 жыл бұрын
@@viruspter1dactlIt was developed during the war
@viruspter1dactl3 жыл бұрын
@@firstduckofwellington6889 i was loling him becouse of his ignorence thinking a plane can be make in a year
@firstduckofwellington68893 жыл бұрын
@@viruspter1dactl oh sorry this wasn’t meant to be directed at you. Also planes such as the g91 and p80 were developed in much less than a year.
@viruspter1dactl3 жыл бұрын
@@firstduckofwellington6889 yes i know but such things as a yb35 need more then a year
@VRichardsn5 жыл бұрын
Plenty of aircraft missing, my friend. Nice details with Wonder Woman and Captain America, though.
@azekilldiablo93155 жыл бұрын
And the BV238? One of largest WW2 planes! 66m wingspan!
@thejupitergod56875 жыл бұрын
Azekill Diablo it was a transport plane XD, it also did nothing during the war...
@azekilldiablo93155 жыл бұрын
@@thejupitergod5687 It did fight and was shot down by american planes. And it has a large bombload. And lots of defensive turrets.
@MrMort1707995 жыл бұрын
@@thejupitergod5687 its started as a transport but a few where fitted to be bomber but if your going the yb38 should not be there as its a prototype
@dirkvanhaperen5 жыл бұрын
There was only 1 bv 238 build togheter with 2 prototypes. The bv 238 was unable to carry bomb loads and had no turrets mounted on the plane. The 2 prototypes never saw flight and only 1 of them was completed after the war, the only flying bv 238 was sunk by the germans to prevent capture. The only version with bombs and turrets is from a game called war thunder, this version of the plane never existed and is a fictional build, you can find that information on their WT wiki page. You can find blue prints of the only flying bv on the internet, and i'm sorry to crush your dream but it never saw combat, had no guns and was unable to bomb/carry bombs. These facts are colleted from historical documentations and from the wt wiki forums.
@MrMort1707995 жыл бұрын
@@dirkvanhaperen oops got it mixed up with the bv222 which did have defensive gunners
@robo65485 жыл бұрын
Very enjoyable, I liked your choice of aircraft!
@tralfazsteamboat56955 жыл бұрын
Would be a good video if there’s was more detail in the aircraft and what country used them.
@fishlishswish27423 жыл бұрын
these models look great!!! good job!
@BenjWarrant5 жыл бұрын
How can a plane that had its first flight in 1946 have anything to do with WW2?
@Jermster_915 жыл бұрын
Maybe began development during WW2?
@airestesshistory81005 жыл бұрын
It was designed during the war, but I agree it would have been better to reserve it for another video.
@Myreactionwhen_800855 жыл бұрын
@John Small The war lasted about 7 years and the US was in the war 5 years. It was an allied victory and millions died for that victory the US didn't just say they won after like a year. Fix your grammer and knowledge on history and maybe your opinion will be respected.
@longbar23445 жыл бұрын
@@Jermster_91 doesn't count though
@guttisingh80293 жыл бұрын
The Boeing P-26 "Peashooter" was the first American production all-metal fighter aircraft and the first pursuit monoplane to enter squadron service with the United States Army Air Corps. Wikipedia Top speed: 377 km/h Retired: 1957 Engine type: Pratt & Whitney R-1340 Wasp Unit cost: 14,009-14,009 USD Manufacturer: Boeing First flight: 20 March 1932
@JH-lo9ut4 жыл бұрын
Very cool! Could it be possible to view these models in an interactive 3D enviroment?
@ContendCreators Жыл бұрын
War thunder.
@worldwideinterests1 Жыл бұрын
Captain America jumping into the back of the jeep next to the B-17 was a nice Easter egg.
@N.E.M1075 жыл бұрын
There's a hole on your left wing
@RagavJanardhan4 жыл бұрын
Thank you war thunder
@rlccar8518 Жыл бұрын
Very nice, but one suggestion. Don't fade out just as you're showing them all together :)
@stealthpilot63285 жыл бұрын
3:28 What we call it in real life: Northrop YB-35 What we call it in Ace Combat 7: The Arsenal Bird.
@jimbojo665 жыл бұрын
Captain America next to the B-17 BEAUTIFUL thank you
@piotrszczepanek48125 жыл бұрын
Polish medium bomber PZL.37 "Łoś" (Moos)? Polish light bomber PZL.23 "Karaś" (Crucian)? Were is this?
@profesorkrugow73885 жыл бұрын
No po prostu zapomnieli o nas
@piotrszczepanek48125 жыл бұрын
@@profesorkrugow7388 - nie tylko o nas jak widzę. Nie ma też kilku radzieckich, niemieckich, amerykańskich, włoskich czy francuskich choćby...
@profesorkrugow73885 жыл бұрын
Zgadzam się
@bluelightno1765 жыл бұрын
Ju 88, ju 87, b 25, b 18, p 47, yak 9, pe 3, pe 9, and sbd dauntless just to name a few that were missed
@TestandRecognise5 жыл бұрын
1:36 Definitely that Wildcat can fly.
@vaapps5 жыл бұрын
I love you for doing this
@maureencora15 жыл бұрын
No B-25 or B-26?
@kingcrafttrex42555 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video because I like it
@kingcrafttrex42555 жыл бұрын
You forgot The B-17G
@ludoslt37465 жыл бұрын
When you forgot french air force
@diegoroberto13474 жыл бұрын
You mean:🏳️air Force
@ludoslt37464 жыл бұрын
@Ceffereno Rivera you responds like a fan of history.... wait no
@ludoslt37464 жыл бұрын
@@diegoroberto1347 ah ah ah funny. But you insult lot of men who died with this false belief
@JohnSmith-gu1dq4 жыл бұрын
Surrend-air force
@lechardonrouge61723 жыл бұрын
@@JohnSmith-gu1dq 🤡🤡
@tinacao58723 жыл бұрын
This plane collection is cool, I WANT ONE
@sweetdaddydee13145 жыл бұрын
So you title the vid a ww2 fighter and bomber and fighter size quiz when u addd one that had its first flight in 1946... hmmmmm I'm pretty sure ww2 ended in 1945 not 1946
@superwogwog96655 жыл бұрын
sweetdaddydee 1 there was a few jagdtiger tanks that fought on after 1945 but yea...
@SR71ABCD3 жыл бұрын
what's up with that F4F Wildcat the tail has something missing?
@ak-pulkaal-kuwait77435 жыл бұрын
Main sturm bomber ww2 IL-2
@barfuss20074 жыл бұрын
Yes, a very important airplane in WW2
@mattdotsonrailfanproductio2664 жыл бұрын
Those b-24s are awesome aircrafts. They’re one of my favorites
@ruslime48215 жыл бұрын
What about Soviet bombers Pe-8 (39m) and some smaller great planes as Il-2, or frontline bombers??
@thunberbolttwo39535 жыл бұрын
The Gruman F8F Bearcat is not a WW2 plane.It was designed during the war.But only saw service after the war.
@3HOCFRESKO5 жыл бұрын
where is the romanian IAR 80/81?? is this top a joke or what?
@JUNKERS4885 жыл бұрын
At 1:36 What happened to the F4F Wildcats Horizontal stabilizers and elevators? Otherwise It's a great video. Thank you for posting. Why didn't you include the Luftwaffe's largest bomber the HE177A-5?
@lightmetal96235 жыл бұрын
German, Japanese and Soviet aircraft are very poorly represented. If the author has no other 3d models in stock, then it was necessary to limit himself to only American and British aircraft in the collection.
@MsLegaC Жыл бұрын
What a cool graphic!!
@alejandrocantu46525 жыл бұрын
Your ranking system is pathetic the two Polish aircraft and not one single French aircraft, plus you ranking system is crazy. To are many good examples of aircraft missing from your list.
@thunberbolttwo39535 жыл бұрын
Plus 2 planes that never saw combatr.One that saw service after the war.
@martijn95685 жыл бұрын
And 0 dutch airplanes, also Czech aircraft that were used by Slovakia. Also no Romanian aircraft or Yugoslavian ones.
@catalincalifar29735 жыл бұрын
Romanian figther IAR 80 Good figther from early Day of WW 2
@mleo64775 жыл бұрын
Hola tengo 60 años y nunca e visto de cerca ni mucho menos me e subido en alguno gracias a tus vídeos hoy los conosco
@theknight83405 жыл бұрын
Where is Pe-8(Length 23.59, Wingspan 39.01)
@twitch19653 жыл бұрын
Too bad you didn't put normal units next to the SI units, it would just be nice to know how large or small some of those craft actually were.
@ContendCreators Жыл бұрын
Metres are better friend
@slugofthesea93715 жыл бұрын
Where’s my boy junkers ju87!?
@narutouzumaki50935 жыл бұрын
Where Is The Nakajima E8N & Nakajima E4N...???...
@darkfunewolfcoop67685 жыл бұрын
0 French plane... Because everyone know they don't fight this war ...
@belczaar2 жыл бұрын
I can't believe that the P-47 isn't in this.
@Fatuzci5 жыл бұрын
What about ww2 jets?
@firepower70175 жыл бұрын
@meme man Yet they bothered with adding experimental planes the like of which either never saw service during WW2 or never being completed. Get out of here!
@Flenders19835 жыл бұрын
@meme man There were over 2000 jets build in germany: '1433x' Messerschmitt Me 262 were build. Also '214x' Arado Ar 234, '170x' Heinkel He 162. Quite more, as some Prototypes shown in the video.
@germanlovaiza64685 жыл бұрын
Loved the Mésserschmitt Bf 109.
@nossedestroyer18795 жыл бұрын
Где ил-2?
@RomaNovikov19805 жыл бұрын
Самара; пересечение пр. Кирова - Московское шоссе.
@whittyjd5 жыл бұрын
No surprises you included the show-ponies Lancs & Halifax, but left out the real work horse, the Hampden.
@antondopira59575 жыл бұрын
Where is Pe-2 (TB-7)?
@freeman_01545 жыл бұрын
TB-7 is Pe-8. Pe-2 is a dive bomber.
@anderson.m.kraggs98553 жыл бұрын
he might be doing some unknown bombers that havent been heard of for a while
@marcosechi88205 жыл бұрын
Pe-8? Russiam bias?
@robertmiller2173 Жыл бұрын
Excellent thank you extremely well done, over time how about adding the He 177, the Fw 200, Me 323, Bv 222 to name a few.
@syedrafiqkazim4484 жыл бұрын
anyone else notice how the F4F Wildcat at 1:37 didn't have any vertical stabilisers?
@synthyawylder32973 жыл бұрын
I'm surprised, the P-47 wasn't shown, yet several aircraft that were either experimental &/ never flew during WWII were included.
@gemibay17744 жыл бұрын
my airplane original toy is p-51 mustang that thing is amazing dude make vid everyday
@dan-gheorghe22775 жыл бұрын
No IAR-81, no Stuka, no IL2, no ME262.
@marksolarz37565 жыл бұрын
A Bf 109 is tiny! Next to a B-17,......or a P-47......you couldn’t see them straight on,it’s no wonder the bombers fell in such numbers. Respect and Honor.
@suzukirider90303 жыл бұрын
Huh, always thought the Bf-109 was bigger than the Fw-190, but it's the other way around, and by quite a large margin at that!
@matiasdelafuente31065 жыл бұрын
xD that zoom at the end xD!!!! Nice job :3 What's your "politic" on what planes make it to the list? availability of schematics? personal taste? or what? xD
@VRichardsn5 жыл бұрын
_availability of schematics?_ I am guessing this one? Because there are many missing on the list.
@fizylier84625 жыл бұрын
Were is polish bombers PZL.37 Łoś nad PZL.23 Karaś?
@marionsabandal14194 жыл бұрын
love the jazz music
@ألمحب774 жыл бұрын
Beautiful and elaborate work, but please take into account the date of the release and manufacture of the aircraft must be historically serialized from the oldest to the latest
@sirdamedol25665 жыл бұрын
This is realy good! I shure like it! Shure, you could have added the p-47, that would be nice. Tho its nothing big.
@andreiolanescu46825 жыл бұрын
Like the BV238
@jamesharvey12124 жыл бұрын
What about the me-262?
@aviator00935 жыл бұрын
On every one of this guys videos there is so much criticism, just be nice he's doing his best
@shep75445 жыл бұрын
Comrade Borya What do you think criticism is for?
@aviator00935 жыл бұрын
@@shep7544 Its my job to a comrade blin...plus a lot of the people complaining is just because their favorite vehicle didn't get in. He cant to everything
@shep75445 жыл бұрын
Comrade Borya That’s true, criticism is to make videos or content better in the future but I do agree that people are just yelling because they didn’t get a vehicle in that they like, however I don’t know why the creator put in vehicles that were created after world war 2 or not even saw combat but didn’t put in any jets
@theblackbear2113 жыл бұрын
Let's see, planes that actually flew in combat in WWII: The Polikarpov I-15 and I-16 fighters and the Polikarpov po-2 Bombers. The Gloucester Gladiator Fighter and the Fairey Swordfish Bomber. The Fairey Battle bomber. The Brewster Buffalo fighter, the A-20 Havoc Bomber, the PBY Catalina Bomber. The Douglas SBD- Dauntless Bomber... I can think of several more.
@keithdmaust18545 жыл бұрын
Very professional aircraft images and presentation concept - BUT drop shadow beneath aircraft is way too dark; appears as if planes have double tail plus leading edge of wings obscured by shadow.
@EstonianShark5 жыл бұрын
This isn't a history presentation. Nobody asked for you to analyze it.
@keithdmaust18545 жыл бұрын
Mr Shark - I read the entire comment section before I added my comment - and it's completely full of other people doing analysis. Not sure why mine would be any more or any less valid than everyone else's. Perhaps you can enlighten me. I wasn't giving a historical critique but a graphic one from a designer standpoint.
@EstonianShark5 жыл бұрын
@@keithdmaust1854 I'm not sure what you mean by saying 'all I see is analysis' Most comments are about people wanting more aircraft or my g Pro Man wants a Heinkel 177. And yeah some are, but not to the depths of which you are in, no no, no. We don't need a Harvad level analysis on a video that required 5% effort to make.
@keithdmaust18545 жыл бұрын
@@EstonianShark not sure what you're getting at but no hard feelings hope I didn't offend anybody
@liamflux38755 жыл бұрын
where is the BV238 y'know.. one of the largest aircraft in WWII
@bradschaeffer57363 жыл бұрын
The P47 Thunderbolt? Most produced American fighter plane in history that saw combat in every theater from 1943 to the end of the war??
@smort35475 жыл бұрын
Nice video.
@22steve51504 жыл бұрын
If you are gonna have the XB-35, why not the XB-36? Also, why no B-25 Mitchell, B-26 Marauder, XB-15, B-18 Bolo, B-23 Dragon, A-20 Boston, B-32 Dominator, B-34 Lexington?
@ralphyznaga17612 жыл бұрын
Great video and terrific animation. However, the Flying Wing is a post-WII airplane so it really shouldn't be included on the list. Still, awesome job.
@gabrielsuarez44245 жыл бұрын
You have the wrong FW-190, also there were multiple variations of it as well... the version you have looks more like the TA-152... the original FW-190 had a radial engine not traditional longer oil cooled engine like most WW2 Planes... also there was the FW-190 D which had the longer engine but roughly the same wingspan. This video is not very well done because you are missing some of the most crucial fighters and Bombers... you are missing the ME-262, HE-111, BV-238, some Japanese fighters and bombers... etc, please neither the fix this video by actually doing research, and make this video more detailed and with more quality, or make a new video.
@gabrielsuarez44245 жыл бұрын
@Possumlove no the wing shape and span are off... and the D models were later versions... the more well known version was the A-8... the FW-190 he has here looks exactly like the TA-152 except he puts the wing span longer