You alone are the universe ||

[@Shaoming2]

So good!

[@sathyanna3665]

I Am in the Light. Light is in Me. I am the Light.

[@Rang_Birangi_Jokes]

Sir, is knowing mentally that I am not this body or mind okay? Or I have to see it?

[@NondualityChannel]

Mentally knowing doesn't mean a thing...it's worthless. See it so completely that it is knowing in your bones and being that you are not the body or mind.

[@shinrinyokumusic1808]

​@@NondualityChannelbut how?

[@NondualityChannel]

@@shinrinyokumusic1808 kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y3KTlHaEp5uKrdU

[@Rang_Birangi_Jokes]

Sir, is the main purpose of diminishing the me, to make the awarness and silence more profound?

[@NondualityChannel]

It is to see the false as false.

[@unseekingseeker1359]

In my view, the recognition of Self in singularity, during the time* (*although there is no space or time therein) identity-less presence is in that state of being in active cognition, the dualistic or material universe disappears, unless of course we can bilocate awareness, as Swami Lakshmanjoo had observed, ‘with each breath, the universe appears and disappears’. As for enlightenment, who gets enlightened, when there is no one here, in as a separate person? We may say the disappearance of ego (identity) reveals Self, which always was always was and is but not known to the entity who is not.

[@max_ventura]

I feel that people probably get caught up on the term “Brahman”, particularly those who didn’t learn about the term until they began seeking. It can sound like a foreign, sparkly mystical term - and I imagine is therefore at risk of being idealized - but it really just means “existence”. It’s anything but foreign. Realizing Brahman just means intuitively/ experientially realizing one of the most obvious truths, if not the most obvious truth, that there is: That the most fundamental reality behind everything is existence, or beingness. And put differently - that everything, including our localized conscious awareness and ego, on the most fundamental level, is existence/ energy, and is therefore fundamentally the same. Perhaps it is more that this truth is simple, rather than obvious. It’s obvious to our intellects, but not to our experience. At some point, simplicity and obviousness seem to begin having an inverse relationship with most people. And the truth is so incomprehensibly simple.

[@Rang_Birangi_Jokes]

Sir what is the sound of silence?

[@NondualityChannel]

It can not be said.

[@mikehev222]

You alone are the holy one, you alone are the most high

[@NondualityChannel]

Neither holy nor unholy...neither high nor low.

[@MiguelMartinez-js4qe]

I really don’t understand what its meant by Brahman, it’s causing confusion. Am I Brahman or god the omnipotent creator of the universe or I am Brahman or god the son. Can someone explain ?

[@NondualityChannel]

Brahman alone exists...omnipresent, omnipotent. Creator vs son is a duality that does not exist.

[@MiguelMartinez-js4qe]

But I’m not the supreme being GOD the creator of the universe. I am the god the son. You are implying I am the supreme being all powerful creator. That’s radical and outlandish to imply that I am the creator GOD. I may be one with the creator but I’m not the creator. I don’t think Rupert Spira would imply that I am GOD the creator.

[@NondualityChannel]

@@MiguelMartinez-js4qe You keep implying a strange duality, separation, and otherness. It is very simple...Brahman alone exists and there is no other. The "I" is fake and an illusion.

[@MiguelMartinez-js4qe]

@@NondualityChannel no spiritual teacher would say that I am GOD the creator only you would say that. That’s blasphemy how can you declare your self GOD the creator, that’s insanity. The trinity is true you are not GOD the father. When have you heard Rupert spira say you are the father ? Stop implying that you are GOD.

[@NondualityChannel]

@@MiguelMartinez-js4qe There is no duality, so no trinity or plurality of any kind really exists.

[@ash9x9]

Is Brahman is same as Consciousness ..??

[@NondualityChannel]

Yes.

[@ash9x9]

And Brahman came out of what!? What preceded it@@NondualityChannel

[@NondualityChannel]

@@ash9x9 There is no preceeding as there is no beginning. There is no outside of Brahman, so there is no coming from.

[@ash9x9]

Everything come from something - This is the universal law, Brahman has to come out of something as well - What could be 'that'?@@NondualityChannel

[@NondualityChannel]

@@ash9x9 Only that which has a beginning comes from something and such things have an ending as well. Brahman is not such a thing.

[@peacecraft3449]

I'm not going to lie, I hope this is not true for one reason: reality is going to be as lonely as it gets. If everyone and everything is really just one thing then that means you and I and everyone reading this is the same self, and there is no us. No family, no friends, no loved ones. Just a single consciousness playing pretend with itself sounds very depressing.

[@NondualityChannel]

LOL. This video has been my lived understanding and experience since 2005 and I don't find it lonely or depressing at all.

[@peacecraft3449]

@@NondualityChannel I'm glad you dont but if I am to understand this correctly, you just used the words "i" and "my" to explain to "me" something. If this video states what I think it does: "you and I" are not even talking to different beings right now, it's just one thing speaking with itself pretending there is someone else. Family and friends might as well be viewed as sock puppets, there is no one else in existence. I cant imagine how this could be comforting.

[@NondualityChannel]

@@peacecraft3449 The conventions of speech and pronouns can still be used. I/my/me is not an identity...they just refer to the body-mind. 'I went to the store' just means the body-mind went to the store. Just talking to yourself is a way to think of it...yes, there is no other. The totality...complete...without lack and no possibility for more.

[@peacecraft3449]

@@NondualityChannel well like I said, I'm glad it gives you peace, it's just a nightmare for me

[@NondualityChannel]

@@peacecraft3449 It is always a nightmare scenario for a "me" (i.e. identity)...but there is no "me" and when there is no "me" it is quite comfortable.