Your Rights in 20 seconds

[@soliel8999]

This lady is amazing. She's so gentle and soft-spoken, but she's really a fierce warrior.

[@moiragoldsmith7052]

Yes! Her mild manner is very deceptive...I wish her well in her Court case.

[@misscameroon8062]

@@moiragoldsmith7052 what is her court case?

[@roydavis5613]

@@misscameroon8062 Speeding.

[@andypandy-qz5om]

​@ScienceEvolvesOneFuneralAtaTime Firstly, that is an appeal to authority, which is a logical fallacy. Secondly, she said she went to law school

[@rosslomath]

​@@scienceevolves4417 anyone can read and learn?

[@robertdiamond2830]

i love this woman - wish there was thousands like her - what a hero. 👏👏👏

[@SimplyInHim]

WE need to be like her.

[@cavendish009]

We, in England, have always talked about OUR COMMON LAW but do not know what it really is.

[@carlstewart8787]

@@scienceevolves4417 Courts are Admiiralty/Maritime Law.

[@billymoffat4744]

@@scienceevolves4417 oh oh Troll Alert

[@ShemuĕlVick]

No one alive has ever experienced such a thing.

[@iriswalzak615]

And in Australia, same same.

[@iriswalzak615]

​@@scienceevolves4417😅you're so funny - .. duhhhh😂

[@MVT55]

This is amazing , we must remind the government of their place in society.

[@rickjensen2717]

They are elected to serve us, not the other way around!

[@roydavis5613]

MVT55 The peasants attempted it in 1381 ..........

[@Cris.d.em71]

Too little to late I’m afraid..😞

[@oldwhinger2746]

..in the tower maybe...

[@sharonbrown4506]

MTV55 - Constantly, it seems!

[@boroughgal4146]

Education about the English Constitution/common law was once known as civics in our schools and was removed from the curriculum, including law schools and the Bar Council, back in the 70’s…all by design. Hence why many people, including the legal profession, do not understand the law of the land. Richard you need to have a chat with Graham Moore, leader of the English Constitution Party. He will explain why he considers “the Constitution is the Solution”.

[@loveistheantedote1811]

Also Grammar and Latin was removed as anyone proficient, would recognise the frauds via the language.

[@royalalloy3471]

If you don't know what your rights are you can never know your responsibilities.

[@boroughgal4146]

@@royalalloy3471 agreed and that may be part of the plan 🤔 The solicitor and constitutionalist featured in this video may be of interest. kzbin.info/www/bejne/mZvXaWmnmdlrr68

[@boroughgal4146]

@@loveistheantedote1811 quite likely. I didn’t study Latin myself, but my brother did.

[@kalaspera12]

Dont want him on here.

[@jesusisking3974]

Common Law = Commonsense, Integrity, Compassion, Kindness, Understanding, Fairness, Balance and True Justice.

[@rahuwa]

Richard is a breath of fresh air. Very interesting guests discussing important topics. Always a gent without interrupting his guests. I wish there were more people like Richard.

[@ClaireGarrard]

Richard is ace. I love his channel, because it's always so interesting and he has a sense of humour.

[@ClaireGarrard]

​@@scienceevolves4417 What is a noob? 🤔

[@UniversalVibesTV]

I concur 100 percent

[@ClaireGarrard]

@@scienceevolves4417 Thank you. And yes 😆

[@janmariablackwell8138]

I could listen to Richard for hours. He's a real gentleman when it comes to interviewing and he always asks very relevant questions. I only started watching/listening to him recently and I'm well and truly hooked!

[@MsScotlyn]

You are so right Richard, this whole 'scam' of the last 3 years has been a huge awakening. I always questioned but I have learned more in the past 3 years than I have in my whole life, which has left me more empowered and stronger. I have been putting these 'scam' corporations on notice and stopped paying. Thank you so much for standing up for humanity x

[@JK-hf2cx]

What have you stopped paying, if you don’t mind me asking? My local council has behaved fraudulently and is now bankrupt, as a result of which, our council tax has increased by 15% this year. I really begrudge paying it, as we get so little in return, and am thinking of withholding it, especially as they’ve just inexplicably chopped down the gorgeous cherry trees on my street. We, the residents, loved them and they took years to grow.

[@lizziel4876]

@@JK-hf2cx I'd love to know this too.

[@PaulH-hl5hw]

I need to get a book on common law..I have been meaning to for a couple of years..this has to be the law of the land. Otherwise laws are at the whim of every petty tyrant who decides to act on his thoughts..

[@PaulH-hl5hw]

@@carlstewart8787 👍thanks..not heard of it

[@flyhi2773]

There are books about it but you could also do with Blacks Law dictionary and its a challenge to know the legal definition of literally every word going. Why they use the word PERSON because as a living 'person' you think theyre asking you if youre the living person Paul H. Nope. In writing your name is probably written in black ink probably in BLOCK CAPITAL LETTERS because black ink and capitals are for the dead and you can be a dead person. One day will be. Its a trick they use to get you to say youre a corpse orator. A corporation. A dead body or person that talks and you just said you are. Worse the state polices the state and increasingly they wont enforce the law against themselves. Basically its a criminal state. The Nazis did this too. Totally disregarded the law of the land.

[@chriscaine7689]

​@Salty Shaman a great quote from Abraham Lincoln - "Be sure you put your feet in the right place, then stand firm." That statement couldn't be more true.

[@oldwhinger2746]

Common law as such has been sodded about with, it's far better, as has been said by other guests too, is natural law.

[@johnbennett7065]

,Sir William Blackstone's Lord Chief Justice. "Commentaries on the Laws of England" 1721. Plus " The New Despotism" by Lord Chief Justice Lord Norman Hewart 1925

[@alfrednewman292]

Something I would like to mention for this lovely lady with such a great spirit. What works very well is to never get to the statutes by challenging jurisdiction of your person. As she stated, there is no contract and you're not a slave then by what right do they claim your person. The normal response it that you have a driver license. But a driver is an actor in commerce, so if you were not in commerce at the time that contract does not apply. Also, jurisdiction must be the first part of a charging document. Now in the US, traffic court is an administrative court, not a judicial court. It is much easier to challenge. There is also the challenge before asking to prove jurisdiction to inquire if this is a criminal or civil matter. That is a question they cannot answer for if they do you have them either way. In a criminal matter there needs to be a corpus delicti, literally from Latin, where is the body. Body refers to a harmed human as fictional entities cannot be harmed. If no body, move for dismissal on the grounds there is no crime for which relief can be granted. If a civil matter, then demand an original copy of the contract, how that contract was breached and the damages that are claimed.

[@radtheinspiration]

Perfectly stated

[@donaldkenney2648]

I love it,,if you're not doing wrong you are doing Right 🙌

[@ME-fo7si]

But what is wrong or right? What if it’s different for different groups, then how do you police that. Where is the “ law” for different perspectives on a moral landscape.

[@MissDelia]

My dad is a retired PC in the MET, now in his late 70's. I showed him the CV Act 2020 and asked him if it was right that people were arrested for being in the park. He said "no, because they are guidelines". So he was trained in common law when he was in the police, but these days they are obviously not.

[@normanpearson8753]

Guidelines would be useless .I think he's wrong .

[@EnglishLaw]

Common or Constitutional Law hasn't been taught since the 60s, so anyone in the know will be getting on a bit, and certainly retired. The law that protects the English was not removed, only hidden.

[@jeanporter5092]

We need a common law party

[@Berry-fr5wj]

Bankers wouldn't allow it , it would be called far right, straight away

[@sobeit1927]

@@Berry-fr5wj ignore the bankers and their opinions

[@carlstewart8787]

@@Berry-fr5wj Bankers won't be needed after the banks crash, then we go to the Quantum Financial System.

[@stevestratton2622]

There is already one in existence unfortunately YT are censoring my comment

[@stevestratton2622]

Jean search Daddy Dragon

[@derickjude7188]

Always have lived by this. Respect has to be what we live by, and we should NEVER do or accept what we know is petty, ridiculous and plain wrong.

[@user-zz9gn2dc3l]

Yes agree.

[@oldwhinger2746]

..and illegal or more correctly 'against the law'

[@JohnTruelove-me2jm]

Great conversation, respect , JT ❤

[@AllegedlyDave]

This process is the process of becoming an adult in a system that keeps us as children.

[@jfilm7466]

Check out the age of majority

[@bertibear1300]

She said if you let small things go it can escalate into war..How very true and profound that statement is.That is exactly what has happened.

[@peteclegg1578]

Same with crime. See NY Mayor Rudi Giulliani and his "broken window" policing policy.

[@helensregor]

Dr Jordan B Peterson teaches doing this in relatiinships can lead to disaster.

[@springtime8029]

We have to stand up as individuals now with proper guidence and come out of our ignorance starting with the king's coronation!

[@sarah-jaynemackay2740]

@@scienceevolves4417 nor mine

[@julieheudebourck]

What I found over the last few years is that the Government signed away the rights of the people who where vaccine damaged where they get no compensation from said drug company’s that is criminal in my eyes and they should be held to account

[@boroughgal4146]

@@scienceevolves4417mine neither!

[@samrowbotham8914]

Before James I people could challenge the King now the real Subjects of this kingdom are no longer to get anywhere near them. The coronation oath is a contract between the Monarch and the people. This is all explained by barrister LL Blake in his book The Royal Law.

[@PeteAxeShields]

The irony, about the fine for travelling a tad above the national speed limit, is THEY are fining US for using OUR roads, paid for by OUR Vehicle TAX / Council TAX / Fuel TAX. Yep, the whole world is a stage .... and it is full of terrible actors. Lovely chat, Richard, with a lovely lady who is doing a great service for humanity. God bless you Ruth 🙏

[@normanpearson8753]

They...are fining you for going too fast and endangering others .It dissuades others , and you for doing it again Warnings don't often work . Seems fair to me.

[@stevestratton2622]

Well done Mr Vobes You hosted a superb guest and offered superb information a rare thing in our lives

[@johntimbrell]

@Steve Stratton So Richard , why do you ignore what this lady states? You will not help people to use what this lady explains. WHY? You are going to ba a chairman of a group meeting in April spending three days discussing freedoms. You have yet to explain to your 100,000 + followers the very easy way to use our common law. WHY? WHY? This is what you should be promoting the very easy way to push back the corrupt state. It's not just me. Check out the two Stroud psychologists who were arrested for offending against the lockdown laws. They used the law that this lady explains. They knew that the common law proved that the lockdown laws were against common law. I advise people who have offended parliament law which is against our common law to not argue with the police. When they are charged or summonsed to serve a notice by email on the Crown Prosecution Service by emai containg these facts. "NOTICE. I am your name and address. At time date and place I am accused of offending against act and section. My action is allowed for at common law. I require you to cease and desist causing me harm. Signed and served electronically according to the civil procedure rules. Your name" That's it Richard. Have you the guts to use this in your upcoming expensive conference.

[@khawksey5466]

My heart feels lighter while listening to Ruth, thank you both.

[@we-can-do]

But common law interfaces through a contrived legal system that serves to overwhelm any individual attempting to assert their intrinsic, simple, rights.

[@chris-eq3sx]

And if the laws are changed to make ones rights illegal, where do people stand then?

[@ohnoitisnt]

@@scienceevolves4417 What cement do you refer to exactly? Be right.

[@samrowbotham8914]

Two reasons for this the Judiciary don't know our English Constitution and they are allowing statute law to trump our Common Law.

[@user-zz9gn2dc3l]

Then it is up to us to educate ourselves to not let them overwhelm us with their legalise.

[@we-can-do]

@@user-zz9gn2dc3l Preferably en masse.

[@Dylstardelux]

What an awesome lady. She has found her calling and that's why all her nerves and fear have disappeared. Inspirational!

[@Nickle314]

You are not responsible if you have no right of consent.

[@Nickle314]

Let me explain. If a woman is raped, she has not had that right of consent. What Ruth is saying ah, if she protested, then its simple and it would be better. I think that Ruth's argument is wrong. So for another example. The government's pension ponzi. Here politicians want you to think its pensioners who are rich who are to blame. They have weatlh [because they have saved] and wealth is all unearned, so its them. Turns out if you do the analysis, pensioners have been ripped off. Mr Average over a life time is down over £2 million because his wealth was taken. If you earn more than average its even more. So they then blame the workers for not paying the tax with no services. At no point does anyone have any consent, and at no point have they been informed. As such they are simply not responsible. It's politicians. Politicians however want a scapegoat. Anyone but them. Hence there needs to be a basic right. The right of informed explicit consent.

[@anneofgreengables1619]

You are responsible if you do harm to another living man or woman.

[@Nickle314]

@@anneofgreengables1619 Unless you are a politician. Think about consent. Does that other person consent to the harm? If not, I agree. If they do, well is it informed consent? Is it explicit consent? For example, can a person who is mentally ill give informed consent? My view is no. Consent covers the question of harm to others. The usual left wing argument is consent means you can commit murder by not consenting to be covered by the laws on murder. However they ignore the question of the victims consent. The reason is they dont' believe others have the right of consent and their entire political world view is based on no consent for others.

[@Nickle314]

@Deborah Casey There's something to be said for all government spending to be published to the penny, with the names and addresses of the receiptiants, including companies etc. You could argue the same is true for taxes. ie. £3,000 for NHS insurance. £2,500 for common goods £8,000 per year for your kids schooling. ... That way people can find out how much welfare claimants are getting, and paying. Of course that would lead to cuts to welfare. Like no welfare

[@davidmwood560]

You always have consent, even if you don't know about it. You have to withdraw consent

[@Indigenous51]

I’m in full admiration of this lady and her courage to contest the corrupt and mercenary system to glean money for any misdemeanour . This is just a system to fill the treasury for the government to squander without our consent!

[@annapachaclarke2392]

Exactly, you are correct!

[@patbuckley4039]

Springs to mind that our government have not adhered to the 'cause no harm, no loss' in the last 3 years. Maybe they are exempt........

[@ZooScott]

Skulduggery 🆘💥👣…

[@steverooke1717]

There exempt because there not our legitimate government,it's all a scam🇬🇧👍

[@garyburchgb]

What it needs is for individuals who have been inconvenienced by certain recent events and can prove so to charge Boris Johnson, the prime minister at the time, £500.00 per hour regarding compensation under harms caused due to a lack of diligence or some such like.

[@carlstewart8787]

Not.

[@patbuckley4039]

@@garyburchgb 👍

[@Pamela-zo9sl]

This woman is such an asset to anyone trying to find out how to protest the wrongs that we face every day.

[@JuliaHartley]

I really enjoyed this one, well done both! 💜

[@lizziel4876]

Did he slip you a fiver to say that?!!

[@tripsnap8948]

This is a great interview. I feel so much more empowered learning more about this. We have so many rights. Don’t let anyone take them from you.

[@lifesonsrv9702]

They can't take them away. Through our ignorance, we give them away.

[@Cris.d.em71]

@@lifesonsrv9702 correct unfortunately.

[@andreweadon-dale6613]

All I can say is brilliant, excellent, enlightenment,simple. Thank you so much for coming on the show 🙂❤️

[@derekc6445]

I was once put in a cell for 9 hours, I didn't do anything wrong, I was civil, and I was sober as well. I did have a disagreement with a police officer and he didn't like my attitude, no rules or laws were broken. But power corrupts.

[@Red-ns9ny]

I love your videos Richard ❤ you wonderful soul 😊

[@1949ers]

A great guest once again. If everyone everywhere had an equal piece of the pie what a wonderful world this could be.

[@barryphillips6845]

Are you a Trotskyite?

[@acw7120]

There is only two groups of people; those who follow "Mr Worldly Wiseman" and those that take the narrow gate and do not. The first group have ended up with "Air Pie without the Crust".

[@joefization]

Brilliant discussion! Thank you both! Here's some etymology on the word 'person'- directly from Latin persona "human being, person, personage; a part in a drama, assumed character," originally "a mask, a false face," such as those of wood or clay, covering the whole head, worn by the actors in later Roman theater.

[@Sam-sz8fz]

Non sense equals no sense . Legal person - fictional...statues and acts leg As opposed to a natural law a living man, lawful

[@acw7120]

@@scienceevolves4417 More than "roughly" knowing is the problem. This is describing a PERSONA - a Human Being but a Human Being WHOM? Which character in the "Roman Theatre"?

[@normanpearson8753]

A person is a human being .Courts use language of the man in the street .

[@Sam-sz8fz]

@@normanpearson8753 a legal person is a fiction created "from" the birth certificate (record of live birth) to do commerce with you as a sentient living man or woman. Beware there are actors on here friends of BBB to put you off the scent! It's all a game to them, as they make a living out of the legal person fiction scam. The esoteric knowledge is now being highlighted to the general population the people hold the power. People just need to be educated and the bad actors court presumptions, (Search the 12 court presumptions) used in the private for profit, bar guild association rules operated in commercial courts, magiatrates etc , non courts reord private bar guild matters in a supposedly public court, come on read the scam going on. the system BBB is involved in desperately needa exposing to address whats really happening, inside the legal system and the massive scam being perpetrated on a massive scale , which to highlight is the "legal person fictional estate administration" of the lwgal estate accounting and to establish (vying) for the Executor / beneficial title which once you claim your inalienable natural born rights to he FREE and tell the court actors firmly you have standing, correct the position declare yourself as true Executor, take command of the legal trust accounting and take up your fiduciary executor responsibility, at the age of majority to administer the legal person estate and confirm for the clerk of guardians/judge and prosecutors including barristers/solicitors jusges etc acting as public financial legal accounting interlopers and highlighting the error and that the court hearing is a private Bar Guild Hearing NOT a "public court of record", thus a sham and on declaration collapse the legal person hearing preferably by declaring "standing" and rebuttal the 12 court presumptions (if the legal person estate received a summons) in the particular hearing. The only purpose the magistrates and any defacto commercial hearing where a single judge, or 3 magiatrates butcher, Baker candlestick maker sit in judgement of another man or woman sit to gain "Jurisdiction" to hear the complaint, (subject matter,) tocwhich jurisdiction over the parties is vital. No jurisdiction no hearing.. the legal persona is the dead fictional party thatsc complaint is highlighted on a summons, all caps, (capitis diminution maxima).servitude made out against the fictional legal person , not you.the private non public court of record, a private hearing held in the public magistrates court room, a total contradiction like the legal actors private bar guild oath and their public oath, allc a scam and the court hearing a conplete nullity. In a desperate bid to joinder you to agree to be both a living man or woman and a commercial entity, the legal fiction persona" so you agree to their "presumptions" to be trustee of the complaint before the private court, which regrettably we see people agree to, through complete lack of legal knowledge people sadly do agree to being scammed. For those that sleep on their inalienable rights there is no help for the widows son. It's all a scam that's why BBB will not debate the issue with me, as hes exposed and to write any further defacto pseudo legal nonsense like BBB claims that statutes are LAW and this claim lawful when statutes are NOT, statutes and acts creates for a privately operated, for profit crown corporation uk masquerading as a benevolent caring public corporation government, when in truth, the courts police etc are the scammers and do the dirty work against the people they are themselves one of the people of the uk and thus do harm every day using legal nonsense which acts of parliament are only given the "force of law " by the majority of the general population aquiencing , the people being hoodwinked by the legal actors (some unaware, most .gov state actors solicitors / judges, clerk of guardians in councils/courts are mostly aware etc ) and unknowingly the people go along with the legal deception. It's a defacto judicial mess and needs an overhaul as it's about to collapse when the truth and lies are now being highlighted on a massive scale and people are now awakening and thus highlighted to becoming aware of the "administration" that is perpetrated using deception by use of you legal fictional person estates, operated under trust law and the state actors are in total dishonour as in first level courts in the UK and beyond which are commercial, salvage admiralty law and eccastical courts laws of Ba'al, all abuse, operated in the defacto private, not public courts in a bid to deceive and seek peoples hard earned labours (earnings) to swell the coffers of the judicial system that offers only a "control mechanism" based on hidden undisclosed commercial person contracts.anymore nonsense from BBB friends and I will expose more shocking facts and explain how we got here and how the settlement acts, today's passport still affords you to be chattel and like the "P" wornnon the arms of paupers, just like the letter "P"in your passport (type P stated on the main page) confirms your status until you declare your lawful inalienable standing and grasp the Executor controlling position and correct t the error and stay in honour exposing the court racket, and confirming the unlawful operating in commercial roles by the public trustees ( barristers and solicitors, judges indeed any public servant who (Presume) you to be the trustee and they the executor until you correct them. The correction can and shall be made via the return of a summons de declaring your executor standing . Lets all expose the scam if you need to learn more seek to watch richard vobes on rumble to get up to speed as more to he exposed. ..

[@chrismartenable]

What a lovely brave Lady. I've been to court twice over parking & speeding fines & lost, but I have now discovered that legalese is parse Syntax. Once you have learnt it you can use it against them. We are dealing with unbridled evil. The reason a judge wears a black robe is because he's witness to our death, because he knows the minute we walk into that room we have lost, because we don't understand syntax & therefore we are going to loose.

[@markrainford1219]

Let me know when you win a case.

[@AlphaBeta-vq6ks]

RIP. You’re dead as soon as you play their game.

[@suziqw139]

Learning our rights to live peaceably and stand up for yourself with grace and courage ....what a goal to live by and teach our children.

[@suziqw139]

@@scienceevolves4417 BLESSED are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of God. 😊😊😊

[@derickjude7188]

​@@scienceevolves4417You should be back in your basement chappie with your dummy, to calm you down. There, there now.

[@susanwiltshire1458]

What a lovely lady, thank you Richard for a amazing talk, this has given me hope, I have questioned written and been to me my meeting over fifteen years. I knew I was right and I believed in myself, and lost promotion, my piece of mind was more important than money. But in the NHS once you bring up what's going on, it's the end for you. Kept all my response from CEO down, with out any out come. It all about money and fear.

[@rogergusty1722]

Awesome .... the 'Clamp' story. Well done Richard and well done to this awesome lady. Brilliant ... please get her back.

[@Endorfen2011]

Once you see the rabbit coming out the trap door, the magic trick doesn't work anymore. No victim = No crime. Great show! Thank you.

[@fionawestbury1148]

This whole episode in History has enabled us to open our eyes at last! Great speaker and so inspiring!

[@valkiely5787]

I wish I were like her, so cool calm and collective. We need many more like this knowledgeable lady. Well done to her for standing up to this corrupt system!

[@001rice]

I love this topic, I've been very interested in Common Law for years, it is extremely important we get more involved with the Law and educate others, the time is ripe as men and women are starting to question the current system, they know something is very wrong. Thanks so much for having your guest Ruth on, hope to hear from her again :)

[@boroughgal4146]

If inclined, check out the English Constitution Party. Can’t include a link as YT will remove it. That’s how much of a threat it appears to be.

[@swampygirl7811]

Rumble The Full English 8pm weeknights.

[@ClaireGarrard]

What a fantastic lady Ruth is. She's not phased by having to face the courtroom and she knows she is right. So brave. I wish I could be like that.

[@stephaniecorbett5356]

Another excellent video, packed full of vital information. I do hope lots and lots of people share this. Thank you Richard and your very inspiring guest.

[@RightWing1]

This video is absolutely priceless and should be a wake up call to us all that we have far more power over situations that are being used to oppress everyone's lives. I am going to watch this video again to get a better understanding of our rights and will certainly be sharing this wonderful lady's advice. The contract aspects of law open up some very interesting points about the way the system just hands us bills and expects us to all cough up, no questions asked.

[@juliedixon1429]

Fantastic interview.. thank you both. I feel very empowered now 😊

[@lindahockham5081]

Everything we have been told, taught, and participated in has been fraudulent. What a relief. I have felt imposed upon by this experience by consenting to the nonsense. This knowledge must be emblazoned on our soul so we never feel comfortable unless we are honouring ourselves. Fair and reciprocal in all our dealings that we do no harm. Beautiful. ❤️🇨🇦

[@kikkan7110]

Good on you Mrs. Skolmli, for letting the nerves disappear out the backdoor! We should all do that. (At least from time to time) Thank you so much both, for this enjoyus video, well done!

[@tessakhalil6686]

Oh my goodness I do love to read the comments on your podcasts and usually they are positive and uplifting but this subject really does stir things up going by the comments of one or two people. It really is clear to me that we need a little bit more education on the subject and I’m so grateful for your guest today Richard as her lovely gentle manner has made it sound manageable. Thank you

[@jugbywellington1134]

Excellent comments. Mrs Skolmli is a formidable woman, despite her gentle manner. I live with several dogs at home, and the top dog is very gentle and never needs to fight. I feel very ignorant after listening to this presentation, and I realise we all need to know this stuff. Fractional reserve banking, which I do know about, is another thing everybody should be aware of. I seem to tbe the only person I know who actually takes time to read books and wants to know things. A bit depressing, eh?

[@karenmccarthy5841]

Wonderful information. Ruth you are a real warrior. Thank you.

[@berylarmitage6930]

RIP sweet lady. You will be missed in the fight against evil.

[@groovethief711]

Love this one. I will be preaching these princibles to anyone wanting to listen. I work im a big supermarket amd talk to EVERYONE! keep up the amazing work Richard.

[@margeryfranko1850]

Thank you Richard for introducing Ruth to us. Thank you Ruth. I really appreciate how you explained everything in a very calm and easy manner. Another great video Richard

[@macaw6718]

hi and many thanks to both richard and ruth. a truly enlightening and educational conversation. kind regards.

[@mgtowpia7298]

When in court and they ask for your plea (guilty or not), explain that you cannot enter a plea until you know the jurisdiction of the court. They will try to avoid giving this information as they know they deal with contract law, if no contract exists, the court has no jurisdiction.

[@j33prang]

your so right Richard about the focus covid gave us, in fact i question most things in life now. Even documentaries i once followed i cannot bring myself to watch now. Even a word like "climate change" can cause me to switch off a program i may be watching.

[@jujemcgregor1734]

Continuing gratitude to you and all your guests Richard ❤

[@sjw4302]

Another great interview Richard, thank you to you and to Ruth. Very enlightening.

[@manoftheworld1000]

Thank you so much, Richard, for another great interview! And as I see it the beauty of the concept of our natural rights is it will help put a stop to the rising confusion in people. Take the EU, in the last few years there have been literally thousands of new regulations! The result is we have hardly any rights left, our life today is filled with all kinds of "wrongs"! In a "lean" system of rights people will again be confident as to how to act in the public realm, after all deep inside we know what's right! It's high time _We the People_ took over asap!

[@boroughgal4146]

It’s my understanding that the English Constitution Party, whose manifesto is the Constitution/Bill of Rights 1688, proposes to null and void many treaties, agreements including those made with the EU, as it argues and can prove the agreement is unlawful under the Constitution.

[@vumba1331]

It's actually a 'lien' system, subtle but very important difference to the meaning from the spelling.

[@andreweadon-dale6613]

I have a son around that age and he thinks the same as your son! Thanks to schools and uni !!!

[@debbiecavell4723]

Brilliant show ..Thankyou Richard Thankyou Ruth 🙏🏼

[@johnszczudlik2306]

Another brilliant interview to back up the one with David Adelman. Thanks Richard. All true by the way!

[@vc4154]

Ruth Skolmll, thank you for helping humanity, for giving hope back to our lives, thank you for making me laugh when trying to get Richard to be the tech wiz and share his screen. Keep strong we are with you in spirit when you get to the court. Richard you are always the star.

[@AdianGess]

Brilliant stuff thanks thanks Ruth and Richard. This was brilliant

[@mrmash3085]

The unlawful legistration system needs eradicating from our minds and our lifes. The day unknowingly to your parents that they sign your birth certificate in CAPITAL LETTERS... is the day we are put into this corrupt unlawful legistration . Omitting ourselves from this system is a must , cause common law matters and truth matters with it. Great video once again , straight to the point And a powerful video with it to.

[@flyhi2773]

Know of any really good sites books resources for using this common law successfully? Because I am seriously fed up. The truth is I am British but was brought up abroad mostly and to be responsible. No crimes, no accidents involving pedaestrians or other cars yet in this country I feel as though Im the bad guy so Im like stuff em. Only I have yet to learn how to. They strike me as obsessed with money in this country and its just become a criminal state of extortionists busy mutilating people in the name of ideological nonsense I want out. If you do Thanks.

[@mrmash3085]

@@flyhi2773 The peoples lawyer uk on you tube are very good for the record.

[@jesusisking3974]

The first principle of Common Law is, "Cause no Harm or Loss to Another." Common Law is guided by a Moral Compass ....do unto other's as you would have done to yourself.

[@neiljarvis8911]

Thanks Richard, another enlighteng interview with a very knowledgeable and intelligent guest. Keep them rolling, you could be playing a part in the future history of this country.

[@MrJonblundmusic]

You rock Ruth!!! The court will go great. No you have no reason to be scared of public speaking. In front of theese people as well. You are awesome. Thanks again for everything. You are great.

[@cowesmoooovers7172]

Absolutely superb! A logical and realistic explanation that we can all understand. There are far too many antagonist portrayals of common law on the net - this cuts through that with common sense.

[@Shelly.83]

What a fantastic interview... Very enlightening!!

[@paulamatsikidze3044]

Thanks for your knowledge & inspiring courage, Ruth. Thanks also to you Richard, you always bring us such important information.

[@bathsheba.b8656]

Thank you Richard, I just love the interviews you do and all your hard work on our behalf. Another excellent guest in Ruth, thank you again.

[@PacheMaria]

So so wonderful to see you tackling this very powerful new way of looking at how to unshakle from the tyrannical Admirality Law of the Sea and applying the Law of the Land once more as it was intende given to us by the creator. I have been EMANCIPATED away from these tyrannts since 2008 when NOBODY wanted to know about what I was doing then thinking I was an utter nutcase. However today we have a very strong COMMON LAW movement going in South Africa. Ordinary wo/man are learning WHO they are and how to become totally sovereign again.🎉❤ I salute you for doing these videos and educating the public as to how to deal with any and all CORPORATIONS. ❤

[@millicentfullwood2733]

Thank you Richard and Ruth your guest is really empowering!🙏❤️

[@intergalactic-banana-]

That smile at the end, when speaking about the top tear prisoners, was very knowing. A great number of those individuals know very well that it is a clown town structure but do it anyway. Brilliant lady and another very illuminating conversation. Thank you both. ❤

[@angusmacmillan5365]

Another great interview! Ruth is absolutely right. We all need to do our bit to rid ourselves of the tyranny of government.

[@lindajames7759]

Richard thanks for putting out these amazing videos. My husband was given notification of speeding and his options were 3 points on his license or, he could attend a course to rectify his attitude and still be fined £100 for the privilege. I could not believe that we are in this situation.

[@123weedave]

Have a look at the letter, I imagine it alleges an 'offense'? This means his contractual consent is being solicited because it is outwith common law criteria of crime. A letter of conditional acceptance will stalemate the process..

[@michalwalenciak2478]

It's manageable. Yes Yes Yes 🎉🎉🎉 Thank You 🥰 It's so good to listen to this conversation 😊 Empowering indeed 👍

[@iammeats6743]

This girl has got bigger balls than most men I come across nowadays. Good effort girl. 🙌🙌

[@stephen5852]

Not sure why a reference to "men" is necessary 🙄

[@OneEpicEric]

A degrading comment about men and women

[@angelameans8647]

Thank you both 🙏🏻 You two are now my favourites 🤗 (along with Mark Devlin and Lorri Ladd) 💚

[@stephentarry4475]

Great chat. I'm unshackled..... what a women. Ruth, thank you 🤔🤔

[@kayjackson3888]

We are pawns in the game. I hope this comes back to get the so called elites

[@danielasby9372]

and it is a game, Shakespeare sait it best ' all the worlds a stage'.

[@hmq9052]

The elites are the elites for good reason though. Their ancestors were cleverer than yours

[@kayjackson3888]

@HMQ the 1% will never compete with me or my family, we have morals, they don't.

[@hmq9052]

@@kayjackson3888 That's fine. But objectively they have more stuff, more land, more power, more influence and more cache. As you say you are pawns. Which doesn't sound all that great to me.

[@vc4154]

@@hmq9052 Greedier, more corrupt, non compassionate and Evil, not necessarily cleverer.

[@annteak2669]

What a wonderful interview! Thank you Richard! and Thank you Ruth! x

[@nygus3835]

Simplicity is the feature of a great mind. Thanks for sharing your knowledge in this annoying reality

[@ohnoitisnt]

Ruth - how long until more part 3 videos? Your website is exactly what everyone needs to know. I imagine this is what i would have been taught if civics was still around in the 2000's

[@kbrowney]

Wow great information, saving this :)

[@johnoakley6362]

What an altogether charming, humorous, brave, and pioneering Lady your guest is, this lady is very interesting and easy to listen to, I really enjoyed this very educational video Richard, thank you.

[@rikholmes806]

Brilliant and thanks for mentioning other sites to check out, knowledge is power

[@brucemurray1517]

Wonderful and very empowering. Needs to be shared as widely as possible.

[@southallgreen5584]

Great stuff, Jesus is proud of them I am sure. They are both in Peace and love when discussing these matters. Which is how it should be in christ. God has blessed them both. We should keep them in prayer . As the Sirpents don't like it.

[@andreahodson7031]

I did the training with Ruth a couple of years ago in Parbold! Great course, thanks Ruth ❤💪❤️

[@Sarah-ck4zu]

Great interview and she's right too that Richard is doing a great job with his channel because of his personality and reasoned way of talking through things. He questions and thinks through things in the way many of us do and its helpful to hear especially if you've been alone at home processing things by yourself. Thank you Richard

[@janstafford1490]

What a beautifully calm and reassuring delivery Ruth, nice one Richard👍🏽

[@qbarnes1893]

Whilst I respect and understand the issues discussed, may I offer my opinion? Just because I can question and take a stance against ‘the law’ it doesn’t imply that I should. The recent implosion of auditing people seek to do just that, confrontation and self gratification seems to be their end. That said, we all have the right to be heard by our peers if we have been accused of an infraction and not just sentenced ad hoc. Keep up the great work Richard, your an amazing human being

[@lyndajordan6479]

Thank you Richard and Ruth for this very interesting podcast. Many blessings and much ❤ .

[@dropsika438]

Truly AMAZING!!! Thank you Richard & Ruth!

[@QuePasaUSA]

This was awesome! Dr. Dolores Cahill also talks about this in her seminars.

[@musamusashi]

This is some deep stuff that challenges a lifetime of indoctrination. Thanks a lot for this enlightening conversation.

[@sharonmccormack8026]

Great interview thank you. Genuine, gentle and standing in her power.

[@carolarmer1204]

If birth certificates are our contract with the state , could we argue that as a new born enfant I never conceded to my parents signing me up to this corrupt system thus making the contract void .

[@trappedinroom1014]

Yes! It was your parents who ‘informed’ on you….all documents that came from that can be rebutted by the following: It was not my deed! You was not a party to the creation of any of them, you simply ‘assumed’ the family name and surname were yours, but they’re not. If you want to understand the way you’ve been trapped by an assumed ‘armorial’ name (bearing arms) the best channel is ChristianRemedyInLaw. Even if you’re not religious…just park the spiritual side and listen to him break down how they’ve gained control. They have zero rights over your given name….thats why when the parasites invaded in the Magna Carta days one of their first actions was getting people to choose surnames. It is only the surname ADDED TO your name that they have jurisdiction over. Try writing using just your given name and be amazed, lol! It makes a huge difference. 🙂💕👍🏻

[@OneEpicEric]

​@@trappedinroom1014I just checked out the Christian law channel and was watching the video about Surnames and something popped into my head. The word Surname is a spin on the words Sir name. Sir stands for Slave I Remain therefore your Surname is your Slave name. So do you stop using your sir name.

[@Mark-q7i1m]

​@@OneEpicEric- surname = surcharge name

[@rogergusty1722]

What a lovely lady. Richard, please get her back again .... please!