I guess you could say that tank was fire 🔥

The American not calling it m1 because of another m1 is crazy when you think thay had the M3 lee/grant M3 Stuart

Hay, you brought 'er, YOU dicker Max!

War Thunder ahh paintjob

I like Chaffie. Had to be careful using this in combat. Need support.

T-95 is the T-28 bace with the extra armor on it

Could someone explain to me where the audio is from, please? (If it's from anything, that is)

Well the Bolo had to start somewhere

I VISITED THE TONK A FEW MONTHS AGO!!!

4:00 Re position of entrance hatch, inclusion of the front hull hatch has to be compared to what exactly? The A7 tank of 1938 had a hatch on the front hull, so both V/A and ROF were producing designs throughout the interwar period with front hatches, many other designs had front hatches -prime example FT R-35 H-39, M3 and Ram had a front entrance hatch for the driver, (oh you thought it was a big @rsed vision slit did you? As to any position for escape and egress, only in the 1980s with the design of the Merkeva did anyone really consider crew evac. All other tanks, egress was by hatches often vulnerable to enemy fire, most hatches open from above, and even in the late 1930s the various infantry boards regarded over the top of the body from M2 style Half tracks an unacceptable vulnerability, hence M3, M5, SdKfz 250 and 251 all had rear exits, so why not tanks? because of size and position of motor. So egress from hull roof hatches or turret roof hatches especially exposes crews to small arms and mortar fire, similarly side doors in the Churchill -soon removed from Ram tanks and abandoned on Shermans before production were very vulnerable. German A/T tended to engage Churchills from the side, The only relatively safe emergency escape from a tank was via the hull floor escape and that is qualified by do you want to be crawling underneath a tank spewing burning gasoline?

Gaijin when Cone mentioned the engine: *Cranks headphone volume to 0* Let's add it to the game!!

Sturmtiger:😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Funny thing is that William Sherman said the famous words "War is hell". Making it a bit ironic that the M4 a machine designed to fight in a war is named after him.

Welp, what is tonk? ME

I am ashamed to admit, child me didnt even know these existed in the 90’s. The more i learn about the m18 the more i like it. If i was stupid wealthy one of these would be on my short list.

Stopgap designs exist in a sort of 'liminal space' in regards to what can and cannot, or better yet, _should_ or _should not_ be, considered "cursed" by design. Something engineered fully around spare components and existing technologies which 'simply work' knowing full well what it's limitations are or may be is merely a hack-job jerry-rigged contraption. Not something boasted as new or revolutionary which turns out to be little more use than a tin can, is by definition, cursed. These kinds of videos which cover vehicles like this even in a series better suited to glorious fails of inventions are still appreciated though, as it certainly highlights the comparisons of the equality between an expensive tin can, or a cheap, jerry-rigged glorified 'zip gun', and that how zip guns can often be a wiser choice than a tin can when you know that tin can is prone to just springing a leak each time you try to fill it.. Eventually this type of history will be all but forgotten, relegated to mere footnotes in history books, and covered in the same depth that people cover the history of designs such as bell-mold cast-bronze cannons; brushed right over.

122 sherman, 105 sherman, dd sherman, calliope, sherman crab, skink

M10 is an awesome self propelled anti tank gun. Very low setup time to keep pace with a maneuver battle. Hull down from crest of hill driving along the reverse slope to evade artillery.

Reminds me of the m113 "Gavin" saga.

1:42 is that the leopard 2K ???

3:22 Slight uptier moment (Its kinda lame tough)

War thunder/World of tanks for weebs... I agree with that...

I can guess where he is he is at American Heritage Museum? In Hutson ma if you want to go

I want to know more about number 9

Just imagine if allied forces had the firepower and somewhat protection in the beginning of the war with eventual support of shermans. Alot less soldiers wouldve died

"as a rednecked engineer" Journeyman of about 5 trades(last Electricician millwright) Gramps a WWII Seabee great gramps maybe a shipwright? Granny in so cal aero industry WWII and cold war, cirted in overhead cantinary systems, OJT in back up powers, all fuels, storages, generations, and retail or distrubution? A Deisel ElectricT ANK makes total Sense, then and now. Just like boats! then and now, above or below? Granny from the areo indusrty did ride on a Harley with Jim Turpin to Texas, and allegedly flew to Detroit about 1945 to pick up a GM with a hydromatic V8, mom drove home to So Cal a bit as a little girl allegedly

What a waste probably make two out of one if mounted with 88 or 105 instead.

It sounds like another bad idea by the Germans.

The Jagdpanzer E-100 is a half-fictional tank. It was planned to make a self-propelled gun based on the E-100, but the project was not developed. The documents also mention that it was planned to install a 17 cm gun. Obviously, such a large weapon could only be placed in the rear position of the wheelhouse, otherwise there would be an overload. So the Jagdpanzer E-100 is a historical fiction. Yes, although its entire design is taken from my head, it is based on real concepts.

M18?????

Using war thunder as the visual then shilling world of tanks is wild

like that world of tanks is the sponser why is the intro war thunder

If you want to see the recently restored surviving prototype 1 of the only two vehicles built for testing then Visit Mr Hewes YT channel. (The restorer) Great channel. It also featured at Bovington museums Tank fest in 2024. The gun was actually a British naval gun converted for use in a tank but continuously broke the breach mountings during testing.

Actually its Tank Hunter since different nations Has different names to describe "tank destroyers"

M-massive?

T95=doom turtle T28=tutel

could you do one on the pershings like the t20 t22 and the t25 project for the m26 pershing

It’s very late so I doubt I’ll get a response but does it merge the accounts or just make it so I can play my Xbox one on pc

Used to play AHG Panzerblitz. Hummel and Wespe were a constant presence, great to have for support. Nashorn, however, only showed up in a few scenarios. Properly screened with infantry and armor, they absolutely changed the game. Any open movement (especially on the road) in their LOS was just out of the question, so opponents had to completely change their approach. The definition of oppressive.

Perhaps the hulls should have been lightened, if possible, and all of them used as recovery vehicles or special purpose vehicles. The Germans seemed to have constant shortage of such vehicles.

And Bradley

tank

Better to have a well-trained, tightly-integrated crew with commander and all crew members focused on making optimum use of the main gun.

Sure there was one called "Grasshopper " was a IV with unmountable 10.5 cm howitzer, dont know if it got past the drawing board.

*feline descendants ;)

Dont sweat it LazerPig is a propagandist. Nothing more.

Definitely t28

86 ton tank "Give it a sherman engine"

Taking WT footage and making it black and white for historical footage is genius.

How about the T1E1