KEF KC92 Subwoofer Review with iBX
18:25
Arendal 1723 Center THX Review
20:23
FIRST LOOK! BenQ HT4550i
5:09
Жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@JayPatrol
@JayPatrol 21 сағат бұрын
Sort of like the keg cone
@Muryohken
@Muryohken 23 сағат бұрын
I have the focal Celestees with a ifi Hip-Dac 2 portable USB DAC w/lightening converter, is it worth the upgrade?
@Mutation666
@Mutation666 Күн бұрын
Wish the price was still that low
@mrpickle23
@mrpickle23 Күн бұрын
BASS is complete SHITE from that system even with the larger sub... my Vizio sound bar + sub BLOWS the HTA9 out of the water
@JaskaranSingh-zs3xg
@JaskaranSingh-zs3xg Күн бұрын
i am 16 and my hearing is at 28
@donlew8222
@donlew8222 Күн бұрын
I use these as surrounds and they do a fantastic job with home theatre. I also have a pair in a 2-channel music listening room. Also, a great choice! No complaints. Very happy. I would highly recommend.
@faaldovahkiin3891
@faaldovahkiin3891 Күн бұрын
Hey Joe! I'm new to the scene of calibration. I have the polk xt 20s as my surrounds, L&R, but I have the xt15 as a center. I'm using dirac, but I don't know what to set my master volume at when calibrating my speakers. I was wondering if you could help me out with that. I've set my last set of speakers at -17 dB when calibrating them, but these speakers are different.
@tessie4204
@tessie4204 2 күн бұрын
How does this one compare to the more expensive Marantz MODEL M1?
@user-fd6yp8gl1h
@user-fd6yp8gl1h 2 күн бұрын
I don't usually comment on the review itself, but the way you do it is cool. Good vibes, good content. It's giving me Flipnout vibes (pinball reviews). How would you compare these Arendals to the new SVS ultra evolution pinnacle ? I have them since a week ago, and I'm quite happy, but I'd like to have additionnal clarity on the mids. When a lot of instruments are playing at the same time, it gets just a little bit confusing sometimes.
@oFilhoDodeusSol
@oFilhoDodeusSol 2 күн бұрын
Does anyone still have the assembly diagram available today? Site 123 no longer exists.
@donlew8222
@donlew8222 2 күн бұрын
Fact: Bouncey house speakers DO suck! Atmos is object based, pinpoint sound. Cool testing!! 😃
@Carl-yx1ww
@Carl-yx1ww 3 күн бұрын
60 days is three months now lol
@madcrabber1113
@madcrabber1113 3 күн бұрын
How is this brand over time? Customer service?
@Squishmallows24
@Squishmallows24 3 күн бұрын
$20 to change 1 setting 🙄ugh I feel like an app like this should just be included with your denon purchase, especially when some of these receivers are $2000+
@michaelwyckoff7593
@michaelwyckoff7593 3 күн бұрын
Yo Joe😊
@playmoreguitar5393
@playmoreguitar5393 3 күн бұрын
For the price... I would expect nothing else but brilliant... 😵‍💫
@Layput
@Layput 3 күн бұрын
I tested this and I was not impressed with the bass. I went with PB-1000 instead.
@JoseFerreira-zb7wh
@JoseFerreira-zb7wh 4 күн бұрын
It would be nice to know some other speakers with this feature, mainly some that are better looking to put in my living room 😀 Any other sugestions? I don't mind paying a bit more, but not as much as the Arendals. Maybe something priced somewhat in between but better looking/ finished compared to the Polks.
@dkwan58
@dkwan58 4 күн бұрын
I tested better than expected
@slrhythm2087
@slrhythm2087 4 күн бұрын
Can you do about bose?
@XeroBritt
@XeroBritt 4 күн бұрын
Very thoughtful and articulate review. Thank you!
@chriss881000
@chriss881000 5 күн бұрын
Hey joe😊 have u ever heard the jbl hdi 3800? I am wondering how the bass is in the 1723 compare to the jbl.
@Karto86
@Karto86 5 күн бұрын
Plot twist - our ears are not microphones, the ears and ear canals boost certain frequencies, and there's the brain interprating it all...
@pristlehk
@pristlehk 5 күн бұрын
Hi Mr Joe, pls try with Elac debut 2 if possible and pls let us know your opinion
@sudd3660
@sudd3660 5 күн бұрын
i been saying eq is a huge deal for along time. best thing i ever did was getting all sealed speakers and eq them to my liking. i also bought some sealed Arendal's for directivity.
@celstark
@celstark 6 күн бұрын
Omg! The WiiM units got 10 band PEQ!!
@catatonicgalaxy1471
@catatonicgalaxy1471 6 күн бұрын
good product... but guess what theres a new game in town.... tonewinner ... d2000 , d4000, d6000. 12 inch 12 inch and 15 inch. Also has built in bluetooth for your phone app. Much better value. You need to review these subwoofers
@antiWhiteism777
@antiWhiteism777 6 күн бұрын
@joentell --- Are the physical locations of speakers in DTS, Auro, and Dolby surround sound configurations incompatible? How can someone listen to all three without having to move speakers constantly?
@Brian_Romska
@Brian_Romska 6 күн бұрын
Hey Joe! You’re doing great man keep it up! It looks like you’ve got your hands full with all the very technical comments and a decent amount of shade, sorry dude. I’m not smart enough to understand any of that, but I do already have a few pairs of speakers and the WiiM amp and the Apple dongle so I think I’ll give your magic beans a try and see if I have any fun, I bet I will, thanks!!!
@user-zo9xw6pt8i
@user-zo9xw6pt8i 6 күн бұрын
So polk xr20 vs Monolith by Monoprice THX Certified Satellite Speakers?
@joentell
@joentell 5 күн бұрын
Polks are larger which means they can play louder and have more bass extension. The Monolith compact satellite are good for small rooms, at a desk, or as height speakers.
@user-zo9xw6pt8i
@user-zo9xw6pt8i 5 күн бұрын
I am in a small room 13×9 8ft ceilings. The main listing position is at the far wall (bedroom), but I do want to use all the same speakers. 70% movies and tv, 20% xbox series x ,and 10% music. My concern is the 13 ft vewing distance with the monoprices' low sensitivity for the front set, but the polk are rear ported, so they need to be away from the wall. I plan to use dirac and magic beans. Should I mix and match? Keep looking for a different speaker? Just use one of these? Jtr and ascendo speakers seem the closest but $$$$$. Lol What is your opinion?
@joentell
@joentell 5 күн бұрын
@@user-zo9xw6pt8i maybe use the Polks for the main speakers and Monolith for height. I assume you will use a sub
@dilbyjones
@dilbyjones 6 күн бұрын
Yes! Nice approach
@daleboylen6427
@daleboylen6427 6 күн бұрын
Erin's method is the better of the two. if the speaker is properly designed (BIG IF), the ROOM is causing issues, especially in low frequencies, as the average living room is simply not designed to reproduce deep bass (something to do with wave lenghts and physics, which Joe doesn't believe in). The room will cause both peaks and cancellations, as Erin correctly pointed out. While you can "tame" peaks with EQ, there is nothing you can do about cancellations with EQ, Joe. If it's not there, it's not there. Now, are you sure what you're hearing is a room node and not low frequency phase shift? Room "Correction" doesn't work. Room TREATMENT does a much better job. Then you eliminate the added time delays caused by the DSP eq, having one more piece of electronics in the signal path. Of course, people today don't want to do room treatment. Takes time. DSP is easy. I have to remember this generation invented instant rice because minute rice took too long. I know a recording studio owner who EQ'd his vocal booth using an I-phone app. SMH. A PROPERLY designed speaker should never sound "Chesty" in the voice range, Joe. I know, I'm wrong, you are right. I haven't changed anything in my system since 2004 other than DAC, and you seem to be the one never happy, constantly messing around with DSP trying to find the "Magic beans" to take the place of engineering. You remind me a bit of that dude in Canada, Jay, who bragged about owning over 70 pair of speakers before becoming an audio reviewer. What's the definition of insanity again? Before upgrading speakers, you may just want to look at upstream components, as all a better speaker can possibly do is more clearly reveal the fault of those components. No speaker, no matter who makes it, can IMPROVE on the signal it is being sent. Magic beans or no magic beans. Stop with the gimmicks and put some research into your systems is my advice. If you like the nonsense from Joe here, you'll LOVE Randy's channel at Cheapaudioman. By all means do NOT listen to guys that know what they are talking about. This is "Fun fi" and where's the fun in learning from them? Far better to piss money away on say a Wiim amp with a puny 48 volt power supply, a TI 3255 IC chip output, lacking the current needed to PROPERLY play music, that doesn't play well with high impedance speakers (many of which go VERY high) and has a rising frequency response in the top end, then blame it on the speakers and use the built in 10 band EQ to "Fix" the poorly designed amplifier. You could also use cables as tone controls if you have a LOT of money to piss away.
@joentell
@joentell 5 күн бұрын
Ok, Mr. "Room Nodes." Look that up and tell me if that's the correct term. It shows you've never read anything about it or you would know better. You've only heard it which is why you don't know the correct spelling. Maybe this might help: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gobYqpKnrqmmnposi=PkuiowfFHAlNSORl
@daleboylen6427
@daleboylen6427 4 күн бұрын
@@joentell For fucks sake Joe. You're STILL trying to win an audio argument with me? It is not possible that you can win this. You couldn't prove my math wrong,, so now you've resorted to spell check. And send me another of your videos to watch On Dolby nodes? I'm starting to think this is more of a status thing to you than a knowledge thing.
@daleboylen6427
@daleboylen6427 4 күн бұрын
@@joentell I mention room nodes, IE standing waves, and you send me dolby nodes? Dolby is an encode/decode noise reduction. Im talking about standing waves, which you can calculate by multiplying your room dimensions by either 4 or 2. Divide those into the speed of sound (1130 feet per second) to get room NODES. When a second room dimension is added it's bad news when it's resonance frequency coincides with any other dimensions. It assumes the speakers are flush against a wall. If your room absorbs at 125hz say, you may NOT get a standing wave even though the math says you should. Sudden boundary changes, like an L-shaped room or a ceiling that jogs up reflect sound as if they were a real boundary This is because the acoustic impedance changes instantly--the sound pressure is suddenly free to expand. Sheer waves are not normally discussed in acoustic books because they are less loud, but never the less audible. The math can be found for this in Lord Rayleigh's "The Theory of Sound" book published in 1877. The frequency ranges of diffusion are necessary and determined by the size of the room and the materials in it, Measuring the actual reverberation time in any room at each frequency requires sophisticated instruments. To start, you MUST find out the coefficient of absorption" specs in EACH material, in EACH frequency range. See, it's as simple as "Early reflections" right? I actually have about 6 pages on this topic,. I'm probably NOT your typical KZbin commenter....perhaps you've figured this out. As far back as the early 1980's, Yamaha called me for advice on how to improve their amplifiers. I was happy to advise. A major issue with those 70's and 80's Japanese amps (Not just Yamaha though they were the biggest abuser) was their massive overuse of global negative feedback. Lowers THD but creates transient distortions such as TIM, or Transient Inter- modulation Distortion, which is far more offensive, as is anything to do with phase errors. Nelson Pass had to correct the opposite problem from early Adcom amps like the GFA1 which blew themselves up do to instability issues. He did a fine job on the 535, 545, 555 series. I digress. Hope my info on room standing waves (Nodes) helps.
@joentell
@joentell 4 күн бұрын
@@daleboylen6427 it's room Modes, not Nodes. You're welcome.
@daleboylen6427
@daleboylen6427 6 күн бұрын
YOU REALLY have gotten full of yourself Joe. Again, you're wrong. Now your questioning Paul? Again, a microphone cannot hear up, down, left or right. Only distance. When you listen to recordings, in the vast majority of them, you are hearing dozens of MONO mic recordings, placed between left and right by the engineer. If your speakers are imaging way to the outside, or above the physical plane, that is most likely time delays due to poor design.
@joentell
@joentell 5 күн бұрын
A viewer looked up your name. It seems you didn't find much success with your album. I'm sorry about that.
@lukabosnjak3829
@lukabosnjak3829 6 күн бұрын
Hope you'll possibly test the upcoming cheap boombox from Earfun (Uboom X) which is being tuned by Oluv's gadgets, conclusion so far is that a cheap Chinese boombox, as long as it doesn't have any flaws in the driver design like this Earfun, can sound nicer than most stereo systems for 10x the price...
@crm484
@crm484 6 күн бұрын
I am torn between Klipsch R-41 PM or Kanto Ora. There Will be a sub. Usage Will be for gaming and movies in a smaller office. Any advice?
@Norman-bone13
@Norman-bone13 7 күн бұрын
I like your style and attitude towards gear. It’s the music! 🎶 Found you thru Daily HiFi now subbed to Joe N Tell. Have you reviewed any Cambridge Audio streamers like the MXN10?
@alaingingras7224
@alaingingras7224 7 күн бұрын
Colours the sound .Try with and without on an oscilloscope....Distortion meter....Even a pilot light in a amplifier will do something not good...Nice gadget though.
@ryanchappell5962
@ryanchappell5962 7 күн бұрын
If you have a mini DSP 2X4, you can bypass the crossover and just about any speaker and drastically improved the directivity index. You’ll also get rid of all the nastiness from the low parts quality, practically all speakers have. You would lower distortion by being able to use a higher order crossover, which also improves the directivity index because there is far less overlap in the drivers which is where most of your issues come from regarding directivity index. I don’t know why more people are not doing this, it’s very easy to run speaker wires straight through the port and you don’t have to damage anything inside the speaker, just unhook the terminals from the drivers and then connect your wires directly to the bare drivers and then use the mini DSP to do all crossover functions. If you ever want to go back to the internal passive crossover, you can do that!
@chinmeysway
@chinmeysway 7 күн бұрын
w your sound demos it’s not really working to compare the two speakers bc of switching to the original track in between them.
@joentell
@joentell 7 күн бұрын
It's more about comparing each speaker to the reference track. So, it's an indirect comparison.
@michaelgochez7768
@michaelgochez7768 7 күн бұрын
Joe, although the XT has more bass, do you think the Arendal can probably play louder giving it more dynamic range? Making it better suited for HT?
@joentell
@joentell 7 күн бұрын
I'm confident of that. We used these bookshelf speakers at a recent audio show and we were blasting it at times. The 4 x 10" subs were giving up before these were.
@tonyt.5771
@tonyt.5771 8 күн бұрын
I have the Paradigms 8000's, wonder if any of these match up to my monsters? I deleted my sub with these btw, they kick ass.
@srtswpak47
@srtswpak47 8 күн бұрын
Isn't the 1723 high passed by design? It lacks in bass and is designed to be used with subs. What SPL could the Polks play at?
@joentell
@joentell 8 күн бұрын
It seems like it is built that way on purpose. Not sure about the Polk SPL. Loud enough for me in my room running full-range.