I think jesus didn't die he just went into coma and wake up and people believed it was resurrection

Fairy tale for adults.

long live all of them

It's hilarious that atheists never have any evidence that God doesn't exist . It is even more hilarious when evolutionists have no evidence to prove non - existent evolution .

The best reason for believing in God . God has proven himself billions of times . Every time a baby is born , it is the gift of life from God . Only God can create life . Scientists certainly cannot create life . Dolly the Sheepinstein was a heartless , souless clone . I know that atheism has nothing to do with evolution , so are you an atheist who wants to shed the shackles of the ridiculous belief of evolution ? Then please at least question evolution . Darwin is not infallible . Do not make him into some sort of a god . Denounce Darwin and his pseudo science . Jesus is the truth and he is alive today . Darwin was a lying con man , sob , snake oil salesman , perverted finch molester and the son of the devil . Check out Ben Stein's excellent documentary ' Expelled : No Intelligence Allowed ', which there are brilliant scientists who are fired simply because they questioned the ' almighty ' Darwin . All Darwin is , is a troublemaker !

I am so grateful no one is forced to believe in God . Because i certainly would not want to be forced into believing in the ridiculous , asinine , moronic belief of non - existent evolution .

Terrific explanation. But please get yourself a better videographer. That first shot is lovely (if over lit). But that second angle is an abomination, and doesn’t match the first at all!!! If you can’t do two angles well, stick with one.

Morality and religion is not the same.😇

Around 55:15 "Judaism is the root of the problem"

I watch a lot of these speeches and debates and Richard Dawkins is the only one where I don't immediately skip to lecturer.

Very okay discussion. Do you really want to totally end tax exemption for religion writ large? Do we have an example of a society without religion entirely, where a foundational school of ethics is presented first class?? I think evidence is evidence and industry is industry, but you cant axe the church for convenience and educationa sake without sacrificing something...like moral conventions are begotten from *responsible* churches. And its a shame we have to even underscore that, but that underscores my point further. Shame on megachurches, and the megachurch of marketing. And humanism, ethics, and even old-world moralisms can coexist with new age natural and social sciences. Thank you

Lemaitre did say what you are quoting. He saw the Mastermind who brought the Universe into existence. Science proves the existence of God. What you are explaining is how God brought things into existence. YOU CANNOT SEPERATE SCIENCE FROM GOD NO MATTER HOW HARD YOU TRY. SCIENCE IS RELIGION. Nothing is Nothing.... You are talking about something and calling it nothing??😂😂😂

I love how the camera cuts to the fire after Dawkins says _"burning in hell"_ 1:54

I believe it's because many men who are actually homosexual or somewhat homosexual are not integrated and only behave as if they were heterosexual. They only choose mates who are of the opposite sex out of social rejection.

We as children see the order which random processes without deep implicit order in each part. Dawkins says DNA is chemical ROM, and digital base 64 megabytes of "Solves the problem of," for human's need for explanation. Not looking at the big picture of how the dance beneath works. If no Transcendent God, then no Imago Dei. Follow the science of that. You really would not wish to live there.

What a gem. I wonder if Dawkins and R. Sheldrake have talked before. Sheldrake famously points out that some of the universe's "constants" have changed throughout definition and time

I hope this comment finds you well Dr. Hawkins. I do think 65 million years is far too short of a time for millions of things going right one after another, to produce us, and every other life around us. This universe rules the laws of entropy, where order turns to disorder. Not the other way around. I also think this universe had no beginning and no end. An oscillating universe that keeps blowing up as a single black hole after trillions of years. God is in the details. God is the universal mind that manifests in evolutionary beings everywhere the environment allows. DNA is like an infection that travels the universe via panspermia. Life is an infection of sorts. You are not wrong about religion's God being a hoax and man-made. However, you stopped their and didn't go after the goal of a God. What would a God want most of all? My conclusion is it would want to live as all the life forms possible. Learn as much as possible at each iteration of the universe. In order to do that, It needs a universe that mimics a brain that could act as an evolutionary amplifier, with galaxies interconnected by hydrogen highways. Yes, the latest research has proven me right. That there are ionized hydrogen highways between galaxies. What is the purpose of them? Our brain, is just like the universe. All interconnected neurons, acting as one mind. The universal mind, uses galaxies instead of neurons. When we destroy ourselves, it won't make the slightest difference. There are thousands of other more advanced civilizations that are not blood thirsty violent apes, but also humanoid! How is that possible if the evolution was not written into to the mathematical equations we call reality? That also explains the alien presence on Earth for centuries, and human abductions for medical biopsies. It explains animal mutations with only certain organs removed. These beings are also after knowledge. They are studying us and our societies for hundreds of years. They want to become Gods themselves. They are doing what we dream of doing today with Ai and robotics. Except ours is a pathetic attempt and theirs is genetics engineering on the level we can't even dream of. There is a God. He lives as all life everywhere. He might even be an Ai we are so afraid of. When there is no spacetime, any computer can simulate an infinite universe under the rule of mathematical models. Be well.

Best explanation I have heard so far. The human condition is so complex and varied. Such amazing creatures who need to make the most of their time and leave the world a better place for the next generation!

2 horsemen left :( RIP Hicthens & Dennet <3

Where tf is the common ancestors

Enjoy the moment,,, eat hearty, In hell there is no ,,,, what you’d call food , 🪱🦗🪲🪰🕷️🦎🐍🦇🦨🐁🐀, or drink ,,,🚽🚽🚽type of people you can preach too 🧟🧟‍♀️🧌🧛🏼‍♀️a horror chamber🫣😱fires are never put out🔥🥵🔥foul smell 💩🤧🤮,,, well everything opposite of Heaven,

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

#Evolution did it 😂

Uh, Bishop Dennett, you need to trim your beard (less and thinner is better) and make it more pleasing to the eyes, less distracting and make you more credible in your expositions. A messy beard says you have no time for mundane amenities. It also says something about personal hygiene. You look inrelligent enough with your glasses and actually dont need your beard as an added prop. You also need to fix your tie. That said, re your exposition: I still have to hear you say what your actual position is on the God Question. Is he real to you or not? If not, why not? For humble me, I believe in God because of you being you in your honest opinion of who or what God is. I call this his unique gift of Freewill, a no-holds-barred, freewilling, off-the-cuff, honest to goodness to do as you please type of freedom to say or think about him without diminishing or demeaning yourself in his divine sight as his precious image of himself. You still need to trim that beard. No excuses accepted.

19:26 listening to this in 2024, I'm shocked how he anticipated that

There is a lot to be learned by sharing in this discussion. I find it so illuminating to watch _how_ these great minds share the time and conversation when you *_know_* each one of them has books upon books of knowledge and insight to share on these topics. So rewarding to experience. About 9:02, I think Sam's point is that we need to retake the language confiscated by religion and redefine it in a non-supernatural way. If we can do that, people will have a way to identify and share their experiences with a shared language that does not require a supernatural aspect. And I think that is important and practical in terms of reaching out to people. Note for my future discussions: Take a drink when you are done with your point.

God created life and the universe and the trees . Hallelujah ! Darwin didn't create anything . Darwin was a bozo . With Jesus , we can live forever . With Darwin , there is only death .

Stephen Hawking and the No Boundary Proposal. "I still believe the universe has a beginning in real time, at the big bang. But there's another kind of time, imaginary time, at right angles to real time, in which the universe has no beginning or end." -Stephen Hawking Black Holes and Baby Universes If as Stephen Hawking believed before he died, that the universe always existed ... that does away completely with the theory that the universe was created. If his theory was correct ... then there wasn't any creator ... or plan ... and that would mean that suffering of all forms of life always was ... and is ... natural. It would also mean that energy and consciousness in one form or another also always existed. And concerning that system of belief that the universe always existed ... Stephen was not alone. From the book … 2000 Years of Disbelief … author … James A. Haugt … “None of the gods has formed the world, nor has any man; it has always been.”-Empedocles (495-435 B.C.E.), Greek philosopher and statesman (Noyes) … “The universe has been made neither by gods nor by men, but it has been, and is, and will be eternally.”-Heraclitus (Noyes) ... “The nature of the universe has by no means been made through divine power, seeing how great are the flaws that mar it”-Lucretius, ibid.

Rational thinking is a wonderful tool, but it has its limitations. Like any other computational system, the quality of its output is dependent on the quality of its inputs: its starting premises. When thinking about Life, the inputs include our own experience and our paradigm, i.e., our basic understanding of what the world is and how it works. One's paradigm can even determine what kinds of evidence and argument are considered reasonable, and how much weight (credence) to give to a particular type of evidence. For seekers of truth, it is important to recognize one's own paradigm, one's own preconceptions -- whether physicalist, theist, or anything else -- and to be willing to seek new experience. "And therefore as a stranger give it welcome. There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy."

Dawkins and Dennett are not atheists after all . Charles Darwin is their God . Darwin is not infallible . Please stop making him into some sort of a god . Question evolution , please . There is no evidence for evolution . No one has ever seen a filthy ape ' magically ' turn into a human . That would be a huge story on CNN , wouldn't it ?

Only God can create life . Scientists cannot create life . Dolly the Sheepinstein was a heartless , soulless clone .

Gossips of 4 (spiritually) idiots.

At our wonderful Fundamental Baptist Church , when a member passes we call it a thrill that they have gone home to be with the Lord . We worship Jesus , who is the creator of life and the universe . We find Darwin irrelevant . Darwin has nothing to do with life . Jesus is the truth and he is alive today . Darwin was a lying con man , snake oil salesman , perverted finch molester and the son of the devil . This worship of Darwin has got to stop . He is not infallible . I urge everyone to at least question the ridiculous dogma of Darwinist evolution .

I don't think religion is going to be broken down by argument, I think it will only(and should only) be broken down when a better answer to the exact problems religion addresses(orientation in the world, ontological security, a love-enabling grounding in reality, and wisdom in a form that is accessible to all walks of life) is provided.

I know im late, i know these four horsemen, even before hitch died.. but listening them talk? I always felt like i have 2 personalties, hitchens and dawkins.. idfkw??!

It’s a shame Sam Harris is a sellout

Even militant atheists look for “meaning” in their existence. They have to come to terms that their existence is no more meaningful than the life of an earthworm. “How heartwarming!” (sarcasm intended). Sanjosemike (no longer in CA)

I always come back to this video again and again. Hitchens is surely missed though I’m not sure about Dennett, who I find annoying cause he just won’t shut up plugging as he puts it, “in my book”. Geez, there are ways you can assert your point/opinion without having to mention it time and time again.

Ahh, this reminds me of the good old days of being an atheist and trying to justify why on earth I should be happy instead of frightened and sad until a new breeze of feelings or activity came about that took my attention off of death and being a little speck in the universe that ultimately doesn't matter at all. Oh, how I miss those days of glorious misery!

Can enyone else imagine a world without religion? A world with less harm, a world with less vilonce?😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌😌 I'm doing it right now

I watch this video once a year, and whenever my friends are doing something annoying I tell them to "you must regret from your fucking behaviour"

If evolution was true they wouldnt need to make thousands of videos telling everyone why its true. Are they trying to convince us or them?

Empty gossip talk.

05:45 someone with rights to this content PLEASE make a pocket tee with this printed on it: Shoes have chirality, Socks do not. - Richard Dawkins

0:09

When talking puzzles and mysteries Daniel Dennet disagrees with Noam Chomsky that mysteries are insolvable. In other words mysteries are puzzles yet to be solved. I think he misses a massive reality here, and that is fundamentally the dilemma of the human personality. It is that the personality simply cannot rest until the mystery has been resolved. That is the nature of the personality. There are humans however, whose personality has been seen to not really exist other than as a kind of illusion, that rest in the mystery. In other words the problem is the search, and liberation is the end of the seeker. This is different than religion because it is not in any way a belief, it is a simple seeing of what already is. Where Daniel is accurate is when he says that mystery has no place in Science. That’s true. And religion in its clumsy and arrogant way tries to occupy the space that that leaves.

THREE HORSEMEN - Richard Dawkins is a "cultural Christian" which is basically a fancy way of calling yourself a Christian.

When someone says to me in a rather patronising way, "I'll pray for you", I reply with, 'And I'll think for you.' Having said that, I know someone who is a strong believer in God and Jesus but does not push his beliefs on anyone or judge them for not believing, and he has often said to me that he'll pray that things go well for me, and I'm rather touched by his kind consideration.

Can't stand when everyone is trying to talk over the other

I'm not religious but I'm not too much of a fan of Dawkins's crusade against religion. Why is he so obsessed with it. I think there is a lot of wisdom in many religions. Is he like Jacob always wrestling with an angel in his head.... He's preaching here