From Gtx 970 to Rtx 3060 12gb

"Historically Nvidia Launches High End Products First" The problem is that Nvidia ONLY launches high end products. Lowest end products from Nvidia is 4070/5070. And anything below 4070 is just an absolute joke anyway. Most cards don't even get enough VRAM to run games at 1080p...

The 4070S is the better card, however I will probably pick the 7900 Gre because : - I want a GPU with a good and quiet cooler : The Sapphire Pure 7900 gre costs around 590€ in my country and the MSI Gaming x 4070S costs 715€. So a 125€ difference. - GPU temps are really good on the 7900Gre (55 degrees on average is crazy) - I use DLSS on my laptop with a 1440p screen and I consistently find it to be a blurry mess (i prefer playing at 1080p actually) but that may be something that i'm doing wrong seeing how much you can't notice the difference. - 12Go of VRAM is not an issue today for sure but I can't be sure that it will be the case in the future, especially since DLSS and FG use VRAM to run properly. With all that said, if the price of the 4070S drops to that of the 7900Gre, i'll buy the 4070S.

hey which tgp on gpu?

Stalker 2 is more demanding and i tested the game at gamescom on pc. Yet to be tested when it gets release in sep 5th

got a 4080s for 930 usd, cheapest xtx was same price so for vr went with super

Coil whine ?

illogical. cs2 giving more fps with 7800x3d than 7700x. check anywhere youtube/reddit.

If your budget is below 800$, then its all AMD. dont even think about buying nvidia.

What model is that i cant find it on pc part picker?

vram man vram

This game barely looks any better than games released 5 years ago, yet fails to run smoothly even on the best hardware currently available. The competency crisis is real

Would this be fine with the non X

The beautify with AMD is that their GPUs age well. AMD uses open source tech and new tech is supported on old gear. You can bet that the next gen FSR will be supported on this and older cards.

When it comes to frames, I've noticed it's no longer a GPU power problem. It's a game optimization problem.

Peoppe just don't understand bottlenecks. Everyone thinks they never have bottlnecking and throw budget cpus or old cpus on and think oh I don't have one lol. It's sickening how lacking people are on knowledge about bottlenecks.

Doesn't work that way.

back in 2023 i upgraded from gtx 1060 6gb to rtx 3060 12gb and my pc spces r amd ryzen 5 2600x and 32gb 3000 ddr 4 ram

core clock +30 and mem clock +200 causes stuttering in some games and graphical artifacts eg: pink gradients. hud disappearing. recordings get really weird

you dont know your setting sin game my boy this video is useless

Is it possible to make a rtx 4070ti super + i7 13k under 1500$ is it possible beo

Limit FPS to 165 and utilise G-Sync, using DLSS etc..

rtx3060 12gb vs rtx4060 when i got a bew pc prebuilt(why some ask...i cant build myself) The price on the parts n gpus was not extremly different but the prebuilt pc was about 500euro more expensive w a rtx4060 vs rtx3060ti or 12gb version so thats why i got a rtx3060 12gb and a huge fact was that people told me to get w 12gb so i dont need trouble like w old gtx1650 4gb gpu i had n gamed on before(horrible when the vram just aint enough) So was it stupid is what i still ask myself when i see that the rtx4060 has alot of more fps in almost all games(a few games that demands over 8gb vram that are peretty close w the older 30series gpu) 500 euro difference would it have been worth it in 2023/12/31 so about 6 months back now.. Also what will i need to save up to next time to be able to game in 1080p ultra settings w r.t on?? example rtx4070ti or super in a prebuilt w a ok cpu that works ok w the gpu will this be enough in about 12months or 18months even?? I know that the 50series rtx fpus are soon comming so the rtx5060 and rtx5070 how will they compare to todays higly used 1080p gaming cards(rtx3060/4060 and amds gpus) Will it(mayby)Be better to get a rtx5060 when it comes vs a rtx4070ti prebuilt pc...This is pretty hard to say before info has come about the hardware i guess?? Anyway 1080p max settings with Ray tracing at maximum what is n will be needed to run it for me in 1years time up to 18months(if we say 10-15% increase in games that will come vs whats needed today for same gameplay at maximum in 1080p) Hope u understand what i try to ask(dont know this stuff n dont really know where to look either to be 100% sure) Thanks 4 this great video alot of info

You were blaming poor quality on AMD and FSR rather than on the game implementation of that technology.

good test

rtx 4070 super in Netherlands is 100 euro more

buen video bro justo lo que buscaba comprare el 3x

192bit bus, full x16 lanes, 12gb vram .... and by applying ultra textures ,+ mods 12gb vram will definitely come in handy. ofc it will provide less fps than 4060 in some latest titles but it will be smooth and stable and atleast no texture blurrs or stutters.... and even framge generation needs more vram hence 4060 is already struggling on vram hungry games. the most + point of 4060 is its tdp and full av1 support. if 4060 had 12gb or 16gb vram then definitely it would be worthy but with 8gb vram and 128bit bus?! no

see here is where the argument falls apart, One you take time bitching about fsr3 on hellblade 2, but its a short segmate on a rather new game and you dont show case the same issues being present, it seems like you have an issue with one game not working right. so you have to try and make a case issue around one thing and try to be cool youtube dude and get clicks to make money. you just have a bias you refuse to admit.

How??? I play at the same settings, but I have a RX 7600, and my AW2 ran in 42 fps where you were on the map, in the middle of the forest. 12 fps difference between RX 7600 and RTX 4070 Super??? Also, you can play with raytracing. I render the game at 720p upscaled to 4k, low preset settings, pathtracing and raytracing on low, and I average 29 fps by the body.

I just bought a Prebuilt PC a few weeks ago with this very configuration ( i5 14400F + 4070 SUPER) and I have been playing Half-Life: Alyx with a mix of High/Ultra settings via Virtual Desktop and the Meta Quest 3 with absolutely no problems whatsoever.... it's actually incredible what Valve has been able to do with this game, it really has to be experienced in VR to understand just how lifelike it is. 2D videos don't even come _Close_ to doing it justice.

Alienware aurora r3, Gtx 980, cpu i7 3600 oc to 3.9, very high settings ,3640x2160, no Ray 32 inch monitor, tracing, runs horizon zero dawn game nicely It takes a couple of minutes to load

Alienware aurora r3, Gtx 980, cpu i7 3600 oc to 3.9, very high settings ,3640x2160, no Ray 32 inch monitor, tracing, runs this game nicely It takes a couple of minutes to load

Honestly i never had any issues with amd fsr and most issues people tend too point out you'll have too really stop sometimes and zoom in too see these imperfections they talk about , but its never ground breaking were its killing my immersion in the game too the point that i don't enjoy the visuals .

Hellsovers 2 is broken. Fps drops to 15-20 when theres a ton of enemies and explosions in 4 players online. Sad thing is the game is using a really old engine (bitsquid)

The crappiest RTX 4070 Super vs an actual decent 7900 GRE. I know there isn't a whole lot of difference between models. I just hate the Msi Ventus design. It looks awful in my opinion. If it at least looked cool I would consider it. I tell myself once it's in the PC it won't matter how it looks. Once I see how well it games I'll be fine with it. And then I look through the glass side panel and can't stand what I'm looking at. PC gaming hardware is one of my favorite hobbies and I'm passionate about it. If you think you can get away with something you don't really like in this area of your life just stop. You can't do it. I don't mean PC gaming in general I mean in an area of your life that you're passionate about. If you sell yourself short on something you love you'll be sad. You won't be happy. I tried going to AMD and getting an RX 7700 XT and I wanted to be happy with it but I just couldn't. I had to get an Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti Super. Got the Tuf Asus OC model. I know Asus is bad now but I actually like their cards.

Ive got to say games have so many lines now and so much stuff going on that anti aliasing use has gotten crazy. Or i mean aliasing in general in games. Its funny the more graphically demanding a game is the more flaws that come into play take alan wake as an example. When I got back into pc gaming i was shocked by the graphics but I also noticed all of the flaes, jaggies, noise, aliasing etc. Shimmering etc. But god its all worth it at the end of the day haha. Some games have come so so far. But akot of people get into high end gaming and get a little bummed because they think something is wrong with there pc but I want those people to know its normal! Dont look for perfection. You wont find it just sit back and enjoy. Also im sry but on a single player game even on a 4070 super its worth using ray tracing and dlss. Just use balanced dlss and crank ray tracing up. Enjoy! Imo when you play games like that you dont need 100fps. Not to mention with my testing ive found some ganes feel better at a stable 60fps compared to 200fps. People get way way to caught up into the fps. Way to many other things that play part in a smooth experience. Tedt it out dont try paying attention to frames all the time and try seeing which settings feel best for you. It may surpise you! Lol

I'm happy with high performance 1440p. I got this card for a moderate future proofing of current performance.

What people forget is that when you build a new rig, you should look at the TDP of the whole rig. In my case my new pc is 40w less than my previous pc was with a full new build and a way better gpu (3070 before and now 7900gre). In that case who cares about the higher power draw. At the end of the day you either want raw performance or you want ray tracing and dlss. I couldnt care less about dlss and ray tracing

fsr is still improving month by month . They will improve it but it will take years to reach dlss . Just like intel gpus and their drivers . So its not really good to compare them in q upscaling etc. Also dont forget that dlss and fsr give bad latency , so the game will be less responsive depending on the preset.

7900 gre is faster in raw perfomance with higher power usage. 4070 s is better in RT obv. and has better upscaling. But personally I prefer to play at native res, on these type of cards.. I feel like i pay a lot of money and then to use upscaling tech to get fps, when they already should deliver that target fps (idk 60, 80 etc..). Both cards are good. When i bought my 7900 gre was only because of the lower price than the 4070 super which was about 100 euros here so yeah. I would say, you can't go wrong with any one of them. Pick the one which is cheaper but if you want RT 100% just go with 4070 s.

Hello. Great channel and work put into it. Today YT suggested it to me on the main page. Could you please make a video on the basics of DDR4 RAM overclocking and timing settings? Greetings

I upgraded from an i7-8700k/ 1660ti to an R9 5900x. Just ordered the 7900 gre. I should be good for the next few years i hope lol

I have a 3060 as well but the frames really tank in helldivers 2 when theres 4 players with tons of automatons, explosions etc to 15-20fps at times and others with even faster setups have been experience those massivw drops.this js on 1080p. I've tried low, medium, high and ultra and it seems to get worse after recent updates

Amazing Sir 🎉 Which Gigabyte Monitor Is That 😊😊

im buying the new ryzen cpu and Ai gpu

👏👏👏👌👌👌

Dlss is the line I could never cross. I'm willing to give up slight raster , and more vram for the nonsense it gives. Which is +40% performance for almost the same quality as native ,and vram+power reduction boost.

Nvidia cards are crap but their DLSS is saving them. If AMD gets their act together they can kill it. Just look how close the 7900xtx gets to the 4090. Have good upscaling and AMD competes again.

Just bought myself 7900gre, picking it from post office tomorrow. bit cheaper than 4070 super ...and to be honest if aint buying any radeons, its not like they are getting any better. Thought some consummate nvidiots dont maybe see it, pure nvidia monopoly wouldnt lead to anything good. And it someone who bought couple 1080ti's and both 3080fe + 3070, but i wanted to swap the 3080fe to something more silent and for my current needs 7900gre ought to be pretty good value. Really looking towards intel and hoping theyll come up with some nice and bit more powerful soon. Nvidia could really use the competition.