very clear explanation. Thank you. Do you do personal tutoring?

thanks Amanda

Very helpful.

❤🎉

Hey Amanda! Your videos have been very helpful. Do you plan on recording lectures for easements, covenants, and mortgages?

@compadan when Polly and Esme had an agreement, it only means that the joint tenancy changes into tenancy in common. But it is not stated that it is bought yet, so Polly still owns it until the Esme buys it, which is not the case. So that in the table, Polly and Esme still have the same share (3/8)

So helpful!! Thank you

Thank you so much

Hi, would the case of Gore and Snell v Carpenter not be the authority for 'immediate and unequivocal intention to sever' instead of Harris v Goddard?

Will this apply to multiple problem questions? Where would be the case where there will be differences? Can you please make more videos on this topic? please is in my exam and I am so scared

I dont understand why Michael still has an interest in the property in any way if Polly had already sold her share to Esme???

Hi, I am currently writing an essay on Re Rose [1952] and Pennington v Waine and i am struggling to fins some academic opinions and arguments on the cases, have you got any suggestions? Thank you :)

Thank you, so clearly explained.

Please provide more bite-sized tutorial films❤❤❤

Hi there, do you have any lectures on Restrictions, please?

I have subscribed it Malawi. Thank you

Thank you so much

Thanks this was really helpful :)

Are you able to explain why the trust for the parent are under a constructive trust not a resultant trust? I agree it’s a constructive trust for Boris but not sure why the parents though?

I have just come across your channel. You explain things so clearly and well. Thank you so much.

Absolutely useful for a complete beginner like me! Thank you so much for your effort!

Would this trust be an implied trust?

You are great, i haven't been able to attend university due to some personal issues and your lectures helped me alot ... Stay Blessed ♥️

Helpful table

Very clear and helped me understand thank you

Thank you

Could you please link part 2 and others please.. Great work 🙂🙏

Thank you for the video, but the audio does not work :(

Amazing video and playlist! Helping me perform much better! Just a question at 17:37. Why would it matter if Boris had an interest anyways, would she have to pay that £10,000 to him if she wasn’t a bona fide? How does Boris get his £10,000 back? From Victoria?

your videos are great and really simplify a complex topic!

Your lectures are excellent. They have made me realise land law is interesting after all! *Please* will you upload videos 3 and 4 in the Registered Title sequence?

Thank you....I like simple and clear :)

Thank You

Really helpful thank you.

This video is very helpful thank you. I do have a question though: - after Polly severs, how come Esme does not remain a joint tenant and Polly and Grace are the tenancy in common. So basically, why do PEG all become tenancy in common? Thanks in advance

there's no sound?

This was so helpful. Thank you!

This is very helpful thank you

Thank you so much for this video! At one point you say that a lease for 6 years is an estate? why is it an estate and not an interest? thank you

This is extremely helpful!!!!! Thank you!

Hi, thank you for this helpful video. What about Linda? (Arthur died shortly afterwards, leaving all his property to Linda)

Best explanation so I have seen Thank you 😊 ❤

Tysm

👍👍👍

Legend- finals feel easier with your videos

Thank you 🙏🏽

At 17:41, is the authority for the rule s2 LPA 1925, or does it include s27 LPA 1925 as well?

At 16:42, where did the rule mention that the beneficial interest was created under a constructive trust? The conclusion included 'constructive trust', but this wasn't mentioned in the rule. Was there a step that was skipped? Thank you.

What is the motivation behind overreaching occuring when there are two legal owners and not when there is only one?

Hello, do you give tuition in property law for MA Law?