Worst Sony Lens Ever Made?
5:17
2 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@louiskoh.0822
@louiskoh.0822 21 сағат бұрын
Should I change my Sony ZV-1F with A6000?
@anatolstepanets6855
@anatolstepanets6855 Күн бұрын
The low light performance of 6700 is not better!
@Shanksbarber
@Shanksbarber Күн бұрын
thanks alot
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks Күн бұрын
@@Shanksbarber you are very welcome!
@1izia
@1izia Күн бұрын
it is not usable in latest firmware. feiyutech changed logic of gimbal control. It is not centered automatically. Support told me that it is new logic of control which differs from the management logic in gimbals other companies. I cannot use scorp 2 with new firmware. Cannot sell it. It turned into trash
@RealityHurts923
@RealityHurts923 2 күн бұрын
I changed from a Canon 5D MKII full frame to a Sony a6400 for the sake of my back and traveling but I missed full frame. Now with the a7cii, this gives me a way to stay with a small body but back to full frame. With this in mind, would this upgrade be worth it?
@canersjourney
@canersjourney 2 күн бұрын
I have both cameras: my brother's Sony a6700 and my own Sony a7 IV. My zoom lens (Tamron 28-75) is broken, so I'm currently using my brother's Tamron 17-70 lens. I'm planning a skiing vacation where I want to capture some action shots. Should I use the 17-70mm lens in crop mode on the a7 IV or mount it on the a6700? Which setup would produce better photos?
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks Күн бұрын
@@canersjourney I would take the A6700. First you will get to use all 26mpix vs 15 on A7IV. Second, the AF is better on A6700 (way more modern with the AI chip etc). And third, apsc lens is made for apsc cameras. The only advantage A7IV has is better low light performance.
@sinnerman2you
@sinnerman2you 3 күн бұрын
Why goodbuy i just bought it? I paired it with FE 1.8/50mm full frame lense, was that lense a mistake or not?
@SunCrushr
@SunCrushr 3 күн бұрын
Currently, (Dec 2024) the A7IV is going for $100 less than the A7CII. IMO, the A7CII is overpriced and should probably be only $300 more than the A6700, and the A6700 should be about $200 cheaper than it currently is. I'd also state that I have the original A7C, but I'm likely selling it and going back to APS-C. I haven't bought a lot of lenses for it due to the prices involved for what I want, and the lens size/weight on the APS-C lenses is just more attractive to me for what I need, which is portability. Your video sort of helped me organize my thoughts on this and helped me make up my mind. Subscribed.
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 3 күн бұрын
Hey SubCrushr, I am very happy to hear this video helped you make up your mind and thanks for the sub! I think the A7IV is currently so “attractive” price wise is because we are weeks away from A7V and Sony probably wants to get their sales up before new model comes out. In the meantime, I think A7CII’s sales are strong (no data to confirm), but probably thats the reason for not lowering the price. At the same time I feel like A6700 is very well priced. It’s incredible what you get for those 1200 or 1300$
@hazelnutlatte4776
@hazelnutlatte4776 3 күн бұрын
How to display leveling gauge on sony a6000?
@Leon-dt8uo
@Leon-dt8uo 4 күн бұрын
Nice video, really interesting thoughts, thanks for running such extensive tests! My budgets lower but considering the same move; currently have A6400 & can't stop thinking about trading up to original A7C or A7iii... Can't make my mind up, even after watching this video!
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 4 күн бұрын
@@Leon-dt8uo thanks Leon! Part of the journey is also making “lucky mistakes”. Who knows maybe against all rational - this is the right move for you
@Leon-dt8uo
@Leon-dt8uo 4 күн бұрын
@TomsJurjaks most pragmatic! True tho, I'll let impulse decide! The full frame itch just won't go away haha!
@SerkanBüyükçınar-v4n
@SerkanBüyükçınar-v4n 4 күн бұрын
👍
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 4 күн бұрын
@@SerkanBüyükçınar-v4n ✌️
@moussambodj9333
@moussambodj9333 5 күн бұрын
From SENEGAL 🇸🇳
@rogerrogers7393
@rogerrogers7393 5 күн бұрын
please keep using the Sony a6000 , I use a Sony a6000 as well
@jasoncaban7056
@jasoncaban7056 5 күн бұрын
I have the A7CR and cant travel with 2 prime and is perfect with the Crop capacity
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 5 күн бұрын
@@jasoncaban7056 definitely. The new high res sensors give a nice extra reach for all the primes 👌
@kittinplus4
@kittinplus4 6 күн бұрын
I thought there would be no change to using the Sony LUTs but boy oh boy does this look a LOT better as a base correction before diving in. How isn't this up front and center in Premiere???
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 6 күн бұрын
I guess they are slowly going in this direction. Now you can set the “Automatic Color Space Detection“ and Premiere will convert it right away.
@cdavey7654
@cdavey7654 9 күн бұрын
The 24-105 really needs updated at this point, it’s probably okay on lower megapixel bodies… Hope they make a new version that does well on a 61+ mp body, and it would be cool if they extended the range to 24-120 like Nikon (but only if they can do it without sacrificing image quality) - I’ll probably be buying the 24-70 GM II as well, even though it’s annoyingly expensive… OR I might just move over to medium format 100+ mp cameras/lenses if I am going to be dropping that much money anyway… 🙄
@ΓιώργοςΜπεκιάρης-ι7ρ
@ΓιώργοςΜπεκιάρης-ι7ρ 9 күн бұрын
🙏🙂 thanks so much 👍🙋
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 9 күн бұрын
@ΓιώργοςΜπεκιάρης-ι7ρ you are very welcome 🙏
@Kkp-s5c
@Kkp-s5c 10 күн бұрын
Cool
@fernandimperial
@fernandimperial 11 күн бұрын
How did you connect your phone as an external display?
@REXOOOR
@REXOOOR 11 күн бұрын
I bought 1 after watching this video.. the quality of this lens for the price is superb
@TwxyIsKrazy
@TwxyIsKrazy 11 күн бұрын
Fifine t863
@derbuntekanal
@derbuntekanal 12 күн бұрын
I just bought the a6000 used again 😊
@blahhdelmygmailcom
@blahhdelmygmailcom 12 күн бұрын
horrible stabilization. i dont like it
@alifstarfath
@alifstarfath 14 күн бұрын
thanks for sharing this! I get my setup now!
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 14 күн бұрын
Awesome! Good luck mate
@Sweetnuglyproductions
@Sweetnuglyproductions 14 күн бұрын
What I think is lacking is most people are going to buy these for commercial music videos or short film I would have love to see more shorts in the review because I’m looking to invest in 75mm and the 100mm to complete my line up I love that you made a short then just some one walking on shots of grass
@zyxyuv1650
@zyxyuv1650 15 күн бұрын
A company like Sirui should over-allocate resources to improving autofocus, and try to solve this FIRST before developing a lens lineup. They suffer from years of negative reputation and it takes a long time to work past that stigma..before people stop being afraid of the company's autofocus. I just asked a few photographers and videographers if they will consider a Sirui or TTArtisan or 7Artisan and they all said the same thing *"too afraid of the autofocus"*
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 15 күн бұрын
@@zyxyuv1650 thats exactly the feedback I gave to them directly mentioning how good sales Viltrox has on e.g. their 27 and 75mm f1.2 PRO models cuz they really stepped up their quality. No one will want to buy STM focus lenses in 2025 so they better improve soon!
@carloacetre677
@carloacetre677 15 күн бұрын
I use this for weddings mostly because it’s light and the 55mm focal length is something I’m comfortable with.
@Leo-w3b6y
@Leo-w3b6y 15 күн бұрын
This Meike lens looks great, especially with its metal build. It kind of reminds me of TTArtisan’s lenses-I’ve been using their 50mm f/1.2, and it’s such a fun lens for creative shots. Would love to see them release more Pro lenses like this!
@Andrew_travels_New_Zealand
@Andrew_travels_New_Zealand 15 күн бұрын
Thanks
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 14 күн бұрын
Cheers Andrew
@lordnilsson
@lordnilsson 16 күн бұрын
About the grass..!? Could it be, that you are on the lens' closest distance limit. And that a smaller (higher) aperture could decreas the limit in cm and therefore show a sharper photo when increase it from 1,8 to 4..???
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 16 күн бұрын
@@lordnilsson i get your point but I started wide open and made sure to focus (manually) with the screen magnified. So all of the shots should be in focus from wide open to f4 and beyond
@1010AllOne
@1010AllOne 16 күн бұрын
I tried the back button focus but I encounter one problem: my setting for reviewing the pics is to go to the point of focus (so I can see immediately if the focus was correct) but when using back button focus, that review/zoom point is it on the point where I did the back button focus but instead the centre of the frame. Sony a6700
@uciecaledokad
@uciecaledokad 16 күн бұрын
Hi, I come back to your videos from time to time and today I changed something in the settings in a6000 and when taking a single photo in AF-S mode the shutter makes 2 movements, previously there was one... any suggestion... it distracts me... I don't know why the shutter makes it like that... help ;)
@uciecaledokad
@uciecaledokad 16 күн бұрын
I already fixed it ;)
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 16 күн бұрын
@@uciecaledokad e-front shutter OFF? 😀
@uciecaledokad
@uciecaledokad 16 күн бұрын
@ exactly - best regards, great photos and equally helpful technical advice
@razzmatazz0077
@razzmatazz0077 16 күн бұрын
Hi, Tom, sorry I came bit late , But I found your explanation is the best one , My question is - would you reckon this lens to use with sony a5100 camera ? coz I rather like to upgrade lens than camera due to tight budgets, many thanks .
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 16 күн бұрын
@@razzmatazz0077 you definitely can! Or alternatively, check out the new lineup from Viltrox or Sirui or even Yongnuo. They’ve come a long way now
@razzmatazz0077
@razzmatazz0077 16 күн бұрын
@@TomsJurjaks many tx cheers
@vvlad78
@vvlad78 17 күн бұрын
Ok, A7C2 now cost 1950€ and A6700 cost 1450€. Thanks for advice, man, but 500€ doesn't worth to get crop instead of FF.
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 16 күн бұрын
@@vvlad78 fair point, go for FF if thats what you need. Just keep in mind that also FF lenses are about 30-50% more expensive and heavier/larger if that matter to you
@khalidabduljaleel
@khalidabduljaleel 2 күн бұрын
Yes, it does
@Princeton_James
@Princeton_James 17 күн бұрын
I'm a recent sub. I enjoy your content and delivery. Thanks.
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 17 күн бұрын
@@Princeton_James thanks so much! I appreciate your support ✌️
@arbolifestyle
@arbolifestyle 17 күн бұрын
Great video! Thanks for the comparison!
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 17 күн бұрын
@@arbolifestyle cheers my friend!
@MeAMuse
@MeAMuse 17 күн бұрын
24-105 was my first ever zoom lens. I think what most people don’t realize they are missing with a 24-70 is the 85mm FL… 70mm I don’t feel is tele enough to get great compression for portraits. 24-70 F2.8 is my most used standard zoom today but I just feel like it has no soul. The one I am waiting for is the 24-200 F2.8-F4 G that has been rumored - but I don’t do video… if I did I would be tempted by the 20-70mm F4
@tubecycler
@tubecycler 17 күн бұрын
I sold it a while ago and never looked back. There was nothing wrong with it. It was just so mediocre and not exciting.
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 17 күн бұрын
Right? I kinda feel the same way about it.
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 17 күн бұрын
Right? I kinda feel the same way about it.
@hyonkwon9322
@hyonkwon9322 17 күн бұрын
Just an ad…
@Zimmermann310
@Zimmermann310 17 күн бұрын
I have this lens with a few of other very good and top of the range lenses. But this one is a mega surprise for this money.👍👍👍
@1010AllOne
@1010AllOne 17 күн бұрын
Can you provide th link to the focus setting video please?
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 17 күн бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/fpyniGaorbhpZ8k
@1010AllOne
@1010AllOne 17 күн бұрын
Hi, thanks of the great video! But I don't understand the benefit of the back button focusing. You say that as long as you hold the AF button it will focus...so what's the difference with that and half press on the shutter button? I must not be understanding some important difference 🙂
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 17 күн бұрын
@@1010AllOne thanks! The difference is that with back button focus I can focus on a subject with back button focus, release it, then reframe the shot (focus is still on the subject) and then I can fire away my shots and focus won’t change. Now, if I would have my focus on shutter, it would refocus every time I want to take a photo unless I switch to manual focus. With Back Button focus I don’t need to do it
@1010AllOne
@1010AllOne 17 күн бұрын
@@TomsJurjaks thank you. Forgive me for going deeper, but, if the focus is so fast on the camera then what difference does it make if the camera refocuses? Sorry, I’m really trying to properly understand that function.
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 17 күн бұрын
@ no worries, im here to help 🙂 its not about the speed but rather accuracy. Imagine you are doing a street photography. You see an old gentleman sitting on a bench reading newspaper on a busy street. Lots of people walk buy, cars drive in front (you are taking a photo across the street). Now you have focus on your subject while he was in the middle of the frame, but you want to use rule of thirds and want him on a side. If you would not have back button focus - most likely camera would refocus on totally different subject (usually in the middle of the frame or to whats closer to you). So not about the speed but what you want. With Back Button - I can just take photos without refocusing. There are more examples why I prefer it but its not for everyone. Some prefer focus with shutter 🙂
@1010AllOne
@1010AllOne 17 күн бұрын
@@TomsJurjaks okay I get what you’re saying. So when I am in the same situation that you described, I half press and my focus locks on the the gentlemen with the newspaper and because I have it on tracking, it stays on him while I reframe. Is that the same thing then?
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 17 күн бұрын
@ yes, and then you can usually take just one photo because as soon as you release the shutter, it will refocus (unless you have mad skills to keep it half pressed) while with back button focus you can just snap photos, take a pause, reframe, take more photos etc
@MultiThunder1234
@MultiThunder1234 18 күн бұрын
It's not easy to balance this gimbal because the sliding plates take a lot of force to move so if you're a person with multiple configurations in body and lens, go get another gimbal that's easier to balance
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 18 күн бұрын
@@MultiThunder1234 that is true. The only gimbal I know that has ceramic coating for easier sliding is the new DJI RS4
@BehindTheNeedle
@BehindTheNeedle 18 күн бұрын
I love the 24-105! I do mainly run and gun video. This lens is the perfect partner for my FX3!
@edmirakapllanaj3129
@edmirakapllanaj3129 18 күн бұрын
I can’t get this quality of pictures with my a6000 camera 📷, how do you do that?
@kingghidorah8106
@kingghidorah8106 18 күн бұрын
I'm a hobbyist and i was thinking on ditching my 7 Minolta lenses for a 24-70, a 70-200 and a 200-600 (g Master line) but after testing so many lenses I've decided to stick with Sigma. Nowadays they're basically Black G Master II lenses, I dislike Sony's 30% extra money you have to pay because of the brand's ambassador and influencer campaigns. The A1 II was the last nail in the coffin for me. It's a rancid cult. Got me a Sigma 70-200 DG DN OS and I found zero complaints about it. It seems to be a fresh batch because it's parfocal, has no yellow tint and has no OSS trepidation, such were the complaints about sponsor reviewers. I had so much fun with the Minolta 80-200 G HS APO on A77II but Sony did a duck move with the adapters. You won't get quick autofocus with PDAF on adapters if you use anything that is not a Sony G SSM lens.
@adamadamis
@adamadamis 18 күн бұрын
Sigma, Tamron, Viltrox etc don't need to advertise too much, their products can be lower price, and this is enough advertising. The main brands, however, need to advertise as it's a battle for the system. SONY, Canon etc also spend lots of money on R&D for the cameras, and these cost a lot. Prices for lenses and cameras don't usually reflect actual value; they need to sell the basic cameras at a lower price than they want to attract people to the system, so conversely, the premium products are sold at a higher price to get the balance. Big companies need to advertise, pay salaries to thousands, they have lots of offices, lots of rent and other costs, PR etc.
@jhirse3547
@jhirse3547 17 күн бұрын
I'll continue, of course, buying Sony bodies, but no more of their lenses. I like Sigma way more because of their quality lenses, continuous support towards us APS-C shooters, and their public relations in which they actually convey their approach, opposite to Sony who's just an anonymous corporate giant.
@adamadamis
@adamadamis 17 күн бұрын
@jhirse3547 Sigma are great, but for me, SONY lenses are even better. They have great APS-C options, too. I have the SONY 11mm 1.8, but I also have the Sigma 18-50mm 2.8 (SONY's 16-55 2.8 is superb also). SONY is an umbrella company, with many divisions, and for cameras, they have the DNA from Konica and MINOLTA, which have always been great innovators.
@Apextwins
@Apextwins 18 күн бұрын
I must say I really like 24-105 mainly because it let's you to understand what range you like mainly to work in as beginner photographer/videographer. Absoulute best as travel lens - gives so many options. While extension of barrel can be annoying at times of filming on gimbal and in some other scenarios, I think that sharpness makes up for it. One of the absolute best lenses to start Sony full frame journey with. What it helped me to understand is that I want 135mm prime for evening street photography (already have 55mm 1.8 zeiss which I love) as I really work in extended range most of the time on that 24-105. I'm thinking on moving towards Sony 2.8 70-200 or Tamron 35-150 2, 2.8 - I wonder which one is better there. Kind of feels like Tamron is mostly for photography no?
@nicchemarodriguez
@nicchemarodriguez 19 күн бұрын
Hi, In Amazon I see that for the pro version you have a 27.6L and a 31.1L version, which size were you showing in the video, I am considering it but not sure if 31.1L would be too big. Thanks in advance.
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 18 күн бұрын
I think they got it wrong on Amazon. The internal space should be almost identical. The difference however is that the 31l version (which I have in this video) is a “pro” version meaning you have more space for your gear, less for your clothes etc on top. The 27l is a non pro version, as I said, probably the same size but more space for clothes on top but fits less gear.
@TVe200
@TVe200 19 күн бұрын
I sold my 24-105 a year ago and bought the 20-70 f4 G. 20 was more important than 105 since I have a 70-200 also. And the 20-70 have aperture ring, is smaller and sharper.
@markofadljevic1975
@markofadljevic1975 19 күн бұрын
Think about Tamron g2 duo, 28-75 and 70-180
@TomsJurjaks
@TomsJurjaks 19 күн бұрын
@@markofadljevic1975 I was considering that (or Sigma), but realized, I don’t want to get a 24mm prime so I think 28mm will not be wide enough