I'm so glad! Please share the videos to help others learn!

Noted! I will lower the volume in future ones!

You are welcome! Thank you for the kind words!

kzbin.info/www/bejne/mpLZk6Nre7Zln80si=DfL8s-tc1UDPNnDM did a video on it. Only change is the last 2 minute UF is now a throw in foul, more in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z5jKdalmYpV7fLcsi=hruehThm5m4NpFUA . Hope that helps :)

Thank you!!

Thank you! I wish I had an easier way of sharing it for more to have access to it

I would love to do that, how would I go about doing it properly??

I'm sorry but I couldn't help you. You should hear from a technician.

Thank you! I will!

Thank you! Just wish the video was shared more so that it reaches a larger audience of visual learners!

Nope, Free Throw Shooter has 5 seconds to attempt the free throw when it’s at their disposal

Veré qué puedo hacer

Yes, since screening requires more clips and explanation I planned on making a video on it. I did take a 1 year break and just recently came back after multiple messages about it. I will add it to the list (2 videos already made and ready to post, I have 2 more being finished slowly then I will do screening). For your scenario, the only player causing illegal contact is the defender. If the official feels that the defense attempting to get through the screen is A) enough contact to warrant a foul and B) would not want to allow that contact in case it leads to rough play or tough game management by allowing that contact, then they would probably call a foul on the defender. If we do not call a defensive foul, chances are the officials would not call a illegal screen on the reposition you mentioned because the defense caused them to do a slight reposition. It all depends on the league/level of play. I have seen screens that were deemed legal at the olympics/international level but not legal for university play in some countries. Hope that helps!

@@refereeuniversity Love your work. You break everything down into simple explanations that seem so logical, like "why couldn't a referee see that." I suppose it's a bit different under the pressure of a fast moving game, but then again they are the ones we look to for guidance on whats right or wrong in the game. Hope you are well

@@Gaze-v1r Thank you, I will do my best to stay on top of adding content :)

Great question, I haven’t found anything currently on it (maybe it will be in the new OBRI to accommodate this new text in the rules). I would imagine it would be the officials judgement to use tools at their disposal. A timeout is reserved for smaller infractions of a delay, I imagine in this case since a DQ is more severe, they would look at delay of game technicals or potential OBR 20.1 actions prevent the game from being played that could have the team forfeit.

@@refereeuniversity Bro I think I found this Rule: Article: 19 19.3.6 Substitutions shall be completed as quickly as possible. A player who has committed 5 fouls or has been disqualified must be substituted immediately (taking no more than 30 seconds). If there is a delay of the game, a time-out may be charged against the offending team. If the team has no time-out remaining, a technical foul for delaying the game may be charged against the head coach, entered as a 'B'.

@@mindaugasbalsys8301 love it! Thank you!

Sir i hav a question-Is there any 10 second rule is implemented in new version of FIBA rule? Specifically when 1,2,3 free throws are awarded to any player.

@@mukundsinghnegi8373 If I understand correctly. The shooter is delay of the Free throw ,the Lead referee puts the ball on the line , the Trail referee counting 5 sec for the delay the free throw ,if its violiation B team gets the ball from the Sideline. If the player A is bouncing the ball and delay the game its the same, Trail counting 5 sec if this violiation B team gets the ball from the Sideline. Article: 14 14-2 from Interpratation And rule: 43.2.3

Thank you! Means a lot! We have a lot of other videos planned to create but it takes time, happy I can help!

@@refereeuniversity thank you again! I am gonna steal your method to teach my fellow officials in my country(Mauritania)

@@oumarsy3485 Thank you for sharing the video! It means a lot! Happy I can help support!

Thank you! It means a lot!!

Same here. Using this video as my main source of information.

I have had some talks with FIBA about their terminology but unfortunately, nothing transpired from it

Spotlights by Niwel, details in the videos information :)

i totally agree - i think these sort of flops are hilarious

I really Appreciate you! Rules become easier when you explain them. KUDOS!

This one is a tricky one but it’s a correct charge. Reason being is that his right foot is not in the no charge semi circle area (because it’s outside the semi circle area) and his left foot is out side in front of it. If the no charge line extended to the endline, then it would be a no call :) thanks for the support!!

You're Welcome!!

@@refereeuniversity I wonder if (when this becomes more common knowledge) every player holding the ball quickly now tries a shot when an off ball foul is called.... (like most of them do when being fouled themselves)...

@@petermuller7079 Possible, but very difficult to do since they need to be in their act of shooting prior or during the occurrence of the foul.

@@refereeuniversity Sure - but even though chances are slim, at the moment every player takes a shot when a foul on him is called.... Players do a lot of things that have only very little chances of success (throwing their heads back in contact, shouting 'and one', signalling travels, ...). We will see.

They could do a HCC. Maybe the coach used their HCC already, maybe it was very close that they did not want to use it on that play and have it saved for later? I am not sure why the coach did not, those are just some of the reasons why he might not want to.

@@refereeuniversity it was a very interesting play. I had something somewhat similar happen,where a shooter was ran down after the release. But since the shooter already ended his shot (landed/never jumped), it was score plus possession (or 2ft if it was a bonus)

What rule are you talking of? FIBA didn't do much, just some clearifying

I plan to have the new rule changes on october 1st when they are solidifed and used. I plan to be in the webinar to confirm my interpretations match what is described by FIBA prior to making the video :) Thanks for the support! For correctable errors, that might be later. I was waiting for the rule rewrite!

@@refereeuniversity huh. Didn't know there was a webinar. Pity I can't attend. I'm assuming it'll be talked about in our referees college next week

@@cptfwiffo Sometimes they are open to the public but they need to do a better job of sharing that knowledge :/

Not true

It was ok for the player to lose the ball but you see that the player lets the ball come to rest in his hand by having it under the ball then dribbles it again. (24.1.2)

You can’t do a layup without lifting your pivot foot

@@refereeuniversity A layup is different from a step through. No wonder you regard an illegal step through as legal.

@@rogerhuang9760 Executing a layup has the same movement and step allocation as a step through. There is no extra step, there is no illegal step when doing the move. I know people struggle on understanding that, that is why we give multiple different ways of explaining it to help those still struggling.

@@refereeuniversity Neither Jordan nor Kobe ever did this kind of move. If some of the illegal step-through in your film are legal, then Olajuwon should be scoring more than 50 points per game.