2014 Ford fusion 2.0L Ecoboost 0-60 time with StopWatch

[@brandondannys-menary3678]

These cars are a lot of fun to drive, great daily drivers. Imo they’re pretty decent sleepers and looks very nice

[@mrbigbigtoe]

The reason why your turbo cars aren’t getting these results is because some of y’all are cheapskates and don’t use 93 octane. Don’t blame the car when you’re the dummy.

[@tank0130]

Charlie gas has nothing to do with horsepower, or how fast your car goes. myth that’s already been busted

[@titanfilmworks4101]

@@tank0130 that's actually not true. If the vehicle is designed to operate at peak performance with a specific grade of fuel, then putting in a lesser grade will cause the computer to compensate and change things around. If your car is designed for 87 and you run 93, you're correct in that it wont do anything to increase hp or make it run better. The octane has to do with burn rate and what not. If you put 87 in a car designed to run 93, optimal performance will not be achieved.

[@tank0130]

Titan Filmworks yes, but usually cars that use higher octane gas aren’t your average car, like a camry or optima or something, usually that would be for sports cars. you are right, though.

[@titanfilmworks4101]

@@tank0130 you are correct in that MOST commuter vehicles use regular grade. So running 87 or whatever regular is in your area, would get you the peak hp. Running 93 in a commuter will do nothing for performance or MPG gain.

[@Deadpoolmasterchief]

Not everyone has access to 93 ooctane Dummy and it’s how u drive not straight Line performance SKILL !

[@thatruth6488]

Mine did again 5.6 seconds on my 2.0 Turbo stock 2016 fusion titanium That was with 93 premium gas which gives you 240 horsepower and on 87 gas is 231 hp You also get more torque on 93 octane

[@buzzj00]

Well this is why I use shell v power and I never go to arco maybe someday people will understand when my fusion accelerates quicker than theirs

[@1FastGXP]

Pretty impressive considering car & drive could only muster 7.3 seconds in the awd 2014 ecoboost model.

[@CarAccelerationChannel]

I wouldn't believe everything i read but i personally tested a 2018 2.0T awd with 18k miles on the clock and got a 7.8sc. A Focust ST get 6.1-6.2. No way a heavier, less powerful car would get it done faster. Plus if you look, and listen closely to the video it feels slightly accelerated. The engine note sounds off in comparison to the one i tested.

[@MrXGameR14]

1Fast GXP btw the awd is heavier ik it's more grip but the fwd already has most of the weight on it so there is not a big difference between it and the awd

[@justinluttrell1769]

Unless one absolutely needs AWD, it's such a waste of fuel and and boat anchor when it comes to performance.

[@justabrokeredneck]

Justin Luttrell making me regret my awd. and i’m picking it up in the morning :(

[@Michael-hz2pl]

Steven Freeman AWD is nice because you always tear off of the line faster than a 2wd car

[@AmericasNextTopShooterA.N.T.S]

I love seeing a fusion get it🥶🏎💨 we be going off #FUSIONARMY

[@AmericasNextTopShooterA.N.T.S]

@Cookie Monster what you do to yours? Lol I’d love to see a Honda accord beat my fusion🤣 your clearly not a car guy nor a mechanic 💯

[@sanjefff]

@@AmericasNextTopShooterA.N.T.Swhat mods do you have done to yours and where should I go look to get them? I am new to modding and want to see what my fusion can offer

[@alexlindsey6446]

you did this test NOT in sport mode, correct? The "S" to the right of "D" on your display would have been amber color if you were. I have a Fusion that's why I ask. Thanks

[@kt249]

sport mode has almost literally zero difference

[@justinluttrell1769]

I'm really skeptical. It's only 240hp and the car weighs like 3,800#. Even with the ecoboost having more torque than the older 3.5L, this seems really fishy. Considering the 2017 Fusion Sport has 325hp and 380lbft and "only" manages 5.3 seconds on an instrumented track in optimal conditions.

[@CloudNineKing]

You'd believe it if it was a Japanese or German car though huh

[@justinluttrell1769]

@@CloudNineKing Calm down, I'm not a Japanese fanboy. I just know how physics work.

[@CloudNineKing]

@@justinluttrell1769 lol

[@AmericasNextTopShooterA.N.T.S]

@@CloudNineKing Not really considering they are going for fuel efficiency and performance! And the car does not weight 3800lbs. It’s like 3430. Only way to change that is with throttle adjustment and adding power and shedding weight. Gear to weight ratio. So not fishy at all with the right torque off throttle and hp gains with tuning and adjustments and let the car basically know screw gas mileage lol 🤷🏾‍♂️ car performance and laws of physics.

[@AustinDashes]

Nice fusion boss! I wanna get a 2015 2.0 Ecoboost for my turo rental car fleet. I daily a 2013 ford fusion hybrid and freaking love the power and fuel economy and that's saying something because I've owned about 8 cars or more with 3-450 horsepower.

[@abshot3487]

I have the fusion eco boost 2013 too but I want to make it faster just don’t know how

[@AustinDashes]

@@abshot3487 have you tuned it? That's a good place to start. If you want serious power, probably get a bigger turbo and beef up the intercooler. It's not a bad engine. My Lincoln MKC with the 2.0 Ecoboost was peppy. But it needs more power like the 2.3 or 2.7 Ecoboost

[@abshot3487]

@@AustinDashes the only thing I’m missing is catalytic converter because it marks on scanner but that also could be my sensor messed up because it marks tire pressure even tho it’s perfectly fine

[@abshot3487]

@@AustinDashes my bad for asking dumb questions it’s my first car but is getting a better turbo expensive or what could be a good improvement for speed but for a good price

[@AustinDashes]

@@abshot3487 maybe start out simple with a throttle spacer, a good tune, and an exhaust. All of that would be $700 maybe. The tune alone would improve your 0-60 to closer to 6 seconds which feels good in a car! I owned a Lincoln mkz which is the luxury version of a fusion and had the 3.7 V6 which is the more powerful engine option than the 2.0 turbo. If you got a tune you'd be making power like that. Maybe a bit quicker.

[@larsfrerichs7174]

If these numbers were true stock I’d buy one in a heartbeat. But besides this video I’ve seen most run 8’s.

[@5dwolf22]

My cars complete stock. Most videos I see on youtube are 6 second 0 to 60. But Those cars don't have the amount of miles mine has.

[@akita989]

I mean mines stock 2016 and I can run 6s but I only have 30k miles on mine idk how you're getting high 5s. My Buick verano t is lighter and little more power and can't even get it below 6 secs. Haha nice video

[@5dwolf22]

I think 73k miles helps it break in more. I drove my friends 2016 I cant say anything about its speed difference because I didn't floor it but I can say that they dont feel the same. To me they felt like different cars.

[@thatruth6488]

It the driver and right conditions morons

[@austinloadholt631]

To settle this. The reason why your seeing 8 seconds is because it’s probably the 1.6 ecoboost or the 2.5 duratec. They are slower. My mom has a 2.5 it feels faster than it is, but still. And yeah most 2.0 turbos take about 6 seconds unless like he said he but 93 octane in and it may have been on a small downhill incline.

[@gto_0656]

Fast like my camry v6 2010

[@vincemartinflying]

Is this car tuned or something?

[@EndlesSuffering]

My 2014 Camry SE 4 cyl does it in 6-7 seconds, now the V6 does it in like 5.5-5.8 but it’s just harder to do basic maintenance due to how the V is facing front and back instead of left to right.

[@DarioAE01]

No stock 2.5 Camry doing 60mph under 7 seconds and that's a fact

[@buzzj00]

Yeah I do not believe that either and I'm not sure the new v6 Camry is all that fast either

[@michaelp8053]

Interesting. I timed one over and over again and it would not go under 8 secs

[@AustinDashes]

Hahaha the four cylinder Camry does NOT do it in under 7 seconds. Some asshat in a newer four cylinder Camry was antagonizing me on the road and I drive a 2013 ford fusion hybrid. I'm like ok clown, how do you like taillights? I dusted that mofo and it was EASY. Four cylinder camrys are slow. Let him do the ricer flyby too LMFAO

[@sloppyjoe77]

THATS HOW FAST MY 2013 SE ford fushion is I be beating this bmws and nicer cars sometimes and having them look at me like wtf just happened I just got beat by a ford fushion I’m just impressed by it and ford takes care of it even tho they forgot to put the fucking dipstick in my car one time I can forgive they did good on my car

[@EndlesSuffering]

Just as fast as a V6 Camry

[@alvinlong5930]

nice

[@thatruth6488]

Mine is completely stock and I timed mine 0 to 60 5.1 seconds when it was 30 degrees out early this year it just recently 5.6 seconds

[@robbiehernandez8019]

Hard to believe that. New Fusion Sport get's 4.9s-5.1s with 80 more horsepower.

[@sloppyjoe77]

5.8-6 seconds on my 2013 ford fushion different roads all the same results and on shitty tires that need to be replaced too don’t underestimate the power of the fushion Lol

[@AustinDashes]

I could believe a sub 6 second time for sure. I owned a 2009 VW Passat 2.0t and got 6.5 seconds to 60. The fusion has a lot more HP and torque too. And ford just rules

[@kgd1163]

This proves that an automathic ford can fuck a civic 😂😂😂

[@linyneen8731]

Why the USA version is that fast?!? My 2015 Mondeo ecoboost240 ,as same as your car,the engine transmission engine software are all the same,but mine can get only 7.4 ,why~~~~~

[@dillonh321]

What octane of gas do you use?

[@ivanfedyshyn7211]

So you show us fusion sport.........

[@mrbigbigtoe]

This is audibly not the Fusion Sport. The Fusion Sport will never spin its wheels like this due to it being AWD. This is simply the 2.0T running with premium fuel. There is a video somewhere on here of a 2.0T with a 93 octane computer mod vs a stock 2017 Fusion Sport. The 2.0 stayed in front of the Sport the entire race with ease and both cars were AWD This one being FWD is lighter than the AWD by well over 100-200 pounds which plays a pretty good factor in acceleration times after 40+ speeds Some AWD cars can rocket off of the line, but they have more power loss and they ultimately don’t gain speed as fast as a 2-wheel drive variant, which is why this IS the FWD 2.0T Fusion SE running 93 octane😋🚬💯🖤

[@J30A4V6er]

@@mrbigbigtoe There is no such video. There was a AWD Titanium 2.0t with tune and bolt-ons that ran a 14.0@95 which was the quickest one I have seen. Fusion sports are running 13.5-13.7 stock at 99-100mph all day long with the right driver. A 93 Octane tune 2.0T isn't touching a stock Fusion sport in acceleration from any speed.

[@samliang4146]

​2.0t version only comes with awd​@@mrbigbigtoe

[@zoom_shields]

Where did you get the gauge cluster

[@isaiaheckert4429]

It's stock for the S and the SE unless you get the luxury package or a Titanium

[@h1tman-640]

Looks like your stopwatch stopped counting around 55mph.

[@Limited-uq2yk]

Nope

[@lynnjohnson2482]

4pots today definitely have some zip to them, far cry from the ones from 30 40 years ago.

[@ReidHenderson]

Yeah tell me about it. I have an over 300hp daily cruiser and my beater is a 1990 ranger with a brutal 2.3 sohc. Poor thing is reliable as hell but don't ever get in any kind of hurray with 30 inch tires highway rear end ratio and 100hp maybe!?

[@canddmeyer]

Downhill runs? Modded? Faster in S mode?

[@5dwolf22]

zip89105 it's not downhill, it's also stock, and the second run was in sport

[@canddmeyer]

You got yourself a keeper. I follow Fusion forums and no one runs in the fives unless modded. My 2016 SE 2.0T FWD is plenty quick, but no way is mine in the fives, unlike some Hemi Chargers I've driven. Maybe after broken in I might pick up a few tenths. Nice run!

[@5dwolf22]

I was very surprised that it can go in fives, but I think living only 30 feet above sea level helps a lot.

[@justinlaturnus4014]

what does yours run?

[@AD-sp5cv]

zip89105 yes this was downhill run

[@ЕвгенийЕвгений-о4э]

Is it PowerShift transmission?

[@kelvinchannel9592]

Yep

[@5.7_TY]

No it’s a conventional 6 speed not the powershift dual clutch

[@randellgribben9772]

i have a 2014 2.0 i knew it was quick,, but not this quick

[@CarAccelerationChannel]

This video looks accelerated. And there is NO WAY a 2.0T fwd fusion does the 0-60 faster than a lighter, more powerful and performance oriented Focus ST. And i just tested a 2018 fusion 2.0T awd titanium model and got 7.8sc... kzbin.info/www/bejne/iWfXpXhja7iDb6M. Even your engine note sounds accelerated compared to the one from my video.

[@kalel33]

Depends on where you live and the temperature makes a difference. In Colorado, mine is much slower than this, especially since we only have 91 octane, but I get into Kansas with 93 octane and the it's this fast because of the altitude difference, is usually warmer, and the higher octane. The Focus has one major flaw, FWD only. It loses some traction out the gate.

[@denisbeslimov2279]

The video is accelerated to x1.25... Change the speed to 0.75 and the video becomes realistic. Very disappointed.

[@5dwolf22]

Denis Beslimov its not. I literally recorded went on iMovie and slapped a timer on it. Listen to the second run and my foot hitting the pedal and wheel s screeching, 0.75 speed doesn’t makes sense.

[@denisbeslimov2279]

@@5dwolf22 Line-up bro, stop posting false videos, a 2.0 ecobost cannot do that. I'm talking from experience, mine is tuned with bolt-ons barely reaches your numbers. Make another video you to prove you are not a scam.

[@5dwolf22]

Denis Beslimov U live on sea level, that makes a huge difference.

[@adolfo98063]

Denis Beslimov lol

[@luucid5734]

Yeah also the engine sounds higher pitched than my fusion so I think it’s sped up

[@rebelliondoor]

Probably going down a hill 😂😂😂

[@jvelazque005]

They are pretty fast bro and fun to drive

[@SuperSix4]

That isn’t bad at all

[@marioelburro1492]

Faster than a miata at lewst

[@YungJackie22]

Namo Loke faster than a new edge mustang 😐

[@egscomp8074]

You’ve got to give the car time to warm up and get the the tires warm especially fwd. The fwd models are quicker as well. Make sure your engine air filter is clean and that the rest of your maintenance is good.These numbers can be achieved stock 0-60 if you do everything I said and also use 93 of course. The car sounds more aggressive and is definitely faster on premium. Oh also trac off and in sport🫡 Oh yea one more thing 😂get an intercooler the stock ones don’t keep the boost temps low enough so you lose hp and tq after a few pulls. The temperature outside helps alot if it’s colder too and again make sure tires are warm😃

[@ueg-zm8wf]

try e85 and u will see 4.9 with good driver

[@ueg-zm8wf]

its auto...............good driver not necessary!!!!!

[@phillyspitta8147]

@@ueg-zm8wf send me a video of that launch my homie got a titanium and I cooked em with a 99 es300 fairly stock

[@roganjohanning4336]

@@phillyspitta8147 by the time you hit 45 (the end of first gear) a fusion would be at 75, and then at the end of 2nd (80mph) the fusion’s in 5th at 120… I would know since I’ve owned both

[@phillyspitta8147]

@@roganjohanning4336 it got stolen shortly after I posted that comment 🤦‍♂️😭 yo I was hurt as shit cause when I said fairly I had a rare trd charger on it I bought from a dude in Hawaii took a while to get it installed then I got a solara stick in it and it was quick as shit went on vac came home gone , found few weeks later striped n burned down . Got a 05 es330 now wit 70k .not fast but smooth

[@thatruth6488]

I got my titanium 0 to 60 in 5.9 and that was not downhill I I have the 2016 model

[@Beautifulgreen740]

Black Wraith was urs v6

[@MrXGameR14]

TRack Monstah the v6 is on the 2017 not the 2014

[@diegoalbertoarellanozepeda8227]

I have the titanium plus , and i did 6.7 sec

[@Saeed47trades]

Launch control

[@ohheyitsdezz3609]

Y’all think your fast because you have a 2004 Honda Civic but really even Honda Civic I see has loads of stuff done to the engine

[@mustangdbest220]

SPORT MODE IS BETTER

[@5.7_TY]

Stopped the timer too early. Car and driver best time is a little more than 6 seconds

[@questlessheroes6716]

your full of it

[@sloppyjoe77]

I took my car to the track and differ road conditions had someone time me inside car and outside and I got around 5.8-6.45 and my tires are shit on it needs new ones I came back to this video just to comment on your comment I just did a science experiment I’ve beaten cars that I shouldn’t have in my 2013 ford fushion it has good parts and I know how to drive

[@issaalsaloum8431]

my 2020 2.0T got 0-60 in 5.4 secs its completely stock

[@ueg-zm8wf]

downhill?

[@issaalsaloum8431]

ueg1974 no

[@issaalsaloum8431]

ueg1974 but i have the exhaust changed

[@mattortwein9932]

Not a chance.

[@loganknupp9034]

obviously sped up

[@jkink8049]

Definetley is not right

[@308Doctor]

7s

[@ivanfedyshyn7211]

So you show us fusion sport.........

[@webhito]

Hardly, a v6 sport has a totally different engine sound. kzbin.info/www/bejne/lWfZnIKGaJxqjas

[@haroldbeauchamp3770]

Ivan Fedyshyn nope. Sport is awd. Couldn’t spin the tires if you wanted to.

[@kalel33]

@@haroldbeauchamp3770 I spin the tires on my 2.0 and it's AWD. I do have to turn off traction control.,