2024 Ford Ranger Love & Hate

( www.TFLtruck.com ) All-new 2024 Ford Ranger goes on sale!
#ford #ranger #truck

[@2H2521]

Desperately needs other cab & bed size options along with a center console delete & column shifter. The interior is a major improvement though.

[@user-ue2ut8sw5s]

No. Don't need a long bed. Crew cab is nice. I love the center console. If you want a bare bones truck go buy used. Or buy a k truck. It's not hard.

[@legendary6790]

@@user-ue2ut8sw5stell me you don’t use a truck for work without telling me you don’t use a truck for work

[@outsidewithmrt]

@@user-ue2ut8sw5s you’re the reason trucks are so overpriced and full of useless crap

[@brad4527]

​@user-ue2ut8sw5s A 6ft is more useful, the short cab is for families and I agree there should be a bed option and a real shitter like they had previously witch was pretty awesome. The Frontier had an awesome shitter!

[@isaiahlangfords5574]

Also the price is stupid high for no reason beyong liberalauto unions asking for 40$ an hour and 30 hour workweeks

[@Fordfan08]

Ford, let's put the bed step on our midsize truck, but not our full size f150, great video guys

[@scurjaldan5349]

Would rather have a pop down since I hate the look of those steps

[@johnpeters9793]

Only 300 pounds?? I guess Nathan can't use it...

[@christopherwoodyatt38]

GM started doing this in I believe either 2013 or 2014 literally all pick up trucks should have built-in steps incorporated into the bumpers. I use mine all the time on my 2020 Silverado and it's such an awesome feature.

[@Fordfan08]

@christopherwoodyatt38 my grandfather is 78 years old, he's got a 2015 silverado, that's the only way he's able to get in the bed.

[@James.0304]

Super Dutys have then also, while leave there most popular model without them

[@josephmcclary9667]

It’s funny you complain about the base model not having adaptive cruise control when your truck doesn’t even have cruise control. 😂😂😂

[@RidersInBlack]

I'll bet you the front differential won't break on a patch of snow either 😅

[@thekingofnoobs8362]

​@RidersInBlack it's a ford everything breaks

[@RidersInBlack]

@thekingofnoobs8362 everything breaks on everything. Ford is no better or worse than anyone. Like Toyota. Tacos break prematurely too. Look at TFL's debacle. A Canyon had to tow it out....

[@The-fs5wn]

@@RidersInBlackand the Colorado he had, which is mechanically identical to the Canyon, broke too!

[@RidersInBlack]

@@The-fs5wn Everything is shit!!

[@MrJwh3000]

The transfer case won't snap on 4w hi on ice is what I like.

[@jackyetis4683]

Just like their Toyota Tacoma or whatever that was that snapped

[@PlayWaves1]

At least it has cruise control Roman 😊.

[@Elnegro..]

My 2002 ranger has that, and it looks better.

[@RidersInBlack]

​@@Elnegro..Best Rangers and best small trucks ever made

[@phonemeunit1973]

...and a back up camera. Too bad his Colorado doesn't have that lol

[@wilmarbarrick3194]

Adaptive Cruise control?? Dang Andre, getting a little uppity coming from NO cruise control at all, ain't ya?

[@0223Jeremy]

Right? Its not a safety feature if you pay attention lol

[@carriewerner4463]

But the cruise works better than your Colorado!!!

[@Dusdaddy]

That's why it's a miss to him. If it was in all models of Chevy, he wouldn't have been the butt of one of the longest running jokes on YT!!

[@Stackali]

why would a base model get adaptive cruise control? thats a luxury feature that nobody truly needs. you know what is adaptive? your eyes, the things you are supposed to be using while driving.

[@Dusdaddy]

Because Toyota is putting it in everything.

[@devinbender8428]

@@Dusdaddybut there are other features not on the standard toyota. Every company cuts something out to make the higher one seam better

[@Dusdaddy]

@@devinbender8428 You don't get it. I said that to point out why it's on Andre's dislike list. Once something becomes common place, it becomes a necessity, therefore a "hit" if it's not there. Ford doesn't offer anything that Toyota and GM don't also offer except the little towing steering knob.

[@plmn93]

I hated adaptive cruise on a Pacifica because it struggled to tell the difference between vehicles in different lanes. But on a Traverse I found it worked great. Very intuitive and seamless. I'm sold on it now.

[@tomgroth2898]

Any mention on cruise control and Andre gets roasted. That’s gotta sting. I bet that never happens again. Great video.

[@bret9741]

Add 1’ to bed, drop price $10k.

[@erics8696]

High priced? I priced out a fairly loaded XLT and it was about $7000 less than a TRD Sport and I could get a locking rear diff.

[@tubbers20]

Staying with my '84 with a 7 foot bed and 4 speed. Just registered it as a collector's vehicle.

[@tedlulis973]

😂 At least the front differential isn't made out of Glass like the toyotas No wonder it is outselling them

[@lukestoyz]

How many have broken up till this point? One?

[@tedlulis973]

@@lukestoyz I only know of 7 I'm sure there are plenty more

[@kaseyc5078]

Outselling them? Perhaps because Toyota can’t produce enough high volume yet. Taco will kill this thing in sales

[@tedlulis973]

@@kaseyc5078 Toyota always limits production to give a false sense of rarity...Its well-known

[@BurchellAtTheWharf]

2door and 8 foot bed needa make a comeback

[@ALMX5DP]

Pretty good payload figure for a midsize

[@breakeralex9211]

A lot better then my PowerWagon @1200 lbs ☠️

[@marshallwilliams6405]

I think has to do a lot with the Australian market, where these trucks are popular. They want high payload cause they can't really get any bigger trucks than this. I think rangers over there can have 2000 pounds or more.

[@julianvizio2190]

@@marshallwilliams6405In Argentina we have them with 2400pounds of payload. Its pretty normal for midsizes. Hilux goes with 2350, S10 with 2300 Even Our compacts like Fiat Toro or Renault Oroch have 1600/1700 Here, as in Australia, And NZ we dont tow normally. So all goes to the bed The only towing is when working the farms (sowers, fertilizers, grain trailers) but is always on dirt roads and slowly

[@tazeat]

I miss small reg cab trucks. I probably wouldn't be a buyer anymore given kids, but I loved all my reg cabs when I was younger, and I imagine a lot of current younger generation and work fleets would agree. There's a reason even in the f150 I still have a supercab and the 6.5', hate tiny beds, what's the point?

[@appalachiangunman9589]

The first truck I ever had was a 1978 Ford F100 with an 8 ft bed. It’s nice when you can buy a bunch of 8ft 2X4’s, lay them flat in the bed, then close the tailgate. The first truck I ever drove was my dads 95 F250, it had an 8 ft bed too and even with the aluminum toolbox in the back you could still fit a Honda Foreman 500 and close the tailgate. I bet the trailer companies today are really digging the short bed trend though.

[@DaveSoCal]

Does it have cruise control ?😮

[@jmc6000]

Lol 😂

[@302Mustang13]

Standard.

[@BoostedMaverick]

FYI, Ford is going to offer a sub $20k version in a regular cab long bed called the Ranchero soon

[@302Mustang13]

Is that Maverick based? If they do I'm saving up.

[@atx4fun]

Knowing Ford, that will be for one year, limited supplies and then it will increase $5-10k because they wont make the base anymore. Just like what they have done with the Maverick. The truck is up $5k from what it was introduced as and you can't find a base xl hybrid anywhere without a dealer mark up because of no supply of that configuration.

[@302Mustang13]

@@atx4fun Maverick is still a bargain. Base price is around $24k with a 2.0 turbo four with 250 horsepower and 277 lb-ft. Even an XLT with AWD can be had for under $30k. A good comparison (non truck though) is the inexpensive Chevy Trax that doesn't even have AWD and is about $23k with a 1.2 3cyl putting out a measley 138 horsepower with a six speed. Those can get up to $30k easily and still can go much higher.

[@prairiestrong1106]

60k for a Lariat in Alberta. Yikes.

[@shaniyoung6506]

WHAT DID YOU JUST SAY☠️

[@BROON71]

That's $44,554 USD ..

[@shaniyoung6506]

@@BROON71 on i thought the 60k was in USD

[@BROON71]

@@shaniyoung6506 I think that $60K figure was in Canadian Dollars..

[@lesterparker1594]

I bought my 2021 ranger xlt brand new for $31k. I thought that was high. I have 42k miles on it now and I’ve been happy with it. I haven’t had any issues with it at all. Been a perfect truck

[@johnkoko]

I actually like the styling. More truckish than the previous Gen

[@jackbrown3193]

I actually agree. But I do see his point about it kinda looking like an SUV which makes me think... What if the next gen explorer used that styling? I mean back in the day the first gen explorer was built on the ranger platform so it might be a cool way to point back to the explorers routes.

[@maplelodge2]

Yes! time for the ultimate review of all the 2024 mid size trucks in the market

[@BUCKSHOTSTV]

If ford were to make the ranger squared like the F250, I’d sell my house for one lol. But seriously, a square shaped mid sized truck is my dream truck. The Nissan frontier almost comes close, but something about it doesn’t convince me. A ford ranger in the same f250 shape would be my dream come true.

[@KnightXV]

Front end looks better than the previous gen

[@THEpicND]

You smoking

[@lesterparker1594]

No way.

[@302Mustang13]

It looks Everest. I like the new better.

[@jbrou123]

Debatable, because it looks pretty much like every other truck out there where as the previous Ranger had a different look from all others.

[@jmc6000]

At least has cruise control standard unlike your Colorado Andre!

[@RADAdv346]

Fark so many more features then in Australia where the bloody thing is designed

[@1drummer172]

I love everything about it except that there is no moonroof option.

[@christianalvarez7799]

Number 1 selling car in Australia

[@RedWingsninetyone]

At least this looks like an SUV from the front and not a crossover like the last version.

[@cpear760]

Not all of us need a back seat. Had a Volvo for 17 years, back seat was mint.

[@jellyroll2830]

The step should be standard, if you need trailer back up assist you shouldn’t be towing anything, the truck inside and out already looks outdated, the best safety feature is you not the gadgets and gizmos. It’s trash.

[@302Mustang13]

Interior looks much better than the new Tacoma and almost as nice as the Colorado. Last gen Ranger was solid and this is a nice upgrade. It's worth the money and going to be very competitive.

[@Heyzeus71]

Generally, you should not use an inverter larger than 400 watts with a car or truck starter battery. I keep seeing you mention the 400w limitations. It is for a good reason.

[@DanielRodriguez-fv5os]

A lot of people don’t want to spend the extra money on options and some just can’t afford to that’s why they are called options and packages

[@zkiller195]

Not a fan of the styling because it looks like an SUV from the front and not a truck? Like how a Tacoma looks like a 4Runner from the front? Or how the Expedition looks like an F150 fron the front? Or how a Yukon looks like a Sierra from the front? An SUV is literally a truck without a bed. Of course it looks like an SUV from the front, just like every truck...

[@ravensfootball52]

Maybe it was a nice way to say it looks ugly. It’s the worst looking of the midsized trucks imo

[@curly__3]

The bed step holds 300 lbs? So i'm a fit 6'2'' dude that weighs 230... Add a 25 lb tool belt and i'm lifting something up out of the bed that weighs 75 lbs, is that going to break? 300 lbs is not nearly enough. It should be 450 lb's minimum. I know half a dozen guys that weigh 300 give or take 15 lbs... That is chincy and not something i would expect to see on an american truck.

[@raulgallardo5140]

Guys thats size probably wont be buying trucks this small lol plus lifting 75lbs over the side of the truck instead of out the back isnt smart no matter how strong you are

[@curly__3]

@@raulgallardo5140 ... You sound like a japanese auto engineer.

[@raulgallardo5140]

@@curly__3 just being realistic

[@alvilla701]

If you are 6'2", 230 lbs, you need an F150. Ranges, Tacomas, etc, are specifically made for people like me; 5'8", 162 lbs. I have an F150, and it is just to big for me, specially the seat, I don't like it at all. I think I'll never buy another full size truck

[@curly__3]

@@alvilla701 what? They don't make trucks for different sizes of people... The f150 costs twice as much. This ranger looks chincy and costs way too much as it is. Looks like a total american fascist corporate/union ripoff.

[@randysavage8963]

Straight to the point thanks for the video

[@slmjake]

Andre great job! I want a crew cab 6 foot bed Ranger! Please tell Ford some of us work with these mid sized trucks!!

[@morningdrums]

Just the styling just cant compete along the canyon and colorado. Yet ford built the bronco, beautiful. Wish ford would give this a more aggressive look, bigger tires and lift kits with metal skid plates.

[@Benjamin06267485]

All the safety needed is the driver behind the wheel. 😂😂😂

[@comodice905]

Bloke that's wild

[@nathanielmcguire6685]

I like the exterior and everything else but the auto trailer backup is such a bad idea,if you can’t back up to a trailer with mirrors you shouldn’t be pulling a trailer

[@Doc1855]

The front of the Ranger looks a lot like the Maverick. It’s too bad that Ford doesn’t bring back the original 2.3L 4cyl engine that was naturally aspirated like in the original Ranger’s from the 80s. Those engines were Bulletproof. We owned 2 of them. We put over 700K miles on one of them and over 500K miles on the other. The one with over 500K was still running strong, not burning any oil, but the electrical system fried, destroying the pickup. Yes they were a bit gutless , but just give it more time to get up to speed and they ran great. Mate them to a 6spd manual transmission with the right gears and they’ll go fine. All of our Ranger’s were 4WD. Our 3rd one had a 3.0L V6 but it started having a lot of issues when it hit 80K miles. Our last one had the 4.0L V6. If was 13 years old when we sold it less than a month ago and that’s when we bought our 23 Tacoma TRD double cab, Premium pkg and a 6’ bed.

[@levigato125]

The 2025 Maverick will have the same front end.

[@ALMX5DP]

Rose colored glasses are in full effect if you’re opining about a Pinto engine.

[@amandahuginkiss4098]

Interesting but the original Ranger was from 1965- not the 80's.

[@Doc1855]

@@ALMX5DP The Pinto engine was the 1.9L When the Ranger’s first came out they had either a 2.0L, which was a GUTLESS 4 banger, but the 2.3L had 90-110hp. Then they increased the horsepower of the 2.3L to 118-125. The XL came with a 4spd manual and the XLT had the 5spd. The 4WD models had a 5spd manual with a “Granny” low. The 3rd member (rear end) had 4.11 and 4.73 gears which allowed the Ranger’s to tend to be quicker. We have to remember that when the Ranger’s first came out, they replaced the Ford Courier pickup, which was a Re-Badged Mazda, which were extremely light weight but had double walled beds. In 83 when the Ranger first came out, they were bare bones. Vinyl flooring and bench seat, No power steering, crank windows, no A/C and some weren’t even equipped with an AM radio. For 1-2 years the Pinto did have the 2.3L, but it was detuned and had only 72-80 horsepower. The Pinto was a Unibody car, whereas the Ranger had a “C” frame. I think it was in the 08 redesign of the Ranger that received a full box frame. By the late 80s Ford offered a variety choices of engines in the Ranger. The 2.9L was a peppy V6, but it was replaced by the 3.0L V6 that had less horsepower and torque than the 4.0L V6, but got the same fuel economy. Ford had some issues with the early 4.0L V6, but those issues were corrected by 08. When Ford switched from the 2.3L Belt driven engine, they tweaked the engine when it went to the Chain Driven. The Timing Chain driven 2.3L engine wasn’t nearly as reliable as the Belt driven. When the Chain driven engine came out, we bought one with the 3.0L V6. It ran perfectly until it hit 80K miles and then it started burning a LOT of oil. We sold it and told the next owner about the oil consumption. He had to replace the engine. Our last Ranger was our 11. It had the 4.0L V6 and a 5spd automatic transmission, 3.55 gears in the rear. It was a very nice little pickup. It was an XLT super cab 4WD of course. We drove it until last month (2/24) and that’s when we bought our 23 Tacoma TRD Off Road, double cab, premium pkg and a 6’ bed. At my age and since I drive about 5-6K miles per year, our current Toyota will be the last truck I’ll ever own. Enjoy your day, Cheers

[@AdamKueflef]

​@@ALMX5DP The 2.3&2.5 were Lima's not Pinto's

[@ljneiderhiser7619]

Trailer backup on a ranger? What are you hauling? Groceries? Not to mention as a ford guy I think that option is dumb. If you can't back a trailer you have no buisness using one.

[@jbrou123]

The Ranger can tow 7,500 lbs. The back up assist is not needed, but is part of the advanced tow pack which has the brake controller, which is need for towing 7,500 lbs.

[@CarswithNash]

How is adaptive cruise control a safety feature?! If you're paying that little attention to the road that adaptive cruise control is saving you from a dangerous situation, you don't belong on the road!

[@the305hauler]

Booyah 👊🏽 😁 👍🏽 🇺🇸

[@ethanmckibbin]

It does look like an SUV because Ford put the Everest front end on it which is the SUV version of the ranger that's not sold here.

[@michaelwalsh3474]

Well, I knew that last one was coming... The AutoZone spec is popular for a reason but Ford rather sell you a Maverick. Hopefully the maverick production picks up.

[@acekingd8384]

They have to upscale due to the Maverick. Which is now low 30s

[@williamcrist1887]

I agree the looks are not so good. We have a 2019 with 150K on it now and would like to trade in for a new one. But the looks don’t help. Would also like to see a moon roof

[@Valaran1]

I don't get the point of the bed step in the rear. If I want to reach something in the rear, I just open the damn tailgate.

[@munkydotorg]

Dang that payload. My F150 hybrid 4x4 is rated less than that. Not bad

[@SteveB88]

Judging by the styling, it kind of looks like they combined the Ranger with the Maverick

[@bucksshots3109]

The payload is crazy. My F150 Tremor is only 1564lbs

[@carsanmar13]

Funny you say the ge front looks like an SUV, well there IS a SUV that is on the t6 platform is very much is a ranger in SUV body shape called the everest and shares a great deal of parts with this new ranger

[@seansaxon641]

Isn't it crazy that it took someone almost 100 years to say "Hey. Why don't we put a step in the rear bumper?" And Ford/Ram still haven't made it standard on any of their trucks.

[@jbrou123]

Don't you remember the step side PUs? I link to see something like that again.

[@16BitOG]

Adaptive cruise isn't a safety feature wtf.

[@jebsdaddy141]

I caught that too. Had it on a Tundra and didn't trust it because the Tundra would see phantom collisions from time to time.

[@Makemysammich23]

There is no reason why the price is so high for vehicles this day. Especially with all the technology that’s out there without having to go develop it, it’s already there, just use it.

[@etlespino669]

Looks like a maverick now 🤢

[@CharlesWilson-zs3vd]

Yeah, I'm not impressed.

[@camaroman101]

The maverick looks better than this.

[@arthurwright255]

Its a soft looking truck. The cactus gray with chrome plus the tan interior has got to be the worst specs possible for a Ranger.

[@Urapunk]

Ford effin ranger!!! Better payload than my tundra 😂

[@Ashoud_Anobetah]

Looks like the last version just new lights

[@stevenhood3313]

Hate list is really lame. Looks much better than it's competition. You expect adaptive cruise on a base model? Why would you?

[@boskosubotic]

Ah, blago vama, kod vas pada sneg ❤

[@Clevelandsteamer324]

Should be offered in a base model with manual transmission and manual locking hubs 4x4 no options other than a/c

[@peterdaniel66]

Adaptive cruise control is not a safety issue. In fact, it actually teaches you how to not pay attention and drive poorly therefore.

[@jbrou123]

So do all those other 'nanny state' 'safety features' like lane keep assist and lane departure warning. Just keep your eyes on the road, not the phone.

[@markv78]

How's the room in the back seat compared to the taco? Let's take it the same trail the toco broke and retest both I think we're gonna find it beats the taco

[@CraigG21]

Would trade gimmicky backup assist for a more useful 4wd Auto mode.

[@lucianoosorio5942]

Missing cooled seats and still no v6 engine na.

[@shanewilson9250]

ACC should be standard on all vehicles.

[@AHungryHunky]

"It only comes as a crew cab, short bed, but it can hold up to 1800lbs." "Where?" I just dont get it. The numbers keep going up, and the work keeps getting lighter.

[@mr.dr.teddyman7157]

I'm good with my 87 ranger single cab long bed

[@Chromatrix1]

I’m not sure why Ford and GM still use this antiquated and ill placed antenna. If you put a cap or rack on the truck it sticks up into that space. Every time you load lumber, ladders or a kayak the antenna has to be folded down manually as to not damage it. Shark fin antennas are small compact and solve that problem. This is a deal breaker for me-it reduces the utility of what a truck does and becomes annoying when you have to fold it down multiple times per week/month/year.

[@Gun-cun-lun-nun]

Hey I have a question tho. Is black series a real off road camper or are they just for looks

[@braalo07]

The Chevy is my favourite in the looks. Taco is the next best looking then the Ranger and then the GMC

[@zackduck3272]

Can anyone explain why the 2wd payload would be more then 4wd? Just curious.

[@jminaya90]

Now that vehicle has a recall because when you fill up the gasoline tank it will spilt out

[@302Mustang13]

Are you talking about the Maverick?

[@jminaya90]

@@302Mustang13 no… the ranger

[@302Mustang13]

@@jminaya90 in the US? Never heard of it.

[@jminaya90]

@@302Mustang13 if you live in USA and have that truck they will send you that letter or you can go to the website and find out yourself

[@Mikey-wf9py]

All those high tech features are negative to me because when stuff really hits the fan and there is no dealership to go do or garage. What vehicles are going to keep driving around if we really did like go to a severe war and everything was over as you knew it. Yes this is a huge hypothetical but even without that hypothetical the more stuff a car has the more things there are to break the more things you have to maintain and also the more modules. This is why batteries don't last as long. Not to mention everything is just made like crap in today's world. Man. Sometimes buying parts that are from like 10 years ago but still in the box. Unopened are better than buying the exact same part today because somehow it was built better 10 years ago. Like just very strange. Everything in this world is strange right now and I wouldn't buy a new car unless you're going to pay for it with cash because then you own it. The bank doesn't own it and if you want to sell it in a year or two years you can get your money back or most of it. But if you're financing stupid I think financing and leasing is the dumbest thing in the world depending on your life. Like if you need your car and all you're doing is driving. Yeah sure leasing might be a good idea for you but if you're everyday due to just goes to work and punches the clock you don't need a brand new car bro especially if you just going to be paying arm and a leg for it for the next 3000 years like f*** that

[@someuser1234]

Bring back single cabs

[@ronclements2002]

It’s a truck look on a mini van chassis I’m assuming?

[@rocklow243]

Yeah looks like maverick or just a over seas truck

[@jovanisiliezar3733]

Isn't an suv just a truck w more seats ?? That's probably y they look similar this guys reviews are always weird

[@human1513]

What is the towing capcity?

[@shaniyoung6506]

What i hate about it is: 1. No N/A V6 2. Lack of trim levels(No more tremor) 3. No more orange for the regular ranger+it is my favourite color

[@tracygraham5379]

The V6will be available later this year. Fingers crossed.

[@zkiller195]

​@@tracygraham5379The 2.7t and 3.0t 6 cylinders, yes. They specifically said NA 6 cylinder though, which won't be available for this generation, or probably ever again.

[@302Mustang13]

Naturally aspirated V6 is overrated. A 3.3 V6 would be adequate while the 2.7 V6 twin turbo is a borderline hot rod truck.

[@shaniyoung6506]

@@302Mustang13 Never even realized it was overrated

[@302Mustang13]

@@shaniyoung6506 Go drive an F-150 reg cab 2WD with the 3.3 V6 and then drive a 2.7 Ecoboost with 4x4 and crew cab. The heavier version with the 2.7 TT V6 will dust the lighter 3.3 V6 version.

[@Shareefhamida]

But here’s the real question, is it a ford effin Ranger ?!?? !!!

[@drunk_by_noon9231]

Can you compare it to a 90s Ford ranger?

[@mikematthews2985]

Looks like a ford explorer sport

[@Mikey-wf9py]

I mean look around man when you see old cars driving around are they high level trim or base models? Most of the time they're basic and there's a reason why they're still driving

[@morgankovarik3649]

I wish we would have gotten the 5 cylinder diesel manual in the Rangers

[@jwagner1993]

That's the new Maverick?😅

[@technom3598]

I prefer no radar cruise.

[@ril850_1]

Major miss byt Ford on the styling compared to the latest GM twins and Tacoma.

[@302Mustang13]

It's a little more safe on styling, but the Colorado is too bold IMO.

[@OrcaBoat3]

That automatically computer-controlled turning steering wheel will come in real handy when you're driving on the highway at 65 miles an hour, and it decides it wants to show off its special features. Then you end up in a ditch

[@erics8696]

just turn it off.

[@The-fs5wn]

That’s… not how it works at all. It has to be manually turned on, and the dial can’t be turned without you turning it.

[@OrcaBoat3]

Yea, just like the computer-controls on the new Boeing airplanes which, every now and then, decide to nose-dive the airplane. Get rid of all this high-tech nonsense and let human beings drive the truck. @@The-fs5wn

[@302Mustang13]

Sounds like you are talking about lane centering. On my Ford it can be switched off on the steering wheel. Second, it requires both hands on the wheel like you always should do. It isn't BlueCruise.

[@dougcaro7480]

The new Colorado looks like a Toyota?

[@fredkuhn165]

Full size trucks are going super cab short bed. Still plenty of room to haul your tampons

[@CrimeVid]

No long bed ?

[@nathanlewis3462]

My 21 Explorer has a payload of 1,500 lbs...

[@AfternoonProductions]

Place your over under bets now, maverick or ranger first to die from fords lineup?

[@CustomerService-ut9tj]

$50K for a little truck? Apparently the unions win..?

[@danielwoods404]

"It looks like an SUV not a truck"??? Dumb opinion. I like the styling.

[@tomsartain8071]

Hate is an Ugly Ugly word!

[@tracygraham5379]

The Ranger Raptor looks good but the other Rangers not so much.

[@secondcreekworkshop3908]

Daddy cabs only now.

[@neilcarter77]

No one really wants steelys-especially in colder climates!