Absolutely impressive. I've seen the construction site a few times and I have to say it went pretty quickly. Beautiful building.
@NYCSKYSCRAPERS-hp6pmАй бұрын
My favorite new tower looks god from all angles and from a distance
@frankv7068Ай бұрын
lol so many years following skyscraper page forums and I’m American, and Ijust figured out with your video that facade is pronounced sounding like “fassad” and not “fackaid”🤣, nice progress can’t wait for the real gem in that area 175 Park Ave!
@creedencebakken2686Ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@dukeofhaasАй бұрын
This building's design is monstrous. Its vertical antecedent is the uninspiring and monolithic John Hancock in Chicago, and its street stance is reminiscent of the Solow (9 W57th St) and Citicorp, both accused of causing pedestrian vertigo and generalized angst.
@doomisagreatgameАй бұрын
it’s supposed to be practical, so it’s more than reasonable for it to be dull I should also mention that this was the same stance as the World Trade Center, which over time become beloved, so it’s also expected that this will be the same thing
@NYCybertruckАй бұрын
I personally love it. I’m glad we’re finally meaningfully filling out the skyline for the first time in decades.
@Ray03595Ай бұрын
Best NYC supertall in ages IMO and its design actually fits into the history of NYC.
@RocketStudio-uf2skАй бұрын
@@doomisagreatgamepeople still miss the old WTC
@largol33t129 күн бұрын
I however do appreciate the unusual diamond shaped brace on the sides. It offers some relief from the monotonous all-glass facades of the other buildings but it doesn't look bad on it either.
@anthonyboarman383315 күн бұрын
I would think the diagonal bracing would be part or the steel skeleton. Like the Hancock building in Chicago.
@AlexgudmusicАй бұрын
woah, I just realized how new this channel is. great info and quality videos. hope your channel grows fast.
@gregsmith3410Ай бұрын
Brooklyn Tower dark bronze facade looks similar.
@BradizbakeDАй бұрын
What a stunning addition to NYC.
@AlexgudmusicАй бұрын
I love the design. a future icon. I want to visit some of these citys
@martinamelung4261Ай бұрын
Do that, the street canyons of New York are always a blast. It will fascinate you.
@naplesbluesrt23 күн бұрын
Think they had to use the CB building due to 'air rights'. Could be wrong though.
@imlx667Ай бұрын
Agreed. They demolished a 200-meter tower to build a 400-meter one. Not the smartest move.
@Nostalg1aАй бұрын
@MrGriff305-j7s It's not progress. Waste and bigger office space isn't progress.
@Channel-ir3el4 күн бұрын
They recycled it
@imlx667Ай бұрын
I don't like the way these rhombuses look from afar, from the city panorama.
@bryguy24Ай бұрын
you are thinking of Lever house - predates Seagram and right across the street
@scraperinfoАй бұрын
Yes!!! It’s odd how some sites don’t give it credit for being first modern skyscraper, but yes thanks for reminding us!
@davidkoenig85922 күн бұрын
Dude, Seagram was finished in 1958.
@scraperinfo2 күн бұрын
Yes it was, and Lever House even earlier in 1950-1952. Really fascinating, a lot earlier than I thought.
@copa8Ай бұрын
Looks like the Bank of China Tower in HK.
@thejokerjoker508Ай бұрын
Kind of yess from the side
@sentinespiАй бұрын
they look nothing alike
@Nostalg1aАй бұрын
What an unproportionate mess. Kitschy all the way
@h4f3ou5hАй бұрын
how? what are you even talking about? would you rather it be a giant rectangle? its one of the most natural looking buildings
@Nostalg1aАй бұрын
@ Look at actual art deco buildings or a RAMSA design, those are proper setbacks. This is just a gigantic disproportionate greedy hunk of steel and glass with no elegance or detail. Even the Sears Tower did it better and it isn’t the prettiest thing out there.
@laeihbvaljefhbvalejfhbvАй бұрын
Destroy a Chicago Style building to preserve a modernist and boring Union Carbide Building?!?! Hello? No lol.
@sammann251Ай бұрын
yeah what.
@DasaniSaltWaterАй бұрын
Have you even seen the old building? It was even more boring than this one
@scraperinfoАй бұрын
Well I look at it from two perspectives, that specific one I showed isn’t as impressive as other buildings in the city in terms of its style, I’m not a fan of preserving every single building of course, only impressive ones. Second, my main thing is making an impressive skyline, and that means adding to the height of of the skyline. Yes the union carbide building was not decoratively impressive, but height wise it was, and I’m all for facelifts, like many other buildings on park Ave itself that had facelifts done. Let me know what you think!