When does Quantumania Happen in the MCU Timeline?

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Here is a link to the timeline documents: drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1R_PrexMkTjYpQAraxlhzs2U5EPJEPioc If you'd like to join the discord server, here is a link: discord.gg/r7Y3FyNBk4. There are over 300 members so far. Love to have you be part of the conversation!

[@serpentlord1312]

Why is Ant Man 3 placed in May I thought you said it was in July?

[@AbitofEverything4U]

@@serpentlord1312 Oops! Good catch. I had it right in the image but not in the document. Got it fixed now. Thanks so much for mentioning that!

[@serpentlord1312]

@@AbitofEverything4U I literally just saw somebody say this is what Phase 1 would look like if Warner Bros owned the Mcu: Iron Man 1 Iron Man 2 Guardians of the Galaxy vol 1 Captain America The First Avenger and The Avengers 1 I’m pretty sure this is them poking fun at how Warner Bros handled the DCEU but that’s just my guess.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

@@serpentlord1312 LOL! Yeah, that would indeed be an interesting Phase 1. I agree, I suspect it was a joke.

[@maasl4236]

You should be the official MCU's timeline keeper! You're clearly doing a fantastic job and you're putting more effort in than some well-paid Marvel execs.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Thanks! Really appreciate the positive feedback. Honestly, I'd do the job for free. Heck, I might even pay Marvel to let me do it. Would be so much fun. Call me Marvel...I'll keep an open line!

[@captainjakemerica4579]

I do enjoy watching your timeline videos because even as a die-hard fan like me sometimes I get confused on when certain movies and shows take place

[@AbitofEverything4U]

@@captainjakemerica4579 Thanks! I really appreciate that!

[@ThatSpeedrunnerGuy]

You have no idea how much I nerded out on the credit-scenes, my dad and my friend just looked at me as if like ‘what are you doing?’ ‘Why are you shocked?’ And I quote I went “that’s, tha, that’s I-Immortus, tha-that’s Rama Tut,” while sliding off my seat.

[@Zack207]

yo do you Speedrun Odyssey?

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yeah, that was so amazing to see those variants. Marvel is leaning in heavy with every type of Kang we've ever seen. I think Phase 5 and 6 are gonna be insane!

[@myadoesrandomthings]

Yeah I was geeking out the whole time. You know that Edna meme where she’s smiling and mr incredible is grossed out, Yeah enda was me…

[@Loosetext]

Same!

[@ThatSpeedrunnerGuy]

@@Zack207 I’ve done a few runs of a few different categories like Any% Nipple% Festival% and All Signs but they were all unrecorded.

[@phantom2683]

"Hello MCU fans" at the beginning sounded a lot like David Dastmalchian as Veb in Quantumania

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Nice! Love that dude. He was great in the Ant-Man movies and in The Suicide Squad. Glad he keeps getting work. We need more of him in our lives!

[@captainjakemerica4579]

I'm glad to know that he played the Veb no Luis is the only thing about this movie that I would change I really was hoping he would be back for this movie and could have a narration of MCU events leading up to this movie

[@benb4192]

Is it possible there was a separate incident 2 years before the events of Antman where a man in a bee costume tried to kill Cassie when she was 6?

[@AbitofEverything4U]

I do love that idea...and I think it could have been a hilarious way to solve it. However, Peyton doubled down and actually said she's six IN the Ant-Man movie. Ugh!

[@emanuelrodriguez9044]

@@AbitofEverything4U So they retcon her to be 16 now?

[@AbitofEverything4U]

@@emanuelrodriguez9044 Personally, I think Peyton got her age in Antman wrong. I think she was 8. And I think in the movie Cassie just said the wrong age because she forgot. Peyton's quotes have been all over the place, so I don't trust him at all. But that's just my take on it. Maybe the timeline book will tell us for sure.

[@catmario-_3170]

@@AbitofEverything4U Yeah she was 8. This mistake can be seen as a plothole probably

[@AbitofEverything4U]

@@catmario-_3170 Right...either a plothole or Cassie just forgot her age and Scott was polite and didn't correct her.

[@MrMario501]

Just came out of the theater, and wow! It wasn’t a perfect movie, but it does an amazing job of setting up the future. And Cassie’s age did confuse me because I thought she was supposed to be 18 during Quantumania, but idk.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yeah, I thought it was a good movie as well. Not sure what movie the critics saw. And the good news is that Cassie was indeed 18 in QM. The bad news is they messed up her age in the line in the car. She should have said 8 instead of 6. Sigh.

[@captainjakemerica4579]

Wow and Kathryn Newton was probably 25 at the time of filming so she has a youthful complex like Tom Holland apparently

[@josinfleurs]

Loved that you changed Love & Thunder's placement! I completely agree with that, let's hope they confirm our theory 🙏🏻

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, I really do hope that we are right about Thor: L&T. C'mon Timeline Keeper, make it so!

[@isaacazocar3155]

I guess Peyton Reed, aside from absolutely being drunk, was attributing Cassie's age to Abby Ryder Fortson's age DURING FILMING. Born in March 2008, She was six when they shot Ant-Man from August to December 2014, and she was nine when Ant-Man and the Wasp was shot from August to November 2017. And then, he didn't even do math, but knew Cassie had to be 18 in Quantumania.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes I think you nailed it. What's just so weird is that Reed wouldn't take 5 seconds to do a word search on his scripts to find that they gave Cassie the age 10 in AM&TW. That's how I found that line. Took like no time at all. Sigh. But that's what happens when you truly believe that you can take the timeline and "throw it all out the window". Ugh.

[@Byronic19134]

​@@AbitofEverything4U I don't think Reed didn't take the time he simply hated the 2nd Ant Man and did his own thing.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

@@Byronic19134 Agreed...he totally ignored the second movie!

[@azultarmizi]

@@AbitofEverything4U he should've been the one getting replaced instead of the endgame's cassie actor

[@AbitofEverything4U]

@@azultarmizi Preach it!

[@Richmond.Reviews]

Great video man, I love the video. I kind of expected as we went into phase 5 that the timeline would go into 2026 but the reasons that you gave definitely proves the 2025 timeline. I’m also really annoyed at Nate Moore, him saying that the timeline gets thrown out the window makes me feel like the timeline book will be useless. Man, its so an annoying. Anyway, great video and the multiversal ties video will help me understand those confusing credit scenes.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, I was very disappointed in Peyton Reed for not doing research on his own movies to see that Cassie was 10 in AM&TW. I do hope his sentiment that things "get thrown out the window" was more a case of him trying to cover up his mistakes. It certainly doesn't provide confidence in the book if it is Marvel's philosophy overall, but I hope that isn't the case. And yes, the next video should be helpful in understanding the bigger picture of Kang. Thanks so much for watching the vid and leaving your feedback. Really appreciate it!

[@TheTuxedoCat-sh5fn]

The age thing with Cassie and miscalculation with Homecoming are equally frustrating haha The latter more so, since they have the big title card, plus it mentioned once or twice by Toomes about Avengers 1, and Happy with “8 years” mentioned in relation to Iron Man 1’s 2008 release date

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, good point about the 8 years later issues. That was really bad. I guess the age issue drives me crazy since Marvel now supposedly has a timeline keeper, is putting out a timeline book (a pricey one at that), and yet still has directors giving interviews saying the timeline can be "thrown out the window". My word. So frustrating!

[@realjohnlove]

5:54 Cassie telling Scott “its not my birthday” & he says “well I’m making up for all the ones I missed” Is why I don’t think its best to say Quantumania happens over the course of 3 days. Its possible what we see is him giving a full “catch up” from him returning to the snap because both him & Hope have a date on a red carpet, plus meeting with their suits in various places & the book tour. I would summate the actual plot does occur over a few days but not everything in the movie as its meant to give you a “heres what happened since the last time you saw me” Which means its possible the ending could occur months after the fight with Kang. Should be noted we also don’t know how much time passed in the real world from when he went into the Quantum Realm. Scott mentions “we don’t know how much has changed since we’ve been going it could be years again” It may not be years but it could have weeks or months.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Good point! Yes, I think the majority of the movie is right around a day, but the ending scene back on earth could indeed be alot later. That would make celebrating her other b-days make even more sense. Nice call!

[@captainjakemerica4579]

I got a feeling that reality isn't so cut-and-dry like many fans say it is I got a feeling Kang is messing with Scott and it'll be revealed that he didn't return to the prime MCU timeline he's in some sort of distorted Universe it wouldn't surprise me if Kang has some Mysterio like technology that is messing with Scott's perception of reality

[@AbitofEverything4U]

@@captainjakemerica4579 Yeah, I've heard alot of people with the same type of theory. Will be interesting to see where things go from here with that wild ending!

[@Buffy8Fan]

I look at Cassie saying the age six line as her not remembering the exact age or date from then until _Quantumania._ It may be confusing to figure timelines out, but character-wise its very true to real life.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yup, I totally agree that in-universe the mistake makes sense and is very understandable for Cassie to forget. My bigger concern was that the writer and director of the movie thought she was 6 as well...Peyton Reed said as much in his interviews. Additionally, Peyton said she was 9 in AM&TW (a movie he directed) even though Scott said she was 10 in the movie. So what drove me nuts was they totally retconned her age and didn't even seem to acknowledge they retconned it, making it seem like it was a lack of attention to detail. Very weird. But it seems the plan was to do the retcon to make her be 18 in the year 2026. I'm still not sure why that was so important to them, but it seems that was their goal. Hope that makes sense. But back to your original point, I think you nailed it. It's very understandable from an in-universe standpoint for Cassie to have made that mistake. Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@Buffy8Fan]

@@AbitofEverything4U It makes sense, but I also wouldn't pay attention to cast and crew concerning the timeline even if they did know, and they never seem to. lol. To me, it's about identifying, studying, and understanding details in-universe.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

@@Buffy8Fan Yup, in-universe storyline is the most important. I just wish the creative teams could avoid going out and giving factually incorrect / confusing interviews, as it makes me worried. But in-universe logic is much more important in the end.

[@TheTurdle]

I loved this film. It knew how to combine an Ant-Man film and a Kang setup, Jonathan Majors literally gave me chills in every one of his scenes, MODOK was done perfectly in my oponion and the character relationships were done very well without interrupting the pace of the film, sure the film isn't perfect and I have a few nitpicks such as how the ending could have been a little better or Baskin Robbins Scott randomly appearing in the probability field for no reason but otherwise a really enjoyable film with what might be possibly my favourite credit scenes of any MCU film to date, seeing all the Kangs together just like in the comics and then Loki was such an experience, solid 8.9/10 from me.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yeah, I agree, it was a great movie and I don't get the RT critic score. So strange. I think your feedback was spot on. Can't wait to see where Kang pops up next. So glad you enjoyed the movie!

[@quintessences]

I too also really liked Quantumania, in fact I just got out of seeing it as I’m writing this. Was there weird pacing? Sure but it was in no way a bad movie. Same with eternals I think eternals is severely underrated.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Agreed on both. I thought both QM and Eternals were much better than the critics rated them. Not perfect movies, but at least a 7/10 for sure!

[@captainjakemerica4579]

My thoughts exactly even though I will fully admit I give this movie a little more of a glowing review because I am a huge fan of Kathryn Newton and it was also my first movie date so I'm always going to have that special connection with it and I did love Jonathan Majors as Kang also and can't wait to see him back and hoping he doesn't get recast

[@AbitofEverything4U]

@@captainjakemerica4579 I agree, Kathryn Newton was great in the movie. And it's awesome that it was a date movie for you. That will be a lasting memory for sure!

[@josinfleurs]

But anyways, Quantumania was AMAZING! I don't care about the critics, the movie was great and I had so much fun with it, I got goosebumps watching the post-credits scenes... I can't wait for Kang's future.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, the movie was amazing overall. Critics were as drunk as Peyton during his interview. Kang will take over Phase 5 and 6!

[@DarthDesolous]

I agree with you exactly. I walked out of the movie theater on the premiere night at the 7 PM showing in Baton Rouge Louisiana. I walked out of that show thinking this was one heck of a movie. I really enjoyed it. It further the story along. I get to my car that’s in a parking garage and I turn on KZbin and the first thing I see on KZbin is people bashing Ant-man quantum mania. And I watch the first video. I couldn’t believe what I was hearing in that video. They’re trying to compare it to the comic books and it should be crystal clear by now that the comics and the MCU are two totally different separate properties where the MCU draws from the comic books, but has its own way of telling stuff. If these were selected straight from the comics and not changed, why would we want to go to the movies and see them in the first place when we know exactly how it will end. Don’t know when people will get it through their thick skulls that it’s two different properties.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

@@DarthDesolous Preach it! I agree 100%...why would I go to the movies to see the exact thing that was in the comics. I like that the MCU puts their own spin on things and gives us a new story that still has nods to the source material. I just don't get that RT critic score at all.

[@captainjakemerica4579]

I really don't get why the fandom acts like Marvel had made of black sheep with this movie though I will fully admit I am a little more biased than some on this movie since it was my first movie date with my amazing girlfriend who I might be going to go see any future MCU movies with from this point on

[@AbitofEverything4U]

​@@captainjakemerica4579 Yeah, I agree, it's surprising how people piled on it so severely. It wasn't my favorite Marvel movie but it was much better than critics said. And congrats on your new girlfriend...hope you two enjoy many more marvel movies together!

[@realjohnlove]

8:44 Also remember we’ve had this same conversation about Taika Waititi & Nate Moore. Outside of film interviews do not affect the canon, we still dont know if the writers or directors of Endgame are correct about Cap’s ending

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, I agree that the directors are clueless. My biggest concern was Peyton's statement about the timeline being "thrown out the window". Oh my! That's alot worse than Taika's ramblings.

[@CC-yx2rt]

I think it’s interesting how the amount of time the story takes has decreased with each movie. Ant-man takes place over the course of a few weeks, ant-man and the wasp takes place over the course of a few days, and I think ant-man and the wasp:quantumania takes place over the course of a few hours. I wouldn’t say this is a bad thing, but it changes the character acrs. I imagine that origin stories have to span more time, so I suppose that makes sense.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Very interesting observation. I hadn't noticed that, but you are right. And boy did a lot happen in just a few hours in this movie!

[@ecanales]

you didn’t talk about how when Kang returned the energy blast from that one freedom fighter with the laser for a head he looked similar to when shang chi returned wenwu’s attack with the 10 rings

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Oh drat, I didn't mention that. Yes, that's a great point. So many hints that we've been seeing some of Kang's tech popping up in the MCU. Can't wait for them to tie it all together. Thanks for the excellent feedback!

[@canonblackwell1]

I think when they made the original Ant-Man they intended her to be 6 in that movie because they hired a 6 year old actor and then that changed haphazardly in Ant-Man and the Wasp when they wrote in the quote from Scott saying she’s 10. But in the producer’s mind she was still originally 6 and it was reconned to fit better with the timeline they made.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yup, I suspect you nailed it regarding them retconning Cassie's age to be the actresses age in AM 1. Ironically, the actress was around 9 1/2 when they filmed AM&TW, so the 10 year old line worked better for that film. But I do think they messed up the timeline, because AM 1 is in 2015 and if she's 6 in that, then she's not 18 until 2027, which is two years past when the movie is taking place in 2025. So if they really did mean to retcon her age, they messed it up pretty badly in the process. She needs to be 8 in 2015 to be 18 in 2025. Sigh. Oh well, it was still a great movie. So we just chalk it up as one more error that is annoying but in the end doesn't matter that much. Thanks so much for watching the vid and leaving your feedback. Really appreciate it!

[@canonblackwell1]

@@AbitofEverything4U I think the other thing to remember is that for a lot of the people working on these movies, they aren’t super fans like we are. It’s work for them and they probably get tired of people always asking them about things they think are not very important. And yes it would be nice for there to be a unified Timeline Keeper or Script Supervisor on set that’s able to say something like, “no the math doesn’t work out for her to be 6 at the end of 1, She had to be 7. Can we change that?” Because of course that doesn’t matter to the rest of the movie, just the continuity of the MCU as a whole. But it seems like either that isn’t how it goes throughout the production of these movies, or it is and those timeline people also make errors and let mistakes slip through the cracks.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yeah, very good points. But all I can say is if I was directing the third part of my trilogy, I would want internal dates to make sense. And since Cassie's age was a key factor in the new movie, I can't imagine not checking to see if we had given her an age in the earlier movies. Heck, I spent 5 minutes online, found the script, and did a word search on the word "year" and that's how I found the line about her being 10. Took like 5 minutes. So I just don't get not having enough pride in your work that you would double check your own movie. Again, it took me 5 minutes. Oh well, guess Peyton doesn't care that much. I mean he did say he throws the timeline "out the window". So to me, that says he just doesn't care at all. Sigh.

[@profbfc]

Were you a teacher before doing youtube? You have that empathetical and understanding tone of some teachers I had in school. Either way, looking forward to the book analysis!

[@AbitofEverything4U]

That's so nice of you to ask that. I never did full time teaching, but ever since middle school, I enjoyed leading study sessions and in college even did tutoring for fellow students on my own. I just love taking topics and unpacking them in creative ways that try to reach people that may be approaching things from different view points. I truly believe empathy is one of the most important things we can have in life. I work on being more empathic every day. Thanks for your feedback. I really appreciate it!

[@goodpotato1000]

The costume designer for Shang Chi spoke to my class a couple years ago and I asked her about changing the design of the ten rings to bracelets and she said that Kevin was very specific about that change and that it would influence things they hadn’t announced yet. At the time I thought it was eternals but now I think he was referring to kang

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Oh how cool! That's a great story. Thanks for sharing that. Yes, I think it's going to big time tie into Kang!

[@MrGeoff-iv6re]

I absolutely love all the work you do! I’m a big timeline guy myself so I was so stoked when I came across your channel! It’s so cool to see other people nerd out about the chronological events of their favorite franchises… I have created so many timelines from my favorites including the MCU, Star Wars, Assassin’s Creed and so many more! Keep up the great work!

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Glad to chat with another fellow timeline fan! I've always enjoyed trying to nail down the timelines for my favorite shows/movies, etc as it helps me visualize things so much better. Really appreciate your feedback on the video. I suspect you are eagerly awaiting the new MCU timeline book in September. Looks like it will be amazing!

[@Limitless_Pokemon]

Found this channel a few days ago. Your analysis on the MCU and easy tone of voice have made these videos some of the quickest 20 minutes ever!

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Thanks so much! Really appreciate the positive feedback. You nailed the exact tone I'm going for. Glad it works for you. Plus, I've been told it's a great way to cure insomnia, as it puts you to sleep when nothing else will! 😂

[@noy8940]

You’re one of my favorite channels I’ve found recently. You’re doing amazing work, friend. Kudos.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Thanks so much! Truly appreciate the positive support!

[@Lanosrep]

17:03 woldn't it make more sense to have that strand connect to Loki? Seeing as it is the finale of Loki which allows for this Kang variant to exist, and the sacred timeline imagery is referenced. Plus that post-credits scene!

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Good point! Yes, I guess that Loki should indeed connect to QM. I may move it over to the right side of the page in that case. Great suggestion!

[@captainjakemerica4579]

I thought this was Kang the Conqueror Prime who is here in this movie? Not another variant

[@realjohnlove]

11:33 Actually Feige wants us to buy the book and figuratively throw $50 out the window

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yep, that's what Peyton is saying. I hope Feige tells him to stop drinking before doing those interviews in the future...assuming Peyton has a future!

[@john_comi]

I really liked this movie. A strong start to phase 5, even if I think it's the weakest movie to start a phase so far (many will say Iron Man 3, but I love that movie lol). Kang and MODOK were great, End credits were great, it was a solid 7/10 for me. The VFX were a really rough in a few places imo, but that's okay. Regardless, into Gotg3, my most anticipated MCU film since 2017. So excited!!

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Great feedback. I think it gets a good solid 7/10 or 7.5/10 from me. I don't get the hate from the critics. And yes, very excited for GotG Vol 3!

[@diegoprodriguez]

I don’t know if it helps out, but I watched the movie and to answer the Cassie ‘Birthday’ situation at the end, Scott said that since he missed a few birthdays with Cassie, she deserved to have an extra. I really liked Kang and Janet in this movie. It was finally cool to see Michelle Pfeiffer play Janet and be the rouge fun to Hank’s more scientific nature. My only wish was that Hope got more to do this movie, and that the chemistry between Kathryn Newton and Paul Rudd can improve because not gonna lie, in comparison too Emma and Abby, I didn’t really feel that connection that’s been the core of the Ant-Man films.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Great point about the extra b-day party. I assume she had her birthday earlier in July and that this was indeed a chance to celebrate all the missed b-days. And I agree on all your comments about Kang (amazing), Janet (really got to shine), Hank (had a nice arc), Hope (underused), and Scott/Cassie (they just didn't have the same spark, but hoping it gets better over time). Thanks so much for watching the vid and leaving your feedback. Really appreciate it!

[@jhay4324]

Just left the theater a couple of hours ago, and I'm in agreement with you, on both counts. While I realize time isn't what you think it is, the writers were clearly incorrect. Also, this film was much better than L&T, which I didn't hate, but was just okay. My letter grades for the two are B-/C+ for L&T, and B+ for Quantumania. I really feel Q nailed the serious to humor ratio, something that was my biggest criticism of L&T. Great video!

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, I totally agree with your letter grades. And I also agree with the reasoning. The humor in L&T just didn't work, but in QM it was great. Excellent feedback!

[@aman7525]

As a longtime comic book fan I think that the continuity errors and age issues makes it more relatable. Character ages fluctuate all the time in a comic books you have to just let it go and enjoy it

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Definitely agree that the age error didn't alter my enjoyment of the movie. It was alot of fun and I don't get the critic ratings at all. Kang was amazing and will be a force to recon with thruout Phases 5 and 6. My issue with the age gaffe, however, is due to the fact that it was Peyton's own movie that he was contradicting, which is just plain lazy. There was no reason to retcon her to age 6 and 9, as she would be age 18 in QM if he had left it as is with her being ages 8 and 10. By changing her ages, he created the issue with QM now being in 2027. Plus, then he said they "throw the timeline out the window" at the same time Marvel wants us to drop $50 on a supposed official timeline book. So ultimately, I care about the timeline because Marvel said they care about the timeline. Thus, Peyton's is really mocking Marvel more than us. The same people that paid him to make the movie are the same people he's thumbing his nose at simply because he was too lazy to spend 5 minutes (that's all it took me) to research Cassie's actual age in the movies. Really just sad. But yes, loved the movie regardless of Peyton's drunken interview. Phase 5 has started off well and will only get better from here! Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@colin_cpr]

I agree so much with your rating of the movie. I would maybe even put it in the low 80s. Great video!

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yeah, I think the audience score is pretty spot on. Just so weird that the critics were so hard on it.

[@brandonfly4611]

I think its just cause from a critical standpoint the film isnt the best. It certainly has its flaws. I personally thought it was great, but each to their own I guess.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

@@brandonfly4611 Agreed. It seems the critics just were not impressed at all. But I liked it!

[@Kip-rp2jf]

I recently started watching your videos and was especially intrigued by the timeline ones. I had a thought about some of them however, and think it's an interesting thought experiment. In Shang Chi, Far From Home and Ms. Marvel, you state the errors in placing them due to real life celebrations not taking place where they should. My thoughts are that the blip caused these various events to be placed different in the MCU than the real world, like the Festival of Lights not taking place in October since maybe there were not enough people to justify doing it that month. Anyways, just a thought I had. Love the videos!

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, I think that makes alot of sense. The blip was a catastrophic event in the MCU and wasn't even a nice clean 5 years, but rather was around 5 1/2 years (May, 2018 to Oct, 2023), so I could definitely see that messing up the timing of some of the festivals since they probably didn't celebrate them during the blip. Excellent feedback! Thanks so much for watching the vids and sharing your thoughts on the timeline. Really appreciate it!

[@quintessences]

Thinking about it more, I think it would’ve been better if Peyton Reed didn’t say anything about Cassie being 18 in this movie. Because had that been left ambiguous she could be whatever age matches the actual timeline of events. By saying she’s 18 in the movie explicitly creates issues.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, good point. I think Peyton should have left well enough alone and not said anything. However, he actually was correct that if the movie is in 2025 after her b-day in July, then she is 18. His screw up was he didn't look at his earlier movies to get her age right in those. He made up age 6 and age 9, when neither were correct. Heck, AM&TW even specifically said she's 10, so how he can't remember his own movie is beyond me. Sigh. Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@herb4243]

It’s really painful to see someone at marvel not care about the timeline… For a company as big as Marvel, I expect them to know exactly what they are doing!

[@AbitofEverything4U]

I completely agree that I would have expected Marvel to pay more attention to details like Cassie's age. Peyton's quote about the timeline was very surprising. I personally think he was just trying to excuse his mistake and that he wasn't speaking for Marvel as a whole. But it was a very disappointing thing for him to say. Hopefully the timeline book will shed some light on things when it comes out in September. Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@Volvagia0slayer]

Haha, great video. Yeah, I'm of the mind that Quantumania happens in July 2025, and Cassie (and Peyton Reed) are simply wrong about her age in Ant-Man. But it's quotes like these that have got me skeptical about this timeline book (or at least made me feel validated about my skepticism, haha).

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yep, agree on all points. My hope is that Peyton just got lazy and didn't do his homework and now he's covering for himself by saying the timeline gets "thrown out the window". I suspect Uncle Feige didn't appreciate that quote. And I suspect Peyton was speaking for himself. At least I hope so! Great comments as always!

[@jrickclark]

Great video, but at one point, you said that you didn’t understand the Rotten Tomatoes rating of 48%. I think you are correct that you don’t understand it. The RT score is only the percentage of positive reviews, not an average of the ratings. So 48% does not mean that the average rating was 48%. 48% means that on average, 48% of the reviewers gave it a positive review (60+ points on a 100 point scale). To put it another way, a film that receives 48% of the reviews as 5 stars, and 52% as 2 stars, would get the same RT score (48%) as a film that receives 48% of the review as 3 stars and 52% as 1 star. I hope I’m explaining that clearly, and that maybe it helps a bit. Thanks again for a great video. I think you’re spot-on with your analysis!

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Wow, that's a great explanation of the RT scoring system. Thanks! Yeah, I should done a better job of explaining my response to the RT score. I'm down with the rating logic RT is using to determine the overall score, I was more just surprised that QM ended up with a score so low in comparison to other MCU movies as well as other comic movies in general. It wasn't my favorite MCU movie or even top 10, but I think several other MCU movies would rank lower so I was just surprised that it received an RT score beneath movies like Incredible Hulk, Iron Man 2, Dark World and Love and Thunder, as a few examples. But I guess the box office does seem to reflect a lower score, as it turns out. Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@loferx]

Peyton Reed sounded almost mad with the interviewer for asking about the timeline.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

I agree! Personally, I think he knows he messed up Cassie's age and he's trying to cover for his mistake. I did reach out to him on twitter a few weeks back, but got no response. Gunn would have responded, as he's super active on twitter, but I bet Reed saw it and ignored it. He messed up and so now he's like, "we throw the timeline out the window all the time". Sure, Peyton, sure. Feige needs to have a talk with that dude! Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@MikkelCramer]

Will you do a video about the different Kangs we've now seen, the ones you hope to see, the likely ones to come and etc.?

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Great idea! Yes, I think a "who are all these Kangs" vid would be fun. There were a ton of Kangs in those end credit scenes. So that's a very fun vid idea. Excellent suggestion!

[@withyline]

6:50 This guy should be a professional actor. P.S. I can’t believe Payton Manning would do something so despicable.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, that Peyton Manning knows how to call the sneak plays, eh?

[@captainspike1913]

Can someone shed light on the podcast thing? The way the podcast title is phrased, it sounds like he is being interviewed, not the interviewer. But mostly everyone keeps saying that it's his podcast

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Great question. I should have explained that more fully. This Powered Life is a podcast series that details the lives of famous enhanced individuals such as the Avengers. This Powered Life released an interview with Scott Lang, titled Big Me Little Me: A Scott Lang Interview, in which he detailed his life as Ant-Man and his experience with the Avengers, such as Captain Marvel. So you are correct, he is being interviewed and it isn't his podcast. Hope that helps. Thanks so much for watching the vid and leaving your feedback. Really appreciate it!

[@Loosetext]

Great video!!! I agree and I would actually give it a 9 out of 10. It was Antman meets Strange World meets Star Wars lol

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, it was a far better movie than the critics give it credit for. Really enjoyed it!

[@amf0078]

I love you videos dude, keep it up. And I really liked Quantumania a lot, I can’t wait for more.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, I think the critics were overly harsh with QM and that it was alot better than the reviews pegged it. I'm super stoked for the multiverse saga...so many great stories ahead in Phase 5 and 6! Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@bryh555]

Don't forget, Rotton Tomatoes critics also rated Home Alone 2: Lost in New York as a worse movie than Home Alone 3

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Oh my! I had forgotten about that. Wow, that's hard to fathom!

[@bluebellsforever]

​@@AbitofEverything4Uboth kinda suck and the original is obviously the better movie !

[@realjohnlove]

19:22 I was thinking this, he may have been pulled into another dimension & stranded again. The other Kang’s say he died

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Right...I really think we'll see this Kang return and be even more powerful. Should be interesting to see what Marvel has planned!

[@realjohnlove]

@@AbitofEverything4U We also saw a million other Kangs tho. He Who Remains isolated his timeline Quantum Kang attempted to just straight up purge all the timelines of Kang’s who would cause the multiversal war. Then theres the Kang’s in other universes. I wonder if we’ll see any good benevolent versions of Kang

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Could be. Iron Lad is supposed to be a good guy, but I've never read the comics with him in it.

[@realjohnlove]

@@AbitofEverything4U The initial Young Avengers series when they become a team is a great start HOWEVER My theory is Ironheart/Riri Williams will be revealed to be a Kang variant & we may not get Iron Lad at all and they’ll just substitute Nathaniel with Riri

[@AbitofEverything4U]

@@realjohnlove Good theories!

[@owalterluan]

I feel your pain, man And I agree 100% with your ratings and personal opinions on the movie Really good job, nice video, +1 subscriber I still think about the "8 years later" every night before sleep lmao

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Thanks so much for the positive feedback and the sub. And yeah, that "8 years later" is the stuff of nightmares. Yikes!

[@AlienIOIandroktone]

I think you could compromise and have it be that Cassie is 6 but turns 7 during Ant Man in 2015 (if she literally just turned 7, Cass messing it up and saying she was 6 is only a few days off), 9 but only a couple months off turning 10 in Ant Man 2 (If Scott was talking to Cassie he'd obviously know to be specific, but conversationally to other adults, he rounds up), 15 in Endgame late 2023, then has just turned 17 in Quantumania and you can still place it in 2025 (close enough where the "becoming an adult" theme still applies, and Peyton is just slightly off) Maybe I've not gotten the timeline exact and there's something I've missed that doesn't make it possible, but I think it works if they went with that. I don't put much weight into the director statements (especially after the recent one), or the characters' conversational mentions of age 6 and 10 referencing Cassie in 2015 and 2018 respectively.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yeah, I've tried to run the numbers to make it work, but I just think Peyton was wrong. Here's why I think that: - Ant Man 1 (July - Aug, 2015): Let's say she starts and 6 and is 7 when she's attacked. And then in QM, she just says 6 by accident. - Ant Man & The Wasp (Apr - May, 2018): She would be 9 - End game (Oct, 2023): She would be 15 - Quantumania (July, 2025): She would be 17 instead of 18 (she'd turn 18 in 2026) So she's too young in QM and it means that Scott was wrong in AM&TW. I just think the issue is Peyton didn't do the math. It's very disappointing, but oh well, I still enjoyed the movie, so that's good. Anyway, I really appreciate you watching the vid and sharing your ideas. Thanks so much for doing that!

[@drasvader1]

That's what I think.she was 6 and turned seven.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

@@drasvader1 Could be, but the issue is even if she's 7 in Ant-Man, that movie takes place in 2015. And if she's 18 in QM, then that movie has to take place in 2026, which I suspect isn't the case. I just don't think the math works unless she's 8 in Ant-Man, which was how she was originally intended to be, seeing as how she was originally 10 in AT&TW. Darn that Peyton!

[@mahnameisj]

Would it be possible that when Scott was saying Cassie was 10, it meant that she was turning 10? Like she’s still nine but with her birthday only like a month or two away Scott is under the foregone conclusion that she is basically a ten year old? It doesn’t help the 6 year old line but it’s closer 🧐

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Well, I guess Scott could be advancing her age by a few months. But I can only say I never did that with my son. His age is his age, and no reason to call him something other than he is. Plus, why would Peyton say a different age in his interview than the script had it in it? Just so weird. But regardless, that six year old line is just so painful. Ugh. Hope they fix it when it comes to D+. Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@mahnameisj]

@@AbitofEverything4U yeah this whole thing that Peyton Reed has done is very confusing. But to be devil’s advocate for a sec, what if Peyton was indeed wrong with the details but not with the age 9 and 6? What if he was wrong that Cassie turns 18 instead? I’m just spiralling into conspiracy levels here trying to make sense of it but it’s nice to have people to bounce ideas with 😂

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Considering that Peyton finished his quote by saying the timeline "is thrown out the window", I suspect that nothing he said makes much sense. But to your point, if he wants to retcon Cassie to be 6 in Ant Man1 and 9 in AM&TW, then she'd be 16 in 2025. Kathryn Newton definitely doesn't look 16 and I don't suspect he meant for her to be that young. So basically, Peyton made no sense at all, as far as I can tell. I'd rather assume she was 8 in AM1, 10 in AM&TW (which was stated in the movie) and 18 in QM. That makes the most sense with what was already stated in the movies and with what I believe was the intent with QM. Just so frustrating that something so simple is such a mess. Sigh.

[@victornjensen]

Watched Quantumania today, don’t understand the critics either, I loved it.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yeah, I just don't get it. Not sure if the critics all just got together and decided to dump on the movie? So bizarre. But I'm glad you liked it. I'd give it a solid 7.5 - 8/10 for sure!

[@christopherlee8989]

Scott actually says that he's just making up for the birthdays he missed. Cassius said "it's not my birthday" scott immediately replies with "I know I missed a few"

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, excellent point. I think that b-day party at the end of the movie was perhaps a month after they got out of the QR, since Scott was pretty badly beaten up in the movie. So after he healed up, Scott decided to make up for the missed birthdays with another impromptu party. That's my theory at least. Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@DecoyZ]

I watched Quantumania on the 17th, I loved it! I think it was really cool. It wasn't perfect and there are some things I wished they did different, but that doesn't ruin a movie for me. A movie can have flaws and I still enjoy it. For me its definitely an 84/100 for me, loved it, it was so flashy and cool! Kang was fantastic, he's probably my favourite marvel villain ever. I actually have a collaborative writing project, kinda like the MCU, where all my friends write stories in the same universe as eachother and trust me, the job of timekeeper got so incredibly difficult we just threw it away. It's a personal project, so we have more leeway of mistakes, but trust me when I say forgetting stuff like this happens all. the. time with us Every few weeks someone will realise "Actually this age doesn't line up with this and this doesn't line up with that" and we just have to say "Dammit" and move on hehe.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

I agree, Quantumania was great. I'd give it a 7.5/10 or 8/10 for sure. It may even go up on second viewing. I don't get the critics complaining about it, myself. Kang was amazing and I can't wait to see him return in Phase 5 and 6. And on Cassie's age, I'm totally with you that it's hard to avoid making mistakes. What I guess really shocks me this time around is that Peyton directed all 3 movies. And it took me 5 minutes to do a search on the online script and locate the 10 year old age given in AM&TW. I just don't see how Peyton messed that up so bad. Plus, the math puts QM in 2027 if she's 6 in AM1. Ugh. And then he finished off by saying the timeline is "thrown out the window" yet they want us to drop $50 on a definitive timeline book? Put all that together and it's just shocking. Oh well, still a fantastic movie. Glad you enjoyed it as well. Thanks for watching the vid and leaving your feedback. Really appreciate it!

[@DecoyZ]

@@AbitofEverything4U Yeah I really don't get the critics, to each their own but some of the big complaints I just didn't see to be honest. I pay more attention to audience scores anyways, although I've been trying to not let online scores effect me and my thought process about films too much. I know, it's confusing, I think what's going on is the timekeeper isn't really communicating with anyone? Maybe? I don't know.. and yeah the fact he directed the films only to then forget a specific line.. I can't help but feel like maybe they were talking about the actresses age? I don't know how old she was but I could believe the original cassie actress was 6 at the time of filming. Idk, a little confusing, there are a few lines in this film like that. and yeah I agree! Amazing film, Kang was so damn good! I wish we just saw MORE of him hehe, which is a good sign, the post credit scenes were awesome, set design was so cool, MODOK was funny and pretty entertaining although I hope they pull another "He's not actually dead" cause I'd love to see him become a recurring bad guy. Can't wait for the rest of Phase 5! And no problem! I love your content, so glad I found your channel

[@AbitofEverything4U]

You do raise a good point about the actresses age. Abby was indeed 6 1/2 when Ant Man 1 was filmed. Still can't believe Peyton made his mistake, but that could be the genesis of it. And thanks for the kind words about the channel. Really appreciate it!

[@samrameker2753]

The reason for the low score is because so many people are right in the middle with basically half going barely positive and half going barely negative so very few people hated it but few loved it.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yeah, I think you laid out a good explanation of how the RT score ended up, but it's still weird in comparison to some of the lessor entries in the MCU (i.e.. IM2, Incredible Hulk, Thor: TDW, Thor: L&T, etc). I don't think it was 20 points worse than those movies, so I can't figure out why more critics liked those (esp. L&T, ugh). But oh well, it was a fun movie and I sure liked it. So the critics gonna critic, I guess. Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@RavenFlag]

I liked the movie, but I think it was all over the place. 1 & 2 were heists and 3 had the potential to be. With Kang having an important thing (the ball) and our heros needing it. Also, we always had the parallel that Janet lost time with her daughter and Scott Lost time with his daughter. In this movie Janet got the offert to get the time back. I think they should have explored Scott's offer more. Time with their kids is such an important thing for parents, i don't see how they benefitted from changing it to a vague : trust my daughter. Motive

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Great commentary! Yes, it did seem like QM was going to be a heist movie, but they didn't go far enough with it. And I also feel we could have had even more time between Cassie and Scott. I wish they would allow the movies to breathe and would let them be over 2 hours if needed. An extra 10-15 min would have really helped their relationship continue to develop. Excellent feedback as always!

[@Darkuwa]

Scott and Hope not getting stuck at the end makes me feel like young avengers isn't happening

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Interesting! Yes, it did seem like they changed the ending at the last minute. I hope that's not due to a delay in Young Avengers, but I admit I don't know why they did it, so you could very well be right. Would be a bummer if that's the reason. Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@droupscoup3541]

I love Modok in this movie. Well up until the end where i think his death was ridiculous.

[@droupscoup3541]

Will you make a video of the marvel delays? And/or a video on your speculation of when each announced series will released

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yeah, MODOK's death was a little rushed, although I was okay with it in the end. There wasn't any future for his character, per se. But it was rushed. As for a video on the delays, I should probably do that. It's been crazy how fast things have been changing, so I suspect as soon as I make a vid on it, it will change again. But I do agree it's a good idea. Thanks for the suggestion!

[@droupscoup3541]

@@AbitofEverything4U not only was his death rushed, i feel like his change of heart was too. Wished he was handled better there. I do have to respectfully disagree about him not having a future. I could sdd him being a good villain for a team of younger heros. Maybe Cassie along with Kate and the others. Oh yes there is a new change every week when it comes to releases so i understand if you cant be constantly making a video about evrry single change.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Good point...perhaps there was a future for MODOK. Marvel does have the issue of killing off all their villains, so they need to address that for sure!

[@RikLord79]

A very good explanation to the whole Cassie age thing could be that she is 9 in 2018 and 18 in 2026. What reed said could be right. I have a dad and he is always missing my age and my sisters by one or two years.same thing goes with my grandparents even if we are really close. So I think that the expression 10 year old could work for anybody between the ages of 8 to 11. 9 and a half is in that area. So then it can confirm what reed said about her being 9. An explanation to why he said that Cassie was 6 could be that she turned 7 since it was 2 and a half years or something prior to any man 2 but instead of considering the day that she turned 7 maybe he said 6 because he was thinking prior to her actual date of birth or something. It would be still wrong but it kinda works. Then of course though there’s Cassie’s age in 2025/2026. The reasonable thing to do, if listening to reed (hopefully not drunk reed), is to put her 18th birthday in 2026. That contradicts Nate Moore’s statement but I he was the same guy who practically said that he didn’t know what he was talking about. I don’t know. It’s caos.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yeah, I think we'll have a better idea when QM shows up on the D+ timeline, but I will be shocked if it isn't located in 2025 (probably placed between She-Hulk and Ms. Marvel). I can't imagine that it's happening in 2026. Also, regarding Ant-Man, Cassie already had her birthday at the beginning of the movie, so when she was attacked, she would be her new age after her b-day. So if she was 6 at that point, she'd really be 18 in 2027. Reed is just wrong. He has to be. Well, drunk and wrong. 🤣 Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@RikLord79]

@@AbitofEverything4U yeah it’s just weird. Like you said let’s wait for Disney plus.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Totally agree!

[@realjohnlove]

8:04 if she was 6 in 2015 + 2018 she was 9. Its possible because she would still turn 10 in 2018 (maybe) Thats a hard one to fit the age 10 in. Its possible Scott just rounded up My parents keep adding 1-2 years to my age when I’m not that old. They kept saying I was 30 from 27-29

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Personally, I'd go with Cassie forgot her age when she was a kid rather that Scott forgot her age as a father. I would never give a wrong age for my son, at least when he's that young. I can understand rounding 27-29 up to 30, though. So your parents made sense. Scott would not do that when lost time with Cassie was so important to him.

[@MKnowS]

This was a great video! I agree on the quality, I didn't think it was great but I really liked Ant Man 3 and didn't much care for Ant Man 2. I don't normally act so strictly on timeline (my watch order is based on creating thematic arcs) but the timeline is fascinating!

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, I agree, I think QM was enjoyable and I liked it better than AM&TW. And I'm with you that viewing order is a matter of preference, but it's always nice to know the timeline so you can see where things fit into the bigger picture as you watch something. Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@julianortiz5712]

I really liked the movie, and don't get the RT score AT ALL. Kang was fantastic and I can't wait to see what Loki Season 2 is teasing. It's a shame not even Peyton Reed knows where on the timeline it fits, but that doesn't really affect my enjoyment of the movie. Great video, thanks for covering it!

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yeah, I just don't understand the RT score. Very good movie. Not in the top 10 on my overall MCU list, but still very good. And it made me all the more excited to see where Kang pops up next. And I agree, Peyton's gaffe really bugs me, but it doesn't impact the movie for me. Great comments as always!

[@Merione]

I just watched the movie yesterday, so I'm now catching up on your videos. I believe Kang did die in the end. Or at least THIS variant of Kang died. The thing about Kang is that there are a million versions of him around the Multiverse, all extremely powerful. In this movie they're even explaining that the reason why this Kang was in the Quantum Realm to begin with is that he was defeated and exiled Realm by the other Kangs when he tried to fight them, so it's implied that this Kang is among the weakest of them! I'm genuinely excited to see how this new story will play out!

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, there's no doubt that predicting anything in regards to the Multiverse Saga will be very difficult. The only reason I think this Kang survived is it would be abit odd for Marvel to kill off a Kang so quickly. Plus, going into that multiversal engine doesn't seem like it would kill him but would instead making him infinitely more powerful. But that said, your theory makes very good sense, too. Gonna be alot of fun watching to see how the Multiverse Saga continues to unfold in the months to come!

[@legodude146]

Realistically it’s probably an error in the script, but I think another way to rationalize it would be that Scott rounded up in Ant Man & The Wasp.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yeah, I could definitely see that Scott rounded up her age in AM&TW. Granted, as a father myself I can't imagine rounding up my son's age, but everyone is different and I bet some parents do that. However, the biggest issue is that if she's 6 in Ant-Man, which is in 2015, then she'd be 18 in 2027, which means Quantumania is 2 years in the future of the current MCU, which is in 2025. So I think Peyton is just confused. Maybe the timeline book will answer it once and for all. Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@Lanosrep]

13:15 Spider-Man Homecoming was written by writers hired by Marvel Studios, not Sony. And Jon Watts specifically said that he chose that 8 years later date based on advice from MARVEL, not Sony. Of course we now know that date to be wrong, but we can't pin the timeline inaccuracies on Sony for a film that Marvel wrote, and filmed, when sony only distributed it.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Oh, now that's a good point. Okay, then perhaps the 8 years later issue is indeed as bad as this age 6 gaffe. It's just that in this case, the same guy literally directed all three movies and he couldn't take the time to read the script from AM&TW to see she was 10 in that movie. Heck, I found it by doing a search on the online script. Like it was so easy to avoid this error. Ugh!

[@Adamdahlinmusic]

Just throwing out a theory lvl 3000 here. But what if the age error line in the car was intentional because Cassie.... Has been swapped by a Skrull?? Skrulls don´t always get personal info from the past correct (like talos being okay being called Nick instead of Fury) and yeah scott was just being a nice dad and didnt wanna correct her. Now I dont think this is happening but would be a fun surprising twist for sure

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yeah, with Secret Invasion coming right around the corner, I suspect anything is possible for Skrull impersonation. Can't wait for that series to come out. Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@josinfleurs]

10:50 - God, that gave me anxiety, Lord please help us

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, that quote might be one of the worst I've ever seen from a director in an interview. My word, Peyton. Like really?

[@MegaRayquaza260]

Yeah this movie is certainly a much easier one to place in the timeline compared to ones of late. I have no clue what Peyton Reed was on about in that interview and I take Cassie's line as just a relative age and not something exact.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Agreed, I think they are making the movies easier to place and I hope that's thanks to the efforts of the timeline keeper. And I look at Cassie's line as a relative age. I think Peyton knew he messed up and tried to throw the timeline under the bus in that interview when in reality he just did sloppy work. Sigh. Great feedback as always!

[@dellcoc]

It has to be 2027 since Cassie stated that she was 6 in 2015. Reed stated that she is 18 in this.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Granted, at this point anything is possible, but I can't imagine Ant-Man being 2 years in the future (i.e. 2027) when the rest of the MCU is in 2025. I think Reed was correct that she's 18 in the movie, but incorrect that she was 6 in Ant-Man. Her stated age of 10 in AM&TW actually works perfectly with her being 18 in 2025. So I think they got Cassie's age confused with the actress (who was 6 1/2 when Ant-Man was filmed) and thus they messed up the line. Considering that Reed said the timeline is "thrown out the window", I think he knew he messed up and was trying to cover it up. Maybe when the timeline book comes out in September we'll know for sure. Just my take on it though. Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@dellcoc]

@@AbitofEverything4U So you are saying the director doesn't know his own movies?

[@AbitofEverything4U]

@@dellcoc Yeah, it's just so weird to me that he directed them all, and yet doesn't know what was in them. Plus, I spent like 5 minutes searching for an online script and then searching for the word "year" to find the 10-years old quote in AM&TW. Like someone couldn't have spent 5 minutes doing the same thing? Sigh. Oh well, still a good movie, so there's that!

[@dellcoc]

@@AbitofEverything4U After watching some other interviews, I am 100% convinced Reed is a total idiot. I am not happy with Watts doing Fantastic 4 either. He caused the 8 Years Later embarrassment.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

@@dellcoc Yeah, Reed has really not impressed me. I think he did a decent job overall in directing the movies, but his attention to detail, as well as his interviewing skills, are terrible. Hope this is the last thing he does.

[@QuynhNguyen-gp4ti]

There are 3 things about Quantumania that I concluded after watching both the movies and your video: - Kang is so freaking good, he may even dethrone Thanos in the future! - Cassie frustrated me a bit, especially Kathryn Newton's performance doesn't help her shine either. Also her intellect level is weird because in the comics, intelligence isn't one of her forte, but she could make a device to enter the quantum realm herself? There are only 3 certified child/young genius in the MCU that is consistent with the comics and those are Shuri, Peter Parker and Riri Williams. We never have any evidence that Cassie is super genius (she isn't even related to the Pyms/van Dynes) and bam she made a quantum realm device and the Stature suit herself? What? (Also after watching the movie I think I prefer Emma Fuhrmann as Cassie) - Peyton Reed can't do math and we all (us and MCU) suffer.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Wow, excellent commentary. I agree, Kang is amazing. Can't wait for him to take over Phase 5 and 6. And you are so right about Cassie. I hadn't considered it before now, but it doesn't make any sense that she created that device. It did seem Hank helped her, but still. Great catch on that. And yeah, Peyton is just lazy and didn't do any research on his own movies. Just astounding. Thanks so much for watching the vid and leaving your feedback. Really appreciate it!

[@yandhi5849]

16:00 I think that is just a made-up story her make because how did mrs marvel know that scott and hope go on vacation and the full story?

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, it very well could be a made up story. But that said, Scott and Hope are big time celebrities in Quantumania so I would suspect if they vacationed somewhere, then everyone would know. Just like we know when famous movies stars go on vacation IRL. So it's hard to say, I guess. But you certainly could be right.

[@FranciscoRamirez-nb4uu]

Great video. I personally enjoyed the movie and the villains, I think they were consistently good through the movie, my only problem with them is their last scenes/parts Spoilers if you didn't watch the movie . . . . . . . . MODOK had a very rushed redemption, the whole movie was taunting or killing people, but then just because Cassie told him something he bacame good in the last moment and call Scott a brother, I guess we have to assume he is crazy (the avenger joke was funny unlike the brother one) Kang, he was show as a threat in the movie, but "Kang the Conqueror" is suppose to be the main Kang and the main villain of not just the phase, the saga. And the fact that he was "killed" by Antman and co. kills a lot of tension for future movies, because if they can defeat him when the stakes are lower why wouldn't all the Avengers defeat him when the stakes are higher? I say this cause in this movie his whole motivation is to escape, after that he is going to fight other Kangs so he isn't an immadiate threat to 616, Marvel Studios could have him winning here an just defeat him later when he tries to conquer/destroy 616, that way you solidly establish him as a villain and threat. What is worse is that one of the trailers created controversy for showing to much, one of the scenes was from the final fight were Scott says "we both have to lose" but that dialogue ments nothing cause the good guys win 100%, Kang is sent to a probability world or whatever, Scott survives and even returns home safely with Hope. An storm is forming, yeah but that is tomorrow, today they won. One more thing for Kang, they nerfed him without shame during the battle, he was desintegrating people easily untill the protagonist appear, and there's no explanation of why he couldn't desintegrate them like the rest, seriously this movie aimed so hard to the simplistic happy ending. About Hope, all I can say is that I liked the moments of her and Scott, that being said I thing the movie should be Antman and Stinger/Stature Quantumania cause they focused more on Scott and Cassie and Hope barely had anything to do aside from figthing

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Wow, that was some excellent commentary. I agree with all of your concerns. I was particularly surprised that Kang didn't blast Ant-Man and the gang when they showed up, since he had been doing that moments ago. That was weird and contrived. But overall I did like it and would probably give it a solid 7.5/10. Not perfect, but not terrible. Was just a fun two hours. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Great comments as always!

[@FranciscoRamirez-nb4uu]

@@AbitofEverything4U yeah I don't think it was terrible like some people say but it's really far from being perfect. Well I want to see what you have to tell of the postcredit scenes and the Loki connection in your next video

[@AbitofEverything4U]

I agree...far from perfect indeed. I enjoyed it, but not top tier by any means. And yes, the next video should be fun. Still working on it, but hopefully won't be too long from now.

[@tdog2658]

You should do a video called "Where do the Marvel Television shows take place in the MCU timeline?"

[@AbitofEverything4U]

I do indeed need to cover the pre-D+ shows, such as Netflix and Agents of Shield. Great suggestion!

[@hanksimp9729]

@@AbitofEverything4U I also have an idea I was wondering could you explain the difference between alternate timeline and alternate universe when it comes to the MCU. DC and other media know their is a difference while I think MCU is trying to say they are the same. I even watched this, you should watch it: kzbin.info/www/bejne/kHPTh6RolJ5pn9E

[@AbitofEverything4U]

@@hanksimp9729 I watched that video, but I guess i don't understand his issue with timelines and universes being the same. I did a video on time travel here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/bJinZIGLrMdpr7M. If you haven't seen it, you might check it out as it addresses most of the concerns in his video. I am also doing a second QM video that goes into how Loki and QM work together in the overall story. That will touch on a few of his concerns as well. But let me know what you think about the time travel video. I'd love your feedback!

[@nowonspecial]

I know you have your ranking for every individual movie. But what’s your ranking for a character film series. Like example if you put Cap’s movies together like first avenger, winter soldier and civil war or spider man’s homecoming, far from home and no way home. Which film series is your favorite( excluding the avenger’s movies)?

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Great question! I may well do a video on that type of ranking, as I think it's a fun way to view the MCU. Excellent suggestion! Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. I really appreciate it!

[@AbitofEverything4U]

My gut feeling at this point is the Captain America movies, which is surprising since Spidey is my favorite hero. But the CA movies are so rewatchable that I suspect they will come out on top. But I need to think about it some more.

[@nowonspecial]

@@AbitofEverything4U I agree. For me Captain America. Second Spider- man, then Iron man.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Nice!

[@josinfleurs]

13:32 - That "anyway" sounded more like "I wanna kill Peyton Reed" 😂

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Give me 5 minutes with Peyton Reed...just 5 minutes. I wanna talk to that dude!

[@MatthewK122]

I really hope Modok returns to mcu as villain

[@AbitofEverything4U]

MODOK was great! Love to have him return if it's possible. But if not, I enjoyed every aspect of him in the movie. I knew I would love Kang (and he was amazing), but I wasn't sure how I'd feel about MODOK. So he was actually the most pleasant surprise for me!

[@zoomkilla6132]

Are you drunk with the Peyton Manning line? lol he definitely had one too many for him to say the timeline gets thrown out the window but great video as always!

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yeah, I sure sounded like I had a few too many when I mentioned Peyton Manning. Granted, he's one of my favorite QB's, but yeah, that was pretty funny. And I just don't get Reed. Such a bizarre quote. Wonder if Feige gave him a call after that interview? Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@amazinc754]

Is it possible that there's one Kang that created all that tech we see throughout these movies?

[@AbitofEverything4U]

That could be the case. I am actually working on a video that discusses all of the variants and how they all relate to each other. Hope to have it out tomorrow. Will be interesting to see where Marvel takes things from here! Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@maunglay8833]

I’m putting it Top 8. Might readjust, but it’s definitely a Top 10, for me. The movie worked for me. The previous two Ant-Man movies did not. Most everything in Quantumania worked, for me. That includes MODOK! surprisingly. I was never a fan of MODOK, as a character from anywhere, but here I love the portrayal. I could have done it without a joke or two in like one scene of the whole movie but there’s wasn’t like an entire scene in which I was like “ahh really? No….Again?”. I’ll say, the running joke with MODOK worked better for me in this movie than it did with Mjolnir in Love and Thunder (still major bummers with that movie as a whole) anyway here, I laughs each time. It just work. Obviously Kang(s). I mean. Yea. He Who Remains, he was okay but Kang..dude. Yep if he really is going to be the Big Bad, I believe it now. Johnathan Majors. Just major props. I can’t wait to see what else he has in store for more variants of Kang. Rest of the casts, I mean I like them. I do enjoy Cassie and Scott Father-daughter relationship a lot more. Our “newest” Young Avenger candidate. She wasn’t “new”, we met her way back but she just got her power so technically the “newest”. Here’s an idea. Thinking back to Multiverse of Madness, the Illuminati of Earth 838 say the cause of the Incursions were Dreamwalking. Did you catch what Kang said in this movie? He’s got his own idea. He believes the cause of the Incursions were his variants meddling with time itself. He saw the Multiverse and it was dying. He tried to took control, so he started a war but he got exiled to Quantum Realm. I bet you, we will meet more characters who will have their own theory, I bet even different Kang will have different theories as to the cause of it. Just like from the comic, if you know, you know, only until certain some meet this certain someone, everything will get explain. For the love of all things, I really really hope we go there. That said, loves Quantumania, can’t wait to where we go from here!

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Great feedback. Love your theories. Enjoyed reading them all. I agree, this movie got me stoked for Kang. Can't wait to see what happens next. Phase 5 and 6 are gonna be amazing!

[@serpentlord1312]

So you know how a lot of people think Marvel are gonna reset everything after Secret Wars? Yeah I really hope they don’t do that and I’ve found a quote somebody said regarding this form of story telling Quote: Stories where the world ends and a new one is created are trash. It makes all the struggle to save the old world pointless. I have no connection to this new world and thus no reason to be satisfied by it. This basically sums up why I don’t want them to reset after Secret Wars.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

I totally agree. I'm down for a soft reboot (such as they did in Secret Wars 2015), but not a hard reboot. If you haven't seen it, I discuss that in depth in this vid: kzbin.info/www/bejne/pqLIdIN8qt5oiaM. Great comments as always. Thanks for watching!

[@realjohnlove]

“Well you weren’t 6, you were 8” lmfao

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Scott needed to say it. Sometimes ya gotta correct your kids!

[@bluebellsforever]

​@@AbitofEverything4Umaybe he also forgot

[@jonahnichols1]

I've said it before and I'll say it again, you need to be hired to be the official Marvel Studios timekeeper!

[@AbitofEverything4U]

I'd do it for free. Heck, I'd pay them. Please Marvel, call me!

[@realjohnlove]

17:09 It was too weird for critics & general audiences. It lacked the realism edge most MCU films have because that was their niche. Bring superheroes to our world. Iron Man is “What If Iron Man Existed in the Real World” thats why it was a hit. Its taking from the influence of Chris Nolan’s The Dark Knight. The “how would this be possible” Quantumania defies this premise. Where the first 2 Ant-man films had a lot of realistic application, this film doesn’t. The Quantum Realm didn’t feel believable. I liked the film but the reason the MCU is successful because it forced audiences to suspend disbelief by trying to make it applicable in our reality its one of the reasons some ppl prefer Marvel over DC. No made up cities, Spider-man is swinging in NYC & people can relate to it. You can arguably say Raimi Spider-man went along these lines Overall Quantumania was super nerd x9000 its probably the most comic book MCU film

[@AbitofEverything4U]

That's excellent commentary. You are right, in general, Marvel has tried to take the comic world and make it realistic. This was full comic weirdness to the extreme. I can see why critics didn't like it, if that was their reasoning. That's the best explanation I've heard in fact.

[@floatingsky]

what if "QUANTUMANIA" is not happening on our 616 timeline -just a thought

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Now that would be wild. I guess we have to assume Marvel might pull that trick on us at some point. I'll keep that in mind. Excellent commentary! Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@betterthanstarlight]

In all honestly, the weakest part of this movie for me was cassie. They start with a fantastic idea and pretty much drop it by the end. There was no payoff to him teaching her the grow/punch thing where she gets it right, her dad is potentially stranded and she calmly goes “dad!” It just didnt fill into the movie well, another 5 or 10 minutes of screen time on that plot line and it would knock this movie up the ranking by a LOT. Also, wasp was AWESOME in this movie!

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, I agree that the ending needed abit more to it. I think they cut it down to hit a 2 hour time frame, but Marvel needs to be willing to let the movies breathe abit. A 2 hour 15 minute movie is just fine in length. And I agree, Wasp was awesome in the movie. I should have mentioned that. Thanks so much for watching the vid and leaving your feedback. Really appreciate it!

[@realjohnlove]

13:38 Goes back to me saying the films main core events could occur after Eternals & No Way Home but theres parts that could occur before or simultaneously

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yeah, could be that a part of the movie happens simultaneously with Eternals and NWH. I suspect it is more in the July timeframe of 2025, but we'll have to see what D+ does with the placement as well as whether the infamous timeline book helps shed light on it.

[@realjohnlove]

@@AbitofEverything4U you already know my feelings about Disney+ its like how Doctor Strange (2016) starts before Civil War but ends well after Civil War. I think a lot of MCU films have that as well.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, it's just so hard to place stuff on a timeline when the entries span several months. Hoping the timeline book solves it for us!

[@realjohnlove]

8:30 The Age 6 is a retcon and we have to deal with it.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

No, I think the age 6 is an error. Because if 6 is a retcon, then they also retconned AM&TW (where she's 10) and put QM in 2027. That's just too crazy for me, so I assume Peyton was just drunk and Cassie just forgot her age.

[@charlesjacques1960]

I don't understand why they recreated darren's face in 3d when they could've juste stretch it on the 3d model. I personally tought thought the movie was okay, it has plenty of elements that did not work together, like kang and modok working together and the creatures of the quantumn realm were really weird. It did have some good dramatic writing at some places but at the end of the day i just found it was really wack

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yeah, MODOK was a mess, but I guess I liked that, since he's a mess of a character in general. Really just cracked me up. You are right, though, it is a wack movie overall. But I think it was supposed to be like the Wizard of Oz and, well, that movie is kinda wack, too, I guess. Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@charlesjacques1960]

@@AbitofEverything4U I would've just wanted for modok to be another person and to have entered the mcu more sooner to be honest, like in iron man 3 he would've fitted in so well with his A.I.M army. Iron man 3 is my favorite superhero movie of all time

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, good point. If Marvel really wanted to do MODOK right, he needed to appear in IM3. I guess since they missed that opportunity, they decided to just go nuts with him. But yeah, you are right about needing him in IM3. And I agree, that's a great movie that doesn't get enough love.

[@serpentlord1312]

Before I watch this I believe this movie is set in between Ms Marvel and Thor Love and Thunder also when me and my mum watched this yesterday when the credits started rolling my mum really just wanted to go home but I kept telling her I know theirs something at the end of this then yeah I was right.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, I can definitely see why you picked a September-ish time frame. I thought the same going in. Assuming we are right about that July date, then it will probably land earlier in the timeline, but your guess made sense. And so glad that you convinced your mum to hang around. Those were two great end credit scenes for sure!

[@serpentlord1312]

@@AbitofEverything4U also another thing I saw somebody mention how this movie kinda felt like a Star Wars movie you have stuff with the cantina flying ships people shooting laser guns the main enemies are soldiers wearing the same outfits the main hero’s are working for a rebellion against an empire one of the oldest members (Janet) has history with the main villain Hank is Modoks old mentor Modok is a evil killing machine made from a man who lost everything Kang is a evil warlord who wants to destroy everything and even the battle at the end felt like a battle to destroy the Death Star but yeah.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yes, I agree, there were alot of Star Wars parallels. I thought that was pretty cool!

[@mikepatton7577]

Disregarding what Peyton Reed said in the interviews, maybe 18 year old Cassie said she was 6 because Scott and Hope returned to a different timeline where the attack happened earlier?

[@natsohigh5552]

They would have returned to a different timeline if they went through a time vortex. Which they didn't.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yeah, it would be wild if Peyton actually had a plan in mind with his comment. But I suspect he just messed up and is trying to cover his mistake. I mean AM&TW actually has Scott saying she's 10 and then Peyton says she's 9. He didn't even read the earlier scripts he directed. Ugh. Oh well, still enjoyed the movie. Kang was amazing! Thanks so much for watching the vid and leaving your feedback. Really appreciate it!

[@mikepatton7577]

@@AbitofEverything4U No prob. Yeah, just had a thought of, what if it was a different Cassie that brought him and Hope back. Could be cool

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yeah, you have to wonder if there is a greater meaning behind the age error. Sadly, I suspect it isn't the case, but it could be. Would be quite a twist if so.

[@MFSHARTY]

Yeah man I love you

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Thanks! I definitely love making the vids. Appreciate the positive feedback!

[@NimN0ms]

I haven't watched this movie and most likely wont until the Disney+ release. I also don't care for spoilers anymore. The fact that they are STILL getting the timeline f-ed up is just embarrasing. I REALLY appreciate this video as it is vindicates my decision to watch the movie at a very later date. I did hear GREAT things about Johnathan Major's Kang as well (including post credit scene). I also heard that the way the Kang's show up in the post-credit is similar to how Reed Richards showed up in Multiverse of Madness. Great videoI I just wish this movie was exciting for me.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yeah, I can understand your feelings about not going to see the movie. I promise it's alot better than the critics make it out to be. Kang was indeed truly amazing. Can't wait for him to take over Phase 5 and 6. The timeline issues are very frustrating. I truly hope it's just Peyton Reed trying to cover up his mistakes rather than Marvel in general just not caring anymore. If you do decide to check it out in the theatre, I think you'll enjoy it. But if not, then you'll have one more thing to look forward to on D+ in a few months. Great comments as always!

[@realjohnlove]

18:20 Thor The Dark World is criminally underrated I never got the hate

[@AbitofEverything4U]

I agree, T:TDW only suffered due to it's villain being totally meh. Otherwise, the movie is fantastic. I like it alot better than many fans do. TBH, I just mentioned it as I know alot of people rank it low and so it was strange to see QM be a full 20 points lower on its RT score.

[@realjohnlove]

@@AbitofEverything4U In another comment, I mentioned the visuals & the believability of what people are watching. Thor: The Dark World took us to Asgard & made you feel like “this looks real”. Despite people thinking the film is bad, people don’t criticize the visuals or how the film was presented pther than maybe the Accursed & Dark Elves costumes even though I thought they looked fine.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

No, I agree, T:TDW had great visuals. Lame villain overall, but great visuals thruout!

[@realjohnlove]

@@AbitofEverything4U that shit looked good

[@Blazecap]

17:35 and 17:55 what? Ant-man and the wasp is higher than the original? I never noticed!

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Ikr? That seems crazy to me, but at least I guess the numbers were close. Still, I think AM 1 is much better than AM&TW overall.

[@Blazecap]

@@AbitofEverything4U definitely

[@blazingocean4206]

This Kang is the One Who Remains, except in this timeline he dies instead of getting out.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Good theory! I'm making a follow-up video that dives into my thoughts on that as well. Hope to have it out tomorrow. Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@Smile-hk7vd]

Am i the only who's confused about Rotten ratings for this movie? Yes, this is definitely a movie that didn't live to it's hype as always because people always expecting too much. But i don't think it's deserved to be rank lower than Love and Thunder, Captain Marvel, Iron Man 2, The Dark World, even Ant-Man and The Wasp

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yup, completely agree with you. I have no idea why the critics are so hard on it. I hope it doesn't impact the box office, as those critic ratings are so wrong. Great commentary as always!

[@RestNPlayVideos]

Peyton Reed Vs Homecoming: Dawn of Continuity

[@AbitofEverything4U]

I love it! I would go see that movie in a heartbeat!

[@raulguillermogarciareyes1817]

Peyton Reed is clearly wrong. The way I fixed it in my head is that Cassie aged herself down to brag (I know teens that do that unintentionally because they want to think that they have lived a lot. Regarding the rating, I understand and respect all opinions, but almost everyone I know agreed more with the critics, so it was a relief to find people who liked it. I was starting to feel alone.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Totally agree with your comments. Cassie as a character in the movie could be explained as dropping her age down either intentionally or perhaps even by accident, but for the writers and for Peyton to actually think she is 6 is just painful. And yes, I'm so glad the critics seem to be proven wrong on the movie. It was a good movie and I hope it has a fantastic opening weekend!

[@natsohigh5552]

People are just jumping on the hate train for the views. When you have people saying this film is the worst MCU film to date, you KNOW they're lying for views.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Excellent point! Yes, you do have to wonder if people are hungry for clicks when they say things as definitive as "worse MCU movie to date". Sigh. Oh well, I really liked the movie. Good solid 7.5 - 8/10. Not in the top percentage of Marvel movies, but very enjoyable.

[@Thecoolestpersonudontknow]

At this point marvel needs to hire you to map the timeline bc you do a far better job than them 😭👏

[@AbitofEverything4U]

I would so love that job. I'd do it for free! Heck, I'd pay them for the chance to do it. My phone line is open, Marvel...call me...please!

[@PrinceTron1]

This confirms what you said that Quantumania could've used another 20-25 minutes and I agree. I love exposition and back story in films, especially the MCU. Nathaniel Richards comes from a heroic or perhaps even villainous, lineage. What turns a brilliant, scientific genius into a reality and world conquering monster? Who were his parents and childhood friends? Oh by the way, who amongst the Kang Variants knew about the quantum realm and how to banish Kang Prime there? kzbin.info/www/bejne/oGOpgmqVac1lmNk

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Oh wow! Yes, that does indeed explain alot! I think it would have greatly benefitted from more back story as hard-core fans like myself are willing to wait for more later, but the average fan likely felt the story was incomplete and felt abit cheated. Thanks so much for sharing that vid. It totally makes sense!

[@StormAsher104]

Yeah the critics are doing some grad a bullshit when ranking the movie, it was fucking awesome and everyone is rating it terribly, the story was so awesome and the two post credits scenes were so freaking cool Edit: it’s not getting the praise it deserves

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Totally agree. Not sure why critics were so upset with the movie. I'd give it a solid 7.5 or 8 out of 10 for sure. I hope fans flood the box office and that it does well financially, which is the best way to prove the critics wrong. Thanks so much for watching the vid and sharing your thoughts. Really appreciate it!

[@knilla2k]

One of the funniest videos you’ve ever made 😂😂 mans must’ve been drunk

[@knilla2k]

Loved the movie so much btw. Seeing MODOK after being a fan of him and Kang for a long time was like a comic come to life. I don’t know what the critics are on, I had a lot of fun.

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yeah, Peyton (Reed, not Manning) gave one of the strangest interviews I've ever seen. So bizarre. I sure hope that dude was well over the allowable BAC limit, as that's the only explanation I can come up with. But yes, I loved the movie. Kang and MODOK were amazing. Can't wait to see Kang take over Phases 5 and 6!

[@TheDukeCountyGaBoy01]

I still think she starts 17 in the movie during the quotmanina she turns 18

[@AbitofEverything4U]

I like that idea. I really hope that's what they go with!

[@TheDukeCountyGaBoy01]

@@AbitofEverything4U same with the first movie starts of 7 birthday party 8

[@AbitofEverything4U]

Yep, totally agree!