Living in the 50's with those kinds of clothes, if only Gabrielle knew how much of an impact her clothes would still be even 60 - 70 years later her clothes are still very relevant and modern.
@Violetrain3166 жыл бұрын
ruzzell907 Not to mention her much coveted/sought after iconic Double CC branded sunglasses!
@islandbirdw Жыл бұрын
Thanks simply to the skill and dedication of their “hired gun” Karl Lagerfeld.
@regplate41397 жыл бұрын
This is the outcome when everyone is scared to say 'No'!
@Carducci19597 жыл бұрын
Simpson was never a beauty, but here, Lagerfeld has portrayed her as an absolute monster!
@philipkuttner79457 жыл бұрын
He's showing what she was like inside (not that I ever knew her, but she seems to have been . . . not very admirable.)
@kafunamasinde22656 жыл бұрын
i legit Laughed Out Loud at the unexpected turn of this comment!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@elisabethbathory9515 жыл бұрын
because she was a monstre
@miriamhavard76214 жыл бұрын
The black lipstick makes no sense....
@miriamhavard76214 жыл бұрын
She was beautiful. The British media up to their lying antics.
@selmacyrinebelhadi61414 жыл бұрын
Suit, hat and shoes are perfect, the essence of French elegance. Of course, she would not remove her hat or shoes to receive a guest, she was Gabrielle Chanel and not any ordinary housewife. Moreover, she was a woman of the 19th century, and at that time, a hatless woman was either very poor or a prostitute. The "conversation" with Wallis Simpson has no interest in itself, the film is just an opportunity to show Coco's apartment as the public is not admitted to visit it, and to feel its atmosphere.
@karyannfontaine87576 жыл бұрын
A peek at times gone by. Note the handkerchief tucked into Coco Chanel's sleeve. My great aunt and her friends did that as well. I enjoyed the film and thank you for posting.
@Violetrain3166 жыл бұрын
kary ann Fontaine Lol....mine did too....and I do it myself....all the time!
@caligulalonghbottom26295 жыл бұрын
at one time, certainly used as a cum rag for a nazi officer.
@francesodle93764 жыл бұрын
Could not hear
@charwest94494 жыл бұрын
@@caligulalonghbottom2629 OMG I actually guffawed at that one! You're spot on!
@caligulalonghbottom26294 жыл бұрын
@@charwest9449 lol i hate gabrielle chanel
@princevesperal Жыл бұрын
For those who don't know, this is not the full film. When Chanel goes to take a nap, she has a lengthy dream about Shanghai and how Chinese influences could be included in her collections. And then she wakes up and realises it was just a dream. If you look at the end credits, you can see the name and cast of the missing scenes: "Chinese room, China in the 60s", "China night club dressing room, early 40s", "Shanghai Express, 30s", etc.
@charlottebruce87967 жыл бұрын
What did I just see??? Bad acting, pointless film, bad lipstick and she didn't even drink her tea before she left. Weird.
@Monique-rn9lg4 жыл бұрын
Two rich, decadent cadavers.
@SerafEnd4 жыл бұрын
Yes, it's horrible.
@princevesperal4 жыл бұрын
It's just the beginning and end of the movie. In the full version, when she falls asleep, she has a dream that takes her to China.
@yasminx163 жыл бұрын
@@princevesperal 😂😂 are you serious!? 😂😂
@princevesperal3 жыл бұрын
@@yasminx16 look it up! It's also very weird. Lagerfeld couldn't help but cast his protégé Baptist Giabiconi as the Emperor of China. You know, with a bit of make up to give him "Asian eyes"... 🙄
@mandolaymandooolay89014 жыл бұрын
Felt empty and lonely
@toffthe7 жыл бұрын
who doesn't like a nice nap while wearing a wide brimed hat and high heals , so relaxing!
@eseereoj6 жыл бұрын
You know? In her later years, Coco Chanel had her wig sewn to her wide brimmed hat, so here, essentially, her character was enjoying a nice nap while wearing a wig which was sewn to a wide brimmed hat and high heals-- and a white Chanel suit and several strands of pearls, faux or not (?) --, so relaxing! (BTW, Wallis Simpson was conceivably not so relaxed in real life, however, as she was suffering bad bunions 24/7, while wearing high heals...)
@applejellypucci6 жыл бұрын
She needed to heal the pain of being in her heels all day.
@yolandaem6235 жыл бұрын
Laurence von Winkenburge r
@TheBasher-_-2 жыл бұрын
Removing a hat in these days was not a simple process. And you wore the hat as you would your hair for your visit.
@lyndawilliams45702 жыл бұрын
Why I may just do it today after I take off my Jersey pajamas from other favorite designer a la Walmart. No heels though - these moccasins lined with rich Sherpa are staying on.
@boboneill65544 жыл бұрын
Chanel was a grande horizontale when she was young. She was kept the duke of Westminster, among others.
@lapislazuli78762 ай бұрын
She would not have made it without the finances of all those men. That’s just a fact.
@natachaferdman44772 ай бұрын
Yes that is why they are giggling at the tea bag, Karl told me…
@MMijdus6 жыл бұрын
This was a scene from The Devil Wears Chanel.
@Ocean-gk2im5 жыл бұрын
What?
@charwest94494 жыл бұрын
good one!
@fgtbossboss50924 жыл бұрын
😂
@chriskline56575 жыл бұрын
These comments have restored my faith in humanity… Absolutely hilarious.
@emeraldrose48483 жыл бұрын
I observed how human interaction can turned into a cat fight🤣
@alexandramsh47402 жыл бұрын
@@emeraldrose4848 🤓
@rickmaggie15 жыл бұрын
I would have loved to have met Wallis Simpson and Chanel, that time period in our lives was fascinating to me
@rupertfergusson4 жыл бұрын
They were Nazis
@92ab183 жыл бұрын
Out of all the greats you could have chosen, you pick the two who would use their influence and power to have you killed and not feel one ounce of guilt Lol. You sure know how to pick them!
@danielenriquemarchenalopez953 жыл бұрын
2 Bitches lol
@melbabowen43893 жыл бұрын
The notion that Wallis Simpson Windsor and the Duke were Nazi sympathizers is not true. As the media does, today, they twisted snd lied
@blippypippy81672 жыл бұрын
@@melbabowen4389 explain please.
@Rain-tg2ji5 жыл бұрын
Quite confused about all negative comments here, Personally I see the most elegant form of communication between woman here... I hope one day I can communicate with a woman in such elegant way LOVE LOVE Chanel
@caligulalonghbottom26294 жыл бұрын
fakeness and surface level bullshit isn't 'elegant'
@Roheryn1002 жыл бұрын
Communicate about what ? The set of a shoulder seam ? Is that the height of your ambition ?
@Rain-tg2ji2 жыл бұрын
@@caligulalonghbottom2629 and brutal honesty is vulgar dear
@Rain-tg2ji2 жыл бұрын
@@Roheryn100 the gesture talk a lot here, pay more attention dear
@Roheryn1002 жыл бұрын
@@Rain-tg2ji The Emperor has no clothes on. Do carry on with your sycophantic worship.
@francoaragosta42855 жыл бұрын
I enjoyed this "atmospheric" fantasie-vignette of an incident that probably never happened. Aside from Chanel's magnificent suit and the actress's insightful, subtly evovocative portrayal of the way Chanel must have comported herself -- a portrayal helped immensely by the actress'suncanny resemblance to Coco, herself --, I especially liked the MUSIC which managed to elegantly Gallic, poignant, sophisticated as only a true Parisienne could be, nostalgic and PERFECTLY attuned to the era evoked here. I enjoyed the little film, but then felt both sick at heart and sick to my stomach as I examined the comments which in the main are unbearably crude, boorish, needlessly snarky, and disturbiingly reflective of the coarse, spiteful, witless mentality that characterizes what society most regrttably has become today.
@miriamhavard76214 жыл бұрын
Franco Aragosta agree.
@caligulalonghbottom26294 жыл бұрын
Not sure if Wallis and Coco were ever really close at all since Wallis LOVED Schiaparelli and Madame Chanel hated Elsa...
@magesalmanac64242 жыл бұрын
“what society has become today” eeerrrrr society has always been like that.
@ladybug58592 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure what to think from this very short vignette. MY understanding is that Coco was born extremely poor and grew up extremely poor and I gather was surrounded by nuns and hence her her liking of black-and-white & the black uniform of servanymts which transmorphed into " the little black dress". IN addition, I recall that she resided in France in a very famous hotel with a Nazi officer during the war at which time many French were dying and those belonging to the resistance were dying in spades while she lived quite well. Knowing this, I can't help think of this--her humble origins & her comportmant duribg the war--when I look at this very hard; very controlled; very disciplined and very full of herself woman. WE ALL KNOW WHERE SHE came from and WE ALL KNOW WHERE she ended up so I'm simply not impressed. Someone once offered to buy me a Chanel suit and I thought that could be fun but it wasn't really something that I was dying to have. IN retrospect, I really don't think I want one. I haven't read the comments that you referenced but I think that your comment was rather naive. It appears YOU DON'T KNOW HER origin or what she ended up doing during WWII. I'd recommend u study up on that and then see this vignette again and reflect upon this woman.
@sandworms94512 жыл бұрын
Well said
@parisalan15 жыл бұрын
Well, at least we know there won't be a part 2...
@manijehsasi36644 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your comment , the best, this in deed is the most stupid video, no point at all.
@hunkhk2 жыл бұрын
grateful for that
@joeg29642 жыл бұрын
Your comment was spot on. I died laughing.
@ilonawawaksmundzki98087 жыл бұрын
Sleeping in hat, acting like a robot... didn’t picture Coco as lifeless person and Duchess look was taken from Cruella character at best
@bitterbeauty61442 жыл бұрын
Two of the creepiest looking women. I've seen interviews with the duchess. She spoke with an ersatz English accent despite being born and raised in America and exiled from England after only living there a handful of years.
@WitchKing-Of-Angmar8 ай бұрын
I don't think you understand that American accents are not how they are today remotely. We used to roll our rs in th 1910s and that barely stopped by the 1930s.
@mrkongsimr3 жыл бұрын
I have been in that apartment , very nice !!
@charlessoutherton89463 жыл бұрын
Basically, Chanel disapproved of almost every designer calling them impractical, she hated Schiaparelli and allegedly gossiped on Dior's New Look Designs saying that she didn't think them suitable for the modern woman, as she viewed Dior designs as restrictive with corsets and petticoats and viewed Schiaparelli with vain views as she was against the idea of her surrealist designs being used and classed as fashion.
@modfus3 жыл бұрын
However, she did have great respect for Balenciaga.
@lilspring1057 Жыл бұрын
she wouldn't have any for today's state of the house. Nor would Balenciaga himself :(.@@modfus
@1day2dayme Жыл бұрын
How I wish she could time travel to the contemporary times and it would be a treat to hear what she gets to say about today's fashion world...
@charlessoutherton8946 Жыл бұрын
@@1day2dayme well in Karl Largefeld's film "The Return" which showcases her return to the fashion world after WW2, in an interview after her 1958 collection she states that she hates short skirts and blue jeans so even for what was considered relaxing attire of the time she loathed contemporary fashions, she'd hate it, even more, today on how vulgar and style-less it is especially with everything being sexualised and shaped to fit the body like a second skin, especially for women. she may have liberated the corset but not the body from clothes
@ElzbietaSwiekАй бұрын
@@1day2dayme" fashion world "...
@stephaniestanley80417 жыл бұрын
A delightful fantasy. Love Wallis' dress.
@pppukkie11852 жыл бұрын
inspirations for many ladies
@valvacious27935 жыл бұрын
I want CoCo's hat and shoes!! fabulous!
@monty96192 жыл бұрын
I can see how these two would have been best friends...
@jodyflanagan33197 жыл бұрын
Not sure what the point in this was, but all I saw was Chanel not the least bit impressed by Wallis and Wallis being quite rude to Chanel.
@karineekg7 жыл бұрын
Jody flanagan which is why she'd dubbed her the guest from hell
@francesodle93764 жыл бұрын
Chanelle knew if Walley wor her creations be good for business
@douglaslarue42644 жыл бұрын
Back in the day Chanel was a High End Dressmaker. Wallace would have seen her as "Subservient".
@blippypippy81672 жыл бұрын
@@douglaslarue4264 true. And Chanel would have seen Wallis as "gauche", but DELICIOUSLY RICH.
@rosemaryallen21282 жыл бұрын
Appearances are so deceptive, and popular reputations even more so. I accidentally read a piece of writing by Wallis, not knowing the author. I was hugely impressed by the fine, intelligent judgement shown. In the same way, in Chanel's biography, I discovered that this famous woman was so troubled emotionally that she was eventually given to self-harm. Image is a strange thing.
@skyblue58004 жыл бұрын
I just ordered a piece from Lagerfeld so I feel justified in asking what in the hell is going on here? Don’t know how I got here, but stayed for the comments.
@johnking54334 жыл бұрын
I've admired the two deer decorations in pictures of Coco's appartment. It was cool to see them in film.
@melltell7 жыл бұрын
I love the shoes
@stephaniestanley80416 жыл бұрын
I love it. The sets, clothes, and make up. Short, choppy, and mindless behavior... Karl's intention.
@kidnap20105 жыл бұрын
What's to like?? Its a terrible attempt to a short movie; Boring, badly lit and acted, horrible make up (never in the 40's 50's you would see black lipstick on anyone, until punks in the 70's, and gothics 15 years later. Wallis would NEVER pour the tea herself, Chanel could have but would never either; Bad, bad, KL experience. He is so right to stick to what he does best : fashion...
@miriamhavard76214 жыл бұрын
@@kidnap2010 very good points.
@Roheryn1002 жыл бұрын
@@kidnap2010 Agreed. Very amateurish.
@christopherdiedrich402 жыл бұрын
You crazy omg who the hell wants to see black lips? Turrrrible‼️
@lapislazuli78762 ай бұрын
@@kidnap2010he actually wasn’t very good at fashion either. What he did at Chanel was not chanel. It was kitsch and pastiche and just not good. Anyone who understands fashion knows that. His shows at Chanel were horrible overblown spectacles of kitsch and camp also. He had such a weird Germanic stilted sense of humour. To me, karl was more philosopher in the German tradition than designer. He would’ve made a great fashion journalist, yes - due to his knowledge of fashion history and design . But he was a shocking fashion designer and even more shocking director. These vignettes and movies were all diabolically bad. I also agree about the black lipstick, and just the whole style of it. It’s stilted and strange. There was also no narrative. No proper characterisation. His Wallis and coco are just made of straw and just stereotypes. Really silly. Belongs in a Sunday afternoon drag show, but Karl portrays it as high theatre or serious auteurship. It’s laughable that he takes it so seriously.
@krismartinez23347 жыл бұрын
A lot of us prefer to believe what we think,than the truth about anything.
@brianmoore85257 жыл бұрын
As if Coco would slouch around the residence in a hat and power suit without removing the swiss shoes. Quelle erreur.
@kevinjewell2337 жыл бұрын
The apartments over rue Cambon were merely used as a place for a break from work downstairs, she was at work, and would have kept her hat and shoes on, once at the Ritz apartment she'd have taken off the shoes. It is MEN who are obliged to remove their hats when entering a building, NOT WOMEN!!!
@caligulalonghbottom26295 жыл бұрын
She would have been giving a nazi officer a blowie on her knees, perhaps resting on a tweed pillow. use your faux outrage on people who matter.
@francesodle93764 жыл бұрын
Kevin a smart joe about hats for women.. and then the tradition for wearing a hat for men these day i do not believe the young men know to take their hats off in doors. And young i m talking 40 years i v notice for years men have not taken their hats off but mist manners have gone to way side. Was it the hippy parents i d k some ppl do the opposite.
@jenniferschmitzer2994 жыл бұрын
Kevin JEWELL Hi there Kevin, I understand your comment is from a couple of years ago and I concur. The ladies of that era were not required to move their hats as it wasn't the custom.. maybe the gloves? i am not sure. I always thought it was a connection with something in the Bible about headdress regarding the sexes. I am not sure what book or chapter it was written in.. however, I remember as a child it was deemed OK for a lady to wear a hat in church yet not a man. Maybe that custom spread to different arenas. xx
@charwest94494 жыл бұрын
@@caligulalonghbottom2629 Right you are! I laughed out loud when I read your comment!
@Lellobeetle6 жыл бұрын
Lagerfeld as strange as ever.
@annatixi8864 жыл бұрын
Fantastique Coco!!!!!
@damonicajones43965 жыл бұрын
Wow, this is so nice Karl was legendary! And Chanel is and always be #1.
@johnerdmann27003 жыл бұрын
KARL WAS A REAL KING-EXCELLENT!
@hummingnectarbird6 жыл бұрын
Look beyond the obvious and reall "see". The film was meant to show the frivolous pursuit of pleasure and quest for acceptance to offset the ennui of their everyday lives. Everything, anything, to fight the boredom, the endless dressing, parties, social climbing, etc. CoCo can't relax on a couch because she must be "perfect" at all times. She doesnt remove her hat, jacket or shoes because she must always be "on". Dressing to the nines, name dropping by Wallis, and shared useless tidbits are just niceties expected. The fact the Wallis pours the tea when it should have been her host, is an unacceptable faux pas. She should have asked first and tea is poured by the host or the host designate. Wallis' social status is offset by Coco, who hardly gives a damn about her but will make clothes for her. Why? Because Wallis had the perfect frame and bearing that displayed Coco's clothing to the fullest and she had plenty of exposure, though some was questionable. Both women are users but they need each other. Wallis wants social status and to have a bespoke wardrobe by Chanel (which she can ill afford and most likely be "gifts"). She disparages other fantastic designers such as Mainbocher and Shaperelli as not being, for her, the "thing to be seen in" but CoCo' s creations are. The wonderful aside to this is Coco doesn't design for just anyone. To have one of her couture pieces represent "arrival", though Wallis never quite gets that. Though successful in her own right, Coco's no fool. She knows her clothes would look marvelous on Wallis' thin frame and the exposure would be far and wide. Coco isn't afraid of censure for creating clothes for Wallis. She's too well established for that and Wallis' notorious past only adds to the mystique. But these little "games" must be played out. It was expected in their time. Nothing seems to happen in the film and that's just the point. Nothing worthwhile DID happen, at least on the surface. But the undertones and what was NOT said spoke volumes.
@Violetrain3166 жыл бұрын
hummingnectarbird Excellent commentary and explanation! There is only so much dressing up in the finest of couture, imbibing the finest champaignes and wines; dining with and at the most selective and expensive fare, attending the most exclusive and inclusive social affairs, sharing the most distasteful and private gossip, residing in the most fabulously appointed mansions; and being catered to with every conceivable service of carte blanche known to mortal man wherever you travel! It can only satisfy for so long....because these things, although they do bring a modicum of temporary bliss......they do nothing for the mortal soul!
@doniellestenson52316 жыл бұрын
Its all so much rubbish
@01denese5 жыл бұрын
I don't think Wallis poured tea. I think she just took the tea bags out and told a dirty sex joke about her time in Shanghai.
@HJKelley475 жыл бұрын
@e james: Interesting, for Edward was in dialogue with Hitler at the beginning of WW2, some time before Germany decided to bomb England. An admirer?? OK.
@HJKelley475 жыл бұрын
@e james : Would you have felt that way if it had been your family that was bombed?
@irisetpoppy99562 жыл бұрын
J'ai pu voir Mademoiselle Chanel ainsi habillée, portant perles, chapeau, tailleur beige, vers 9 heures un matin, rue Cambon, sortant du Ritz. Jacques Chazot soutenait discrètement son bras. C'était peu de mois avant son décès. Même si j'avais eu mon appareil photo, je ne l'aurais pas photographiée. Mais la scène est restée imprimée dans ma mémoire et mon cœur. Admiration !
@ElzbietaSwiekАй бұрын
Bardzo Ci zazdroszczę...!!!!!!!!!!
@emmashaw62107 жыл бұрын
Two brilliant women: One built an empire and one threatened to destroy it. Both perfect socialites and this is the dialogue they have? What?
@henriettahenson6 жыл бұрын
Well said ...
@carolayala18415 жыл бұрын
@@johndean3930 well said!!
@francesodle93764 жыл бұрын
Wally like the deep pockets of the king hiw do women like her trap these men. Her looks her life history she won in the end. I do not think he was a catch but that s my opinion
@omgmono4 жыл бұрын
John Dean stfu
@charwest94494 жыл бұрын
the thing they most shared was their love of Nazis; you'd think they would have spoken of that.
@judydennis12425 жыл бұрын
Can't stop laughing😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣
@stephaniestanley80415 жыл бұрын
What needs to be understood about this scene is that it is supposed. A scenario that might have occurred with Chanel and the Duchess. Lagerfeld purposely placed awkward pauses and harsh make up to create the fantasy.
@MsCValentiner5 жыл бұрын
Yeah, but the result is disastrously dilettante.
@charwest94494 жыл бұрын
Yes, exactly. He is portraying their ghastliness with surprising candor.
@lapislazuli78762 ай бұрын
@@MsCValentinerand disastrously bad! All his vignette movies were appallingly directed, shot and made. Just cringey.
@lapislazuli78762 ай бұрын
@@stephaniestanley8041Karl always had this weird Germanic style. All his fashion shows were horribly Germanic. He just lacked style in the truest sense. There was always something wrong to me about his placement of bows or the cut or the length. What he had though was pre self belief because he was raised affluent and spoiled by his parents and so believed way too much in his own talent. That’s why he was always so jealous of the naturally talented YSL. He knew a Yves had that elegant touch. Karl was so pharaonic and Fascistic really. Quite Hitlerian in his approach. Giant Chanel bags and really bad kitschy staging. And yet dumb fashion people would fawn and rave and think it was all so fabulous. I always found it tacky back then and even his recent shows were always bad. His interpretation of Chanel was diabolical and anyone with taste knows that. Mademoiselle would’ve hated what he did to her Maison and name. Karl was a great example of what gargantuan self-belief and way too much money can do for someone with ambition and a huge ego.
@ElzbietaSwiekАй бұрын
@lapislazuli7876 AMEN. .......🙏❣️👍
@carolweaver32695 жыл бұрын
Restless, uncomfortable, alone and bored. So much and yet never enough. Something missing and could not find it?
@pianoman5510005 жыл бұрын
Chanel is speaking with an American English mid-Western dialect??? SMH!
@miriamhavard76214 жыл бұрын
Yeah...... that was weird. 🙄😒😕
@roccojoerg5 жыл бұрын
The Duchess was never granted the title "Altesse Royale" (Royal Highness)! She was "just" the Duchess of Windsor.
@miriamhavard76214 жыл бұрын
roccojoerg in the home she shared with the Duke, she WAS referred to as HRH, that was the RULE there. No doubt other people called her that as well. lt makes sense for a courtier, and certainly staff of a courtier to refer to her as "your royal highness."
@charwest94494 жыл бұрын
@@miriamhavard7621 thank you for that interesting tidbit! However, a pet name at home, even if it is a "rule", is not the same as being granted a real title. Is Queen Latifa really a Queen? Is Lady Gaga really a Lady? I think not.
@caligulalonghbottom26294 жыл бұрын
Everyone in their social circle referred to her as HRH though...it just wasn't legal in the UK but they lived in Paris...a republic and they made their own rules...clearly.
@caligulalonghbottom26294 жыл бұрын
@@charwest9449 Well, she was entitled to that style. It wasn't just a pet named, she was refused a title/style that she was entitled to.
@charwest94494 жыл бұрын
@@caligulalonghbottom2629 As you say, even though she was refused that title, she continued to use that title in her private life. Then this film elegantly highlights that controversy.
@emmashaw62107 жыл бұрын
Wallis went to China when she was married and she was hardly a child at 22. Also, she was never given a royal title.
@angelonearth1116 жыл бұрын
Emma J. ...When you are like 80 years old, 22 must feel like when you were a child
@charwest94494 жыл бұрын
Right, she went to China either as a married woman, or after her first divorce, or her second divorce, to chase after some useful contact she had met, who could introduce her to royal society. It was very dangerous to travel at that time, but she was determined to make use of this contact, and she was willing to take any risk.
@Lianel4025 жыл бұрын
Like something out of Addams Family ....
@danabrown2763 жыл бұрын
Only people missing in the circus are Big Edie and Lil Edie.
@TsetsiStoyanova6 жыл бұрын
The king’s wife and the queen of fashion!
@caligulalonghbottom26295 жыл бұрын
Well, Wallis may actually take both of those titles. Shes often called the best dressed woman of all time...
@mylesgarcia46255 жыл бұрын
She was NEVER his wife while he was king. So, she was always an honorary duchess -- like Meghan Markle.
@caligulalonghbottom26295 жыл бұрын
@@mylesgarcia4625 meghan markle has the style of HRH shes a royal duchess.
@mylesgarcia46255 жыл бұрын
@@caligulalonghbottom2629 Do you even understand basic English? I NEVER said MM didn't have any style of whomever. . .
@mylesgarcia46255 жыл бұрын
@@caligulalonghbottom2629 Not really. I think that title would go to someone like Jackie Kennedy, Deeda Blair or even Vicomtesse Jacqueline Ribes of France. Wallis too was as flat as an ironing board.
@sarahwilson79835 жыл бұрын
Karl...dude. Stick with designing frocks and fanning yourself.
@MsMcmoe4 жыл бұрын
'Wallis' is lookin a lil Goth.
@miriamhavard76214 жыл бұрын
MsMcmoe interesting concept.
@junkolibertines21466 жыл бұрын
Love the mademoiselle channel ❤️
@blippypippy81672 жыл бұрын
Legs to die for!
@katharinecrumpton63147 жыл бұрын
well thats 5:44 of my life i will never get back
@henriettahenson6 жыл бұрын
Hilarious ...i could' .nt have put it better my self ...what a crock !!!
@haaao16 жыл бұрын
Plus whatever took you to write that instead of moving on (with your life).
@mrlopez-pz7pu5 жыл бұрын
Typing up that comment only took 30 seconds. That absurd chola lip color was enough to justify a thumb down for this stupid vid. Back to the drawing board Mr. Lagerfield.
@annalucy53075 жыл бұрын
@@mrlopez-pz7pu nope...she or he watched it the whole time, and then who knows how long she or he took to type it. REally...me is correct, neither you or the OP are.
@francesodle93764 жыл бұрын
The country wanted those 2 far away from Europe. Bad news those 2 Walley Simpson and The firmer King Edward Vlll had to get them seay from Europe she was bad news and he too
@heperile6 жыл бұрын
The Duchess was never made an HRH so it is incorrect for her to be addressed as "son Altesse royale". This was a famous sore point for the Duke and Duchess so the error is all the more glaring.
@01denese5 жыл бұрын
Officially, yes, but suck-ups may have still referred to her that way in private.
@caligulalonghbottom26295 жыл бұрын
She was addressed that way everywhere really outside of Britain...socially she was pretty much always referred to by it.
@SaaharaGlaude5 жыл бұрын
@@caligulalonghbottom2629 True!
@SaaharaGlaude5 жыл бұрын
@@01denese True!
@SaaharaGlaude5 жыл бұрын
That's the bad thing bout social media: erroneous statements. She 'was' referred to as HRH 'outside' The Firm.
@RositaAHuff7 жыл бұрын
What in the world is this? Who cares? Why did I watch this ....?
@carloshenriquemaiarosario74485 жыл бұрын
Rosita A. Huff yes you’re right ! But is art , picture & photograph art ! Also we can see I’m especial books ! Thanks Ms Rosita A . Huff
@francesodle93764 жыл бұрын
It is history interesting i knew this about Simpson and firmer King Edward Vlll
@shalomccs2 жыл бұрын
Coco Chanel the woman that revolucionáis the fashion industry with elegance and unique style.
@natachaferdman70995 жыл бұрын
Merci Karl de m'avoir expliqué les tea bags.....
@lapislazuli78762 ай бұрын
It was such an unnecessary and bizarre reference and brought nothing to the vignette. Karl had way too much artistic licence here and needed to be reigned in. He was a really appallingly bad director: stilted, awkward, long gaps of nothing, bad acting, strange vampire make up, Chanel sleeping in full Chanel drag on her chaise longue. All of it just so so bad. The only people who like it are mindless fashionistas with no clue about fashion or cultural history. It’s shockingly amateur.
@katerineaubry34545 жыл бұрын
That was very interesting.I enjoyed it.
@MakeHipHopaconsciencetreasure5 жыл бұрын
Love the lipstick. The art of conversation. He's capturing her essence. this mini short film is superb and classy- love it.
@ronwren12 жыл бұрын
Sorry,but I dn't believe that even Coco sat around alone in her salon with pearls and a hat.Ridiculous,even back then.
@lapislazuli78762 ай бұрын
So cringe.
@Codyheart14 жыл бұрын
Amanda Harlech as Wallis Simpson! She's such a good sport.
@haitang6 жыл бұрын
I am just gonna pretend I didn't watch this.
@natachaferdman44772 ай бұрын
Chercher encore…
@resxen793 жыл бұрын
La duchesse de Windsor n'était pas une altesse Royale. Ce titre ne lui était pas accordé ni par le roi Georges VI ni par l'actuelle reine de Grande Bretagne Elisabeth II.
@danielda44712 жыл бұрын
she wasn't, but she was still introduced as Altesse Royale in Paris society. it's well known she would go furious and take as a personal insult not to be introduced as such.
@lapislazuli78762 ай бұрын
@@danielda4471also, the seamstresses at the Chanel ateliers would’ve addressed her as Altesse to appease her as she spent a lot of money at the rue cambon. So they did as they were told and played the sucking up game. It’s rather ironic because coco herself had a long running affair with the Duke of Westminster and so would’ve been in a similar position to Wallis. She could’ve technically become Gabrielle, Duchess of Westminster but was snubbed at the last minute and the duke married some aristocrat. Coco was lavishly gifted with jewels from the Duke. These tacky foreign women were always trying to sleep their way up the ladders of British high society, wrong by wrong.
@buff256 жыл бұрын
American French Horror Story: Chanel Coven
@candyfeyrer89405 жыл бұрын
She was the greatest woman of all time in her flied of design of fashion designers 👩🎨 I wish I was born then to wear here close then
@coffeetime32932 жыл бұрын
With a good portion of humour, and 1000% autobiographic. One will understand if you have read Mademoiselle by Rhonda K. Garelick.
@marinakaye82846 жыл бұрын
I have a Barbie Doll wearing THAT Chanel suit ! Think it's called Tokyo spring collection.
@olavwilhelm684311 ай бұрын
i love how wallis want's tea , gets it ready and storms of to see the duke lol.... Ohh Karl ohh Karl
@dorianphilotheates37696 жыл бұрын
What odious creatures they are...
@johndean39305 жыл бұрын
Perfect description .
@blippypippy81672 жыл бұрын
They didn't care. They were rich and powerful and "everyone" wanted to be them.
@olgaolga98522 жыл бұрын
Coco lives Chanel's life. She feels alienated. Happiness seems distant. Bonjour tristesse.
@anavilla7134 Жыл бұрын
COCO CHANEL A SUPER CREATIVE WOMAN WHO LIVED AS FREE AND FEMININE LIKE THE CAN-CAN DANCERS, WHICH I TALK ABOUT IN A VIDEO ON MY CHANNEL.
@ryanscottlogan84593 жыл бұрын
The Dutchess of Windsor would never have worn that corpselike lipstick!
@alanpeek29512 жыл бұрын
I think she would. After all she was a walking skeleton!,,
@janloftness6 жыл бұрын
Dreadful women playing dreadful women - perfectly awful. Thanks “Karl”!
@fgtbossboss50924 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately the coco mademoiselle perfume wasn't created by her but still has her style
@LoveDat657 жыл бұрын
What a load of pretentious and boring tosh.
@joeg29642 жыл бұрын
Who did the makeup? Dracula?
@YoBoyMarcus7 жыл бұрын
Lagerfeld really missed the mark with this one...
@johndean39305 жыл бұрын
The point is they were both a pair of hypicritcal bitches.
@yoburbano54336 жыл бұрын
The only good thing about this film is that it was over after 7:58 !,! Time poorly wasted and reflective of The pompous Lagerfeld himself!!
@emmaphilo40497 жыл бұрын
Not invite de merde? they say invite de MARQUE. Loved this. Intimate, lonely Chanel.
@ismaelmendassi73815 жыл бұрын
Bravo félicitations ça tombe juste .!
@questionmark98196 жыл бұрын
Oh dear god the make up 😨
@dinamihelios42882 жыл бұрын
What a load of tripe
@williamevans94265 жыл бұрын
At 1:30, the cover of Paris Match shows HM The Queen, not Wallis Simpson. Is this a mistake or a very subtle reflection that, had Edward VIII not abdicated, Mrs Simpson would have become Queen?
@hunkhk2 жыл бұрын
well if you notice she turned it over one has to assume in disgust or not wanting to see HMTQ looking up at her - the entire thing is all utterly ridiculous
@lapislazuli78762 ай бұрын
The point is she wouldn’t have been queen because they wouldn’t allow him to marry her. So he had to abdicate. Wallis was a divorcee and divorcées back then just couldn’t marry a king or queen. Nowadays anything goes and Charles not only married a divorcee, but also his mistress and then forced everyone to accept her as queen. Not even as consort but as actual Queen which is unheard of really. It goes to show you how much Charles must have been determined not let uncle David’s tragedy befall himself. He got his own way in a way not seen since his ancestor Henry VIII.
@Pariyaa7 жыл бұрын
Where the acting and script cannot get worse!!
@Angel-nu7fm6 жыл бұрын
Notices she throws the magazine with Queen Elizabeth on the floor....
@GFSLombardo6 жыл бұрын
Probably that's what happened but because the table is in the way you do not actually SEE it; or Chanels' reaction on screen, even in slo-mo. She always has her eyes on Wallis. I think a little" movie magic" was performed and the Paris Match "vanished" from the scene. What do you think Chanel's reaction would have been in "real life" if someone, anyone, including Wallis Simpson, had thrown a magazine onto her immaculate rug ? Maintain sangfroid and carry on? Instruct one of her minions to pick it up? Or abruptly, but charmingly, end the conversation due to "an urgent long distance phone call from New York?"
@Angel-nu7fm6 жыл бұрын
You see her pick it up, then you hear it drop
@GFSLombardo6 жыл бұрын
"Good Catch!"
@caligulalonghbottom26295 жыл бұрын
@@GFSLombardo She would ignore it, Wallis Simpson was basically queen of Paris society...
@coolcutsgal22 жыл бұрын
Wallis Simpson was the American widow who caused Edward to abdicate the throne. Her jewelry was world renowned and very prized. The acting was exactly what women who worked with Coco said she was. I believe that Coco may have been bisexual but in those days it was a dangerous proposition.
@lapislazuli78762 ай бұрын
Coco was definitely bisexual. So was Wallis. Both were licentious sexually and had multiple affairs, lovers and were mistresses of famous men and dukes, no less. Not sure if that makes them “strong” or just cheap. They were essentially high class call girls. The only difference is that At least Coco never married and carved out her own career. But her career was started because she slept with powerful rich men. She couldn’t have made it without their money. That needs to be said. There would be no Chanel brand today without the backing of count Etienne and Boy Capel. It was a brand built on concubinism and prostitution, essentially. Not to mention the help of the Nazis. Oops! Did y’all forget that?
@АлексаСаран5 жыл бұрын
Oh, girls
@massimogiordano27785 жыл бұрын
ATMOSPHERE MAGIQUE,,,,,,,COCO. ♥️♥️♥️
@yersweety7 жыл бұрын
I just want to know what Wallis was whispering to the old doll, about tea bag's and /Shanghai ?????
@01denese5 жыл бұрын
The tea bag sex act, I'm sure.
@miriamhavard76214 жыл бұрын
The price of tea in China, perhaps? ☕🤔
@elisabertucci57695 жыл бұрын
Senza parole...
@colettemorris41037 жыл бұрын
excellent
@KF-cx8bm2 жыл бұрын
Asmr for me
@lincolnpaul18145 жыл бұрын
Wallis was a Baltimore Maryland woman without a British accent
@blippypippy81672 жыл бұрын
She had a Transatlantic accent. It's British-FLAVORED.
@lapislazuli78762 ай бұрын
@@blippypippy8167true. Because she mixed in high society circles and just being married to the ex King would’ve taken on his speech patterns also. So a stilted and strangely accented transatlantic accent would be about right for her.
@somerandomvertebrate92622 жыл бұрын
Allegedly I lived in Paris when this took place, although at the time I was even older than Coco. What I wonder though is simply, does the lady never remove her hat?
@trixie92467 жыл бұрын
What a load of rubbish
@clarisaantiagingdermatology6 жыл бұрын
You got that right .. a load of rubbish....nothing to learn from the arrogance of these two woman.,.
@ledymeghaghynandini54905 жыл бұрын
Filipino and La Lzia. callers 1967,1942.,1229
@carolayala18415 жыл бұрын
Absolutely!!
@MystiqueULH5 жыл бұрын
Lagerfeld did not produce rubbish. Apparently you are some uneducated ignorant idiot
@grantshoemake51705 жыл бұрын
Ursula Leach and you’re a sycophant.
@bambesis6225 жыл бұрын
Just a "horizontal collaborator", during WW2, who happened to be good with the needle.
@miriamhavard76214 жыл бұрын
bambesis so much more than that.
@caligulalonghbottom26294 жыл бұрын
@@miriamhavard7621 yeah...more than just horizontal, she was also a spy.
@miriamhavard76214 жыл бұрын
@@caligulalonghbottom2629 l often wonder if she wasn't a double agent.
@caligulalonghbottom26294 жыл бұрын
@@miriamhavard7621 In what way? Pretending to spy for the nazis while actually spying for France? LOL certainly not. She was a proven nazi spy.
@blippypippy81672 жыл бұрын
@@caligulalonghbottom2629 l think she was just hedging her bets.
@tonaricca85292 жыл бұрын
Si , nei bordelli di Shanghai!
@krismartinez23347 жыл бұрын
I found it intriguing.Miss Chanel's apartment and The Chanel suit,shoes should have been the same white as the suit though,still all fabulous.Something else, I thought Coco always wore her pearls a little longer and not so matchy.She asked for the scissors, and I thought she always wore those around your neck too,silly me
@marquamfurniture6 жыл бұрын
Let's not forget about Chanel's non-stop chain-smoking. Her clothes and apartment had to have reeked of stale tobacco.
@cleopatra6582 жыл бұрын
@@marquamfurniture I’ve read they reek of Chanel No5! She used it as a room freshener!
@siculasicana4 жыл бұрын
One should always wear a hat when would be royalty comes a calling. What a stitch!
@jeannemariebizeaujohnson87173 жыл бұрын
Coco amazes me. She's an icon in woman's fashion. As for this sitcom as in all its trash..
@blippypippy81672 жыл бұрын
Perhaps it was meant to be.
@markkotishion23792 жыл бұрын
What do you get when you put a Nazi appeaser & an abwehr agent in the same skit?