I found my Wife Cheating on our HONEYMOON so I expose her to HR - EntitledPeople Reddit Podcast

[@kevinsim989]

Bike locker story: To clarify the OP wasn't destroying council property, he was destroying privately owned locks being used to prevent others from accessing empty lockers.

[@arynkoeings668]

Yeah like I've never seen a sign saying not to leave their locks on the locker an them not be personal locks but here's a thought what if it WAS the counsel members doing this?

[@unstoppablet33n99]

Bro the cats are literally his, so yeah, he wants to keep HIS pets, which he probably payed for😑

[@schizoidmeme5470]

Not only that; it's obvious the Mom is probably a serial Cheater. Legit, as a Father, I find out my spouse was cheating after having a kid. I would let the kid know in a way they'll understand, that that spouse hurt BOTH of us by being selfish. And to those saying, "Don't drag kids into this," Cheaters do that ALL THE TIME and if the betrayed spouse isn't honest, the Cheater will gaslight the children as weapons. I've seen it happen too many damn times. Tell. The. Kids.

[@baremuthebum]

@@schizoidmeme5470 jeez man sorry to hear that.

[@alana.dyer.author]

​@schizoidmeme5470 as a child who was "weaponized" by my mother after she was cheated on by my dad, if yu are going to tell the kids, get them into therapy. I have so much trauma from my narcisitic mother using my dad cheating on her to be a bish and play the victim 24/7 or every time she is called out for her behavior. Before anyone asks, they are still married and she makes dad's life hell.

[@baremuthebum]

@@alana.dyer.author I’m so sorry you had to go through that. I hope you get revenge on your dad for cheating on your mom in the future. Cheaters never win.

[@alana.dyer.author]

@baremuthebum5606 revenge would be more towards my mom. She weaponized me. My dad was a rock star dad...shitty husband though 🤷‍♀️

[@DoomsdayR3sistance]

I think the issue in the inheritance story, is not that OP doesn't want to share her inheritance but rather it is that Kevin is demanding it and on his terms, neither of which are good. If Kevin had been less abrasive and demanding, it could have gone a different way from the start. If Kevin wanted to fairly discuss the inheritance, there are just much better ways to broach the issue.

[@HiFi5280]

Sounds like they were using personal locks which is why he brought up an expensive lock. I like what he did, people shouldn't act like they own public property

[@ChefClap]

I mean it kinda does suck that she got some of his Dad's inherentance. I think it would've been more fair for her to just return the shared portion than give up her inheritance though.

[@Deas-Mhumhna]

Never avoid lawyers! Especially on a cheating partner! Get a Lawyer.

[@robertcross9863]

Yep for cheaters you always nail them to the wall and the helping hands of a lawyer is a great help

[@Claudia-lq3ns]

All of these stories... that's the lesson here. Lawyer up. It may be expensive, but it's worth it.

[@Blargh347]

It depends, some states like New York are no fault states, doesn’t matter who cheated. I have a friend whose wife cheated got caught cheating, he has video proof of her cheating. She still made out in the divorce like a bandit because it’s a no fault state, doesn’t matter who broke the marriage.

[@bazookaboy5192]

For the second story I would say instead of giving him 50% forever repay him the amount that he gave you from his inheritance

[@seshthecat]

Why should she? He chose to share his inheritance.

[@ChefClap]

@@seshthecat no reason to do it legally. Would just be the nice thing to do. Since now she has her inheritance plus half of his.

[@PokekaiPJArchives]

Fun fact: That’s actually Story 3.

[@julieherrera6496]

@@seshthecat moral?

[@morninglion27]

@@seshthecat he didn't the legal system did

[@Daddy12chan]

bookstore story: i think it's simple, he said it's for the kids anyway so, she can just say: ok i put the half of the pay every month on a bank account blocked for our kids and when they have 18, our kids have it. like that the ex husband can't say a thing to her because he said it was for their kids

[@pmbramucci1056]

That's the suggestion I was going to make.

[@davidstephens9203]

For the locker story. It sounds like you may use your own lock. If the locks are not all the same it doesn’t make sense that the “council” would have purchased the locks and put them on the lockers.

[@sage23100]

Yes he got the story wrong 😅 You’re supposed to bring your own lock to the lockers and OP was using the bolt cutters to cut the locks that people brought to the lockers and the lockers still work after that just put a knew lock 🔒 on

[@burgerboydraws3386]

Yea I feel like he was the jerk because that’s destruction of property. Though he had nowhere to put them he could’ve done a bit more to talk about it.

[@jthegoat2313]

@@burgerboydraws3386 nah leaving a locker you aren’t using locked because you don’t wanna have someone else use it is lazy. You deserve your lock cut if there is especially a sign that says no locked lockers when empty it’s a sign of entitlement when someone else needs to use it.

[@videogamesandfieros8361]

@@burgerboydraws3386 Technically, someone from the Council should have been sent around to cut off the locks of the unused lockers. There is clearly a sign saying not to lock empty lockers. Could the OP get in trouble? Technically. But I doubt it, even if he was caught. The two governing bodies refused to do anything and the people locking the lockers are just as much in the wrong.

[@burgerboydraws3386]

@@jthegoat2313 oh it’s lazy alright. But still if do something like leave a sign or sit there until someone try’s to do it and tell them no. And then escalate. If someone’s doing something annoying it doesn’t put you above the law to stop it.

[@daviddang82]

Bookstore story: so if husband wants 50% of the store and share profits going forward, what if there are losses, debt, maintenance, cost of goods, and other expenses, he would be responsible to pay for half of all that too right? Lol. I mean if he wants 50% of the store then he is also responsible for its liabilities.

[@KiatnissNZ]

that's a good idea lmao

[@veowsaku]

That’s the expectation and it is unfair to him if it doesn’t happened. Inheritance assets acquired during marriage don’t need to be split because they are not considered as “earned” but he did it anyway.

[@margiegorto8507]

Hell no he won't be getting anything.

[@voiceless9250]

That true 👀👀👀

[@vegasrenie]

I would lawyer up. Especially since he got the kids involved. I can’t remember exactly what it’s called - alienation of affection I think is reserved just for married people - but he had no business bringing the kids in on it. I would definitely get an attorney.

[@emiliogarza5227]

First story: fire her Second story: if she isn't dealt with now she will only continue doing her crap

[@Iron_spider99]

I think u misunderstood the last story, people were using bike locks to reserve lockers that aren't allowed to be reserved. And he used bolt cutters to remove the bike locks to free up the lockers.

[@donovanwick9278]

its sucks. even if the police were called, theyd do nothing. it's frustrating when no one wants to take responsibility

[@Lillith.]

Bookstore: give it to the children. Neither gets extra money, everything goes in a fund that the children get access to when they're older. OP doesn't seem very attached to it and the ex wants it for the children and because he shared his inheritance. With neither profiting he might be ok with it.

[@Jadae]

Nah, she should keep it. When they were married, money goes to family future. Now that they are single, he is no longer her family, so it should go to her family's future. Nothing technical about it. Family is her future, the law is on her side, and it was not theft. He should not be a part of her equations, except for co-parenting, which he already failed at.

[@75ur15]

@@Jadae legal question notwithstanding, if he shared a significant amount it is morally fair to do the same, law required or not........however, I would agree that courtesy went out the window when he used his kid as a weapon against the ither parent......she was being a butthole at least a little, he went full asshole; and should be (metaphorically) nuked

[@meunomenaoethiago284]

@@Jadae morally she should give him half tho... inheritance money is something that you only share if you want, legally he didnt have to give her half, but he did, so morally it would only be right for her to do the same

[@seshthecat]

@@meunomenaoethiago284 as you stated he decided to share it and she has decided to not share hers. Why should she pay him back for something she had no say over.

[@meunomenaoethiago284]

@@seshthecat morally the right thing to do... she doesnt have to, but it would be the not jerk thing to do. He shared something that was his, whoch was probably a lot, and even though they split, its still a big deal. Legally she doesnt have to share, but the right thing to do would be to reciprocate

[@abcdefg54321x]

16:06. For the bike lock one, I think people used THEIR OWN PERSONAL locks to secure the bike lockers.

[@user-tm1oy6ck4t]

NO WAY I'd share the bookshop. But if it's really about the kids then put 50% of the profits into a trust for when the kids are older.

[@Linkpojken]

The second the ex husband started turning the kids on her the chances of him seeing anything other than a lawsuit over custody went way down.

[@krillissueonshrimpment]

She owes nothing, because if they split it 50/50 during the divorce, that’s fair. If they got it after, nothing is owed

[@angeleyesgreen1586]

Nah, they should never have divorced. They op should have gone for an annulment

[@qua_k]

I think that the lockers didn't actually have a lock attached but that you had to bring your own lock to lock the lockers

[@catcraft21]

Makes sense

[@Silver_Anchor]

I think the locks in the bike locker story are the kind where you bring your own lock and the locker just has a place for the lock to fit. That way, OP could still use his lock, plus if it wasnt a bring your own lock type of system then theres no way it would have worked

[@erraticuk]

Two things. 1. Guys never admit how much you know. 2. Its always worse than you know.

[@lyrics7743]

If my wife did that I would maniacly and histericaly laugh and tell her pack your things and get out of my house

[@Spectre0799]

6:40 THAT MR. BRIGHTSIDE REFERENCE WAS HILARIOUS

[@thedevilsadvocate788]

For the bookstore story: It could be technically a jerk moment, I can admit that it does feel very odd to be okay with taking part of someone else's inheritance, but this should have been covered in court, not after the facts, something along the lines of "I have split my inheritance with you, you have benefited from it in such, such and such ways, so I request that you pay it back", which normally affects how much the wife gets from the divorce. However, signing the deed of the bookstore is a downright no. This can easily backfire against OP in the event of an argument, as having your name on the lease means you can do many things as a co-owner; sign for bank loans, mess with the business to get back at the other. I would never trust someone that can go to his MOMMY for backup and get the KIDS to manipulate their mother. You can work some kind of deal to pay the ex with a little bit of money until the inheritance is covered, but definitely do not cave in for such ridiculous requests.

[@HistoricalFilms-r1e]

I personally think if he had such a problem with it then she should just give him how much money she took from the inheritance and I personally don't consider it a jerk moment for her but for him yes

[@donovanwick9278]

he wanted 50%. i think if he gave a reasonable number and further negotiated with his ex wife it would have been better. also, he involved the kid. creating spite for his mother. he already broke that trust and tbh lost any technicalities into a possible sharing

[@CidVeldoril]

@@donovanwick9278 He is right though. It is unfair that she gets to have 50% of his inheritance just because his parent died earlier.

[@donovanwick9278]

@Wildcard how so? Don't stocks change with time? She technically doesn't owe him anything anymore as they are not together but she says she should. Is that how a thief thinks? I get that's shitty,.. but to call me one lol. It's her family's inheritance. He's not family anymore. I see it as an investment. He made one before as a partner. Let's say he left when the business wasn't making anything (neutral). Now he's back because there's profit after a couple of years and he helped start the company? I wish I cashed out when my stocks when they were worth $109 instead of $78! Lol t's a complicated (shitty) situation. Don't be calling anyone shit, mate (Dick)

[@thedevilsadvocate788]

I am both surprised and fairly amused there are still people who do not know that marriage is absolutely a business, and a very lucrative one at that. Not in the way mentioned by Mr. Wick, but still. Just the mere legal benefits of being married is worth getting that contract on... if you are on the advantaged side, that is. Also... there is no legal obligation for the wife to pay back the money unless he has included that into: a) a prenup, b) a postnup (yes, I also recently learned that was a thing), c) his divorce papers. Also, keep in mind that expenses are normally calculated in the divorce, so it is normally a pretty clear cut. Judges are meant to be fair, after all, and this is the job of the lawyers to properly submit all relevant information pertaining to the split of assets. Keep in mind that we do not have all the details. There is no mention of what was included into the divorce, or if she contributed in any major other ways in the marriage. Example: You get married (god forbid) and your mother passes away (double god forbid), leaving you some inheritance. You never had a job, or is unable to keep one, you get the inheritance, keep some for yourself and share the rest with your partner. Your partner has been providing for you for years, and has been spending a *lot* more money into this marriage that you can't even fathom, but you still shared that money with them, so they spend it to compensate your share of the bills unpaid and etc. Your partner, understandably, gets fed up and finally file for divorce after years, because vows about staying together through thick and thin, through sickness and health can only carry you so far before they understand that this relationship is based on her thick and health to compensate for your thin and sickness. Also, this is the 21st century, and divorce is legal, so... I want to say tough luck. Now, you are getting divorced, and you and your now ex-spouse have signed the divorce papers, which states that you agree to the final ruling and that you forfeit your ability to contest the content of that divorce in the future in any way. Two years later, your ex-spouse gets even more money because her relative died and left her a HUGE GODDAMN CHUNK of money. Now, you get into your head that you did share your inheritance with her, so she should too. But the fact is; she already paid you back in the divorce by splitting whatever assets you both shared and because both your lawyers and the judge have seen the paperwork in regards to your inheritance AND have ruled that whatever was included in the divorce paper was fair. BUT, once again; not enough detail. OP did mention she felt like she could, in theory, owe him, so maybe that is not the situation at all. This is also why you should NEVER use your inheritance for someone else, or write a post nuptial the moment you get some inheritance, because this can suck A LOT when things don't work out, which they very often do not do. Also, I did use the second person of singular in my scenario; this is not oriented towards you personally, but my scenario is written in a way that will make it feel more personal so you can understand in what position Kevin could potentially be in. And also, I added a bit of theatrical and supposition for the heck of it. I am also biased against anyone that call their mom for backup when they are adults or involved children as a mean of manipulation. If I called my mother to talk to my ex-wife, I'm pretty sure my mother would hang up the moment I uttered the sentence "Talk to her in my stead".

[@Jr-rm5vi]

Love this channel!! Some of the craziest stories

[@raerose2278]

Me too!!! ♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

[@thesacandeyt9361]

Pro same

[@breybrat6301]

Sick pfp bro

[@Jr-rm5vi]

@@breybrat6301 thanks 🙏

[@coopermoreland7513]

Agreed

[@rickmarr8784]

That last story sounds more like people putting there own locks on it and it isn't supplied by the lockers themselves. If the station and council doesn't take responsibility and kept passing it back and forth then yeah the OP should take it into his hand. There is a sign there and everything and people still ignore it. The fact that the OP had to do it and not the people in charge is just wrong.

[@amabird8418]

"Last story" And thus a new hero emerged and he was known as Steel cutter

[@thebalumnguni6708]

😂🔥N I was thinking something like lock punisher

[@Chicken.]

I think for the bike one the people used their own locks to lock the bikes as he said that one of them was a fancy lock but not the others.

[@vantao9408]

Yeah the uploader is a derp.

[@animetalk8132]

Last story about the bike vigilante I'm just say he could have did 4 or 5 to leave his mark like batman beating criminals

[@FredRated1967]

Story 1. First off, I personally think OP should've told his MIL "Look here, I realize cheating whores stick together, but if you don't shut your damn mouth, I will drag your arse out of here and slam the door behind you." And also, as soon as all the papers are signed and filed, OP should immediately go to HR and tell them what the cheater did.

[@NeoRazgriz]

“Let me introduce a 3rd party to this story”…LAWYER! Always find out your options and take away her ability to hire the top 3-5 lawyers in your area (simply by speaking to them). Also it informs/protects you from her BS in the future.

[@unicornforever4257]

Once a cheater, always a cheater! Don't ever believe them when they say "they'll change!" For them to cheat, they have zero respect for you or your relationship!

[@migbat01]

6:42 bro straight up quoted “Mr.Brightside”

[@fartshawty2301]

I didn’t even notice that lol

[@taxabledj8571]

The story with Lana, press the charges. I was arrested at 12. She is 17 so she can deal with the consequences. The bike locker one, i think they had to bring their own locks. So technically he was destroying private property, however it was honestly reasonable since they were empty.

[@spageyro4802]

"Where did all the good men go ?" "Why don't you get married ? Are you so scared of commitment ?"....There.

[@julekdrozd2736]

Sec story : tbh i would take the deal and when my son gets the car i would press charges against lana

[@jbc6980]

This is the correct answer.

[@YurideGroot]

For the final story, I believe the users of the lockers supply their own locks.

[@miciogattomatto]

story 2: you do not owe him anything, he was not obligated to share the inheritance, and from how you've said it, you didn't ask for it... also whether you owe him something or not, he cannot force you to do anything with your inheritance

[@benerval7]

trickle truth is always the last nail in the coffin.

[@alexandergonzalez1780]

I love the mr bright side reference at 6:41

[@CidVeldoril]

Legally he has no claim, that is correct. Otherwise he could sue. Morally however he does have a claim. It is unfair that she gets to profit from the fact that his dad died sooner than hers and were things the other way around she'd be resentful as well.

[@Nareimooncatt]

Presumably he shared the inheritance willingly because they were together and he felt her worth it. After the divorce, something happened that changed that dynamic. The inheritance restitution should've been handled during the divorce proceedings. Sounds like it wasn't, which was his fault for not pushing for it if he really felt that way. You have no moral obligation to share your property with anyone, much less someone you don't like. And then for him to turn her own young son against her? Any smidgen of moral claim he might have had was lost at that point anyway.

[@diagorm6254]

The lockers sound like they use personal locks so people are just putting their personal locks on them and leaving them there like assholes. He is most definitely not the asshole.

[@Danielson1818]

You have to be right. 1st, It's doubtful that the town is paying for locks on top of the lockers. 2. He confirmed the locks were different, when he described the thin expensive one that was harder to cut through. If people are just leaving private locks on public lockers, then too bad. The only part I don't agree with is taking them home. He should've tossed them in the nearest garbage can to let the point be known.

[@SpiritHawk7]

@@Danielson1818 I'm confused as to why he kept the locks too. I would have dumped them in the trash right then and there. Imagine the huge pile of useless locks he had just sitting there and how heavy it was to carry all of those locks back with him; especially the first time he cut all but like 3 of the locked bike lockers at that one station. I would have taken them to a metal recycling plant long before a decade had passed to at least get some small profit from all of that scrap metal. It'd be some form of repayment for his time and effort to do what the council should have paid him for as he was enforcing their own rule they neglected to follow through with.

[@Append_Append]

Lock-guy is the hero we need but don't deserve.

[@lauraodonoghue1348]

the last story isn’t about breaking locks that come with the locker, they use their own locks so people provide their own lock

[@Jukako.45]

This really cool i saw this in tiktok and really got into the story so thatd when i ended up here

[@Jukako.45]

Hahaha soery for the late reply, yes i did subscribe i did it intresting to listen to these like podcast i guess ill be tuning from now on

[@finalfantasylord1]

erm last story pretty sure you put your own locks on those lockers he wasn't damaging anything but locks that shouldn't have been there in the first place

[@Player2_1_0]

The lock story- YTJ. 100%. The inheritance story: I wasn't really paying attention and I thought they were still married. In that case, the husband is acting entitled, but OP would be the jerk. In this case, however, no good guys. A good solution I'm my opinion would be to open a joint account for 75% of the profits (25% for the OPs personal use) where it could only be used for the kids. Receipts or whatever proof that 100% of the purchase was for the kids required. Something good for the kids, shut the ex's face and a way to build goodwill so this kind of heated fight doesn't happen again.

[@amythystmoon864]

A car seems like a small price to pay to dodged that bullet that he could’ve ended up marrying and having kids with could you imagine having kids with that woman I shudder to think

[@mutdog2184]

Lock story guy was like the batman for bikelocks

[@shashankbajpai1328]

In the bookstore story, i would suggest setup funds for the child. For his education and for maybe a health insurance(idk how things work in her country).

[@sunnykitten815]

So actually the locks are personal locks. I’ve been to stations like them

[@chbabin]

The car story, I think they should accept the offer because jail wouldn’t do any good and put her on a worse path and it sounds like she could definitely benefit from therapy

[@annamiller8871]

Lana's bad behavior will NEVER be corrected without consequences.

[@HughMorris69]

You never shit where you eat. Workplace relationships are drama and a headache

[@vidlazniksostar5312]

The lock dude became batman

[@sarahhapka3647]

Book store story - Eff him! Dude, we are literally divorced! And I would ask him if he were to get any kind of inheritance now, would he split it with me since we are divorced? Also, I would seek out legal advice with a lawyer to make sure he can't pull any BS. I would also mention that now he is weaponizing our children against me as well.

[@shonneal]

Was that a Mr. Brightside reference I heard😂

[@talalkurdi5339]

Ppl put theyre own lock on the lockers

[@dagon20223]

Last one was good revenge

[@mridulmahato1452]

book store story: if he was not behaving like a crazy and involving his mom and their children, i would say the husband did have a claim and he said if would go to their children, that she could have discussed more instead of being dismissive. Also u could argue that he did involve them because she dismissed him point blank but they could have worked it out if she was open to discussion. I mean She did benfit from her father in law... Also the store is not doing well so he will also be responsible for it and who knows he could turn it around, and benefit both of them.

[@creocrimson836]

Being cheated on is the worst and they 100% belong to the streets. Inheritance is not something you legally have to share. You don't owe him anything. Your father gave it to you and you can do whatever you want with it. The fact he's feeding your children lies shows he doesn't deserve a dime.

[@alienrez2024]

Third story I feel that she kind of does owe him for it but only till she pays it back. Now this is assuming that they ended off in decent terms. But either way I do believe she owes him back for all that money he gave her

[@k3nnyr3ynolds]

Yeah I agree. I think You shouldn’t expect people to pay you back for anything you do for them unless they agree to or insist they will. But in this case she should pay him back or some of what she got. Ykwim?

[@k3nnyr3ynolds]

Because like her father owned the shop but he just gave her money. He doesn’t have the right to take half the shop but is right to ask for money back

[@HeavensEqualGreatSage]

I feel the inheritance story can depend a lot if it really goes to the kids and depending on your salary difference, how much you got from him/he got from you during the divorce, circumstances could really change. I feel OP was the a-hole until he got the kids involved it's kinda ESH but that guy is being too demanding but again it depends on the context of the breakup

[@marcusg.h3232]

For the book store story I think she should give him the amount of money he gave to so he has no claim to the book store

[@kerry-annjacobs6260]

Reimburse him what he gave from his inheritance.

[@pbstarwars9596]

For the story where a girl named Lana destroyed the car of OP's son, and Lana's parents offered a deal to get Lana out of facing charges then put into therapy. If I were the OP, I would agree to the deal, if the therapy in question was sending Lana to military school.

[@jalendunbar1129]

Love this channel watch all the vids

[@johnleonard3951]

I think you missed that the bike lockers locks are owned by who ever used the locker. Like a bring your own lock kind of thing.

[@alpacarulezyt4555]

Love the mister brightside refence. Love your vids keep up the good work

[@wolfdogarrow050]

On the lockers one It sounds like all he did was a pad lock

[@astahfirula]

Second story: i would make her parents a counter offer, i would accept their deal if they buy a brand new, 0 km car for him, something much more expensive than the one he had AND she would get a restraining order. Of course, the brother stays in jail.

[@pandamoon8067]

In my opinion I feel & think charge have her face the consequences facing & let her know she can’t get away with anything true they break up doesn’t mean for her to destroy OP son’s car basically play stupid game win stupid prize plus have her learn early in life there will be heartbreak self for don’t destroy people things move forward live better life don’t need to be bitter bout breakup

[@pandamoon8067]

Plus I think the girlfriend have that toxic behavior

[@maryemery2696]

The guy in the last story is going to be the batman.

[@madsfiedler3884]

6:11 her being the guys manager is HIGHLY innapropriate

[@agnieszkajarl8667]

Bookstore story: if he is playing dirty getting kids involved for his personal gain (screw his mother, but kids?!?) I would advice filling for full custody. I have feeling that's it's not the first time when he put children against mother. And you DO NOT OWE HIM ANYTHING just because you have kids together. You owe YOUR CHILDREN habits for stabile growth, roof over their head and food on their plate.

[@johnnymcneal5914]

She is not sorry that she cheated she is sorry that she got caught go ahead and lawyer up and get that divorce

[@richardgriffin2302]

If his wife cheated on him on thier honeymoon, obviously this guy does not good judgment or the ability to spot big red flags. This guys best move is to stay out of the love game. I feel bad for him thinking about how many women are going to take advantage of him before he becomes another broken man.

[@newt1701]

The guy in the last story was talking about personal padlocks that selfish people were using to reserve lockers they weren't currently using. So they're the AHs, he's the guy that was pushed too far by the selfish ignorant actions of AHs.

[@jessicaspaw528]

He can still use the lockers,he just cut the combo/key 🔒 locks off.

[@x6ppvp]

anyone notice when he began to sing mr brightside

[@swdee176]

Just came from tiktok huge fan

[@raerose2278]

I came over from TikTok too! I ♥️ Am I the Jerk! Did you subbed also?

[@halbbludiii1804]

For the second: accept the deal but press charges after it

[@AbstraktTV]

I would get my brother to tell HR, so I kept my word, I would press charges... she does owe him n she is being selfish, u don't have to share inheritance... he did the right thing looool 😂

[@TravestyEdits]

Story 1: Not the jerk, but your life would be a great drama show. I’m not trying to be rude if it comes of that way.

[@blazegaming0822]

BUT ITS TRUE

[@willm687]

In the last one I think the lockers had random pad locks on them not system of locks

[@anthonyburke5656]

S2, NTI, Lana desperately needs help, others not taking steps before put her in this position, press for criminal charges and sue for damages

[@franman6831]

6 days into the honeymoon? together 6 years?married at 26? too many patterns

[@justcallmemax4222]

For the second story I'd give them an unreasonable deal like buying them a new car in cash and then paying for the repairs to the new car and if they wouldn't accept it girl can go to jail and have something on her record the rest of her life

[@donovanwick9278]

nah she def needs jail time or boot camp instead of therapy. parents raised BOTH their children wrong

[@smoke_dogfight112]

Like the way you think.

[@realjay5539]

You press charges a get both of them on an official RO so that any future crimes are hard jail time. Most likely they’ll be fined and put on probation if first time offenders.

[@KazDragondeez]

Mr Brightside but it's a story

[@anubis9139]

On the story with the bike locks, assuming it is the same as the ones near where I live, he isn't destroying government property. He's cutting the locks the people are putting on there. He would simply have to put his own lock on and it's fine.

[@citizenpunx]

3:55 hell yea, solid brother

[@faxjndabest5032]

With the third one I wouldn’t give 50 but maybe like 30 or 40

[@makio3723]

The Apple doesn't fall far from the tree

[@newt1701]

In the 3rd story the wife is morally an AH. What she should have done, is work out how much she benefited from her husband's inheritance, and then pay him back. It's technically not illegal if she doesn't, as they're no longer married, but considering she mooched off his inheritance it would be the right thing to do to repay him the money she took. If she doesn't it's likely that she'll be seen as the bad guy, as like I said it is morally wrong, which has more weight in the court of public opinion.

[@robertscholfield4048]

He could force you to sell the shop

[@miciogattomatto]

story 1: for me, i'd press charges on anyone over 14 committing a crime against me, if they're UNDER 14, by italian law (i live in italy), the parents are criminally responsible for the child's actions (until the child turns 14) so yeah, no matter the age or gender or situation of someone: if you mess with me, i'll mess with your criminal record

[@jhs99990]

As soon as he involved the kids convincing them that their mother is a thief no way

[@Dimensionalalteration]

First one is no ones wife and finding that out kills the affection, because who even is this harlot,nothing to work out beyond her motives and how to get her tf away from him.

[@G-manFan1]

he did say what he needed to know they did the deed

[@amberbrown8052]

Story 3: if op feels like she does owe her ex some, than just make him payments (or full amount) until he his paid back what she got of his inherents.

[@justsomeguy9700]

The bike lock story, they are prob lockers that just have a hole to put a lock on not built in locks so ergo he was doing the public a favor not making it impossible for them to be used.