Very Few Christians Know THESE Facts About Dinosaurs

All Christians should know THESE important facts about dinosaurs. In this presentation, Tommy Mitchell reveals what the Bible says about dinosaurs, and emphasizes the importance of making God’s Word the foundation of your worldview.
========
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics (Christianity-defending) ministry dedicated to enabling Christians to defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ effectively.
On our KZbin channel, you’ll find answers to your most pressing questions about key issues like creation, evolution, science, the age of the earth, and social issues. We desire to train believers to develop a worldview based on the Bible and expose the bankruptcy of evolutionary ideas and their implications.
You’ll hear from top teachers such as Ken Ham, Bryan Osborne, Dr. Georgia Purdom, Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson, Tim Chaffey, Bodie Hodge, Dr. Gabriela Haynes, Dr. Terry Mortenson, and more.
Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world: AnswersinGenesis.org/give

[@SK-bw2cv]

I mean, there's a lot of things we've been lied to about. Thank God we have his word to bring us back around to truth.

[@will2003michael2003]

Your being lied to about young earth creation. The Bible is the infallible word of God but our translation is not. We don’t have a perfect understanding of the dead language of the ancient Hebrew used in gen. The word earth in Gen has there different interpretations that completely change the scope of everything. The word day, year is not clearly defined as it is today. Also we are not sure of the genre of the book of genesis, which makes a huge difference. Don’t waste your time worrying about this stuff, the dirty secret is if evolution is true, genesis is no less right then if it’s not. It’s a matter of translation.

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

You were lied to by Tommy MItchell IN THIS VIDEO. DIrect lies. He's a liar.

[@user-hh3cz1km6h]

@@StudentDad-mc3pu Proof, please.

[@cufflink44]

Ikr, right? I mean, they told us snakes couldn't talk, but God's word says they can! And they said people couldn't live to over 900 years old, but God's word tells us they can! HALLELUJAH!!!

[@user-hh3cz1km6h]

SK, wow, did the narcissists come out shrieking at you! :) I love it. Keep up the good work!

[@joshmonroe986]

The average 'christian' has allowed himself to be shamed by the unbelievers for believing the word of God.

[@alantasman8273]

@@nathancook2852 Which is why evolutionists should read the scriptures.

[@jockyoung4491]

@@alantasman8273 What do the scriptures have to do with evolution? Evolution is science. It says NOTHING about faith. The two are unrelated.

[@claudevalade666]

@alantasman8273 And Christians should rrad a biology textbook

[@jonde3]

Andrew Tate mindset

[@100thAnniversary]

​@jockyoung4491 Evolution is science..? Are you a scientist? No. So you believe what SOMEONE ELSE said, ablut a subject you know nothing about, and trust an author that says he was there? And that doesn't require faith?? 😂 You sound as crazy as the "Christians" you look down on. Absolutely hilarious...

[@garryl6594]

There are lots of things we’ve been lied about, gods being thousands of them.

[@PoeLemic]

Or, better yet, we've been lied to about the existence of any gods. Nothing exists other than what is observable and proveable.

[@chuckyz457]

Thank you for covering this subject.

[@friisteching3433]

Honest: shaping your worldview based on the evidence. Dishonest: shaping the evidence based on your worldview.

[@christopheespic]

Hence, this video is dishonest 😉.

[@ryans8081]

Hence Evolution is dishonest, because whenever evidence comes up that would suggest millions of years is wrong, such as soft tissue and Carbon-14 in dinosaur bones, or rapid canyon-like erosion and fossilization after the Mount St. Helens eruption, they will incorporate it into their millions of years worldview rather than admit that millions of years is wrong and the earth is young.

[@wichitadisciple9874]

Sounds like everyone is guilty of that. It’s not about evidence, it’s about how you interpret the evidence.

[@jockyoung4491]

@@wichitadisciple9874 Indeed. And in science the interpretation is presented to everybody using evidence and logic, so anyone can evaluate it for themselves. That's how science works. That's why it is self-correcting.

[@tone9358]

@@wichitadisciple9874That's what everyone who's ever been wrong about the evidence has said.

[@nathanbattles3958]

Before I married my dear Wife I dated a micro biologist who was renowned in her field. She was Christian and one day I asked what her view was as a scientist of evolution. I was a lowly man who earned a living carrying a rifle so I would love to hear from someone with more education then my self on this topic. She was very wise and advised that just because I was a soldier it doesn’t mean I’m dumb. Just I didn’t have her opportunities. Her answer on evolution was simple and smart. The basis of evolution is one species turns into another. It started as single called organisms supposedly. In all her years of looking through a microscope she has never witnessed this and neither has any other microbiologist.

[@RePlayQ]

The E. Coli long term evolution experiment has been running at the University of California for 35 years. With this experiment, researchers have been able to watch evolution happen in real time. So either your ex was really ignorant or she was just trying to save your feelings.

[@nathanbattles3958]

@@RePlayQ she was a lead micro biologist at the George Mason Repository, she knows her stuff. Since then I earn my two medical science degrees. The experiment you mention actually proves my point and you don’t realize it. They have over 75 thousand generations and they are still E Coli! Mutations are not evolution. For evolution to occur they would have to turn into something other then E Coli. All they have done is breed a more resilient form of the same bacteria. When they have have them become another organism or a multi-cell organism then they will prove evolution, I do not believe they will succeed.

[@nathanbattles3958]

@@RePlayQyou actually proved my point and didn’t know it. They have over 75k generations of E Coli involved with this experiment. However it’s still E Coli. It has mutated and become more resilient but it’s still E Coli. There experiment has not had any evolution at all. In order to prove evolution the E Coli would have to turn into something else. For instance become a protozoan or better yet a multi celled organism. As for that young lady she was a lead micro biologist at the George Mason Repository.

[@raito1239]

Sounds like your wife was lying to you. I wonder what else she is lying about.😂

[@nathanbattles3958]

@@raito1239 the use of ad hominem’s means you have no facts. Also your reading comprehension needs work my friend.

[@MiguelTiempos]

I just could not tune away from this Video!!! Running late but finished it!!!

[@conniebaughman9894]

Dear Sir you make many good points . Thanks for your understanding and great humor, how you put things! It lightens up the topic with out putting people to sleep 👍

[@chronolynx360]

That's because the Bible speaks the truth time after time.

[@markduell2468]

It really doesn't. But, I know you have been conditioned to think that.

[@rg442]

@@markduell2468 Fantastic rebuttal Mark. Chef's kiss. Bravo.

[@johngraves9237]

​@@markduell2468 So how much of the Bible have you read? What part of the Word of God is not true?

[@claudevalade666]

​@johngraves9237 it's not the word of god

[@ECLECTRIC_EDITS]

Atheists believe in nonsense. IE: Eternal nonsensation after death. Non, sense!

[@Littleking1985]

They made artist Renditions of elephants hippos and cats just based off the skeleton and it is nothing like what the animals really look like. So the way we picture dinosaurs today is probably nothing like what they really look like. Except for the ones that are completely preserved even the skin like that armored dinosaur found not too long ago

[@crappyanimations9992]

Could you be more specific? All artist renditions of elephants, hippos, and cats that I know come from "All Yesterdays." We're definitely off with the soft tissue and color, but the scientific research that goes into the reconstruction of the more popular dinosaurs basically makes it impossible for us to be far off. We have the weight, muscle, texture, and shape right, all that we're missing is color and body fat.

[@Littleking1985]

@crappyanimations9992 ok and your evidence is? Can you be more specific since you said "we" I'm assuming you have personally pieced together an extinct animal no one has ever seen before based solely on incomplete fossil fragments.

[@toldyouso5588]

Yes, I wonder too about brain capacity of such large monster carnivors. Did they speak a language? What kind of complex social structure? The whales do and so do elephants. We have even been able to identify some of their animal sound languages. I even once taught my dog to vocalize a few human words like say "I love you" so did Alexander Grahm Bell. The Bible describes such reptilian dragon beings as powerfull, intelligent and destructive to man. I trust the Bible account near there in time than any farthest away in modernity. It's the old Chinese whispers in play.

[@Woopor]

Yes, we figured that out 20 years ago, just look at paleo art for 5 seconds and you’ll see how artists have been taking liberties and imagining the creatures based more on other animals and less on their skeleton alone for years now

[@crappyanimations9992]

@@toldyouso5588 They didn't have complex enough vocal systems to speak. They could probably communicate the same way most modern animals do. Sauropods, hadrosaurs, some theropods, and more likely had complex-ish social groups. And finally, the more intelligent dinosaurs (mostly theropods) might of had simple languages (dolphins and bees), but most likely not. All of your questions have answers, and evidence to back them up. You don't have to just make guesses based on a story book 😭

[@Long-HairedLuigi]

I've been saying this again and again. There's also evidence to suggest that in the UK area that some remaining dinosaurs may have still been around, only back then they were called "dragons".

[@jockyoung4491]

Um, no there isn't.

[@user-hh3cz1km6h]

@@jockyoung4491 Any proof of that?

[@joshuakohlmann9731]

​@user-hh3cz1km6h Any proof of what? That there's no evidence? That's not how it works, my friend. I can't stand up and say, "Abraham Lincoln was an alien", be met with the perfectly reasonable objection that there's no evidence for that, and then reply with "Prove there's no evidence!" - at least not if I wanted to be taken seriously. It would be up to me to provide evidence for my assertion in the first place.

[@vikingskuld]

Soft tissues is all the fact you need to know they were here just a few thousand years ago. Over 200 soft tissue finds in fossils said by quackademics to be 65 to 500 million years old.... we know the Collagen blood cells, blood vessels, and even Actin don't last a million years. That's all the proof smart people need but for some of you others. They have found C14 in dinosaur fossils, coal, and diamonds, C14 ...... Do you not get that c14 can't be even a million years old. So its pretty much a fact man walked around with Dragons/Dinosaurs you honestly have to be an obtuse Moron to deny it. At this point to deny it would be lying.

[@bradleyperry1735]

Dragons are more real than dinosaurs.

[@jamesalexanderkaraba7037]

Thank you God for using this man full of your knowledge to satisfy my cravings, may God bless you.

[@stibbo]

You are being lied to

[@ronjones4069]

Please read any modern scientific explanation about evolution and you will see that he is totally misrepresenting how evolution really works. . he is totally misrepresenting and he is doing so knowingly.

[@K8SSN]

Good to see videos from my friend, Tommy.

[@tacticalsnoopy]

Truly enjoyed the video

[@anthonylowder6687]

Not only do we have their fossils but in the ancient Aztec and other sites there are stone carvings that resemble dinosaurs which means that man and dinosaurs existed side by side.🦖🦕

[@nonononononono8532]

Did they see the dinosaurs? Or did they see the dinosaur fossils?

[@howarddavid31]

The fossils have already been proven to be fake. There is not one fully complete fossil of any large “dinosaur” . It’s all BS

[@juanwononeyuan]

dinosaurs still exist sort of, some species of crocodilia and sharks and others have evolved very little over the past few million years since upright hominids. if their environment and food sources remain fairly constant there is little selection pressure to adapt.

[@raymoss706]

Which ancient Aztec site has stone carvings that resemble dinosaurs? Because I've never seen them.

[@user-uv2yl6cm4c]

99 percent of every species ever lived have not been discovered and most probably never will which in that case they could be animals we don't know about at all and had sadly went extinct. The point is that there's an percent chance that it was dinosaurs that we know of at least.

[@EmpressNatiLocs]

Loved this talk! Utterly fascinating ❤

[@stibbo]

None of this is true you are being lied to

[@catfrab]

😂

[@canthony1900]

My daughter loves dinosaurs 🦕. We purchased several Ken Ham dinosaur books. She absolutely loves them. We love them too.

[@claudevalade666]

That poor kid.. Why not buy her real books about dinosaurs so she won't get laughed at when she says dinosaurs and humans lived together.. That's so sad that you're robbing your kid of knowledge and indoctrinating her

[@Woopor]

@@claudevalade666 Jurassic park has more accurate depictions of dinosaurs than these creationists

[@Mothobius]

Let her watch prehistoric planet. Don't show her those pieces of garbage. Your not showing her true dinosaurs

[@nathanballentyne]

I'm glad your child is curious, but you're setting her up to be disappointed and humiliated. So maybe be careful and teach her the truth, not just what you want the truth to be.

[@kamiliakhaksa5290]

if ur daughter loves them let her learn about them.

[@barbaragonzales5944]

This was awesome!! I love his presentation style. 😃

[@christopheespic]

Sad that the content isn't on par....

[@TheDriller571]

Interesting . I have worked In Exploration Core Drilling since 1979 and worked in several Countries. I have seen sedimentary Rock in The Andes at 15000 feet and at lower areas in North America including Alaska,the West Coast of Canada and the U.S. I have Drilled Sandstone in the North West Territories and the Sedimentary Basin in Canada where I grew up and throughout different States in the U.S. Dinosaur Bones were found in Farmfields in parts of Canada and they have a really good exhibit in the Museum of Man and Nature in Winnipeg Manitoba.I have worked in areas where trenches were used for digging for Mineral Deposits about 30 to 40 years prior. In that time the Vegetation in the trenches turned to a layer Topsoil that was about 3 inches deep. I have Seashells in Sedimentary Rock from a depth of 400 feet. I had pieces of Wood from 800 feet in Alaska. I have been to areas in Washington State where if you dug down about 4 inches you would find Ash from the Mount St. Hellens eruption. The Sedimentary Basin that I grew up in usually had about 100 feet of Overburden and after that it was Limestone to about 500 feet and 50 feet of Sandstone and Clay. From that depth it was Hard Volcanic Rock. These Scientists who talk about millions or billions of years seem to forget that Bones deteriorate and turn to dust in time. There is a lot more that I have learned in my line of work and the areas that I have worked. Things I have learned from my work could easily prove these Scientists wrong. This might be another of my comments that KZbin deletes. They have deleted some of my comments on certain subjects. Kind of like they are calling me a liar. Anyway,people are about to learn the truth about Evolution.

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

In the whole comment you did not really make a point - can you actually put into words you evidence and what you think it means? Are you saying fossilisation does not happen because we do have millions of them on shelves of museums and in pravate collections including mine.

[@TheDriller571]

@@StudentDad-mc3pu So, what do you want to be pointed out. I explained where I have worked,what I have seen that proves that Evolution can be contested . It’s all right in front of you and it doesn’t take a Rocket Scientist to understand that Evolution is just a Hypothetical Theory.

[@StudentDad-mc3pu]

@@TheDriller571 No, you have not produced an argument, you just stated a lot of things you had seen - you did not explain what you believe they meant or how they 'prooved' evolution was false. When I say I observe that the oldest layers contain the simplest creatures, none of which are alive today - I can say I believe that is because life evolved from simple to complex and these older forms went extinct. When I say I see solid rock that has been folded so it is verticle, I can say I believe that this was done over a very long period of time using geological processses. What hypothesis are you putting forwards to explain what you saw. I don't doubt that you saw it.

[@TheDriller571]

@@xqka11 I guess what I am saying is that Scientists say that Dinosaurs are Millions or Billions of Years Old. It’s hard to believe that bones can be Millions to Billions of Years Old and not Oxidized and turned into Dust. There are too many things that are based on Theory and the idea that everything came from a single Cell is really hard to believe even with the Neanderthal Fossils. From some of the things that I have seen, it seems that Evolution happens fast.

[@tbong9293]

Very informative, thank you!

[@duradim1]

Thank you for the lecture. I do prefer a slower pace, especially when showing pictures. I like time to digest things. But if this is what you must do to keep people engaged, so be it.

[@wuznotbornyesterda]

You can slow it down. Click on settings. Playback speed. I watch most things sped up. This is good. But you can go at whatever is comfortable for you. 😊

[@ericamassey1112]

Answers In Genesis, thank you so much for sharing this! I forgot how much I love hearing Dr. Tommy Mitchell! God bless you, AIG!

[@claudevalade666]

Yes thanks AIG for lying to our faces and giving us the divine gift of confirmation bias

[@ericahoward1059]

Book Enoch

[@EvolutionArtTheoryBiggestLies]

Dinosaur were never real caused just Atheist idea trying make imagination Skin are made of Design Color and Bone was made of Art by Expert Artist, What a Joke, Dinosaur is Fiction and Never real You are Trolled and Fooled by Fraud Atheist There is no Gods a mere Mortal Human are Myth are Not exist Because only One God Myth the Spirit and Almighty Creator are Real and Exist@@ericahoward1059

[@The_Lord_has_it]

The thing is guys, we already know this all MUST be true because once God has found you, there's no denying it. Unfortunately, no amount of evidence will convince an unbeliever until that happens.

[@Gek1177]

But nothing this channel says about science is true. So that leaves two options. Either AiG is wrong about God or God doesn't exist.

[@jockyoung4491]

Science has nothing to do with whether God exists or not. Science is not a threat to faith.

[@bite-sizedshorts9635]

@@Gek1177 It's all true and provable.

[@Gek1177]

@@bite-sizedshorts9635 what's true is that what AiG says is factually false which means that either AiG's interpretation of scripture is false or God is false.

[@cipherklosenuf9242]

Without supernatural beliefs can science still reach evidence based conclusions ?

[@c.leeyoung4678]

Thank you for that presentation I loved it may Jesus Christ bless you

[@SkeebosGaming]

Christians must have biblical wisdom and the courage to stand in the truth of God's word.

[@user-on3wh6wu9n]

Why should I accept the word of any fiction, including the word of your fictional god?

[@not2zen]

You don’t have to believe, you have a free will however, one day you will believe that God is who He said He is, it’s better for you if you do it now with your own free will. God gives us all that choice.

[@user-on3wh6wu9n]

@@not2zen "one day you will believe that God is who He said He is, it’s better for you if you do it now". Your god is a fiction. I am amused by the emptiness of your threat against me.

[@eugeneoisten9409]

If you had this Biblical wisdom, you wouldn't actually be a Christian. As there is no truth in your gawds word!

[@eugeneoisten9409]

​@@not2zen. Nope you can't have an omniscient god and free will at the same time.

[@workingmothercatlover6699]

I listened to this video while driving home from work, so I didn't see any of the images shown. When talking about the T-Rex being a carnivore, one thought came to mind. Cats are carnivores, dogs are carnivores. But I've known some of both of them who loved fruit. And how often do cats and dogs go outside to eat grass? Despite what science says, you can't really know what type of food something eats based solely on the teeth.

[@WarriorInAGarden.]

🙏🙌

[@Woopor]

Yeah you can lol. Dogs and cats like eating fruit, but do they live off it? No, it’s just a treat. T Rex’s teeth are perfect for a predator, and everything else about it is, too. It’s front facing eyes for depth perception, its large nose area for smelling prey, it’s massive legs for chasing prey, it’s tail for balance as it runs after them, it is clearly a predator

[@razark9]

'Despite what science says' Lol. So 'nuh-uh'? Teeth are good indicators of a creatures diet, but they're not the only ones for determining an animal's diet.

[@Starbuckin]

@@WooporPanda bear has all that and is only a plant eater, the joke is on you and people that think like you.

[@doughoward7183]

Bears.

[@Dani-pz5nx]

This is a great video. Ty and God bless 🙏🏻

[@Kaotik199O]

Short legs and little feet make me chuckle 😅😅 He’s a smart but soft hearted man! God bless him

[@aliandra8476]

This has been coming up lately ❤ thank God

[@donp1088]

What a wonderful job of teaching!

[@jockyoung4491]

This is not how you teach; this is how you indoctrinate.

[@Countryboy071]

What complete indoctrination, without real science. It's nothing but comedy 😂😂😂

[@nonprogrediestregredi1711]

Please learn critical thinking skills. This is pure tripe meant, in large part, to satisfy the confirmation bias of those who choose not to hold their superstitious beliefs up to scrutiny.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

Amen 🙏🙏🙏

[@Countryboy071]

@@newcreationinchrist1423 carry on reading the bible. In the meantime what are you're thoughts on the crusades? Justice perhaps (again) ?

[@Kimberly-Fredrick]

This was absolutely awesome Thank you for sharing ❤

[@krystal6612]

So glad I found your channel❤ praise the LIRD OF LORDS THE KING OF KINGS MOST HIGHT❤❤❤❤

[@Ginger_FoxxVT]

Fascinating! I'd never thought of it like that

[@Kielforreal]

I believe in creation. This presentation answered many questions. Makes much sense.

[@ancataut7891]

Are you serious?! Earth is older than the Sun and the stars?! Did grass and trees grow on earth before the existence of the Sun? Do these obvious untruths "make sense" to you?! How many school grades did you take? Have you ever heard about the term "manipulation"? Read some books about this field!

[@RealHooksy]

The presentation made zero sense. It was complete rubbish

[@timothyirwin8974]

You know, one of the signs of the second coming, is that the stars will fall out of the sky and land on Earth. To even write that means you do not know what stars are. So much for the "science" of the bible.

[@bite-sizedshorts9635]

@@ancataut7891 No one said that grass and trees grew before the existence of the sun. They were created just before the sun. Do you really think a tree would die if it had no sunshine for just a day or two? You are the one who has been manipulated.

[@i7Qp4rQ]

​@@RealHooksyA red herring fallacy isn't an argument.

[@edwardwicks304]

This was a delightful video. Thank you for the insightful information.

[@razark9]

This is not informational. It's propaganda for christians with a bone to pick with science, educated people and outsiders in general. It's deliberate misinformation to skew the facts to fit the apologist narrative of the day.

[@Acoustic-Rabbit-Hole]

The other half of the info is in another old Jewish text that was removed from the Bible by the Catholic Church in about 300 AD: The Book of Enoch.

[@kevinwalsh4652]

I want you to use a Pythagorean numerology calculator, type in: Darwin, then Big Bang...do you "see?" An NFL extra point is exactly 33 yards, NFL founder Walter Camp #322 Skull & Bones, get it now?

[@list1726]

Thanks for posting

[@prodson8310]

Thank you for a great video. Thanks be to God

[@christinedenton8949]

Thank you!!!

[@gerardsymonette8906]

This is a dynamic, logical, biblical presentation.

[@joshuakohlmann9731]

It's utterly illogical. He contradicts himself on the subject of interpreting evidence within LITERALLY the first minute.

[@jacobostapowicz8188]

​@@joshuakohlmann9731nothing is as contradictory as evolution theory, and i will actually demonstrate unlike you,, They teach that plants and trees evolved to produce the vast array of fruits and vegetables, herbs and spices, fungi and tree nuts as BENEFICIAL characteristics,, Simultaneously other plants evolve needles and thorns, poison and other defense mechanisms to their benefit. How do you rationalize this contradiction internally? How do plants invent flavors? How do others invent poison?

[@Krutchly]

@@jacobostapowicz8188 That is a perfect response - from somebody who has no idea how evolution works!

[@jockyoung4491]

With emphasis on biblical. It is ridiculous on science.

[@jockyoung4491]

@@jacobostapowicz8188 Different traits are beneficial in different environments. Next question?

[@Jesusandmentalhealth]

Great video and perspective!!

[@danipianoarts]

This is the first good explanation I've heard on this

[@tremblingone4269]

I have often wondered if there is a connection between the week of creation - including the 7th day of rest, and a circle. All of the 7 days were the same length. If you take 7 circles all the same size and put 1 in the center, then put the other 6 all around the center circle - they all touch together perfectly with no gaps. It doesn't matter the size of the circles as long as they are all the same size. Thanks for pointing out the distinction that a fossil tells us about the PRESENT!❤

[@toldyouso5588]

That is amazing, thank you for that. God is the engineer of His own creation so His natural laws and measures would certainly apply to it.

[@toldyouso5588]

I have contemplated the geometry before looking down the chamber of an old colt revolver, exactly 6 round cylinders and space for a 7th at the center. I never thought of the Sabath connection until you brought it up.

[@misslogical90]

This makes sense and is very interesting.

[@lisaallen695]

What I've believed all along. I am so glad someone is preaching and teaching this!

[@hongotedesco8931]

Too bad, because what you've believed all along......is wrong. And so is this presentation.

[@VentureXD]

@@hongotedesco8931prove it then. Don’t click on a religious video and comment telling people what they believe is wrong and provide no further explanation. Don’t be so petty

[@hongotedesco8931]

@@VentureXD A religious video? With the title of "Very few christians know these facts about dinosaurs"? First thing, "facts about dinosaurs" is a scientific issue. It's not christian, atheist, or whatever. Second, a monstrous error is "6 24 hr days of creation". Nope. It took millions of years for the Earth to turn from a hot rocky mess to a planet with water. And it goes on and on. Don't try to tell me that I can't speak out against disinformation about science. Just don't.

[@catfrab]

😂

[@hongotedesco8931]

@@VentureXD Religious video? With "facts about dinosaurs"? These facts are irrespective of whatever religious belief you have (or don't have). And wrong because right at the start he claims the earth was created in 6 literal 24hr days. Nope. It took several million years for the earth to transition from a hot mess of rock, to a planet with water.

[@robertawalton3949]

thank you for sharing this creation information!

[@coreysingletary8211]

This was excellent and thorough

[@kimaniwilliams6344]

I have never had one Christians worry about dinosaur when it comes to the bible

[@EdWin-on7pg]

Because they are serving the fake god that own this miserable world with old and silver. All of yours are so blind that think monkey man went space 😡😡👎🐍 Por eso le habló en parábolas era una pérdida de tiempo 🤣🤣. There is 2 seeds on this prison called Planet Earth, haven't find out that the word plane without t means the same thing plane(Flat). Would like to keep telling you things but you will stone me, the same way they already did to the Messiah EMMANUEL!!!! Lizard people HE the Messiah told them sons of vipers, only the work of your father want it to do. 👎🐍 Did you understand something?? If not, start to worry viper🐍👎

[@richk3607]

You don't understand the importance of science to support bible

[@CiscoWes]

​@@richk3607 It’s a false dichotomy to try to pit science against God. It’s like having to make a decision between Henry Ford and the Model T to explain the automotive industry.

[@terezka5340]

Behemot

[@dustencross357]

Science is God ​@@CiscoWes

[@bwtv147]

So humans and dinosaurs lived side by side 6,000 years ago. Fred Flinstone and Alley Oop are historical documents.

[@davidjackson2690]

Yeah, they did.

[@chuppoacobra]

Never heard it put quite like this. Interesting and very reasonable.

[@willa2365]

Excellent presentation.

[@jozuzl1]

This was a great analysis. I agree with the concept of extinction as we still see and cause species to go extinct without a major earth shattering event. One question I have is if dinosaurs coexisted with man shouldn’t we have more documentation of them throughout history besides 1 accounts in a mountain?

[@jockyoung4491]

Nobody with any understanding of reality thinks humans ever coexisted with dinosaurs.

[@jozuzl1]

@@jockyoung4491 I don’t know if my assertion is completely correct. For instance humans coexisted with the wooly mammoth and idk how much humans documented that. Also, the mammoth did go extinct and humans went on living. 🤔

[@alantasman8273]

Soft dinosaur tissue has not been found at dig sites on five continents. The soft tissues exposed through mild acids were found to include blood vessels and cells, collagen, erythrocytes, and even partial DNA. This soft tissue should not exist after 65 million years. Dinosaur tracks walking parallel with human tracks have been found on a dried out riverbed in Glenn Rose Texas. Peruvian Ica Burial Stones going back hundreds of years and Mexican Acambara figures show anatomically correct renditions of dinosaurs. Petroglyphs depicting dinosaurs have also been found on cave walls around the world. There is much evidence for dinosaurs living with man.

[@user-xp4fm2st8u]

@jozuzl1 There are many cave drawings of humans interacting with Mammoths because THEY DID! There are NO cave drawings of humans interacting with dinosaurs because they DID NOT EVEN EXIST at the same time.

[@Dawnchaser115]

Thank you for continuing to do God’s work, Answers and Genesis!

[@Pre_Vee_et]

Greta job! Kent Hovind has been preaching this for decades. I strongly recommend looking into him for more info on all these topics

[@brianc81]

Kent Hovind is a Heretic and preaches a false gospel that saves no-one

[@robertrogers6650]

I would love to hear your thoughts on the gap. I feel like the gap is totally scriptural.

[@rachaelc5516]

This makes complete sense up to a point, but what confuses me is if all dinosaurs became extinct AFTER the Ark what did happen to them? If it was a meteor how did humans and all other animals survive? I might well be asking a stupid question and have missed something obvious but if someone could give me an answer that would be great. I’m Christian youth leader, I’m genuinely after a helpful response.

[@jonathanw1106]

You won't get one lol none of this makes any sense

[@ryans8081]

There's a brass carving of two sauropod dinosaurs on Richard Bell's tomb in Carlisle Cathedral, completed in 1496, and a stone carving of a Stegosaurus in Ta Prohm temple in Cambodia, completed circa 1200, so some dinosaurs had to have lived with humans as late as 530 years ago, but they became extinct due to climate change erasing their swamps, and humans may have also killed them due to being perceived as a threat, or for sport, which is the same reason so many other animals have gone extinct recently.

[@thomasbritt5265]

I believe in the hovind theory before the tax fraud prison and divorce.

[@chronolynx360]

Because the meteor never did happen 65 million years ago. We as Christian already debunked against evolution. They don't want to accept to truth in the Bible as if the scientist and archeologist tells the kids here's what really happened the book of evolution in class. It's all lies, trying to deceived them all. God is real and so the Bible. 🇨🇦🇵🇭🙏

[@dkilian3609]

There are many unanswered questions believing Gen 1:1 happened 6000 years ago. The theory that all continents used to be one earth mass yet tectonic plates drift 1.5cm per year. Many geographical questions cannot be answered within a time span of 6000 years.

[@rebeccacurtis6680]

"When cats reproduce they UNFORTUNATELY have...". Lol. Someone is definitely NOT a cat person. 😂 Great video, though.

[@garygreen3183]

I used to think like, but I went a lot further back in history, and found more real evidence, of so much more of a great story, that come together greatly.!!!

[@LilCasinoMusic]

I am not trying to troll or anything. I have been really getting into Gods word this year. But my understanding of how dinosaurs are dated are based on the sediment level that fossils are found or using radioactive decay.

[@philspades2228]

Thank you. Please ask your editors to reduce unnecessary continuous background music to lectures. Thanks

[@razark9]

Don't think they're about to cut the music. It's part of the propaganda and appeal to your emotions.

[@crusaderknight6928]

​@@razark9 It literally not. 😔

[@razark9]

@@crusaderknight6928 AiG is 110% dedicated to producing christian propaganda, nothing else.

[@user-hh3cz1km6h]

@@razark9 You mean like all those cartoon characters, fairy tales, and mocking for the blind faith of evo sheep? Hardly. It helps if you know science, and scientists, something you do not.

[@user-hh3cz1km6h]

@@crusaderknight6928 Think of him as comic relief. He's here to troll, to mock, and promote blind faith in cartoon characters. He knows nothing about science, he just falls to his knees in a daze. People like that accept the word of other uneducated haters.

[@lodollar23]

Wow! So refreshing to hear such a brilliant mind. Well done sir!

[@fohrum4757]

"Brilliant mind" 😂

[@Mimi-ln1pm]

@@fohrum4757 🤣😂

[@SRose-vp6ew]

Our family works in medical science, we have enjoyed going to the Ark Encounter and creation Museum in Northern Kentucky. It’s worth a three day trip. So many scientists don’t believe the theories that evolutionists make their beliefs. If you have questions, take it seriously and spend 3 days actually checking out what scientist and historians have to say where they don’t deny written history or the evidence yet it’s still points to scripture being completely accurate. I personally know a little bit of Hebrew (and Latin but that’s not relevant) but it’s the Holy Spirit when you read scripture that helps you understand, but if there ever is a point where you are having a hard time, going to the Hebrew makes it so much clearer and not as cartoonish sounding. For example, yes Scripture says Eve was taken from Adam, the actual word used is a word that’s translated two ways one is rib one as side. Most people agree that we should use the word rib, but if when you read scripture The Lord might enlighten you in an understanding through humility that is only proven the more you know with things like history, language, and science. There are people that believe Noah only had two of each animal on the ark, that’s because people don’t read scripture for themself, they look at artistic interpretation created for children and that’s where they get their understanding of God instead of actually going to God and Dead Sea Scrolls proven ancient writings that have not been tampered with.

[@SRose-vp6ew]

If you’re looking to read scripture English standard version is a literal translation that’s easy enough to read. I would actually encourage people to start reading scripture with Isaiah 53, followed up by John 1-3, Romans 1-3, and then Genesis 1-3. It would take half an hour. But you have to do it humbly as fear the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, the creator of the universe who holds our life in his hands needs to be taken seriously.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

Amen 🙏🙏🙏✝️

[@tella117]

Thank you!

[@SoundKilterStudio]

Again with this! I absolutely love that he is pointing out the truth of Gods word and preaching that we MUST base our worldview from the scriptures, Gods Word. And Genesis is the bedrock of a biblical worldview. But there is not a single time in Genesis, or anywhere else in the Bible, does it mention SPACE! I mean if we are going to preach about not allowing secular, antichrist based worldviews to pervert and corrupt our biblical worldviews, then we must be consistant and strict about it. Or else were getting nowhere by continuing to twist and add to Gods Word. With that said, I still love the video and what he stands for. God bless him.

[@derrickbowlin1726]

To God a day is 1000 years . And 1000 years is a day

[@joem2747]

How did plants survive 1000 years before the sun was created the next "day?"

[@terencejay8845]

God dust. @@joem2747

[@williamgroce6262]

The evening and morning was the first day etc

[@scottpatrick801]

I've always wondered if they were somehow connected to the Nephilim

[@ghostshirt1984]

They never were! Just animals...

[@toldyouso5588]

In the book of Enoch there were the nephelim and the monsters. God commanded Enoch (before Noah) to tell those species of their sentence of world flood destruction for sin of "miscegenation." A bastard genetic corrupted species. Genetic from the word "Genesis" origin of creation. God explained, I will destroy with flood because of all the flesh that was corrupted. Misce-gena-tion, the gene was "miscarried" by the evil genetic manipulation of the fallen angels. I believe that some/most/all of the dinosaurs were those monsters God did not intend. Who engineered them? The enemies did.

[@JohnCooperWilliam]

A few people have spoken about the fallen angels corrupting animal genetics as well as human genetics. It’s a possibility!

[@user-hh3cz1km6h]

@@ghostshirt1984 Donno, Nephew. It's food for thought. walk in beauty

[@brianbrooks5404]

The reason why the flood happened was to wipe out wickedness. The nephilim were a part of that wickedness

[@lordmavbmp]

a rhino going extinct is 1 type of animal. to have every single dinosaur gone but they were flyers, swimmers, and walkers, is almost impossible.

[@catfrab]

Not if there was a cataclysmic global climate change. Suggesting it could all happen by a flood is more ridiculous.

[@marechuber]

Its like going to a doctor these days. Each doctor you see gives a different diagnosis.

[@grassroot011]

One is described by God in the Book of Job, Behemoth, read that one. He says, consider Behemoth, as God knows Job has seen it.

[@stevecox8066]

I've always wondered about how dinosaurs fit into our world's history. Thank you very much.

[@christopheespic]

They don't fit into human's history....

[@christopherlaney4694]

​@@christopheespicexactly

[@lisafeck1537]

In everything, our foundation is God's Word.

[@Twortortle]

To be fair about the magnetic shift, that would cause tectonic shift and unmatched destruction, not because it would affect the animals directly, but that's probably what happened during the flood to produce the modern landscape.

[@jockyoung4491]

For decades creationists have dishonestly misrepresented that quote by Gould on transitional fossils out of context. I met Gould. My brother worked in his lab. You have no idea how annoyed he would get when that kind of crap was pulled. And here they are still doing it. Gould was talking about a specific kind of transitional fossil, and a different time scale than is applied here. Of course he knew that there were many transitional fossils between groups in the fossil record.

[@davidjackson2690]

Can Gould, or you point to a transitional species? If evolution was true we would be tripping over the fossils of such creatures. Your Emperor has no clothes.

[@jockyoung4491]

@@davidjackson2690 Yes, there are thousands of transitional fossils, as anyone with even a basic science education would know. There are whales with non-functional legs and snakes with legs, The transition from reptiles to mammals shows every stage in great detail. We have over 250,000 species of fossils, all arranged in time showing obvious progression of form over hundreds of millions of years. Biological evolution has overwhelming evidence. Look for yourself, or remain ignorant.

[@chriss7845]

Question, is the creation in Genesis, on Earth time or Heaven time?

[@barbaramariemua]

I think time was different back then, considering people lived up to 800-900 years old back then. As time went on time sort of shortened in a way, or we diminished physically faster

[@chriss7845]

@@barbaramariemua Thanks Barbra.

[@Dan-eo9mk]

​@@barbaramariemuaBoth I think maybe true, but definitely the latter. If you look at the theory that light may not be a constant in an expanding Universe. I also think when Adam and Eve were created, obviously their Genes were perfect and no disease within them. As reproduction takes place loss of information in human Genes and faults slowly take place. After the Flood this seems to have speed up because life expectancy reduced more due to some change possibly in the environment. I think a good simile of this is, if you start with a perfect picture but take a photo of this to reproduce it and continue to take a photo of the new photo. Every time a new photo is taken their will be a slight loss of original information and possibly a replication of a fault like a piece of dust in one of the pictures. Each new picture will never be as good as the previous.

[@dustinwilson627]

My question to atheists is, if life on earth is billions of years old, then why is there death, wouldn't life have had enough time to evolve death out of the equation? I love this channel and all the work that the creation musem and ark encounter does, i really wish they could produce animal documentaries

[@petersonzander]

As someone who has taken the old earth view because it's just what I've been taught, how do young earth creationists explain how we can see light from stars millions of light-years away? (It would have taken millions of years to get here) How do young earth creationists counter tree ring dating (which I've been told goes back at least 10,000 years)?

[@user-dt2hp9wy5q]

My interpretation is that there's a separation in the periods if time between the first verse, "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth" and the second verse. It could very well be that God spent millions of years in heaven (in which time Lucifer fell) before He created the land and life on earth. As for tree rings, it could be that it was much easier for plants to grow in the time of Eden, either because of the mists that used to water the plants of the earth in Genesis 2:6 or because of 3:17 in which the ground was cursed and Adam cursed to eat bread by the sweat of his brow. Probably both. I hope this gave you something to think about, and I hope you have a blessed day :)

[@danielbixel8633]

The title of this channel tells you everything you need to know. “Answers in Genesis”. You start with a conclusion that Genesis is correct and you Taylor the story to fit your conclusion.

[@alantasman8273]

Taylor the story...are you referring to Taylor not so swift?

[@tone9358]

@@alantasman8273Yes AiG Taylor Swift science to fit a literal bible interpretation.

[@wingednut2283]

Insert boring misspelling joke because i cant form pattern recognition in someones words.

[@crystalclearwindowcleaning3458]

Well done straightforward explanation of how to understand dinosaurs.

[@Dungshlawg]

“They’re looking at the same evidence” = I don’t understand fossil dating. It’s like using a gram scale to measure your weight when you use carbon to date things older than around 40,000 years or so.

[@ronniemolina3254]

I am not too sure about the literal 24-hour day, because of 2 Peter 3:8- "But you must not forget this one thing, dear friends: A day is like a thousand years to the Lord, and a thousand years is like a day."

[@richardgregory3684]

_Flintstones, meet the Flintstones! They're the modern stone age family_ _From the town of Bedrock, They're a page right out of history_ Sadly, some Christians seem to take this quite literally. "Hey kids, there's a documentary about dinosaurs on TV!"

[@derekkane4574]

Pop quiz: which logical fallacy does this post represent? Attack the arguments not the person. We can do better. 👍

[@Lexi2019AURORA]

@@derekkane4574 Answer: none, he's right. 🤣

[@StooFras-TheFiresofHell.]

I had put in a perfectly relevant comment in the early hours of this morning but it has been deleted for some unknown reason,my question was quite simply if Adam and Eve were the first humans on planet earth where do the cavemen and women come into it,I cannot imagine that Adam or Eve were caveman and woman.🤔

[@user-hx3ko7vj4y]

Welcome to telling the truth on youtube.

[@arielmarbury467]

My kids really enjoyed this!!

[@jimklein6958]

Excellent video!!

[@mrcowboymerrill1791]

I would like to see the evidence that dinosaurs were on the ark.

[@alantasman8273]

The evidence is in human art found around the globe...including textiles, petroglyphs, sculptures and more. Look up Peruvian Ica burial stones and Mexican Acambara figurines. Archeologists will deny that they are real but they are often anatomically correct having been discovered over a hundred years ago.

[@timothyirwin8974]

We would like to see scientific evidence of this ark.

[@mickblack3291]

I would like to see evidence of T Rex's not eating all the other animals on the ark

[@alantasman8273]

@@mickblack3291The Bible states that God brought the animals to the Ark two by two ..male and female. Meaning God chose which dinosaurs to be on the Ark. Since Dinosaur soft tissue has now been found at dig sites on five continents complete with blood vessels, blood cells, collagen, erythrocytes and even partial DNA, we know that they lived recently with man. And since we still have the many descendants of the animals from the Ark with us today, we can deduce that dinosaurs on the Ark (probably young dinosaurs) did not eat the other residents in the Ark

[@hifijohn]

I would like to see the evidence that the ark existed.

[@mr.fastforward]

amem , i love it!!!

[@philiprobe755]

Very good. And I would concur with his understanding. I would add, after the ice was removed during the flood, the atmospheric pressure no longer sustained the size animals that were destroyed by the flood. Those smaller land lizards are here today but don't live 1500 years.. The planet no longer supports long life because of God's anger towards man. God cut our lifespan's by 80%.. and naturally the animals lifespan's were reduced as well.

[@joschmo1007]

"Butter their head and push." I'm listening to this with earphones, and juat belly laughed in the middle of my kids' karate class on that one. Oops! At least it's in a church gym and the kids are loud.

[@tomw6271]

Science is observable and repeatable, if not then it isn't science. Christians are more scientific in understanding that people weren't here to observe origins and so origins are always a matter of faith. Also, origins aren't repeatable and so at best theories are just that.

[@staben22]

Well said Tomw6271

[@litigioussociety4249]

​@@klouis1886We have seen the movement of a single atom, or a sheet one atom thick with modern tools. We also were able to determine their existence and properties based on calculations of other observable things. An atom is to our observations as a molecule of water is to a glass of water. The comparison for historical things would be the orientation of an atom even a day ago is essentially unknowable with modern science, and that's more deterministic than prehistory.

[@benztech2262]

⁠@@klouis1886 Can’t atoms be observed under an electron microscope?

[@klouis1886]

@litigioussociety4249 We have observed evolution in process. The bottom linevis that we can determine many things are true without direct observation

[@masada2828]

@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 ‘Fact’ u say, there are no facts in Evolution, still an unproven theory.

[@Just_Space_Dave]

Why should we infer “ordinary 24 hour” as the standard or reference period for what the Bible means as a “day” in this text?? If Earth was created before the Sun and we know we derive our current definition of a day from Earth’s rotation in reference to the Sun and our definition of year is based on the time required to orbit the Sun, why is it assumed that 24 hours would be the standard definition of a day before the Sun even existed??

[@carolebates9235]

Grass, herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind, were created in day 3. Green plants and trees could not survive longer than a day without the sun, which was appointed on the 4th day.

[@blessedwithchallenges9917]

Please. You can try not to understand, or you can try to understand. God said, "Let there be light." Genesis 1:1-3 where does light for the plants came from - you just don't want to understand.

[@gmen22za]

Actually in the bible a day for God is equivalent to 1000 years so this is wrong it is not a period of 24 hours

[@blessedwithchallenges9917]

@@gmen22za probably should say it might be a thousand years, or a day. Nobody really knows - right?

[@gmen22za]

@@blessedwithchallenges9917 sorry lol a thousand years haha

[@marionmarcetic7287]

EVERY KNEE SHALL BOW AND EVERY TONGUE CONFESS THAT JESUS CHRIST IS LORD! SHALOM AND AMEN!✝️✝️🛐🛐📛🕊️🕊️🕊️❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥🤰🤱🧬🤰🤱✨👑✨🦁🦁🦁❣️❣️❣️🌺🌺🌺😇🌟🤗🙏🙏🙏🇨🇦🇮🇱♾️🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🦅🗽‼️

[@earthquakesimulationguyidk]

Shut up 💀

[@Midi-olo-gist6758]

This is truly some good material to make you look think and question science, not God. I'll be checking you all out more. 😊Thanks so much for the video.

[@MatthewSmith-if7vd]

AMEN. Finally, someone who speaks with a knowledgeable premise on the Word of God in the early days after creation. Sensible and logical explanation that doesn't betray biblical faith and understanding. Prayers to you, my brother in Christ 👍🙏✌️

[@christopheespic]

Does it not betray integrity?

[@user-hh3cz1km6h]

@@christopheespic No, it counters the fairy tales of secularist hunger for cash and fame with science.

[@bennyb7067]

I don't blame him for thinking like this, evolution is not properly taught through high school in my opinion so misconceptions are abundant. But just watching the first 3 minutes I have some notes. Individuals don't change, populations do. Species change on a gradient over really big stretches of time, so saying a dinosaur will always produce something that looks like itself is true! But if that offspring has a mutation that gives it any sort of edge, it's more likely to live to reproductive age and spread that mutation, which then becomes prevalent, and it happens again. That's why we can see so many similarities between the different lineages, because they came from the same ancestor. When he describes one ancestor splitting into like 7 lineages, that's an example of allopatric speciation, where populations are geographically secluded from one another and are able to evolve independently.

[@christinejoseph3366]

Can you explain how changes in population leads to entirely new creatures? E.g single cell to something else more complex.

[@bennyb7067]

@christinejoseph3366 yeah I mean when you look at eukaryotes, imagine a series of very small changes over millions of years in response to the needs of the changing environment or needing to match competition, and eventually, that organism doesn't look like it used to and it's genetically dissimilar enough that it can no longer reproduce with what it once was (if that organism is still around). This isn't just speculation either, we do have really good transition fossils that show a gradient of change over time, and we find them in the geographic locations, and at the stratic level we expect to. It's hard to imagine this stuff on human timescales because it takes a reaaaally long time for such pronounced changes to occur, but we can see mechanisms of evolution occurring over human timescales. In regards to single to multi cellular life, there have been studies conducted that expose single cellular (algae I think?) organisms to a certain environmental pressure, and they began forming clusters that reproduced more clusters as opposed to single cells, something that could definitely be the start of single to multi cellular life. You can look at endosymbiosis, too, the theory that mitochondria and chloroplasts were once their own cells that got engulfed by another cell and they formed a symbiosis, which has really good support, seeing that mitochondria and choloroplasts are the only organelles that have their own independent genome, separate from nucleic DNA. Sorry for the wordy response but I wanted to answer your question as thoroughly as possible and I'm very passionate about this stuff

[@TheHeggert]

​@@bennyb7067 I do believe in the mechanisms that allow for a certain amount of change within a kind. But from goo to you? Nope. You still have the very difficult problem of where the goo came from, who designed it, why were conditions right for any life to be sustained. And mutations almost everytime time cause demise. We see it now. You'll have me believe at some point a multicell simple creature happened to evolve a heart like organ and a lung type organ at the same time? And those mutations were somehow beneficial enough the organism survived to pass those on and then got lucky enough to have more beneficial mutations so that we have beautiful organisms with such complexity? Your way of thinking takes way more faith than mine does. And it's no wonder everytime I turn around science is adding more years to this theory.

[@bennyb7067]

@TheHeggert actually most mutations are neutral, then deleterious, then beneficial. There's no "goo" it's not like all this happened at once. The leading hypothesis for abiogenetis is RNA world hypothesis which involves ribozymes being the first macromolecule that could initiate this process, as they can self catalyze, and they're self replicating. (This is something they've confirmed is possible in the lab). As for the organ thing, I think you're getting hung up on the idea of basic allllll the way to super complex life at once. The most basal animals don't have organs (sponge), flatworms don't even have a circulatory system, though they're capable of locomotion. These things arose in very basic simple ways and complexity was added slowly though billions of years. Fish don't have lungs but they do have a heart, then you look at more derived fish like the coelacanth that have partially functional lungs and still a fully functional heart. My point is most that everything didn't happen at once. Some organisms don't need a heart and some don't need to breathe.

[@chriswebertreesurgeon]

Its all a diversion. What the man is teaching is nonsense and has zero to do with Christ's gospel. Its ok to be a Christian and accept basic tenets of evolution. Its also ok to not have to defend evolution. Evolution is a theory in progress, so trying to defend it against guys like this won't prove too successful, it is a working theory so naturally easy to attack it. The point is its all irrelevant. The Bible doesn't say the earth is 6000 years old. Guys like this do. The Bible doesn't. They are preaching divisive doctrines which ultimately drive more people away from Christ than they will ever lead to him. Its ok to believe in God and evolution. The Bible says God created our bodies, it doesn't say HOW He did it.

[@bornr2797]

Great vid

[@rosemerimaarlo3656]

Duration of the creation days may also be a factor

[@vernanderson4358]

Been aware of this now since college days in the 1960s. First membership in ICR back in 1970 approx . Enjoyed debates featuring Dr Gish back then. Saying all this simply because so few Christians and/or churches even cared back then. In about mid seventies did a 7 part instructional series at our church simply to make attendees aware of the need to be staunch 6 day creationists. I was 25 years old and 2 years out of college. What is scary is the fact that so few even paid any attention to the issue in our church and found it almost boring. Wife and self left that church. Today I remain grateful for all the creation research and factual evidence presented by many creationist organizations. Unfortunately apathy still intrenched in the church community. Worse yet many denominations and "professing" christians are embracing the theistic evolution or progressive creationism falsity. Folks pray HARD for conviction and repentance. This hybrid doctrine is simply satanic.

[@c5grapeape]

Thanks for making this video. It sure opened my eyes. I've known we've been lied to about a lot of things we were taught growing up and I've slowly been getting educated again the right way. God Bless....

[@marialindgren4112]

Day 3 and 4 should be inverted, there can not ve any plants without the sun, green plants have to photosyntgesize.

[@ck4309]

I’m a Christian but what I don’t understand is how dinosaurs could be any less than 50,000 years old when there is no carbon 14 left to decay on them, and carbon 14 fully decays after 50,000 years. Can someone explain?

[@Lord.alucarD]

You're not supposed to think about that

[@davidm4566]

That is my question: how can they say that something is millions of years old when there would be no more carbon-14 left to take a sample of way earlier than that. I also heard that C-14 is fully used up after 10,000 years. You said it lasts longer so I'll have to look it up. Some of the dinosaur fossils also still have bone marrow left so that would indicate it being much younger than hypothesized.

[@martinklein4651]

And the serpent spoke to Eve.😂So funny. Explain that one.

[@HangrySaturn]

Magic

[@MichaelWilliams-eq4kt]

The serpent is a cherub.

[@HangrySaturn]

@@MichaelWilliams-eq4kt Source?

[@user-ml1dx9xk7z]

My biggest disagreement is with how long a "day" was to God in his creation. Remember 2 Peter 3:8, "But do not overlook this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day." In other words, TIME HAS NO MEANING TO GOD!

[@rowanmurphy5239]

Excellent presentation, thank you. But concerning recommending AiG for explanations on distant starlight, Barry Setterfield is actually the one with the best explanation. It's not even close. I wish AiG and ICR would give him his dues.

[@tythompson4794]

It’s not about the worldview. They come to different conclusions because of the worldview and the findings are peer reviewed and rigorously tested and they come to a conclusion. If AIG stayed within their bounds of what they actually need to explain instead of making nonsensical, unsupported claims about evolution and dinosaurs, then they’d at least be somewhat respectable.

[@logalas71]

Please tell us how evolution is rigorously tested and peer reviewed. Specifically from the fossil record.