6 Powerful Evidences for the Biblical Flood

Starting from the Biblical description of the Flood, this presentation is an overview of six easily-grasped, convincing, large-scale evidences for the Flood. Visit examples of fossils and rock layers from the Grand Canyon that can be found across the North American continent and beyond.
Dr. Andrew Snelling holds a PhD in geology from the University of Sydney, Australia. He serves as Answers in Genesis’ Director of Research and is the Editor-in-Chief of the Answers Research Journal. answersingenesis.org/bios/and...
LECTURE NOTES - - - - - - - - - -
Fossils: Buried in the Flood, not Evolution over Millions of Years
Dr. Andrew A. Snelling
The rock layers are real and the fossils in them are real. There is an order to the rock layers and to the fossils. But the evolutionists only depict on their diagrams the fossils they claim to show evolution. But what do the fossils teach us?
God’s Word is the only reliable eyewitness account of the earth’s history, beginning with creation, corruption then catastrophe. The fossils show death and disease, so they had to form after the Curse during the Flood catastrophe.
Billions of dead things called fossils buried in rock layers laid down by water all over the earth. And the fossils had to form by virtually instantaneous burial, or otherwise the animals would have rotted or been eaten.
The fossils appear in the rock record fully formed and fully functioning, perfectly designed by their Creator with no supposed evolutionary ancestors. And we don’t find the supposed transitional fossils, the so-called “missing links” are missing, as even evolutionists testify.
Many varieties of fossil creatures are found, but only within their created kinds. And after appearing in the fossil record suddenly, each kind may vary but many varieties stay the same, many being the same today as their fossil representatives supposedly many millions of years old.
What we find is evidence of rapid mass destruction and burial on a global scale in a catastrophe (the Flood) in rock layers laid down by water even right across continents.
The fossil sequence order is therefore the order of burial during the Flood. We see the order in which pre-Flood ecosystems were progressively destroyed by the rising Flood waters and then buried in that order. And most of the fossil record is made of shallow water marine invertebrates such as clams and corals, buried all the way up through the rock record.
Even fossil burrows, footprints and eggs can be explained by the oscillating tidal levels of the flood waters. In fact, many footprints are found in the rock record supposedly millions of years before the animals that made them!
Then after the Flood animals migrated from the Ark landing site by traveling across land bridges during the post-Flood Ice Age when the sea level dropped by hundreds of metres, and/or were carried on floating vegetation mats left over from the Flood and especially due to post-flood local catastrophic floods.
So we can full explain the fossils and their order in the rock record based on God’s Word.
- - - - - - - - - -
Watch Answers.tv
Answers in Genesis videos, live streams, and more-all in one place.
Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world: AnswersinGenesis.org/give
Zion photo by Jamie Hagan on Unsplash
unsplash.com/photos/RWzPBcWVdpw

[@michelegioffredo8811]

I always had trouble logically linking the theories taught to me in school.... now I know why.

[@paulgarduno2867]

@All About Britain creation is a historical fact. Evolution as preached by Darwin, has never happened.

[@lillockey04]

@All About Britain Didn't watch the video, huh.

[@jacobostapowicz8188]

@All About BritainEvolution ignores entropy. 'Self organizing systems with increasing complexity' is a fairy tale that doesn't exist in natural processes.

[@cloroxlavenderscent4307]

The theory of evolution is one theory with the most amount of evidence in science. It's proven through the fossil record time and time again. But yeah believe what you want to believe. We have transitional fossils for nearly every animal.

[@jacobostapowicz8188]

@@norbertjendruschj9121In an open system Entropy is only accelerated, for example the sun increases entropy on earth. Entropy cannot be decreased or have gradients, naturalists tend to conflate it with energy but its a description of how systems naturally evolve.

[@Thisisnotmyrealname8]

Imagine Noah watching the animals as they approach the ark and there's all kinds he's never seen before. That must have been pretty cool. Feels like we've seen everything now, and all I really want to see are these events in the past.

[@mrmaestrouk]

The Arc is not what You think. Nor is Noah

[@Psychiatrick]

Though as large as the Arc was supposed to be, I highly doubt it was big enough to hold 2 of every creature. However, since the flood was local, in the Tarim Basin, S/W China, there wouldn't have been that many aminals. I believe the world's largest aquifer is located under the Tarim Basement.

[@Thisisnotmyrealname8]

​@@Psychiatrick oh, you're one of "them." Thanks for sharing your opinion.

[@Eman-vp5wk]

@@mrmaestrouk yes it is and yes he is

[@theconstitutionalist5617]

@@Psychiatrick Every creature? Where does the Bible say that? It’s says “kind” not creature which is equaled to species We believe “kind” is equaled to the family on taxonomic scale which only puts it in the thousands of animals not millions.

[@larryblevins8078]

Thank God it's about time that someone starts telling the truth.

[@nobody4y]

To me it looks like someone doesn't understand science or Noah failed to save 99% of all species of life that existed

[@yvonneplant9434]

Not from this guy. There have been 5 distinct mass extinction periods. And only one flood to you all. Was there more than one flood? But, yippee now you all are cool with fossils.

[@Psychiatrick]

Truth? What is truth?~POTUS Pilot

[@alantasman8273]

@@Psychiatrick That would be Pontius Pilot

[@Psychiatrick]

@@alantasman8273 "POTUS" ... where's your patriotism?

[@busker153]

Something I have never heard addressed is that the Bible, and our observation, indicate a difference in the kinds of flesh of birds, beasts, and man. So, not only does a fish need to transition from fins to legs, the flaky flesh needs to change into land animal flesh. Hmmm...

[@robertlovato2257]

Now u know it not possible !.. and no animal has evolved to an other spices but to adaptation to environment a kind of animals it's kind it's likeness many breeds of dogs and cats but still dogs and cats many breeds of birds but still birds ???..

[@busker153]

@@robertlovato2257 Maybe I was unclear. Macro-evolution is a lie from the pits of hell, to be sure. I was offering an angle that I have never heard addressed because the different kinds of flesh makes their dumb religion even harder to support. So, you and I are on the same page. I reread my original posting, and yes, it was a bit vague, so, thank you for the chance to clarify. It is not just a matter of changing shapes, but the kinds of flesh would have had to change, making the already absurd even more absurd. Nice to meet ya!

[@busker153]

@Darwins Myth I am with you all the way! That DNA would need to have new coding introduced (from where? Like, nowhere!), and reproduction never does that. DNA material is lost, but never added. I love all the angles that prove a young earth. And, there are so many in a lot of disciplines. I could type all day. I'm sorry if my original posting was not clear. I know macro-evolution is just a religion, and a stupid one to boot.

[@beestoe993]

Right, because marine creatures are at the bottom of the pile. I had to consider what you said for a moment. These smart men opened up MY eyes. All the crap Ive believed for decades was all a load of rubbish. The flood was real.

[@bswihart1]

I love the mathematical improbability that a single cell was created out of a nothing soup of crazy

[@meismonke5543]

I love the mathematical improbability that so many “miracles” have happened.

[@bradleygrice2189]

@@meismonke5543 All things with God are possible for HE alone made everything and He gave us HIS HOLY WORD :) TO TRAD AND STUDY THAT TELLS US THE TIME LINE OF WHEN AND WHERE HE MADE US

[@jacobostapowicz8188]

@@meismonke5543 According to quantum probability distributions, miracles are possible.

[@paulgarduno2867]

@@jacobostapowicz8188 yes but first , give a definition of the nature of "Quantum" . Quantum Field..? Quantum Fluctuations..? Quantum Tunneling..? Quantum Entanglement..? Who wrote the... Quantum laws of Phisycs ..? .. ..in order for the miracle to become reality.??

[@meismonke5543]

@@jacobostapowicz8188 so is abiogenesis

[@DPhasely]

I always wondered as a child why i would find sea shells hiking in the desert and on top of Papago park here in Arizona.

[@chrisanderson5317]

I love this guy's passion. It is heart AND head. The evidence he suggests is there was a worldwide flood

[@chrisanderson5317]

@Joe dirty71 there is evidence of a universal flood on every continent.

[@bobvadney7240]

There never was...a what...??? you mean a " WHAT.." never happened..???... What the..." H..." is a...What..??? take ya time....maybe its stenciled on ya underwear...👺

[@truthgiver8286]

It is heart and no head. Once you won't accept logic there is no head in the game it's just heart

[@iamshredder3587]

Rather, the Bible PROVES there was a global flood and the rest of this evidence just confirms it.

[@truthgiver8286]

@@iamshredder3587 The bible is proof of nothing it gets so many things wrong it is an untrustworthy source. If there was a global flood where di all the water go?

[@dakotawallace9826]

The ark replica they built is 437ft long. According to Ron Wyatts find in Turkey, the ark is 515ft, exactly 300 royal cubits.

[@thomasmurrell6908]

It is not a replica of anything, it's a building shaped like a boat, concrete and steel, electricity and aircon, modern building materials.

[@beestoe993]

There is no real proof that the formation in Turkey is the remnants of the ark. There has never been any solid evidence found to support the claim. So it is just a theory that it left that mark in the earth. I think it cold be a remnant of the ark. But it could just as easily be a natural formation. No wood or anything like that has been found to substantiate the claim. I think Ron Wyatt was pretty smart, but the chariot wheel in the red sea thing was too much for me to swallow. I don't believe it.

[@berylackermann8240]

Thankful that people are starting to believe the facts that EARTH is a young planet not billions of years or Evolved over time. Man, animals, creatures have the ability to adapt to their environment. Ken Wise discovered when visiting Mt. Helena's eruption just after it happened and found fossilization happened in seconds.

[@berylackermann8240]

Sorry the gentleman's name was Kurt Wise not Ken Wise.

[@burntgod7165]

You're both wrong (surprise, surprise). Creationist Steve Austin made the Mount Helena stuff up. It's been debunked by a multitude of geologists.

[@stevepierce6467]

"Facts" require concrete evidence. There are plenty of facts backed by evidence that describe a world 4.5 billion years old. Not a single shred of evidence anywhere points to a young biblical-aged earth. Ken Wise may have found animals and plants encased in mud and ash in just seconds, but fossilization is a very long process.

[@ianmonk6211]

​@@burntgod7165lol denying evidence you can see shows the height of deception evolutionists are in. It's all on video. With before and after pictures.

[@lauracaskey2753]

Love your channel! God bless your ministry! The world needs to hear the truth of God

[@lauracaskey2753]

@@stephenlaing2152 You are wrong... My God, the only ,God, the God of the Bible is the ONLY God ......Every knee shall bow , every tongue confess JESUS CHRIST IS LORD!

[@lauracaskey2753]

@@stephenlaing2152 the sect that believes Jesus Christ is Lord, that He is the Son of God, that He died for our sins and rose again on the third day. If we repent and confess Him as Lord we will be saved. The Bible is the true authoritative word of God, and Jesus Christ is the only way to God.

[@lauracaskey2753]

@@stephenlaing2152 Sir, I answered you so don't think that anything you can say... derogative or otherwise would change my mind about what I believe. Happy New Year

[@nathanmikangi9756]

great presentation sir, though i am an atheist this has solved my problem: Assignment from history and philosophy of biology which demanded evidences of global flood....thaaaaanks

[@truthisbeautiful7492]

You should read Noah's Ark: How it Worked. Great book from Amazon.

[@yvonneplant9434]

This guy says nothing about the multiple mass extinction events. To him there was only one mass extinction caused by the flood. He doesn't know a thing about star evolution/fusion ... It's simply "God made the Sun..." and he's done! Lol And he certainly doesn't know anything about this famous equation, E=mc2.

[@yvonneplant9434]

​@@truthisbeautiful7492 It didn't work. Please be smarter than the presenter.

[@truthisbeautiful7492]

@@yvonneplant9434 did you read the book?

[@phatysoun]

Where could I get those document slices Sire? I do want to step in and learn bout the 7's main events. Really appreciate that in advance!

[@jelitone1197]

"How can a true bird be around to have evolved from dinosaurs if it live at the same time as dinosaurs?" Lol.

[@Tasia71144]

I remember asking my teacher in the 2nd grade where the dinosaurs on Noahs Ark were; she told me that they died millions of years ago. I remember thinking that is not true and also I was in Catholic school and my teacher was a NUN!!

[@garyharrison555]

NUNS sadistic mean people, yes five years in a Catholic school The priest's seventy five now can't forget

[@CornerstoneMinistry316]

This is why catholics aren't real Christians. Dinosaurs couldn't have died millions of years.....the earth is roughly 6k years old. The dinosaurs were on the ark.

[@burntgod7165]

The nun was right; you were a kid who knew nothing at that time. You seem to know little of geology now, too. There are tree ring records that go back more than 10,000 years, with no evidence of a catastrophic world-wide flood during that time.

[@wtghost1]

wheres your evidence?@@burntgod7165

[@diamondlife-gi7hg]

old earth creationism aligns more with science so an extinct t rex and other dead dinosaurs makes more room on the ark.

[@georgemay8170]

I believe the first question to ask is, "How accurate is the measurement of Carbon Dating?"

[@Eman-vp5wk]

It’s not about how accurate it really is, it’s about how accurate they SAY it is. You see, people who rely on secular science, but don’t actually do the science, put in their faith into someone else’s word.

[@davidm4566]

The answer is: not very. The older the specimen the less reliable it becomes. Human brand objects (like Zippo lighters encased in coal) sometimes read as tens of thousands of years old with radiocarbon dating. The problem with carbon dating is that it assumes all living things had the same amount of carbon-14 in them when they died. It also assumes that all things decay at the same rate in all situations. Logically it makes no sense that a fossil on top of a mountain would decay at the same rate as one at the bottom of a mine shaft or at the bottom of the ocean.

[@klouis1886]

Very accurate

[@SokemRokemRobot]

Finding carbon-14 in items are more telling than carbon dating. If there is even a trace of carbon-14 found in something, then it cannot be over 50k years old, maximum, because the half-life of carbon-14 is 3900 years. With that said, diamonds, dinosaur bones, oil, fossils, coal, etc., have all been tested with carbon in them, so they can't possibly be older than 50k years old.

[@robertlovato2257]

Not accurate at all !!.. hypothetical a maybe ? Possible guess ?.. bunch of made up data more then not !...

[@thinkcivil1627]

Very well done. Thank you!

[@blobrios8605]

✝️Repent from your sins🙏, turn to God before it’s to late⏰, for tomorrow is not promised ❤️

[@Hope-kx9lz]

An explanation for the animals living in Australia could also be because the continents split during the flood. Strong earthquakes and massive volcanic eruptions caused the continental plates to move apart.

[@christophercoupe5006]

They would have drowned either way! These animals got there after the flood most likely by ice bridges or floating trees, debris...

[@Hope-kx9lz]

@@taylorthetunafish5737 Just open your mind and start to think for yourself, don't parrot everything the education system want you to believe.

[@christophercoupe5006]

@@taylorthetunafish5737 You make a good point about there not being enough water on the planet to cover all the high mountains today. The world's present mountains were formed after the flood by fast plate tectonics! As pangea was torn apart by plates moving much faster than today they collided with one another creating mountains. This happened where plates bumped into each other. We know this in part because layers making up the mountains are folded like soft clay. So yes before the present mountains existed there was enough water to flood the entire planet!

[@alantasman8273]

@@taylorthetunafish5737 Do some reading on Walt Brown's Hydroplate theory.

[@yvonneplant9434]

The same process is going on right now wrt plate techtonics.

[@nbenefiel]

There are stories about massive floods all over the ancient world. At the end of the last ice age the great herds were declining, hunting was difficult. Paleolithic people tended to live in small groups close to the oceans and along rivers. When the ice age ended, the glaciers melted raising the height of the oceans between 300 and 400 feet relatively quickly causing massive flooding. The Sumerian tablet with the epic story of Gilgamesh is the earliest text we have. The Hebrew account of Noah is much later. There are accounts in China of a great flood destroying the world. The Greek story of Atlantis has it destroyed by a massive flood.

[@seankennedy4284]

The question I ask is, what are the data which require explanation, and which hypothesis, most reasonably and thoroughly, accounts for that data. The Noah's Flood hypothesis sure appears to explain much of the critical data quite well. To wit, the contents of this vid. Sure, your hypothesis MIGHT accurately explain the data, but you have yet to demonstrate such---nor in addition have you confuted the TIGHT fit of the data, vis-a'-vis the Noah's Flood hypothesis, as discussed in this vid. Yours remains a steep climb.

[@nuke_man_ai]

Was gonna comment exactly this!

[@curious968]

@@seankennedy4284 No, it doesn't. It makes particular predictions that are not borne out by the data. If there was a single global flood (as opposed to local ones that became local legends), then they would be at least roughly synchronized in time. Moreover (I'm being deliberately generous with dates here) the Biblical flood would have happened between 3000 BC and 2000 BC. If it worked as Genesis said, every culture on earth would have had a big break in continuity. The previous culture would have ceased unexpectedly without any warning they documented. That culture would vanish, never to reappear. Then, some decades or centuries later, a completely different people with a different religion and culture would appear and appear with new writing systems, too. But China, India, and Egypt have no such period and certainly none that can be synchronized over the required timeframe.

[@beestoe993]

Wrong. There was only one flood and one ice age.

[@curious968]

@@beestoe993 And what's your proof? Some ideas working some of the time won't prove a global flood. Especially if you can't prove they happened at the same time. I've never seen any serious attempt to prove that -- it is often just assumed. But we know floods, big ones, happen a lot. Geologists know of some bigger ones we haven't seen in historical times. But, even those are not universal. We know how much ground they covered. Not nearly enough. So, many cultures recording a flood doesn't prove nearly enough multiple ways. Meanwhile, where's the universal break in human culture? On what date (within a century will do) did all existing writing systems get abandoned and slowly replaced with something else? And the new script would be semitic. Everywhere. When did all existing religions (including in the Americas) get replaced with something at least roughly comparable to the Israelite religion, or a recognizable precursor? Lacking proof of these (never mind geology and other topics) means you hold an empty sack. Because a universal flood _predicts_ such events and they did not happen.

[@SokemRokemRobot]

I don't have the proof, but I believe, Trilobites probably still exist somewhere in the oceans. Evolutionists thought, the Coelacanths were extinct until one was caught by a fisherman in 1938. After my comments, I noticed, some of this info is in this video.

[@prisonguy9637]

​@stephen Laing nothing could have existed millions of years ago if the earth isn't even one million years old is the point this videos making🤦

[@SokemRokemRobot]

@@stephenlaing2152 Evolutionists believe, the Dawn of Man began between 3-4 million yrs ago. Do you actually think, the 8 billion world population we have today, fits with that evolutionary timeline? There would be trillions of people on Earth today, if that evolutionary timeline really happened.

[@curious968]

There are no trilobites today just as there are no bear-like dogs (if you go back far enough, bears and dogs had a common ancestor -- several such speicies, in fact). There are also no surviving four legged whales and much else. The coelacanth is fun, but even that is not exactly the same creature as the one from ancient times. It evolved; just more slowly. It certainly was an unexpected find and should put us on our guard about ancient animals. That said, most extinct creatures don't exist today and aren't going to be unexpectedly found. There were once very large dragonflies. We'd know if they were still around.

[@Blazeww]

I've also met God and it was not how I woulda imagined it going given how forsaken I felt before that and like He just hated me. He even hid his face so I wouldn't just die and have been stuck in Sheol (place the dead wait to face judgment). Will say that even just bring near him as I wasn't good enough to see his face. It was like I was never abused as a kid and had never lived on Earth a day in my life. The Love, Patience, Wholeness and Peace He radiates just made it all as if it was never real.

[@Blazeww]

Tho me freaking out as a portal pulled me in hurt more than any pain on earth. Like being sucked through a straw or singularity as the body doesn't dull or fog the mind as in life but makes it more and more clear the worse the pain gets. God's advice. "Stop Struggling, Let go." Took everything I had to listen. Once I did tho. The hole opened and the pain vanished as I fell into a hospital room looking down from above my lifeless body as nurses stood around helplessly. Not the room I remembered as I blacked out miles away. Knew exactly where was tho. Went in through the top of my head and startled the nurses who rushed off to get the doctor. Despite the pain worse than even necrotized intestine and Fungus growing inside me on a different occasion that had me in a wheel chair from pain. If I had to I'd go through that otherworldly pain again just to even exist in God's presence and just stand there doing nothing but give praise. That's just how amazing it really is.

[@raultejeda5506]

great point. thorns and thistles were after the fall. it's like historical Sedoku.

[@Casn521]

Wow what a just god making people suffer for something someone else did

[@EdgarKhayat]

I have one question: before the creation of the sun on the fourth day, what was keeping the Earth in space and when did it start orbiting the sun?

[@adelinomorte7421]

***they are unable to answer questions of this kind, they only want to sell what they believe***

[@burntgod7165]

They can't answer these questions. That's when they start interpreting their apparent literal Genesis

[@stevepierce6467]

The earth does not orbit the sun, the sun and all the stars and galaxies in the universe orbit our earth, the only stationary point in the whole universe, and it is a flat piece of wood supported by four columns supported by a giant turtle.........supported by another giant turtle.......and it's turtles all the way down! In other words, the bible story is a childish folkloric fantasy.

[@diamondlife-gi7hg]

God kept it because he's God and nothing is impossible for him. People sometimes leave God out of the equation.

[@allysondoerfler8688]

People have been breeding cattle, sheep, horses, dogs, birds from the beginning. "I wonder if one of my cows gave birth to a giraff," said no rancher, ever.

[@davidgardner863]

No one ever said a cow gave birth to a giraffe.

[@ThyNam3less]

@@davidgardner863 scientist say we came from rocks lol

[@davidgardner863]

@@ThyNam3less , No scientist ever said that but creationists say we came from a pile of dust. Isn’t that just pulverized rock?

[@davidm4566]

@@davidgardner863 we are mostly made of carbon...just like dust

[@davidgardner863]

@@davidm4566 , Carbon based but mostly water.

[@donnabrown7767]

Great video 🙏

[@walkergarya]

1. The most common date given for the flood is 4400 years ago, right in the middle of the Egyptians first burst of city and temple building, why did they not notice they were under water? 2. To flood the planet to over top the highest mountain you would need about 3 to 4 times the known amount of water in the world, where did all that water come from? 3. After the flood, where did the water go? 4. How did 8 people build a wooden ship bigger than any wooden ship built in modern times when THAT ship was reinforced with steel bracing and still broke up and sank. 5. How did animals with odd diets get to the ark? 6. How did 8 people deal with the needs of 10000 animals on the ark? Each animal had to be fed, watered, exercised and the poop scooped. Working 12 hours a day they would need to deal with over 100 animals per hour. 7. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood. 8. If there were 10000 animals on the ark representing about 4000 species, and there is now about 8.7 million species on Earth, each species surviving the flood would have to generate 217 new species in the 4400 years since the flood. 9. Well according to the Book of Jasher, the wives ARE sisters. Jasher 5: 32-35 "And thou shalt choose for thy sons three maidens, from the daughters of men, and they shall be wives to thy sons. And Noah rose up, and he made the ark, in the place where God had commanded him, and Noah did as God had ordered him. In his five hundred and ninety-fifth year Noah commenced to make the ark, and he made the ark in five years, as the Lord had commanded. Then Noah took the three daughters of Eliakim, son of Methuselah, for wives for his sons, as the Lord had commanded Noah." If a species undergoes a population bottleneck, the lack of genetic diversity can be seen in the members of that species. NO such bottle neck exists in the overwhelming majority of species. 10. 4400 years is not a long enough time to generate the diversity in the human population to give rise to the different populations of people we see on the planet especially when you consider that effectively the genetic diversity was limited to 4 people, Noah and his wife and Eliakim and his wife. 11. Ken Ham's phony Ark has a million Dollar + heating, ventilation and air conditioning system that ensures that workers and visitors do not suffocate in the building. According to the bible, the original Ark had one window, 18 in square. Sorry people but if Ham's estimate of 1600 species represented by a minimum of 4000 animals, they would have suffocated. 12. There is NO trace of any global flood in the geology of the world. Lots of local and regional floods, yes, but NO global flood. 13. Oh and by the way, for those fools at CMI who think Noah's Flood was a real event, a Tomb has been discovered in Egypt dated to 4400 years ago, about the time of the mythical flood (according to many biblical creationists). This raises several questions. a. If the Tomb was built before the flood, how did it escape being flooded? b. If the Tomb was built after the flood, the Earth's population would have been devistated so who built the tomb? c. Why is this Tomb perfectly in line with Egyptian culture before and after the fairy tale flood? If everybody in Egypt were killed in the flood, the Egyptian culture from before the flood would have been lost. Untouched 4,400-year-old tomb discovered at Saqqara, Egypt National Geographic, PUBLISHED DECEMBER 17, 2018

[@adelinomorte7421]

***sorry they do not wont to consider all this, they heard a large trumpet and blindly they follow it and build they castle, they are just defending a castle no matter what. I am also spending more time with them then they deserve do defend my castle, but my castle as well as yours is funded on solid rock instead on sand like those who do not reason.***

[@luvontamehlo5750]

You're missing the point of the presentation, while I will not answer all of your points I will make a few observations. Firstly the presentation is questioning the very dating methods used to place events in history. You are using your framework (which they are questioning) to raise your questions. Funny how you call us fools when you should know Radio Carbon Dating can vary up to a 1000 years(Even though the claim is that the tomb of Hekashepes, was untouched). Again I repeat we have issues with dating. As Creationist we have always had issues with how modern "Science" dates and there have been many inconsistencies in this regard. Secondly you assume that people before the flood were of the same strength and ability as modern humans, which may not be true given the fact that they lived 100's of years more than modern man, also it took them almost 120 years to finish this project. Please note still on my second point just because the bible does not mention that they had help does not mean that they were not helped to build the arc. Thirdly you cannot just say there is no trace of a global flood when the very presentation is to partly show this fact. Also the Ark was no luxury cruise some of the questions you raise with regards to how they took care of the animals are insignificant, there may have been multiple systems that were employed to deal with this and lets not forget that we do not argue that this whole process was purely natural and God was not involved. Lastly I have observed that the is data and your conclusion will be based on which frame work you use to interpret the data. Assumptions are made based on which underlying philosophy one chooses.

[@burntgod7165]

@@luvontamehlo5750No, you won't answer his points because you can't. That you dismiss points such as animal husbandry shows you have no interest in inquiry; this is not "insignificant," it is vital. Resorting to "god sorted it" is utterly juvenile. He is not using his "own framework", he is using established facts based on evidence. Virtually every scientist in the world follows the evidence and reaches the same conclusion-and they are of many faiths, and none. The numbers that accept your premise are statistically 0%-and all are driven by religion. There are many dating methods, and creationists either don't understand or deliberately misinterpret carbon dating. There are tree rings dating back 10,000 years that show absolutely no evidence of a catastrophic event of the magnitude of a worldwide flood. Whereas scientists seek evidence, you start with the conclusion and make assumptions to fit in with your story. Not how it's done.

[@EternalVisionToday]

@@luvontamehlo5750, A good response.

[@johnhankins2421]

Thank goodness Noah was able to get polar bears and penguins together to play.

[@normahopkin3393]

Isn't it wonderful that God, 'knowing the beginning from the end', has left us with a logical, true history of Time, backed up with REAL evidence, which we can see and discover for ourselves, since He was well aware of our coming need for this as the great deception, by Satan increasingly overtakes the human mind and thinking as we approach the Return of Jesus. The 'father of lies and deception, has always been able to twist truth, provide constant temptation and defile human hearts and minds, turning them from God's True Word to follow instead his own example of arrogance, selfish self interest, degradation, depravity, deception, self centered delusion and all the pathways that make our world and our lives turned away from God's word and plans for our redemption. I never understood Sodom and Gommorah until recently! My stumbling block was always 'the little ones; the children'! But now in this day and age, I do understand, not only that destruction, but the dual need for the flood. God has not left us without aid and His Word and HIS ENDURING PROOFS are our shield against Satan's deceptions! These are especially needed right now in this present time, where HIS WORD is so relentlessly challenged that even great thinkers, educator and leaders etc., are blinded and so much filled with their own misdirected thinking and arrogant needs to destroy God's word totally, that they've thrown out so many God given gifts. Gifts that Jesus evidenced, while He was in this world. Truth, humility, love of God and our fellow man, rationality, kindness, understanding and so many more. The ruler of this world can really be seen to be here in action, as selfishness and self interest increases! Truth has become a casualty as loss of integrity and the increasing attacks on the words of God are giving greater opportunities for greed, avarice, misdirected pride, depravity and cruelty, etc., to become 'the truth' in this time, where so little makes sense anymore. Thank you for all that you bring to aid us and inform us. God has not left us defenceless, it's so uplifting to know that God is still providing us with Prophets, Wise men and leaders, fit for our time.

[@Blazeww]

They always say oh it wasn't the whole Earth but parts flooded... So how do they also think that Noah's Ark ended up far up a mountainside that would mean that the whole Earth had to have been flooded for the water to be deep enough. And it wasn't millions of years ago so mountain forming plate tectonics doesn't explain why it's so high up now either. Unless they missed a point in history where a non volcanic mountain just shot into the sky and no one noticed at all.

[@acfkelly6291]

Several existing societies didn't notice the flood

[@alantasman8273]

@@acfkelly6291 Yup, they died in it. Funny how there are literally hundreds of different flood accounts globally. It happened and was remembered by Noah's posterity that traveled the globe.

[@wtghost1]

name them please @@acfkelly6291

[@ethanmoon3925]

They say Christians need to retake the rainbow, but you can't do that without acknowledging a literal Flood. Thank you for putting in the work!

[@ThedayoftheLord]

Yes I have also heard that: retake the rainbow. However we should not be surprised the devil is counterfeiting God covenant with men and distorting it. God made 7 colors in the rainbow and the pride people use 6 colors. In their false flag. So let them keep theirs, it’s worth nothing to me. It’s a false flag being used 🤪

[@cherylbradley8797]

If only you were just as passionate for searching which day is the correct Sabbath

[@alantasman8273]

God's Sabbath is a day of rest. 6 days will thow work and on the seventh day thow will rest.

[@SwatiBornGirl]

Thankyou for your lecture, i wonder what fossils can be found where I'm at in Africa

[@Jewonastick]

Many.... Fossils from all sorts of time periods up to several millions of years old.

[@paulgarduno2867]

@11aaf even soft tissue & blood has been found in dinosaurs fossils. Obviously they are only a few thousand of years old.

[@stephenrioux6821]

@11aaf Correct the devotees of ancient myths, and endless genealogies, for they can only bring strife. 1st Timothy 1:4-5

[@stevepierce6467]

@11aaf What about the 4500 year old fossil I found?

[@albusdumbledore219]

Excellent. Thank you. 🙏🏻❤️

[@sophiaherschel567]

and false as eff.

[@nivek2157]

Psalm 104:30 states that the lord actually renewed the face of the earth and instead of saying the earth was without form, it is actually translated from Hebrew to "HAD became without form. The same verb used in Genesis 19:26 states the Lots wife BECAME a pillar of salt. This is actually great news because it allows for an ancient yet purely God-created world whilst totally agreeing with the actual geological and archeological record.

[@alantasman8273]

Sorry, but death did not proceed the original sin of Adam and Eve in the Garden. The Bible says that nature groaned. The wages of sin was death....there was no death before. God in Genesis said what he did each day was good. Disease and Death are not good and were the result of sin ...they did not predate original sin.

[@nivek2157]

@@alantasman8273 the original sin was Satan himself when vanity was found in him and wanted and to become equal to and or greater than God.

[@alantasman8273]

@@nivek2157 No, the Bible is clear that original sin came through one man Adam and that Jesus was the atonement for that sin.

[@nivek2157]

@@alantasman8273 regardless of all that,I thank God the he exists.

[@alantasman8273]

@@nivek2157 Galatians 1:8-9 King James Version 8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. 9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. We must be very careful in the gospel we share with others. If it is not in the Bible..we should not say it.

[@kilroywashere513]

This is the third video I’ve watched about, yet it is not boring💁🏻‍♂.

[@inthelightofhisglory9614]

What an amazing thing when we all get to heaven and see God face to face! I wonder since God sits outside of time, if we can see some of the things that God did throughout creation when we get there?

[@iamshredder3587]

Unlikely. Weren't not omnipresent.

[@inthelightofhisglory9614]

@@iamshredder3587 No but maybe he can show us. That's all I'm saying.

[@iamshredder3587]

@@inthelightofhisglory9614yeah it'd be cool if He does. Always thought it'd be nice to see some of the big moments of history that we didn't get to see.

[@barunto1]

This is an excellent presentation!

[@yvonneplant9434]

It's nonsense. I wish more of you understood that.

[@hogansheroes2793]

Jesus is Lord God Almighty clothed in unsinful humanity and He is the author of eternal life to all who trust Him "alone" for salvation. This actually means that saving repentance is realizing that you are a sinner deserving of God's just punishment in Hell and turn (repent) from whatever you trusted in before, if indeed you trusted in anything; to trusting in the person and finished work of Christ alone for salvation.

[@johngregory5424]

Dear Sir, There is a factor missing from these discussions. Water has weight. 1 square mile of floodwater 1,000 feet in depth weighs 77 million tons. The flood covered the tops of the highest mountains by 15 cubits, so there would be areas of the world with many thousands of feet of floodwater sitting upon them. When that weight of floodwater starts to move it would totally destroy the surface below it. The soil would be removed down to bare rock, all the animals habitats gone. I say again, 1 square mile of floodwater 1,000 feet in depth weighs 77 million tons.

[@l-vbordercolliesbryanbaque6237]

I have seen it brother

[@cloroxlavenderscent4307]

Because you are asking logical questions beyond the scope and understanding of apologists. Because your using your head for more than a hat holder you understand that a flood of that magnitude would cause mass devastation.

[@johngregory5424]

@@l-vbordercolliesbryanbaque6237 Thank you for your responce. For comparison, the devastation of the Pakistan flood was caused by a 4 ft flood, 308 tons per sq. mile

[@johngregory5424]

@@cloroxlavenderscent4307 I used the value 6.19 lbs per cubic ft. As an exercise, find the extra weight caused by those 15 cubits, (App. 18")

[@noneyabidness9644]

First, our mountains are growing every year. Second, where is this sediment being washed away to? Third, the fountains of the deep burst open, which means the waters rose, not just fell. Finally, sediment isn't destroyed, or crushed by water weight.

[@johnthevulcano9266]

Some leafs fossiles are so fresh they have colours before they fade a few seconds after they are exposed to air

[@kirkkirkland7244]

They found 13 biological markers in dinosaur bones like blood cells, soft tissue and DNA that proves they didn't live millions of years ago but only thousands of years ago! Dinosaurs lived with man and there's lots of evidence that shows it like the Inca stones! They were wiped out in the flood!

[@Ann-gn9ns]

The utube was completely out of sync. The voice and visual material were not together making it impossible to follow sadly

[@kirkkirkland7244]

Must be your computer or whatever your watching it on because it's fine on my phone!

[@paulangeloff400]

You’d think your god could synch it up with ease.

[@imkongwapangimchen4513]

This is it! God's word is true.

[@sophiaherschel567]

There are most probably no gods whatsoever

[@adelinomorte7421]

***IN WHAT LANGUAGE DID GOD TOLD YOU ABOUT ALL THAT YOU ARE TELLING "THIS IS IT! GOD´S WORD IS TRUE" in what language??? ***

[@imkongwapangimchen4513]

Languages that are spoken in this world are created by God himself.Therefore, he can speak in any language which can be understood by his people. Sometimes, he can also speak through signs and other means. Don't think that God is limited to one tongue.

[@CJFCarlsson]

You should not rule out abstract thinking and symbolism as beyond the ancients.

[@alantasman8273]

The Bible is God breathed into the writers of the Books which are remarkably consistent over thousands of year....to the point that the foretell the future. So since God is the inspirational author of the Old and New Testaments...what he said is self evident.

[@billjohnson9472]

the fact that we have diverse plants disproves the whole flood idea. a year underwater will kill nearly all types of plant.

[@diamondlife-gi7hg]

sorry but that doesn't disprove the flood because of mass devastation of forrests and plant and sediments there would've been floating debris everywhere on top of this debris could've been plants and trees and seeds even in all this mess they might even have trees and plants growing on the mats. there's answers but some don't want answers to these questions you want errors.

[@billjohnson9472]

@@diamondlife-gi7hg yeah, that doesn't make any sense. Seeds do not survive in that environment. it is not like one cannot test the survival of seeds in wet environments. across the grasslands for example, there are no trees to form these mats. total fantasy because many plants only live in very specific environments and do not propogate with seeds. total fantasy stuff to try to justify the story. there is no evidence at all of such a gigantic die off of plants. and even so - what would all these animals and Noah be eating for months after disembarking this ark? even were they to have seeds it takes months to grow food.

[@Johnny-pp7dx]

I don't want to be in the same room when our maker hears their findings about our planet.

[@PortmanRd]

Understand the rock layers, or twist them to suit their turn of events, by just ignoring anything that doesn't fit in with their ideological way of thinking. Our History, Geography, Science, Biology, etc would be resigned to the the proverbial bin, and the world would follow only one book as their source of reference.

[@ApostleRon]

Gen 1:17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, Gen 1:18 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good. Gen 1:19 And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.

[@truthgiver8286]

yes he created the earth and it was the centre of the universe he created the sun and the stars and they revolved around us hmmmm I think that's been proven without doubt not to be true oh yes and the bible thought the earth was flat and stood on four pillars.

[@EternalVisionToday]

@@truthgiver8286, Any comment on the video itself? Are you able to address any of the arguments presented?

[@dezertfox3681]

@@truthgiver8286 Incorrect. There is nowhere in the Bible that the earth is flat, nor where there four pillars holding it up. All ancient civilizations knew the earth was spherical and had the galaxy charted. Flat earth is more recent in human history. Ende.

[@truthgiver8286]

@@dezertfox3681 Matthew 4:8 The Devil took him to a high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the earth (impossible if it is globe) Psalms 75:3 When the earth and all it's people quake, it is I who holds its pillars firm (these are the pillars other verses refer to as the foundations of the earth) Revelation 7:1 After this I saw four angels standing at the four corners of the earth (globes do not have corners) You really should know what your talking about before telling people they are incorrect but then again why should you it's mythology so who can take it seriously.

[@truthgiver8286]

@@EternalVisionToday Yes it is designed to make money and lots of it from weak willed people. Excuse the pun but the arguments don't hold water there are so many errors in the bible that I do not take any of it serious and dismiss it as mythology.

[@rvvanlife]

Thank you

[@user-sy9hh7x9fi]

Thanks!

[@marydonals1831]

Awesome!

[@mikecolley-]

I would like to find a biblical reference for when he says "for man's sake" at 18:33 - It makes sense, I just don't have a biblical reference.

[@shadowm2k7]

I imagine Noah looking down at all of us from heaven getting mad that the most crazy thing in human history that ever happened most people think never happened 😅

[@pedromarrero]

Thank you for this! About time that someone explained the truth. Jesus cuote: Genesis, Adam and Eve,Jonas and so on . If Jesus said it , that's enough for me. Good job exposing all the inconsistencies of science. God is blessing you guys and He will keep blessing your work.

[@dannylinc6247]

we don't know when "the beginning" was. and there is Genesis gap theory that has supporting scripture. the real expanse of the time that occurred cannot be known. really.

[@ethanweeter2732]

True, but millions of years would make no sense either.

[@dannylinc6247]

@@ethanweeter2732 the huge rubble and building blocks that are "unexplained" around the planet, the giant bones and skulls, and elongated skulls and old burial sites, there has been a lot of unrecorded history if you don't consider the scriptures, but the carbon 14 is the standard they use today, as well as core samples. They can't say how fast the ground piled up where the samples are taken. The layers that reveal a global flood are found, but we need the two types of scientists to study it without first believing what their outcome must be. They tend to find what they want to find quite often, and contradictory evidence is not acceptable to them. I think both views have done some of that. When I search questions and info I keep learning more. You can tell when the source is pushing only the presupposed view. A person has to keep digging to avoid being caught in a belief that gets evidence brought up against it alot. That shuts down the desire to see what we haven't been shown and has not been widely publicized. I sometimes find archaeological evidence, I can see it and make sense of it, and it bounces off the snouts of skeptics. I also find deliberate sites put up calling it false. but proving nothing but opinion.

[@paradigmbuster]

The six days is the making (transformation for service), not the creating (forming from nothing). The first day was when the earth was re-exposed to the sun as the water was being gathered into one place. Here we have a pre-existing universe, created in the beginning. So the time it takes for light to get from the stars, and the time for daughter elements to form in the materials become irrelevant to the 6000 years. The 6000 years begin with a pre-existing universe. The 4th day is the day the celestial body purpose and authorship was announced, not the day they were placed because there was a 4th day.

[@dannylinc6247]

@@paradigmbuster the "prexisting universe" was in the beginning. God created "the heavens and the earth" (for us and His purpose.) A beginning for the universe is a widely accepted idea and evidenced by expansion. Time and distance, right. If things move and expand at their rates, and you gather that back in reverse, can we not tell how long they have travelled away from center? And the sun changes in it's intensity and mass, as measured by man since like 1840 AD. It cannot be much more than we can calculate for it, or it would be too massive at that rate. These are factors to consider with our perception for how long it's been going on cosmologically. I was listening to Dr. Gene Kim give the support from scripture for the time between the verses that's not given as we might like. Genesis gap theory. (Fact) As his video is titled. He settles the discussion as far as he sees it. He believes the book of Genesis is all truth and supported elsewhere in the bible. He proves it for "Real Bible Believers". I sure enjoyed seeing all the ties within God's word. Proving scripture with scripture. If we don't believe we can't see it. Right Yet, we measure it and time its rate occurring. But these so called scientists keep giving us this "maybe, probably, and most likely over billions and billions" the facts don't add up to that at all.

[@1978rayking]

We are the self-governing babies, of the beings we call spiritual because all life is made from life. All life is information forever changing everything grows separate and together. Before the earth had modern humans I'm sure the earth had life before many catastrophes even became space-bearing and sea and underground. It's likely many types of things happen like the tilt of the earth and so on. I'm sure most beings have to start over that's the way of life. All riding on the self forever changing is why, the now affects the future and effects the past, information is energy everything is life making life the only self-sufficient making process. Sometimes some life don't want other life effects yet depend on each other that's the only time some life will help each other. Most the time growing pains and wars are just the start of learning since the very beginning. It most be sacred to let babies learn and life improves or life is actually abundant everything never truly not becoming and keeps starting.

[@edenicchristian335]

I didn't quite understand the part how the fossils of marsupials in Australia only appear in Australia. Could someone please explain that further?

[@diamondlife-gi7hg]

not sure but they say that marsupials originated in the amercas not australia.

[@gamerxg7789]

The truth is everything is as the same age on earth nothing was billions of year apart not even million

[@cloroxlavenderscent4307]

Well humanity as a whole is older than 6,000 years. Civilization is in fact older than 6,000 years, while the Bible states the Earth is only 6,000 years old. And no dinosaurs did not exist with humans.

[@alantasman8273]

@@cloroxlavenderscent4307 Mitochondrial DNA says otherwise. In fact when the fictitious argument that man came from apes is removed from the equation....Mitochondrial DNA proves that the original Eve lived about 6000 years ago.

[@CupOfSweetTea]

Misunderstanding science won't get you to heaven.

[@solofourohsixgaming]

Neither will believing your a descendant of a monkey. Oh by the way, if monkeys evolved to be humans, why aren't all monkeys humans? And also when do you think we will evolve again? And what will we then be?

[@CupOfSweetTea]

@@solofourohsixgaming who said we descended from a monkey? It's funny when people demonstrate your point for you.

[@solofourohsixgaming]

@@CupOfSweetTea Your very intellectually and well thought out comment is so very detailed and sofisticated it is a miracle someone could misinterpret it. So you believe the earth is billions of years old but you don't believe in evolution while also believing in heaven? Very confusing. Edit: Maybe clarify your stance and give examples of misunderstanding, so you don't create more misunderstandings.

[@solofourohsixgaming]

@@CupOfSweetTea "it's funny when people demonstrate your point for you". So you mean to tell me your comment "Misunderstanding science won't get you to heaven." Is science? So me misunderstanding your comment was also me misunderstanding science therefore proving your point for you?? Apparently your intelligence is exponentially higher than mine since you are able to conduct science with a sentence about misunderstanding science. Mind-blowing information which is going to help me advance in life and one day be as smart as you.

[@CupOfSweetTea]

@@solofourohsixgaming it just gets funnier

[@thomasmurrell6908]

If one of these cranks from Answers in Genesis told me the sky was blue and grass was green, i'd go and check for myself.

[@texastexas4541]

Single handedly he has destroyed all scientists.

[@noneyabidness9644]

And with great ease. Though, it isn't single handedly...the Spirit of God within him teaches him, and speaks through him.

[@texastexas4541]

@@noneyabidness9644 Yes, God has destroyed all scientists in one seminar. Hope this will get published in Nature and Science magazine and stun the entire world to silence.

[@noneyabidness9644]

@@taylorthetunafish5737 you haven't seen the video, or gone to college. He completely destroyed all secular science.

[@ayubnjuguna1800]

@@taylorthetunafish5737 is it why the Scientific revolution was driven by God believers? Most Great inventions have been by Theists?

[@texastexas4541]

@@taylorthetunafish5737 God allowed humans to make these new technologies so that his children can enjoy FB, internet, Instagram and twitter. God also made animals so that humans can eat meat to stay strong and healthy.

[@lederereddy]

Does anyone else find it disturbingly counter-intuitive when a supposedly bible-believing Christian tries to discredit God's creative genius by saying it was smarter or more challenging for Him to create the universe by using the big bang and evolution over billions of years? How is adding "billions of years of disease, deformity, and death" smarter? One guy said his problem was accepting the 6000 years and he used Isaiah 55:something "My ways are not your ways and My thoughts are not your thoughts. As the heavens are higher than the Earth, so My thoughts are higher than your thoughts." But not all of His thoughts! He spelled out the creation event quite plainly and repeatedly in Genesis and other books of the Bible so that we would "know" how, when, and why He did it! The problem people have with the Genesis account isn't "Biblical interpretation!" It's one of faith. Will you believe what God has said? Because there is nowhere in the Bible that teaches the Earth is billions of years old or that Darwinian evolution is what God used. That is all deliberately added onto God's word, while, simultaneously, denying what is written.

[@colindiplock]

There was a flood, but the writer took poetic license. How many days after the flood was the account put to the written word?

[@alantasman8273]

So you're saying God when he told Moses about the flood forgot the details....are you saying God suffers form dementia.

[@johngregory5424]

The flood took place, the waters covered the highest mountains by 15 cubits. Seen from space the earth would be a floating bubble of water. What happened next? If the water dispersed by flowing from one area to another area the result would be total devastation. If it just evaporated, how long would that take? .

[@COFFEEMAMMI]

It was total devastation. Everyone and thing on earth perished. We had a bad flood out were I live that covered highways and streets..within hours it subsided. Going back to what u said... Catastrophic and devestating hmmm That is what God set out to do....but Noah and all in the ark were saved by God to replenish the earth.

[@COFFEEMAMMI]

Also if you read the Bible it took over a year until Noah found out there was land from setting out a bird several times until it did not return to the ark. Telling him indeed land was surfacing.

[@christophercoupe5006]

I think u r wondering how water could cover the highest mountains? Well these mountains were no where near as high before the flood. Due to fast plate tectonics during and after the flood they rose to their present heights.

[@johnmirth7161]

THANK YOU FOR YOUR GREAT WORK FROM CANADA EH

[@hasimhodzic9649]

The world was not perfect because God said it was very good. God will curse you if you add to his word. The world was corruptible, you know that this is true because of it’s present state. God made the Earth corruptible because it was always part of His plan not some after thought, the same as the new Heavens and the new Earth will be incorruptible ( that means that it cannot be corrupted). God is perfect in what He does even when His plan has to include a universe a little less than perfect to achieve his purpose.

[@crazyflowerlady1060]

God is perfect and all that He does is perfection. Man corrupted the earth when he sinned.

[@Carlo42]

So are you saying that God created a corrupted world? Prove it. Have you read Genesis 1 to 3? When do you think evil entered history? It was definitely not at Creation as it was perfect at that time. God was very pleased with His Creation and it was only when Eve was deceived by the serpent and Adam chose to eat the fruit that sin and evil came into the world. God did not make the world corruptible, and you cannot prove your point because Genesis 1 and 2 state that God was pleased with His Creation. Be careful when saying about others adding to God's Word as you could be doing that very thing.

[@hasimhodzic9649]

@@crazyflowerlady1060 are you trying to say that God didn’t know that man would sin? Have you really thought this through? Do you think that the new Heavens and the new earth will be corruptible? The Bible says that when we are Raptured out of here we first put on incorruptible bodies, what do you think that that means? And if it means as I believe that we can no longer be corrupted, why do you think that God didn’t just make us that way in the first place. Please try and prayerfully read your Bible and you might yet understand what it is teaching us about the Sovereignty of our Great God and Creator. God is not a man that He should make a mistake, He Created man knowing that man would fall as a necessary part of the process to achieve the end product which is the end product. I know you have obviously no understanding of this because of your comment. Check out Genesis when God had finished Creating everything that He had made, He looked at everything and said “ behold, it is very good”, unless you have a bad translation it should have words to that effect or you can try looking at the Greek in biblehub. Jesus said too The Father while He was in the garden praying before they came to take Him to be Crucified,” if it is possible please take this cup from Me yet not My will but Your’s be done”, don’t you think that if God had some other plan that could achieve His final objective He might have scraped this one and started over. You are subject to a lot of what has become traditional false teaching and they even twist the very Word of God to do it. God Created the Angels, you cannot blame mankind for them falling, exactly one third of them, is that some kind of coincidence? They have no hope of Salvation only to look forward to the lake of fire. Do you think that God made some kind of mistake with them? I think that you have a very low opinion of the ability of The God who Created this universe and all that he made, you need to revise your understanding of the word perfect. God’s Plan has always been perfect and the final achievement will be perfect and God will have demonstrated all of His attributes.

[@SokemRokemRobot]

Before the original sin, God's creation was "very good", just as God's Word says.

[@pietro4772]

The village atheists are getting pissed. Arms flailing murderously toward anyone brave enough to mention God the Creator. The great Chuck Missler had a magnificent lecture on the improbability of evolution. In essence, in the science of mathematics there is a point when an event is deemed an impossibility. From memory that point is something like 1 chance in 10 with another 15 or so zeros after it. I may be wrong on the actual number but from a mathematical point of view it is deemed impossible. Evolution, he explained, even surpasses that point of impossibility. Therefore, science itself says evolution is a fairytale for adult babies and the faithful in the religion of scientism and star trek.

[@MrMcera]

According to 4Esdras 2.9, I would say that fossils are "terrones de pez" (Biblia del Oso, español): Cuya tierra está vuelta en terrones de pez, y en montones de cenizas, tales torn áronse los que no me han escuchado, dice el Señor Todopoderoso.

[@markclark4154]

There is no need for science and the super natural to be at odds. Both play an important role in their respective places.

[@SuperTreemendus]

What evidence is there that the super natural exists?

[@bobvadney7240]

@ 38:28... yet the whole spectrum of evolution was built on the " simple cell..." syndrome...to complex...ha ha...great presentation...

[@cloroxlavenderscent4307]

Do you realize the time it took to go from single celled organism to humans and the bio diversity we had. The answer is billions of years. That's why the fossil layers show increasing diversity as you go up the rock layers.

[@truthgiver8286]

At 250 million years old the Kaibab limestone is the youngest geologic layer found in the Grand Canyon. Although it is now 7,000 feet above sea level this layer was formed due to deposition from an ocean full of fish, brachiopods, and other marine life. It was the geologic uplift of the Colorado Plateau that moved this layer to its current elevation. It is impossible to have a global flood there is not enough water on the planet.

[@markjohnson8782]

Do more research.

[@truthgiver8286]

@@markjohnson8782 Get a brain radio active decay would have fried the earth if it were only 6,000 years old. Your problem is you believe the fairy stories of Bronze age men who knew practically nothing about the earth or science Exodus 13:21 And the LORD went before them by day in a pillar of a cloud, to lead them the way; and by night in a pillar of fire, to give them light; to go by day and night: Yep your god was a volcano.

[@walkergarya]

@@markjohnson8782 More research will only find more evidence against the fairy tale of Noah's Flood.

[@markjohnson8782]

@@walkergarya your response is proof you never fact checked your own beliefs.

[@sologamer3122]

​@Mark Johnson for real, the mere fact that you find modern animals under dinosaurs ALONE disproves the theory. Nevermind zero erosion between layers, soft tissue found in dinosaur bones, trees going through 100 or more layers all over the world that are supposed to be millions of years old. Don't you love how the ones who claim no research will change evolution, end being the ones who do the least amount of research.

[@renemaessen8796]

Details as these only can exist if you burry something very quick with a lot of mud fine mud. All living things in a place like afrika gets compleetly reused in nature including the bones are used for food see tge animal life in afrika.

[@joshua.snyder]

Setting aside the fact that a global flood never happened; genetic drift, availability of materials, the physics impossibility of the ark staying intact, all disprove the Noah's ark story. It's just that, a story.

[@moonoggin]

I did see a waitress once who had a backside that you could have set a cup & saucer on, it was sticking out so bad. It's the only person I've seen like that, until yesterday and I saw a male that could have passed for a beginning male with the ridge brow sticking way out on his forehead and overly hairy. Those 2 are the only ones I've seen that looked like evolution was left over in their beings. Great video.

[@stevepierce6467]

Just go to Walmart or Kmart to see numerous transitional creatures every hour. The say we were not there to witness evolution, but lo, I say unto thee, come with me and see living evolution in action. There are many beings of other species, and I am not sure but what there might even be creatures of different genus too.

[@stankomalceski9677]

The debate between creationists and atheists needs to start again.a palaeontologist by the name of Mary Schweitzer and Susan wittmeyer have found probable blood vessels bone building cells and connective tissue in a t-rex.it can’t be millions of years old

[@SokemRokemRobot]

@@therick363 Saying it's millions of years old would be ridiculous. The tissue should not exist, if the T-Rex is 70 million yrs old, and there shouldn't be stretchy, stinky, red tissue inside the bones. For someone to think that's possible just don't understand how long 70 million years is. Mary Schweitzer said,"It's utterly shocking", when the tissue was found.

[@Joenerk]

@@SokemRokemRobot Research it. This was fossilised tissue. There is no recent date as you claim.

[@burntgod7165]

Ah, another lying creationist. Schweitzer is a Christian, and she is hugely critical of creationists for hijacking and misinterpreting her discoveries. Read her paper, not a creationist's interpretation (lies).

[@planmet]

God moved in mysterious ways - creating the trilobite which no longer exists - and things we can't even see such as viruses. He created thousands of species of dinosaurs, 6000 years ago, which unfortunately couldn't fit on the Ark.

[@toddnetland366]

I believe in time travel. I am praying that the Lord will give somebody an ex÷incentive of time travel back to the antediluvian world and the Flood that ensued.

[@Hydroverse]

Even if time travel was possible, it doesn't imply a person would comprehend everything that was going on. Plus, why would anyone believe them since not even someone who is raised from the dead wouldn't be believed in? If God wanted people to know more than what's already in the Bible, then visions would make more sense.

[@michaelszczys8316]

Whenever talking about creation and the beginning of everything I have to remind people that they need to start at Genesis 1 and go back from there. How before Genesis 1 there really was ' nothing ' ( nothing material ) Before God created a single hydrogen atom of matter He had to create the place for it to exist as well as the ' science ' for it to exist. Even empty space without a thing in it is still a ' place '.

[@ethanweeter2732]

Yeah, that is why I think the Earth is young, but some of the Universe could be quite old.

[@michaelszczys8316]

@@ethanweeter2732 another thing is people like to think of eternity as being a long ' time '. It's not a time at all but rather a place without ' time ' The Lord lives outside of time. ' time ' is one of His creations.

[@michaelszczys8316]

@All About Britain putting ' science ' before God. I'm talking before creation everything, even the ' science ' behind everything only existed in the mind of God.

[@michaelszczys8316]

Matter, gravity, and even empty space are all creations of the spiritual God

[@JesusistheonetrueGod]

'In the beginning' are the key words, that there was a beginning of substance, time and perception for all of creation. Although we define nothing as something in human terms. God is able to to truly be everlasting to everlasting despite the nothing before the beginning. Before the something became something and even the before the void, there was/is/always-will-be God who always is.

[@originalbaptistfaithapolog3751]

Thanks God for this video seminar

[@sophiaherschel567]

Oh, the old man was the producer?

[@paulhancock9030]

He doesn't understand the science he's trying to discredit.

[@alantasman8273]

Please explain where he is wrong....be specific...we will be waiting for your info.

[@parkinson1963]

Have you dealt with the heat Problem in your RATE paper that the accelerated decay required for a YEC would have melted the earths crust? You had no problem with 1.2 billion dates in your pHD paper.

[@jimmiewomble416]

For those of you who don't yet get it, these people aren't afraid of the belief in evolution. They are afraid you'll stop sending them money.

[@alantasman8273]

So evolutionist scientists are not afraid that the government (we the people) will stop funding their desperate attempts to purvey a false notion being proven wrong daily? Hummm

[@phazon6179]

If you actually listen to the evidence you'll notice they have very good points.

[@jimmiewomble416]

I did. I'm still waiting to find any evidence disproving natural history.

[@renemaessen8796]

You know that genome research has proven that the rate of mutations, degeneration of human Dna, point out to a perfect Adam as father of the human kind.

[@burntgod7165]

Please cite the paper...

[@matthewoborne1649]

until they find a rabbitt fossil in the jurrasic layer you are wrong.

[@matthewoborne1649]

@Spreading Truth not once ever has a horse been found in the same layer as a dinosaur these other things have also never once been found in the same layer dogs cats elephants giraffes etc the layers are of epochs not a flood

[@ryans8081]

​@@matthewoborne1649 But horses and dinosaurs were recorded together in historical depictions in various cultures...Ta Prohm temple in Cambodia has a Stegosaur stone carving alongside a wild horse, water buffalo, and Asian elephant stone carving, all completed circa 1200 AD. So Stegosaurs had to have lived alongside Horses, Buffalo, and Elephants 800 years ago for that to have been made by the Cambodian Artisan at the time. Carlisle Cathedral also has a 1496 brass carving of two sauropods on the tomb of bishop Richard Bell, alongside brass carvings of dogs, bears, birds, fish, and bats. Clearly, those animals, Dinosaurs and humans had to co-exist for the artists living roughly 500 years ago to accurately depict them in Carlisle Cathedral.

[@matthewoborne1649]

@@ryans8081 I think you had better listen to a real opinion on it for starter the frill around the head is a decoration on most of the animals depicted,

[@ryans8081]

@@matthewoborne1649 No, the plates are clearly depicted as part of the animal when you look at the context on the wall. Also, how do you explain the brass carvings of sauropods at carlisle cathedral?

[@matthewoborne1649]

@@ryans8081 you are talking about the survival of an animal thought to be extinct as palaentologists have found with mammoths pockets of mammoths survived after the majority died off, I have no objection to the survival of pockets of what we consider dinosaurs and other extinct creatures. that however doesnt put a rabbit in the jurassic era. as rabbits had not evolved at that stage as is clearly show in the fossil record

[@bradleyburns6695]

What about fossilized humans? Please don’t take it as a dumb question but wouldn’t there be a ton of human fossils if the floods were rapid and sudden?

[@christophercoupe5006]

There are human bones mixed with dino bones in the phosphorous? layers in the SE USA.

[@Hydroverse]

The Flood wasn't a spontaneous thing, but took place over a period of months. As for the lack of human fossils, it is hypothesized that there weren't that many humans at that time if the Ark wasn't made just for Noah's family and the animals, but the entire human race. This is based on the idea that if Noah was a preacher of righteousness by telling people to repent and be saved from the coming calamity, then the boat had to be big enough to accommodate all human beings at that time in order for the chance to be saved to be possible. Then again, if everyone repented, then would the Flood have ever happened?

[@klouis1886]

Where in the Bible does it say nothing died before Adam and Eve sinned?

[@SokemRokemRobot]

*"Therefore, just as through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men, because all sinned."* Romans 5:12

[@gbeaver57]

It fascinating the flood buried all these animals is such ordered layers. Not a single mammal in Precambrian rock. No non avian dinosaurs past the KT boundary. If all these animals existed together it’s crazy to think they all died in specific orders all over the world. And that order just happens to appear as evolution occurred. What a crazy coincidence.

[@ecardy23]

It's also crazy to see petrified trees standing straight up, running through a few layers of strata at a time. It's almost as if they took millions of years to grow which is pretty interesting.

[@ecardy23]

It's also interesting to see some modern day amphibians and reptiles buried along side dinosaurs. One would probably think they lived together hundreds of millions of years ago but the bone structure of those amphibians and reptiles still look the same today.

[@gbeaver57]

@@ecardy23 but not a single modern mammal. I guess they were all just better swimmers than dinosaurs.

[@ecardy23]

@@chriscuomo9334 @Chris Cuomo it says Adam was 130 years old when he had Seth. If you add the dates you get around 6000 years ago. Obviously they were in the garden before they had Seth so one can say maybe 50 to 100 years they were they were there until the fall. The speculation of the universe and the billions of light years some stars are away from us assumes you believe they all were at one point together and exploded. This is easily argued that when God created the universe who could say he didn't create the stars and planets already in the position they are today? The word universe comes from 2 Latin words. Uni meaning one and verse meaning spoken sentence. The universe is one spoken sentence. Genesis 1:1 is that spoken sentence. It's clear and simple to explain where and how the geologic column came from. There was a massive flood. Why are there fossilized seashells on too of the highest mountain in the world? Why do we see clams buried closed some buried next to dinosaurs and we still have class alive today that loom the exact same as the buried ones?

[@gbeaver57]

@@chriscuomo9334 you could ask questions like “How many billions of years Adam was in the garden?” Or “How do we see light from stars billions of light years away if the universe is only 6,000 years old?” But the simplest is just pointing out that the earth with plants isn’t older than the sun, moon, and stars.

[@ricktraver2532]

Was cool until he added all of the religious mumbo jumbo.

[@johnh3163]

This man is not religious He is only telling you the truth that there is a a creator ( God) Religious people have no idea what this man is talking about

[@EternalVisionToday]

So, without the "religious mumbo jumbo" what do you think of the case made in this presentation?

[@marceloribeirosimoes8959]

I am struggling trying to find an acceptable aanswer about plants and the floor. Because, how they "re-started" after an year under salty water? I can't give unbelievers good answer...

[@rl7012]

Not all the land was under water. There were some areas of land that did not get flooded. Also it is very easy and quick for plants to reproduce and develop new breeds etc.

[@andys208]

Excellent

[@l1CappYl1]

One thing is clear, the forbidden fruit was not a cherry tree, because the amount of cherry picking here is miraculous.

[@ByGraceThroughFaith777]

1 hour presentation. But can you refute those cherries? See the problem is "scientists" are using fossils to prove an old earth and an old earth to prove evolution and evolution to add years to the fossils and it's a circular logic that falls apart with the "cherries" that make no sense nore fit any of the anti-creation theories. Y'all say "show me prove of God", but when the evidence is presented you call it cherries.... welp, that's on you now.

[@l1CappYl1]

Seems the reply was redacted before I had a chance to respond. Perhaps they realized those "cherries" are indeed refutable.

[@cloroxlavenderscent4307]

Yeah that tree was a mcguffin tree. It served a rhetorical purpose for the said text. It wasn't an apple or a cherry tree. But I like your original post.

[@ericanderson7346]

It baffles me that in the 21st-century people still believe this

[@billionairegenius]

Well, it baffles me that in the 21st century, with what we know about so many different areas of science, that people STILL believe in Darwin's outdated ideas, let alone more non answers we have for the origin of the universe. It's all a joke.

[@ericanderson7346]

@@billionairegenius You should know that Darwin is the tip of the iceberg. A whole lot has been discovered in the 140 years since his death. You folks like to harp about Darwin while ignoring genetics, which is far more powerful evidence for evolution. The hypotheses for the origin of the universe are at least attempts to make educated guesses to search for answers, unlike resigning oneself to Bronze Age myths and calling it a day. It’s the 21st Century. Revelations is about 80 generations late now.

[@raccoon6072]

Some people like to use there brain, others don't.

[@EternalVisionToday]

Yet, you didn't provide a counter argument for the case made in this video? I doubt you watched the entire presentation. Can you address these arguments that counter current scientific consensus presented at 45:23 stromatolites 47:01 coelecaths 48:30 crabs/crayfish 52:40 birds 54:31; 57:42 the fossil sequence argument for burial via flood 59:59 tracks of animals counter placement of animal remains at other positions within fossil record.

[@raccoon6072]

@@EternalVisionToday read my first comment, it's a very short statement. Then go to a library. Look for books on fossils, geology, paleontology, anything remotely linked science dealing with isues going beyond 6000 years. Then we talk further. No need to discuss this with me for now. There is a landslide of evidence that will wipe you off your feet.

[@walkergarya]

As Noah's Flood is a fairy tale and all these fossils were preserved in a wide range of times and conditions, it is impossible for one event to have made them all.

[@walkergarya]

@Darwins Myth Nope. Your fairy tale flood NEVER happened. There are many examples of fossils buried in very different conditions, volcanic ash, fresh water muds, salt water burial, dry sands and these fossils have been dated to a very wide range of ages precluding that they are all the result of a single event. Your dismissal that these fossils come from a range of ages is simply a lie.

[@slavicunited1268]

@@walkergarya isn't it insensitivity calling it a fairytale?

[@walkergarya]

@@slavicunited1268 No, it is an accurate statement.

[@historicworker]

we are all wrong...there were millions of humans preflood, yet we have no human fossils? interesting

[@SokemRokemRobot]

For there to be human fossils, humans would need to be caught in mudslides. If humans stayed away from the mudslides, they wouldn't become fossils.

[@TheSilkroadvideo]

Read different books....I suggest non fiction...😑

[@westb1028]

Wisdom begins with the fear of God.

[@summergivens242]

@@westb1028 And that's why you go along with Christianity. Fear !

[@westb1028]

@@summergivens242 I go with Christianity because it’s true. 😇

[@summergivens242]

@@westb1028 It's based on faith.

[@westb1028]

@@summergivens242 isn’t everything?

[@kiwibass6207]

At least when mature people visit Disneyland they know its fantasy.

[@bcarnett5930]

The only creature that does disturb me, although it's also possible it's proof of mankind being as advanced as we are today pre-flood (genetic engineering) but the creature is the platypus, there's just something very strange about a poisonous beaver duck !! Lol either way I'm glad the creator at least stopped at one poisonous mammal from an egg! If a basilisk comes from a roosters egg , what caused the platypus? 😆 🤣

[@Pyr0Ben]

Everyone loves accusing this guy of lying. Instead of hollow accusations, I would like some counterevidence.

[@kiwibass6207]

Snelling has been published in standard geological publications estimating the age of geological specimens in billions of years, but has also written articles for creationist journals in which he supports a young-earth creationism viewpoint. Don't you Creationists have problems with his credibility? It's a pity that these people with credentials don't have their qualifications removed when they so flagrantly lie. Heck in law that happens, look at Rudy Guiliani, haha.

[@ByGraceThroughFaith777]

Can you point to the articles you make reference to?

[@kiwibass6207]

@@ByGraceThroughFaith777 Hi, as you're aware KZbin don't allow you to post links but I've found details of his published work for mining companies in Australia. Here's an excerpt where Snelling firmly places the earth at billions of years old. I suggest that you copy the excerpt to find the published article. I guess that uranium mining takes precident over beliefs if the price is right. "The Archaean basement consists of domes of granitoids and granitic gneisses (the Nanambu Complex), the nearest outcrop being 5 km to the north. Some of the lowermost overlying Proterozoic metasediments were accreted to these domes during amphibolite grade regional metamorphism (5 to 8 kb and 550° to 630° C) at 1870 to 1800 Myr. Multiple isoclinal recumbent folding accompanied metamorphism."

[@ByGraceThroughFaith777]

@@kiwibass6207 cool, but the contents of this presentation can be checked against real data, independent of whatever the reputation of the presenter is. No? Or is he making anything up?

[@kiwibass6207]

@@ByGraceThroughFaith777 His data and creationist papers are only published within creationist circles. Therefore peer review isn't utilized.

[@ByGraceThroughFaith777]

@@kiwibass6207 if the information presented here and all other presentations factually corroborated the creation by God, and all scientists agreed to the conclusion that God indeed created earth and the universe and everything within it, would you accept it?

[@dennislarson9560]

This "theory" is very similar to the flat earth, the" faked: moon landings, ad nauseum.

[@Krakondack]

In the sense that it's not mainstream? Because there's a huge gap in cred. between a flat earth, and questioning the moon landing.

[@bartreauconstruction]

"Theory"

[@Steph737]

💖💖💖 🌊🌊🌊