Atheists Do NOT Like This Part of Noah’s Ark

[@monteclark1115]

What would really impress me, is if they would load the ark with real animals and 8 people and float it on the water for a whole year and see how things work out.

[@TV-ob1if]

Doubtful that would impress you either

[@jhunethehunterlofttv7960]

God protect the arch from the whole time day and year

[@monteclark1115]

@@jhunethehunterlofttv7960 gap theory .

[@stpeter7432]

Good idea but that would be almost like a scientific experiment! Could we vote for who would crew it? I suggest Ken Ham, Matt Powell and "Dr" Kent Hovind for a start. At least we would get rid of those wastes of space for a year!

[@davidmeyr4558]

Of course, you need to add the 50-70 decades AIG estimates it took to build the 510 foot thing to survive catastrophic flooding using only pegs and untreated lumber. I bet Ham was on wood rot and bilge pump duty 'cause that baby would have taken on a lot of water.

[@6SecondSilence]

Wow, what an accomplishment! Noah and fam found a way to keep 325,000 gallons of drinking water and 400 tons of diverse food (meats, grain, etc.) fresh and safely consumable for a year. And without electricity? Amazing! It's almost unbelievable.

[@StayBlessed47]

I'm surprised you do believe it.. lol

[@theroamer2663]

@@StayBlessed47 (I'm pretty sure they're being sarcastic)

[@StayBlessed47]

@@theroamer2663 Scrolling through the comments I might have to agree with you.

[@djarmstrong23]

Well he was like 800 years old so he had gained a lot of wisdom

[@eddriver7815]

@@djarmstrong23 AND HE WAS THE YOUGEST IN THE FAMILY

[@DaveRod76]

If I could just give one constructive suggestion: Think about how you would want to be treated on a guided tour. You ought title the videos professionally, invitingly, friendly, & courteously, as you would be inviting guest on a guided tour through your exhibits. The video itself is as friendly and inviting as anyone would expect to be treated on a guided tour. Answers in Genesis features a lot of professionals that give seminars in a matter-of-fact way. "Atheist Do NOT Like This..." and similar titles sounds petty, childish and confrontational, and not as matter-of-fact as it out to be. Are we confrontational, or are we seeking souls? Rather, I suggest crafting titles that tell us what the video is about. For example, this video could have simply have been titled, "Methods Noah Could Have Used to Care for the Animals Aboard the Ark." Simple; it tells me what the video is about, and what I can expect to learn from it. Trust me, you will get the confrontational atheist commenting any ways, but confrontation won't be blamed on you. Thanks, God bless.

[@steveg1961]

There are two other points about the title that you didn't mention. The title is in actuality a lie. First of all, atheists LIKE creationists - and they like young earth creationists the most of all. The reason for this is precisely because young earth creationist belief is itself a great demonstration, and such an obvious example, of the fundamentally irrational nature of religious belief. Second, the very premise of the title's remark is completely bogus - this is because, in reality the vast majority of NON-atheists (i.e., theists) around the world reject the religious doctrine of young earth creationism and disagree with young earth creationists JUST LIKE ATHEISTS DO. Indeed, even the vast majority of Christians around the world reject young earth creationism - and they think young earth creationism pseudoscience is just as bogus as atheists do. It's because of this obvious fact, that the very premise of the title is a lie: Every single time a creationist tries to pretend that this is some kind of "theists versus atheists" debate, he is literally employing a blatant lie. Of course, that is certainly NOT the only lie employed in creationist rhetoric. Creationist rhetoric is absolutely PERMEATED with all sorts of different lies like this, from one end to the other. It's all of these lies, big and little, that fill creationist rhetoric, because belief in creationism, and young earth creationism especially, literally REQUIRES all of these lies in order to sustain it and promote it.

[@DaveRod76]

@@steveg1961 I would agree that the title is presumptuous, unless there is some kind of a way to measure the reaction of atheist that shows that atheist actually "do not like this part..." For example, does it always stump them in debates, is there a poll, a statistic; was there a questionaire that went out? Personally, I don't think the point of any ministry should be to "stump" the opposition to the Gospel. I don't see anywhere in the Bible when God asks us for help to defend his existance, and to scientifically validate the Word of God. Certainly, we should not intentionally provoke animosity in those who are already offended by the Word of God. Our job is not to mock "weak arguemnents," or talk down to people if they make arguements with little scientific evidence or big words. Worldly scoffers, and mockers and opponents to God will always be around, and increasingly more so in these latter times. But, our job as Christians is to bear the brunt of it with patience, not with rebuttles, and counter-mocking and counter-scoffing. Our job is to simply present the Good news that God provided the Lamb of God, Jesus Christ, to be a substitute for our execution in judgment. The sin of Adam courses through our veins. We are the blood enemies of God by virtue of our Adamic ancestry. But God had mercey on us, like He had mercy on Noah and his family, insomuch that He has provided another Ark of Salvation for anyone who chooses to enter through the door. Praise God.

[@truewordz777]

@ D Rodriguez You are right from one perspective. However the click bait phenomenon has been employed here and without question has served it's purposes.

[@truewordz777]

@@steveg1961 It appears the atheist will always be entertained by facts they cannot comprehend or are afraid to ponder. The lack of understanding generates a notion of fear and always has a response of ridicule or profanity. This acts as a mechanism to make quite any aroused interest in uncomfortable truth. Shame really because they are willingly ignorant. However we Christians are compelled by God's love to lay the truth before them so they have opportunities to hear truth and are without excuse when judgement is executed. I genuinely fear for them. The collective bravado that encourages them to ignore things that really matter.,,😟

[@carlc5748]

Good point! Did you know with your last name that you could have sephardic jewish roots in your family history?

[@zepptar]

I’m an atheist, and I watch all of this stuff. It is very entertaining.

[@GOG-KING]

LOL Yepper!

[@jasmijnariel]

Cant get a better laugh... perhaps a flat earther🤔

[@GTO_CAL]

Keep watching ,guarantee u won't stay an atheist I've seen it happen

[@hoppyandhisholidayhelpers1714]

entertaining and educational, I learned so much. apparently, the dinosaurs. excuse me, pterosaurs, 18:05 "presumed extinct" were on Noah's Ark 5,000 years ago. way cool. I was always taught the Cretaceous period was much older than 5,000 years ago. but the proof is in the penguins, who can not only live in warm climates, but they also live at the south pole and polar bears live at the north pole, and that's proven science. so dinosaurs must have been on Noah's Ark. chas v'shalom, I had it all wrong for so long

[@garybowman9566]

Apparently, you have not considered the fact that atheism is philosophically untenable. I will assume that you do not claim to know every mystery in the universe. Once you are willing to admit that you do not know everything in the universe, for all you know God is somewhere hidden in the holes of your knowledge. If on the other hand, you claim to know everything, then you have just made yourself the Supreme Being that you deny ... that is quite the conundrum for you. The best that you can claim is agnosticism; maybe there is and then again maybe there is no God. But atheism is a logical fallacy.

[@tommysellering4224]

The funny thing is that you deny evolution as a way for animals to develop, but then propose an extremely fast evolution from the moment of the ark landing on Ararat to allow for the few "Kinds" of animals on that boat to develop to all the current animals. Such a rapid evolution is a pure fiction because that simply is not possible at the speed it had to have developed over just a few thousand years. And also it is quite amazing that the predators on the Ark obviously did not need to eat anything for several years after the flood until there were enough reproduction of the herbivores to have reached a population that could have withstood some "Culling" from predators. Were all predators in hibernation for a few hundred years or what?

[@leftadrift3920]

Thats what im saying, as amazing as that replica looks...does not prove anything

[@dpwellman]

Not "evolution" purported change in genetic information, natural selection-- loss or suppression of genetic information-- see Mendel. This is especially true for r selected populations compared to K selected.

[@redpoppy3569]

God shut the lions' mouths when Daniel was thrown into pit and He put Adam to sleep during Eve's creation so He could've put them into a slow motion existence or whatever. Yet, this is a guessing game on the part of the exhibit creators so since no one knows 100% what the kinds looked like they had to do their best.

[@Jillousa]

They believe in evolution within kinds but do not believe in evolution as far as one kind morphing into another kind. For example, from cats you get all kinds of cats but they don't believe that a cat could turn into a dog.

[@JCnumber1]

It’s “variation” not evolution. One kind can have many different variations. We are all one humankind but with many different visual variations within our kind. We’ve bred dogs to be very different from one another in a very short period of time. The early animal kinds as they repopulated the earth could have displayed variation quickly as they traveled to survive. But a bear doesn’t change into a tiger. In Genesis all animals were herbivores. Once man sins by disobeying God it brought death to all things. After sin animals began killing each other. The New Testament explains how the whole earth along with all the animals groan like birth pains waiting for man kinds redemption. The predictor animals on the ark could have easily eaten plants and then once the earth has repopulated they could have easily reverted back to killing and eating meat. If you don’t believe in God and the Bible it will be impossible to believe anything the Ark Encounter is presenting.

[@Thomas-ni1jn]

AIG got a few points though on this. This is one of the few times I have seen a video by creationists, directed at atheists, that has comments enabled. Large claps over here.

[@michaelmcdonald8452]

What a stunning and brave choice to allow for criticism.

[@ervindark]

To be fair, it's also one of the few times (in my experience) where a creationist video has so few vulgar remarks by atheists regarding creationists intelligence.

[@Thomas-ni1jn]

@@ervindark Yes, atheists can be better about this. Myself included.

[@tookie36]

I was stunned when I saw the comments were open.

[@michaelmcdonald8452]

@@tookie36 and we're all super impressed with that observation

[@dougkelly1933]

How does she figure aquatic animals wouldn't need to be on the ark? Even if there was not enough freshwater to dilute the salinity of the oceans, which would kill marine animals, freshwater fish would have been doomed.

[@ToddCopeland]

Don't being science and obvious fact into this discussion!

[@stevenkinney2740]

Their standard answer here.......MAGIC! lol

[@alantasman8273]

"How does she figure aquatic animals wouldn't need to be on the ark" Well since there was already plenty of water outside the Ark ...I guess those creatures would have enough to survive on their own. By the way, fossils of entire whales and many other aquatic creatures have found perfectly preserved in coal seems and rock strata....so yes, many, not all of them were buried during the flood.

[@marius4278]

@@alantasman8273 you didn‘t understand his comment at all. fish are specialised to live in waters with salt levels that match in what kind of water they evolved. fresh water fish die in salt water and vice versa

[@redpoppy3569]

The bible only states fowl, creeping and beasts. No aquatic animals are mentioned.

[@theangrygamer1008]

Love how all the modern solutions to the problems are presented as being how it was done 6000 years ago.

[@gauchetvanantwerpen147]

The more things change.. the more they are the same

[@NBGTFO]

It wasn't done 6000 years ago. It wasn't done ever. It's a fairy tale.

[@gauchetvanantwerpen147]

@@NBGTFO even with alll the proof that is presented. Those that do not want to see, let them remain blind;-)

[@morbincentral3607]

@@NBGTFO when you are judged by God, you will find out it isn’t a fairytale. Trust me, God is real. Creation is proof. The Big Bang makes no sense and goes against science “matter can not be created or destroyed,” but somehow creation just came from nothing. A creator only makes sense

[@DaveRod76]

@@NBGTFO How do you know?

[@alechawkins8350]

As an atheist...... I really like this

[@salvation4all313]

You are not going to like burning in hell for eternity.

[@joemariejames4757]

Plot twist: you really aren't an atheist.

[@theovanrossum8652]

@@joemariejames4757 But it's so amusing. What's there not to like?

[@redfuse8369]

God bless you Alec :)

[@CynicalDude]

What are you waiting for friend?

[@kristofsportingdogs3549]

So many questions: 400 tons of food… how many years does one man needed to harvest it? Where were they stored while he was building the ark? How long did one man needed to build this ark? How long did he need to collect all the species?

[@JCnumber1]

Took Noah roughly 100 years to build the ark so plenty of time for all things considered

[@MrCanis4]

In their story someone can live to be 600 years old, mm so, maybe . . .

[@redpoppy3569]

Read the Bible.

[@kristofsportingdogs3549]

@@JCnumber1 so he build such a boat on his own and harvested 400 tons of food too in the same time? Have you ever talked to a farmer? What do you think? That farmers don’t have to do a lot of work to produce their crops, so they have time for a little sideproject like constructing a giant boat? And how old did Noah get then if he already Needed 100 years for his boat?

[@kristofsportingdogs3549]

@@redpoppy3569 you know people wrote the bible? It is not as if god handed down the first copy to us. No, people wrote it, and in all the centuries that followed, people rewrote it countless of times before the printingpress. And you still think that thing is the actual word of god that needs to be interpreted to the letter? You guys are funny 😄

[@BrianBadondeBo]

My favorite part of the story is when the ark landed the carnivores waited long enough for the herbivores to reproduce before eating them.

[@anitasantanita6766]

Yup! God controlled the animals’ instincts for the family’s safety in the time until the ark landed (and also to make them mass migrate to the upper Mesopotamian Valley where Noah’s ark was before the flood) so it’s likely that this lasted a bit longer.

[@danielblair4413]

Rig Driscoll says: *My favorite part of the story is when the ark landed the carnivores waited long enough for the herbivores to reproduce before eating them.* There were no carnivores on the Ark because all animals ate plants prior to Noah's flood. What was on the Ark were the herbivore ancestors of carnivores and those carnivores descended or evolved sometime after Noah's flood after the population of animals had already increased.

[@Rob2000]

@@danielblair4413 evolved?????? descended ????????? so Evolution is true..........

[@donchristie420]

@@Rob2000 😂

[@Pikee]

@@Rob2000 nobody has ever denied the ability for animals and plants to adapt over time. That's a straw man

[@killajive1]

For people that don’t believe in evolution, you think 2 of each “kind” was on the boat only? How did the kinds get so different and have so many of each “kind”? Like how did there become 23 species of foxes from a pair of animals with less than 6000 years?

[@con.troller4183]

Creationists can't even provide a biological definition of KIND.

[@linebylinebiblestudies4125]

Since (according to fundamentalists) the flood is supposed to have occurred in 2350 BC, and Abraham was born 232 years after the flood. That means most of that diversification would have had to be done in less than 232 years. Because Abraham's story is set in the late early bronze age, we have lots of evidence from that period of diverse interconnected civilizations spanning a globe full of diversity. I used to entertain the idea of a flood more like 14000 years ago (because there was a big flood) but it was not global. Which means the Noah story is more of a cautionary tale borne out of racial memory. "Fill the world with violence and the world will be destroyed" Everyone should believe that part of the story. "Do not allow the imagination of your heart to be only evil continually, or bad things happen." That's true. And that was the point. The point was never, "Oh wow, look at all the engineering Noah did." They strain out gnats and swallow camels.

[@Brian-hx9wy]

GOD is the answer. The only one I need. “For the wisdom of this WORLD is foolishness in God’s sight. As it is written: “He catches the wise in their craftiness”;” ‭‭1 Corinthians‬ ‭3:19‬ ‭NIV‬‬

[@michaelholder3933]

There is a huge difference between macro and micro evolution. Please educate yourself before you attack.

[@michaelholder3933]

@@con.troller4183 Wolf is a kind Cat is a kind If you have one of each you would have two kinds. Pretty simple.

[@Tijuanabill]

I only have two questions. 1. Where did the extra water come from, enabling the planet to be covered in water? 2. Where did the extra water go, after the flood? In order to flood even the mountain tops with water, the water level would have to have been so high, that 4 or 5 times the amount of water that exists, would have needed to exist during the flood.

[@timbuckman4578]

From where did all the water is the oceans come? What efffect would a lot of water coming and flooding a planet have on a planet? When did science tell us about oceanic trenches and ridges? Psalm 104:6 Thou coveredst it with the deep as with a garment: the waters stood above the mountains. 7 At thy rebuke they fled; at the voice of thy thunder they hasted away.8 They go up by the mountains; they go down by the valleys unto the place which thou hast founded for them. 9 Thou hast set a bound that they may not pass over; that they turn not again to cover the earth.

[@emekaossai5485]

Water evaporates. Weak argument

[@toddjohnson9586]

@@emekaossai5485 uhhh, yeah, it evaporates into the sky where it becomes clouds and then rains back down. Soo where did it all go??

[@answersingenesis]

answersingenesis.org/the-flood/feedback-where-did-all-floodwater-go/

[@phoxpharms]

Matter can not be created, nor destroyed. Another great point.

[@charlesvandenburgh5295]

A compelling argument for why the human race is doomed.

[@alitlweird]

Why’s that? You don’t state your case.

[@HooksBill]

@@alitlweird Fishing but the fish aren't biting. Maybe try a different river?

[@charlesvandenburgh5295]

@@alitlweird That you even need to ask the question after watching the video makes my point.

[@younggrasshopper3531]

@@charlesvandenburgh5295 being cryptic is not impressive

[@violet.senderhauf2187]

its a miracle we made it this far.

[@maloriezastrow971]

Sorry, I must have missed the genetic bottleneck. Amazing the diversification of life in just 6000 years! Where could I find your list of the various 'kinds' that were on the arc?

[@Asmokedetector]

Lol

[@sliglusamelius8578]

I don’t know anything about the Ark, but I do know that mitochondrial dna showed a world-wide bottleneck about 150,000 years ago. Stoeckle and Thaler data.

[@MG-fn9xw]

Life really is diverse and changes rapidly! I let a domesticated pink pig out into the wild and within weeks it had changed colors to brown and it’s face started to look like a boar more than a pig! I’ve seen the same thing happen to a domesticated rabbit that got released into the wild, it’s coat changed color and it’s ears began to sit differently on its head. THESE TWO EVENTS TOOK A COUPLE WEEKS! IT DIDNT TAKE MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF YEARS! I have many more examples that thwart the uniformitarianist doctrine that was made up by a 14 year old Charles Darwin. Imagine the theories I could come up with as a 14 year old. He was making the theory up late in the enlightenment period. His neighbors were the Jeffersons (Thomas Jeffersons family) and the Bartrams (William Bartrams family) And today we use a 14 year olds theory as our truth of truths in regards to the age of the earth, Charles Darwin thought the world looked old, therefore it must be old. This was a 14 year olds theory you are using as your truth of truths. The Bible already warns you about false idols, looks like you missed the message. Why come on here to be a naive smart aleck?

[@Asmokedetector]

@@sliglusamelius8578 do you have a link to a video or something, I want to know more about what your talking about

[@sliglusamelius8578]

@@Asmokedetector Look up Stoeckle and Thaler mitochondrial dna study online. Nobody quite knows how to interpret the result lol. I sure don’t, but apparently all extant fauna can be traced to ancestors no earlier than about 150,000 or so years ago. Since the study authors believe that life arose much earlier than that (they are committed to the standard evolution paradigm), they posit a world-wide bottleneck from some unknown cause or catastrophe.

[@TheGramee]

Amazing place to visit...gotta give credit to the effort to build this...well done.

[@markmerry1471]

yes it the best joke ever

[@HarryNicNicholas]

did you know it was flood damaged when it first went up, and they couldn't claim, very amusing. god being mysterious.

[@dgeneric7518]

I like how people forget how over-populated the boat would have become quickly. A fly has a life cycle about 28 days, and the female can lay around 120 eggs. Just 6 months in, there would be SOOOOOOO many flies. That's just 1 insect. Don't get me started on rabbits, guinea pigs, and rodents in general...

[@MrGamer-zv7xr]

Rodents would not have existed with synapsids because synapsids evolved into rodents anyways

[@jubileeYAVEL]

Umm, yes flyes still do that and we are not over populated with flys right now, I wonder how the insect population has been kept at bay all these years 🤔

[@hmonglord]

@@jubileeYAVEL yes because a fly being stuck on one boat is the same as a fly being stuck on earth which is significantly bigger then Noah boat.

[@dgeneric7518]

@@jubileeYAVEL I started with flies, then mentioned rodents. Think of the scenario: many types of animals, insects, mammals whatever breed quickly in life, and often. Pigs can breed before a year old. All these animals and insects would be mass mating... I mean, this is just so ridiculous to a lot of us.

[@joemariejames4757]

@@dgeneric7518 the ark has alien technology that is beyond our comprehension its pretty obvious.

[@fluffysheap]

And Noah said, "well, so much for the unicorns. From now on, all carnivores will be restricted to 'C' deck"

[@alantasman8273]

Nope, Unicorns are mentioned in the Bible as are dragons (Dinos)....You need to do your research.

[@dustinumholtz2864]

@@alantasman8273 the definition of unicorn as we know it today didn't come about until a few hundred years ago. The unicorn that is mentioned in the Bible is also known as the single horned rhinoceros.

[@redpoppy3569]

@@dustinumholtz2864 I'll check that. Unicorns are mentioned in book of Job, I think.

[@Yo_Ima_Goat]

The Far Side?

[@HercuLync]

Ken Hamm both claims that there were dinosaurs on the ark and that the flood wiped out the dinosaurs.

[@tobymax10]

I really like how much thought they put into how the ark functioned when every bit of scientific evidence points to the fact that it’s a myth.

[@silentghost751]

Wrong

[@TylerShacklefordDurden]

Grifters gunna grift

[@tobymax10]

@@silentghost751 what am I wrong about?

[@silentghost751]

@@tobymax10 it's not a myth

[@tobymax10]

Really? There’s no evidence at all to prove that.

[@Number6_]

I am impressed how they got all the detail and the original electric lights just like in Noah's day; and that shiny floor. It is just like being there at the time. For those who read this, this is sarcasm!

[@martinkuliza]

but this isn't ... fun Fact Since they are using actual lights, lets only talk about how long has man been using electricity this way ... Realistically (as fucking amazing as it is) we've only been using Electricity since about 150 to 200 years ago, i mean i'm not talking about when the greeks discovered the existence of electrical charge, i'm talking about THE ACTUAL PRACTICAL PUTTING TO USE OF IT (say Lights, Street Lights) Only about 200 years THAT'S A FACT !!! fucking weird, huh ?

[@andrewcady8827]

@@martinkuliza I think the Leyden Jar, invented 1745, was the first practical use of electricity. Though it wasn't commonly used by the general public, it was used in diverse scientific experiments, including those of Benjamin Franklin -- who coined the term "battery" to describe a series of such jars all lined up like a battery of cannons.

[@andrewlaeddis5025]

No silly, they had thousands of candles that they would keep lit, and a few extra tons of wax, Obviously!

[@davidbarnard1409]

You forgot to mention the AC

[@storysource889]

@@martinkuliza My mother was born in 1923 and their home had no electricity until FDR and Rural Electrification, when she was 10 or so. Just imagine!

[@nathanielwallace3537]

Which part won't atheists like? The make-believe part..or the recently edited, make-believe part..? So afraid of speculation! One of my favorites is that the Chupacabra is the love-child of the Platapus and the Unicorn(..who's still pissed he was left off the Ark!).

[@nasonguy]

This was edited recently? Was there something even more far fetched that was cut out?

[@aimtrue918]

God will not be mocked.

[@chrisyoung5929]

@@aimtrue918 Exodus 20:5 "You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me." This is a very important verse as it proves that the Bible lies. We have the statistics, loving, hating or ignoring Yahweh has no effect. Health, accidents, pregnancy, luck or any measure you name religion makes no difference. More science often helps but not prayer or religion. So yes we can mock your deity or any other and the deity does NOTHING.

[@ovidiuvergil]

@@chrisyoung5929 Exodus 20:6 "but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments."

[@aimtrue918]

@@chrisyoung5929 First, dont just grab a verse (out of context) to attempt to show yourself correct. Rightly divide, who is the writer speaking to in Exodus? Prayer has significantly changed my life and "science" wouldn't be possible without Him. No need to attempt to explain away my Lord and my God to me. Thats impossible. I have seen science be proven incorrect in my life down to the 8th generation. It is true. God is real, the Bible is real, TRUTH, and He is coming. Every knee will bow, every tongue will confess Jesus Christ is Lord, and sir that's not going to taste very good when it's too late. Which will be so very soon. I don't put Him in a box. His power is limitless. He won't be mocked. As for me and mine, we choose our Lord. I say none of this as an attack on you, If I kneew you and we could sit face to face, I'd give you my full testimony and show you through the Bible where fact cant be denied. No need to further this conversation. Good day.

[@neil9231]

It's amazing the length people go to prove mythology. It's astrotheology folks!

[@silentghost751]

Not mythology 😂

[@marioarmas1459]

@@silentghost751 pretty sure is mythology

[@Grace-sj2bo]

I don't want to cause any arguments etc, but I find it very interesting the different povs between Christians and atheists in the comments. Atheists see all this as an impossible occurrence, because they believe of no higher power (God), but Christians see that is is possible because they do believe in a God, who was with Noah, helping him, and Noah and his family weren't alone. From my own perspective, I don't struggle in believing the great flood happened. One thing I've learned is that water didn't just "rain" down, but it came up from the earth. I believe theres a study to show there's enough water beneath the earth's land to cover it all? Not too sure off the top of my head. That, I believe, is what caused glaciers and fish fossils to be found up mountains etc. I do recommend looking into the science of it as well. Also, because I do believe in God, that means I accept the fact there is a higher power whom I can't even begin to understand his power and abilities, but I know I don't have to try and understand. Hope this makes sense!

[@jennifergonzalez9129]

Amen what’s impossible for man to do, it’s all possible with God.

[@drewdrake9130]

@@jennifergonzalez9129 Could God make A equal A, and not A at the same time?

[@AdaTheWatcher]

My question is just, why didn't god just snap his fingers and kill every sinner instantly evaporating Thier bodies. I mean god could do anything right? Making this intire ark thing completely useless and a waste of time?

[@NinaR1738]

So many things I wouldn’t have made through alone, God was with me too. That’s why I believe it.

[@weedfrog1696]

It's not that we think it's impossible, it's that there is no real proof, and therefore, it cannot be stated as fact, there very well could be a God or gods, however, because there is no evidence, we can't reasonably say this is a default, especially when there is more proof backing other theories.

[@davekearney1944]

It would be fascinating to see a video of you building the ark. Did you use the tools and technology available to Noah at that time? The person-hours must have been astounding! How long do we figure it took Noah and family to do it?

[@codystephens5939]

Ken has stated in other videos they used modern tools to make the ark and there are alot of features they has to put in. The size is the only thing that's accurate. Everything else is how it could of worked in Noah's time. For example they have to put a concrete barrier as the floor for fire code, there are other examples too mentioned. The exhibits are just how things could of worked back they the aren't saying everything is exact.

[@davekearney1944]

@@codystephens5939 Did the videos provide any information on the person- hours required to build it?

[@brettmciver432]

@@davekearney1944 noah and his sons took 100 odd years to build it and who sais they never had help from paid emplyees/contractors etc

[@davekearney1944]

@@brettmciver432 I didn't offer an opinion regarding outside help in building the ark. However, I can imagine the conversation when he asked for help - "Hey Noah - what's with the big boat?". "Well neighbor..It's not a boat, it's an ark. I'm building it because there's a big flood coming, and you're gonna drown. Wanna help me with it?". You see....everyone but Noah and his kin was evil at that time, and required drowning. The first rule of ark-building is - never ask an evil person to help. They will mess it up, and when you're all done, they'll kill you and steal your ark.

[@davekearney1944]

@@brettmciver432 ....and more importantly, if you examine the syntax of my original post - I was first wondering how many person-hours were required to build the replica.

[@TheSTNPLA]

I love every single part of it... Specially the dinosaur part... I hadn't laughed like this in a while.... Pure comedic genius.

[@alantasman8273]

You need to look into the soft dinosaur tissue found on at least five continents so far. You seem dogmatic about evolution so you probably would support that soft dinosaur tissue can last 65+ millions of years. Now that would be laughable.

[@jeffreystenquist]

@@alantasman8273 cite peer reviewed publications please. What you call "soft tissue" is likely fossilized tissue that was put in a acid bath for weeks in order to separate it from something else. And it becomes softer in the process. Everytime I hear a creationist say we found "soft tissue" it turns out to be either a lie or a complete misunderstanding of what the scientists actually did.

[@Infinity-eb6mx]

@@alantasman8273 What is laughable is the willful ignorance on display here.

[@stevenkinney2740]

@@alantasman8273 Yeah let's go with that......all the non-christian scientific experts in their particular fields are alllll wrong about dinosaurs and you have it right. It's all a big huge conspiracy. (Rolls eyes)

[@alantasman8273]

@@stevenkinney2740 Soft dinosaur tissue discoveries have been made by reputable scientists who have published their research. Stop being a science denier.

[@danbeaulieu2130]

To be fair, we wont dislike it either. We will just be bored by it. A big empty barn, with no live animals in it. Just animatronic models. And no explanation of how to deal with the poop problem, or the methane problem. And a very poor attempt to distract from the full scope of the food problem.

[@duanethieme4186]

It was explained very well at the Ark Encounter and the Creation Museum!

[@amosluyk]

@@duanethieme4186 You mean it was explained to your satisfaction? Thus proving that you are not much of a thinker, and that you are willing to believe anything that agrees with the beliefs you already have. Bless you.

[@tomfoolery1967]

@@amosluyk So, just immediately run to insulting someone because they felt it was explained? While claiming you're the thinker? What are you willing to believe that fits your belief? That nothing created everything? And then took that everything that was created from nothing and ordered it? You look at a book and know it had an author. You look at a building and know it had a builder. Yet you look at creation and say, "Nope! No creator. It all just spontaneously evolved itself into complexity that cannot create itself. Logic." If you're the thinker you claim, maybe try reading Darwin's Doubt.

[@amosluyk]

@@tomfoolery1967 Not insults, just provable fact. Any person capable of clear reasoning, and open thinking, will immediately see that this parable is just that, and that attempting to 'prove' that its real is ludicrous. Just because you don't believe the other explanations that science offers, that does not make the story any more believable. I need no proofs or explanations for anything to disprove your parable. The inablility to understand this distinction is a wonderful proof of my assertiion; If you believe the absolute truth of the Bible, you have not learned to think. QED. But... its not too late! You can begin to learn any time you choose. The Bible is a wonderful, powerful work, full of profound wisdom and ancient knowledge. But it is deep. Read it on the surface only, and you will end up building a folly like this. Read it on its deeper levels, and you might just change the world for the better. The choice, as the Bible says, is yours ;) x

[@amosluyk]

@@tomfoolery1967 By the way, you are about a hundred years out of date with current evolution science. Darwin died a long time ago, and his initial musings have been developed considerably. MIght I suggest you learn about the scientific method? After you have read about that, please learn about statistics and statistical analysis. Without a good understanding of both of these, you are easily fooled by weak arguments, and unable to understand the modern world we live in. I say this several times a week to anyone who will listen. Without that knowledge we can't have a real discussion. Its all wasted words.

[@kristofsportingdogs3549]

This girl works at a zoo, I have a question for her: would see be able to take care of her entire zoo on her own, for one entire year?

[@brandonchaney1640]

in ur hypothetical did she kick off the other 7 adults documented to be there?

[@kristofsportingdogs3549]

@@brandonchaney1640 lol 😂 I’m hypothetical, and the arc of Noah is a documented fact 🤣😂🤡. But ok 8 people, the girl in the video talks about almost 7000 animals on this ship. Well then let me rephrase, can she on her own take care of 900 animals on her own for an entire year, waste-manegemant, food, let’s not forget maintenance, because a lot of animals have for instance nails or claws of some kind that naturally are maintained by extensive walking. Are they going to treat those on wild animals? And medical care? And giving birth? I see those animals are kept together, so since there’s nothing else to do they will breed like crazy and most don’t have a pregnancy longer then a years, so a lot of animals giving birth on that boat 🫣. Pretty doubtful 8 people could handle all that. Not to mention the maintenance of the ship self, those animals will break doors or something in there cage, which will need reparations to keep them safe or to keep them locked up. Besides large animals for a year in such a small environment? You think that would cause problems with their joints and muscles. This story is so far fetched that it’s ridiculous people actually believe it happened (not to mention that if all ice melts, that there still isn’t enough water to submerge the entire land.)

[@nathanwilson3081]

Ask her to explain how the kangaroos got off the ark and hopped to Australia, taking with them all traces of evidence including bones of dead. She's completely clueless to reality. Tell me I'm wrong lol

[@nathanwilson3081]

After her lame answer on kangaroos, ask her how fresh water fishes are around today when the saltwater was everywhere according to the flood. Even salt water fish could perish from too much fresh water. I feel sorry for ANY animal in their care let alone a human being seeking knowledge from them.

[@stankulp1008]

do some more research and it is possible for eight people to handle this many. consider hibernation practices of some animals and the idea that many animals would not have to be in separate cages as shown. How many people have to work on a dairy farm with 500 head? They have feedings and three a day milking. But even with modern equipping, they all have to be assisted one at a time into the pen and set up to the machines? But just keeping 500 herbivores alive is only about feeding and mucking the area a couple times a week. An entire third of the lower level could have been set up with 31,800 tons of hay and the animals allowed to eat into the wall themselves. This is enough for 500 full grown elephants for 425 days. The care would only have to be watering and mucking. The watering system could have permitted them to simply turn on a gravity fed system.

[@mdug7224]

7 weaned baby giraffes (clean animals) would need 2m³ of hay per day so a lot of space would be needed for the food. Two weaned baby hippos would need 1.5m³ of hay per day too. Weaned lambs are easier at only 0.5m³ for 150 days. I am not sure how much the 2000+ extinct dinosaurs and 220 extinct pterosuars would have needed. Nor have I worked out how much the 12 caniformia, 26 feliformia, 2 cingulata, 4 pilosa, 56 bovidae, the other 28 pecora and 4 legomorpha would need. I have missed out a lot of kind clarifications though. But we are looking at 58200kg of food for the giraffes and hippos for 150 days which occupies around 58000m³. The ark, if box shaped for maximum volume, would have volume less than 40000m³.

[@phoxpharms]

math and science, the greatest opponent of myth and fantasy

[@mdug7224]

@@phoxpharms I am not sure why the zookeeper didn't mention the need for hoses and brooms to drive the poop down through the grated floors either, particularly with the larger babies - hippos, giraffes, sauropods - or how many barrows would be needed to move it to the window...just saying....

[@gauchetvanantwerpen147]

I would suggest you relook the video.. Example: Noah did not bring all bear kinds into the ark... They brought in kinds. Example no dogs.... only a wolf. Only one bear type, not polar, brown etc. After the flood the animals did change. Please note, animals did not change from a fish to a APE.

[@mdug7224]

@@gauchetvanantwerpen147 I have limited down to the references for kinds that match what was presented in the video. So I just counted canidae for dog kind, ursidae for bear kind, etc. I didn't subdivide in current speciation. Deer kind would be cervidae and all deer come from that. Since the claim is that the species examples found in fossil layers died in the flood, each would also be a kind at that time already, don't you agree? The only other explanation would be evolution pre-flood.

[@gauchetvanantwerpen147]

@@mdug7224 Agree, the animals that were found in the fossil layers are complete animals, not in a transition from one kind to another.Whether or not each fossil layer, not sure how many, where the result of the Noah flood is debatable The debate is whether or not the story makes sense from a non-believer perspective. So dogs come from the family Canis lupus familiaris. My point is that dogs evolved after the flood. Noah would only have loaded the wolf. Similar to bears, and bambies.

[@rationalsatanist1811]

4:48 how could Noah survive on an ark what with the amount of methane gas that would build up from the animals waste ?

[@davida3283]

You don't see sails or paddles in it don't you?? Noah was wise and had a pair of V8 Rolls Royce motors that were heavily modified to have an intake of 80%methane 20%seawater, check-mate global warning

[@nasonguy]

@@davida3283 Nah nah, you got it all wrong. He cooled and compressed it to liquid methane, stored it in clay jars. Then he captured lightning to crack water, got the oxygen from it, cooled compressed stored. Then he mixed them in a chamber at the back of the Ark and there ya go, he beat Elon to the Raptor engine.

[@davida3283]

@@nasonguy rocket propulsion for an ancient Ark?? Now that is what I call innovation! Your move NASA

[@jimchumley7907]

Rational Satanist; Good question, ask God himself. I was once involved in Unitariarism. God doesn't have to answer any of our questions but when honestly challenged will answer.

[@rationalsatanist1811]

@@jimchumley7907 Which god are you talking about ? There are thousands of man made gods including the god of the bible.

[@seresimarta4436]

You suppose that atheists actually care... I don't think that an average atheist thinks more about the feasibility of the Ark as an average christian thinks about the effectiveness of human sacrifices or about the best ways to interpret what the oracle said at Delphi. We know the story, we find it interesting, it may make us think about the questions of life but we never considered for a minute that it can be true.

[@igotstoknow2]

You have been told by anti-God people it isn't true. You don't know it isn't not true.

[@seresimarta4436]

@@igotstoknow2 If it's true it's even worse. A global genocide. God killing millions of newborns with a gruesome death, but making huge efforts to save one pair of rats, one pair of grass hoppers... Everybody focuses on the handful of survivors, but if it happened today, we would all be among the victims. Close your eyes and imagine your loved ones wiggling in the water, struggling to breath. Hold back your own breath while imagining. Each and every person you ever loved, you ever knew are now corpses floating on the water. And are the surviviors any better? Surely they won't start their new life by getting drunk as an animal, making a scene butt naked? They were the chosen ones, weren't day? Whose life was spared over the millions of babies, toddlers, pregnant women and old people? I think we'd better pray this whole story is fake, because if it's true, it's the worst crime against humanity that has been ever committed by a psycho leader.

[@seresimarta4436]

@King Klebold It just shows how much of a failure the flood was. What a waste of water, killing off the planet just to have descendants like me 😆.

[@strenghsGirl]

@@igotstoknow2 you also don't know it the flying Spagetti Monster isn't true.

[@joelbailey176]

I just find it funny that recently the ark had to close due to water damage 😂 the irony of the Ark of all things getting water damage! I wonder if it has flood insurance….

[@sirbacon5481]

I want to know what food was storage on the ark, how did the fish survived, where did all the water go, and how did the ship survive the stormy oceanic planet.

[@habasch285]

@Slavery is Freedom, War is Peace what if the highest mountain was not Mt. Everest at this time? The Bibel say this in Psalm 104 , 6-8 so it could be the highest mountain was a lot smaller. What is the Problem with the Poop? They put it in to the water ?

[@Anonymous-qw]

Fish didn't need to go on the ark as they could survive in the water.

[@habasch285]

The Fish survive in water... there was a lot of water ;), the water is in the ocean and underground.. Psalm 104 6-8 the world was probably not the same before the sintflut. Genesis 6, 21 tells something about food, the ship survived with swimming ;)

[@cutlasssupreme6984]

Oh that’s easy, it never happened.

[@roqsteady5290]

It is hardly worth the bother of asking those kinds of sensible questions.

[@TenThumbsProductions]

Why are creationist using evolution to explain how Noah was able to get 2 of every animal on the arc?

[@eddiethatvoguy7901]

Cognitive dissonance

[@jeanyan7738]

Macro-evolution does not fit the bible or true science. I.E. fish to reptile and reptile to bird is pure fiction. Micro-evolution is fine such as making corn grow bigger but its still corn. The farm and agricultural sciences prove animals/plants have hard limits when it comes to change. They even try artificial genetic modification and corn will still be corn, and wheat will still be wheat, and cow will still be cows. Maybe a bit larger but still the same basic thing.

[@TenThumbsProductions]

@@jeanyan7738 why a hard limit? What would determine that?

[@eddiethatvoguy7901]

@@jeanyan7738 but micro becomes macro after enough time

[@Turtlenaide]

Difference between evolution and natural selection

[@jacobanderson1647]

This is great, I love visiting this channel when I want a good laugh💀

[@rinuvarghese8448]

😂😂😂

[@silentghost751]

You'll regret that

[@iandawe948]

Should just rename it the comedy channel and be done with it 🤣🤣🤣

[@jacobanderson1647]

@@silentghost751 Why's that?

[@toni4729]

@@silentghost751No he won't, why should he regret having a good at a fairytale. You've got to be kidding. All that money wasted. Wake up.

[@arcadeinvader8086]

If there are an estimated 6.5 million species of land animal, and every single one of which would have needed to be represented on the boat if they can't evolve (not that the mere few thousand years between noah's flood and the present would be enough time for that anyway), then there had to be about 13 million land animals present on the ark. To be fair, the very vast majority of these are invertebrates (The boat would be blanketed with millions of insects and spiders). Still, there are almost 30 thousand vertebrate species many of which would require substantially more care than the invertebrates. True, many of them (I don't know how many exactly) are aquatic creatures, but some of those are freshwater animals who can't live in saltwater. If the entire earth flooded the water would naturally be quite salty, so noah would need on his ark facilities for housing aquatic creatures. He'd also need to find a way that, say, a polar bear could live in the same area as a desert reptile such that one isn't overheating or freezing, without having refrigeration or heat lamps. Very few land plants could survive the sudden rush of water or being submerged for several days, so noah would need to take seeds or saplings of every species of land plant with him, as well as all aquatic plant species. Like the animals, many plant species die without a carefully controlled climate, so he'd need a way to do that, again without refrigeration or heat lamps. With all their hosts destroyed, billions of species of microbe would have gone extinct, so noah's passengers would need to carry them or they wouldn't be around today. So noahs gotta go everywhere on earth, including the americas, australia and antarctica (BEFORE he has a floating ark to get there), gather up millions of bugs and spiders, thousands of larger animals, locate and collect samples of almost half a million land plants, then put on his diving gear and get the freshwater plants and animals. Then he needs to find examples of every disease and parasite that his animals and family can suffer from and infect them with it. Then once the flood is over he's gotta spread all those plants and animals across 7 continents with the only means of getting them across the oceans now grounded, somehow keep the plants from just dying immediately in the saltwater-saturated earth, somehow keep the animals from just dying immediately since there's nothing but each other to eat, and then, and only then, can he finally.... ... try to expand his disease-stricken family on a planet that's almost entirely lifeless, unfarmable mud and undrinkable salty water. edit: 3 things I forgot: 1: fungus. Noah would also need to go collecting samples from all the various fungal species that would otherwise be destroyed like the plants. 2: All the rain and mixing of water would cause a huge drop in the ocean's overall temperature. Some sensitive saltwater aquatic species, like tropical fish, would also need to be kept on the ark to survive the sudden change in temperature and nutrient balance. I don't know if any shark or whale species would need to be brought on board. 3: he could potentially skip some of the plant species that would get killed by the flood, if they had seeds that were hardy enough to survive it. Of course, they would be spread all over the world so we would see these same plant species everywhere. I mean, assuming they didn't just die in the salty earth when it was over.

[@meehanasap]

Makes sense but Bible verison just seems far more plausible... 😜

[@spikenomoon]

He didn’t take fish. Air breathing animals. Insects don’t breath. Only 1400 different kinds. It is very plausible. Dinosaurs take a year from eggs. Only 5 kinds of dinosaurs. All breeds of dog come from Two dogs. Also more fresh water under the ocean than the amount of water in the ocean. Rivers of fresh water 10 times the Mississippi River.

[@nancydixon4843]

It was kinds not species, just 1700

[@hanikaram3351]

you have to read what Noah took first , and if there is a God you think he can not wipe everything and recreate any tree plant animal at any age they can be because if he is a perfect god then he can create a tree at 200 years old and another ar one year old

[@DeltaSteel]

So what you're saying that those 1700 kinds evolved into all the species that are around today?

[@gangoffour1]

Seriously, atheists love this!

[@iandawe948]

Even the flat earthers find these people comedy gold

[@jdmforever5583]

Most laugh at this😂

[@toni4729]

All the money, they've made out of this arc is amazing. Greedy sods.

[@briant6669]

@@toni4729 It loses money.

[@adrianagflores5587]

I find this like a train wreck that I simply can’t look away .

[@randolfmacdonaldstudies]

If creationists would invest and build an exhibit like this and stock it with real live animals as described and showed a family the size of Noah's family maintaining it, such an experiment would end all and win believers back into the faith around the world. Today

[@robkearns7630]

"Exit via the gift shop please" "We really need the cash"

[@danielmoose1273]

Lol(!!) ... good one 🙂 ...

[@jeanyan7738]

in 2006 and beyond, gospel-preaching prophets predicted DT would have 2 consecutive terms but second term would be stolen, he would be impeached, a plague would go worldwide, god would remove Roe, remove JB, and purge USA of corrupt leaders, all at once. tube serch trump.prophecies and kim.clement. God is removing many world leaders in 2022 - so far the prime minsters of India, Sri Lanka, UK, Italy, Pakistan, and ex-PM of Japan who was still very politically active. And more to go, like the PM of CN. When you see more fulfilled prophecy, you will call it a coincidence.

[@The_Gallowglass]

Ahahahaha when I saw the dinosaurs I lost my poop. The only dinosaurs that Noah could have on that ship were birds.

[@alantasman8273]

Dinos are birds...laughable....By the way. full sized dinos weren't needed on the Ark. God probably brought younger more fertile dinosaurs to repopulate the Earth.

[@The_Gallowglass]

@@alantasman8273 What is laughable about it? There were no "dinosaurs" during the time of Noah, except for avian descendants of dinosaurs. Have you ever seen a cassowary? Tell me that is not a dino. They have legs and feet like a raptor with a raptor claw.

[@Disciplekidsministry]

They had pairs of baby dinosaurs

[@The_Gallowglass]

@@Disciplekidsministry What were those dinosaurs called in the bible? Give me the Greek and Hebrew.

[@JCnumber1]

Read Job chapter 40 verses 15-24 and all of chapter 41. They are called “behemoth” and “leviathan”. Read the description. The term “dinosaur” wasn’t coined until 1841. It was another word for dragon.

[@bruhidk8998]

U guys r so brave! I would never admit on the internet that I didn’t go to elementary school

[@Asmokedetector]

Lol

[@robertraab]

Ignorance is a badge of honor to some. Supposedly, man's first sin was gaining knowledge.

[@Asmokedetector]

@@robertraab supposedly

[@adampower9757]

😂😂😂😂lol

[@timothyyoung4463]

LOL.... Haha.... Yet with ALL your education and wisdom that is the best comment you can muster..... yes friend I am laughing as well, keep it coming!

[@marthakrumboltz2710]

There are many instances of fact in the Bible which have little to do with whether you are Christian or not. Being a believer myself, I have realized nothing will make anyone believe what they have decided to reject -- especially when trying to back an atheist in to a corner. Hopefully at some point in time they will encounter that which is beyond condemnation and come home.

[@sids5002]

Only evidence will do that. You know, the stuff everyone needs and uses in literally every other area of their lives.

[@SCHOENINGB]

You realize the exact same thing applies to you? There is no evidence that is enough for Christian’s to stop believing something as crazy as a global flood.

[@stevenkinney2740]

Ahhhh the typical religious persons answer as to why intelligent adults do not believe this ark nonsense. Not that we have looked at the claims scientifically and can see, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the ark story has more holes in it than swiss cheese. No we have "decided to reject" the story. LOL Sorry....no one decides to reject a story. We are either convinced of the evidence or we are not. Period. I think what you meant to say is "christians have just decided to accept the story and ignore the overwhelming evidence against it."

[@DannyBoy21102110]

Ironic as the Judaism Islam Hinduism Buddhism Sikhism ect ect religions are all saying the same about you are the same as me my friend though just believe in one more religion than I do. Hopefully at some point in time you will encounter common sense and have free will!.

[@djarmstrong23]

How do I make myself believe something?

[@63phillip]

Ok so I have a question ? In order for a viable breeding population of a Animal including humans you would need the 2 of a kind to be greatly genetically dissimilar to each other in order for them to repopulate without inbreeding problems or genetic failure. They created the “50/500” rule, which suggested that a minimum population size of 50 was necessary to combat inbreeding and a minimum of 500 individuals was needed to reduce genetic drift. So my question is if Noah collected 2 of each animal species available to him in his area, assuming he didn't travel all over the world collecting species. Then how was he able to collect 2 of each animal from a area that have enough genetic diversity. Or was Noah a geneticist and did a DNA gene analysis on every individual animal.? And one more question. Who picked up all the poo ?

[@rinuvarghese8448]

It's a fairy tale bro I'm a Christian too but I don't believe.

[@rinuvarghese8448]

@@michiek8569 now don't argue with me about god and all. You can believe what ever you want. Peace ✌️

[@bigfellaoo7]

Also if any of the animals died.

[@michiek8569]

@@rinuvarghese8448 ✌️😀

[@SRose-vp6ew]

Actually, your forgetting that by looking at todays weaker genetics your missing the historic context. Yes, today we have weaker and not stronger genetics with massive issues due to how much breeding has been done to the point of lost information (example a shacky tea cup sized toy poodle or even humans who have race related (Christians call this tribe related as we are one human race) health issues and not the stronger ancestors that had more genetic diversity and a longer life span(genetic info is not added, but rather lost).

[@markderksen4130]

What did the lions eat after they let then off the ark? Did they keep feeding them dried meat so they didn't eat the 2 goats?

[@bobbyrice]

There were no lions yet. They evolved from the goat "kind"...and then moose kind...etc. It's really quite simple.

[@djarmstrong23]

@@bobbyrice seriously?

[@solideogloria...7421]

The bodies of drowned sinners..

[@jeanyan7738]

What did predators eat on the ark? In Eden all animals and man ate plants so when the flood came shortly after Eden, they were omnivores. This is why Noah was told to eat meat only after the flood, not during or before the flood.

[@jeanyan7738]

Noah's Ark Found: Underground imaging scans in 2019 PROVE Turkey's Durupinar Formation near Ararat is an ancient SHIP. Located at 6500 ft elevation near the largest anchor stones ever found, 3D scans revealed a preserved hull, internal compartments, bulkheads, uniform vertical ribs, and same Biblical specs (300 x 50 x 30 cubits with 3 decks). Partially petrified wood planks laminated together with organic cement, coated with bitumen, iron nails, and aluminum-titanium alloy rivets inserted into holes - similar to modern methods. Also contained fossilized animal dung, animal fur, and a single horn. Located on a mountain translated as "Doomsday Mountain" next to village historically called "Village of the Eight" (8 in Noah's family). . tube serch "noah ark evidence for location" and "noah ark in plain sight". The Durupinar site was previously dismissed as a natural formation decades ago but that was before the advent of the high tech. ultrasound scanning came along - this is why they went back to take another look since machine excavation would have ruined the site.

[@michaellindsey2031]

That's amazing! I never realized they had electric lights back then. The technology must've gotten lost somewhere along the way. And those shiny floors. To do that without a buffing machine, they must've been geniuses.

[@g0dl1k323]

let allone that it took them 3 times as long to rebuild the ark if you count years in manpower. while the had all kind of heavy machinery

[@austinporter6701]

All jokes aside this is the same age that all the ancient pyramids around the world were made obviously humans had harnessed some sort of technology that is supressed from us today

[@ryleighloughty3307]

I've never understood how cameramen in wars never get shot.

[@mightybean7840]

Let's not forget the plumbing needed for all those toilets and urinals. This had to have been the most important technology that was lost to mankind.

[@jennifershaw5302]

@@ryleighloughty3307 they do

[@karinthomas8365]

Karina gives so much information in such an engaging way. Makes me want to go back to the Ark for a third time and hear more of her in-person presentations in the auditorium or at the zoos.

[@diddsdaddiddsdad6865]

You’ve been there twice and you want a third🤦🤭. Are you a glutton for punishment. This will fry your brain 🤯.

[@lynnasche5147]

Karina certainly doesn’t have a grasp of paleontological science ! She’s formulating her own version…….totally disregarding the scientific method! She needs to actually engage with some knowledgeable paleontologists, not Ken who is sadly misinformed, but most likely will never see the actual truth of the scientific method as it has been exercised to give us a true picture of the geological eras and their fossil histories !

[@diddsdaddiddsdad6865]

@@lynnasche5147 It does make me wonder if these stories weren’t in the bible would they still be believed 🤷‍♂️. I doubt it but they go along with it to justify there bible.

[@Fight-t4b]

@@lynnasche5147 There's evidence of Noah's flood all around the world. Dinosaurs were killed because of a catastrophic flood and the fossil record and the earth's geology proves this.

[@allieoop2908]

​@@lynnasche5147 that is hilarious.... secular paleontology is philosophy, there are ZERO transitional fossils. Darwins theory is evil, racist and full of such gaping holes, you'd need masses of blind tust in fallible dishonest man, to believe it. The Biblical record of history is confirmed again and again by archeology, history, personal testimony.. The bible is full of fulfilled prophecy and prophecy not fulfilled yet. Judgement is coming, choose Jesus, He's your way to peace, joy, hope, life. Darwins theory is just that......guesswork, dont stake your eternity on flimsy ideas.

[@willyh.r.1216]

In my opinion, it's not about like or dislike, it creates confusion between myth and fact in people's mind. None can benefit from such confusion in long term.

[@kamion53]

I am afraid this confusion is created deliberately. Ken Ham and his team of AIG go out of their way to ridicule scientific news, by mostly only reading the headlines in the paper, but very seldom going into detail into the scientific publication itself, just to get the public mindset into Science =Bad, Bible= Good.

[@eijentwun5509]

What myth and fact? This really happened. I know YOU probably don't believe it, but it did. There is way way way way more evidence for this as opposed to the zero evidence for evolution of on kind of animal to another....not a single transitional skeleton has been found...and there should actually be More than Quadrillion times 10! because of ALL the supposed animals (which is all of them) which supposedly evolved. There are no transitional forms...but yet by a miracle we find one of our oldest "ancestors" Lucy.

[@kamion53]

@@eijentwun5509 I would waste my breath discussing this with someone so utterly in deline. Ken Han cum sui have made it their life convocation to deny anything not fitting in the Genesis myths. They never have come up with a good coherent theoretical fundation for their creationism and when they are busy arguing against aspect of evolution they need a wagonload of God juice to keep the wheels running. "Is not!, Is not! IS NOT!" is the way a child argues.

[@henryperez606]

I’m pretty sure everyone can make up their own mind about what’s true and not true.

[@eijentwun5509]

@@henryperez606 Actually we can't, not always..if that were true everyone would believe in God...because He is real and the Bible is true.

[@zerubbablestranger6970]

As an ex-atheist, I want to thank all of the skeptics that have commented here for proving the Bible true, again…. 2 Peter 3:3-6 (HCSB): 3 First, be aware of this: Scoffers will come in the last days to scoff, living according to their own desires, 4 saying, “Where is the promise of His coming? Ever since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they have been since the beginning of creation.” 5 They willfully ignore this: Long ago the heavens and the earth were brought about from water and through water by the word of God. 6 Through these waters the world of that time perished when it was flooded.

[@MrGamer-zv7xr]

that excerpt proves basically nothing.

[@dgeneric7518]

What do those words from that book prove?

[@doyouknoworjustbelieve6694]

BS. Why doesn’t she build an arch (according to one of the two contradictory stories in the Bible itself) fill it with two of the animals she could get and 8 people including herself then set sail for a year. A wooden ship cannot be that big. Also ships need regular maintenance. Sanitation on the ship will be a nightmare. I’m not even going to talk about the millions of species on earth, kangaroos and penguins, plants and insects.. or the fact that carnivores eat …MEAT, or the spread of disease or how will two of each kind repopulate the earth… Religion makes your mind believe abd justify BS, simply because you WANT to believe…. Damn!!!

[@kurtelliott1987]

So penguins rode in the pouches of kangaroos in order for them to get to Austrailia?

[@oliverduke1173]

You win the Darwin Award!

[@adirtyswarlos]

Christians and Jews believe the land was divided later and the land was originally on continent just like scientists do. We just disagree with the timeline.

[@PrometheusForever]

DNA bank according to Ancient Aliens. I call it well a miracle! Whether it be of the supernatural or the scientic sorcery it's still amazing.

[@troyevitt2437]

Checkmate, atheists!

[@ThankGodImAnAetheist]

Kangaroos aren't real. Neither are Platypuses. Source: I am Australian

[@StevaBlok]

I was a skeptic at first, but then I saw the dinosaurs and it all made sense.

[@cc3636tech]

What are you talking about?

[@222ableVelo]

I was skeptical about fish growing legs at first. But then I saw the artists renditions, and it all made sense.

[@chocolatemilkmaid6255]

Fish are fish and dinosaurs are dinosaurs- the definition of dinosaur is even in the video!

[@StevaBlok]

@@cc3636tech I don't think it's a coincidence the word God was mentioned 7 times in the movie Jurassic Park.

[@erikfacundo786]

you do know that Jorrasic park was a fiction book loosly based on dinosaur facts, many paleontologists have been vocal about the inaccuracies and they understand that the movies are for mainly entertainment purposes

[@adamdavis7663]

Next spring, my youngest son and I, are going on a civil war tour in Virginia. We're from Missouri. So we are definitely going stop on our way too see your musiem!! Very excited for this!!

[@Harldin]

The saddest thing about the Ark is all the species Noah Couldn't get on the Ark like Dragons, Minotaurs, Centaurs, Hydra's, Elves, Goblins, Ogres and of course the most beautiful of all Unicorns🦄. There where Cats and Rats and Elephants and Long neck Geese and Green Aligators but those naughty Unicorns kept playing in the rain. 🤣🤣

[@MaxPulse1]

🤣🤣

[@golfcartlipsyncing8567]

And don't forget the little insects god created whos sole purpose in life is to bore thru the eyes of children for food and nourishment..those horrible creatures. Noah saved them. I hope noah had some baby eye balls they could feed on for a year. LOL

[@SRose-vp6ew]

If you look on the Chines calendar all the animals are real, or do you not see the dragon as real? Why? It's not because of historic evidence but modern cartoons. In the same way you put out a pink haired unicorn when the descriptions through history are of a hairy rhino that we now know was real, but died out. Christian scientists believe animals go extinctic, I know you agree. But do we agree that the Bible has value as written history even if it goes against assumed secular teachings taught as fact when the secular teachings lack the evidence for what they claim? The word Dragon is an old word, the word Dinosaur is fewer than 200 years old. The word might be new, but the beast lived and seemed to have lived according to written history of every culture alongside humans. From Job 40- Ask yourself what beast eats plants, lives in a swamp, has a massive tree like tail, strong legs, and belly this strong? Most picture a long tailed and long necked dinosaur, this scripture is over 4000 years old, if you read the whole book it also talks about ice, remember this book is from the middle East, funny how it talks about ice in the land in supporting ice age history that others claim is never written about as others are allowed to PUSH and promote what they assume and refuse written history as fact and that's allowed and encouraged. Why? Because this is spiritual. Pray that God shows you the truth, you don't want to be wrong. “Look at Behemoth, which I made along with you and which feeds on grass like an ox. 16 What strength it has in its loins, what power in the muscles of its belly! 17 Its tail sways like a cedar; the sinews of its thighs are close-knit. 18 Its bones are tubes of bronze, its limbs like rods of iron. 19 It ranks first among the works of God, yet its Maker can approach it with his sword. 20 The hills bring it their produce, and all the wild animals play nearby. 21 Under the lotus plants it lies, hidden among the reeds in the marsh. 22 The lotuses conceal it in their shadow; the poplars by the stream surround it. 23 A raging river does not alarm it; it is secure, though the Jordan should surge against its mouth. 24 Can anyone capture it by the eyes, or trap it and pierce its nose?

[@golfcartlipsyncing8567]

@@SRose-vp6ew Easy. The archeological/geological records prove you wrong. I do not have to prove there never have been any fire breathing dragons years ago. That is the default position. If you claim there were, then you need to provide evidence and publish a paper to be reviewed by the experts in the field and if your evidence is testable, verifiable and repeatable then we will discuss dragons. Until then they are mythical. Lots of people say Aliens from other planets are real. More of them than people who claim dragons are real. That doesn't mean they are real. The time to believe it is when it has been demonstrated. Oh and we have no reason to believe anything your book says. That doesn't make anything true either.

[@Harldin]

"And pierced its NOSE" now I wonder why the ancient Storytellers would finish with that description. Now I wonder what animal has been described as a Behemoth and also has a very prominent proboscis. Lives in both Africa and Asia so would have been known to the people from where the bible fables come from. Do you need any help. ELEPHANTS

[@bolitho1999]

How did Noah travel to Australia to pick up Kangaroos and the other odd things about 4000 years before australia was discovered? Apparently after the flood he took them back home too.

[@MrGamer-zv7xr]

no its funnier. They think god sent them there which means that a koala, that sleeps 22 hours a day, has a max speed of about 8 kph, and only eats food exclusive to australia, without eating, would take a 80+ year journey through ocean to the arc, a year on the arc and 80+ years back, and an animal that lives like 15 years does this in creationist minds.

[@mikalehtonotko]

No no no. Those animals were in the middle east and after a while they desided to hop hop hop to Australia. Wonderfulllll story but true 😎😎😎

[@kevinfredericksen5108]

@@mikalehtonotko If Joe smith can ride a tapir, I'm sure that tapir can tread water a few days. It's that or get on the ark and become lion food.

[@alantasman8273]

All the animals came to Noah...most likely on a super continent that broke up after the flood.

[@terrlaw328]

Where there is a will there is a way…anything is possible in Ham Land.

[@catherinerosner970]

It's BIG, it's Beautiful so it must be REAL! I just LOVE how these poor, locked up animals lived in their close quarters for a YEAR. Couldn't do that today, but then most of us live in reality.

[@arthurcohen9390]

It’s truly amazing that not 1 animal passed away in the year they were on the so-called Ark. if one died that’s the end of their species. Couldn’t reproduce.

[@steveharrison3007]

No unicorns ...

[@kevinfredericksen5108]

@@steveharrison3007 ^^ this!

[@cloudwatcher724]

@@stysner4580 like..... being able to spell "actual"... correctly...??

[@simonejohnson-ramlakhan1724]

It was 7 pairs of clean animals made up the majority of animals on the Ark, but 1 pair of unclean animals.

[@redpoppy3569]

@@steveharrison3007 true but unicorns are mentioned in book of Job, I think.

[@CCC-V3]

"Different genetics and characteristics THAT WERE ALREADY PRESENT" Just because someone talks with confidence doesn't mean they know what they are talking about.

[@truewordz777]

Yes, like Richard Dawkins

[@tomfoolery1967]

Read Darwin’s Doubt.

[@eb60lp]

@@truewordz777 Richard Dawkins gives evidence for his claims. Sorry try again!

[@eb60lp]

@@tomfoolery1967 so the man had doubts. Thats how people with scientific understanding think unlike religious people especially Christian’s that values never having doubt about any particular topic.

[@SkyKingAzure]

That's literally everyone on earth at some point. And stop acting as if genetics/characteristics can't be dormant or hidden until an outside stimulus is felt. If you tried to turn on every single feature of your car at the same time, chances are it would stop working really fast, namely the accelerator and brakes, or even all the lights. There are reasons why those features have 'on/off' switches and valves. Same idea for DNA: If a dog that had both the short hair gene and the long haired gene moved to a colder climate, then the short-hair gene regressed. What else did the need - Larger nostrils because colder climates could also mean higher elevations. Thicker pads on their paws, and other things. So I must throw your last statement back at you. If you don't catch it, that's fine. You can train to catch things until your brain hardwires the new protocols - using the different genetics and characteristics that were already present.

[@63phillip]

I just can't help but think of all the massive trees that were cut down to make this Ark display replica.

[@blackcanaryable]

Don't worry. New trees can be planted and they will grow back. They ALWAYS do. God's creative power is AWESOME!

[@MotownModels]

@@blackcanaryable how do you know god made the trees?

[@golfcartlipsyncing8567]

Not to mention how a 600 year old man moved the trees to the building location? And how he can use untreated wood to build a boat? The story as more holes in it than swiss cheese. LOL

[@Generalindifference]

@@blackcanaryable 🤣🤣🤣 stop that's hilarious

[@63phillip]

@@blackcanaryable Yes but I bet the people who built that display didn't replant trees, and even if they did it would take many many years to get to the size of some of those beams I see that were used to build the Ark.

[@DiscoverWithDeLo]

So what happened to all the fish when the freshwater and saltwater mixed and it became brackish, either too saline or not saline enough for most aquatic organisms?

[@AverageGuy6969]

Stop trying to make sense of this nonsense. They don't want to answer your legit questions, they just want your money!

[@aldousbangbang2816]

The freshwater from the rain remained on top of the denser saltwater, creating a layer where some fish could survive.

[@Fullyautomagic]

Theists don't like this part: It's fiction

[@MrCanis4]

ooo i love it it's so funny.

[@Sanctifying]

🗿

[@silentghost751]

Atheists don't like this part: It's real

[@MrCanis4]

@@silentghost751 I like it. Good comedy.

[@Gamer_G33k]

@@silentghost751 The book is real I guess. I can touch it, flip the pages, and read the words. But no, very few things in the bible actually happened. No doubt there was some farmer who had a big enough boat to keep his family and livestock safe during a small local flood, and maybe there was a carpenter Jewish rabbi named Joshua that was persecuted for his ideas, and maybe there was a man named Heracles that actually killed a lion and the story was exaggerated to make the lions pelt made out of iron, and maybe the fish was THIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIS big.

[@jamesmeyer1325]

Just because you don't subscribe to this myth (or any other or these beliefs) that does not make you an atheist.

[@diddsdaddiddsdad6865]

I’m always saying to the religious believe what ever rocks your boat ( see what I done there) .but the myths are so unbelievably unrealistic to be true. You right there are Christian’s that think the flood myth is there as a moral message. This is the thing with religion. There are so many interpretations. They can’t all be right but can all be wrong

[@NeilMalthus]

Don't be ashamed about being an atheist / antitheist, James (should you be one). It's about whether you have self-respect or not. And whether you appreciate capitalists basing society on fairy fucking tales or not. Remember, after all, there is zero logic in 'god', 'heaven' and 'hell'. None whatsoever.

[@asasdsaasda]

@@foolonthrn You can take your own advice here bud, all they find are some rocks which they baseless claim its 'the ark', delusional at best

[@silentghost751]

No myth

[@silentghost751]

@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 what's your standard of unrealistic

[@davida3283]

I love how empty the place is and the void of relevance it has brought to the town that it promised to swarm with tourist. Definitively a place to go if you want to witness big blunders

[@davida3283]

@@Safetyman99 yes and sure we learn! Mistakes can be teach things , and Big mistakes can be master teachers 😊

[@SRose-vp6ew]

That's assuming, they have had millions and millions of visitors from scientists and families around the world. May God bless you with truth and wisdom. "Humble yourselves before the Lord, and He will lift you up." From James 4. God loves you, he has a plan for you, and you have the full freedom to reject it.

[@davida3283]

@@SRose-vp6ew yes of course, for centuries ago the first step of academic research is visit Noah Ark replica located in Kentuky from 9 to 20pm , only $ 99.95 per adult, kids free, no discount for scientist 😭

[@carolynnmarkiewicz6015]

Spoken like one who never made it on the ark.

[@denicesanders4586]

20pm?

[@nathaniel5911]

Imagine thinking two of any animal could repopulate an entire planet.

[@jefferygoldthorpe919]

As long as it is a young male and female why not? I assume you have a number of objections but I won't assume what they are.

[@jerusalem330]

Yeah. Why not?

[@jimmiewomble416]

Inbreeding. A population restarted from two animals have a genetic pool full of mutations. But, but, God may be an answer to all of you whose tv only played the tv evangelicals while you were growing up. But for those of us who grew up with the Discovery Channel, learned real science in school, not an answer.

[@bpljlb]

@@jefferygoldthorpe919 the only objection you need is we now with science would be able to tell all animals came from inbreeding. Every single test of ANY animal would show the same results...but what do you know!!! Nothing.... If you are interested look at the cheetah and how we know they were almost extinct

[@bpljlb]

@@jerusalem330 science, that's why

[@susoku5615]

"history began from when it was recorded" the absolute hubris and massive stupidity one has to posess to be able to form such a sentence ..... wow

[@wordsoffire2416]

Tell us.. What happened before the big bang? ... it's scientifically impossible for something to come from nothing. Photons, DNA, neutrons, gases etc... it MUST have a creator. Creation doesn't come from NOTHING.

[@robertzeurunkl8401]

Well, technically, that is correct. "History" is a written account of "what happened". Someone has to write it for it to become "history." Do you mean that "human existence began when it was recorded?" Because that would in fact be incorrect. But "history begins only when someone writes it down" is factually correct. If it's not written down, it's not history. Seems pretty simple to me.

[@christophercartlidge5466]

@@robertzeurunkl8401 I did a very large poo, wrote about it… Does that make my poo history???

[@robertzeurunkl8401]

​@@christophercartlidge5466 Well, for you, yes. You will be able to go back and read it any time you want to recall your experience. I don't think you will get much traction out of the larger historical community with it though. just sayin' ;-) 😉😉

[@robertzeurunkl8401]

@Just me I totally agree with oral history. Didn't think I would have to be specific about HOW it's recorded, but it does have to be recorded. Also, anything "pieced together" through any means at all other than direct communication is technically not "history". "History" is specifically an account. A recording. A transmission from one person to the next. THAT is history. "Piecing something together" is by definition NOT history. It is deduction at best, and speculation at worst. But it is not "history" because it cannot be. I'm getting the distinct feeling that I am dealing with a lot of people here who have no idea what "history" actually means.

[@kilroy2517]

Hmm, very interesting thank you. So Noah took 1400 different kinds of animals, and thanks to him today we have over 11,000 different kinds of birds on our planet. It almost sounds as if the animals that survived the flood gradually became the wide variety of animal we have today. I think that's called speciation. And here I thought that you guys didn't believed in evolution, yet you're happily providing evidence for it. Thanks!

[@rickojay7536]

No they believe it alright, evolution on steroids😂😂😂 Evolving from 1400 to over 10 mill in just 4000 years Comedy gold

[@shannonmicete7020]

Just like in the last 100 years, we have gotten more types of dogs breeds than before.

[@rickojay7536]

@@shannonmicete7020 buddy do you grasp the basic concept of speciation? Do you even know what a species is ?

[@kilroy2517]

​@@shannonmicete7020 Oh my, here we go. Dog breeds are exactly that, breeds. Taxonomically they are considered "varieties" of the species commonly called "dog". They are not new species, they are new varieties of the same species. One of the simplest tests is whether two animals can mate and produce offspring - if they can they are the same species, if not, they aren't. There are a couple of exceptions, for example, a horse and donkey can produce a mule or a hinny, but in both cases, the offspring of the interspecies-breeding is sterile.

[@PrivatePeterson]

Christians believe in micro evolution, not macro evolution. Change of species, not change of kinds (i.e. ape to human).

[@airmark02]

The *Dinosaur* explanation is so convincing I am speechless ...

[@hoppyandhisholidayhelpers1714]

it makes perfect sense that only the baby dinosaurs would fit onto the arc

[@airmark02]

@@hoppyandhisholidayhelpers1714 Yes, those old video clips of Jesus galloping into Bethlehem on the back of a stegosaurus has always been the proof enough I guess...

[@hoppyandhisholidayhelpers1714]

@@airmark02 I was taught that Jesus rode in on a T-Rex and had an M-16, and a light saber. but I was raised reformed, not fundamentalist.

[@airmark02]

@@hoppyandhisholidayhelpers1714 So it was his side kick Susie the Hedgehog who rode the Stegosaurus?..

[@hoppyandhisholidayhelpers1714]

@@airmark02 anything is possible on this Ark. I think that even PT Barnum would find the concept of 'dinosaurs on Noah's Ark' to be too profane to make a profit on.

[@weidnermusic]

It's not really that atheist in particular won't like any of that video, it's just like anyone with a functional brain will pause before 3 mn and go "enough youtube for today".

[@sparkswyvernionmimidrac8805]

Here's some big questions, 1.Who will the animals offsprings mate with? 2. What did the koalas eat, because they only eat eucalyptus leaves which are found in adjacent areas of New Guinea, Australia, and Indonesia NOT IN THE MIDDLE EAST!!!!!! 3. you said 2 of every animal, should that include insects as well? 4. if dinosaurs were on the ark and made it to land the large carnivores would of over hunted the smaller mammalian carnivores and herbivores because like all predators THEY GO FOR THE SMALL AND WEAK!!!! If a T.rex had to choose between a Stegosaurus and elephant it would go for the elephant.

[@mindtraveller100]

You´re losing your time. These people won´t even understand your questions, how do you expect them to have answers?

[@alantasman8273]

Thanks for the very easy questions... 1: Offspring's mated with siblings of course. 2: Animals eat all kinds of foods indigenous to the areas they settle in. This has been found consistently throughout nature. 3: Insects are not animals per se. They would have easily ridden on the vegetation floating on the water after the deluge. Certainly some insects may have made it on the Ark after all, many flying insects can intrude into structures. insects would have probably also been in the feed-stock eaten by the animals. They would probably been consumed by birds in the Ark. 4:Because dinosaurs have canine teeth, it does not prove that they were just meat eaters...check out the word omnivore....Mankind has teeth with incisors but can eat vegetables, nuts and fruits, eggs without needing to eat meat. By the way, dinosaur (or dragons as they were called in the Bible) soft tissue has now been found on five continents...dinosaurs did not live 65+ million years ago but were contemporaries of man...as side by side dino and human footprints have been found. In addition to Peruvian Ica Burial Stones found in the thousands that depict man and dinosaurs together. Also check out the tens of thousands of Acambra Mexico Figurines depicting dinosaurs long before the modern era. The building of the Ark was facilitated by God who brought the animals to the Ark and it is said in the scriptures that God sealed the door of the Ark. God loves his creation but man corrupted it. But being a loving God, He gave us a second chance through Noah's offspring. By the way, check out the book Traced by Dr Nathan Jeanson who has genetically traced man's history back to Noah's children. Hope this helped...peace.

[@yoyit2Dan]

the mating pool thing can be seen with modern day invasive species. for example, in Alaska there is "rat island". all it took is an exploration ship to introduce a few rats accidentally and now you have an island infested with rats. same with black squirrels in North America and many many more examples. from a biblical standpoint, the animals on the ark would have had a more "pure" genetic code as they were closer to creation. in breading would have been less of a concern.

[@KingAries85]

I’m more impressed how every human but Noah’s family died in the flood and some how they where building city after city with all the people that didn’t exist anymore

[@yoyit2Dan]

Noah could have very well raised the animals in captivity for a a period of time after the ark landed, in order to increase population size before release. again, some of the smaller animal types reproduce much faster than the larger carnivores. its not much different than modern day ecosystems, just scaled down.

[@monkkeygawd]

“The first thing to realize...is that most people go through life with a whole world of beliefs that have no sort of rational justification, and that one man’s world of beliefs is apt to be incompatible with another man’s, so that they cannot both be right. People’s opinions are mainly designed to make them feel comfortable; truth, for most people is a secondary consideration.” ― Bertrand Russell

[@toxicatedmemes3529]

Jesus is the truth

[@toxicatedmemes3529]

Truth is objective. There is no such this as “my truth.” Only the actual truth

[@alissagonzales735]

As my father used to say. Your truth might be my lie and your lie might be my truth.

[@monkkeygawd]

@@toxicatedmemes3529 it's questionable whether Jesus even existed (see, for example, Dr. Richard Carrier'speer reviewed book, On the Historicity of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason for Doubt"), and, if he did exist, his life has obviously been dramatically embellished to the point of absurdity. But...If believing in that myth helps make someone act in a positive, giving and accepting way towards others and helps u feel inner peace, though, then that is great. And, I sincerely wish u the best.

[@steveg1961]

@@toxicatedmemes3529 You wrote, "Truth is objective. There is no such this as 'my truth.' Only the actual truth." I think that's going too far. What matters is CONTEXT. For example, "my truth" is that chocolate ice cream is the best ice cream. That is the truth, but it's "my truth," not the truth for everyone. That's just the context. However, where I agree with you completely is that when the context has to do with claims about reality, and not just our personal subjectivity, then "the truth" is determined not by our claims, not our beliefs, not our desires, not our wishes, but is determined solely by reality itself - which we can only find out about by examining, studying, and analyzing the real world itself.

[@RTD553]

I'm a salamander. I really don't want to live in the dark in a small earthenware pot for a year, thank you. I have a very strong suspicion it will kill me.

[@CravingBeer]

I've got a pet newt. I call him Tiny, since he's my newt.

[@RTD553]

@@CravingBeer It took me a worryingly long time to get that joke. But then again, I'm a salamander and can barely read.

[@thefanficdinosaur7621]

@@RTD553 I’m a gay dinosaur. My friends call me Megasoreass.

[@RTD553]

@@thefanficdinosaur7621 I'm sure there's a flag for you and a march to go on.

[@jeanyan7738]

What about plants after the flood? Seeds are known to drift in the ocean for years until they land on fertile soil and sprout. A bird brought a fresh leaf to Noah after the ark landed, showing how fast foliage can grow, providing food for the animals who disembarked the ark. Also, many animals can go months without food.

[@shirleybradshaw1288]

Salt water isn't good for them .

[@jeanyan7738]

@@shirleybradshaw1288 MODERN seeds are proven to survive FOR YEARS in the open ocean. YEARS.

[@robertzeurunkl8401]

Great presentation. Your zoologist/keeper is really knowlegable. I have to ask, though, when you are describing all the detail in the animal enclosures, the excretion pans that have to be emptied, all the food that has to be fed.... how could just 8 people do all that work? Did you say 6,800 pairs or collections of animals? How many animals could YOU feed in a single day?

[@robertzeurunkl8401]

edit: 6800 total animals. It's all I can do to manage feeding my FIVE dogs. lol. ;-)

[@tomjones3013]

@@robertzeurunkl8401 shush! these ppl don't like facts.

[@eijentwun5509]

Remember... these people had NOTHING to do ALL DAY for months....Neither did the animals waste energy running, walking, Hunting, Fighting.... so less food required....AND the Food back then was MUCH MUCH MUCH more nourishing, Pure, Organic etc. They could take care of it.

[@Fluffykeith]

@@eijentwun5509 Assuming it takes 10 seconds to feed each animal, each of those 8 people would have to be working NON STOP for 23.6 hours every day, to feed that many animals. ITS NOT POSSIBLE

[@AlexAlex-ij3mz]

@@Fluffykeith How do you know there were so many variations of animals since then? Perhaps there were few variations of different animals that over time evolved into more types after.

[@fernandogallardo3458]

God is able to feed and watered all the animals inside the ark. God is also able to keep all the animals alive without food or water. Jesus fed 5,000 people with a few fishes. People think the hand of the Lord is short that He cannot save.

[@fernandogallardo3458]

@Mel Dummar, if you don't believe in the word of God, no need to have a discussion. For it is written: "he that is of God beareth God's words: you therefore hear them not, because you are not of God." [ John 8:47 ]. In other words, if you are not of God, you cannot hear God's words. For it is written: faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. [ Romans 10:17 ]. When the devil tempted Jesus, he said, if you be the Son of God, command that these stones be made bread. But Jesus answered and said, it is written, man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God. [ Matthew 4:3-4 ]. When the devil, or when an unbeliever tempts the children of God, and say, how do you know that Jesus fed 5,000 people with a few fish. We answered and say, it is written, Jesus took the five loaves, and the two fishes, and looking up to heaven, he blessed, and brake, and gave the loaves to his disciples, and the disciples to the multitude. And they were about 5,000 men, beside women and children. [ Matthew 14:17-21 ]. How do you know that Jesus is the Son of God? IT IS WRITTEN

[@rickojay7536]

Magic... Ok got it

[@fernandogallardo3458]

@@rickojay7536, the natural man receive it not the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, nor can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. ( 1 Corinthians 2:14 ) The fool has said in his heart, there is no God. ( Psalm 14:1 )

[@oreally8605]

@Ricko jay No, sadly, you may never get it..

[@benscrwbiutb9800]

@@rickojay7536 he must be talking about brainwashed when he says you’ll never get it

[@Roserytemptation]

You’re gonna have to try a lot harder to convince me. My mind is struggling to understand that people like this actually exist in the world …

[@jasonloy33]

No one needs to convince you. You have to believe by faith. The bible says there will be many who will reject His words and be condemned forever, and the Bible is so true about that.

[@eijentwun5509]

My mind is struggling How evidence keeps being found in abundance for the evidence that the Bible is true while ZERO actually exists for Transitional forms and yet you believe that.

[@Roserytemptation]

@@jasonloy33 "his words" ... Does it not seem strange to you that a being that is not human somehow has a gender and that gender is the same as the people who wrote it? And the religion itself seems to favour men also. The Bible says a lot of things. It's full of contradictions and scientific inaccuracies so to believe it by pure faith is (and this sounds incredibly harsh but) delusional.

[@mobilegamereviewer.1936]

@@eijentwun5509 that's a lie. Clearly you don't want to learn about evolution and are trapped in your eco chamber.

[@desmodus5635]

@@jasonloy33 (snicker, snicker!)

[@debbiestarman4485]

So, in order to answer our question about how they could fit all the animals on the ark, they say "oh, this bear is indicative of ALL bears." Well in that case, if God created all species, he finished after the flood was over with all the rest of the bears? I think they should have left this part out. Also, didn't these animals mate during the year they were on the ship? That would make a LOT of rabbits.

[@YasminGLife]

Where is this located??? I WANNA GO!!!

[@theBolderBoulder]

In Kentucky

[@randyg.7940]

At my place!!! You're welcome here anytime

[@iamwtl]

I used to think that, but not anymore. The more I research the Bible, the more I am discovering that it actually could be true.

[@chucklesdarwinwaswrongevol236]

@@canbest7668 you don’t think the Creator of the Universe could make an animal talk, yet evolution says over billions of years a rock eventually was able to make itself into a human, who can talk.

[@a.d.marshall2748]

@@canbest7668 1. The ark encounter isn't what's in the Bible. 2. Many died rather than change their eyewitness testimony of Christ's resurrection. And that fact is only one proof. 3. I bet what things you believe are far more absurd and unfounded than any miracles performed by God.

[@the9657]

I’m so proud of Noah hunting down polar bears and Nile crocodiles to cram onto the ark

[@lloydmunga4961]

@The why would they bring marine life on the boat? It was for land animals or else God would have told him to build a floating aquarium . The active word in polar bear is "bear" . Just like grizzly " bear " .brown " bear" . Any rudimentary knowledge of genetics refutes what you're saying . It takes MORE faith to believe a frog turned into a human than to have faith that a guy built a boat . Which has been documented all over the world . China is one of the oldest civilizations still existing . It's writing is one of the oldest in existence . Older than Egypt. It's old.old old old . And there writing characters are based on that flood story . You'd have to be out to lunch to call a frog your ancestor . And the missing link doesn't exist . There is no missing link. And skeletal remains that old are hodge podged from different findings. Hell , they used bits of bone to reconstruct skulls . A FrankenLucy . They conveniently keep that part of their theory out of their faith based " theory of evolution " The operative word being theory . Because that's all that it is . A theory . Darwin was smart enough to be able to recognize adaptation with minor mutations. But he wasn't smart enough to reslize You can't mutate a living organism that way and expect it to live and thrive. No matter how long it took . That crazy stuff only happens in movies like the FLY or altered states . That leap of faith makes a bible thumper's faith look sane and normal comparatively

[@jefferygoldthorpe919]

According to scripture God brought the animals to Noah.

[@jefferygoldthorpe919]

@Slavery is Freedom, War is Peace Actually there are cave paintings in India which could be representative of kangaroos. The explanation is that kangaroos and the like migrated from the ark to a location where they could eventually thrive. Only the population in Australia survived. All other populations died out. The first two kangaroos didn't hop all the way to Australia. More likely it was a group of their descendants several hundred years later.

[@jefferygoldthorpe919]

@Slavery is Freedom, War is Peace Fossils require a catastrophic burial event to form, therefore fossils of kangaroos might not form. Why would it take thousands of years to migrate that far? Populations under pressure often move much faster. The Chinese have written records going back to about 1250 BC, which is only 3250 years ago, not 5000. The Australian aboriginals have no artifacts of any kind which can be reliably dated, using either luminescence dating or carbon dating. Even then scholars disagree, some putting it as recently as 10,000 years and others going as far to say 70,000 years. Carbon dating does not take the flood into account. This would have buried most of the available carbon effectively resetting the C14/12 clock. By the way did you know that the person who invented carbon dating assumed that the amount of C14 in the atmosphere was stable? New measurements prove it isn't.

[@bboennemann]

How did saltwater fish survive in the less saline water for however long this flood lasted? And how about fresh water fish the other way around?

[@Tris444_]

Saltwater fish went deeper and fresh water fish swam near the surface... or so says Jebediah!

[@DheloneZone259]

Or it didn’t happen

[@joewalker9032]

@@DheloneZone259 this

[@jeanyan7738]

Noah's Ark Found: Underground imaging scans in 2019 PROVE Turkey's Durupinar Formation near Ararat is an ancient SHIP. Located at 6500 ft elevation near the largest anchor stones ever found, 3D scans revealed a preserved hull, internal compartments, bulkheads, uniform vertical ribs, and same Biblical specs (300 x 50 x 30 cubits with 3 decks). Partially petrified wood planks laminated together with organic cement, coated with bitumen, iron nails, and aluminum-titanium alloy rivets inserted into holes - similar to modern methods. Also contained fossilized animal dung, animal fur, and a single horn. Located on a mountain translated as "Doomsday Mountain" next to village historically called "Village of the Eight" (8 in Noah's family). . tube serch "noah ark evidence for location" and "noah ark in plain sight". The Durupinar site was previously dismissed as a natural formation decades ago but that was before the advent of the high tech. ultrasound scanning came along - this is why they went back to take another look since machine excavation would have ruined the site.

[@bboennemann]

@@jeanyan7738 Wow! Amazing!.... 🤣

[@bobvanwest]

Can you explain the Noah story was plagerized from "The Epic of Gilgemesh" written 1,800 years prior to Noah?

[@briedubbels8690]

Proof?

[@ewtay]

The fact that so many people in the comment section challenge the video with scientific knowledge and logic thinking actually prove we still have hopes to survive as a species in this harsh universe! 👍👍

[@diddsdaddiddsdad6865]

The religious will try all the tactics to justify the myth’s that are in the bible. Even bringing in a creationist zoo keeper 🤪

[@ThankGodImAnAetheist]

You're an optimist. I like that.

[@jeanyan7738]

yes, xtians are so foolish, that's why the real Noah's Ark has been found: Underground imaging scans in 2019 PROVE Turkey's Durupinar Formation near Ararat is an ancient SHIP. Located at 6500 ft elevation near the largest anchor stones ever found, 3D scans revealed a preserved hull, internal compartments, bulkheads, uniform vertical ribs, and same Biblical specs (300 x 50 x 30 cubits with 3 decks). Partially petrified wood planks laminated together with organic cement, coated with bitumen, iron nails, and aluminum-titanium alloy rivets inserted into holes - similar to modern methods. Also contained fossilized animal dung, animal fur, and a single horn. Located on a mountain translated as "Doomsday Mountain" next to village historically called "Village of the Eight" (8 in Noah's family). . tube serch "noah ark evidence for location" and "noah ark in plain sight". The Durupinar site was previously dismissed as a natural formation decades ago but that was before the advent of the high tech. ultrasound scanning came along - this is why they went back to take another look since machine excavation would have ruined the site.

[@erics320]

What did the carnivoors eat after stepping of the ark? They could not eat any other animals until they had multiplied or that species would be extinct.

[@jesuslovesyou-matts]

They explain that at 8:25

[@johnlane1206]

for that matter what did the vegetarians eat , after all no plant life would have survived the flood as described in the bible.

[@justamason6869]

After the flood, some clean animals were needed for making sacrifices and for food. To ensure their survival, it was necessary to have more than one pair of each kind in the ark....thst is why some were for eating

[@davidv6588]

@@jesuslovesyou-matts No they don't. They attempt to but fail miserably.

[@katingriselli9318]

Who says they didn’t multiply in the arc? I feel like being on the arc for so long, with 2 of every kind of animal, there would’ve been lots of reproducing. By the time the arc settled on the dry land, there should’ve been plenty to go around (whether it be the initial 2 animals or their offspring) I could be way wrong. Definitely a question I have for God when I stand face to face with him.

[@RiordanJohn]

And dear zookeeper, while you’re at it, can you break down and describe how Santa hits all those households in a 24-hour period?

[@RiordanJohn]

BTW, the word “kind” is used in a nonsensical fashion at this “museum”.

[@brucenassar9077]

lots of coffee

[@jensockelmann1458]

Noah must have had a really first class builders merchant nearby! I especially love the 3000 years old steel reinforcement plates.

[@nathanwilson3081]

Not sure why Jesus couldn't help, he was a "Master" carpenter who couldn't produce a single birdhouse or toothpick, so masterfull

[@jeanyan7738]

At 6500 ft elevation in Turkey, they are 3D scanning the ark which show conventioal structure. Minor excavations have dug up nails, rivets, fossilized animal dung, fur, a horn. KZbin search 3D ark scans.

[@jeanyan7738]

they found original ark - metal nails, rivets, bulkhead, ribs, and upon shallow excavation they found animal fur, fossil dung, and a horn. tube serch 3D ark scans

[@diddsdaddiddsdad6865]

You forgot the manual pumps that had to pump the water out because it wouldn’t have been water tight.🤪

[@bpljlb]

@@jeanyan7738 lol shhh Jean just shhhhh

[@SuperNictastic]

Presumably the ark had zonal temperature zones you know to make sure that cold climate animals were kept separate from desert animals. Just wondering how that was done? How do you get different temperature zones in the same wooden ship?

[@ellenl.5581]

I don't think there were that many zones until Pelegs day when the earth split into continents.

[@SuperNictastic]

@@1godonlyone119 Hahahahah. Comedy gold. Every answer I get on here just reaffirms that you are all making this up as you go along.

[@SuperNictastic]

@@1godonlyone119 look these are all just middle Eastern stories made up over generations to try and explain things they just didn't understand . Anyone taking these stories as literal fact is a fucking moron or American. Same thing.

[@1godonlyone119]

You are not a serious thinker, sir.

[@facetiouslyinsolent8313]

That's a great question Nick, somehow I'm sure they have a magical explanation that couldn't possibly be proven.

[@neutralbychoice3584]

Why would Atheists not like this video??? That girl is really informative about animals and clearly knows her stuff. Even the stuff about the Ark is cool. Believe it or not but many Atheists, me included love the Bible. Its a great fantasy book with a lot of philosophy stuff.

[@briant6669]

All the philosophy in Psalms and Proverbs is really just repackaged greek philosophy. Funny how the atheists are the only ones reading that book.

[@jeanyan7738]

the real ark is even better - tube serch "noah ark evidence for location" and "noah ark in plain sight"

[@mattestudios]

Because atheists usually just laugh and say there is no way this could possibly work and are very dismissive. When science is applied, it takes their argument away.

[@jeanyan7738]

@@mattestudios yes, which means its not the lack of evidence; its the lack of desire to know god's truths - prayer is the weapon against this godless world. But many true seekers look at the comments without replying so keep posting truths for them.

[@neutralbychoice3584]

@@mattestudios Of cause it could have happened. It even might have happened, but the thing is that Atheists cant go on blind faith.

[@AD-cy7wx]

The fact that it’s 2022 and people STILL believe that THEIR religious mythology is truth and everyone else’s are wrong blows my mind. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️ ALL human constructs. Literally thousands of religions have come and gone.

[@ryanranard5187]

Jesus Christ is our god

[@jkoblivion4175]

@@ryanranard5187 your God. I'm no slave.

[@AD-cy7wx]

@@ryanranard5187 prove it. Oh right… you can’t. 🙄

[@ryanranard5187]

@@AD-cy7wx Humor me and check out Hugh Ross. He’s a astrophysicist who connects SCIENCE with the God of the Bible. He’s extremely smart. I too look for evidence and this guy fascinates me. At least take a look.

[@AD-cy7wx]

@@ryanranard5187 I did… he lost me At “ufo sightings are interdimensional beings created by God…” ;) But he’s still basing his theories on a 2000+ year old hand me down book which is proven to have many flaws… there’s no more proof the Bible is real than the Quran or the book of Mormons. 🤷‍♂️

[@dorothygarriott9721]

Very interesting. Had to turn my volume up quite a bit (90%) to hear what was being said. However, I'm glad I did.

[@billguyan1913]

"How did penguins get from Antartica to the Ark" - similarly how did kangaroos get from Australia... In the antedeluviasn world there was no Australia or Antartica - "the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished" - 2 Peter 3:6. Moreover, the polar regions in the antedeluvian world were temperate, neither was it covered by vast oceans as now (which are really the waters of the Flood).

[@alicemartinez6552]

B 4 the ark was built... we do not know what the world was like. Your questions make sense but we are using logic to try to understand something supernatural.

[@billguyan1913]

@@alicemartinez6552 I don't know what you mean by "supernatural" in this context. The Flood was a real physical event which changed the geography of the Earth and its climate forever. We are not given a lot of direct information about the antedeluvian world but there are lots of inferences.

[@alicemartinez6552]

@@billguyan1913 Just saying the Lord needed to be involved helping Noah and his family get all the animals on board... controlling them to move in the direction, wild animals, tiny animals, birds needed to fly, or walk all the way into their proper cage ... think about it. this was tremendous...

[@billguyan1913]

@@alicemartinez6552 OK, I understand oyu better now. Yes, of course God had to be involved, yes He caused the migration of the animals. God was behind the whole colossal event. I was just saying that the Flood changed this world forever, in case you were allegorising. (ie "spiritualising") the Genesis narrative as so many do

[@alicemartinez6552]

@@billguyan1913 Gotcha !

[@rickelliott3683]

Very interesting, a completely creative approach to explain a mythological fantasy.

[@claytonsavage7515]

This reinforces one of my midevel theories. There is believed to be a Dinosaur that was on all 4s had wings and would breath phosperous and in the very humid england the phospherous would catch fire so it appeared to breath fire. The Knight's of the table round killed the last of the dinosaurs. Pretty interesting idea.

[@MrRourk]

Warsaw Poland used to have one of those as well

[@changez3336]

Sounds more like a dragon lol

[@oak4901]

phosphorous does not burn in water, just oxygen. The Kimodo "dragon" a large monitor lizard (man killer) has a long red flickering tongue that seems to be fire coming from its mouth. .Possible origin of the Dragon myth....

[@A_Realist]

Dragons were actually out before they made the Dinosaur up. Not saying either we’re real but if I had to pick it would be the Dragon

[@RyderWestwood]

There were "dragons", yes. And there are still dinosaurs most likely still alive if the legend of Loch Ness has any truth to it.

[@paulross6727]

P.S. Atheists love this, it's so easy to disprove. A few years ago they put in an insurance claim against rain damage. The irony was lost on Ken. Lol!

[@jeanyan7738]

how can you disprove it if they already found it? tube serch 3D ark scans

[@rickojay7536]

2 of each kind argument is comedy gold 😂😂

[@tened8530]

Why is that ? You do get poodles from wolfs lol

[@rickojay7536]

@@tened8530 not in 3000 years you dont Also that is called evolution funny how you cant seem to run away from it

[@tened8530]

@@rickojay7536 I don’t get what you mean by 3000 years it took a lot less than that to get poodles lol

[@Mike_Wilson_KJV]

@@tened8530 Don't waste your time trying to have a Logical discussion with atheists; they believe life came from rocks. LOL

[@samhavoc1066]

I find it hilarious when someone tries to present stories from the bible like its fact, no matter how ludicrous it is.

[@NEMES1-S]

I find it hilarious when atheists try to present their theories as proven facts.

[@tomfoolery1967]

It’s not ludicrous at all. Take the position for yourself for a moment that God does exist and he has given us his word in the Bible, okay? If that’s true then how hard a feat would it be for him to orchestrate the creatures he wanted to save going to the ark and behaving themselves? If God created the entire universe to show his power and for his glory, the Ark is a small thing. But to us many things are ludicrous. If we couldn’t see the Pyramids today we would find stories of them ludicrous. If we didn’t find dinosaur bones we would find stories of giant creatures ludicrous, and we still do actually. People find the moon landing ludicrous. So it’s easy to claim that something sounds ludicrous and just blow it off. It’s another thing entirely to approach something with the kind set of let’s see if it’s true and seek God with an open heart. It’s way easier to just toss it aside and ignore the truth though.

[@terryavery9918]

@@NEMES1-S Try to explain away all these 10 items that actually exist right where the Scriptures tell us they should be, found in archeology and history proving the Scriptures are true and real... Noah’s Ark location found Walls of Jericho location found Sodom and Gomorrah location found Red Sea crossing location found Rock that was split in two by Moses location found Mount Sanai location found Crucifixion site - Golgotha (place of the skull) location found Blood found at the site and tested to be very rare and more Shroud or Sudarium of Oviedo (cloth wrapped around the head at death) Shroud of Turin (cloth wrapped around the body in the tomb) has been found to be scientifically accurate Tomb of the Mashiah location found Now, if these are not enough for you, is there need to start listing the other over 100 items not mentioned? Hilarious, isn't it?

[@DivineLightPaladin]

@@tomfoolery1967 the moon is hollow. It rings when struck. Is that mentioned in the Bible? Is the moon mentioned at all?

[@TheGordohhh]

@@tomfoolery1967 I have this quality that’s called common sense!. So I will therefore pass on your silly request!

[@xavieryates9782]

The ‘Ark’ is an absolute impossibility! It just shows how gullible some people are!

[@sigmaoctantis1892]

"Atheists Do NOT Like This Part of Noah’s Ark" Indicating that there are other parts that atheists do like. I particularly like that EXIT sign. It is the only thing in there that is providing useful information.

[@stratcat3216]

🤣

[@lc6785]

And you took the time to view and comment on something you don't believe in.

[@sigmaoctantis1892]

@@lc6785 I'm interested in understanding how people come to believe ideas that run counter to their best interest.

[@khackney]

Next, you should build a replica of Santa's North Pole workshop.

[@paullayfield]

That's just ridiculous, Santa doesn't have a workshop. It's more of a sweatshop for his Elves.

[@tanjmazmaz3731]

... that I would go see ... 😝😆 ...

[@stevenkinney2740]

I wanna see under the hood of that sleigh. That sucker can travel at a couple thousand MPH to make it to every house in 24 hours.

[@paullayfield]

@@stevenkinney2740 well technically there's different time zones and some areas don't celebrate Christmas & there's white Santa & black Santa & Mexican Santa so he doesn't have to cover everything by himself and I'm sure there will be a trans Santa coming to help too so you may or may not wanna look under that hood. I forgot where I was going with this, probably nowhere so that's good enough

[@edwaltthespisactor]

Atheists love this. It’s like watching mental contortionists at work. “The kinds model” 👌

[@thebreadbunny1863]

@Royal S biomolecules spontaneously Form. We know this.

[@thebreadbunny1863]

@Royal S not out of nothing, out of molecules under heat. Thats it. Also, the last paragraph of your message is just buzzwords. Give me the peer reviewed studies.

[@thebreadbunny1863]

@Royal S yes! I do! Or other studies, if you cant find peer reviewed ones! Just saying that people have disproven it doesnt mean they actually have.

[@thebreadbunny1863]

@Royal S then give me the studies!

[@edwaltthespisactor]

The kinds model beats something? Other than Ken Ham Eggs? I actually prefer the Russell Crowe version of the myth best - Genocide, and then kill the baby. Fits the character of Yahweh from the rest of the storybook.

[@AdaTheWatcher]

Isn't it just crazy that Noah somehow managed to harvest all the food for all the animals in advance and somehow managed to make it not rot and then somehow captured every animal that existed at that time, all that while being over 300 years old. Wow such impressive

[@kycklingklubba5749]

@Motorsoul ss No it was not. You cant have just 2 of every animal to reproduce, that wont work.

[@AdaTheWatcher]

@Motorsoul ss why didn't god just use his god magic to kill every sinner instead of flooding the earth? It would basically make the intire ark irrelevant.

[@yo9979]

@@AdaTheWatcher because He loves them.

[@peetee32]

​@@AdaTheWatcher if you've never heard of the KZbinr Pinecreek, he poses this exact questions to theists in the form of "poof or drown". God COULD HAVE eliminated his failed creation with a Thanos-like snap and everyone would have died. Instead he chose to intentionally cause babies children and women to suffer a horrific terror filled painful death as they thrashed around screaming for help as water filled their lungs and drowned. The god of loves chose drowning babies over poofing them from existence.

[@HiBoBeaux]

@@peetee32 And this is a problem how? It's God were talking about here, not you, me, or Pinecreek.

[@josenadesan]

I have one question: How do we have the different bear types today? Did they adapt or evolve?

[@stevenkinney2740]

Careful, you are going to force these people to think. They don't want that. Just answer your own questions about the ark with their standard answer to all difficult questions......"it was god magic". LOL

[@alexanderstephen1567]

Ask the same question about the 310 pigeons variation or dogs.

[@rashadmalice312]

Evolution natural selection

[@alexanderstephen1567]

@@rashadmalice312 Natural selection can`t add new information. No new information, no evolution.

[@rashadmalice312]

@@alexanderstephen1567 Bears are the youngest of the carnivore families, they come from doglike ancestors called Miacids during the Eocene Epoch 55 million to 38 million years ago and For example Polar bears have white fur due to natural selection. I'm just trying to answer the question from a evolution stand point.we know natural selection had to come in at some point.

[@markdaniel8740]

They said that polar bears were not on the ark but they were decent of the "bear kind". Polar bears diverged from black bears before the first Neanderthals evolved. How can you explain the timing?

[@FatJesus15]

You are involving evolution into this whole "ark" business. It's religion.... Science is their kryptonite. These people always to refuse to define what a "kind" is. It destroys their arguments against evolution.

[@jeanyan7738]

the earth was entirely tropical BEFORE the flood so no polar bears. No Polar ice caps until after the flood along with polar bears, which are a branch-off from the original bear kind (Ursidae)

[@shannadaul6438]

They can’t, because it didn’t happen. Don’t believe in the “timing”. And no, the earth wasn’t a tropical paradise…And the magnetic poles the earth spins on don’t just vanish. Although it has been known to wobble! South Pole: 64.07S and 135.88E I’m actually not sure if jen yan was serious…but considering some of the other comments in other threads…*sigh* I think so.

[@jeanyan7738]

before flood whole earth was most likley tropical as described in bible due to thick water vapor canopy around earth so no polar caps yet until after flood when canopy was gone. so no polar bear branch until after flood.

[@shannadaul6438]

@@jeanyan7738 So the dinosaurs and ice ages happened….. when? “Most likely tropical as described in the Bible.” So Antarctica was just water vapor?

[@Pbdave1092]

We don't like the fact that it's made of concrete... and metals beams... Also the fact that it won't even float in water.

[@anactualbear5683]

Turns out Noah's people were actually more advanced than us (hence the need for a flood to wipe their stuff away rather than just lightning bolting a person dead) so the ark wasnt holding two of every animal, it was holding the DNA sequencing or whatever might have been needed, to restore the animals after the world was "reset". I like to think the ark needed a special design given by God because it was actually a mud flood or something like that. Something that made it so animals couldn't just out swim it or hang onto a plank of wood or something, and the people couldn't just use their own boats to not drown to death. The water got too thick to swim in. Translating ancient texts into modern English is fun n' all but really it wasn't about the ark or animals, but about the friends they made along the way, ya know? Especially since only Noah's friends and family survived.

[@verleptehenk]

nice fanfiction bro

[@p.istaker8862]

Turns out you have no evidence, and only a statement . Sorry, ignore that. I have just read your peer reviewed paper. The one where you successfully translated some ambiguous ancient texts

[@anactualbear5683]

@@verleptehenk thanks. I felt like story needed some more world building to flesh it out.

[@anactualbear5683]

@@p.istaker8862 yeah next time you wanna go tell me my fiction is wrong you should first go read my fictitious peer-reviewed translation documents. You'll look less silly.

[@p.istaker8862]

@@anactualbear5683 Please have the courtesy to point them out to me and i will gladly retract my statement. But of course you can't because it's all fiction. ( thanks for such great insight)

[@wuteva4476]

where is this? I'd like to visit