Battle For The Best | RAV4 vs CX-5

[@denziiey]

i have the 2019 CX-5 GT blue mica with white interior. Freaking love this vehicle..best decision i made at this price point

[@hedgehogthesonic3181]

Do you still have it? what about reliability?

[@denziiey]

@@hedgehogthesonic3181 it's 1 year old so it's too young for me to talk about reliability. It still drives like brand new. I just wish the engine was more powerful. I think Mazda is too conservative when it comes to their engines

[@hedgehogthesonic3181]

@@denziiey I see, and what about the miles you have on it? and the average MPG? and why would you like a more powerful engine? is not like daily driving it's about getting from 0 to 60 as fast as possible, unless you take your Mazda to a race track or something

[@denziiey]

@@hedgehogthesonic3181 i have about 14k miles on it. Average MPG with my driving style and mixed highway economy amd city is about 23.4 average which is bad considering it's a baby engine. I have the non turbo engine which is way too slow and always hunts for the gears. The turbo engine runs really well though as I test drove a reserve model.

[@hedgehogthesonic3181]

@@denziiey Not bad. The mpg is not so good indeed, specially considering that there are bigger vehicles that are twice more efficient. And for how long you plan to keep your CX-5?

[@bjsimon802]

I have driven both units, the CX 5 feel very confident around corners. But the New Rav4 confident too, especially since the stiffen the chassis 58% and added torque vectoring with automatic Limited Slip Differential. Hybrid Rav4 is quiet quick, and gets 41 mpg or more. Both very good units. Rav 4 has interesting AWD system Rear driveline disconnect. My Rav4 saved me many harsh snow conditions. This is definitely the most safest Rav4, the small overlap test, it passed with no problems, and got top safety awards.

[@James-rd9mo]

Rav4 wins in fuel economy, cargo capacity, masculine looks, reliability and resale value. CX5 wins in driving feel/handling/acceleration and elegant looks.

[@Toyota4Life]

James front end of the Mazda is ugly

[@Toyota4Life]

Sirgromulus nope. That’s why the Rav-4 sells more. More people like the design of the RAV4

[@Sirgromulus]

I generally agree but check out the latest (Sep 2019) Consumer Reports reliability rating of the CX-5. It is their highest (and only "highest") rated compact SUV re. reliability.

[@Sirgromulus]

@@Toyota4Life Toyota is a larger company, advertises more, and sells more cars in general. 'nough said son.

[@Toyota4Life]

Sirgromulus no. The rav4 has a better reputation loyal buyers and generations of long lasting models it has nothing to do with advertisement to go to has built the reputation of the RAV4 since I was a child. Stop the hate

[@juliemiles2834]

CX-5 is a honey with the turbo, also beautiful inside and out. It would definitely be my choice.

[@kevinstarski1598]

I test drove both of these vehicles and there was no comparison when it came to perceived quality...Toyota drove like a bigger Corolla and Mazda felt fantastic.

[@MGM_Think]

Lucky, the dealer in my country does not offer test drive. you have to buy the car to try it for the first time, if you don't like it, too bad, no backsies.

[@UnseenSpirit]

kevin starski depends on your priorities. Madagascar will drive better but most will go for the rav4 on fuel economy, reliability, resale value and of course the extra space.

[@matty_o]

UnseenSpirit Madagascar?.?

[@Ethan7s]

I know what Scotty Kilmer would pick here: 1994 Toyota Celica

[@kevinW826]

Ethan Scotty is a crack pot who click baits. Not a fan of loud mouth twits.

[@ModernDIYProjects]

@@kevinW826 Scottys click bait is off the chart! No one comes close to him on that.

[@MrWannaBAlone]

1 year later, he did admit he was wrong about Mazda

[@patlabuca3484]

Mazda CX-5. Elegant exterior styling, premium quality interior, refined driving dynamics, it's fun to drive! Competes more with entry-level premium German makes in overall quality, at the price point of Toyota.

[@jonmagnusrestad]

Would go for the Mazda👍

[@kencoleman8929]

Agreed, CX 5 for my money and values as well!

[@chuckmccollim]

We purchased 2019 Mazda C-5 Signature in Soul Red Crystal Metallic and really enjoy it. We liked the many safety features, comfort, drive, styling, etc. Make sure you test drive several or all the autos you are looking at, and keep an open mind. Also, make sure you like the dealership. Ask the local dealer what their hourly labor rate is (you probably will be shocked) and how much normal oil changes, etc cost. I found that our local Pensacola, FL Mazda dealer had very reasonable pricing on service.

[@tommy13965]

Problem with the RAV4 is the weak engine for a bigger suv. Cx5 looks way better and more premium.

[@JJustinXu]

tommy13965 get the Hybrid XSE 219hp.

[@James-rd9mo]

Rav4 gas models do have fairly weak engines and mediocre 8 speed transmission. Both are addressed in the hybrid which is far improved over previous gen.

[@shamingandembrassingdriver2718]

Get a v6 engine from the 3rd gen rav and its game over for cx5 hahha

[@tommy13965]

Jackass Dick I don’t keep my cars for more than 2 yrs so longevity issues doesn’t effect me. So you can lol with your 10 yr old Toyota in the future.🤷‍♂️

[@squireman72]

I just bought the CX-5 turbo after test driving both. The Mazda is such a blast to drive and handles like a sports sedan.

[@koukimonzta]

the CX5 will make you feel like a CEO of a company. That is if you opt for the grand touring and above!

[@udaykaransinghsidhu]

Driven both. CX5 kills it. CX5 is quite and nice inside. Engine is more zippy. Rav4 still seems underpowered when those horses are needee on road. Bought CX5 in end.

[@kendallalston504]

Wow Alex you are the man!!! These are the exact two models I was cross shopping. Perfect timing!!

[@EMichaelBall]

In your shoes, if I wanted to get a compact SUV, I'd look no further than a 2009-2012 RAV4. In case there's another recession, you don't want a big car debt load. Ideally, you don't want any car debt. Getting a repo is no fun, and the effect on your credit will hurt future job prospects. It's not worth the risk.

[@kendallalston504]

@@EMichaelBall wow thanks for the insight. I greatly appreciate that.

[@kellydysantini6498]

Mazda CX-5 for me. 😍

[@tntmyth]

This is getting pricey at nearly $40k for mainstream subcompacts. That price threshold is making me think "Ah...No.".You can look at an Acura RDX with Tech Package for not much more and it's notably nicer. The Kia Telluride is a lot more vehicle for the same money. More motor, more space, more standard features, more towing capacity, decent mileage with the Atkins Cycle engine. Subaru Forester is less expensive for all trims, gets excellent gas mileage and standard AWD. Competes well with both of these for thousands less. The Mazda is nice though. If I decided I could live with less cargo space, I would get the Grand Touring Reserve, just as nice and a few thousand less than the Signature, far enough away in price from the RDX to make it a good buy.

[@davidjames1692]

I find what is missing from this review is how well the safety features (lane keeping, cruise etc.) work.

[@ajanicunningham9617]

I'm sorry, but can we stop and talk about Alex's glasses? Like, those are BEYOND awesome! Good on you, sir! Good on you!

[@bill7481]

CX5. No question.

[@bobpurcell5662]

"Torque vectoring rear axle ... really adds an interesting twist ..." I see what you did there!

[@dorothy135]

Leased a Red CX5 2019 Signature and I love it. I drove a Rav 4 hybrid but the CX5 was the better car for me. Handling and luxury feel trumped the Toyota. I really wanted a Hybrid but I could not look away from the CX5. I'll decide what to do in 3 yrs, but for now I 'm a happy camper ;=)

[@Pilot_10]

How much was your lease and did it include navigation? I'm torn between the two

[@Stevintage]

what's the update now after 3 years? haha

[@dorothy135]

Bought it in 2019. Have 16,106 miles and love it.

[@Stevintage]

@@dorothy135 haha ok awesome to hear!

[@dorothy135]

@Stevintage Thanks. I feel like I am missing something. Did you expect regrets?

[@rightlanehog3151]

$38,100 for this RAV4 puts it in 4Runner territory. And speaking of the 4Runner, the FJ that cruised by in the opposite lane and this Adventure have a two-tone paint finish that ought to be available in the 4Runner as well. A 30K RAV4 Hybrid LE, seems like the sweet spot in the RAV4 lineup with its outstanding mpg and enough real world traction for 97% of shoppers in this compact CUV segment.

[@ethanmckibbin]

I can buy a Highlander cheaper than a RAV4 it's disgusting

[@rightlanehog3151]

@@ethanmckibbin It is remarkable how some people will load up basic models to the point where they surpass the next class of vehicle.

[@ethanmckibbin]

@@rightlanehog3151 my 2018 platinum was no cheap RAV4 but the 2019s sell for 42k everyday at my dealership not to mention I think it's just a jeep with a Toyota badge. Highlander is so much better for the price

[@tommy13965]

Don’t tell that to the Toyota fanboys they swear they got a bargain because it’s a Toyota lmao.

[@ethanmckibbin]

@@tommy13965 I've purchased over 5 Toyotas but I'm not paying 40k for a rav4

[@yessitsme6884]

I really wanted a RAV4 Hybrid because of that fuel economy, but after trying it a few times with me (6') and my son (6'3"), the RAV4 just felt too cramped. It's got the lowest headroom of the category. One test drive of the CX-5 and the deal was sealed, it feels great to drive and it's just a nice place to be. I'm typically getting low 30s MPG in the CX-5 (non turbo) so not bad at all. I did have to sacrifice cargo capacity though, but so far it hasn't been an issue, it just takes a bit more planning to fit everything sometimes.

[@rightlanehog3151]

Toyota has really reduced headroom and interior space with all their new TNGA variants.

[@JJustinXu]

Rocking From Home the CX-5 is way too small. I don’t now what your talking about...the cargo space was way too small and I felt very cramped in the CX-5.

[@thomassiegle2298]

@@JJustinXu is there a spare tire in these 2 vehicles

[@alaind831]

Rav4 hybrid fuel economy is a major reason why I'm looking at it (from a gen2 MDX) but at 6'3" and family of 4 going skiing it may be just too small and might look at highlander when new hybrid version comes out next year. I like the cx5 look though I have not driven one yet.

[@ccroy2001]

I want to like the RAV4 I own a 2010 Ford Escape which is the “Truckette” version and it’s cute, but whenever I see a new RAV4 on the street I don’t like the looks, not sure why? The CX-5 looks great especially in red. I would have to go with Mazda.

[@JJustinXu]

Christine Roy you need to look at the Hybrid RAV4. XSE Hybrid or Limited Hybrid. They both look the nicest!!!

[@ccroy2001]

Justin Xu If I got one I would definitely go with the hybrid 👍

[@JJustinXu]

Christine Roy yes! The RAV4 Hybrid has the best mpg in its class, also its faster. The XSE Hybrid is the RAV4 that has the blacked out roof and blacked out wheels, which is a nicer RAV4.

[@johnnytampocao7671]

I prefer the CX-5 it looks great I like the minimalistic look of this car. 💕 💕

[@bextar6365]

Johnny T.....I agree...The black abbreviated fender trim on the Rav-4 looks weird, and also the black plastic strangely shaped rocker covers .

[@joelarson6884]

Sad the RAV4 is so slow. Back in 2012 it blew away everything with the v6 engine. Alex, you should get your hands on one of those!

[@lxvlyxbrii]

Had a 2015 rav4 limited. Actually it was my wifes car that got dumped on me because she moved on to a luxury brand. I got bored of driving it around and the 2019 design caught my eye. Went for a test drive of the limited and was very disappointed. Except a little bit of power upgrade and interior tweaks not much has changed. Same boring steering and the engine and road noise is actually louder than my 2015 limited. Almost 40 grand car but does not even have illuminated power window buttons (only the driver window button is illuminated). Good luck fishing for the mirror adjustment button at night. Went to test drive the CX5 GTR and told them to take my money immediately. If you want your smile of the day go test drive the turbo. Puts one on my face everyday now.

[@Areweonfiya]

all SUVs are boring

[@kdomster9141]

1300 dollars of savings when buying CX5 over RAV4 offsets fuel economy difference and you still have much much quicker car in CX5 !

[@JJustinXu]

k domster the CX-5 is horrible. Reliability, mpg, too small.

[@James-rd9mo]

$1300 price difference will be negated in 1 year. Over 10 years the Rav4 hybrid will save $13,000 in fuel savings over CX5 (and less CO2). For myseld it's worth giving up a bit of driving feel to save that money and C02. Don't forget CX5 prefers premium fuel so cost will be even more if filling up on that. If you do fill up on regular you have the same HP as rav4 hybrid around 220.

[@JJustinXu]

James agreed, I just don’t understand why people don’t want a RAV4. I mean if you want a fast car why not get one as a weekend car. I bought the RAV4 Hybrid for fuel economy and I have a Lexus RCF as a weekend car.

[@kdomster9141]

@@James-rd9mo No , CX5 can be fine on regular, and on regular it is lot more powerful and will accelerate in much more relaxed and quiet way than 2.5 in Toyota that is very loud and feels taxed and strained when forced to quicker acceleration. From my math 1300usd of savings will take long time , many years for someone driving on average 10 to 12K miles per year . CX5 also feels build better with much classier and better material that company like Toyota must reserve for Lexus and Mazda can offer it in Mazda because it does not have internal strategy or politics of saving their best for their premium brand like Toyota does with Lexus....

[@kdomster9141]

@@JJustinXu Reliavility in Mazda is top notch , if you need extra room get larger car so for me that is not an argument , mpg difference will be negated in lower cost ... I can buy 2.5t CX5 at 32K usd right now so price difference can be lot more than just 1300usd

[@ThatGuy-kv1kw]

Alex brown wood is out. Mazda choose the perfect shade

[@jerrycurls88]

Agree with you Alex. CX-5 FTW!

[@MsVS1221]

As a female, I really like the look of both vehicles. I own a 2015 RAV4 and I really love it. I have maintained the RAV4 per the service schedule and had no problems with it until 92,000 miles and now it has an oil leak that Toyota wants $2300.00 to fix. NOT HAPPY. So I take that Toyota is bulletproof stuff with a grain of salt. I have driven both of these 2020 models and there were things that I liked and disliked about both. It is going to be a hard decision as to which one we will purchase.

[@kartikiyer5547]

Both the cars are a compromise at some level. I was also choosing between the two and i finally went with Rav4 because of bad driving ergonomics of CX-5. Rav4 seems more comfortable.

[@maenq1981]

I like this guy’s reviews, very informative.. plz review more and compare mid-size SUV’s

[@stephenhendricks103]

I think Alex more or less nailed it in terms of a comparison of these two vehicles. Toyota has improved the looks of the RAV4 significantly but the CX-5 is still a better looking rig. If I were shopping for a car I would feel good about driving day in and day out, it would be the Mazda. On the other hand if good looks were my top priority I wouldn't be shopping for a compact crossover. The CX-5 doesn't entail the sacrifice in terms of utility that its big brother, the CX-9, demands but the cramped interior and class trailing overall cargo space suggests that the Mazda is an excellent SUV for those who don't need an SUV. The RAV4 doesn't lead the class in terms of versatility but it's significantly ahead of the CX-5. If looks were a top priority, I'd opt for the Mazda6 rather than either one. And if I were looking for the "utility" an SUV claims to provide, I'd go for the Hyundai Santa Fe or wait to hear more about the forthcoming Ford Escape with its improved looks and (possibly) more accommodating interior space than the RAV4.

[@bextar6365]

I also would go for the new Santa Fe and I did, I'm super satisfied. Also own a Subaru Outback.. my S-Fe is my favorite.

[@billharris7235]

I did go with the Mazda 6 Signature and couldn't be happier!

[@vietnameseloempia]

Cx5 all the way

[@ARKSpunky1]

Looking to go smaller than my Murano Platinum without giving up the luxury. My partner is hooked on radar cruise control so that's a must. Really appreciate this review and all of your reviews. Wanted something a bit more boxy (usually my preference) and higher off the ground. Love the Volvo but no local dealer and not reliable enough. Like the CR-V but worried about their recent issue's and really don't want another CVT. Want to drive a Sportage SX but the local dealer doesn't have any. Loved the feel of the CX-5 but drove the Rav since it's a bit taller and boxier. I drove various models before narrowing it down including the Cherokee. The Rav transaxle reminded me of the dreadful ZF 9 speed with Jeep programing. Ended up feeling much less powerful due to the transaxle and power is a priority to me. Also found the Rav less refined with more NHV. The corner cutting like no power passenger seat made made it feel way overpriced. The Mazda is the whole package feature wise and performance wise. As impressive as my 14 MDX was performance and refinement wise. How would you compare the CX-5 to the Sportage SX? Trying to decide if it's worth the hassle of testing one. Sorry you were sick but thanks for powering through. You're the best reviewer out there!

[@trespasser121]

So you didn't like the Cherokee? Seems to have the power and comfort factors, good looks also, but I'm still worried about reliability. But maybe it's just Jeep owners abusing their vehicles?

[@ABSVabeautifulsunsetvlog]

I think you’re marketing these to two very different consumers. The Mazda is more elegant, and trying to compete with entry level BMW’s and other premium brands...while the RAV4 is more “rugged” and targeting the light outdoorsy type. I don’t think that price point is a valid reason to point to any type of comparison because these are two very different crossovers.

[@omelborpon3159]

Random thoughts 1. MPG, and therefore carbon emissions, should always be considerations when shopping for a car. Why use dwindling fossil fuels to contribute to increased climate change? 2. Taste is a matter of personal preference. You don't need a reviewer to tell you that one car is prettier than another one. You can look at them and make your own decision. 3. Alex is one of the few reviewers who rate seat comfort, and it is greatly appreciated.

[@netrun4]

Looking forward to the RAV4 hybrid long term review. We have the previous version & can say it’s a bit of a unicorn in its segment because of nvh, fuel economy, off road capability, and overall utility.

[@rabbitruck]

Road noise is disappointing in the new Rav hybrid, having just taken a 1600 mile road trip in one. Fuel economy is great in typical mixed driving, but is unimpressive at sustained highway speeds. Cargo space is great. Foul weather capability is likely good enough for 95% of folks. IMO, the new Rav hybrid is really good for what the average person uses a car for. Not perfect, but the best overall package for average American driving conditions.

[@willjacobsmusic]

I drove both of these and ended up getting a 2020 Sportage SX Turbo. Cheaper, more options, faster, and better warranty. My wife has a CX-9, and I really like the looks of the Mazda, but you just get more for your money with Kia.

[@stephenhendricks103]

I felt the same way when I bought a Sorento rather than a CX-9 last year.

[@JuWithTheView]

i prefer the toyota's cargo cap over it being "pretty"

[@lisaw7633]

Alex I agree the Mazda is much better looking and I too would gladly give up that little cargo space. I'm so impressed with Mazda . It's definitely on my radar. I've been binge watching these videos and every time it's positive input.

[@erickbedolla3708]

I really like the graphs that are displayed during the video, very helpful.

[@SamKhoury]

I'd like to see Alex compare the RAV4 Prime when it's released with the CX-5 Grand Touring Reserve or Signature (one of the models with the Turbo 4 cylinder engine).

[@JC-rm6pm]

Im amazed how cool the Rav4 looks in person

[@lrob5657]

I think Alex is a great car reviewer, however I personally believe this is a poor comparison on so many levels. The RAV4 has a come a long way and Toyota is doing some good things with their lineup but the CX-5 is just simply on another level in terms of quality, refinement, and overall driving feel/performance. The only thing that’s comparable is the price and that’s the beautiful thing about the CX-5. You get so much more for your money with the CX-5. The RAV4 costing more than the CX-5 is pretty laughable. Bravo Mazda!

[@Sirgromulus]

Agreed!

[@legambaz]

To me they're opposing in almost every way. The CX5 is refine, invitingly beautiful inside out, a great driver's SUV. And the Rav 4 is just an offroad junky and it looks that way in every angle. Toyota has always have reliability and economy. But that's all they have.

[@slyfoxx2973]

Well reliability and economy are the two most important traits for most people.

[@phillyboyfloyd7050]

Also in the northern states they do very well in deepr snow conditions

[@academiaengineering5136]

I’ll take the rav4 adventure because of the way it looks like on the interior and exterior and for camping and traveling places

[@stephenspain9167]

Thanks for the comparison, I've been looking at these two for a while as a replacement car for my wife. The problem is once you move to trims over $30k I think the Passport Sport is the better bang for the buck. What do you think? An awd 2019 Mazda cx5 sport with safety package I've seen advertised for around $24k although they're get hard to find with 2020 rolling in.

[@KJ-iq7fm]

Seems like a lot of folks online on forums/etc are unhappy with Toyota's new 8-speed transmission in the RAV4 & Camry. Even Scotty Kilmer recommended against, at least for now. I suppose Mazda's relatively older 6-speed auto is more reliable in that sense?

[@Argedis]

Yep, Toyota messed up there's a lot of issues with the new 8-speed. Mazda's NA Skyactiv engines and transmissions have been tried and true now since 2012. The turbo is still new so that's still in the air. Toyota used to be the ones that held out on upgrading their engines and transmissions to new technology to iron out issues and keep them reliable. Remember when they still had the bulletproof 4-speed auto for the longest? So by the time they released the 6-speed it was also bulletproof... but this time I suppose they gave in to 'keep up' with other manufacturers and probably rushed it for the release of the new Camry and Rav4. Now Mazda is the one holding out and playing it safe, they even held out on releasing the Skyactiv-X on the Mazda 3 and I applaud them for that. Better to iron out all the kinks to ensure they release something solid.

[@stephenhendricks103]

@@Argedis I agree with much of what you said. But I think you're making a virtue of a necessity as far as Mazda is concerned. Mazda hasn't "held out on releasing the Skyactiv-X on the Mazda3. As the smallest independent manufacturer they don't have the production resources to release Skyactiv-X engines in the huge US market. It's already available in other markets. Nor do they have the design and production resources to keep up with rivals in terms of new transmissions.

[@elusivellama]

CX-5 turbo, hands down. I need power and the RAV4 is too weak.

[@James-rd9mo]

2019 rav4 hybrid 219 hp with electric motors helping with torque. Mazda CX5 also on regular fuel 227hp. 8hp difference.

[@nighttimestalker]

@@James-rd9mo That's on cheaper gas. The CX 5 pushes 250 with premium. Plus the hybrid rav 4 has a CVT

[@red.riot.2280]

I like both. Toyota has need having some issues lately. Gas tank problem. Fuel pump. Engine crack recall. I’d have to go with the Mazda.. at least for now.

[@breathjustic]

I hope that mazda should increase the cargo capacity of CX5 at the next year.

[@hynsum]

Are there are any rumors about next gen CX5?

[@stephenhendricks103]

That's a possibility but Mazda faces a challenge in doing so as long as they hold onto their turbo 4 in the CX-5. The massive exhaust manifold and associated turbo hardware is mounted behind the engine. It increases the length of the vehicle by nearly a foot and significantly limits interior space. The CX-5 is 179" long. To make it competitive in terms of interior space it would have to be more than a half a foot longer and that would make it the longest SUV in the compact class.

[@dquarksli4798]

Buy the CX 9 is the best option. People that needs room should go for the bigger CX 9 and not have to always complain the CX 5 lack of space.

[@paulcu130]

CX 5 All day every day.

[@RangerAmateur]

Upper 30K for mainstream SUVs is bit too much for me. i know they will enjoy some dealer discounts but so will RDX. A lower trim RDX will be my choice.

[@rafaljankowski2807]

OMG my 2010 Rav4 AWD was $25K.Geez how did they get to $37K?

[@twystedhumour]

Well, don't let Norm T hear you say that LOL. He'd suggest a Buick!

[@johnfranklin5277]

So I'm thinking the reason the same engine, develops more horsepower on premium. Instead of regular, is because when the KNOCK SENSOR detects pinging on regular fuel, it instantly retards the timing, thereby reducing horsepower. With premium, engine does not ping, so timing stays advanced, increasing the horsepower. Am I correct on this??

[@nighttimestalker]

Yes. It can determine engine knock. Which is smart tbh.

[@gregorytrane7828]

These vehicles are not much cheaper than the Acura entry level SUV. The RAV 4 is more for utility and deeper snow tracking. The Mazda CX-5 is more oriented for sport driving and lighter snow tracking. The Mazda is going to be more fun to own and drive unless you're going for practically only.

[@twystedhumour]

But that Acura turbo is quite thirsty. And that turbo lag is noticeable for lead-footed ppl who came from the V6 RDX.

[@rayngrace]

Which of these classes has the highest seating or viewing position. We have a Subaru Forester already, but, we're looking for a higher driver's POV so we can see ahead in traffic. Thanks

[@Corkfish1]

I'd prefer to get the Mazda, but the cylinder deactivation in the non turbo models is a dealbreaker for me. Who was the idiot who came up with that idea?

[@ngalladerrick6820]

CX-5 more premium, good quality interior and exterior design ..more to that less expensive.. so I will go for CX-5, without looking bk!!👌👌🍷

[@UnseenSpirit]

Just read the 2021 Toyota rav4 prime will be 5.8 secs to 0-60. But how much will it be?

[@OldDood]

We rented an Adventure for a week last month. 32 mpg on mostly two lane highways. It was very comfortable. What Alex does NOT speak of is over all RELIABILITY over 5 to 10 years. Toyota has that reputation and for that I would get a RAV4 (Limited though)

[@Argedis]

Toyota's new 8-speed automatic has been getting a TON of issues and complaints from customers with the new Camry and Rav4... Scotty Kilmer even made a video about it, but you can also go to CarComplaints.com and see for yourself. Their old 6 speed was bulletproof they should have stuck with that until they ironed out all the issues in the new one. Mazda has been using the same 6-speed Skyactiv transmission in all their cars since 2013 and has been tried and true now. The new turbo engine is still relatively new so that's still up for debate but the NA Skyactiv engines have also been bulletproof since 2012.

[@Sirgromulus]

@@Argedis Exactly. Nice to see someone commenting based on actual facts and not a "fanboy" merely stating an opinion.

[@OldDood]

@@Argedis I have made posts about my concerns with the newer 8 speed. Recently in fact. I did find that the new RAV4 'hunted' more then I liked when compared the to Toyota 6 speed. In fact we still own a 2007 Camry XLE V6. (79K) When that model came out they had a 'Cold Start Slip' on the 6 speed. It was fixed and we never had had a problem since. With Toyota's reputation I would put hard money that they will address this problem. I also follow Scotty Kilmer so you should know his 'opinion' on Turbo Engines. Scotty's latest video (per this time frame) says it all: "I Ranked All Car Brands from Worst to Best" LINK: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fma7h6SYesyGf6c

[@kevinjs26]

Do they both have rear seats that fold flat? I like to go camping and sleep on a flat surface in the back.

[@sergevivier2861]

After shopping for 6 months, my wife bought the same RAV 4 as tested here and I really like the fuel economy the ride and handling.

[@bjsimon802]

The Rav4 is meant for the Adventurous person who has a outdoor lifestyle, and the Mazda is smaller and meant for a bit more luxury and driving performance. My friend has 184 HP engine, in real world he is getting only 20 to 21 mpg, where the Rav4 is getting 27 to 32MPG. They both serve a function.

[@hereigoagain5050]

Another great review. Are the top trims worth the $10K premium? Almost $40K for a small SUV seems expensive to me.

[@Theeverythingman23]

HereIgoAgain my thoughts exactly. We are 5 years away from something like this being $45k which sounds ridiculous.

[@billharris7235]

I'd wait a year and buy a lightly used CX5. That top Signature trim is worth the upgrade, but not at new price.

[@pbentsonable]

No one pays sticker price

[@JL-ms1xk]

I just bought my CX-5 GS Comfort, I like it! I didn't try RAV-4 because of the interior.

[@valdius85]

I was extremely excited about new RAV4... and then I've learned it's offered with 2.0l and a CVT in my market. Then I sat inside and found out that at 5'5 I cannot find a comfortable position... For short people, Mazda and CR-V are the most comfortable.

[@valdius85]

@Jackass Dick Japan

[@lisaw7633]

One video on the CX 30 a guy claims that the AC was sub par. Do you know anything about this? And that the camera was grainy

[@therickibobby4865]

I generally agree that Toyota the better car but Mazda takes the cake with the acceleration, reliability and smoothness.

[@Shadownian]

For me its a debate out of.... Rav4 Passport I keep going back and forth on those 2. also include the RDX and the 4Runner on occassion as well...but mostly stick to the Rav and Passport

[@dcam456]

The only issue I find with Honda is you have to go to the higher trim levels for their electronic safety options.

[@Shadownian]

@@dcam456 ya I'm looking at top trims on both.

[@Danielle-tx2es]

alex please make a review of 2021 class c...rav4, cx5, passport, venza..please please...well i like the clearance because im afraid of floadings...but i want to buy the beeest and coool...thanks

[@LacoteCohen]

I'm a Toyota guy, but the Mazda is better looking

[@Lulu-oi9ue]

I have ordered a Mazda 3 over a Toyota Corolla. Mazda wins for me because it drove better, looks better and has a lot of tech. I’m looking to get the RAV4 or cx5 next year and I feel I may get the cx5 because of the reason I got the Mazda 3. Wish the rav had heads up display and was more competitive with price.

[@dygardion9130]

You said you’d be willing to give up practicality for style till you need the the cargo space 😂

[@stephenhendricks103]

Well, Alex has a Dodge Durango, as well. It softens the sacrifice. :)

[@dygardion9130]

Stephen Hendricks ooo yea lol

[@Danielle-tx2es]

i loove the rav4...i lot more than the cx5..what about the infinitycx50...is the a lot more the price?

[@sunflowerdeath]

I just dont understand, why would anyone even consider non hybrid RAV-4 at all. The cost difference is so small, and it is so much better in every possible way.

[@kevinstarski1598]

Perhaps they dont need or want awd or complexity that comes with the hybrid design

[@JJustinXu]

Andrey Petrov that’s why it only costed 800 dollars more for my XSE.

[@slyfoxx2973]

Because the hybrid will not last as long without sinking serious cash into a new battery and generator.

[@hedgehogthesonic3181]

@@slyfoxx2973 The battery last between 10 / 15 years and more, and there is no such thing as a generator on Toyota hybrids.

[@ModernDIYProjects]

Is the new Rav4 Engine Direct injected or manifold injected as before? I know Toyota resists change as they have not gone to turbos yet.

[@volatilememory9338]

It has both MPI and DI.

[@ModernDIYProjects]

@@volatilememory9338 Good, It has an updated injection system, Thanks!

[@LoveStallion]

I'd proooooobably go Rav4? Probably? I dunno. I'm mad at Toyota over Android Auto and I'm mad at Mazda for their boneheaded infotainment restrictions.

[@AAutoBuyersGuide]

The RAV gets Android Auto this year according to Toyota.

[@tendeant]

Did toyota change the roof color from ice silver to just white this yr??

[@penvon]

I haven’t watched the video & I know that Alex is going to choose the CX-5....You could put a Yugo against the RAV4 & he’d choose the Yugo.

[@efavuzza73]

Alex what about Mazda diesel

[@EchoSigma6]

RAV4 is the choice for me. The build quality, practicality, size, and fuel economy is superior. Styling is subjective and I don’t plan to drag race my compact cross over.

[@theodorekell]

Build quality of Toyota is better than Mazda? This is too much

[@theodorekell]

You work as professional mechanic - great. I don't work as one but I fix and previously rebuild cars for 30+ years. You want to tell me that in the last 15 years people have not come to you with their toyotas with the following complaints: leaky main seal and excessive oil consumption? Of course, this doesn't constitute "build quality", as under build quality I see, how car holds up for a long haul. For this I can tell you. As Toyota was going worse; Mazda was improving after splitting from Ford. Yes, they don't have many models to worry about but nevertheless, they do good. And CR reflects this placing them on 4th position that they had for a while until new arrivals like cx9 didn't take them down few ticks, temporarily. But when it comes to assembly quality, Mazda is unparalleled right now. All the panels designed to fit perfectly and since most of their cars still come from Japan, you can believe that Japanese worker's dedication is way above everyone else. I just bought a Highlander. Its not too bad. I've seen worse from Toyota. Still, no the same precision as my 3 mazdas I also own right now. I know that Toyota will have better hardware - rotors, hose clamps and bolts that holding it together. But will have much worse struts and shocks that will need replacement 7-8 years later. My last Toyota had 8 recalls and 1 warranty repair. My 3 MAzdas (nearly same year), together, had 4 recalls (2x2 -same car), one of which was software update. Although one of toyota recalls was label correction. I wouldn't jump if I was you.

[@EchoSigma6]

theodorekell Appears we both lean on our own understanding. There is no perfect manufacturer, let’s agree to disagree. I’ll be loyal to Toyota and you with Mazda. Going back to the first point, this was an opinion by me as asked by Alex on a comment request for viewers, not to necessarily debate over the minutia ranging from 30 years to recent.

[@naveenkrishnamurthy7576]

Why didn’t you pick the cx5 turbo since it’s your all time favorite for acceleration? Why does sales play a role in your purchase?

[@RobBanks81]

He did. That is the turbo model.

[@naveenkrishnamurthy7576]

RobBanks81 I meant why he didn’t order that instead of the rav4

[@kdomster9141]

If I was a Subaru buyer looking for off road at cost on road feel that this RAV4 maybe the car to get. If you are looking for entry premium feel , say Audi or Merc buyer looking for performance, style , luxury than CX5 is hard to beat and save 10K dollars ....

[@dhavalmistry4570]

can we compare Honda Clarity Plug-in Hybrid vs Tesla model 3? cost of ownership. I know you usually dont do cost of ownership kind of comparison. I dont know but I feel, Honda is much cheaper with more benefits. Honda Clarity is more cheaper compare to other all plug-in hybrid.

[@michaelloh6910]

CX5 looks so cool...

[@centauri0]

Still waiting for Android Auto in the Rav4. No point in buying a car without it. It's going to be hard to decide next year when the new Ford Escape comes out.

[@keving7940]

If your comparing a toyota to a ford than I would go Toyota, I was a loyal toyota owner and I thought reliability wasnt too much of a concern for me but after all my breakdowns of my explorer and how my fusion is starting to be that way, I would get the toyota even if I'm not a toyota fan.

[@jasonwilliams6773]

Did you make a bet with someone on how many times you could say "overall" in one review?

[@razorsedge7501]

Mazda and it ain't close. Toyota just isn't as reliable as they used to be and Mazda now offers more tech and features at a cheaper price, while being more reliable in every facet. Sure Toyota can go off roading better but Jeep's are still better in that department anyway.

[@tjs114]

Even though I am not a big fan of Toyota products, I would choose the RAV4 because of it's likely reliability, better gas mileage and more interior space. I'd also prefer a company that doesn't open and close their dealerships willy-nilly like Mazda.

[@trailblazeratv6306]

CX5 Turbo is a rocket 🚀

[@varudds]

Overall Mazda CX-5 is the Winner. RAV4 looks terrible

[@Dol143]

CX5

[@mountainhobo]

Put RAV4 Hybrid in place of the Adventure here, and the contest ends.

[@rightlanehog3151]

True.

[@jamessicat]

Rav4 wins because the CX5 will have a carbon build up in the engine

[@jamessicat]

@Bill H Not true. No fuel cleaners could clean the carbon build up on skyactiv engines.

[@samliang4146]

Hi, can u do a short video of acceleration for cx 5 turbo

[@tomeng9520]

On Volvo xc60 2019 clearance for vehicles not equipped with air suspension is 8.5 inches. So pretty much the same as Toyota.

[@edwinalfredo310]

I don't understand why Toyotas are so desirable

[@drn13355]

Reliability and resale values are best. You may not "understand" this, but that is why. In the 80s and 90s US cars were literally junk. Many people switched to Toyota/Honda and now it is hard to get people to switch back even if US reliability is much better. Perception is reality.

[@JJustinXu]

Edwin Alfredo reliability

[@edwinalfredo310]

I think it is because "reliability reputation" because nowadays there are other reliable brands

[@hedgehogthesonic3181]

@@edwinalfredo310 Toyota is still at the top.

[@edwinalfredo310]

@@hedgehogthesonic3181 yeah the bmw supra and the mazda yaris have definitely put them at the top

[@mattman6458]

Rav 4 xse hybrid is my choice. The gas model just doesnt compare to the hybrid

[@Toyota4Life]

Matt Man XSE Rav-4 hands down looks better then the Mazda

[@mikenone4077]

Wait over $35k for a small suv that is insane!. Im stickin to my 97 corolla

[@idkwhyiam9440]

cars are expensive these days

[@tommy13965]

Even a new corolla xse is over 27k

[@ro0ster648]

Well that is toward the high end of the trim levels. The RAV4 LE goes for only $24k out the door here in SoCal.

[@tommy13965]

Ro0ster so cal I assume it’s the fwd version over here in the northeast you need awd.

[@ro0ster648]

@@tommy13965 yeah, that is for like the base FWD with only necessities like carpet floor and cargo mats.