Behringer 2600 Analog Synth - Should You Choose It Over The Poly D?

[@djmikio]

Just confirms what I felt from the start. The question is not "which to buy" but "which to buy FIRST"

[@Steve81M]

How the hell could anyone choose with Jack absolutely shredding the hell out of both synths?! That was incredible!

[@johnwilkinson5811]

The more Jack plays the Poly D the more he's turning into Bernie Worrell. Which is a funky good thing.

[@erswell961]

Love your output Jack - guitarist getting into keys and you’ve been a huge help. Humour, good chops and honest approach. Sweet! Keep it up and thanks from down-under (but not from my bank account!)

[@MrOuija-rr8kq]

I love it when people compare two different synths. Sometimes they aren’t all that different and in sound. You may already have the synth you desire.

[@torbenanschau6641]

There are dozens of demovideos around of both. But you are actually one of the very first to really take the Poly-D and the 2600 as what it is, a new synth without testing all the time how well the originals have been cloned. I own the Poly-D for a couple of months but instantly you've made some sounds I've never came across yet and chaining both together at the end was the idea, you've done some great performance there.

[@soniklink-WKD4496]

Just bought the 2600 from you! I realized I did not need the Gray Meanie after all, as I can run the 2600 thru my Grandmother ( Spring Reverb). Quality! Thanks again Andertons :)

[@eddiezzz100]

The dad comment was gold :)

[@elderchildren]

this is so dank. thank you, literally covered my own thought process here.

[@MARTINORMANCV]

If you were to create a eurorack set up to emulate the 2600, it would cost you a significant amount of money. For under £600 is a no brainer. Like the Neutron.

[@Neumah]

This. I ordered the 2600 as a first stepping stone into modular hardware. It seems like an amazing platform to start with, and what you get for the money is just astonishing. Now, who knows what the MTBF will be on these things, but still. I'm hella excited.

[@d5uncr]

If you don't need the tactile hardware knob-twiddling you can do it for free on your computer, using VCV Rack. It's a free software Eurorack with emulations of many of the available hardware modules. There's even an ARP Odyssey module called STS Oddy.

[@pcuimac]

Apples and Oranges? Yeah, exactly. The 2600 is for people who want to design sounds and add a sequencer to it, or even multiple sequencer and a keybed. The Model D is more of an instrument for bass or a synth meldoy.

[@andycarrillo48]

do you have a go to synth with 61 keys for synth melodies? like warm tones. and do you have a vst i should def cop that sounds analogue. im tryna go for a vst that has that retro sound and the look is like a synth keyboard and it has arps on it and a detuner or transpose type of knob?

[@jacobbrown1690]

@@andycarrillo48 get a king korg

[@KingCrimson82]

n spacy pads that differ a bit from the allmighty Oberheim while being "almost therish"

[@danpreston564]

I don’t have a Poly D, but I do have a Sub37 and a 2600, and the tone of both machines is very similar. The 2600 sounds very Moogy.

[@noisynois1670]

I have subsequent, neutrón,model d,more modulares eurorack de Erica synth and virus ti,Roland v synth Deepmind 12 the wasp uno drums tbr3 de behringer,minibrute Roli seaboard and i al m paralitic hace some time,this time healing ,no se hablar inglés pero tengos unos dolores terribles me quitan los clavos y la liare bastante con mi música algo he podido hacer hechar un ojo son varios estilos saludos

[@geerhoar]

@Rhizosphere Play with the saturation and patching for different filter types to distinguish the 2600. It is a 70’s design, like the Moog, so it will have some of the woofiness as opposed to the angularity of the Pro-1, fir example.

[@coliban]

Thank you for this interesting demonstration. As a non-Synth User I now have a much clearer idea of the purposes of this devices and you are right: compared to the price it seems that those Behringer tools are just the best price/performance options and, i have already a keyboard, the 2600 wouldn't hurt too much if I would get such a module for experimenting and so on. Thank you.

[@gasolineandwine]

Being a big fan of the Mini, I'd probably want to own one of those first, I hadn't realized until this video how much Juno potential there truly is. Paraphonic architectures are quite cool, imo. But the low end, and semi-modular patching possibilities on the 2600 are insane, aside from the fact that that semi-modularity can be utilized with the external input.

[@sirnigelcogs]

I still can't decide if I should like Behringer as a company or not.

[@maquettemusic1623]

no. Doesn't mean you don't have to buy their products, but no.

[@maydaygoingdown5602]

Absolutely irrelevent. Always buy gear that you need or just want. Your Music like your Studio doesn't care who made what, neither should you.

[@shabbee]

If it wasn't for Moog or ARP, you wouldn't be discussing this video. Consider that I suppose.

[@mikaeljohansson83]

@@russ254 By that logic you should throw away your Iphone/Ipad/Mac and alot of other things to many to mention really. What you should do is shame them online of course but would you rather pay thru your nose to even get a similar synth? How about the fact that Behringer done alot to revive the modular and analog scene as a whole?

[@longfade]

Seems to be the standard viewpoint of hipsters and retrogrouches, most of whom are not gigging professionally and have never laid hands on a recent behringer product. If you’re a working musician you’re going to love this stuff. Did you even listen to this demo?

[@synkuk]

AWESOME as usual Mr Jack!!! one of my favorite 'tubers' .. loved what you did with the 2600 & polyD .. didnt help me choose :D .. made me want both together :D:D:D:D

[@MarkGardner66Bonnie]

Thank you Jack and Anderton's... I love watching the demo's but my wife is not happy that I keep buying more gear...

[@dinosauria55]

Poly D has the arp & sequencer too. I have both and love them. The Poly D is my go to for quick playability, the 2600 for when I want to mess with the mult and modulation a bit more. Love the vid, great examples of the two synths.

[@ConwayBob]

Hey! Gotta have 'em both! Thanks, Jack, for a SPECTACULAR demo. Beautiful!!!!!

[@fizmo100]

Edit/Update: Damn your eyes, Duxbury, I've just preordered a Blue Marvin and the responsibility for this stupid financial conduct rests squarely on your shoulders! Holy crap, that jam at the end! 😲 Got a Poly D already, but will definitely be adding a BARP 2600 to the mix. First I've heard of the limited edition with the spring reverb... I'm a sucker for that stuff. SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!!! I honestly can't get myself readjusted quickly enough to the transformation Behringer have gone through. When you struggle to decide which bit of Behringer kit you want the most (rather than which bit you want the least, like in the olden days of history) you know the world has changed.

[@measures_of_distance]

probably worth mentioning that the poly D has a step sequencer?

[@TheTerracide]

But mono

[@coolftp]

Wow. This is incredible power of sounds with both together.

[@DJGrazba]

who else laughed out loud about the "meep"

[@mechanicom]

Jack - I genuinely love to hear your keyboard skills and you’re energy. Man could use some of those riffs in my tracks...excellent demo of both. When I have more room in my forthcoming little studio rebuild both are on my list!

[@zombieman81]

I remember back in the late 80s to early 90s when I was still only starting to discover synths the ARP 2600 was something I wished I had... I used a virtual one in a track a few years ago but never thought there would ever be a way of owning something, and now we're in the amazing situation where we're spoiled for choice of clones, both software and hardware...

[@KRAFTWERK2K6]

right? This is why i love Behringer for what they do. Making owning these classsics for real actually become an affordable reality. WITH flawless MIDI integration too.

[@KRAFTWERK2K6]

@D T Day No Minimoog sounds identical because of all the fluctuations of the internal components. You can own several Minimoons from the entire 10 year production range (and even the recent new productions) and they will basically all sound different one way or another. This is why it is so hard to really nail down THE sound of a Minimoog Model D. You can always only get it roughly done. Depending on which model you owned for a whole, your ears will always use THAT model as a sound reference.

[@Donetur]

@Dildo Insaney It sounds great and that’s the relevant thing. Who cares if it is not exactly the same. It sounds great and for a great price as well.

[@mrd1701d]

okay - so you didn't make me decide between which one - so the answer must be 'I get both' - problem solved. Many thanks - awesome demo.

[@surrogatemarker]

Other than the fact they are both from behringer , and controversial, they both sound great..buy both, hook them up together and you have probably the best of both worlds for around $1200.. would be hard for any other all in one analog synth to compete at that price

[@kevingort4926]

Controversial...LOLOLOLOL!

[@blipblip88]

You seem to love the HELL out of all the synths you review, but you're a fun reviewer.

[@jeremythornton433]

I'd like to connect the 2600 to my Moog Grandmother and hear them both at the same time!

[@jeremythornton433]

@Rhizosphere That's what I think as well!

[@13StJimmy]

I have the poly d and absolutely love it but the 2600 would be nice to have along side it

[@MShectman]

Got a little dark there at the end. Haha! I feel you though, man. Great review as always.

[@Massproduce201]

When did we get a table?!?!? Congrats guys cheers!!!!

[@kvmoore1]

The Poly D and 2600 sound killer when played together with all oscillators going. I mean WOW!!!

[@KRAFTWERK2K6]

Got the Poly D when it came out and it was everything i was hoping it to be. Originally i wanted to get a Model-D expander since it was dirt cheap but i was holding back a little and hoping Behringer would release a revision with Keys. And sure enough they DID. Wasn't disappointed. Build-quality is great, sound is AWESOME and it is quite a heavy instrument too. No plasticbomber like the stuff Roland spews out. The keys play fantastic and the additional 4th oscillator is a godsent. I don't really use the paraphonic mode though and often pretend it doesn't exist because i love playing it like a real original MiniMoog Model D. The Sequencer however is still a little enigmatic to me and i really need to always look up tutorials on how to use it. Personally i find the Sequencer of the Korg Minologue a lot easier to handle and fun to play. I am still unsure if i should get the Behringer 2600 too because frankly.. it doesn't really offer anything i need and which i don't already have. But who knows....

[@TooSlowTube]

I finally found the one with Jack Duxbury's origin story.

[@darwinsaye]

Other non- sound related considerations for me are, I will generally always take a synth with a keyboard over one without, and I love a nice wood and metal case. Two downsides of sliders is that they can be finicky to get to stop at a sweet spot, and those grooves are real dust collectors. Also the layout of the 2600 is a real head scratcher for anyone who grew up with the standard layout. And lastly, I could do without sequencers and digital effects on vintage analog synth recreations as well. Glad they didn't add memory storage for presets at least though.

[@Valliant2007]

Just come across this Chanel & it’s sick!! Keep up the great work boys!!

[@marksangster6690]

You’ve sold me on the Poly D! Fantastic. I bought an Odyssey off you guys a few months ago and I’m loving it! (Octave selector is a bit flimsy and wobbly, but the rest is such a trip to play and delve into sound creation.) always wanted an ARP, since hearing one on the Whistle Test in the seventies. I love how they are making these legends accessible to people who don’t have the budget for the vintage gear…….(or a cape and platform boots). Cheers!

[@aftertheendtimes]

I must say that you have come a long way at demoing synths and other equipment, Good job Jack Keep it up man =) Cheers

[@soniklink-WKD4496]

Amazing sound with both in unison Jack!, especially when u filtered down the Poly-D. Epic!! P.s do you often get Copyright Claims for Filter sweeps? Too many do :( #FFS

[@christdolphin69]

god damn that poly d sounds mind blowing. good work and thanks for this comparison. need both now

[@andrewstanworth529]

Clagging em both together is one of the first things I'd do! (In the 12 hours I was messing around!) But seeing jack do it on here shows that I'm not alone! Plug everything into everything & turn it up!

[@geoffk777]

ARP had two filter types because they copied Moog's patented ladder filter design. Moog caught them and they agreed to change it. Unfortunately, the new filter was nowhere near as good. So it's great that you have both, but the earlier Moog-like design is the one to use. Lots of people used the 2600 for performance, like Edgar Winter and Joe Zawinul. But it can be awkward to use on stage with all of the patch cables. It's really better as a studio instrument. The Poly-D lacks some of the ARP's modules (like reverb and sample and Hold) and the patch points. But it's much more intuitive and easier to use live on stage. If you're looking for maximum versatility and don't mind the complexity of the ARP, than you will probably like it. If you want a fat stage instrument that does 90% of what the ARP does, than the Poly-D is a great choice.

[@weedanwine]

"But it can be awkward to use on stage with all of the patch cables" MylarMelodies - Hold my beer...

[@HiLoMusic]

Good they should not be allowed to just steal other tech

[@geoffk777]

@@HiLoMusic I should clarify that it was ARP that did the infringing and not Behrenger, who are using available tech now to build all of their synths.

[@Dudderlyful]

@@HiLoMusic The copyright expires, someone else buys it. Here we are

[@geoffk777]

@@Dudderlyful Actually, in this case it was a patent. US patents expire 20 years from filing or 17 years from grant (whichever is greater). So the Moog patent is long-expired and free to use by anyone. Copyrights last for life of the author or 100 years, so you need to be careful about those.

[@rhopsutorius]

Great demo. Loved it. I also love the sounds! Why don't they make 61, or 73 key synths like this?

[@NathanChisholm041]

Too bloody big thats why!

[@SuperChaoticus]

Ordered the 2600 about a month ago, and the wait is killing me. But now I'm thinking a Poly D might be a nice addition. Too many toys, not enough cash.

[@pauljeavons8878]

My only tip for demoing the gear is don't assume that everybody wants ballsy synths. The sounds with all those oscillators firing will kill a music composition completely. It's the subtlety of tone from analog synths that are good. Particularly in the higher freqs with ring mod and other added waves it sounds much better than VA. If you want to hear the arp2600 sing with beautiful tones. Use the sine wave as bass underlying tone. Make use of the ring mod at the vca as this can bypass the filter. Use filter resonance to create overtones. Play around with the osc freqs. The secret of the arp2600 is the ability to bypass the filter with what you want direct.

[@lunalangton5776]

lol you've got a bit of VCO2 FM (rightmost green slider in filter section) going on when you're sweeping the 2600 filter, you can see the slider's up a little bit. Noticed it didn't sound like my 2600 right in front of me, had to look close, now I can replicate it. Also, using three oscillators maxed out on the 2600 produces some distortion, the intermodulation gets more obvious when you tune the oscillators some interval apart. Keep them around 75% if you want to avoid that. Of course both these things are musical, but just want everyone to be aware :)

[@michaelwilde2209]

Nice presentation,you are amazing to watch

[@theedxqboi]

I'd say, besides the CAT, the 2600 is the best mono/ duo synth out there. Bar none. I love the oscillators, I love the filter. I love the extras. Primo synth. Up there on top with my favorites (DX7, Microwave XT).

[@KingCrimson82]

watched tons of videos and i share your opinion, the ARPs can be listened to in action on early genesis, doing an outstanding job, they are dialed into rock faster than the moog, but i gonna get the poly d , since i want pads for my rock and metal and i prefer the 70s over the 80s sound, the dreamier it gets the better.

[@mass-1128]

Not many people know this, but Behringer got Rob Keeble on board to help them build the 2600! 😊

[@oldowl4290]

I probably won't get a reply but I'd love to download and sample/slice some of the stuff in this video. Are you guys ok with that?

[@wolfpackpresets]

Great demo, Jack! ✌️

[@lillithsrevenge662]

is the digital hiss a youtube thing? i hear it alot on so many synth demos... is that the instruments fault? or the capture equipment used?... admittedly here im assuming the hiss is from their mic setup maybe? but idk, i heard it during the audio demo too. amazing video content btw, im just a moron tbh, but the hiss always got to me on everything! (i dont mean this a criticism, even if that's what it sounds like...) im just wondering what the hiss is? again thanks for the video, it was really entertaining/interesting. (side note i notice it on some of my equipment too and its really unnerving to me personally, probably my ND mind or some nonsense)

[@zm6658]

that outro was absolutely outstanding

[@obwanz1921]

Bette Widdler, Widdler on the roof! GREAT PLAYING JACK!!

[@gamma_noize]

03:04 They're NOT both semi modular... Only the 2600 is. Having a pre-patched signal flow is called a "normalized topology". The Poly D is a regular normalized synth following the classic east coast (Moog) architecture. Semi modular would mean, you can break signals out of the regular signal flow and can patch them to another point, that's not originally connected to this source, thereby altering the topology of the synth, like you can on the 2600, but can't on the Poly D. The Poly Ds four CV inputs and outputs don't make it "semi modular", as you can't alter the topology of the synth with them. Barely three minutes in and you already misinform your customers...

[@SuchaDoofus]

Bad day at the office Mrs Grumpy? ;-)

[@gamma_noize]

​@@SuchaDoofus Nah... I get pissed off, when sales people, who're supposed to be pros or at least intermediates in their field, don't even know the basics. Then i just get feeling, they'd rip me off, instead of consulting me and sell me what i really want/need. And i especially dislike Jack. He always acts so over the top, but often knows jack shit... (Pun not intended) A bit more professionalism would go a long way in a video that's basically an advert.

[@garyhazelton3307]

You are going to grow into the 2600 via experiments with those little cables, grasshopper. I wish these remakes would be 100% compatible with modern modular control voltages. Behringer and Korg missed an opportunity there. I see myself also affording a special utility or two to switch from modern modular 0-10V to remake +/-10V to control.

[@geerhoar]

The 2600 is pretty much Eurorack compatible. There are three outputs at +14V that will need attenuation, and when you are gating both envelopes through the S&H input on the AR envelope section, the threshold increases to +6V (gating them separately is +5 and +4V inputs).

[@MarcoPolux]

I came here to check the Arp 2600 but that PolyD maybe will come along for the ride too. Even though I said NO MORE MONO SYNHTS... but I mean, that Arp 2600 is a must, and that PolyD.... too! at least I am keeping my word with the PolyD, that´s not a Mono synth.

[@ZenMountain]

Great, thanks!

[@spazkong]

The Poly D is the most enjoyable synth I have ever owned. I average a synth for every year and getting on a bit!

[@spazkong]

@David Ryan Funny. In the 80's we couldn't wait to get our hands on a real sounding piano! It's gone the other way entirely. I started in 1986 with a portable Yamaha FM keyboard. Had tons of digital and analogue synths. I could never afford a Moog Mini so, the Poly D is just a blessing. A synth rabbit hole if you will.

[@tommyfoley]

Ya, Jack wit da thickened filta sveeps.

[@Mark_Ocain]

At these prices, you should choose both!! (oh god I'm sounding like Danish Pete LOL). They both sound awesome. Lots of hate for Behringer out there...not me, I love 'em for putting this gear where I can get at it :-) Man, the sound of these together make my teeth wiggle LOL

[@andrewverran3498]

PolyD all day long. At the end of the day the 2600 would be your next buy.

[@pacoestelles-narwhalsound75]

Once again, a great demo!

[@georgeray3492]

First time I've heard the Poly D chorus. Definitely headphone worthy. I was sold on the 2600, but now I think Jack's idea of the two together is the winning move. Excellent solo to close out the video.

[@KRAFTWERK2K6]

Oh yeah it really gives the Poly D the proper stereo spread and i often use it just because of that. When you send it through a reverb it gets even better.

[@onemanband3579]

I don't know, you tell me.

[@g3cd]

The best analogue synth for under $600 would be the Dave Smith Toraiz AS-1. Combine it with a Faderfox PC4 and you got a knob-per-function synth 1/4 the size of the Behringer monoliths that will outlast the Behringers by decades.

[@mark35mi]

I cried at your MIP. Love it!

[@raulgama]

What about Arp 2600 + Poly D + Monopoly sounding together?? 🤣

[@andersjeppsson8499]

Wicked sounds around 17 min!

[@mack_solo]

18:29 - demoing two analogue synths - excellent. going off on a tangent at one's own dad - priceless! :D

[@OtterLakeFlutes]

Exactly what I was wondering, because I do not have money to buy both, really. This is a tossup (for like a year probably). Thank you!!!!

[@michaelrutchik9906]

Always enjoy your humor, but honestly before today I figured you for a genuine buffoon. But you’ve got chops for sure! And even more impressive, you make that poly D sound better than any of the dozens of videos I’ve seen of the Moog One. I have Behringer’s a model D and you make me want to take it out of the closet and push it to its limits. Very Nice demo. Thank you!

[@MakingMadBeats]

Jack a.k.a. "Mr. Fiddely Widdely" @ it, again 💥💥💥!!!

[@deadgrafixcom]

Hotdamn that 2600 sub bass is massive!!

[@damnthatsweak]

I picked up on some daddy issues. You enjoy those synths my boy, you enjoy them without guilt or shame!!

[@dictabeat]

Buy both for your pops and tell him "we're even now" Jack. That oughta fix things.

[@0VRLNDR]

Jack is a legend.

[@ednasdiscomachine6049]

Yeah, can't be doing Behringer stuff... #swing. I have, however, ordered a KORG 2600M though (from Andertons as it happens). Also, Korg supports the Alan R. Pearlman Foundation.

[@mikaeljohansson83]

Great one Jack as always👍 I do have one serious consideration though! Where is all the background clicking when you play coming from? Ok cancel that it's my frickin computer that's acting up or maybe Firefox🤬

[@batboy07]

Jack’s arms though....

[@seventhhe4ven]

I feel this video is a little biased. I tried to find a section which talks in any kind of detail about the 2600, but at any point that I dropped in it was all about the Poly D

[@danf4236]

I love my Poly D, but I hardly ever use it in para mode. Something about it just isn't as inspiring to play as it is in monophonic mode.

[@weedanwine]

Love the jam at the end, the synths sounds morphing into one another are like an aural metaphor of baby-faced Jack turning into beardy Jack before our very eyes.

[@MikkelGrumBovin]

All fffffff RIGHT ! Jack´s the BEST !

[@7thhouserecords437]

How did you connect the audio out of the Poly D to the 2600?

[@dstrats]

Amazing demo! How do you make the keyboard of the PolyD work for the 2600?

[@kimdiez2681]

MIDI.

[@afterimg3120]

whats that little glitch at 11:47? :D

[@alveydoug]

Don’t forget to order patch cables with your 2600 (it doesn’t come with any); colors are a good thing. No MIDI cables either. The power adapter looks like a weak link. I have a Blue Marvin , with the Spring Reverb. Unless you’re old (like me), you’ll be satisfied with the standard 2600’s “quieter” Digital Reverb.

[@ogasi1798]

sick vid champ, sick :-)

[@shayneoneill1506]

Was that opening solo from Frank Zappa. I swear I recognize it but not sure where. Also, the way I have heard these two synths described is that with the Minimoogs, the synth will naturally guide you to new sounds, whereas with a 2600 you'll have a sound in your mind and the synth *will* be able to repliclate it. You need a bit of planning with the 2600, but its possibilities are infinite. Whilst a Minimoog might be a bit more limited but its an excellent synth for just exploring and tweaking to see what happens.

[@chrisfisher6943]

You should eat that question.

[@joshuabpolys]

Hi. There’s midi i/o/t somewhere on that 2600 right? Thx for the great video’s!

[@fusionistaaaa]

Have you played with the Cat yet from Behringer? If so, how do you like it, compared to Odyssey and Model D?

[@davidmartin123]

Both sounded great, but I coulda a little more sawtooth. I gotta have that sawtooth, baby! I got a fever, and the only prescription is more sawtooth!

[@CheshireMoonBand]

The problem I have with all the Behringer synths. They are marvelous recreations of the original units, but are still grounded in the time they came from. So no saving sounds. I saw a lot of bands who used these, and things like them, in the 70s, and I don't want a flip book of setups sitting next to my synth. I don't want to setup every patch every time I want to use it. Modernize them just a little, and I'll buy them.

[@vaiman7777]

It's half of the fun. Relying on patches isn't helpful. You can dial a basic sound in within seconds, then it's just FX, filters etc. Same as with modern synths.

[@andewprod]

its about the fun mate! I personally enjoy that every patch is unique, and if I have a patch I want to use for future projects I make a video about every patch cable and knob that is importat to it and this way I feel I am creative! And when I patch up this exact patch again I find out that If I turn that knob a little more to the right, it sounds even better.. Of course thats not for everyone, in that case I just recommend using a plug-in synthesizers with a midi controller (so you still have that "knob feel") or buy synths that are able to save presets.. but I tell you, its a totally different workflow! In addition, most Behringer synths have the option to connect it with eurorack.. where presets are basicly impossible because you use real-life cables. As I also build modules (aka synths) myself its a mess to try to save those values.. because in analog synths we are talking about reallife electrons and voltages that interact with each other thanks to wires, resistors, capacitors etc and making them change their values with a (needed) digital signal is very painful and difficult to acomplish.. Greetings!

[@CheshireMoonBand]

@@andewprod For me, I'm a songwriter first, instrumentalist second. When we play live, I don't want to have to make a bunch of changes, I want the sounds to be there. That said, as soon as I can find a Korg Odyssey module, I'm getting it.

[@alainszyller615]

They appear to me as very different machines, and what about DeepMind 12, Odyssey and MonoPoly ?

[@matiascova]

this was great! both FTW

[@DoctorJRx]

got me a gray meanie baby !!! yes it does satisfy my modular itch !!

[@tylon2999]

My only Behringer purchase was a cable tester and I had to return it because it didn't work. I would buy from them if they had something I wanted such as a table top fx sampler like the Pioneer Remix 1000 or Korg KP3 ,but no way would I risk $600.

[@BritishBeachcomber]

I use and love Behringer gear but I hate the way their clones are so small that the controls are hard to use. I'd happily pay $100 more for full size.