Ben & Camille Shot Down Elaine's Arguments in UNSEALED Motions

[@BlackBeltBarrister]

Example Case Analysis by Alan Robertshaw Esq. and me: kzbin.info/www/bejne/haXPdJ6ud8itgrM

[@annakarenina3188]

Oh gods Daniel what is this new fangled technology pdf computer witchcraft stuff?! I know our courts have gone/are going paperless, but I so prefer my bundles to be paper: can scrawl all over and make notes on, and Post-It notes and then my own pro-forma for tribunal questions. How on earth do you cope without pen/paper copies? 💜💜

[@annakarenina3188]

Ps... On serious note, may be worth seeing if Colonel Kurtz can do a double-up / triple-up with you, herself and maybe Mr Robertshaw.... She's an academic (post doc) in media, and she's been following JD case from start, plus the much more wild Marilyn Manson case. I was wondering if doing a cross-channel thing, where she brings in the knowledge she has from Manson re: JD and how it may be useful information re: the UK trial (as in VA they kept referencing Manson almost every day, before he filed to sue Evan Rachel Wood and Illma Gore). Then also take hypothetical counterparts of ERW and MM for the UK: like if ERW & MM were in the UK, which laws would come into play with both, and therefore how people here in similar bizarre situations (I've no presumption of guilt or innocence before the trial obviously, but the evidence appears at this stage to be in Manson's favour).... How people in such circumstances in the UK could potentially fight such a case (with all the caveats of not legal advice). I just think it'd be an interesting hypothetical exercise, possibly illuminate some evidence about JD and things useful for UK re-opening, as he was at events that AH claims violence took place..... And cross seed audience to each others channels..... She's meticulous, and follows the evidence, and is a really sweet and smart woman who was fans of neither, but believes in justice.

[@annakarenina3188]

Finishing watching this video -- yes, speak to Colonel Kurtz, as these actions in liminey bring in aspects of the Manson case..... It's wild, strongly parallels, theres a journalism source saying AH & ERW co-conspired..... But this time, has strong evidence.

[@user-fc8qg9vx8t]

I noticed in the introduction and summary portion, regarding Heard’s “Supplemental Plea in Bar by Letter Opinion and Order,” has a date of August 17, 2022. Is that a deadline for the plea, or is it an error? If it is an error on the date e.g. it should have read August 17, 2021; can Heard’s team use this as another attempt to get this case overturned?

[@sabrinaotterson446]

@@annakarenina3188 y

[@aprilfox1057]

Blaming blaming blaming, no accountability. Sadly, U.K. trial was a sham.

[@ladyhawk7483]

Heard was a witness not a party so it should never be allowed. Uk trial needs serious attention

[@Jennifermcintyre]

That case makes the UK justice system look like a joke… how was that judge allowed to preside over a case with countless conflicts of interest!!

[@iluvdissheet]

I dont think it was a sham....the judge just believed Amber. If anything, that specific judge should be questioned, not the entire system.

[@Whytheheckmustthisbelong]

It really was

[@Whytheheckmustthisbelong]

@@iluvdissheet the judge was biased enough to ignore all the evidence from Johnny and just takes it from one side

[@spymaine89]

nothing presented to the jury could be more powerful than heard herself. on the stand she presented an evil guilty manifestation. , the verdict was written on her face.

[@alpine_newt]

Sadly for her, it also showed casting directors just how poor of an actress she is.

[@treetrout3987]

Well put.

[@chainreaction1703]

@@alpine_newt lmao

[@andreacarter8202]

Heards own words brought her down.

[@Jesssssss93]

@@alpine_newt “Excuse me? I got that role by auditioning” 🤪😂

[@ThankfulQue]

Thank you, Andrea Burkhart and those who funded the acquisition.

[@lilatoff]

Absolutely. She did an amazing thing in obtaining and sharing these documents.

[@alabamatrixie7379]

The people funded it and the remaining moneys donated to children's hospital! Awesome!

[@montanabowlady5896]

I already signed the petition and URGE others who believe that JD should have the UK JUDGEMENT reheard to PLEASE PLEASE sign the petition found under description of this stream.

[@musestudio7075]

Thanks for mentioning this. I signed it too, but it needs a lot more signatures and I think it will get them if more people knew about it. There are 4 other important petitions which got a ton of signatures at first but stalled after the trial: "Remove Amber Heard as ACLU Ambassador of Women’s Rights", "Remove Amber Heard from Aquaman 2", "Amber Heard does NOT deserve to play Mera in the next Aquaman film", and, "Remove Amber Heard as L'Oreal Spokesperson". Please sign and share these also.

[@msjannd4]

Done. 😉

[@sambas9257]

The petition for removing Amber Heard from Aquama reached 4.6 milions. It didn't have any consequencies.Warner Bros still continues to protect her role and position.Another trial in UK is useless if people doesn't understand why he lost. In a new trial it will happen the same. Is it possible that the judge chosen for the past trial had so strict connections with The Sun?How could it be prevented the next judge will not have the same connections?

[@Slitheringpeanut]

Not going to happen, the judge in that case has to sign off on having it reheard, which would imply that his own judgement was wrong. Worse, it's clear that he was compromised from the word go. His son for example worked with the Sun article writer when they both worked for the affiliated radio station. The Judge's WIFE hosted a party that both Heard and her UK lawyer attended earlier. That judgement should be overturned and that judge should be shown the way to jail, but it won't happen.

[@aloha_oe311]

Where do I sign?? Is there a link.. The Uk trial was indeed very biased.

[@vickis2170]

The part of her already saying a smear campaign was going on it is utter BS. Most of us had no clue who the hell she was until this trial she truly isn't as remarkable as she thinks she is. And the campaign she and her minions have done to JD and his team is ridiculous. Any smear campaign was her and her team against JD. She lied and hoped not to be caught period. Thank you so much for your videos between you and others we get a true read on all of this.

[@aloha_oe311]

Which is funny because a “smear campaign” is exactly what she started in the first place to destroy Depp. It just so happen that the table have turned to her, and she’s calling out that same issue just because it’s happening to her now.. What a dumbo.

[@Boundwithflame23]

Right? There was a smear campaign going on. Just not against her lmao

[@charzemc]

The smear campaign has been perpetrated by heard against Johnny Depp. All the YT channels that are currently being attacked by Richie Albertini, are the truth tellers & they are using a reused material excuse, not harrassment. Richie Albertini has also implicated AH in this harrassment & attacks on content creators.

[@juliad.6372]

Actually it is very clear..,she got attention by simply being with JD..plus she p,aged some roles...which obviously went to her head..unable to see reality...therefore planned a lot of false stories.. in her mind were only succes for her... Little did she know about self...and now reality manifests in her face..Yet she continues the lies... All her doings really...If she would be rational..then would reorganize her life...stop demanding money for which she has not worked..,sadly this is not the case.. I am confident of judicial system..she 'll be handled accordingly..

[@leasashaver2263]

I’m the same as you. I had no idea who she was.

[@suedyett2988]

The woman and her pals were waiting for JD to get home to jump him and I feel, to cause serious harm. The police came too soon…they did not expect them to get there that quickly. Bff’s don’t hide in a closet or another area of the home, unless you are up to no good. She told the police that they didn’t mean to call the police the 2nd time…. The male friend tried to stop the police from coming into the home, but the officers strongly (respectfully) came into the home. AH told the police that she was fine and didn’t need the police. Now make me believe that this woman wasn’t up to something.

[@bonnieabrs1003]

IMHO I believe ah & cohorts planned to harm JD. It became plan 1 when she found she wasn’t in his will & he wanted a post nuptial agreement.

[@goldenautumn3073]

This entire sideshow has simply beggared belief because what really is the truth has constantly been confirmed over and again. The fact that almost violent dissatisfaction and protest has been permitted to continue, especially publicly, on the part of the loser, is even harder to believe. Shouldn't have been allowed or tolerated - it's about time a level of decency and respect was brought back into this equation and the true wrongdoer appropriately punished under law.

[@cbh9298]

JD is very lucky to be alive!

[@JanNan]

@@cbh9298 I have said this all along, if JD had not got away from this situation, I truly believe we would have been watching a totally different trial, I put AH on the same parr as Jodie Arias, with AH money and fame, Jodie, if she couldn't have him no one would. RIP Travis Alexander 🙏 😢

[@stephanypasnin1474]

Im no johnny depp fan but her accusations were so ridiculous it wasnt hard to see who the abuser was.

[@SwissMiss138]

I appreciate the deeper dive into the trial. It’s like watching all the credits after a movie and then getting another small clip payoff at the end!

[@kimc.3104]

Never going to die lol

[@charzemc]

That's called a post credit scene.

[@SwissMiss138]

@@charzemc 👍🏼

[@kateeast7352]

How can Elaine show such a disrespect for the law as she showed to this Court and still be allowed to practice.She disregarded the judges motions on quite a few rules and out and out lied on things not meant to be in evidence.

[@sarahlang2119]

I know right!

[@goldenautumn3073]

Totally correct. They were PATHETIC.

[@tonyhawk123]

Desperate client attracted a desperate lawyer. Who in turn paid for desperate expert witnesses. When you've got Amber Heard as a client, desperation is dialled up to 11.

[@hevchip741]

I can't believe Elaine and Amber mentioned the UK case more than once. Elaine was treading on thin ice making accusations against many witnesses. Thanks for mentioning the JD appeal.

[@zephyrbear]

It seems as though AH and Elaine were expecting as easy a ride as the UK trial in Virginia and they were totally unprepared for Judge Azcarate and Ben Chew & Co throwing that plan into complete disarray! Try as she might, Elaine totally failed to make any reference to the UK trial or its diabolical verdict thanks to the relentless, valid objections raised by Camille Vasquez until she’d been utterly ground into the floor with nothing to come back with. If anyone is interested, @EmilyDBaker has also done the first one of these looks at the unsealed documents (she’ll be doing the next one on Tuesday) where she has covered those “sealed” UK files that you can’t mention.

[@Julia-uh4li]

Emily got them from Andrea! Yes, Andrea is our champion!! 💙

[@mightymidas2021]

Totally unprepared for an unbias judge unlike the UK judge

[@wittnessbe_judged8723]

Never stop helping us to understand the laws in the UK and giving us knowledge you're teaching many people things that they did not know I enjoy every single one of your videos and I watch them all the way to the end

[@annemoncrieff3875]

English law. Scots law is different, thank goodness

[@mightymidas2021]

English courts are a joke , utter pomp and performance, they are all in each other's pockets and not impartial.

[@eightysea3780]

Is Elaine a manipulative shyster, a terrible lawyer, or just dumb? I've heard her say countless times now "We already won in UK" when they weren't even part of the case except as a witness. If I can figure out that is not the same, what in the world is Elaine's excuse?

[@MsJacobowski]

She clearly is a shyster. She even lied to the court for AH, when she said AH had paid for her lawyers, as if she didn't know the insurance was footing her bill. There was an insurance person sitting right behind her in the first row throughout the whole trial for Gods sake and Elaine still shamelessly lied!

[@johnsensebe3153]

I think all three. She engages in shady tactics to make up for the fact that she isn't a competent lawyer, because she's dumb.

[@deang5622]

Lawyers are educated intelligent people, so I would say potentially the first two only.

[@deang5622]

She can say it as often as she likes, she did not win in the UK. She was neither the plaintiff or defendant.

[@johnsensebe3153]

@@deang5622 You'd think that, wouldn't you?

[@mindyrolston3915]

They were also two different cases JD was suing the sun over a title and the UK. Johnny sued Amber her over her written op-ed in the United States they're two different things completely

[@ianmckinney3446]

The jury used the title in Virginia

[@Irene-xs9pc]

@@ianmckinney3446 the uk trial was Johnny Depp against Dan Wooton who worked for the sun rag, who wrote a piece calling out JK Rowling, headline has Rowling gone potty allowing Johnny Depp a wife beater to the role in the film amazing beast’s

[@ianmckinney3446]

@@Irene-xs9pc yes and in Virginia the jury used the title...

[@ElderNewt]

Amber: Blame everyone! Amber's Lawyers: Everyone? Amber: EVERYONE ! ! !

[@chainreaction1703]

Such as Professional :)

[@johnsensebe3153]

You have to imagine Heard delivering those lines like Gary Oldman in _The Professional,_ which is admittedly hard because Oldman is a *much* better actor.

[@emma9348]

Quoting gary oldman in leon!! Lol

[@suedyett2988]

The judge wouldn’t let JD present much of anything. He would get shut down every time he tried to bring forth evidence.

[@linusgustafsson2629]

That is my favorite part of the justice system. "Facts that prove your argument? Nah, we can't include that." Why would any court ever deny evidence? It shouldn't even be valid to claim "It is too late" or "This only proves the other part is a patological liar and doesn't prove that they lied about the case". All things that are relevant to find the truth should be presented and included.

[@cherilogan8761]

I learn something new every single video, heard/Depp trial has so many examples for learning opportunities, it's crazy and I love your breakdowns. Keep it real and keep up the great work.

[@farzanamiah7737]

Signed and sent petition to friends and family thanks Daniel love your videos

[@100Mickl]

They kept mentioning it throughout - Elaine is a dirty player

[@pitchsydneyguy4554]

This elderly woman lawyer Elaine should be disbarred for her lack of integrity, honesty, respect, rudeness to court and juries and Johnny Depp!

[@patriciamaartens1]

Just signed the petition. Come on everybody let's get this done.

[@dawndiamond9715]

Where is the petition still looking for it

[@Julia-uh4li]

@@dawndiamond9715 In Daniels description. Just scroll down until you see the highlighted link called The Petition.

[@hellypoppy5739]

Absolutely clear AH & her team thought they’d win. They were unprepared in large part & the only winners were their bank balances, $6 million fees thus far I believe (paid for by insurance cover)

[@jameswells9403]

Yeah, even at the verdict she is smirking. Until the verdict is read and you can see her breathing getting shallow...

[@julielevinge266]

They should have won,AH Is her own worst enemy. If she hadn’t come up with all that bs about terrible SA & just said that during arguments Depp had hit her? Even if she admitted hitting him back she still could have won. But her allegations with absolutely no collaborating medical evidence is just inconceivable.

[@MrNorker77]

As I understand it it was 6 million in fees before the trial started, so it's likely to be higher then the judgement (as trial is what usually is the expensive part)

[@charzemc]

The insurance company is now suing her for their money back since she was found to be malicious.

[@thekitowl]

@@charzemc go watch the real Laura B it’s a lot more complicated.

[@TheSiriusEnigma]

As a - witness - in the UK trial. AH was NOT subjected to discovery (disclosure). Meaning, she lied and JD was not allowed to prove she did. The UK judge based his judgment on the fact that “someone who donate 7 millions to charity is a credible witness.”

[@arbiter1]

Even after the fact the court knew she lied in AU and plead guilty to perjury.

[@TheSiriusEnigma]

@@arbiter1 well. While you are at it, the UK judge completely removed/dismiss an uncontested expert witness testimony because it didn’t fit his narrative. The police officer specifically trained for DV situations that testified that there was no sign of DV when he inspected the scene.

[@deang5622]

That is not the meaning of discovery or disclosure! These two are different concepts.

[@deang5622]

She was a witness in the UK case, a witness for the defence and she is allowed to be cross examined by counsel for the plaintiff to determine the veracity of her evidence. Now, I don't know if she was cross examined or how well it was done, but ordinarily it is permitted.

[@TheSiriusEnigma]

@@deang5622 my understanding is that in the UK, a witness is not subjected to discovery unless the judge specifically allows it. And he didn’t. How do you cross examine a liar? A professional actor? If the only thing you can have is his/her words? “Did you give 3.5 million to the charity?” “Yes.” “You Honour, we would like to check if it’s true.” “No.” Pretty much described what happened.

[@Fredaslee]

The UK trial was a disgrace. The judge should have recused himself. I tried to sign the petition but it would not send an e:mail to confirm my signature, several times!

[@paulareynolds4493]

I'm still very interested in hearing things about this case. Especially now with what has been released so please continue. If people don't want to hear it they can turn their headphones off LOL.

[@elizabeth84266]

Incredibly Average (you tuber) has never seen before footage of her original deposition that she thought would never be seen and it’s…. Wow… you should definitely check it out!

[@msjannd4]

👏👏👏😉

[@vikkicason9241]

Did you watch the trial? This is CRAZY! I was not a JD fan and sadly tuned in to see how he could wiggle his way out of this. I know I just assumed bc the whole world and mainstream media sided with her.....he was likely guilty. I then realized he was describing events I had lived (although NEVER physical) and she is much like the man I was married to for 15 years. Thank God it was a much smaller scale. She will not give up....I think she truly has told the lie so many times.....she believes it.

[@TheTyforseth]

It's very interesting that her own lawyers knew from the start that she was so fucked that they had to start making up conspiracy theories about how everyone that didn't like Ms. Turd was a bot. Her legal team is the kind of "yes man" legal team that Bruce Rivers brought up when he analyzed what Andrew Tate wants in a lawyer. They almost certainly know she did some illegal shit, and her mentality is of course 'I don't talk to lawyers to hear about laws, I just want you to get me out of this shit,' to paraphrase Tate. There's a saying I thought of when I was watching this whole trial play out: "a lawyer is only as good as their client." Her legal team is comprised of some real scumbags, and they all act exactly like her.

[@shareenmasher4833]

My feelings exactly

[@Jetblast01]

Elaine is definitely that. Here I thought Rottenburn was shady, but he seemed to just do it for the job then moved on. Elaine on the otherhand, her "15-minutes of fame" was getting to her head too much.

[@dodosmamma1692]

Birds of a feather and all that……

[@jeannettedodge5886]

Totally agree 👍

[@reginafetty6374]

@@Jetblast01 I really thought that if Rottenborn didn't have Elaine, he would have had a better job defending her. Elaine seemed to undermind the case. Elaine questions, brought up answers, that ended up being used against AH. I think she would have still lost but I think it would have been less of the fiasco it was. Elaine accused everyone for AH actions, but AH. And the constant 15 minutes of fame to discredit them instead of working the case with facts was just bs.

[@dynomitenash8970]

Intuitively I sort of knew that the info from the UK really didn't have a dog in this fight here in the United States. Why would an American legal team even attempt to press a ruling from an entirely different country into a case they're working on here? It's as if AH's attorneys think the UK's laws sets some type of precedence in the USA? Good grief, it sounds like they got their law degrees out of a box of Cracker Jacks!

[@skipd9164]

The U.K. trial was a planned event with the outcome predetermined. The judge and his family's association with the people involved he should of let another judge hear it. The U.K. corruption would not be exposed except JD proved AH is a fraud. This was the big nail in the coffin for men. It's not over other women are in line

[@deang5622]

The judgement in a UK court is an opinion which is derived from the evidence and testimony presented before the court. And that judgement can be wrong. So it would be entirely inappropriate for a court in another country to rely on that derived opinion: the US should make its own mind up fully based on the facts and only the facts presented before it. There is also a fundamental difference in libel laws in the UK and US where in the US malice needs to be present in an act of libel for a libel claim to be upheld by the US court. That is not the case in the UK . So because of the different laws in the two countries, even if presented with the same same evidence and testimony in the trial, the courts may have to come to a different outcome in order to comply with their respective laws.

[@workerdroid290]

Because they are so desperate to fortify their false claims, and the UK trial was a win for them. The UK trial looks very dubious to me, leaning toward corrupt conduct. Her evidence was just accepted, without rebuttal. She is a clever liar, but it’s all come undone now. I hope the UK trial is set aside

[@ohsuzyq5297]

AH Team wanted to bring up the UK Judgement because the AH Team did not have a csae, no credible witnesses or evidence. The unsealed documents from the VA trial are revealing how shady elaine was before and during the trial. Fortunately, the JD Team is so brilliant.

[@goldenautumn3073]

You bet. Obviously GROSSLY inexperienced - better off as commercial or property lawyers imo.

[@nounae7409]

Please know dear Barrister That I love all your videos. Your approach and demeanor as well as knowledge and professionalism are amazing. Always enriching and informative to listen to you!!!

[@brendaseager7371]

I am signing this ! Depp had no chance of winning this trial because of lies and conflict!

[@cyankirkpatrick5194]

F. Lee Bailey was once a good lawyer but greed and arrogance got in the way of his hindsight and it was his undoing. And it will happen to Eliane as well.

[@andreacarter8202]

But F. Lee Bailey was smart. Elaine certainly is not.

[@patriciarockwell2227]

OH GOD, Don't put Elaine even in the same category as F. Lee Bailey....smh

[@mandypratt5787]

Really good to hear your description on the things that have gone on behind the scenes prior to court session. It's very sad to hear the arguements from AH in regards to everything is somebody else's fault and not hers. It seems to show her mentality that she is a perfect person and everyone else isn't...

[@vicki4936]

I appreciate your breakdowns. They are very thorough and easy to understand. YES, I'm still interested as these unsealed docs are very relevant, especially for the appeal. TY @BlackBeltBarrister

[@grmmyantju8369]

Please keep doing a great job. I love the break down.

[@zenamen5221]

Thank you for presenting information in a calm, dignified, and highly informative way. It's so needed.

[@Jooniebug]

Amber and Elaine blaming EVERYONE BUT Amber. What a joke. Am surprised they didn't blame aliens from another planet because the LIES Amber told without shaking or stuttering were definitely out of this world. Thanks as always for breaking this down for us this is very useful.

[@johnsensebe3153]

It was all due to sunspots.

[@girlinspired]

Thanks for all of the continual updates on this fascinating case. Please continue with your analyses and insights, very much appreciated ❤️

[@cyankirkpatrick5194]

I'll sign the petition for Johnny,it's taken care of.

[@sandyball7954]

I really enjoy your channel and the professional way it’s presented. Thank you for the information and all your hard work!

[@shelly7909]

I think that it’s very important to people as your self exsplaning difficult or different subjects from helping us all to learn and brake things down into a way that we can understand and having your opinions , taking your time and respect while still upholding the law is a blessing, so thank you 🙏 from us all and especially for are children who will be inspired to be hopefully a solicitor or barrister as your self my daughter is. A self taught artist and my niece is doing drama and law light house has been very helpful to me,xx

[@nilzagarcia6341]

Great information. Thank you for sharing. Your conversations have really helped clear lots of legal questions I’ve had regarding some of the rulings, introduction of evidence as well as inadmissible evidence and so on. Thank you!

[@merrly20]

Thank you for sharing this video with us I’m glad you are helping us understand the legal jargon behind what is going on with this case and for those of us who are not lawyers thank you for helping us understand what is going on legally speaking

[@debrastolp5970]

Love your channel!!! Thanx for your breakdowns of the unsealed documents. Plus I am drawn to anything ‘UK’ originally stemming from ALL things ‘RIk Mayall’, whom I adore. So the UK laws and the trail, along with anything else you might share, are completely captivating!! However you decide to make future videos as you described at the end of this one, I’m in!!!

[@patriciatreslove146]

Please keep us up to date on this case, especially these documents which we would never understand without explanation.

[@tamsin1975]

I love your videos and look forward to how clear, factual and easy to listen to. What you see is what you get. I hope you continue to cover this case for however long is needed. Yes yes more lives on the subjects you are suggesting please ❤️

[@BlackBeltBarrister]

I appreciate that, Thank you 😊 🙏 !

[@m0L3ify]

It's crazy the lengths Elaine went to to try and sway the jury, bribe the jury, etc., and they still lost because nothing could change how bad a client Amber was.

[@MissAndDav]

Elaine even outright lied to the jury in her summing up! Elaine told them that AH had not been able to pay her pledges to the charities "because she had paid 6 million in legal fees" and yet Elaine knew that her legal fees were paid by AHs insurance!

[@internetpolification]

@@MissAndDav I mean…why no repercussions for Elaine? I just don’t get it

[@godzilla928]

@@internetpolification why? because who gonna pay for another trial, collecting evidence and putting stuff together and then begin the litigation? who gonna do that and why? to 'trivial' to become a serious subject for another proceedings or sth

[@ronaldoago-go5907]

@@godzilla928 coz if shes not called out on it it validates lying and cheating by lawyers.

[@jeanniem2377]

I appreciate your time explaining the legal aspects of the trial. I have been learning so much, and I thank you for it.

[@Julia-uh4li]

Thank you Daniel, I for one, appreciate your insight with these unsealed court records. I look forward to all the new reveals to come & I'm learning a lot from you. Hope you and the Mrs have a good week ahead.

[@reneebarger5194]

Why wouldn’t the Sun newspaper sue AH for providing false & fraudulent information for their articles opening a window for liability?

[@thekitowl]

They don’t care.

[@barbaramcmillan3835]

They definitely don't car, they sold s lot of papers at JD's expense. They're not about to admit that !

[@barb6525]

I wanted to give AHs team the benefit of doubt during the trial, as I found it hard to believe that anyone could act like they did with intention. I was wrong 🤦‍♀️ They do know exactly what they are doing, and they couldn't care less if it is totally out of order. I hope you continue to do these videos as it is just as interresting to have your legal perspective on this case, as well as the peek behind the curtains of the trial. Thank you for all the effort you put in to make it available and understandable to us ❤️

[@d.jensen5153]

I was fascinated by your presentation and discussion of these pretrial submissions! What fascinating perspective they offer in light of what followed!

[@michelleanderson8370]

I find your explanation of how the law effects these items..or how the items are effected by the law...very helpful in understanding the rules of evidence so I thank you for taking the time to share with those of us that enjoy this

[@hoptoit5910]

Most of us appreciate you covering this case. Those that don’t need not watch. I don’t understand why people complain and think they should have control over what the content creator puts out. Thank you for all you share.

[@Spacey7]

Of course it's not over & I think it's good to hear what is going on still in this case.

[@donnachampion3169]

Thankyou BBB for helping us understand the legal processes in this case and the effort you put in .. keep up the great work 👌

[@marlenebarone9407]

Yes many of us want to hear all the arguments etc all of it ! From every aspect thanks have a great night

[@jbflyinglow]

Thank you, I appreciate your time. And would be great full for you to continue down this road your on.

[@shelleyburr3988]

Thank you for continuing a measured and professional breakdown of the legal aspects in this case.

[@mlibbym]

I am so interested in these unseal dox, thank you for taking the time to go through them and present them to us!

[@elainejohnson8677]

Keep up this good work and continue bringing this info to us!

[@jeanneshultz772]

You make understanding the law, and, motives to sue, easier to interpret. Thank you. WTF is AH even playing at?

[@EEmB]

It feels like those who comment for to not report on this might have a interest in being on AH side (not wanting these details come to light) and some might actually be bots, as Umbrella Guy have reported on. Her obsessions with bots feels a bit like "confession through projection".

[@Julia-uh4li]

Love that last sentence of yours!!! 💙 Spot in imo.

[@debrarossi4235]

I find this very interesting for my own personal reasons. I watched the whole trial and it didn't have anything to with celebrities. I like your content!

[@cdavis4857]

Thank you for the coverage! Appreciate you sharing your knowledge with us!

[@suemagic8864]

It has so many complex legal questions. Love your content especially breakdown if UK trial

[@videosrfunfunfun]

I am enjoying all of your videos. I had no idea so much went on before an actual trial. I am learning a lot. Thank You.

[@susanmccarthy423]

I think the UK should over turn there verdict.

[@CsykKrit]

Where verdict?

[@deang5622]

their verdict. Or correctly, their judgment. Civil cases don't have verdicts.

[@marywilde3729]

Thanks!

[@BlackBeltBarrister]

Thank you so much - I just found the filter button for the SuperThanks! 😊 🙏

[@7SoHo7]

Thanks very much Daniel. I really really appreciate your videos.

[@tamitrigg1337]

Would you mind making the page bigger, so it’s a bit easier to read the words along with you!? Thx very much for doing all this for us! 😊 from Ontario Canada 🇨🇦💖

[@SuperDrLisa]

Please continue your explanations of legal issues. Very interesting.

[@tamerafrank4645]

Thanks for all! Would love a tour if your space! Love the lighting and would love to copy your look! Great vibe!!

[@connieostroha8423]

I find your discussion and explanation of the legal issues and arguments fascinating. Thank you. P.S. I signed the petition and donated.

[@susanryan3479]

Yes I signed the petition and shared it. Just shared to Facebook again.

[@emriesq3096]

NY/NJ lawyer here. Enjoying your channel!

[@duzitickle3544]

Just wanted to say that I found you through the jdah trial and found your perspective wonderful. You're like a liaison between the UK trial(+?) and US trial+ and I appreciate you for that. Ah will ultimately destroy Ah in ways only Ah can. She continues to show us what kind of person she is.

[@MariaRodriguez-op8it]

I like your views and opinions on these issues......keep them coming. Thank you for the video.

[@suzannebadger8135]

Soon AH will be blaming her lawyers more then she already has lol. This woman needs to accept she lost because of everything SHE did to JD!

[@margaretsharp499]

Knowing is protection, thank you for passing on your knowledge!!!

[@chrissy7033]

Thank you for informing us on the justice and legal side of cases.

[@paulaunger3061]

I love these deep dives. The trial might have ended with the verdict, but all the issues thrown up by the trial will be relevant forever - hence why older cases which proved a relevant point are cited in legal documents for current cases. Each one is so illuminating - I know some people thing Amber's behaviour sealed her fate in this court, but it was by no means certain. And this video today, highlighting how far she wanted to go, really do illuminate how vindictive she is and how desperate to hurt her ex-husband she was. It's a rather terrifying insight into an essentially criminal mindset - and the more we know about this kind of person, the more we can protect ourselves against them when we encounter them in normal life (and this, sadly, is fairly inevitable it seems). Please keep up the good work.

[@MermaidCore_]

I very much appreciate your perspective on this case! Keep on, Sir 👍🏻👍🏻

[@calico-kat-mom6204]

Thank you so much for your explanations thank you for your time because this doesn't compass more than just the trial there are many teachable moments here and I want to learn, I just had an occurrence in my own life that made me understand exactly what happened that would make me know I didn't do anything wrong so I'm appreciative of you're still talking about this, have a pleasant day

[@janetbowersox83]

I enjoy learning different aspects of the law.......very informative......

[@alnadaf]

I gather there is nothing comparable to a finding of fundamental dishonesty here!? 🤔😉

[@heather3316]

What startles me the most is the Russian affair, how they came out with that one will forever be a mystery

[@orian-080]

JD's UK trial against The Sun is extremely fishy -- too many discrepancies.

[@ceceliakirchner970]

Your channel is really insightful 👌

[@ACB2000]

Give me all the JD vs AH trial coverage! I can't wait to see the insurance companies go after AH. I hope you will cover it!

[@thekitowl]

Go watch the Real Laura B ‘s excellent breakdown of the insurance companies legal battle.

[@chrissylee325]

I love the idea of legal arguments and viewers voting! 😊

[@steved9869]

I LOVE your idea for arbitration and voting. this could really change the way the world do legal issues one day in the distant future! Imagine being a forefather and visionary of that! I would become a member immediately

[@Yardahstud]

Like you Steve D, I think this is an amazing idea. As you say, it is visionary. We now have the technology to do it. The world needs transparency now, more than ever.

[@steveng6788]

Very unique interesting channel. Glad i came across it. thanks

[@savannahgary6351]

I'm a vote for continuing to use the legal documents from Depp v Heard as a teaching and informative exercise! I had a career as a Certified Legal Assistant and am long retired, but thoroughly enjoy listening to you...your videos are fun and informative and I appreciate the general public having some basic understanding of the law!

[@mariat108]

VERY USEFUL episode and videos in general! Thank you! This education is very valuable.

[@debbielowe5496]

Absolutely 💯 % enjoy these videos. I'm learning so much!

[@LadyBern]

At this point it's not that this trial is being milked but that so many things happened within it and are still happening that it's a great example for certain things, terms, tactics, things I don't know/etc. Without a doubt it's best to discuss some of the current matters now so that we, who knows nothing, are able to understand the significance. This trial being as transparent and public as it was really makes it easy to go back and look to see/ watch what's being discussed or referenced.

[@Begining2013]

What I've learned by watching this JD/AH trial is: there's probably no punishment for lying, obstruction or provable perjury. Taking an Oath means nothing to some. There appears to be no consequences for lawyers who breech previous court orders or rules. And most trials should be televised (unless objected to by the parties).

[@PirateWW]

Love your videos on this topic! Thank you!

[@lenaonmealways4193]

I like learning about these legal issues and tatics...thank you for explaining them.

[@kathys6467]

I’m here in California and will continue watching these videos if you continue to make them. Keep teaching the public (both in the UK and USA) and hopefully those of rational thought will think twice before they hurl accusations at someone else. I am the mom of two grown men and was relieved that the jury looked at the facts presented. I fear that histrionics are being interpreted as facts. This gave me hope. By the way, cute dog💕

[@internetpolification]

So how did Elaine get away with repeated references during the trial to the U.K. trials and in her closing argument to the jury? Why was she not admonished for that? It seems she read the document you refer to and then ignored it

[@Teddypally]

I think it was a trap. If one lawyer references something and the other lawyer addresses it, the first lawyer can introduce it into evidence. If the jury doesn't know the reference, its impact on the case is limited. Sort of like when amber named people, Depp's lawyers could introduce those people's testimony.

[@TheSiriusEnigma]

That’s “sleazy lawyer” 101. They are not allowed to talk about it, but the judge can only stop them after they did. The trick is to slip just enough.

[@starrthompson4927]

Elaine and.her team tried several underhanded things to influence the jury IMO. Remember in Elaine's closing she said the JD walked into the Daily Mail offices with Mr. Waldman and made those statements about the hoak to try to tie JD to the Waldman statements. There was no evidence of that. Do you think that JD would go to the daily mail offices at all when he had other people who he could get to do that for him if needed. AH found the right lawyer when she hired Elaine...unethical.

[@internetpolification]

@@TheSiriusEnigma but the judge didn’t stop her though?

[@TheSiriusEnigma]

@@internetpolification it was too late. The issue is that a judge will not sanction a lawyer for “minor” violations as it deprives the represented party of proper representation. This can be room for appeal. In the US at least.