Good to read your comment about being a former atheist, God bless you.
@Penndreic4 ай бұрын
No longer a skeptic eh?
@Mark-ec3lp4 ай бұрын
@@Penndreic Never have been a skeptic regarding God.
@Penndreic4 ай бұрын
@@Mark-ec3lp That was not directed at you. But hey, thanks for your honesty. You can’t be a skeptic and believe in god anyways.
@42kBandz4 ай бұрын
@@Penndreicthe math is mathing!
@getx1265 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for such a reasonable explanation of a verse I hear misused so often by those trying to prove a trinity doctrine. The Bible repeatedly refers to Jesus as God's son. That seems pretty simple to understand that they can't be one and the same. Or two and the same.
@christinefarrall9391 Жыл бұрын
This young man is wrong. Please don't believe him. Jehonah's witnesses have their own bible and it is altered to say, that Jesus is not God.
@saulm58 Жыл бұрын
@@christinefarrall9391 Actually, his interpretation and argument are supported by what the Greek text says. Of course, you may disagree with what he is explaining. But his argument is valid (logically speaking).
@mstru79 Жыл бұрын
👊😇Amen!!
@getx1265 Жыл бұрын
@HalleluYAH7773 We all read the same verses. What's your point here?
@mstru79 Жыл бұрын
@@saulm58 you need to read church history and the anti-nausea Church fathers they weren't even close to trinitarian here is Clement who was directly taught from Peter and John. John 17:3 Now this is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom You have sent. 1 Clement 59:4 Let all the Gentiles know that Thou art the God alone, and Jesus Christ is Thy Son
@aaronsanchez3141 Жыл бұрын
Great to hear from someone of a younger generation who has discovered the truth in the face of opposition.
@GraciaBelievesthatJesusSaves Жыл бұрын
❤️🖐️.And the Almighty God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob and Lord Jesus the Son of God will deal with opposition and i Have seen His Mighty hand dealing with " opposition " because He wants everyone to get Saved and Hear the Gospel of Jesus Christ .
@priscillajervey834511 ай бұрын
AMEM!!!!
@mysticguide5039 ай бұрын
The key to make awareness of is the beginning is not referring Genesis 1.
@priscillajervey83459 ай бұрын
Amen!
@Gats84797 ай бұрын
What truhr he disxover? Would you like to watch Dr. Jeff Vickers in John 1:1 to resolve these peole here who are unbelief of Jesuus Christ deity.
@aaronmosa8015 Жыл бұрын
In luke 6.12 Jesus prayed to God (Jesus went out to a mountainside to pray, and spent the night praying to God.).
@debraannmartinez7157 Жыл бұрын
Yes, He did say thank You to God before he raised Lazarus to life
@KINGDREX2410 ай бұрын
I agree with Christianity Christianity that made America and that’s a fact, but a Trinity that never came from God or never talk about none of his profits. I disagree with it because it’s not it’s not real
@KingoftheJuice189 ай бұрын
This is where their strategy comes in of saying, "The human side of Jesus was praying."
@tombuddy1009 ай бұрын
Why is there such fervor among Trinitarians to defend illogical doctrine neither found nor implied in the Bible?
@homielifesaver23329 ай бұрын
Exodus 13:21 And the (Lord=Jesus) went before them by day in a pillar of a cloud, to lead them the way; and by night in a pillar of fire, to give them light; to go by day and night. So Jesus was in the cloud right? 1 Corinthians 10:1-4 1. Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea. 2. And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and the sea. 3. And did all eat the same spiritual meat; 4. And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that same spiritual (ROCK THAT FOLLOWED THEM): and (THAT ROCK WAS CHRIST). So in Exodus it said that God was in the cloud, but in (1 Corinthians 10:1-4) says that it is Jesus. -------- In (John 17:5) Jesus leaves his glory in heaven, why do you think that he did that? Well read (Philippians 2:6-8) where Jesus is in the form of God, but says that he would not use that to his advantage when he took on flesh to live a perfect life without sin. Also this is why Jesus prayed to the Father, and said that the Father was greater than himself, because he left his glory in heaven with the Father.
@lizzard13666 Жыл бұрын
Love your work brother! This video reminds me of my John 1:1 Dilemma! The John 1:1 Dilemma actually proves the Trinity false all by itself. Trinitarians read John 1:1 in one of two possible ways: 1) In the beginning was Jesus, and Jesus was WITH the Father, and Jesus WAS the Father. 2) In the beginning was Jesus, and Jesus was WITH God, and Jesus WAS God. If a Trinitarian picks 1, they must state that Jesus IS the Father, which is heresy to a Trinitarian. If a Trinitarian picks 2, they must state that Jesus was apart from God, WITH God, but not God himself. Option 2 carries the further issue of forcing there to be two Gods, one that Jesus is WITH and one that Jesus IS. Obviously option 2 is heresy to a Trinitarian as well. So that leaves you with zero possible options as a Trinitarian, and this is why John 1:1 precludes Trinitarianism.
@Justadudeman22 Жыл бұрын
Excellent
@lizzard13666 Жыл бұрын
@JordanJackson41 Yeah, so "God" is just the "divine substance" you mentioned. So ... Jesus cannot be "WITH" his own divine substance. That's exactly my point.
@lizzard13666 Жыл бұрын
@JordanJackson41 The Bible is quite clear that Jesus IS Spirit ...
@lizzard13666 Жыл бұрын
@JordanJackson41 Sure, love your thoughts bro! That's what my denomination teaches too!
@homielifesaver2332 Жыл бұрын
@@lizzard13666 Deuteronomy 6:4 Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God is (ONE or echad in Hebrew) Lord. Genesis 2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be (ONE or echad in Hebrew) flesh. Just because God is one God doesn’t mean that he is not Trinity. ----------- John 8:16-18 16. And yet if I judge, my judgement is true: for I am NOT ALONE, but I and the FATHER that sent me. 17. It is also written in your law, that the testimony of TWO MEN is true. 18. I am ONE that bear witness of myself, AND THE FATHER that sent me beareth witness of me. --------- John 17:21 That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in ME, and I in THEE, that they may also be one in US: that the world may believe that THOU has sent ME. ------- Genesis 18:1 said the Lord appeared to Abraham and verse 2 says three men stood by him. Then Abraham feed and washed the Lords feet. Then in verse 22 two of the men went to Sodom, and the Lord stayed behind to speak with Abraham. In chapter 19:1 the two angels that were with the Lord show up to save Lot. Then verse 24 happens. Genesis 19:24 Then the Lord rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven. So the Lord on the earth that just talked to Abraham called fire from the Lord out of heaven. Who was the Lord on the earth and who was the Lord out of heaven?
@Christiannss9 ай бұрын
Jesus Christ is The Word of God because through him all of God's purposes come true...That's why THE WORD became flesh: to fulfill all of God's promises and his sacred will...Jesus is depicted in Proverbs chapter 8 as Wisdom, personified...when we carefully read the account we can get a clearer sight of Jesus' role in God's plan... Colossians 1:15-18. Jesus is"... The Christ, the Son of The living God..." -Matthew 16:13-17. May The Almighty God bless you in the name of his Son, our king and Lord, Jesus Christ..! Amen.
@RoseIsMushy3 ай бұрын
I support you
@homielifesaver23322 ай бұрын
@@Christiannss Jesus is God the Son.
@diazthebarber2 ай бұрын
@@homielifesaver2332make it make sense dummie
@homielifesaver23322 ай бұрын
@@diazthebarber Read the whole Bible and do not look at scripture out of context. Consider the law of non contradiction and these verses. (Colossians 1:16) For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in the earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created (BY HIM), and (FOR HIM): So Colossians clearly claimed that Jesus created everything right? (Isaiah 44:24) Thus saith the Lord, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the (LORD THAT MAKETH ALL THINGS); that stretched forth the heavens (ALONE); that spreadeth abroad the earth (BY MYSELF); In (Isaiah 44:24) it clearly states that God created everything ALONE. Only with the Trinity’s view of scripture can both these verses be true.
@homielifesaver23322 ай бұрын
@munkeeboi1982 Do you understand reading comprehension? (Colossians 1:16) is clearly talking about Jesus being the one who created everything.
@janiceellery1653 Жыл бұрын
The modern UU church in the US has become more of a humanistic philosophical organization. The last time I went to one years ago somebody was"offended" because I used the word God. They are so far from what William Ellery Channing taught that it's not really a church anymore. I am related to William Ellery Channing via his grandfather William Ellery, who was the signer on the declaration of independence from Rhode Island. -Dr. Janice Ellery
@ken440 Жыл бұрын
These folk who made this video are certainly not UU (unitarian universalists).
@thecalling61229 ай бұрын
You couldn't be more correct and this movement is sweeping the internet on every single Christian discussion forum and all social media everywhere. It is a modern version of Judaism that 100% denies Jesus and seeks to erase Him. It is, as the Bible defines, an anti-Christ doctrine. This belief system is fully rejected by 1 Jn. 2:22-23 and Jn. 14:6. Those who do not embrace, and believe in, Jesus Christ as God, do not have any access to the Father. God bless.
@whateverwhatever72108 ай бұрын
@@ken440How do you even find a unitarian church that is not UU?
@ken4408 ай бұрын
@@whateverwhatever7210 well there is neither here down under. no matter, i fellowship on line sometimes. "going to church" has lost its flavour for me anyway now that im not welcome, after a life of over 30 years doing that as a misguided trinitarian, nor is it what we are called to do. We are supposed to go out into the world and make disciples. and not going to church cant be blamed for becoming unitarian, i did that back when i was in trinitarian circles and didnt know there was such a thing as a unitarian.
@larrythrasher9713 Жыл бұрын
In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God. And the word was godly. The anarthrous noun takes on the properties of an adjective without the article.
@nataliuselyanto210 Жыл бұрын
And may I ask to what extent the word was godly?
@lampkin92878 ай бұрын
@@nataliuselyanto210it’s a lie. It plain says and the word was The God. But they don’t know Greek. It just lies with no proof. The word is theos and the os end means that the word is a subject noun, so the article isn’t there but is implied by the form of the words ending; os. Devils won’t go into detail to give you the knowledge so you aren’t deceived. They hate the true Jesus so they attack his deity.
@QuëstionšnÅňşwęŕż7 ай бұрын
It does not say in Greek "the" God. The definite article is not present.
@lampkin92877 ай бұрын
@@QuëstionšnÅňşwęŕż you aren’t applying all of the rules of Greek for interpretation. This is only a half true. I can show you several examples of there not being an article and the translation reads The God, even in the NWT. So learn some more Greek first so that you may stop being deceived
@QuëstionšnÅňşwęŕż7 ай бұрын
@@lampkin9287 ok go on. What rules should I be applying at John 1:1? My comment was in response to the comment which said "it plainly says and the Word was The God." It doesn't say "the" "o" theos.
@Cors7358 Жыл бұрын
Trinity makes no sense... And john 1:1 can also be translated as ".....and the word was a god. " This makes more sense..... then this will make no sense for unitarian.....
@debraannmartinez7157 Жыл бұрын
Thats why people are confused! LIFE
@Cors7358 Жыл бұрын
@@debraannmartinez7157 You dont have to base it on just a verse.... You have to read the whole of that gospel to understand.... Its confusing when some men inject a belief in you.... It came from apostle John, why not take the context from apostle John's epistles.... Surely it will be explained in John's epistles.....
@debraannmartinez7157 Жыл бұрын
Save your comment for Oprah. Just because you can't accept the truth. Babe, it is easy to read and understand 1st-grade language. Get a book and re-read your bible! @@Cors7358
@debraannmartinez7157 Жыл бұрын
Right, you shouldn't, but many of you do. So stop throwing scripture; making it fix your claim!@@Cors7358
@Cors73587 ай бұрын
@Bible-Christian I don't believe in the Doctrines of the Trinity.... I do believe there is one God (the Father), but we cant set aside the scriptures that Jesus is the begotten Son of the Father... If we examine this whole first chapter of the book of John, I can say that it derive its context in the book of Proverbs, particularly chapter 8. You will find the similarities of its context pertaining to Jesus as the Logos/Wisdom. its much better if you read the whole chapter of Proverbs 8. this Wisdom of God is sentient and we do all know that Jesus is the wisdom of God. Below are verses to prove. 22. “The Lord made me as he began his planning, before his ancient activity commenced. 23 From eternity I was appointed, from the beginning, from before there was land. 24 When there were no ocean depths, I brought them to birth at a time when there were no springs. 30 Then I was with him, his master craftsman- I was his delight daily, continuously rejoicing in his presence, 31 rejoicing in his inhabitable world and taking delight in mankind.”
@riverman88914 ай бұрын
Jehovah witnesses have been telling people the same thing about Jesus but a lot of people didn't want to listen to them.
@Riley-lh6cr2 ай бұрын
Yup.
@goldfishblue9227Ай бұрын
Not just Jehovah witnesses, even tho I don’t agree with the Islam religion , they mention Jesus is not God either.
@technicianbis5250-ig1zdАй бұрын
They are not perfect and yet will not change their doctrines, however I believe they got this part right as well as Jesus is Michael.
@goldfishblue9227Ай бұрын
No one is perfect
@a.ihistory587926 күн бұрын
They have a lot of incorrect theology such as their interpretation of blood and Jesus ruling in 1914, etc. Their translation is also filled with other errors
@nancypost53237 ай бұрын
Great explanation without an arrogant comment tone.
@IsJesusGod. Жыл бұрын
Good man and good teaching. May I please add: Notice how John 1:14 DID NOT SAY: And (GOD) became flesh and dwelt among us, as would be the case if John was teaching Jesus is GOD who became flesh, as MOST wrongly believe Jesus is GOD who became flesh. John 1:14 continues saying: And we beheld His glory, a glory as of an only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth. Notice Jesus is: an only begotten from the Father, meaning Jesus was BORN and Fathered from His GOD and Father, proving Jesus is NOT the SAME GOD He was Begotten from. To be Begotten means to come into existence, and NOT always existing as most wrongly believe. John 1:14 is simply saying the (word) of Yahweh became a living, walking, physical MAN, called The Word (OF) God in Revelation 19:13 and Yahweh's Begotten Son. 1 Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, set apart for the Good News of God, 2 which he promised before through his prophets in the holy Scriptures, 3 concerning his Son, who was born of the seed of David according to the flesh, 4 who was declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the Spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead, Jesus Christ our Lord, 5 through whom we received grace and apostleship, for obedience of faith among all the nations, for his name's sake; 6 among whom you are also called to belong to Jesus Christ; Notice how Jesus first came into existence by HAVING BEEN BORN OF A WOMEN? Please notice how we read in Acts 2:22 saying Jesus was a MAN, and nothing about Jesus being GOD, or an Angel, or some kind of Spirit being BEFORE He was BORN: Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, (A MAN) having been set forth by God to you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by Him in your the midst, as you yourselves know. Notice in John 8:40 how Jesus Himself confirms He is (A MAN) and says nothing about Himself being GOD, or an Angel, or some kind of Spirit being BEFORE He was BORN: Jesus did speak figuratively by saying He came down from Heaven and simply meant He came from GOD as GOD is in heaven, just as Jesus tells us in Matthew 6:9 saying: Therefore pray you like this: 'Our Father (IN THE HEAVENS), hallowed be Your name! But now you seek to kill Me, (A MAN) who has spoken to you the truth that I heard from God. Abraham did not do this. Romans 1: Notice how Paul tells us that Jesus: was BORN of the seed of David according to the flesh, who was declared to be the Son of God, in line with what Jesus tells us in John 10:36 saying I am the Son of GOD. NOT GOD. Notice how we do NOT read Paul saying Jesus PRE-EXISTED his flesh before David? NOWHERE is it written that Jesus was already alive with GOD in heaven and was transformed into the BABY Jesus, unless you are reading the many false modern Bible translations. But instead we read Paul saying Jesus comes into existence by the seed of David according to the flesh, in line with John 1:14 saying the word of GOD became FLESH, as the SON of MAN Jesus. If Jesus was WITH GOD before He was BORN as a MAN, then WHAT WAS HE? Notice how we read in John 3:16, how GOD GAVE us His only begotten Son, and yet most have been deceived into believing in a false Gospel teaching GOD came and gave Himself and madly believe died on the cross, when the truth is GOD cannot DIE, when it was GOD's SON who died, NOT GOD, which makes a false Christ. Just as James 1:17 tells us: Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights, with whom can be no variation, nor turning shadow. Jesus is truly a gift from GOD, when we take up our cross and deny ourselves by believing and following the true Jesus, we will be saved: For God so loved the world that (HE GAVE) the only begotten Son, so that everyone believing in Him should not perish, but should have eternal life. John 3:16. BLB.
@mstru79 Жыл бұрын
Exactly!!💨
@IsJesusGod. Жыл бұрын
@@mstru79 Bless you!
@IsJesusGod. Жыл бұрын
@HalleluYAH7771 Revelation 1:8, "I am the Alpha and the Omega," says Lord God, the One being, and who was, and who is coming, the Almighty. 1. Revelation 1:8, is GOD the Father, and NOT Jesus. This is easy to understand because we clearly see who the person is in this verse which” says the Lord God, “who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.” Revelation 1:8. IT IS WORTH KNOWING THAT JESUS IS NEVER EVER CALLED: THE LORD GOD, OR THE ALMIGHTY. Notice below how super Trinitarian Barns Notes confirms Revelation 1:8 should NOT be used as proof of Jesus being GOD, contradicting what MOST Trinitarians say: 2. Revelation 1:11, I am the Alpha and the Omega is clearly Not genuine, and was added in some translations to make us believe Jesus is GOD almighty. Who added: I am the Alpha and the Omega, in Revelation 1:11? Was it the same people who altered: 1 John 5:7 in the King James Bible? I wonder if they are Trinitarians? Revelation 21:6, And He said to me, "It is done! I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end. To the one thirsting I will give of the spring of the water of life freely. 3. Revelation 21:6, also has nothing to do with Jesus being GOD, because the verse goes on to tell us: The one overcoming will inherit all things, and I will be his God, and he will be My son. As Jesus never, ever taught that He was our GOD and Father, but instead taught that His Father was our Father, and His GOD was our GOD, and He was a brother, this is then obvious Revelation 21:6, is also about GOD almighty and NOT Jesus.
@IsJesusGod. Жыл бұрын
@HalleluYAH7771 4. Revelation 22:13, But what about Revelation 22,13? There are people who are in agreement, which I also agree, Revelation 22,13, is not the Title for Jesus but for GOD ALMIGHTY. This is easy to establish by reading through Revelation 22,12 to 21. WHO is now talking to John? We read it is one of the seven angels in Revelation 21:9 The New Jerusalem 9 And one of the seven angels having the seven bowls being full of the seven last plagues came and spoke with me, saying, “Come here, I will show you the bride, the wife of the Lamb.” Notice verse 6: Notice how Trinitarians have added in Jesus is coming before verse 6 when this is referring to GOD. 👉 Jesus is Coming👈 6 And he said to me, “These words are faithful and true. And the Lord, the God of the spirits of the prophets, sent His angel to show His servants the things that must come to pass in quickness.” We read in verse 6 that The Lord, the God of the spirits of the prophets, sent His angel. Notice at this point how there is NOTHING about Jesus sending His Angel or talking to John Himself, but instead: the Lord, the God of the spirits of the prophets, sent His angel. So we read here the Angel is talking for the Lord GOD, and continues to say: 7“ And behold, I am coming quickly. Blessed is the one keeping the words of the prophecy of this book.” 8 And I, John, am the one hearing and seeing these things. And when I heard and saw, I fell down to worship before the feet of the angel showing these things me. 9 And he says to me, “See that you not do this. I am your fellow servant, and with your brothers the prophets, and with those keeping the words of this book. Worship God!” 10 And he says to me, “Do not seal the words of the prophecy of this book; for the time is near. 11 The one being unrighteous, let him be unrighteous still; and he who is filthy, let him be filthy still; and he who is righteous, let him practice righteousness still; and he who is holy, let him be holy still.” 12 “Behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to give to each as is his work. 13 I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.” Notice the Angel is talking for GOD to John, and NOT JESUS, and the Angel says for GOD in verse 13: I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.” 14 Blessed are those washing their robes, that their right will be to the tree of life, and they shall enter into the city by the gates. 15 Outside are the dogs, and the sorcerers, and the sexually immoral, and the murderers, and the idolaters, and everyone loving and practicing falsehood. Notice If we turn to Isaiah 40:10, we will find the similar language is found saying: Behold, the Lord Yahweh will come as a mighty one, and his arm will rule for him. Behold, his reward is with him, and his recompense before him. World English Bible Just as we read it is GOD ALMIGHTY in: Isaiah 62:11 Behold, Yahweh has proclaimed to the end of the earth, "Say to the daughter of Zion, 'Behold, your salvation comes. Behold, his reward is with him, and his recompense before him.'" World English Bible Countless scriptures tell us the same message that it is Yahweh GOD ALMIGHTY who rewards the righteous THROUGH His SON and with Jesus our Mediator. We continue to read that it is GOD ALMIGHTY who is our salvation, because it was GOD's own plan to send and sacrifice his own begotten SON Jesus to save us. Behold, God is my salvation. I will trust, and will not be afraid; for Yah, Yahweh, is my strength and song; and he has become my salvation." Isaiah 12:2. World English Bible The scriptures teach us Yahweh GOD ALMIGHTY who saves, and then THROUGH His SON. If [any of] your outcasts are in the uttermost parts of the heavens, from there will Yahweh your God gather you, and from there he will bring you back: Deuteronomy 30:4 World English Bible We have clearly seen how Revelation 22:6 to Revelation 22:16 is about the Angel talking for the Lord GOD, and the Lord GOD says in verse 13 I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.” AND NOT JESUS. We now move from the Angel talking for the Lord GOD, to an Angel talking for Jesus of Himself in the very next part of Revelation 22:16, 16 “I, Jesus, have sent my angel to testify to you about these things for the churches. I am the root and the descendant of David, the bright morning star.” Notice how Jesus makes a clear difference between Himself and GOD, and again clearly IDENTIFIES Himself through His Angel saying: 16 “I, Jesus, have sent my angel to testify to you about these things for the churches. I am the root and the descendant of David, the bright morning star.” Again there is nothing said by Jesus calling Himself: I am the Alpha and the Omega. 17 The Spirit and the Bride say, “Come.” And let the one who hears say, “Come.” And let the one who is thirsty come; let the one who desires take the water of life without price. 18 I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book, 19 and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book. 20 He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus! 21 The grace of the Lord Jesus be with all. Amen. Notice how Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers, says it is GOD who gives back to each one his work,” says St. John. (12) And, behold, I come quickly . . .-Rather, Behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me to give back to each one as his work is. To give back to each: here we have the truth declared by St. Paul uttered in words borrowed from Isaiah (Isaiah 40:10). “Whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap,” wrote St. Paul (Galatians 6:7-8): “God gives back to each one his work,” says St. John. Conclusion. Many say: The “Alpha and Omega” statements prove Jesus is God. But instead my research reveals the Biblical facts that prove The “Alpha and Omega” statements are the Titles for GOD ALMIGHTY alone. This is proved by Jesus own words, by the fact Jesus ALWAYS IDENTIFIED Himself and never ever identified Himself as The Alpha and Omega. The Biblical facts. From the beginning of Revelation to the end of Revelation, John always declares ONE biblical fact, that there is ONE being who is the creator and GOD ALMIGHTY alone. This perfect example can be seen below: Revelation 4: 11 “Worthy are You, our Lord and God, to receive glory and honor and power; for You created all things, and because of Your will, they existed and were created.” Notice in Revelation 17:14 how Jesus is NOT called GOD Almighty: The Victory of the Lamb 14 These will make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb will overcome them, because He is Lord of lords and King of kings; and those with Him are called and chosen and faithful.” Notice in Revelation 19:15 how John refers to Jesus and defines who is GOD by saying: the wrath of God the Almighty. 15 And out of His mouth goes forth a sharp sword, so that with it He may strike down the nations; and He will shepherd them with a rod of iron. And He treads the press of the wine of the fury of the wrath of God the Almighty. 16 And He has a name having been written upon the robe and upon His thigh: In Revelation 20:6 we see again how John clarifies who is GOD and who is Christ by saying God and of Christ: 6 Blessed and holy is the one having a part in the first resurrection! Over these the second death has no authority, but they will be priests of God and of Christ, and will reign with Him a thousand years. Throughout the whole book of Revelation, we clearly see how John always IDENTIFIES GOD as the Lord God Almighty ALONE, and Jesus as the Lamb of GOD ALONE and NEVER EVER are both GOD and the Lamb described as ONE GOD, or the Lamb as being the SAME GOD, as seen in Revelation 21: And I saw no temple in it, for the Lord God Almighty is its temple, and the Lamb. 23 And the city has no need of the sun, nor of the moon, that they should shine in it; for the glory of God enlightened it, and its lamp is the Lamb. 24 And the nations will walk by its light, and the kings of the earth bring their glory into it. 25 And its gates shall not be shut by day, for there will be no night there. There is absolutely not a single word from the beginning of Revelation to the end of Revelation where John calls Jesus GOD, or where Jesus calls Himself GOD, or where GOD ALMIGHTY calls His SON GOD. This Biblical fact, is an identical striking fact, that Jesus never, ever calls himself GOD, in the gospels of Matthew Mark or Luke. And as we have carefully examined the identical striking fact in the book of Revelation, when we carefully examine John’s Gospel, we discover the same fact yet again, that millions have taken John’s Gospel out of context. We have to ask ourselves, if John truly meant Jesus was GOD in John 1:1, than why did he not teach Jesus was GOD anywhere in the book of Revelation? No one needs to be a Bible scholar to see and understand this simple biblical fact. But instead all one needs is what Jesus always taught with what GOD ALMIGHTY has provided: Anyone with ears to hear should listen and understand! Matthew 11:15. When we do hear, we simply SEE, Jesus never, ever claimed to be GOD or His own Father, and this simple Biblical fact shows how MOST are sadly deceived.
@IsJesusGod. Жыл бұрын
@HalleluYAH7771 You 👉 John 8:58 - ”Jesus said to them: “Most assuredly, I say to you: Before Abraham was; I AM (THE LIVING GOD).” ---------------------------------------------------------------- Reply 👇 John 8:58 The Correct Meaning. Jesus said to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am." Jesus was simply saying: Before Abraham existed, I am (He), I am the one, I am (He) the promised Messiah and deliverer, ORDAINED and chosen as the Begotten Son of GOD and Lamb of GOD before the foundations of the world. Notice how Jesus DID NOT SAY: before Abraham was, I existed. Notice how Jesus DID NOT SAY: before Abraham was, I am - GOD. Notice how Jesus DID NOT SAY: before Abraham was, I was alive with GOD. GOD THE SON IS A FALSE CHRIST.
@miko8297 Жыл бұрын
Good video i hope this channel will be posting more often, greetings from Slovakia
@csouthland Жыл бұрын
What part of Slovakia are in?
@csouthland Жыл бұрын
Correction: What part of Slovakia are you in?
@miko8297 Жыл бұрын
@@csouthland Bratislava- capital city, west
@Paygelove Жыл бұрын
I didn’t realise ppl thought Jesus was God till a few years ago .. it never made sense to me as we are supposed to pray to Father through Jesus ..
@aaronmosa8015 Жыл бұрын
It is worship the God Lord ( father) directly. Jesus said ( my teaching is not my own but from the one /God/who sent me)
@rickyzoe1 Жыл бұрын
@HalleluYAH7771 Look at Revelation 1:4-5. It says who John saw in his vision. Notice it say’s “the one who is and was and is to come and from the seven spirits before his throne and from Jesus Christ the faithful witness. The first born from the dead.” In these two verses it is distinguishing Jesus from the one on the throne who was and is and is to come. The Almighty. It is clear to any honest person that verse 8 is the one on the throne with the seven spirits before him. Who was and is and is to come. The Almighty of verse 4 not the faithful witness ( Jesus Christ ) of verse 5. Look at it again very carefully.
@EVENSOAMEN9 ай бұрын
You can't trust what people say, read the scriptures yourself, NOT the New World Translation but read the KJV.
@priscillajervey83459 ай бұрын
I was 40 yrs of age when I discovered Jesus was supposed to be God! I just thought the trinity meant God the father and Jesus his only begotten virgin born son, but wasn't quite sure who the holy spirit was. 🤔
@nks22698 ай бұрын
Its new to me also, i never heard it and suddenly i saw it everywhere 👀 alo my church they had a song about it🤔 but Where did this suddenly come from??
@zeroenjoyer25505 ай бұрын
Thank you for a good explanation. I always found it strange when people brought that verse to explain why Jesus is the God, yet I didn't get it because Jesus was not mentioned in the first place.
@ljnouata9088Ай бұрын
Hey Trinitarians. Who is the God that the Logos was with in John 1:1b?
@toonnaobi-okoye2949 Жыл бұрын
I'm partially curious, what happened to the other host, the older gentleman? Is he ok?
@biblicalunitarian Жыл бұрын
Yes, he is doing great, he just has other tasks he is focusing on, like translating the REV. This is his primary task lately. Check it out: www.revisedenglishversion.com/
@thecalling61229 ай бұрын
They are working to make this unbiblical doctrine more attractive to the younger crowds. What they are teaching here is completely unbiblical.
@CanadianLoveKnot Жыл бұрын
The word in the beginning was "Let there be Light"
@ViruzVera11 ай бұрын
As a Muslim I like your Content Unitarian are the Real followers of Jesus( pbuh)
@ViruzVera10 ай бұрын
@@WeLiveInside1 what is your Point?
@manifestemanifeste81486 ай бұрын
Isaiah 9:6 (NIV). Prophecy about Jesus.
@sergiocastano2484Ай бұрын
Anyone who cites Jesus as the creator of all things, remember what Colossians states in 1:15, he is also a creation. Therefore he isn't God. " The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation." Some of you quote everything after verse 15 but not the most important part.
@adamuhaddadi5332Ай бұрын
also calls God invisible, witch Jesus is not!!
@joevi259326 күн бұрын
Firstborn doesn't mean first created. Jesus was born after many people, so he wasn't the first born human. Firstborn has to mean he has authority over all creation. He inherited all things from The Father.
@sergiocastano248426 күн бұрын
@joevi2593 The Greek word prōtotokos means "firstborn" or "first in position": Firstborn: The first to be born in time sequence First in position: The highest ranking person It can mean both, I have to respond to someone about this very topic, but what are you contending?
@joevi259325 күн бұрын
@@sergiocastano2484 Honestly, that whole passage about Jesus creating the world seems like it comes outa nowhere. I feel like it must mean something different. Paul must not be talking about him literally creating all of the mountains, trees, etc etc. That's why I think he has control and authority over creation because God The Father gave it to him.
@sergiocastano248425 күн бұрын
@joevi2593 For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell; -- Colossians 1:19 Well, the son always did what pleased his father, in heaven or earth. What confuses everything is when people say Jesus is god, too many contradictions start developing. He called himself "I Am" but throughout the whole bible, wether on earth or in heaven, there's talk about a father whom he pleases or is pleased by his son. Anyways, back 1:15 the words creature and all are on the same line. Creature that derives from creation. Even if it's talking about rank, it still doesn't make sense in the "Jesus is god" because God is superior by definition than firstborn.
@theophilus7558 Жыл бұрын
Jesus is God, Hebrews 1:1-8 1God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, 2Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds; 3Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high; 4Being made so much better than the angels, as he hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they. 5For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son? 6And again, when he bringeth in the firstbegotten into the world, he saith, And let all the angels of God worship him. 7And of the angels he saith, Who maketh his angels spirits, and his ministers a flame of fire. 8But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom. 9Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows. 10And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands: 11They shall perish; but thou remainest; and they all shall wax old as doth a garment; 12And as a vesture shalt thou fold them up, and they shall be changed: but thou art the same, and thy years shall not fail. 13But to which of the angels said he at any time, Sit on my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool? 14Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation?
@thornbird4400 Жыл бұрын
THIS 💯- shalom, friend!!!
@ken440 Жыл бұрын
that whole section you quote proves that Jesus is NOT God, read it properly. Look up that "worlds" you put in there in V2. Look it up in a concordance, just a concordance is all it takes to show your error. What does that word "worlds" mean. I think you have been conditioned to see it wrong by watching Star Trek.
@theophilus7558 Жыл бұрын
@@ken440 Concordance? Where is that in the 1611 Holy Bible? Nothing is of private interpretation. The scriptures speak for themselves.
@ken440 Жыл бұрын
@@theophilus7558 concordance helps you understand the word meaning in the original language. that word "world" in heb1:2 is the concept of the scriptural meaning of "worldlyness" or "this evil age" because the greek word there is "aeions" which means "ages." But modern sillys can only think of a planet when they see "world" now, thanks to captain Kirk going off to "discover new worlds" and so the reference context in Hebrews is set out in Heb1:1 the very verse before it !!!!! "In times past....... but now in these times..." see? all of Hebrews letter is comparing past age of law, with the current age of the body of christ. !!!!
@debraannmartinez7157 Жыл бұрын
God is one!!!! @@theophilus7558 James 2:19 You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that-and shudder.
@Zipfreer Жыл бұрын
The word' is the active creative power of God, the results of which you see in Genesis or the writing of the Tanakh. This word dwells in Jesus - this is what is shown again and again in John's gospel. He hears or speaks the word - he's not the same thing as the word. But if you want to talk about John's Gospel, Jesus says he is a man who has heard the truth from God. He says the Father is the only true God. He says the Father is greater than himself. He says the Father is greater than all. He says he is sent, authorized, granted, and does the will of the Father. John's Gospel is a very clearly subordinationist text.
@Zipfreer Жыл бұрын
@JordanJackson41 there is no eternal soul As these doctrines in the scriptures this is other false narrative of what is iYahweh breathed into life and existence the eternal soul doctrines are false interpretations added throughout by metaphysics please research this topic!
@Zipfreer Жыл бұрын
@JordanJackson41You didn't even look into the truth you just comment a false Pagan interpretations add throughout by metaphysics Yahweh breathed into life and existence the eternal soul doctrines are false interpretations add throughout by metaphysics please research this topic!
@Zipfreer Жыл бұрын
@JordanJackson41 man has three parts to a soul is more pagan doctrines Of a trinity as pagans love this three parts they have added to their beliefs regarding the false teachings of the eternal soul as scriptures teach no such thing just like the trinity doctrine.better do the studying on this stuff than we could have a discussion about it
@Zipfreer Жыл бұрын
@JordanJackson41 Well since you can't borther to do the reseach of the truth I'll give you just a taste, AS The “Immortal Soul” is Not Taught in the Bible What’s amazing is that the doctrine of the immortal soul cannot be found in Scripture. You can search in vain all you want, or twist scripture to fit your false claims and Narritvies but you’ll find no passage in the Bible saying that human beings possess immortality apart from Christ. That’s because this immortal soul belief did not originate from the Scriptures, but rather entered Judeo-Christian thought through contact with pagan Greek philosophy. The Bible teaches that God alone has immortality (1 Timothy 6:16) and he offers it to people only through the gospel: “… Christ Jesus, who has destroyed death and has brought life and immort ality to light through the gospel” (2 Timothy 1:10). The only support adherents of eternal torment can come up with for this immortal soul theory is to suggest that human beings are created “in the image of God” (Genesis 1:27) and therefore have an immortal soul and cannot die. Their reasoning is that God is immortal and therefore if human beings are created in His image then they must be immortal as well - that is, some core aspect of them, namely the soul (or mind or spirit), must be immortal. This argument assumes that being created “in the image of God” must refer to inheriting God’s characteristic of immortality. The obvious problem with this line of reasoning is that God has other characteristics such as omnipotence (all-powerful), omniscience (all-knowing) and omnipresence (present everywhere at the same time), yet we human beings have never possessed any of these characteristics even though we’re created in the image of God. Regardless, God did indeed bless the first man “Adam” with the gift of eternal life when he created him; Adam had immortality. NOTE: In the biblical Hebrew, adam (aw-DAWM) simply means “a human being (an individual or the species)” (Strong 8) or “the man” NIV footnotes for Genesis 2:7 and 20). I can go on and on proving the there is NO doctrine of the immortal soul cannot be found in Scripture. MAYBE YOU SHOULD RESEACH BEFORE COMMENTING TO ME AGAIN !
@Zipfreer Жыл бұрын
@JordanJackson41 According to John 3:16, the Bible actually teaches that only those believing in Yahshua will have eternal life. It is not something all men are born with! Likewise, John 3:16 actually teaches that those who do not believe in Yahshua will perish, not suffer for eternity in hell! AS The “Immortal Soul” is Not Taught in the Bible ANYWHERE! If you are born with an eternal soul which lives forever, why is it necessary for God to offer eternal life to every soul? It is redundant. Why would God offer eternal life to something that already has eternal life? Clealy Not, You need to study the truth of what Scripture is saying And not what man is telling you and teaching you!
@de-daa Жыл бұрын
Johnny was with the Boy Scouts, Johnny was a Boy Scout...The Father is not The Son, The Holy Spirit is not The Father, The Son is not The Holy Spirit yet they are all God. "Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness, to rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, and over all the earth itself and every creature that crawls upon it.” Gen.1:26, "Which is easier: to say, 'Your sins are forgiven,' or to say, 'Get up and walk'? Matt 9:5
@biblicalunitarian Жыл бұрын
Thanks for your comment, however, your analogy does not work with Trinitarian translations. In Trinitarian translations it would be, "Johnny was with the Boy Scout, Johnny was the Boy Scout." Your suggestion of "a boyscout" is very similar to what Trinitarians condemn, that the Word was "a God." So I'm not sure they would appreciate your analogy. I appreciate you addressing the arguments made in the video though. Also, I would like to point out that there are thousands of singular pronouns for God, so the one or two incidents (Gen. 1:26) where it may seem to be using a plural pronoun are not great evidence to then say God is a plural being. Either He is a singular being or a plural "beings". Which side does the evidence favor? Thanks again.
@IsleofLucy Жыл бұрын
Mic drop
@horusksa19838 ай бұрын
(إن الذين آمنوا والذين هادوا والنصارى والصابئين من آمن بالله واليوم الآخر وعمل صالحا فلهم أجرهم عند ربهم ولا خوف عليهم ولا هم يحزنون) . This is an extract from the Quran in surat albaqara,is that Christians who believe in the one true god, and the end of days, and have done good deeds in life, you shouldn’t worry about them, god will look after them and they will never know sadness. Unitarian Christians will enter heaven inshallah
@preachlisten41102 ай бұрын
I been studying this for a while and hearing someone confirm what I came to conclude by my own research is amazing.
@biblicalunitarian2 ай бұрын
Great to hear!
@jeffellis1800Ай бұрын
The thing I’m seeing is the Trinitarians are deceived into believing that God is triune (3 in 1) therefore when they read John’s prologue they already have a confirmation bias and then they chock it up too “it’s a mystery”. So when there reading verse one they already have their minds made up and read something different into those scriptures.
@Genet707 Жыл бұрын
Where have you been guys? It has been years since you posted videos. I’m so glad to finally see you.
@1541965 Жыл бұрын
1) in the trinity you say the father and the son are fully equal to the one another. The son is begotten but the father is unbegotten can you say that the father is begotten like the son ? 2) if the trinity is 3 persons is the trinity identical to the 3 persons ? 3) In the trinity Does the father know that he is the father ? Does the son know that he is the son ? does the father know that he is the son ? Does the son know that he is the father? 4) Does the father know that he has Human nature and does the son know that he has divine nature ? if he answer no that means they don’t have the same knowledge 5) In the trinity the three persons in god are they dependent on each others or independent of each others? 6) If the father is one with the son why he come always first in the trinity ? 7) If the three persons in the trinity are one can we replace them with one another can the son be the 1st then the spirit the 2nd then the father the 3rd ? 8) Is Jesus in the God head or would you say the God Head is in Jesus ? if he answer one of them that means we have 2 Gods in the Godhead but if he If he answer both of them we ask how can someone be in the Godhead and also the Godhead be in them at the same time ? 9) John 4:24 God is Spirit is that spirit referring to the whole trinity or to the father or the son or the Holy Spirit ? if he answer to the father it means we have 2 spirits the Holy spirit and the father spirit but if he said refer to the trinity it means we have 3 spirits in the trinity 10) Do you see the father son and the holy spirit as three different names of three persons or do you see the father son and Holy spirit as describing one name of one God if so what is the one name that it’s describing ? If he answer the one name of the one God we ask him what is the one name ? 11) Will we see the Father, the son and the Holy Spirit in heaven? 12) Was Jesus Unitarian or trinitarian ? Why ? 13) in the trinity you say the father and the son are fully equal to one another. The son is begotten but the father is unbegotten can you say that the father is begotten like the son ? 14) John 17:3 Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent. (Jesus said explicitly the father is the only true God,How many person is the father ? is he one person or three person when Jesus said he is the only TRUE God ? 15) Is the trinity one identity or three identities? 16) In the trinity do you believe in one self or three selves? 17) Is the attribute of life a Divine or human characteristic? 18) Does the father need the son to exist or does the son need the father to exist ? Does the father need the son for existence or Does the son need the father for existence or and why? 19) in the trinity you say the father and the son are fully equal to one another. The father is the one who sent the son can we say the son is the one who sent the Father because they are fully equal to one another ? 20) John 1:1 The Word = Jesus. God = the trinity. In the beginning was Jesus, and Jesus was with the trinity, and Jesus was the trinity. 21) John 1:1 The word was with God and the ward was God. can we say John was with Tom and John was Tom ? 21) John 1:12 said you are childrens of God. In the trinity Jesus = father Are you childrens of Jesus or the father ? can you say that you are childrens of Jesus ? 22) John 3:16 Jesus is the begotten son of God. In the trinity Jesus = father can you say the father is the begotten son of Jesus ?
@IsJesusGod. Жыл бұрын
Nice one, I like it. Also, 1. HOW MANY GODS are on the throne of GOD, as Trinitrans also believe Jesus is GOD? 2. Where is the HOLY Spirit on the throne of GOD? 3. As Jesus has a GOD, how is Jesus that SAME GOD? 4 Where did GOD say He was the SON? 5. Where did Jesus say He is GOD? 6. Where did GOD or Jesus say we MUST BELIEVE Jesus is GOD to be saved? “For God so loved the world, THAT HE GAVE HIS ONLY SON, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. John 3:16. 7. WHERE did GOD say He gave Himself to be crucified, if GOD is Jesus? 8. WHERE did GOD SAY the HOLY Spirit is a separate person? 9. WHERE is the HOLY Spirit in John 1:1? 10. WHERE is the HOLY Spirit on GOD'S THRONE, does He go on HOLIDAY?
@IsleofLucy Жыл бұрын
@@IsJesusGod.not going to lie, 10 made me laugh out loud. 😂
@thecalling61229 ай бұрын
@@IsJesusGod. Many of those questions are cleared up with Rev. 1:8 and Isaiah 9:6. Also Rom. 8:9-11 answers the questions about the Holy Spirit. I am not a Trinitarian.
@priscillajervey83459 ай бұрын
Bravo!!! Amen! However even with all this common sense logic, Trinitarians will still argue with you, they are hard headed and hotwired to make Jesus God! As one girl told me years afo" She couldn't STAND to believe Jesus wasn't God!" What is wrong with these people? Does someone here posting have the answer???😕🥺
@thecalling61229 ай бұрын
@@priscillajervey8345 What is "wrong" with them, in your estimation, is that they have the Holy Spirit and a spiritual discernment that tells them from within, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that Jesus IS God. Jesus is most certainly God and, sadly, many only know of the Trinity as the way that He must be God. The Trinity is nonsense. It is taught nowhere in the Bible, BUT Jesus is undoubtedly God. Anyone who reads the Gospels, and the New Testament, in their entirety, will come away with the clear understanding that Christ is God. It is crystal clear and He even declares it proudly in Rev. 1:8. Jesus says in John 8:24, 58 that if you do not believe that He is the "I AM" (the God of the OT), you will die in your sins. Best get it right.
@looktothehillz95924 ай бұрын
Malachi 3:1 NASBS "Behold, I am going to send My messenger, and he will clear the way before Me. And the Lord, whom you seek, will suddenly come to His temple; and the messenger of the covenant, in whom you delight, behold, He is coming," says the LORD of hosts.
@riverman88914 ай бұрын
This is how the New world translation of the holy scriptures used by Jehovah witnesses outs the verse... "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god. 2 This one was in the beginning with God..."
@GatheringJacob Жыл бұрын
Good thoughts/ thank you. What translation are you reading from?
@biblicalunitarian Жыл бұрын
Thanks! The REV, it is the Bible Translation produced by Spirit & Truth, Check it out here: www.revisedenglishversion.com/
@GatheringJacob Жыл бұрын
@@biblicalunitarian thanks again
@homielifesaver23329 ай бұрын
@@biblicalunitarian Exodus 13:21 And the (Lord=Jesus) went before them by day in a pillar of a cloud, to lead them the way; and by night in a pillar of fire, to give them light; to go by day and night. So Jesus was in the cloud right? 1 Corinthians 10:1-4 1. Moreover, brethren, I would that not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and passed through the sea. 2. And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea. 3. And did all eat the same spiritual meat; 4. And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual (ROCK THAT FOLLOWED THEM): and (THAT ROCK WAS CHRIST) These verses are speaking about the same event, and one says that Yahweh was in the cloud, and the other says that it is Jesus. Yahweh is the Trinity, and the Trinity is God. ---------- Isaiah 44:24 Thus saith the Lord, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the Lord that maketh (ALL THINGS); that stretched forth the heavens (ALONE); that spreadeth abroad the earth (BY MYSELF); So God created everything alone right? Colossians 1:15-16 15. Who is the image of the invisible God, firstborn of every creature: 16. For by him all things were created, that are in heaven, and that are in the earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: (ALL THINGS WERE CREATED BY HIM), and for him. So God created everything alone in Isaiah, and in Colossians it says that Jesus created everything. You have the wrong Jesus, because Jesus is God, and if you deny Jesus before men, then Jesus will deny you before the Father.
@Godisnotjesus19677 ай бұрын
@@biblicalunitarianFunny how 99% of John 1:1 arguments and commentaries never even mention John 1:2(two)......! In my opinion the one's who transliterated these scriptures were either confused and or uncertain. I'm sure John wrote this in Aramaic/Hebrew and he knew exactly what he was saying/writing.....contrary to the Greeco-Roman scholars who re-wrote the scriptures. If the phrase "the Word was God" was so authentic and absolute.....WHY MENTION THE PHRASE "THE WORD WAS WITH GOD" AGAIN??????? I'm further convinced according to Hebrews 1......that Yahushua was an Angel. Look also the scriptures in Genesis at Adams creation were it says "Let US create man in OUR image".....! Who's the "US" and "OURS"......! TECHNICALLY then, since YHVH(GOD), Yahushua, and all the Angels are invisible and Spirit "being's" with very similar characteristics........That makes GOD an Angel too!........Then Most High God(Angel)
@Godisnotjesus19677 ай бұрын
@@biblicalunitarianGod is the Head of Messiah.....Messiah is the Head of Man.....Man is Head of woman......!
@chronic_daydreamer Жыл бұрын
I’d be really curious to see if you have either done any videos on this subject or if you would do one, but I see this argument about the identities of the Father and the Son all the time, but you won’t hear Trinitarians talk much about the Holy Spirit. Can you please cover this phenomenon? I wish I was able to word this request better, but I can’t find the words. I just find it so unusual how they’ll argue all day long that Jesus is God but won’t try and explain why there is so little evidence for the Holy Spirit being God. Thanks!
@priscillajervey83456 ай бұрын
I am not sure most even know. the holy spirit is God's operational life force , it can be measured, is quantified, wind, fire, a force etc. It is who God is and NOT separate from him. It definitely is NOT a person!
@priscillajervey83456 ай бұрын
. Failing to understand that “the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets,” and instead being taught to be “controlled” by the Holy Spirit, many become influenced by demons, even while thinking that they are being “led by the spirit” of God. . Many are not walking in the power of the spirit because they are waiting for a “person” to move them, while God is waiting for them to utilize by faith that which they have already been given. God is said to have a throne (1 Kings 22:19; Dan. 7:9), inhabit heaven as His dwelling place (1 Kings 8:30,39,43 and 49), and yet “heaven and the highest heaven cannot contain” Him (1 Kings 8:27). So how can He be said to have a throne and a dwelling place and yet be uncontainable? Psalm 139:7 indicates that God’s spirit and His presence can be equivalent terms. God is therefore omnipresent by His “spirit,” which is not a separate “person.” This presence can also be extended by His personal ministers and agents, whether Christ, angels, or believers. None of these is a separate person who is also “God” in some multi-personal Godhead, but rather empowered agents who are equipped to do the will of God. . Exodus 23:20-22 mentions the angel of God’s presence that would go before Israel in the wilderness. God has permitted angels to speak as if they were God Himself, and even to use His personal name, Yahweh. A few examples of this principle are Manoah and his wife (Judg. 13:21 and 22), Jacob wrestling (Gen. 32:24-30; Hosea 12:3-5), Moses (Exod. 3:2-4, 6 and 16) and Gideon (Judg. 6:12, 13, 16 and 22). What is sometimes attributed to Jesus or to “the Holy Spirit” in the Old Testament is better explained by this principle of God manifesting Himself by means of an angelic messenger who speaks for Him in the first person (“I the Lord,” etc.) and manifests His glory. Although the Hebrew word for “spirit” (ruach), can refer to angels or evil spirits, which are persons or entities with a personality, the Hebrew usage of “the spirit of God” never refers to a person separate from, but a part of, God Almighty. Neither does the phrase, “the spirits of God” occur, which would refer to separate spiritual entities within a multipersonal God. Revelation 1:4 refers to the “seven spirits” before the throne of God. Are these seven “Holy Spirits,” or sentient entities, within the “Godhead”? The context provides the answer: they are the seven lamps of fire burning before the throne (4:5 - NRSV) and the seven horns and seven eyes of the slain Lamb (5:6). These are likely the same “spirits” mentioned in Isaiah 11:2 in connection with the Messiah: the spirit of the Lord, the Spirit of wisdom, the spirit of understanding, the spirit of counsel, the spirit of might, the spirit of knowledge and the spirit of the fear of the Lord. These “spirits” are undoubtedly symbols of the intense power of insight and judgment with which the Lamb [ Jesus]will judge and reign over the earth during the Millennium...
@Justadudeman22 Жыл бұрын
Can you go more in depth on the "article" in the Greek? Thank you for your work.
@youngknowledgeseeker Жыл бұрын
The definite article ("the") would much more strongly, if not definitively, indicate that you are making a direct and literal ontological connection. Example: The word was "the" God. - in this sentence, in Greek, you would be saying, literally, the word was the same person and thing as God because you specify with "the". However without the definite article --> Example: The word was God - Without the definite article, in Greek, it is more likely a comparison of like attributes or qualities is being Madd. This would mean something like the word was "like" God, or as the ESV puts it "What God was the word was". It's like if i said Suzy was like her Mother. Similar personality, similar looks, similar habits etc, but they were not literally the same person. As a fact of grammar of the Greek language it is entirely significant and cause for eyebrow raise that John deliberately did not use the definite article which he easily could have and there would have been no debate as to what he meant. To be honest, beyond this simple grammatical matter, the concept of "God's word" (and by extension his "wisdom", his "plans", his "glory", his "self expression) in its 1st century Jewish context has a higher relevance to this discussion. God's word was an established concept in the time of John in Jewish thought (Logos was also an established concept in hellenistic thought as well, whether diaspora Jews or Gentile Greek).
@Aquadood23 Жыл бұрын
Don'tConvert2Islam did a good video on the article titled, "Is Jesus God? John 1:1"
@shanebell251410 ай бұрын
"And the word was God", quite simple really, hard to deny.
@biblicalunitarian10 ай бұрын
That is an English Translation, not what the Greek means, as I demonstrated in the video, and as some Trinitarian scholars admit. If you think the Word = God, who is God in the phrase the Word was with God? This would mean 'God was with God' in your view. Respectfully, This makes no sense.
@shanebell251410 ай бұрын
@@biblicalunitarian I have looked up the Greek, the Greek does not say "a God", it says "God". God was with God, of course, as both the Father and the Son are God, not a god each. It is up to God what makes sense, not us.
@hjc14029 ай бұрын
@@biblicalunitarianyou appealed to Wallace but Greek scholars like Wallace and mounce actually make the exact opposite point than you. They point out that it is precisely the difference in the use of the article that makes the first instance of ton theon refer to the Father and the second instance of theos refer to God proper, the substance of God, the “what-ness” of God.
@biblicalunitarian9 ай бұрын
@hjc1402 yes, of course they come to different conclusions, because they are Trinitarians. I am saying that Philip Harner who did the study (and Wallace) who cited it, admit that when you remove the article it makes it qualitative. Now, how exactly you take the meaning of 'qualitative' likely depends on your theology. I take it to mean 'godly', or 'divine'. Wallace said he would prefer to translate it "divine" meaning something close to what you said. I am truly not trying to misrepresent Wallace, but this is what you have to do in scholarship, you don't have to come to the exact same conclusions as every person you cite, but you can use portions of what they cite that you agree with to make an argument. I have a genuine question because you seem to know your stuff. Do you agree that there is one God? And I suppose you do. How does Jesus (who is God in your view) have a God (John 20:17)? Does this not make two Gods?
@hjc14029 ай бұрын
@@biblicalunitarian I appreciate the kind demeanor. I’m going to respectively give you some pushback. It seems you’re reducing theos down to an adjectival value. You’re saying the Word is god-ly, or “god-like”. But that’s not what the Greek is saying. This is not being used as an adjective. The qualitative emphasis comes from theos being thrown to the front of the word order. Both nouns are nominatives here, affectively making the verb ēn an equal sign between the two nouns. This thing _is_ that thing. This thing _equals_ that thing. This thing _is_ (in fact) a one-to-one correspondence to that thing. Again, the qualitative emphasis is drawing attention to the what-ness of the noun, not the likeness. It is not pushing it to function as an adjective to say the Word is _like_ this thing. I’ll go ahead and point out that if John wanted to say the Word was god-ly or _like_ God, there was a word for that he could have used but didn’t, theios. That’s a very important point in this discussion. That’s the kind of difference between the trinitarians saying Jesus _is_ the _same_ substance as the Father (homoousios) and the Arians saying he is _like_ the substance of the Father (homoiousios). No, John uses theos to say that the what-ness of God _is_ the Word, and vice versa. That’s why the one translation is accurate. What God is the Word is. This is saying much much more than simply the Word is “godly” or like God- like this other thing that is God but not actually that thing God. Now if this is how the text must be taken, which I think it is, you attempt to introduce a tension between 1: 1b and 1: 1c, asking how the Word can both be _with_ God and _be_ God. But truly, anyone who does not hold to trinitarianism is the one with this problem. The trinitarian is the only one who can and does hold both of these truths without any tension or problem. The trinitarian is the only one who can make sense of the fact that there truly is a real identity between the Word and God, with God being the what-ness of God, and yet there also truly is some sort of real distinction between the Word and God, with “the God” functioning as a proper, personal title referring to the Father. Only trinitarians are staying true to the fullness of the text. This verse achieves 1) identifying a real distinction between the person of the Word and the person of God the Father, fighting off Sabellianism/Modalism, 2) identifying the real identity between the Word and God, fighting off Unitarianism, and 3) _not_ identifying the Word to be “a” god or a lesser god, fighting off Arianism/Jehovah Witnesses/Polytheism.
@AndyAyala-10 ай бұрын
Paul was Saul. If I was a Jew writing or reading John 1:1, knowing the Old Testament repeatedly says “the Word came to ___”, I would read John 1:1 seeing that John isn’t separating the Word from God. Instead, I’d see John gathering my understanding of the Word to the person of God. Something like “with God because he was God”. John is connecting not separating here.
@timothytmusgrove8 ай бұрын
No, it is written this way in Greek to affirm that what God is in substance/essence, so is the WORD (Christ Jesus) - the meaning is clear: GOD. Christ on a White Horse Revelation 19:11 Now I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse. And He who sat on him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He judges and makes war. 12 His eyes were like a flame of fire, and on His head were many crowns. He had a name written that no one knew except Himself. 13 He was clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is called The Word of God. 14 And the armies in heaven, clothed in fine linen, white and clean, followed Him on white horses. 15 Now out of His mouth goes a sharp sword, that with it He should strike the nations. And He Himself will rule them with a rod of iron. He Himself treads the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. 16 And He has on His robe and on His thigh a name written: KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS.
@DoulosTis7 ай бұрын
You are just you, the average Joe in 2024, just that!
@AndyAyala-7 ай бұрын
@@timothytmusgrove you said no.. but than said what said just in different words lol. “What God is so is the Word”…
@timothytmusgrove7 ай бұрын
@@AndyAyala- To be more precise, John wrote it this way to refute any misunderstandings about the ONENESS of GOD. This is because some heresies were beginning to be taught like modalism and Tritheism. So the catechism of the Catholic Church properly defines Christ Jesus revelation as follows: 253. "The Trinity is One. We do not confess three Gods, but one God in three persons, the 'consubstantial Trinity'. [Council of Constantinople II (553): DS 421.] The divine persons do not share the one divinity among themselves but each of them is God whole and entire: 'The Father is that which the Son is, the Son that which the Father is, the Father and the Son that which the Holy Spirit is, i.e. by nature one God.' [Council of Toledo XI (675): DS 530:26.] In the words of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), 'Each of the persons is that supreme reality, viz., the divine substance, essence or nature.' [Lateran Council IV (1215): DS 804.]" 254. "The divine persons are really distinct from one another. 'God is one but not solitary.' [Fides Damasi: DS 71.] 'Father', 'Son', 'Holy Spirit' are not simply names designating modalities of the divine being, for they are really distinct from one another: 'He is not the Father who is the Son, nor is the Son he who is the Father, nor is the Holy Spirit he who is the Father or the Son.' [Council of Toledo XI (675): DS 530:25.] They are distinct from one another in their relations of origin: 'It is the Father who generates, the Son who is begotten, and the Holy Spirit who proceeds.' [Lateran Council IV (1215): DS 804.] The divine Unity is Triune." 255. "The divine persons are relative to one another. Because it does not divide the divine unity, the real distinction of the persons from one another resides solely in the relationships which relate them to one another: 'In the relational names of the persons the Father is related to the Son, the Son to the Father, and the Holy Spirit to both. While they are called three persons in view of their relations, we believe in one nature or substance.' [Council of Toledo XI (675): DS 528.] Indeed 'everything (in them) is one where there is no opposition of relationship.' [Council of Florence (1442): DS 1330.] 'Because of that unity the Father is wholly in the Son and wholly in the Holy Spirit; the Son is wholly in the Father and wholly in the Holy Spirit; the Holy Spirit is wholly in the Father and wholly in the Son.' [Council of Florence (1442): DS 1331.]" Yes, I agree with your statement, I was just trying to clarify The SON OF GOD (the WORD made flesh) is fully human, fully divine: One Divine Person of Jesus Christ. I apologize if I failed to make myself clear. Peace Be With You
@timothytmusgrove7 ай бұрын
@@AndyAyala- Do you believe in the Trinity?
@danielwiroutomo844410 ай бұрын
Sorry I'm catholic from indonesia .Honestly I'm not a very religious person ,but Jesus said : " I and Father are One " " Whoever has seen Me , has seen the Father ". How about that bro ?
@IIAzimaII8 ай бұрын
John 17:21 that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me.
@CherryBlossom8317 ай бұрын
When Jesus is saying that, he’s showing how they are oneness in mindset and personality. For example, my son is EXACTLY like me, like in the way he looks and acts. And people say “oh all I see is your father” when they’re talking to my son. So it’s in the same sense.
@priscillajervey83456 ай бұрын
Seriously??!! You have really taken a simplistic approch to those verses. Jesus was saying he is the visible image of the invisible God, he representened him in every way, he stood in his "stead." Jesus ALSO told the disciples to become one just as he and the father were one - one in goal, mindset same purpose etc, Have you never heard when a couple gets married they are told to become one??? Please use your common sense. Doesn't any kind of team work require they become one in purpose and a goal?? No wonder you have no clear understanding, you have a Catholic background. The Trinity is the :stillborn: child of the Catholic church.
@priscillajervey83456 ай бұрын
Jesus had a genealogy and is written about in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke. Jesus being the Messiah was also called the son of David. in Matt 9:27 and again in Matt 21:9. Paul also calls Jesus as a descendant of David in Rom 1:3 The eternal God simply does not have a lineage or human ancestry it would be absurd to think a descendant of David is God or vice-versa. Jesus had a mother. The Bible makes it clear in numerous passages that a woman Mary is the mother of Jesus for example Matt 2:11-13,14. In Acts 1:14 as obvious as it may sound the mother-son relationship between Mary and Jesus is by far one of the most potent arguments against Jesus godhood. If Christians insist Jesus was God then it logically follows that they must accept Mary as the mother of God. The truth is that Mary did not give birth to anything other than a mortal human being. Jesus was likened to Adam in Rom 5:15 Paul likens Jesus to Adam the first man by writing quote “for if the many died by the trespass of the one man how much more did God's grace and a gift that came by the grace of the one man Jesus Christ”. Obviously the man in the first part of the verse refers to Adam whose sin supposedly caused death to enter the world and later in 1 Cor 15:45 Paul calls Jesus the last Adam. If Jesus was God why would Paul liken God the Son to Adam a being that God created? Jesus ate and drank in Matt 11:19 Jesus says he came eating and drinking how can a man who ate and drank be God, does God eat and drink? Jesus felt hunger and thirst, Jesus felt hungry we read yhis in John 19:28 we read that Jesus while on the cross felt thirsty God obviously does not feel hungry or thirsty. God has no needs and since Jesus felt hunger and thirst He was a human like us. He could not have been God. Jesus called himself a man in John 8:40. Jesus himself states he is a man who speaks what he hears from God, no different from previous prophets. The trinitarian claim that Jesus was fully God and fully man has no foundation in the Bible. Jesus was seen as a prophet in Matt 21:46. Jesus was seen as a human prophet the Israelites always understood prophets as mortal human messengers of God who were not in any way divine. Jesus was a human mediator 1Tim 2:5 makes it clear that there is one God and Jesus is only a man who mediates between God and mankind. Jesus was a man with god-given authority in Matt 9:8 we read that Jesus was a man whose authority and power came from God. Jesus reiterates the same point in many other passages. Jesus was accredited and appointed by God in Acts 2:22 we read Jesus of Nazareth was a man accredited by God. Later in Acts 17:31 Jesus is said to be a man who was appointed by God. In the past God accredited and appointed many prophets to carry out various tasks that does not make the prophets divine. The same applies to Jesus he was not God himself but rather an agent of God. Jesus is called a son of man in Mark 8:31, Mark 2:10, Matt 9:6 and Luke 5:24 Jesus is called the Son of Man which was a phrase applied to humans in the Old Testament. Why would God ever be a son of man? God in the Old Testament categorically denies being a man or a son of man there is no question of a son of man being God Num 23:19. Jesus was subordinate to God. We see this in Rom 15:6, 2 Cor 11:31, Eph 1:3,17 Eph 3:14 and Col 13:3. The New Testament routinely states that God and Jesus are separate persons and that God is also the God of Jesus. This refutes the notion that Jesus is God or in any way co-equal with God. In 1 Cor 11:3 Paul teaches that God is superior to Christ how then can people insist that Jesus is himself God. Jesus taught to worship and pray to God in several instances. Jesus directed all worship only to God who he called the Father and not to himself. In Matt 4:10 Jesus rebukes Satan by saying worship the Lord your God and serve him only, then in Matt 6:6 Jesus instructs his followers to pray to the Father not the son or the Holy Spirit. Then in John 4:23 Jesus says the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth. Very clearly Jesus never demanded worship for himself instead his message was to worship the Father Jesus submitted to God's will in Matt 26:39 Jesus prayed to God and ends by saying: “yet not as I will but as you will.” Heb 5:7 also highlights Jesus submission to God. God is sovereign and submits to nobody, Jesus on the other hand submits to the will of God which demonstrates that Jesus was subordinate to God and therefore could not have been God in any way or form. Jesus emphasized doing the will of God and not his own this is made clear in John 4:34, Matt 7:21 and John 6:28. Jesus found it important to do the will of God and taught the same to others. Jesus said God is greater than him, we read this in John 14:28 where he declares and quote “the Father is greater than I” this notion is repeated in John 10:29. We see here that there is nobody greater than God and Jesus who plainly states that the Father is greater than him and he was not God. Jesus was circumcised according to the law in Luke 2:21 Jesus was circumcised on the eighth day like any other Israelite child. As per Israelite law Jesus kept the sign of the physical covenant God made with Abraham. Jesus was presented to God according to the law, again like any other Israelite firstborn Jesus was presented to God in the temple we read this in Luke 2:22. Mary and Joseph were simply keeping the commands that God gave to the Israelites. Jesus affirmed the Shema in Mark 12:29, Jesus affirmed the Shema which is the Israelite statement of faith in one God. Jesus who was an Israelite himself said that the Shema is the most important of all commandments. Jesus did not attempt to modify it so as to accommodate a trinity or his own supposed godhood. How then do trinitarian see the trinity and Jesus godhood in the Shema?
@priscillajervey83456 ай бұрын
@Bible-Christian All Trinitarians. They state clearly that Jesus IS God - you know the three persons in one God. The Nicea creed! Have you been under a rock? All mainstream churches are Trinitarians - Jesus is God! The Trinity "mystery".
@guate4 Жыл бұрын
Excellent. Another issue, for me at least, is which beginning : of the creation or of the gospel?
@biblicalunitarian Жыл бұрын
We are currently working on our commentary on John 1 in the REV and will update it fairly soon. We answer that question. Keep an eye out! www.revisedenglishversion.com/John/1/1
@nabbosaedith4119 Жыл бұрын
@@biblicalunitarian eargely waiting, am blessed with the REV and the commentary... GOD bless you really good.
@edschaefer6597 Жыл бұрын
Do you even know what the gospel is?
@edschaefer659710 ай бұрын
@@MichaelTheophilus906 Unitarians have more of a problem than claiming that Jesus Christ isn’t part of the Godhead [Read Colossians 2:9]. They also have a problem with sin. Since the Fall, there is enmity between God and mankind. And everybody sins: For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. Being justified freely by his grace [unmerited favor] through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus. whom God set forth as a propitiation by His blood, through faith, to demonstrate His righteousness, because in His forbearance God had passed over the sins that were previously committed. Romans, a 3:23-25 If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us 1john 1:8 And again: For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures 1Corinthians 15:3-5 The blood of Jesus Christ has the power to atone for and cover all the sins: Knowing that you were not redeemed with corruptible things, like silver or gold, from your aimless conduct received by tradition from your fathers, but with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot. 1 Peter 1:18-19 and from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the firstborn from the dead, and the ruler over the kings of the earth. To Him who loved us and washed us from our sins in His own blood and has made us kings and priests to His God and Father, to Him be glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen. Revelation 1:5 This one verse summarizes the Gospel of Jesus Christ: In Him [meaning Jesus] we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of His grace Ephesians 1:7 Everyone must stand before the Judgement seat of Christ where Christ will ask what justifies you to stand before Him. This had best be your answer: Much more then, having now been justified by His blood, we shall be saved from wrath through Him. Romans 5:9
@lucycarin Жыл бұрын
Growing up with a song stuck in every sunday service seems like, god in 3 persons…it wasnt until I was in a college logic class that…wait a minute…🧐 and then having the ability to take a real good class at the time called power for abundant living, had me a changed person and still enjoy life…,✌🏼🕊
@MichaelTheophilus906 Жыл бұрын
Logic should be a required class for all high school students, and Advanced Logic for college students.
@priscillajervey834511 ай бұрын
How right you are!@@MichaelTheophilus906
@neweyz339610 ай бұрын
It would be Nice if the Captions were always TURNED On Though ! Thanks !
@56754923 ай бұрын
I don't think Jesus last words were " Oh myself why hast I forsaken myself " .
@mariomene2051 Жыл бұрын
As I said before, I'm open to the idea, and I like this presentation, because it seems to make sense of John 1. I kind of think Jesus is the perfect image of God. He can explain God to us. I'm still unsure where that puts everything, because, again, God is husband to His people, And Christ is husband to God's people. There are so many questions to ask God about.
@Servant44 Жыл бұрын
Philippians 2:6 KJV [6] who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:
@mariomene2051 Жыл бұрын
@HalleluYAH7773 Jn 8 isn't convincing. They asked, "And who are you?" He answers, "The same as I've been telling you from the start. ... When you raise me up you'll know I am he, and I can do nothing on my own..." Unless they believe Jesus is the manner in which God saves humanity, they will die in their sins.
@mariomene2051 Жыл бұрын
@@Servant44When something is equal to God, doesn't that mean God is one thing, and they are something else, but having equality with that God? Yet, how can anything have equality with God? It's difficult.
@Servant44 Жыл бұрын
@@mariomene2051 🙏 To preach Repentance and Remission of sins to Everyone, All nations Luke 24:47 KJV and that [repentance] and [remission of sins] should be [preached] in his name among [all nations,] beginning at Jerusalem. - Sincere turn from (practice) of (sin) and (willful sin) or (All) will perish Luke 13:3 KJV I tell you, [Nay:] but, except [ye repent,] ye shall [all] [likewise] [perish.] - Believe for your faith will save you, for believing leads to (pardon of sins) to not (die) in (sin) John 8:24 KJV I said therefore unto you, that [ye shall die] in your sins: for [if ye believe not] that I am he, ye shall [die] in your [sins.] - Receive forgiveness of sins when we are converted, + multiple ways for remission of sins, (pardon of sins) Acts 10:43 KJV To him give all the prophets witness, that through his [name] [whosoever believeth] [in him] shall [receive] [remission of sins.] - Love God and love thy neighbor as thyself, for love will (cover) all sins, (pardon of sins) Proverbs 10:12 KJV Hatred stirreth up strifes: but [love] [covereth] all [sins.] Luke 7:47 KJV Wherefore I say unto thee, [Her sins,] which [are many,] [are forgiven;] for [she loved much:] but to whom [little is forgiven,] the same [loveth little.] - Have frevernt (love) among (the brethren) and (the people) for frevernt (love,) giving, having conpassion shall (cover) the multitude of sins, (pardon of sins) 1 Peter 4:8 KJV And above all things have fervent [charity] [among yourselves:] for [charity] shall [cover] the [multitude of sins.] - Preaching and (converting the sinner) from the error of his way will (hide) a multitude of sins, (pardon of sins) James 5:20 KJV Let him know, that he which [converteth] the sinner from the [error of his way] shall save a [soul] from [death,] and shall [hide] a [multitude of sins.] - Confession of sin, confess your sins everyday for the forgiveness of sins, (pardon of sins) 1 John 1:9 KJV If we [confess] our sins, he is faithful and just to [forgive] us [our sins,] and to [cleanse us] from all [unrighteousness.] - (Water baptism) for the (remission of sins), remission/pardon/forgiveness of sins Acts 2:38 KJV Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be [baptized] every one of you in the [name] of [Jesus Christ] for the [remission of sins,] and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. - To give knowledge of salvation to all by the (remission) of (our) (sins), (pardon of sins) Luke 1:77 KJV To give [knowledge] of [salvation] unto his people [by] the [remission] of their [sins,] - Those (predestined), will die in (0 sin,) all sins were pardoned by the (remission of sins) Matthew 24:13 KJV [13] But he that shall [endure] unto [the end,] the same [shall be saved.]
@rickyzoe1 Жыл бұрын
@@mariomene2051 I was in the same place you are several years ago. You have every right to ask the hard questions and test how you understand scriptures regarding who our Messiah is. I for one admire your courage and want to encourage you to continue on this path.
@kevingeorge1095 Жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation, in just 10 minutes. That's not easy for this passage. Good job.
@homielifesaver233211 ай бұрын
But he is wrong. Acts 20:28 Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with (HIS OWN BLOOD) How did God purchase the church? With his own blood. ---------- How can Jesus be God and the Father be God too, but we have one God? Genesis 2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and THEY SHALL BE ONE FLESH. So two persons can share in unity as one. And the Trinity share one essence in three persons.
In Jn.8:48, Jesus says, "If don't believe that I am He, you will die in your sins.". Would like die in your sins❓
@kevingeorge10959 ай бұрын
@@MathewThomasFET The "I am He" is a code reference to claiming to be the Messiah. If they do not believe that Jesus is God's Messiah, then they will die in their errors, as a result of their rebellion, which is exactly what happened. It has nothing to do with some atonement payment idea - that concept did not even exist in those days.
@MathewThomasFET9 ай бұрын
@@kevingeorge1095 What are the Greek words of the New Testament that say, “I am He”.❓Where else in the Bible do you find these words ❓ And who said them ❓
@dboulos7 Жыл бұрын
Excellent expounding of the text. What is amazing, as you pointed out, and that is so prevalent in all trinitarian tenets, is that it just doesn't logically work in trinitarian terms. It's not like to say that yours is a better explanation than the god-man theory, but rather that the trinitarian view is not even a viable exegesis. Why do the trinitarians keep the blinders on, and do it so tenaciously - Nicaea destroyed the Church.
@sherrilsusic Жыл бұрын
When jesus is being crucified if he was God WHY would he pray to himself and say "Father forgive tem they know not what they do" or john 3 16 For god so loved the world that he gave his ONLY BEGOTTEN SONthat whoso ever believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life.John 3 verse 17,18. John 5 39 John 8 verse 28, 29
@priscillajervey834511 ай бұрын
They certainly did, and the blind sheep have been following so meekley - no questions asked. What a shame. Truth is, they all want to follow the herd, to be accepted and not make waves even though they know the Trinity don't make sense they accept it anyway.
@homielifesaver23329 ай бұрын
Acts 20:28 Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased (WITH HIS OWN BLOOD) How did God purchase the church? With his own blood. --------- Isaiah 44:24 Thus saith the Lord, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, (I AM THE LORD) that maketh (ALL THINGS); that stretched forth the heavens (ALONE); that spreadeth forth the earth by myself. God created everything Alone. Colossians 1:16 For by him all things are created, that are in heaven, and that are in the earth, visible and invisible, weather they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: (ALL THINGS) were created (BY HIM), and for him: So how in Isaiah God created all things, but in Colossians Jesus created all things? Because Jesus is part of the Trinity. ---------- John 8:18 Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself (EQUAL) with God. Notice the context, that it is the author that agrees with the Jews, that Jesus is equal with the Father. John 5:23 That all men should honor the Son, even as they honor the Father. He that honors not the Son honors not the Father which hath sent him. Honor the Son even as we honor the Father? How do we honor the Father? We worship him. ------- Begotten doesn’t always mean created in the Bible. Example Hebrews 11:17 By faith Abraham, when he was tried, offered up Isaac: and he that had received the promises offered up his only BEGOTTEN son, Was Isaac Abraham’s only son? No, because he also had Ishmael. So how is this possible? The word that translates to begotten (monogenes) means unique. So Jesus is the only UNIQUE son of God. -------- And there is plenty more arguments that show that Jesus is God along with the Father and Holy Ghost.
@dboulos79 ай бұрын
@@homielifesaver2332 There's no such thing as a god-man. God did not sacrifice Himself, to Himself. God cannot die. God cannot live a perfect by obeying and loving Himself. It is the quintessence of redundancy to have two all powerful persons within the universe, let alone three - one is not in need of the others. Nowhere in the Bible do the following words exist: god-the-son, god-the-holy-spirit, god-man, three-in-one, two-in one, hypostatic union, eternal generation, incarnation, trinity, triune, etc.... God is called the Father over 100 times in the New Testament, and never the son or the spirit. Although only begotten may not always mean conceived, you haven't proven that it doesn't mean so in regard to Jesus - because it does. Just because the Jews thought that Jesus was making himself equal to God, obviously doesn't mean that he was - he wasn't, for he stated countless times that he can do nothing without the Father. Jesus did not create anything - it doesn't take two omnipotent persons to create the universe - one is more than enough. Your trinitarian doctrine is nothing more than diabolical nonsense, from start unto finish.
@homielifesaver23329 ай бұрын
@@dboulos7 Isaiah 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, (THE MIGHTY GOD), the everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace. So the child is the MIGHTY GOD? You haven’t proven that begotten does mean created in Jesus’s case either. --------- Jesus left his glory behind in heaven with the Father when he took on flesh (John 17:5) In (Philippians 2:6-8) shows that even though Jesus is equal to God, he wouldn’t use it to his advantage, Because he had to beat sin with the same weaknesses as a human would. And that is why Jesus said he couldn’t do anything on his own, and why he said the Father was greater than himself. Because he left his glory in heaven and took on the role of a servant. Jesus didn’t create anything? (Colossians 1:15-16) (John 1:1-3) (Hebrews 1:8-10) also God calls Jesus God in these verses.
@HosannaIntheHighest-ri1lq3 ай бұрын
The Father is God & the son is an anointed one & the set apart spirit is an anointed one.
@trich1033 ай бұрын
John 10:30 I and the father are one
@biblicalunitarian3 ай бұрын
"I and the Father are one" is one in purpose, not in essence. Because we too are called to be "one" with Jesus and his Father (John 17:21).
@trich1033 ай бұрын
@@biblicalunitarian explain john 17:5 brother. How did Jesus share glory with the Father before the world existed?
@biblicalunitarian3 ай бұрын
Even if John 17:5 was interpreted as literal pre-existence, that would prove Arianism, but certainly would not prove Trinitarianism. Respectfully, I addressed your points, how do you reconcile the fact that in John 17:3 Jesus said his father is the ONLY true God (to the exclusion of himself) with Trinitarianism? If Jesus wanted to teach Unitarian, do you think he could have been any clearer?
@trich1033 ай бұрын
@@biblicalunitarian well you're saying it proves arianism, only bc the trinity is not an option in your mind. As for 17:3, you have to read Philipians 2:6. Although he was in the form of God, he did not count equality with God as a thing to be grasped. Idk man, for me, when you look at his actions and the things he said, how could he not be God. We know men can't pre-exist, so you bring up Arianism, which would make you a jehovah witness. Idt you are, you're throwing out a theory to make 17:5 makes sense. Jesus also forgave sins, said anything you pray for to the Father in MY NAME will be given, said he has the ability to give eternal life, said he will come back and judge the world. Even in 17:3, he's saying to have eternal life is to know the Father and ME. How can a man say these types of things. If he's not God, it's blasphemous. I'm happy to dive into theology to make my points, but on its surface, how could he not be God
@maxspringer01 Жыл бұрын
I agree with the Biblical Unitarian perspective on the Trinity and that the one true God is the Father, but as far as Trinitarians explaining John 1:1, they would just say the first "God" is God the Father, and the second "God" is God the Son who is Himself God (in their view). John's prologue, as you said, is the first place they go to support their belief. What helped me the most with this was to determine whether John 1 is a reference to the Genesis 1 creation or not, and then to look at the creation account to see what the "word" could be in that account. It is abundantly obvious that it is simply God's speaking, i.e. "Let there be..." John says all things that came to be (greek: egeneto) came to be through the word, and that's exactly what happened in Genesis - all things that came to be (same greek word egeneto in the Septuagint), came to be through God's spoken word saying "let there be". Mankind is not described as "coming to be", but is described as being formed from the dust of the ground, and so did not come to be through the word. There is no indication in Genesis that God's speaking is somehow also a divine person. It's just God's actual spoken word. My personal perspective is that Jesus is the "light" spoken into being both in Genesis and in John (since the gospel says John the Baptist came to testify concerning the light, Greek: phos). The "light" spoken into being in Genesis 1:3 is also "phos" in the Septuagint, which is a different word for "light" used later on in Genesis 1:14 when God speaks the lights of the sky (what we all commonly understand as our physical light today) into being.
@Gats84797 ай бұрын
LET US MAKE MAN ACCORDING TO OUR IMAGE OUR LIKENESS THERE YOU CAN SEE HE'S SPEAKING TO SOMEONE.
@spacenewskids..5306 Жыл бұрын
I believe God the Father is the one and only God... God is holy and he is a spirit...so God the Father himself is the hly spirit Jesus was a man approved of God . He was sent by God as a goodd human teacher to guide Israelites... that it....he is not God at all Jesus is refered to as son of God...but he himself says in Matthew that all peacemakers and righteous human beings can be called sons and daughters of God. He is also called sons on man..the book of numbers say that God is neither a man not a son of man Hence I believe the Father/ Holy spirit is the only one true God and Jesus was a prophet...
@manifestemanifeste81486 ай бұрын
Isaiah 9:6 (NIV). Prophecy about Jesus.
@ajaxzaya09914 ай бұрын
@@manifestemanifeste8148That's Jesus Theophoric name, go see the Hebrews translation
@trich1033 ай бұрын
Jesus is not saying he's a son of a man. He's saying he's the Son of Man, a title and divine figure prohesised in Daniel7:13, who would be given by the Ancient of Days(God the Father) power, glory, dominion, and an Everlasting Kingdom.
@pmac_4 ай бұрын
There is a much simpler explanation. John was writing to a Jewish audience. We should not take the Greek meaning for logos, but a Jewish one. For Jews the "the word" was " the *spoken* word". In the beginning was the *spoken* word ("and God said"), and the word was with (toward) God and the word was God *speaking* . The Greek "toward" reminds us that when God speaks it is like a boomerang, coming back toward him in glory, fulfilling that to which it was sent.
@djaconetta2 ай бұрын
Absolutely not true you don't know what you're talking about. The word logos has only one meaning regardless. You have absolutely wrote the wrong meeting to these words. I will give you a Greek expert to explain the exegesis of this verse. You are way off.kzbin.info/www/bejne/gneqfItqpK-fm8k. kzbin.info/www/bejne/r5CUXoigpraYg9k
@djaconetta2 ай бұрын
By the way, you can ignore these experts, but if you really want to get to the truth of exactly what first John 1:1 says you always listen to both of them
@julioguadalupe6935 Жыл бұрын
Lotta comments trying to disqualify this understanding of Jesus by saying the content creator is an unqualified man. Wasn’t the trinity created by men? Any person reading scripture that isn’t coached into “seeing” the trinity would see Jesus as the Messiah, God as the Father and the Holy Spirit as God’s Spirit. Why do we need to qualify God’s grace and Jesus’ sacrifice by raising him to godhood. All worship to Jesus is to the Father, honoring the Son honors the Father. God has made new covenants before (hence why we usually don’t hold most of Old Testament Law) so I see no issue with God commanding us to honor his Son whom by being a perfect servant and sacrifice was exalted to His Right Hand.
@homielifesaver23329 ай бұрын
(Acts 20:28) Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God which he hath purchased (WITH HIS OWN BLOOD). Whose blood purchased the church? God’s blood purchased the church. --------- (Isaiah 9:6) For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, (THE MIGHTY GOD), the everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace. The Son that is given is the MIGHTY GOD? Who is the Son? Jesus. -------- (Isaiah 44:24) Thus saith the Lord, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the Lord that maketh all things; that stretched forth the heavens ALONE; that spreadeth abroad the earth BY MYSELF. So God created everything by himself alone. (Colossians 1:16) For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in the earth, visible and invisible, weather they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were CREATED BY HIM, and for him: So all things were created by Jesus? Yes, and (Isaiah 44:24) tells us God created everything alone. So Jesus created all things, and it is God that created all things alone. ---------- Anyone who reads the Bible with diligence is forced into believing that God Is Trinity without being coached.
@priscillajervey83459 ай бұрын
Sometimes I think Trinitarians don't want the truth, don't care either way. I loaned a member of my church the book "The Jesus Wars" and later asked what he thought regarding the nature of God and Jesus? He shoot back "It really don't make a difference!" There you have it! The majority don't think it matters and don't care! By the way I was asked to leave that church, it was asserted that I was upsetting the brethren! The "powers that be" are responsibile for so much theological illiteracy in the churches. The false prophets [ in the pulpits] are running lose in Christianity.
@homielifesaver23329 ай бұрын
@@priscillajervey8345 You gave no arguments in your paragraph as to why the Trinity is wrong, and I have never heard of that book you got them to read, but what ever the book says doesn’t matter if it contradicts the Bible. Also if someone was going around the church trying to teach false doctrine, the church should ask them to leave. If you give arguments from the Bible, then we can have a conversation, but if you say some book has more authority than the Bible, well that is a conversation ending argument.
@Gats84797 ай бұрын
@@priscillajervey8345tried to understand Acts 20:28 Church of God purchasen by his own blood who did sacrifice on the cross?
@priscillajervey83456 ай бұрын
The Trinity is nowhere in the Bible nor is "God the Son, or the God-man" All manufactured by man! What a pity that so many adhere to such absuridy as the " mystery" trinity. No wonder it is acceptd as a mystery, no one can explain it even it's most ardent defenders.
@hectorm.bordonada17613 ай бұрын
This is why Isaiah 46:9 says: (Isaiah 46:9) Remember what happened long ago, for I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is none like Me.) As we know there is no one that can be like God nor is God like anyone else.🙌🏽💪🏽 4:54
@BlakeCoulter7773 ай бұрын
Isaiah 46:9 highlights God’s uniqueness, stating that there is no one like Him. This makes perfect sense in light of the New Testament teachings that Jesus is the exact representation of God (Hebrews 1:3) and that seeing Him is seeing the Father (John 14:9). If Jesus is the exact replication of God, then His divine nature affirms that He is indeed God. The uniqueness of God proclaimed in Isaiah supports the idea that Jesus, as part of the Trinity, shares in that divine essence, thus making both statements harmonious rather than contradictory. In other words, if Jesus is not God, then Isaiah 46:9 would be inaccurate, as it claims there is no one like Him.
@hectorm.bordonada17613 ай бұрын
@@BlakeCoulter777 I’m not sure you’re understanding the scripture in its context my dear friend, there can never be a replica of God nor any one equal to Him, it makes no sense to even say that because when the scriptures tell you, that Moses says in (Deuteronomy 18:15-20) 15. “The Lord your God will raise up for you a Prophet like “me” (meaning like Moses) from your midst, from your brethren. Him you shall hear, 16. “according to all you desired of the Lord your God in Horeb in the day of the assembly, saying, let me not hear again the voice of the Lord my God, nor let me see this great fire anymore, lest I die.’ 17. And the Lord said to me: ‘What they have spoken is good. 18. ‘I will rise up for them a Prophet like you from among their brethren, and will put my words in His mouth, and He shall speak to them all that I command Him. (Now this part is key) 19. And it shall be that whoever will not hear My words which He speaks in My name I will require it of Him, 20. ‘But the prophet who presumes to speak a word in My name, which I have not commanded him to speak or who speaks in the name of other gods, that prophet shall die.” And in (Hebrews 1:3) is literally letting you know that the power of God explicitly worked with Christ in a special manner because if you go to (Hebrews 1:13), it will read But to what angels has He (meaning God) said: “Sit at My right hand, Till I make Your enemies Your footstool”? Did you notice that God said “Till I” meaning that there is a time frame that will end at some point. But then again Christ was also in the likeness of Melchizedek (Hebrews 7:14-17) 14. For it is evident that our Lord arose from Judah, of which tribe Moses spoke nothing concerning priesthood. 15. And it is yet far more evident if, in the likeness of Melchizedek, there arises another priest 16. who has come, not according to the law of a fleshly commandment, but according to the power of an endless life. 17. For He testifies: “You are a priest forever, according to the order of Melchizedek.” But then again in (Hebrews 7:28) this is also talking about Jesus, so listen closely, says; (Hebrews 7:28) For the law appoints as high priests men who have weaknesses, but the word of the oath, which came after the law, appoints the Son (Jesus) who has been (PERFECTED) forever.. So then Jesus being “God” needs to be perfected?? And lastly what you wrote about in the book of John may use that verse, but they don’t read the entirety of that verse and its context because you choose to stop at verse 9, but if you continue to read verse 10, you will set why he said this.. (John 14:9-10) 9. Yeshua said to him (meaning Philip), “Have I been with you so long, and yet you have not known Me, Philip? He who has seen me has seen the Father; so how can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? 10. “Do you not believe that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me? The words that I speak to you, I do not speak on My own authority; but the Father who “DWELLS IN ME” (as God dose in us) dose the work. Which is why when God rose Lazarus from the dead Jesus clearly stated that for God to perform this miracle like that, the people that were in his surroundings, would see this and believe that God in fact did send him. Because also as it’s written, it says that God is the one who had risen Christ from the dead and not Christ himself!... Dose God need be raised from the dead by another “god” being (God)??? This trinity topic has been debated for centuries my friend and quite frankly you are not doing well to try and refute the fact that (God) is not 3 persons sharing one title which is (God) without truly saying “gods” and not (God). On another note though, if you believe what (Genesis 1:26) says, then you will notice that it was “They” who created mankind not “Him”! May peace be upon you..🙏🏽
@MichaelIbiloye3 ай бұрын
CLEAR AS DAY! GOD MULTIPLY YOUR BLESSINGS.
@ventin75 Жыл бұрын
Jesus is God. Here's why. John 10:30 - "I and the Father are one." Philippians 2:5-6 - "Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped." John 1:1 - "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." Colossians 2:9 - "For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily." Hebrews 1:8 - "But of the Son he says, 'Your throne, O God, is forever and ever, the scepter of uprightness is the scepter of your kingdom.'" John 20:28 - "Thomas answered him, 'My Lord and my God!'" Titus 2:13 - "Waiting for our blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ." Revelation 1:8 - "I am the Alpha and the Omega," says the Lord God, "who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty."
@Somedude2020 Жыл бұрын
Revelation 1.18 I am the Living One; I was dead and now look, I am alive for ever and ever! The eternal God was "dead" ?
@ventin75 Жыл бұрын
@@Somedude2020 It is refering to Jesus
@Somedude2020 Жыл бұрын
@@ventin75 that's a relief, for a minute there I thought it was referring to God
@ken440 Жыл бұрын
me and my wife are one, in flesh according to the bible, yet we are not the same being. (also in purpose in bring up the kids) And who DID grasp at equality with God? well that ol devil, and the disobedient Adam, but Jesus (last Adam) did NOT grasp at being equal, but went instead to the cross. Obediently, the context of phil2:5-6.
@debraannmartinez7157 Жыл бұрын
Well, God didn't die with JESUS.. Because he doesn't have any human form to do so!
@stevenwebb6253 Жыл бұрын
Exactly, Jesus isn’t God, nor equal to God. He called our God and Father his God and Father at John 20:17. See also: 1 Corinthians 8:4-6 4 Now concerning the eating of food offered to idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world and that there is no God but one. 5 For even though there are so-called gods, whether in heaven or on earth, just as there are many “gods” and many “lords,” 6 there is actually to us one God, the Father, from whom all things are and we for him; and there is one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things are and we through him. And…… John 17:3 “This means everlasting life, their coming to know you, the only true God, and the one whom you sent, Jesus Christ.” The only true God…..
@whiteandblack20054 ай бұрын
@@stevenwebb6253 Congratulations. You're not a Trinitarian and you don't take Jesus as God. We have a common ground on the most important subject - the subject of God. I'm a Muslim. I invite you to reason. Messiah Jesus (peace be upon him) used to reason. Won't you reason?
@twistedtomato97923 ай бұрын
i recommend you check out Philippians 2:5-11. If you deny Jesus being God then you deny the Bible
@whiteandblack20053 ай бұрын
@@twistedtomato9792 Do you realize the seriousness of the matter that your FAITH runs to Philippians but you're unable to back up your FAITH from the preaching and practice of Jesus of the Bible. Thanks to Paul of the Bible the f3r0c10us w0lf in she-ep's clo-thi-ng whom Jesus wa-rn-ed about.
@eliasziad78643 ай бұрын
But what does “Jesus the son of God” mean? Is it metaphorically or physically the son of God? Does God have physical kinship?
@stevenwebb62533 ай бұрын
@@twistedtomato9792 Philippians 2:5,6 The New World Translation puts it this way: “who, although he was existing in God’s form, gave no consideration to a seizure, namely, that he should be equal to God.” King James: “Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:” American Standard Version: “who, existing in the form of God, counted not the being on an equality with God a thing to be grasped,” The Bible in Living English: “who, when he was in the form of God, did not regard equality with God as a prize,” The Emphasized Bible: “Who in form of God subsisting Not a thing to be seized accounted the being equal with God,” Also, Phil 2:5,6 tells us to ‘Keep this mental attitude in you that was also in Christ Jesus, who, although he was existing in God’s form…….’ Based on some interpretations, does that mean that we too are equal with God?
@steveopc814 ай бұрын
“If you have seen me you have seen the Father. I and the Father are 1”
@eyebrow13 ай бұрын
Thats because he was the manifestation of Gods Word. It all started in the garden with His prophecy, throughout the entire old testament, to his birth and his death and resurrection. If we see Jesus we see Him(God)
@technicianbis5250-ig1zdАй бұрын
Jesus is the perfect imitation of God so to see Jesus is to see the creator Father.
@AntAnt-mr7lcАй бұрын
Philippians 2:6
@normanmcdermid195111 ай бұрын
I believe that this scripture has been tampered with by a party who wanted to promote the trinity.
@hjc14029 ай бұрын
At least you admit that it clearly teaches the Trinity and creates major problems for Unitarianism, but now there’s the problem for you that there’s no evidence this was tampered with and the passage is in the earliest manuscripts.
@lingamalinga4795 Жыл бұрын
Point number (3) I meant Exodus 20: 5 Thou shall not bow to other gods, but if you read Philippians 2:11 Every knee should bow and every tongue confess tha Jesus is Lord. I am sorry fingure problem.
@FLDavis7 ай бұрын
John : 1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. 4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men. 5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. Joh 5:17 But Jesus answered them, My Father worketh hitherto, and I work. Jesus Is Equal with God Joh 5:18 Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God. The Authority of the Son Joh 5:19 Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise. Joh 5:20 For the Father loveth the Son, and sheweth him all things that himself doeth: and he will shew him greater works than these, that ye may marvel. Joh 5:21 For as the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them; even so the Son quickeneth whom he will. Joh 5:22 For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son: Philippians 2: 5 Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: 6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: 7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: 8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross. 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: 10 That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; 11 And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Colossians 1:15-20 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things consist. And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence. For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell; And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven. The Rider on a White Horse Rev 19:11 And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. Rev 19:12 His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself. Rev 19:13 And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.
@anthonymanerchia9469 Жыл бұрын
“He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation” Colossians 1:15 John 8:58 “Before Abraham was I am” John 14:9 “…Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father…” John 5:18 “For this reason they tried all the more to kill him; not only was he breaking the Sabbath, but he was even calling God his own Father, making himself equal with God.”
@ken440 Жыл бұрын
What is the context of Colosians? Its the NEW creation, the church led by the man raised, not by angels. Jesus creates all in that new creation, the church because he Jesus IS THE HEAD of the body, the church, the new creation. You have miss used that holy hand grenade anthony.
@debraannmartinez7157 Жыл бұрын
What are you smoking?@@ken440
@debraannmartinez7157 Жыл бұрын
Jesus is High Priest to the CHURCH and not God@@ken440
@ken440 Жыл бұрын
@@debraannmartinez7157 ha ha, can you not see that Colossians is about Jesus being the head of the body, the church?? What do you think its about? Even my MacArthur study bible tells me its about proving that angels are not to be worshipped because Jesus is the head and is the one who sets up and orders things in the church.
@priscillajervey83456 ай бұрын
If Jesus is the image of God then he is definitely Not God! Jesus was before Abraham in the mind and plan of God, God sees things that are not as though they were. Was Jesus crucified before the foundation of the world??? Does calling yourself equal to your mother or father make you equal to them?? Jesus NEVER claimed equality with God the Father. PLEAES STOP WITH THE LAME "I AMs!"You have only proved how theologically ignorant you are of Scriptures, Stop listening to others and do your own research. And believe God and Jesus when they tell you WHO they are. Don't you think they would know???
@InfinitelyManic Жыл бұрын
The Father is nominally called God or has name God. The Word was God is using God in the predicative sense; namely, that the Word was also God, a single divine nature subsisting as Father, Son & Spirit. The Father is uncaused & eternally begot the Word (Son) and eternally spirates the Spirit.
@eliasziad78643 ай бұрын
Yet, the Holy Spirit isn’t even a person in the first place, it’s just the active force of God. Your NT never even hints at the Holy Spirit being “god.” Did your tripolar god forget to explain his nature or was he unable to express himself? Christianity is the worst thing to have happened to the human brain. It breaks your intellect and depends on your ego to fiercely defend a “mysterious trinity” that not even its fervent defenders can explain. You will soon answer for the things that you used to say.
@InfinitelyManic3 ай бұрын
@@eliasziad7864 [ Christianity is the worst thing to have happened to the human brain.] -- Then why are you responding? Why bother w/ Christians given that you are not likely to convert anyone to your theistic worldview??? The Spirit of God has subsistence/hypostasis as the Word/Son of God does. Jn 14:26 ... #He will #teach you all things Jn 15:26 "But when the #Helper comes, whom I shall send to you from the Father, the #Spirit of truth who #proceeds from the Father... An inanimate object or active force does not #speak or #teach or can be #grieved. Eph 4:30 And do not #grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption.
@PCB-dg7pt3 ай бұрын
God has a name, Jehovah or Yahweh
@InfinitelyManic3 ай бұрын
@@PCB-dg7pt Is it illegal to call Him Father???
@danielmueller14432 ай бұрын
@@eliasziad7864how can you blaspheme or lie to an “active force?”
@ms-ex8em7 ай бұрын
jesus prayed to god how can jesus pray to himself it don’t make sense !!
@swenpark85986 ай бұрын
« His not God because he doesn’t act the way I should »
@ms-ex8em6 ай бұрын
@@swenpark8598 what do u mean act the way i should? what do u mean by this?
@swenpark85986 ай бұрын
@@ms-ex8em If something doesn't make sense in your mind, it doesn't necessarily means that it doesn't make sense for the entire world. Jesus was sent to Earth not only as God incarnate but also as the perfect model for humanity. As a man, Jesus demonstrated how each person should live their life, including the practice of prayer. Jesus prayed to God the Father to show humans the importance of prayer in their relationship with God. By praying, he illustrated the humility, dependence, and obedience that every person should have toward God. Jesus' prayer is not a sign of his lack of divinity, but rather a demonstration of his role as a guide and example for all believers.
@ms-ex8em6 ай бұрын
@@swenpark8598 ok i understand this but still we CANNOT attribute these qualities to god i mean things like he became a man etc i dont believe in it all nope i just dont buy it
@swenpark85986 ай бұрын
@@ms-ex8em Okay no problem I totally respect your opinion, you are free to decide your future and your way. But you cannot deny something when you have so much evidence to prove it's true, and even if it doesn't make sense to you, it doesn't mean that it's necessary false. I think you should look at more in detail the life and purpose of Jesus, it will surely help you like it did to me to understand. Have a great day man!
@Ds74-pmrq10 ай бұрын
It would be really great of this channel had bible study videos
@Deb-p4z9sАй бұрын
The little book "Jesus' Biological Father was Joseph: According to the New Testament" (DS WAGGONER) is mind-bending!
@GlowingRedly2 ай бұрын
Colossians 1:15-17 "Jesus is God, qnd everything was created through him and for him."
@anotherxtremepatriot2 ай бұрын
He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation.
@homielifesaver23322 ай бұрын
@@anotherxtremepatriot In ancient Jewish culture the firstborn son was the head of the household. When it called Jesus the firstborn, it doesn’t mean that he was actually born first. It just means he is the head of the church. Look at (Psalms 89:20-27) where it says David will (BE MADE) firstborn. How can David be made firstborn? Because it has nothing to do with actual birth, but position.
@biblicalunitarian2 ай бұрын
Not what it says.
@homielifesaver23322 ай бұрын
@@biblicalunitarian (Psalms 89:20-27) clearly states that God will (MAKE) David firstborn. When was David ever firstborn? He wasn’t until God gave the throne to David (Luke 1:32-33)
@MRFITTA2 ай бұрын
@@biblicalunitarian well it does say that through him all things were created; Things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers, rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him. Meaning he is the creator, of everything
@ajaxzaya09914 ай бұрын
As a Christian, Jesus is not GOD. He is the Son of GOD, the Mediator of God to Mankind
@harveygitarista16004 ай бұрын
The Father is God. Jesus, the Son is God. The Holy Spirit is God. God is one. I say, amen, Lord. Man has no right to contradict the way God make Himself known in the Bible. Repent and believe in the Lord Jesus, our only salvation.
@harveygitarista16004 ай бұрын
The Father is God. Jesus, the Son is God. The Holy Spirit is God. God is one. I say, amen, Lord. Man has no right to contradict the way God make Himself known in the Bible. God is Spirit. God is Eternal. God's Way is not human's way. God is the Creator. God is Holy. Man is a finite, created being who is sinful in his ways in this material created world. There's no way man could cage the Holy God with words and ideas like Unitary or Trinity; just so he could make sense in his head the divine Godhead with his natural experience. God is simply God the way He says so in His Word. Humans can't limit His ways! Humans can't contradict God!
@englerosauro19354 ай бұрын
Amen!
@twistedtomato97923 ай бұрын
What about when Genesis talks about in Genesis 1:26-27 "26 Then God said, 'Let *us* make human beings in *our* image, to be like *us*...' 27 So God created human beings in *his* own image. In the image of *God* he created them; male and female he created them."
@biblicalunitarian3 ай бұрын
Many Trinitarian scholars (I take this viewpoint as well) believe that God is talking to his divine council (of angels). Especially considering that in Genesis 1:27 which you cited a singular verb is used "he created them." So, God is one person not the three persons of the Trinity because the author should have used a plural verb. Also, nowhere does this verse or Genesis 11:7 ("Let us go down") is God explicitly identified as 3. Someone could use this verse to argue that God is 6 persons just as much as you can use it to argue God is three persons.
@twistedtomato97923 ай бұрын
@@biblicalunitarian I see your point of view because I just find it hard to believe when other verses in the bible directly contradict the view of a unitary God. For example do you deny what Paul writes in the book of Philippians when he says in chapter 2 verse 5-11? Paul states directly that he was (and is) God. "5 You must have the same attitude that Christ Jesus had. 6 Though he was God, he did not think of equality with God as something to cling to. 7 Instead, he gave up his divine privileges; he took the humble position of a slave and was born as a human being. When he appeared in human form, 8 he humbled himself in obedience to God and died a criminal's death on a cross. 9 Therefore, God elevated him to the place of highest honor and gave him the name above all other names, 10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, 11 and every tongue declare that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father." Philippians 2:5-11 NLT
@twistedtomato97923 ай бұрын
@@biblicalunitarian I see your point of view, but I find it hard to believe considering what other verses in the bible say. I recommend you check philippians 2:5-11
@MrSamdabeast8 ай бұрын
I was raised being taught that jesus was not god. Never made sense to me. I actually started studying the bible and learn3d that jesus is god. That makes sense. The sacrifice makes sense.
@MrSamdabeast6 ай бұрын
@FrankLee-gq8yc If Jesus is not God, the sacrifice means nothing. It just means God gave us some dude to put up on a cross. The fact that God HIMSELF humbled Himself and became a human to suffer with us, let us nail Him to a cross and spit on Him. That's meaningful. It means God really does love us.
@MrSamdabeast6 ай бұрын
@FrankLee-gq8yc I would encourage you to watch "Mike Winger's" video on the trinity. He pulls straight from scripture. There is too much scripture that contradicts your belief.
@MrSamdabeast6 ай бұрын
@FrankLee-gq8yc These points you are bringing up don't contradict the trinity unfortunately. All of these scriptures can still apply to a multidimensional being.
@MrSamdabeast6 ай бұрын
@FrankLee-gq8yc I don't think anyone exclusively worships Jesus. That would be very strange. It's natural to worship the three dimensions of God. The father, the son, and the holy spirit. God is comprised of these things. If one is missing, everything falls apart.
@eliasziad78643 ай бұрын
Trinitarians bot.
@jdaze1 Жыл бұрын
The "word" is defined as the wisdom of God and the power of God. The word is not a person. But was personified in the gospels when speaking thru the prophet John.
@christinefarrall9391 Жыл бұрын
The Word is a Person. His name is Jesus. He was in the beginning with God before the world was created.
@Somedude2020 Жыл бұрын
@@christinefarrall9391So was Jesus always with the father from eternity making him also eternal?
@chronic_daydreamer Жыл бұрын
@@Somedude2020No. In being called “the only-begotten,” it is clear that he had a beginning. Only the Father is eternal in the absolute sense, without beginning or end, being uncreated. Jesus, being a creation, had a beginning. He is eternal in the sense that he does not have an end. Some linguists call this sempiternal, which can be understood to mean having a beginning but not having an end.
@Somedude2020 Жыл бұрын
@@chronic_daydreamer I agree totally, I was asking in the hope of getting around to revelation 1.18 where Jesus says clearly that he was dead, and NOW is alive for ever. Always interested to hear how trinitarians explain that one
@homielifesaver23329 ай бұрын
@@chronic_daydreamer Begotten in the verse that you are quoting means unique and not created. Example In (Hebrews 11:17) it says that Isaac is Abraham’s only begotten son, but we know that Abraham has another son Ishmael. Begotten in these verses means unique not created.
@MichaelTheophilus906 Жыл бұрын
Look at it from the trinitarian point of view. The Word = Jesus. God = the trinity. In the beginning was Jesus, and Jesus was with the trinity, and Jesus was the trinity.
@socketman Жыл бұрын
Doesn't that just make the point even further? Jesus is clearly not the trinity for trinitarians, the trinity = God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit. I feel like we can't just read scripture and insert our own meaning. The trinity is not a concept found in scripture, so we can't say "Jesus is the trinity" and then say, oh well that means that Jesus is a part of the trinity. That's now two steps outside of what's actually scriptural to try and make scripture make sense in a trinitarian doctrine. I guess that's certainly one of my main problems with the Trinity that ended up setting me on a journey to study this in depth and eventually become a Biblical Unitarian. The more you try to explain and describe the trinity, generally speaking, the further you get from actual scripture and actual scriptural language. We have to end up saying things like "eternally begotten", "God the son", "Jesus had two natures", etc. The more we try to rationalize the concept of the trinity, the further we get from any actual scriptural basis.
@MichaelTheophilus906 Жыл бұрын
@@socketman Sorry. My comment is sarcasm.
@IsJesusGod. Жыл бұрын
Good one! 😆
@petromax4849 Жыл бұрын
so Jesus is three people with two natures and two wills
@Somedude2020 Жыл бұрын
@@MichaelTheophilus906One human with two nature's ......the list goes on.
@Name005208 ай бұрын
The ultimate prove, that Jesus is god: Isaiah 44: 6 Thus saith the LORD the King of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD of hosts; 👉I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God. Revelation 1: 17 And when I saw him, I fell at his feet as dead. And he laid his right hand upon me, saying unto me, Fear not; 👉I am the first and the last: I am he that liveth,👉 and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death. Jesus is god!
@Name005206 ай бұрын
@FoundationalBibleTruths In Revelation 1: 17 Jesus is refering to Isaiah. John 1:49 Nathanael answered Him, “Rabbi, You are the Son of God; You are the King of Israel. Who is the King of Israel in Isaiah 44: 6?
@Name005206 ай бұрын
@FrankLee-gq8yc "i was dead" is the prove that Jesus is talking there. Why would he claim to be "the first and the last" which is obviously only God or the King of Israel (Isaiah 44: 6) wich is allso only God.
@Name005206 ай бұрын
@FrankLee-gq8yc Who is the King if Israel? God! Only God!! Rev. 1: 8 "I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty." 👉The Alpha and Omega is God Rev. 3: 11 "Behold, I come quickly: hold that fast which thou hast, that no man take thy crown." 👉Here Jesus speakes, he is the one who comes quickly Rev. 22: 12 "And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last." 👉And here Jesus says, he is the Alpha and the Omega.
@Name005206 ай бұрын
@FrankLee-gq8yc Are you saying that The Father came to the earth by sending his son? If God sends his son, than his son is that one who comes. For example: There is a concert somewhere and I send my son in my name to that concert. Some days later for some reason the police comes and asks me if i have a alibi for the day of the concert, can I than claim to have been at that concert?
@Name005206 ай бұрын
@FrankLee-gq8yc That who comes is Jesus and the same is called God Tell me if share allso the same title "Alpha and Omega for two different reasons. Two beginnings and two endings are not possible.
@mariomene2051 Жыл бұрын
I'm open to the idea, as I was uncertain about it for a long time... but it seems hard to dismiss some facts that point to Christ being God: 1. God relates to His people as "husband" in the Old Testament--and Christ is the Husband to God's People in the New Testament. 2. The Spirit of God within the prophets is called the Spirit of Christ (1 P 1:11).
@kevingeorge1095 Жыл бұрын
1. God is highly relational and uses various figures of speech to illustrate this. He is our heavenly Father, not our heavenly bureaucrat. 2. The word "spirit" is "pneuma" from which we get words like pneumatic. It has to do with breath or wind, the invisible driving force. Paul sends his spirit to attend a meeting in 1 Cor. 5:3-4.
@mariomene2051 Жыл бұрын
@@kevingeorge1095 1. The fact that God is highly relational doesn't answer for why Jesus is occupying the place of "husband" to God's people if Christ is not God. 2. Sure, but why was the Spirit of God called the Spirit of Christ (and this was during the Old Covenant, before Christ's incarnation)?
@ken440 Жыл бұрын
@@mariomene2051Jesus is husband to israel in the day of the lord. All through the four gospels Jesus is the jewish messiah speaking to jews about the coming kingdom.
@ken440 Жыл бұрын
Do you know what christ, a greek word christos means? it means "anointing" and so it OT we see Gods spirit is the spirit of anointing. People, kings etc are working under Gods anointing. in greek thats christos, and in english translation of septuagint we will read "christ." simple as abc, doesnt say that Jesus pre existed. So to say "christ being God" is saying "the anointed one being God" and as God does the anointing, in His spirit, then you are saying "the one God anointed is actually God." Thats like saying "The ambassador is actually the presedent" and logically destroys english comprehension. The anointed (christ) therefore is one anointed BY God, so therefore a representative FOR God. Jesus is NOT God, but is second only to God, now that God has raised him to that. Just like Pharaoh raised Joseph to sit beside him, and gave him all power and authority in all pharaohs dominion. Joseph was a "Plenipotentiary." absolutely representing pharaoh and entrusted fully to act in his own discretion. 95% of christianity has no idea of this.
@mariomene2051 Жыл бұрын
@@ken440I've heard it said that Christos means "anointed one". Especially in new testament context, it is understood as the Greek form of the word "Messiah". Even if it were granted, why is Christ the husband to God's people when God is the husband to God's people?
@2023Dorkydad7 сағат бұрын
Greetings all. John chapter one begins with the words, In the beginning was the word and the word was with God and the word WAS GOD . And the word became flesh...". God is revealed as a compound unity of three who are one.
@kerwinbrown4180 Жыл бұрын
Philo of Alexander speaks in the same manner as John and like John he talks of the Word. Philo, being a Jew like John, is a strict monotheist and he doesn't mean the word is the deity God. Both John and Philo are speaking to the same audience in a way that audience comprehends.
@hjc14029 ай бұрын
Philo was a binitarian and believed the Word is the second person of God, he did believe the Word is the creating deity.
@kerwinbrown41809 ай бұрын
@@hjc1402 I hadn't heard that claim. What I heard was a Jew. Thanks for the information.
@hjc14029 ай бұрын
@@kerwinbrown4180 oh okay, binitarians hold a belief about the person of God- they believe there are two divine persons of the one God YHWH, like how Unitarians believe there is one divine person and trinitarians believe there are three divine persons. You can look up about “the two powers in heaven”. This was a theological sect of Judaism. Many Jews up until the time of Jesus were binitarians. Some tried to identify who this second person of YHWH was like Philo who identified him as the Word (or logos) of God. And then of course Christians identify that Word to be Jesus. What makes this different than trinitarians is that we also identify the Holy Spirit as a divine person of the one God YHWH. I personally am not sure if binitarians considered the Holy Spirit to not be a separate person from the Father or if he was not considered divine as being why they were binitarians rather than trinitarians.
@christinefarrall9391 Жыл бұрын
Whoever is teaching you that Jesus is not God, is telling untruth. Please research this again with an ordinary bible, and ask the Holy Spirit to show you the truth. There are plenty of verses in the bible that Jesus is God. I had trouble grasping this myself. But I can assure you that Jesus is God. One cant pick verses out of the bible like that and analyze them. You need to read whole portions of a bible that is a good translation. One good translation of the bible is the NIV. That is one you can rely on to tell the truth. We can't work this out by our own mind. We need revelation actually. You only get revelation by reading whole chapers of the bible out aloud, so so you can hear the words you are speaking. That way your spirit is picking up the truth of the Word.
@manny4fe1 Жыл бұрын
I believed that Jesus was God for over 25 years, it is popular theology, fake news. No Apostle ever taught Catholic tradition, double nature, hypostatic unión, encarnation, God man etc etc. It was all devised by the Father of lies to discredit God's testimony about his Son Yeshua who came as a 100% man to redeem humanity. Keep listening, the Holy spirit will lead you and guide you into all truth Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world. By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God; and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God; this is the spirit of the antichrist, of which you have heard that it is coming, and now it is already in the world. 1 John 4:1-3 NASB1995
@ken440 Жыл бұрын
What about Col1:16 does that show Jesus is God? or Heb1:2. ?? I think you are wrong.
@malcolm7164 ай бұрын
@@ken440 Is not Jesus the Word of God?
@ken4404 ай бұрын
@@malcolm716 Jesus is the anointed one, messiah, that the word of God foretells all through the hebrew scripture. try Gen3:15 and Deut18:18, but its not just there. The lamb of God, a "son of man" and "a man proven (as messiah promised) with miracles and wonders by God, (done through him) and "first up from the dead" first of many brother" and "the mediator between God and men, the man Jesus christ." for the new testament. The word of God speaks a lot about Jesus, but its not totaly Jesus. So is Jesus the word of God? No, scripture is the word of God. Is the word of God Jesus? A fair proportion of it is either promising him as messiah/christ, or describing his activity, but not all of it.
@malcolm7164 ай бұрын
@@ken440 I understand what your saying, but was not also the Word made flesh and dwelt among us and we knew him now? Does that verse not imply that the word is a person
@upfromdown457311 ай бұрын
I think he does give a pretty good job of explaining it.
@briant79517 ай бұрын
0:09 hebrews 1:8 but unto the Son He saith, “Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever; a scepter of righteousness is the scepter of Thy Kingdom. God the father recognized Jesus as God
@briant79517 ай бұрын
😮
@biblicalunitarian7 ай бұрын
If Hebrews 1:8 makes Jesus God, then it also makes Solomon God. It was originally spoken to an Israelite King in Psalm 45:6 who had a wife (Psa. 45:9). So it was not originally about Jesus, but later found a second fulfillment in Jesus.
@timothytmusgrove7 ай бұрын
@@biblicalunitarian The consensus of scholars is this Psalm does not apply to King Solomon because he was not a warrior King. The language is Messianic because a forever Kingdom will be established through the Messiah. Well, THROUGH Christ Jesus (the WORD OF GOD) all things came into being. John 1: 3 All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being. So the entirety of scripture will always point to HIM. 2 Timothy 3:10 Now you followed my teaching, conduct, purpose, faith, patience, love, perseverance, 11 persecutions, and sufferings, such as happened to me at Antioch, at Iconium and at Lystra; what persecutions I endured, and out of them all the Lord rescued me! 12 Indeed, all who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will be persecuted. 13 But evil men and impostors will proceed from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived. 14 You, however, continue in the things you have learned and become convinced of, knowing from whom you have learned them, 𝟏𝟓 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐝 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐠𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐬𝐝𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐬𝐚𝐥𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐟𝐚𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐂𝐡𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐉𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐬. 𝟏𝟔 𝐀𝐥𝐥 𝐒𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐩𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐲 𝐆𝐨𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐟, 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐧 𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐞𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬; 17 so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work. Jeremiah 23:6 “In His days Judah will be saved, And Israel will dwell securely; And this is His name by which He will be called, ‘The Lord our righteousness.’ Matthew 633 But seek first His kingdom and His righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.
@kathyern8617 күн бұрын
Without faith, you are absolutely right, "It doesn't make sense"
@MarcWilliams-v9w2 ай бұрын
People forget that John's Prologue is him talking about Jesus, and not what Jesus ever said about Himself. I think the Prologue may have been written last as a summation statement which John had pondered ever since he found the shroud in the tomb. Who was Jesus?
@mctime1549 ай бұрын
At first, I did not understand John Chapter 1, but when the Lord saved me and gave me the Holy Ghost, He opened up my understanding. Even in Genesis, let us make man our image after our likeness..
@djfasidjecks48157 ай бұрын
You can't compare God to earthly metaphor because he created everything
@harveygitarista16004 ай бұрын
@@djfasidjecks4815 The Father is God. Jesus, the Son is God. The Holy Spirit is God. God is one. I say, amen, Lord. Man has no right to contradict the way God make Himself known in the Bible. God is Spirit. God is Eternal. God's Way is not human's way. God is the Creator. God is Holy. Man is a finite, created being who is sinful in his ways in this material created world. There's no way man could cage the Holy God with words and ideas like Unitary or Trinity; just so he could make sense in his head the divine Godhead with his natural experience. God is simply God the way He says so in His Word. Humans can't limit His ways! Humans can't contradict God!
@eliasziad78643 ай бұрын
Nothing is comparable to God however, Christians with their intelligence will jump around this to defend a mysterious doctrine that not even its fervent defenders can explain. Look at how the truth is clear, yet look at how they are so deluded.
@eliasziad78643 ай бұрын
@@harveygitarista1600 Jesus is the son of my ass. An accursed person he was. Unable to express himself nor explain his nature. The biggest fraud in human history. But I promise I will make sure to fix the world of the destruction that the accursed Jesus, son of Satan, has caused, I promise.
@alexshapiro984125 күн бұрын
Great video! Where are the likes though?
@arcordanza58683 ай бұрын
And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we saw his glory, the glory as it were of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. [John 1:14]
@petromax4849 Жыл бұрын
I think it matters whether "god" is being used as a name, title, position of authority, ontological category, or something else.
@QuëstionšnÅňşwęŕż7 ай бұрын
In those days it was always a title. The Romans, Greeks, Egyptians and so on had many many gods. God was always a title when this was written.
@ibrahim_7_233 ай бұрын
"And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord."Mark 12:29 Brother, you are preaching the true teachings of Jesus Christ (PBUH) to the world( Unlike the teachings of some 4th century theologians). Keep doing the GREAT WORK!
@GaretAlan503 ай бұрын
Trinitarians believe God is one being made up of three persons. So that verse disproves nothing
@Antonius11023 ай бұрын
He’s trying to convert people to Islam
@voymasa7980 Жыл бұрын
Something I heard a few years ago regarding Logos was that philosophically referred to the Divine Reason, i.e. the whole purpose and reason for cosmos. I confirmed that philosophers like Aristotle used it that way. I haven't been able to find any/many uses of that word by Jewish Philosophers of the second temple period (though they would've been using Hebrew/Aramaic instead obviously,) to strengthen the link to that being the intended meaning and usage of Logos in John 1. It Logos is intended as being used for the Divine Reason for the Cosmos, then it would comport with the end of Ecclesiastes that the whole purpose of man is to serve God and keep His commandments; otherwise, if the "traditional" interpretation is meant, I am not sure of a referent in the Tanakh for that kind of philosophical statement.
@ken440 Жыл бұрын
Yep, its pure plato via gnostic philosophy.
@voymasa7980 Жыл бұрын
@@ken440 you can't discard the way language works though. Incorporating a well established word into a philosophical statement means either you intend to bring that meaning and weight, or you are trying to use it in an unfamiliar way. The fourth gospel wasn't written in Hebrew or Aramaic originally, as far was we have evidence for, and was written at the end of the first century or beginning of the second. Other places the word logos is used with a fairly simple conversion between that and memra, but John 1 appears to be making a philosophical statement and the preexisting meaning of Logos in philosophy cannot be discarded
@ken440 Жыл бұрын
@@voymasa7980 as for philosophical statements, i see John simply talking about Gods word being the very heart of God, like the famous Horton said "I say what I mean and I mean what I say 100%." At creation God spoke and it was so, later the spoken word becomes the prophetic and written word, scripture. And that then goes on to bring us to mind that God spoke in the beginning of what we call the "word of God" in Gen3:15 and later to Israel in Deut18:18, all about human deliverers who will be the one to destroy the devil, and later God says in His word that Jesus came into the age to destroy the works of the devil, etc, and in the course of time those promises are fleshed out in the man Jesus, who as a second, obedient Adam, pays the blood debt owed by the first adam, and is then the lamb of Passover provided as a blood covering to those with faith to come under it. Simple biblical logic revealed in Gods word.
@voymasa7980 Жыл бұрын
@@ken440 i don't disagree with this summary, and would even add that scripture tells us God spoke in various manners to people, arguably including when He placed the stars for signs, seasons, etc (Daniel, the Magians, and "his star" to name a few related to his.) That being said, John 1:1 still reads as a philosophical statement in line with Ecclesiastes, though it could also be layered intention as well. *Shrug*
@abcmaya8 ай бұрын
The verse the Word was God clearly says that Jesus is God or at least was God or use to be God. Because in verse 14 it says the Word became flesh. So Jesus while he was here on Earth he left his divine being as God to become human. He is God in the flesh. Meaning God became human.
@jamiesimms70847 ай бұрын
John 1:1 You're right, it doesn't make sense to understand that in a Trinitarian way. Here is the scripture - In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. ___________________________________ *Trinitarian language key:* *Trinity(3 people in one Godly essence):* God *Jesus:* The Word ___________________________________ It doesn't mention father, son or Holy spirit. So if you take the Trinitarian word meaning as it is. It would read, In the beginning was Jesus, and Jesus was with The Trinity, and Jesus was The Trinity. If Jesus is the trinity then he is also the Father and the Holy Spirit and the Son. It implies he is all three but at the same time is with all three. This doesn't make sense. Jesus being all three persons is not what Trinitarians believe so this verse makes no sense to that doctrine.
@harveygitarista16004 ай бұрын
@@jamiesimms7084 The Father is God. Jesus, the Son is God. The Holy Spirit is God. God is one. I say, amen, Lord. Man has no right to contradict the way God make Himself known in the Bible. God is Spirit. God is Eternal. God's Way is not human's way. God is the Creator. God is Holy. Man is a finite, created being who is sinful in his ways in this material created world. There's no way man could cage the Holy God with words and ideas like Unitary or Trinity; just so he could make sense in his head the divine Godhead with his natural experience. God is simply God the way He says so in His Word. Humans can't limit His ways! Humans can't contradict God!
@jamiesimms70844 ай бұрын
@@harveygitarista1600 that's untrue and the Bible doesn't say that, but people change the meaning of things and interpret things how they want. If God is one then he is one person and if God is more than one person then God isn't one and this is a contradiction and this would mean God is an author of confusion and lies. Your understanding sounds like the philosophy of the devil. God is one and Jesus is his son.
@jamiesimms70844 ай бұрын
@@harveygitarista1600 you limit the unlimited God with your pagan thoughts. God isn't a trinity in any format whether you use the word or not. Your teaching like evolution is like the emperor's new clothes, just nonsense that people repeat and tell themselves it's real when it's really not.
@eliasziad78643 ай бұрын
Trinitarians should learn the law of non-contradiction. Their limited god can only be 3 persons? Shouldn’t he be infinite persons if he is an infinite god?
@berikkloningan Жыл бұрын
John 1:1-18 should be looked in a 3 segments, i.e John 1:1-5 (explaining what is the logos, that is the reveletions revealed by God to Prophets), John 1:5-13 (the coming of john the baptist), and john 1:14-18 (who the jesus was) . And essential to look up the Greek text. The greek word Houtos in john 1:2 should be translated as "It or this", because the context is to explain what is the logos (the revelations to the prophets). For the same reason, he word autou in John 1:3 also should be read as " It or this". And so on. So we have : 1. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 It (or the logos) was with God in the beginning. 3. Through it (the logos) all things were come about; without it (the logos) nothing was made that has been made. 4. In it (the logos) was life, and that life was the light of all mankind
@UniversalistSon95 ай бұрын
The kingdom of God is amongst us and within us
@francisconunez62316 ай бұрын
What do you guys think about the rest of the chapter? For example John saying we met God because of the son.
@biblicalunitarian6 ай бұрын
You might be thinking of John 14:9 "Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father" but if you look at his reasoning in the very next verse, it's not because he is the Father, but because the Father is "in" him. In other words, the Father can be seen in Jesus, Jesus exemplifies the Father, not that Jesus is the Father. Jesus revealed God to the world, not himself to the world (John 17:26).
@1541965 Жыл бұрын
In the beginning was used several times in the Bible in the NT and it doesn’t mean eternity but is to be understood as the beginning of subject matter. The same word in Greek ar-khay G746 Strong’s Hebrew and Greek Dictionaries Joh 15:27 And ye also shall bear witness, because ye have been with me from the beginning. Joh 16:4 But these things have I told you, that when the time shall come, ye may remember that I told you of them. And these things I said not unto you at the beginning, because I was with you. In the beginning doesn’t mean eternity because eternity in Greek means : Khronos-chronos G5550 eternal forever everlasting Rom 16:26 But now is made manifest, and by the scriptures of the prophets, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, made known to all nations for the obedience of faith: Ahee-o-nee-os G116 times eternal Tit 1:2 in hope of eternal life, which God, who cannot lie, promised before times eternal; in the beginning was the word why the Word start with capital W ? Is there Capital in Greek ?
@de-daa Жыл бұрын
Jesus answered, "I tell you the truth, before Abraham was even born, I Am!" John8:58
@1541965 Жыл бұрын
@@de-daa Joh 8:58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am. The beggar said I AM does that make him God ? Joh 9:9 Some said, This is he: others said, He is like him: but he said, I am he. John 8:58 - Then Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM.” INCOMPLETE SENTENCE I AM what ???? You assume I am means God because God said in Exo 3:13~14 I am who I am. When Jesus said before Abraham I am He was identifying himself and saying before Abraham I'm the one that the scriptures was talking about . I am He I am the man I Am the one I claim to be I AM the Messiah you are waiting for. I AM in Greek means Ego Eimi and used many times in the New Testament as I am the Messiah such as in John 9:9 beggar in the street said I AM Ego Emi like Jesus said I am. Does that mean the beggar is God because he said Ego Emi I am ? Joh 9:9 Christian disagree on this verse and have textual differences textual variant for this verse Some said Ego Emi means, This is he: others said, He is like him: but he said, ( I AM ) he. Other translation said Iam the man or Iam the one or it’s me so many different translation for the same word Ego Emi which doesn’t mean God ? translated as I AM He I am the Messiah but not I AM God ? Translation such as Amplified Bible (AMP) Some said, “It is he.” Still others said, “No, but he looks like him.” But he kept saying, “I am the man.” Amplified Bible, Classic Edition (AMPC) Some said, It is he. Others said, No, but he looks very much like him. But he said, Yes, I am the man. Christian Standard Bible (CSB) Some said, “He’s the one.” Others were saying, “No, but he looks like him.” He kept saying, “I’m the one.” Common English Bible (CEB) Some said, “It is,” and others said, “No, it’s someone who looks like him.” But the man said, “Yes, it’s me!” The disciples of Jesus said Ego Emi does that makes them God : In Matt 26:22 the last supper one of the disciples of Jesus said Ego Emi does that make him God Mark 13:6 said Many will come in my name saying I AM He does that make them God for saying I AM HE. Also in Matt 14:27 , Mark 6:50 & John 6:20 , John 8:24 & Act 26:29 Jesus said IAM HE which means IAM the Messiah not I AM God ? you can find the meaning of I AM HE in the same chapter I AM SON OF MAN . John 8:24 - “Therefore I said to you that you will die in your sins; for if you do not believe that (I AM [He],) you will die in your sins.” Joh 8:28 Then said Jesus unto them, When ye have lifted up (the Son of man, then shall ye know that I am he ), and that I do nothing of myself; but as my Father hath taught me, I speak these things. Why Jesus didn't say before Adam the first creation or before the Angels ? Who did virgin Marry give birth to if Jesus was before Abraham ? Jeremiah was probably there before Abraham too, this is what God tells Jeremiah: Jer 1:5 Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.
@mtdouthit12915 ай бұрын
My translation-“In beginning was the Word, and the Word was with the God, and God was the Word.”
@samsam-qp3fw5 ай бұрын
God spoke everything to existence. And God said... that's his word. The word is an extension of His being, just as my word is an extension of myself (and we can use that analogy as we are created in the image and likeness of God.) Just as what I say is not separate from who I am, the Word of God is with God and still is God.
@arlosmith278410 ай бұрын
As a Jew I agree with you that Hashem is One. There is NO OTHER 🕎
@h.sumantri18609 ай бұрын
Why Trinitarian Doctrine (TD) is so difficult to be understood? For it was born of Hellenistic philosophy (Alexandria), and developed in Roman paganism (Roman Kingdom); aka: of "Greco-Roman perspective" Sean Finnegan says.
@kardiognostesministries81508 ай бұрын
Because it is based on the Bible and not on human logic.
@akastevegrant15 күн бұрын
John 8:57 - 59 So the Jews said to him, “You are not yet fifty years old, and have you seen Abraham?” 58 Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.” 59 So they picked up stones to throw at him, but Jesus hid himself and went out of the temple. Are we still trying to throw stones at the I Am?
@Autumn-m9rАй бұрын
Thank you for making this . I’m losing my mom currently and really need to reconnect to faith . I’m in Oklahoma and I’ve always loved Jesus , but there is a lot of Christianity here and it just doesn’t completely resonate ❤
@biblicalunitarianАй бұрын
Happy to help. So sorry to hear about your mom. There are Unitarian Christians all over the US, check out this map here: www.unitarianchristianalliance.org/membership-map/
@oliocalabriadenis75995 ай бұрын
Please correct: the greek translation says: GOD WAS THE WORD and not: the word was God....why did you quote it wrongly?????
@DrGazza6 ай бұрын
If the trinity is correct, then it does make sense that the Word (second person) was both God and with God. I am learning Greek and not an expert, but in the phrase in verse 1b, both God (theos) and the Word (logos) are in the nominative case and so both are subjects. Apparently, in this Greek device the latter is read first (the Word) and the former (God) is read last. The definite article is implied in this grammar rule.
@larrythrasher97137 ай бұрын
0:58 @QuestionsnAnswersify the instance of "ho theos," "The God" in John 1:1b, but no article in John 1:1c
@looktothehillz95924 ай бұрын
Mark 14:61-64 ESV But he remained silent and made no answer. Again the high priest asked him, "Are you the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?" [62] And Jesus said, "I am, and you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven." [63] And the high priest tore his garments and said, "What further witnesses do we need? [64] You have heard his blasphemy. What is your decision?" And they all condemned him as deserving death.
@Diana-xm1dmАй бұрын
John 1:14 Goes with John 1:1 John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. John 1:14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
@davidmathiesen76864 ай бұрын
Satan hates the thought that Jesus is worshiped and putting faith in Him will give u eternal life. THATS WHY THIS WILL ALWAYS BE DEBATED TILL JESUS RETURNS AND THOSE DENYING HIM WILL BE VERY SAD.