It's a rare person who can explain a specialist field to a lay crowd so effectively and with such passion. If I'd had a science teacher like you at any point in school, it would for sure have influenced my level of interest and potential future career path. Thank you for doing what you do and helping the rest of us understand chemistry a bit better.
@CL-we8tn2 жыл бұрын
I'll second that. Finally understand molecules.
@wifiradio11452 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/pojJo2Sra6-terM. . . . . .
@jjcoola9982 жыл бұрын
I was so lucky to have a history teacher like this! Totally changes things
@deeangelt2 жыл бұрын
she was my chemistry professor this past year, she’s rlly amazing :)
@davidluna72 жыл бұрын
you think people would stop giving excuses for everything they are too lazy to do
@kelseyk682 жыл бұрын
Poor PJ just trying to have fun on Twitter and getting absolutely dragged lmao
@v1ntagecassette2 жыл бұрын
Give pj his checkmark back, he worked so very hard for it
@birdtutorialart2 жыл бұрын
Can’t believe PJs tweet was in here 😭😭
@ItachiUchiha-gf4fz2 жыл бұрын
11:02 you know that she's a *Mad* Scientist judging by how she mixes that slime🤣
@ITILII2 жыл бұрын
Two of my very favorites: Kate the Chemist and astrobiologist Dr. David Grinspoon...both truly brilliant and enthusiastic, they just demonstrate it in different ways. Especially appreciate it when Dr. Grinspoon says how much he loves Wall-E.....the reaction of some of most brilliant people on the planet for a cartoon is truly endearing :-)
@OracleAnne Жыл бұрын
Another way older lava lamps worked was with fluid and semi solid wax! When the wax was solid, it was denser than the fluid and would sink, but when the whole thing was heated by a lightbulb, the liquid wax could float and be moved around by the hot liquid. Different kinds of lava lamps!
@hantrio43275 ай бұрын
I think every lava lamp works like that
@MOLPESIMS2 жыл бұрын
I wish I had you as a teacher, you can explain chemistry like a genius! I will use your examples when I help kids with chemistry for sure! ♥
@Le_Fenix2 жыл бұрын
Just used Ryan and Blake as an analogy for chemistry, I’m impressed
@aapdddАй бұрын
Her enthusiasm is infectious !
@jaibhagat74412 жыл бұрын
Never seen such energetic teacher before
@laijamanuel2 жыл бұрын
I love the people in these videos, they are so passionate about their area of knowledgeable, and answer everything on a simple way.
@CellRus2 жыл бұрын
Do a biochemist or cell biologist please! I think people would love to hear more about these lesser known area of science (relative to the general audience of course).
@hathawyn3 ай бұрын
She loves chemistry so much. I don't, but I do love her.
@wario75142 жыл бұрын
Wow who is this pj dude? He should make a KZbin channel...
@yasminh3 ай бұрын
I love how her passion shines through it makes me so excited about chemistry :D
@shubhsrivastava44172 жыл бұрын
Her explanations and analogies were very good.
@HWme2 жыл бұрын
5:34 I always knew Gandalf was well lectured in Chemistry!!! 🎆
@MakeyJu2 жыл бұрын
lmaooo they got PJ's joke tweet on there
@CadetSparkleWolf2 жыл бұрын
I really thought it might’ve been a joke holy cow they really edited out the verified check and used PJ’s tweet I’m SHOOK! 😭
@ShrimpKing33332 жыл бұрын
#JusticeforPJ
@frankjohnson1232 ай бұрын
I'm pretty sure the reason atoms are hard to pass through is because of electrostatic repulsion or nuclear forces, not because the nucleus is very dense. F = ma, so as long as you can transfer a force to a low-mass object you can move it easily, regardless of density.
@onyxbackstrom33792 жыл бұрын
This channel is so freaking cool that experts can educate people and boy they do a dang good job! Although the slime I'm used to wasn't as, foamy/marshmallow looking. Not as viscous as I'm used to.
@scottieapplseed2 жыл бұрын
She is more bubbly than devil's toothpaste! Love that passion.
@alxferraro4 ай бұрын
I love seeing super excited people talking about topics they love!!! 😍
@jatin3682 жыл бұрын
I love her enthusiasm and energy, she really loves her profession
@SyntaxScout Жыл бұрын
She is incredibly adorable,i learned more chemistry with her than my entire school days.
@0mnom2 жыл бұрын
I’m confused, I thought boiling happened at different temperatures according to altitude, for example, on the top of Mount Everest, wouldn’t water boil at a lower temperature due to the thinner atmosphere?
@spookyspacekook43272 жыл бұрын
Where were the safety goggles for the slime lab??
@sentheinfo93774 ай бұрын
she's such a sweetheart omg.
@sussycat66674 ай бұрын
I am not trying to start an argument whatsoever, but I was a bit curious about the most dangerous chemical reaction and I found that there was one particular explosive called Triacetone Triperoxide (TATP) that was more explosive while still being extremely sensitive (I couldn't find out if it was more sensitive or not).
@TheSleepSteward3 ай бұрын
Why is this only JUST getting into my recommended??
@EduardoWalcacer2 жыл бұрын
As a chemist, this was a very difficult video to watch. All answers were based on high school chemistry knowledge. Do Americans skip their chemistry classes? Also, the lava lamp answer was wrong. They are composed of wax (solid at room temp and liquid when heated), kerosene, polyethylene glycol and water. The movement is only possible because of a heat source. Regarding everything being made of chemicals (matter), possibly only 15% of the universe is chemistry. The rest is dark matter and we still lack the knowledge to explain it.
@Koshrocreations2 жыл бұрын
She also replied wrongly to a question. The person said "if atoms are mostly empty, why can't we pass our hands through materials". She replied about the nuclei being dense so we can never touch the nuclei. She didn't answer at all.
@fremen84662 жыл бұрын
@@Koshrocreations Not to mention she wrongly stated that humans don't have pheromones. LOL.
@espanadorada79622 жыл бұрын
Yeah I was kinda excited but none of the questions were remotely interesting :(
@LeBeautiful2 жыл бұрын
I need a chemist to explain the most effective type of SPF for daily usage. Hmmm.
@nnamrehck4 ай бұрын
The size of the nucleus is femtometers (10e-15 meters). The size of the atom is on the order of nanometers (10e-9 meters). The reason your hand will not pass through another object is due to the electrostatic force.
@nathanielmiller21015 ай бұрын
Just want to point out that she glosses over why fireworks are different colors. The person asking the question probably wasn't referring to the fact that fireworks are explosive, might have been more interested as to what made the colors in the firework.
@set-tes43162 жыл бұрын
My ex told me we were like hypobromic acid (if I remember correctly) and that we matched for sure but eventually we disolved in search of stability, idk if his analogy was scientifically accurate but I found it fitting
@Danapher2 жыл бұрын
1:56 spooked me
@ethanmckinney2033 ай бұрын
Slightly wrong on the Diet Coke. Diet sodas have a lower surface tension than regular sodas due to the characteristics of the artificial sweeteners. You can find videos of some very careful experiments with a variety of sodas. The diet colas shoot much higher than anything else.
@LeatherCladVegan2 жыл бұрын
Dear Kate: How does one represent a line drawing of methane? Is it just a dot? I am confused and I can't find the answer anywhere. Thank you :)
@Dani-it5sy2 ай бұрын
The most dangerous chemical reaction must be one that finds place inside someones brain.
@matthijscalje41432 жыл бұрын
If only my chemistry teacher was like this...
@lifesrevolter10 ай бұрын
As someone who has taught chemistry, I’m very impressed by her explanations and even more enamoured by her passion for chemistry
@sisakhoza47392 жыл бұрын
She needs to rewrite all the textbooks, her analogies make sense
@10names552 жыл бұрын
Its because she is making expressions too,when her words will be printed as cold letters,i bet for those don't understand chem will find it boring
@IsaoTakeuchi2 жыл бұрын
and change our science teacher too
@sisakhoza47392 жыл бұрын
@@IsaoTakeuchi you want her to rewrite your teacher? 💀
@IsaoTakeuchi2 жыл бұрын
@@sisakhoza4739 omg, no. I was typo
@sisakhoza47392 жыл бұрын
@@IsaoTakeuchi gave me a good laugh though 😂
@amaradejo2 жыл бұрын
OK, so this was THE test for me: I absolutely despised chemistry in high school and I'm not a fan now. But she really made the topics interesting with her fun analogies, her excited energy and her charm. Tech Support is a gem. I swear, every guest is wonderful.
@keirmccoy86232 жыл бұрын
Absolutely agree. I hated chemistry as well but I could listen to her forever, her enthusiasm is totally infectious!
@duckymomo79352 жыл бұрын
to do real chemistry, you do need to do computations and theoretical stuff... there's not other way around the boring parts
@everythingsalright11212 жыл бұрын
@@duckymomo7935 yeah, but it'd be nice if the teachers weren't complete jerks. all of my chem teachers were utterly dispassionate when it came to teaching the subject in a way that high schoolers would understand. my grade 12 chem teacher was so condescending a bunch of people just dropped her class after like 2 weeks
@squeezter Жыл бұрын
School chemistry doesnt do a good representation of the science at all
@WilhelmFreidrich3 ай бұрын
@@duckymomo7935wrong
@DaniGG02 жыл бұрын
She literally was my professor at UT Austin!! She’s the best!!!! It’s so cool to see her do this!!
@orgchem33592 жыл бұрын
We just started presenting one paper each week in organic chemistry literature; here is the link... kzbin.info/www/bejne/iYGzo2ibo7yjlZo
@halicusnguyen88642 жыл бұрын
That's so cool!!
@ETaicx Жыл бұрын
Dammit I was supposed to go to UT. I should've went , she would've been worth it hahaha
@infinitesimotel5 ай бұрын
BUT was she REALLY your professor?
@MrrrrAdryan5 ай бұрын
@@infinitesimotel Obviously, lol
@Magic_beans_2 жыл бұрын
Yes PJ was joking, but you’d be surprised how many people don’t know what chemicals are and assume they’re always dangerous.
@onkelpappkov26662 жыл бұрын
R-r-radiation?!
@miaomiaochan2 жыл бұрын
I chuckle whenever I see "chemical-free" or "ingredients you can pronounce" in a product description. How many minds would be blown if they'd known that their beloved essential oils contained scary-sounding chemicals like alpha-terpineol, beta-caryophyllene and phenylpropanoids?
@StorymasterQ2 жыл бұрын
@@miaomiaochan Or even Dihydrogen Monoxide.
@princexyz16632 жыл бұрын
People think chemical is poison or toxic substances or bad material
@helenchelmicka789411 ай бұрын
@@StorymasterQlol or even Sodium Chloride
@tubthungusbychumbungus2 жыл бұрын
this is absolutely the first time kickthepj has ever been featured in a youtube video. congrats to kickthepj for making it onto youtube!!
@ghost_nunya2 жыл бұрын
his tweet was so funny, i hope he starts a youtube channel! i'm sure he would make a lot of creative content and would do very well
@livingdeaddoll.2 жыл бұрын
what a funny guy!! would probably be a great person for creating silly goofy content on youtube :D
Dr. Biberdorf is a fantastic explainer. I would love to hear her give a talk/lecture.
@mantisbog2 жыл бұрын
I’m sure you would.
@amakaokafor76242 жыл бұрын
She’s a chemistry professor at my school University of Texas at Austin !!
@リンゴ酢-b8g Жыл бұрын
she can give me something else
@ryanlowther9899 Жыл бұрын
I had a semester with her! it was incredible she's the nicest person and definitely the most passionate professor I've had at UT
@yellstr2 жыл бұрын
OMG, her answer to "why can't I pass my hand through a solid object?" is absolutely wrong! Nucleus has absolutely nothing to do with it! It is all electro-static force: the electrons in the atoms zip so fast that they form a "cloud" around the nuclei. And since these clouds are made of electrons they have negative electric charge, and similar charges repel. Thus, the electron clouds around the atoms of your hand and a table start repelling each other when you get them close enough. Also your hand can't "exchange electrons" with the table - when atoms "exchange" electrons that is how molecules are formed. And you do not form new molecules each time you touch the table.
@jitenyasu2 жыл бұрын
This is an important correction and needs to be pinned
@nilswilling2 жыл бұрын
Omg I thought the same thing. Altough in reality electrons don't move around the nucleus, but have a superposition which we call orbitals, but still you're absolutely right it's not the nucleus its all just electric fields.
@tonyatthebeach2 жыл бұрын
Ditto. I'm not even a scientist and even I knew it's the electromagnetic forces that keep atoms apart. Essentially the universe is more energy than mass, even though they're interchangeable-ish
@ElDuende4022 жыл бұрын
you guys sound a lot smarter than me so correct me if I'm wrong but... mathematically speaking it is possible to go through solid objects... just that the odds are so small it will most likely never happen... or maybe i misunderstood kyle hill 😅😓
@nilswilling2 жыл бұрын
@@ElDuende402 You're right-ish. In solid objects the electron orbitals are packed so dense together there is (depending on the thickness) no free straight path through. That means there is no way to pass trough the object. However if you're a charged ion without electrons at all (eg alpha particle) and the solid material is sufficiently thin, than it's absolutely possible to pass right through (Rutherfords gold foil experiment showed that).
@lucimorningstar8122 жыл бұрын
OMG poor PJ. First removing his checkmark and then actually answering his joke tweet?
@TheKoopaBros2 жыл бұрын
I just graduated with my Bachelors in Chemistry, and she's much better at explaining general chemistry theories in an understandable way than most of my professors. 😅
@sussyscylla34143 ай бұрын
Don't you learn this stuff in year 11-12 at school?
@danielsvoboda62333 ай бұрын
The problem is, she doesn't... Some of the responses are inaccurate or even flat out misleading
@oktovria2 жыл бұрын
The Ryan Blake analogy tho 🤣
@semblanteelmerg.59562 жыл бұрын
What a creative way to explain double replacement reaction. LOL
@jp97072 жыл бұрын
I feel so sorry for their original dates 😔 Now I'm convinced that will happen to me, thanks for the anxiety KZbin 😂
@yevgeniyaleshchenko849 Жыл бұрын
@@jp9707 Well those original dates are actually lucky to not end up with partners who are not right for them. Maybe they went on to meet someone more suitable for them
@PoppyVelluto2 жыл бұрын
i’m here for kick the pj
@TheScareLab2 жыл бұрын
The fact she answered him is killing me
@tinystarfields2 жыл бұрын
aren't we all
@thelogIady2 жыл бұрын
she edited out his verified mark 😭
@GrubbyPigeon2 жыл бұрын
I HAVENT SEEN THAT NAME SINCE I WAS 15
@slowazzd21652 жыл бұрын
Is he actually that stupid or is it a satire account
@cameronmcclean66422 жыл бұрын
Glad I’m not the only one who was stupidly excited to see PJ pop up
@corvuspika2 жыл бұрын
i can’t believe you dragged pj through the dirt like that 😭 POOR BOY WAS HAVING A JONK
@Skyhighjettalone2 жыл бұрын
I don't want to rain on the parade for everyone who's enjoying the video, but that analogy for why objects don't pass through other solid objects didn't seem correct to me. I may be misunderstanding her explanation but I'm pretty sure the nucleus isn't coming in contact with other nuclei. They are not only incredibly small compared to the electron cloud surrounding it. But a positively charged nucleus would repel another positively charged nucleus, no contact possible there without an insane amount of energy. I could be wrong, and there could be a better way to explain it, I'm open to being corrected.
@jwildan2 жыл бұрын
In terms of touching something, you would be able to get as close as you can to anything else. I think it would have been better if she explained how states of matter and energy relate. Like how it's easier to push your hand through air compared to water because of the speed a molecule is moving at. You could put your hand through a solid object if you gave it enough energy to move its dense mass but then it would probably no longer be a solid (and would also be a ton of energy). Her explanation makes sense but it feels very incomplete and may have just been cut down by the editing team.
@TheJoyBinkley2 жыл бұрын
the visualization of electrons as accessories is so helpful though.
@TheScarvig2 жыл бұрын
the thing is that half of the questions weren't chemistry related at all... so she just kept talking with what amounts to pretty much the same amount of knowledge any person with a degree in any stem field could.
@joshuamitchell55302 жыл бұрын
No you’re right her explanation is just wrong. If you’re at the point where 2 atomic nuclei are coming close to each other, this implies the electron densities of the atoms have overlapped, ie formed a chemical bond. Not what happens when you touch something. When you touch something ur feeling the Inter-electron repulsions. Nothing to do with the nuclei.
@auth70462 жыл бұрын
@@jwildan thats not why you cant put your hand through solid objects, you dont need more energy to move the atoms, you need more energy to deform the structure.
@kasparalindberg64072 жыл бұрын
I can't believe she's answering PJ's unhinged tweet 😂
@iamtheusualguy26112 жыл бұрын
The word "chemicals" these days get a bad name in many fields but chemistry and chemicals as a whole is actually super interesting and useful.
@joanna09882 жыл бұрын
Yup it's been overused like many buzz words and loses its actual meaning.
@onkelpappkov26662 жыл бұрын
- Wait, you want me to drink this poison that will kill me? - Don't worry, it's natural and organic. - Oh okay, I'm relieved.
@yevgeniyaleshchenko849 Жыл бұрын
@@onkelpappkov2666 Lol
@Vacillate-v9e8 ай бұрын
It's the Carbon Florine bonded chemicals in kitchen utensils, clothes and other places that are creating pollution for millenniums of years. They are already in the water. Plus air and soil too.
@user-fk8zw5js2p5 ай бұрын
The term chemicals adds a subjectively negative meaning to substances so that people don't have to study chemistry to understand: that stuff is dangerous, unpredictable, and thus bad for me. Problem is in the age of misinformation, chemicals can be used instead to get people to agree with their opinion. Kind of the same as laws are good and we want those, but regulations are bad and we don't want those.
@abdelm4lek2 жыл бұрын
Her excitement and energy is contagious. Glad she's been brought back!
@uncletrash87702 жыл бұрын
I thought lava lamps were filled with wax and some liquid, and the wax gets warmed up by the bulb at the bottom, it rises, cools down and falls, so it can melt and start the process again. No gas is involved.
@humanicd2 жыл бұрын
That's how I understand it. Kerosene and paraffin was my understanding.
@nosamnosam123 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, I don't know what she was talking about, and I'd hate to say she doesn't either. It sounded like she was making assumptions without actually knowing.
@AstroSandee5 ай бұрын
It's usually wax and water
@CopperTOPDave5 ай бұрын
And here's a 3rd misinformed statement she's made - @wired pull this vid please. its inaccurate to say the least.
@londonalicante3 ай бұрын
You are correct. Wax expands more with temperature than water does. She is wrong.
@EIrondx2 жыл бұрын
An absolute energizer bunny professor. The ideal chem professor for ALL ages 👏🏻
@Tesserex2 жыл бұрын
3:45 umm that explanation is just wrong? The nuclei are so small there's almost no chance of them colliding with each other. The reason you can't pass objects through each other is because their electron clouds are all negatively charged and thus repel each other. What she described with the nuclei smacking together would imply you've achieved a fusion reaction every time you touch something.
@danielmirandacastro71612 жыл бұрын
Indeed
@jwildan2 жыл бұрын
I think she was trying to explain why the amount of energy you could put on a solid object isn't enough to push through it like you can with liquids or gas. I'm gonna assume it's some editing cut of the explanation as it's sorely incomplete. It could be enough to get the concept through to the average viewer if explained more even if you can't actually touch a nuclei in most settings.
@Tesserex2 жыл бұрын
@@jwildan I can't really find a way to be charitable enough to salvage her answer. She only mentioned mass density of the nuclei which has literally nothing to do with it. She didn't even use the word "charge" or anything associated with the EM force in her explanation. I guess maybe it could have been lost in the edit, but it would have to be a pretty consciously malicious editor to mangle it that badly.
@Twiggyshayz2 жыл бұрын
Exactly! was looking for this comment, thx
@edbangor91632 жыл бұрын
I know that the Pauli exclusion principle is physics and not chemistry, but fundamentally, it is the reason why solids are solid. If you want to dumb it down for a mass audience, she could have said the electrons repel each other, as it at least would kinda be close. The thing about nuclei being dense was so inaccurate. I learned a basic version of the exclusion principle in high school physics. For a chemist to be that wrong is rather sad.
@AuroraFirestorm2 жыл бұрын
Wait a second. The reason that you can't pass your hand through a solid object, is because the electrons in the atoms in your hand repel the electrons in the atoms in the object. Nuclei take up basically no space, they're not big, except in the really enormous lab-made elements, so what is this thing about smacking into nuclei?
@stormixgaming83892 жыл бұрын
Yeah completely blindsided by this as well, as soon as the question was asked I was expecting the electrostatic force as the response, needless to say I was very surprised at the explanation and I'm currently somewhat skeptical of it. Naturally most things in these explainers have to necessarily be over simplified, but I can't find a way to make the two compatible.
@BZakaBZ2 жыл бұрын
Yeah that answers was straight up wrong 😅
@AnnieAcrux2 жыл бұрын
Exactly!!! I was pretty shocked hearing the answer she gave. Electromagnetism helloo? Not only brushing off the electron cloud, saying you can "bump into a nucleus"? Like what, you talking about nuclear fusion? Ahah Aaand you think the nucleus is big? it is 1/100.000 of the size of the atom ffs xD i know chemists are not quantum physicists but.....breh
@cj08152 жыл бұрын
It's a bit more complicated as the atom is still neutral. AFAIK the full answer lies in quantum mechanics as electrons can not be in the same place and same quantum state. So if you push the electron clouds of two atoms together, some of the electrons would need to jump to higher energy states.
@bryaneberly35882 жыл бұрын
better thought of as "smacking into the strong-nuclear force, which binds the neutrons and protons together." which happens to be so strong, and containing so much energy, that when we are actually able to break through the strong-nuclear force, we can wipe out cities with it and power millions of homes.
@taraascanlon2 жыл бұрын
rip PJ’s verification tick, also did you just happen across his tweet and decide to use it in the video??
@tinystarfields2 жыл бұрын
oh hi PJ
@thelogIady2 жыл бұрын
Pj is bringing so many people here you guys better give him his royalties
@taidko3762 жыл бұрын
The fact that she actually answered Pjs' tweet plz
@isobelf18372 жыл бұрын
Jonked too close to the sun, pj
@invox94902 жыл бұрын
She's all perky and fun, and explains everything quite well. I like her.
@ronozoh2 жыл бұрын
The reason why we can't pass through each other is not the "incredibly dense nucleus of atoms" it's the strength of the repulsion of the electromagnetic field of electrons, primarily.
@9000leo2 жыл бұрын
Thats right...
@erikl14782 жыл бұрын
@@9000leo yeah as a chemist myself i have to say that there were some "inaccuracies" and also a defintly false statements like this in this video. I get that its hard to simplify many concepts so that a non-science person understands, but still...
@9000leo2 жыл бұрын
@@erikl1478 Watched the other chem support vid featuring Kate, got the same disappointment unfortunately. She's commenting the use of HF for dissolving flesh in Breaking Bad was not great because it's a weak acid... But I thought whether a substance is corrosive doesn't really have to do with its acidity...
@ghostlain2 жыл бұрын
pj no oh my god
@themaddiemads2 жыл бұрын
I honestly really didn't like chemistry in school, because I found it so hard to understand, but no one ever made the effort to explain it like this! The way you broke everything down, and added so much enthusiasm actually made all of these answers make sense!
@rosettachristopher69812 жыл бұрын
You can tell she loves chemistry. Love her vibe❤
@Marizjenne2 жыл бұрын
PJ sent me here
@thelogIady2 жыл бұрын
can't believe kickthepj is famous now
@minervamanuel58882 жыл бұрын
LMAO PJ what did you do
@bjd19802 жыл бұрын
The passing your hand through question Was entered incorrectly. It's because of the electromagnetic force. The nucleus does not take up a lot of space in an atom it's very dense yes, but it takes up a very small amount in space
@taraascanlon2 жыл бұрын
where’s all my fellow sweet potats!?
@semblanteelmerg.59562 жыл бұрын
What a creative way to explain double replacement reaction in a nutshell😂. I'm now a fan.
@hammyliu12 жыл бұрын
Her analogy isn't rigourous though. She doesn't explain chemical equilibrium in her analogy.
@stripyrex_gaming2 жыл бұрын
@@hammyliu1 i would find it weird for it to be rigorous when it's mean to be explained within a minute to a wide array of audience
@sunnyday_lemonbars2 жыл бұрын
@@hammyliu1 laypeople aren't going to understand that
@ynneper2 жыл бұрын
PJ in the thumbnail 👀
@TheScareLab2 жыл бұрын
And she answers him at 2:34!!!
@shivb29502 жыл бұрын
@@TheScareLab no this person is laughing bc kickthepj is a famous youtuber lmao
@TheScareLab2 жыл бұрын
@@shivb2950 I know, I was pointing out that she actually answered his off-the-rail tweet as well as putting him in the thumbnail.
@thelogIady2 жыл бұрын
but edited his verified checkmark out😶
@TheScareLab2 жыл бұрын
@@thelogIady I know, right? The cheek of it.
@embaggins2 жыл бұрын
PJ's question is at 2:30 for those who want to see it 😌
@c0smic.dw3llerАй бұрын
thanks lol
@jhunphillip1232 жыл бұрын
came here to check if kickthepj really is in this video, and he is
@wailingalen Жыл бұрын
This is the type of person that should be a professor or textbook author. People like this beautiful and intelligent woman makes us realize how unpassionate a lot of my schoolteachers were. A great teacher can make a huge difference in the future of our generations
@yevgeniyaleshchenko849 Жыл бұрын
She is both actually.
@chrislive15865 ай бұрын
"Beautiful and..."
@lucasl86894 ай бұрын
Despite her passionate approach to teaching, a number of her answers have rather significant scientifically errors (her explanation as to why objects don't pass through each other and the mechanics of a typical lava lamp are entirely wrong). Regrettably, camps in education tend to boil down to passion "or" expertise (I use quotes as the camps present a false dichotomy). Many teachers and professors lean to the other side of that dichotomy, emphasizing accuracy without passion. Neither, on its own, is very effective, and I suspect the very existence of that dichotomy creates a sort of feedback loop. Those that focus on accuracy find themselves having to un-teach a lot of errors that had been taught by a "fun teacher," while those that focus on enthusiasm find themselves having to re-teach students how to enjoy learning. The truly great teachers are the ones who find harmony between both methods.
@ClashOfClans2523 ай бұрын
Nah. She should only be a teacher. Leave textbooks to the brilliant minds.
@hhhaaaaf2 жыл бұрын
they should've kept PJ's tweet in the thumbnail but give him back the verification mark lol
@beepbeep87692 жыл бұрын
4:00 bill nye said that the reason you can’t pass through solid objects is because like charges repel each other so we interpret them as solid. strange how she (a chemist) has a completely different response than a physicist
@danfg72152 жыл бұрын
I was baffled by her explanation even though she's obviously dumbing it down for the laymen, AFAIK it's mostly the electrons which are repelling each other and maintaining bonds with other atoms, protons have barely anything to do with why solids can't pass through each other, but I'm no expert.
@stormixgaming83892 жыл бұрын
It's pretty much just wrong unless this was cut in the most ungodly manner possible. Hard to really save the explanation.
@danreynАй бұрын
I mean you knew there was going to be some wrong stuff when she said everything around us is chemistry. Everything is physics; chemistry is just how elements interact with other elements
@beepbeep87692 жыл бұрын
pj!!!
@Koshrocreations2 жыл бұрын
Finally something up my ally. Chemist here, enjoying this. Also you can break a bond between atoms just by giving them enough energy.
@TremendousSax2 жыл бұрын
Alley*
@yevgeniyaleshchenko849 Жыл бұрын
@@TremendousSax That was obviously just a typo, come on!
@TremendousSax Жыл бұрын
@@yevgeniyaleshchenko849 yes, it was obviously a typo
@Lurkily_Esh Жыл бұрын
These are not the same lava lamps of my childhood. These were just wax in some liquid that was right on the edge of wax's density, so that when it was molten, it rose, and when it began to cool, it sank. The light at the bottom heated and melted it.
@CopperTOPDave5 ай бұрын
it hasnt changed...she's actually just wrong.
@sethp262 жыл бұрын
3:52 electrostatic repulsion between the electrons in your hand and the table causes you to not be able to put your hand through it, not the nucleus
@edbangor91632 жыл бұрын
Pauli exclusion principle, technically, but anything with electrons would be more accurate than the description she gave.
@sethp262 жыл бұрын
@@edbangor9163 i mean kinda... pauli exclusion principle is why electrons dont all chill in the same spot/ form interior and valence shells, they can't be identical particles. it doesn't have much to do with why your hand can't pass through a table. You have to have quantum tunneling on a macroscopic scale to actually do that. The question is so absurd it doesn't really have a concrete answer at least without a butt ton of math
@espanadorada79622 жыл бұрын
@@edbangor9163 it’s not Pauli exclusion principle, it’s just electrostatic repulsion
@florianm96932 жыл бұрын
@@espanadorada7962 look up the repulsive term of interaction potentials like the lennard jones potential and you will see that it always has a much shorter range than r^-2. this shows that the repulsion is a quantum mechanic effect namely the pauli repulsion
@leiajiang78772 жыл бұрын
My guy whose asking why there's chemical in his brain blows my mind.
@Spacey_Mad2 жыл бұрын
Oh god PJ-
@astroch2 жыл бұрын
As a physicist, many of her answers trigger me. They are just wrong. Like the empty atoms one.
@NueThunderKing2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, like even chemists know how much space is between the electrons and the nucleus, and even if the atoms are bonded in molecules, you have tiny points with lots of space between them with absolutely no matter in between. The answer here was freaking electromagnetic fields.
@mommyaisha90572 жыл бұрын
Im a chemist and I also agree with you
@Laurennn Жыл бұрын
Some people are born to be teachers. Kate is one of them.
@vectorwolf Жыл бұрын
This is months old so I've no idea if anyone will see it, but the explanation of the lava lamp function isn't correct. Although it does contain oil and water, the process is thermal, not mechanical. The lamps have a fairly high voltage incandescent light in the base, this both serves to illuminate the lamp, and more importantly heat the heavier of the two liquids. It then floats to the top because it's density is reduced, until it cools off and drops back to the bottom. This is aided by the narrow top of the conical lamp, speeding the transfer of heat a bit. None of them that I've ever seen rely on carbonation.
@klas666Ай бұрын
Right! How in her explanation carbon dioxide is supposed to get back to the bottom to repeat the cycle?
@oblivion456022 жыл бұрын
The "not being able to pass your hand through a solid object" I thought was more due to electromagnetic repulsion (more of a physics question at that point). Loved the electron passing as gloves analogy bit, though.
@sven63452 жыл бұрын
8:28 unbelievably what?
@Sameeer_Saker2 жыл бұрын
I just love seeing people being excited to explain things
@nelly53762 жыл бұрын
Why did PJ's tweet make it in to this lmaoo
@djungelskog34342 жыл бұрын
My condolences to American chemistry students that have to use Fahrenheit
@Omar-wq9dz2 жыл бұрын
If she was my chemistry teacher, I would have made good grades, since I sucked at chemistry back when I was in high school