2.0L Turbo vs 3.6L Jeep Wrangler JL Which is better? Part 1 Road Test 0-60 mph

Which is the better choice, the 2.0L Turbo or the 3.6 V6 Jeep wrangler JL? For part 1 of this series Matt does a 0-60 MPH and a road test to see how they stand up against each other. The 2.0L 4 cylinder turbo is claimed to have more peak torque than the 3.6 V6, but how will it do in real world testing? Find out in this video and stay tuned for part 2!
Check out Jeep Wrangler JL parts from CJ's here:
www.cjponyparts.com/2018-jeep...
Subscribe to CJ Off-Road on KZbin here:
/ cjoffroad
Follow CJ Off-Road on Instagram here:
/ cjoffroad
Music Provided By:
www.epidemicsound.com/

[@JohnAhladis]

After driving both, the V6 was fine. But I was actually very impressed by the 2.0T. It was faster, quicker, better in general to drive, especially considering the majority of the time you are going to be driving on roads and in traffic.

[@gabrieldalcomune3044]

Bought a 2.0 and didn't really expect much from it, I'm much happier with it than having driven 3.6 JLs. Boosting around town and chugging along under 1.5k rpms means the e torque helps it and it just sips fuel.

[@Reptileman110]

@@gabrieldalcomune3044 So you're happier having gone with the 2.0 as compared to the V6 then?

[@wiltonhenriquez6613]

Reptileman110 yes I would like to know the answer as well thinking of getting the turbo

[@gabrieldalcomune3044]

@@Reptileman110 I'm absolutely happier than I would have been getting the v6, I like higher revving motors usually, but the torque around town is amazing. Not to mention averaging 22mpg a tank mixed driving.

[@gabrieldalcomune3044]

@@wiltonhenriquez6613 I would drive both, but I really love it. Very zippy motor. Although depending on how you drive, and the trans ecu learns your driving you might be frustrated with slow gear kick downs in certain scenarios. But that's something specific to the auto trans.

[@nukejr555]

I know the mods are minor but I think they should have tested completely stock and THEN retested with selected mods and compare all four measurements. Just too many variables for an objective assessment.

[@CJBroncoF150]

See if the 2 minor mods help out the V6 in part when we take them to the dyno 😜

[@MrYaxalot]

i doubt a catback and a intake helped a naturally aspirated v6 a whole lot the biggest thing is the 35's bumpers and stuff

[@chrisfisher8266]

This is the dumbest comparison, mods vs no mods

[@scottstrang8347]

I agree, w CAI and exhaust......it's possible you could get upwards of 10- 20 wheel hp.....maybe less but you could definitely feel that in the seat! Therefore , I feel the test is not valid in my opinion. I completely understand the point of it as their only quote minor mods ...... But those two mods together you can definitely feel a difference I say this from experience in my own cars. It's not drastic but it is a difference.

[@waltscrossfiresrt6]

Intake kexhaust and tune is at minimum 20 wheel hp definitely not a fair test a modded jeep vs a stock jeep

[@Northrendish]

testing a 0-60 starting from turning on a corner is just a waste of a test

[@CJBroncoF150]

0-60 in a jeep is already a laughable offense haha

[@AC7880]

@@CJBroncoF150 So you made it worse by starting with a turn??

[@nathanthomforde5079]

It looks like he started it on a turn but the speed goes down to zero after he turns then he pins it

[@cartermackenzie1135]

I swear my 2.0t is about a second quicker than that, and other tests have shown otherwise too

[@youtubetv1588]

@@CJBroncoF150 you’re a special kind of stupid

[@joeriley353]

I live in Moab Utah. The jeeping mecca of the world. I have owned and spent lots of time in modified 3.6 jks. I have also spent time behind the wheel of modified 3.6 JLs.All Rubicons. I recently got to spend time behind the wheel of a 2.0 turbo on 37s. With the stock 4.10 gears. It flat impressed me. It is the personal JLU of the owner of one of the biggest jeep rental / guide business in the West. The owner has a fleet of JLs. And the pick of what to drive for her personal use. She drives the 2.0 for a reason. It makes those 37s feel stock. A 3.6 does not. It also works great at slow speed rock crawling. Thanks in part to the electric motor helping the turbo at low rpms . I ask her how is the gas mileage. She said she's to busy drag race 3.6 jeeps to care. I have been waiting for the JLU diesel. I am seriously considering scrapping that plan and getting the Turbo, because when the tunes come out for it, this thing's gonna rip .

[@armandcouture4655]

Joe Riley see that is what I am thinking as well, in my choice of JL engine! Now coming from folks that have much experience in the Jeep community this is swaying my decision and confirming my hunch on which way to go! It is just that 48 volt battery underneath that is the only concern. How will the turbo hold up over time, especially if off roading.

[@OlympusReptiles]

@@JG-od3xy that is EXACTLY what I did. No looking back

[@eyeofhoruswadjet4236]

Definitely not talking about Nena at Barlow, lol...

[@CJBroncoF150]

Thanks for the feedback!!!

[@sinepari9160]

still waiting on those tunes?

[@eyeofhoruswadjet4236]

As far as long term mod-ability, the aftermarket support for the 2.0 is great. With an intercooler pipe, tuner, exhaust and pedal commander, I can run 37's without regearing and still pull very strong off the line.

[@DECDEC1220]

I test drove both the 2.0t and the 3.6 with the 8 speed auto back to back. Not just once but three times. Both jeeps were equally loaded. The 2.0t pulled significantly harder and easily beat the 3.6 to 60. The only thing better about the 3.6 was engine sound.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Great point, thanks for watching!

[@JorJor812]

Flowmasters on it sound amazing!

[@streetfighter398]

@@JG-od3xy the 3.6 is proven besides the fact that it likes to eat lifters

[@TheSavage3.6]

the 3.6 is also far more reliable and can be supercharged.

[@SomeOne-ce1gf]

Turbo all day

[@nelsonss3200]

If you live in a very high city way over sea level like we have here in Mexico , the jeep V6 will lost so much power like 80 HP while the turbo lost like 40 HP , I think on that situation being over 2000 ft sea level the turbo JL will definitely feel much more powerful

[@SteveCrainMusic]

The problem with this test, as many, is that it's done at sea level. If you come up to altitude, in Colorado, where we START tests at 5500 feet and take them to 12,000 feet above sea level, is that the 3.2l V-6 is almost gutless at altitude. In contrast, the 2l turbo will easily do 90 mph at 12,000 feet - and do it without hesitation and with aplomb.

[@CJBroncoF150]

I think that sounds like a good excuse to go to colorado!

[@philliprader6298]

Great video!! Thanks for this. So excited to see how the diesel is. Diesel + manual= epic.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Thank you!

[@jaredbell174]

I have had many 4x4 and off road vehicles. I have 2 Jeep JL's and both are 2.0. Love them!

[@CJBroncoF150]

Great to hear!

[@carwarz]

sweet video, keep up great work

[@CJBroncoF150]

Thanks!!!

[@Ryan-1337]

I probably do 60% Highway, 40% city stop and go and my 2021 2 door Wrangler sport with the 3.6 is giving me a combined range of 22 to 24 MPG. I really am pleasantly surprised by the fuel economy for the NA V6. Course its a different story when I take it out to the mountains and trails. But still nice to be able to have that kind of fuel economy with a capable rig.

[@Nick-os3ue]

I have driven the 2 and the turbo feels way faster then the V6

[@chappy187]

Same. Drove two Saharas exactly the same except the engine. The 2.0t felt way faster and had much more torque than the V6

[@williamhernandez8526]

@@chappy187 I actually own the turbo version and drove them back to back with the V6. Way more torque with the 2.0T. Maybe they were using 89 octane gas or something.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Interesting, i felt that the v6 had some more power low end!

[@cedricolivera4989]

I have had a 2014 JKU Rubicon V6 and now a 2018 JLU Rubicon 2.0 turbo. I drove both 2018 JLU V6 and 2018 JLU 2.0. And the JLU is way faster than the JKU and the 2.0 is way faster than the V6

[@pablomax3045]

Did you notice the 5mpg difference between the two? That is 4000 bucks over 50k miles at current fuel prices. Looks like the 2.0 pays for itself. Of course, you go slightly slower on your 0-60, which apparently is why people buy wranglers.

[@mountainknife]

Am I the only one here for the fuel millage

[@gordmccann6258]

Then why did u buy a Jeep?

[@krwiles]

​​@@gordmccann6258exactly! you don't put a condom on unless you're gonna screw and you don't buy a Jeep for fuel mileage. LOL

[@SomeOne-ce1gf]

Lmao please return your jeep and let someone deserving have it go buy an Acura kid

[@Godlovesuse4real]

I just subscribed. I love 💕 this channel. Keep up your good work 😍🥰

[@jackdeyoung2576]

I'm from Uniontown and man I miss home. Love the views and vid. Thanks

[@CJBroncoF150]

Thanks for watching! Stop by and see the shop when you're home!

[@c130aviator]

I'm from uniontown too.

[@alejandromaclean3666]

I'm so happy i got the turbo, so much FUN

[@CJBroncoF150]

Great choice!!

[@qualitysteamcarpetcleaning1710]

Do you have to put premium gas in it to get that extra HP and torque

[@alejandromaclean3666]

@@qualitysteamcarpetcleaning1710 I always use premium gas and it runs great. 👍

[@TheV8Hooligan]

Hmm. I’ll I can say is I drove both bone stock from the dealer. The turbo was the best choice. Lots of get up and go and with the e torque you don’t need premium fuel but it give you more power.

[@themajorimage]

Love this video!!

[@CJBroncoF150]

We love that you love it!

[@jaysuttle1269]

ANOTHER GREAT VIDEO 👍

[@CJBroncoF150]

Thanks for watching!

[@alecpupshis3512]

that exhaust sounds sweet in the V6

[@CJBroncoF150]

Thanks!

[@trophyhunterssupplyllc7163]

I agree with the videos findings, the V6 feels quicker 0-60 and in passing power as well. Im glad you were able to do the test with a lift and larger tires as that’s what most end up doing to them.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Thanks for the comment!

[@phrogusmc]

My 2.0T is much better accelerating at any RPM than my 3.6 Gladiator was. Both Jeeps running 35" tires. Acceleration on the V6 suffered greatly with the 35s. With the 2.0T, it doesn't even notice the larger tires. It drives great and passing is effortless. Also, the 2.0T can benefit more from a tune than the 3.6. I run 91-93 octane in the 2.0T. You lose power if you only run 87 in it.

[@garyvanmeter4911]

@@phrogusmc How much did the mpg drop from using 87 octane? Was the performance drop really noticeable?

[@phrogusmc]

@@garyvanmeter4911 I don't know. I've never put less than 91 in my 2.0, as that's the minimum that the manual suggests to use, as the vehicle is factory tuned for 91.

[@darrellfolk5284]

Great Video! As soon as you said Pennsylvania I'm like OHH I wonder where!

[@jeeptds]

Really informative comparison 👍

[@CJBroncoF150]

Thanks for watching!

[@josephwhiskeybeale]

I really expected more from the turbo, but I have to say I’d probably go for the tried and true V6 anyway.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Same boat here, i've got the 3.6 in my JK. -Matt

[@pablomax3045]

@@CJBroncoF150 so.. someone bought the v6, therefore it isn't allowed to be worse. I guess that's why when your co-driver said it felt exactly the same to him, you said.. yeah, but I'm going to give it to the V6. Maybe it just "sounds" faster to you?

[@sbiruli]

Look with attention...he give power too late with the 20l turbo when already two seconds are passed...in the real time 20l turbo 0-60 is in 7.5 seconds

[@30smsuperstrat]

Go drive them. They're night and day. The 4 cylinder is much quicker, and torque just crushes the 6. It has less when you're above 60 and mash it.

[@lancebangwell]

If you're going to mod the engine, the turbo will give you more headroom to modify, I wonder if that i4 can run flexfuel... The NA V6 maybe a few hp with bolt on mods.

[@fahd3228]

Hi CJ Thanks for the content . It is a great thing Jeep is offering two engine options In general I'm a traditionalist I like NA V6 and V8 engines especially for a daily driver. The other point I want to make here is Jeep wrangler is not about going fast , If I want to go fast and really care about 0-60 times then I would get a muscle/sport car.

[@speedtriprr537]

I never planned to ever own a Jeep but after driving this turbo Jeep on vacation this week I am sold. I loved the engine then taking the doors off and the roof I couldn’t deny how great the Jeep is.

[@Mark-iz5in]

any regrets with not getting a manual?

[@speedtriprr537]

@@Mark-iz5in it’s a jeep

[@jamesSmith-fl5wv]

Thank you for this video I am buying a Jeep soon and was trying to figure out my engine and now I’m picking the 6 over the turbo

[@jamesSmith-fl5wv]

After trying both engines I actually bought the turbo. So much nicer

[@jbivvy420]

I got a 2019 JL 2.0 and it is pretty good. No issues on most trails i've taken

[@Catman1798]

Awesome awesome video!!!! Right to the point. I have a 2015 renegade trailhawk but I use to have the 2011 challenger v6 and a 2015 challenger v8 hemi don’t ask why the two. Lol. I think I preferred the v6 honestly. It was a good engine for the challenger. The hemi was just way too much power for my taste anyway. The 3.6 v6 was just right. As for the Jeep Wrangler I don’t know how it would feel with a heavy wrangler. But I would trust the V6 over that new turbo one any day. And based on your tests I think the v6 performed better. Do a Jeep renegade test next please lol I love watching renegade videos on here.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Thank you very much for watching, please subscribe :)

[@ScottParisi]

Good video. Since I ordered mine with a clutch, I only had one option. Would love to see this comparison with the diesel.

[@OverlandTT]

I'm glad I've found your channel, looking forward to this comparison. When the JL launches in the UK they're now only offering the 2 litre turbo and a 2.2 "multi jet" - whatever that it.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Thank you, make sure you subscribe :)

[@OverlandTT]

@@CJBroncoF150 For sure!

[@biteuk]

2.2 Multi-jet is a diesel engine

[@OverlandTT]

@@biteuk yea I know - it’s called sarcasm 🤣

[@biteuk]

Going to test drive a 2.0t at the weekend. Hope it does what it says on the tin 😉

[@ramrunner3199]

I like the v6 a lot it’s a great engine and take to boost extremely well! Look up ripp supercharges on the 3.6 so much potential from pentastar

[@CJBroncoF150]

I had a ripp kit on my JK and absolutely loved it!

[@whiteelk427]

All good comments, but here it is. Turbo was jerky in the 2.0 and I didn't feel the comfort was there. But the 3.6 felt like a smoova, you know the heavy iron she hit him with. That turbo is like country or rap, nice for the youngster, but the 3.6 is for those of us that love the blues. I'm getting a smoova. 3.6🤗👍

[@revelation13_9]

We just got 26 average MPG with our 2023 Jeep Wrangler Sport 2-door 3.6 e-torque with 8-speed auto from Monterey, CA to Sacramento, CA averaging 68 MPH. It was loaded with three passengers and luggage. Acceleration is outstanding too. Very happy and it's a blast to drive.

[@sinepari9160]

That's why I love owning a Jeep. If I'm doing the speed limit I definitely know and can compensate.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Right on!

[@emgeesea3983]

I have a 2020 2-door JL, and have to disagree with many of the 2.0 enthusiasts here. When buying my JL, I test drove both engines, in identically equipped 2-door Willys JLs. I had intended to buy the 2.0 when on my way to the dealership, but after test driving, the 2.0 just seemed weaker to me - like it had to try harder to accelerate, maintain highway speed, etc. The 3.6, in contrast, felt like it pulled effortlessly all the time. Just my opinion, but I ended up buying the Willys with the 3.6. (I would agree that at elevations high above sea level the turbo would have an advantage, but at sea level I'm not so sure.) But, we all have our opinions, which is what makes social media the annoying medium that is! ;)

[@raygreeninfo]

I have a 21 2 door Rubicon with the 2.0 turbo and thoroughly enjoy the low rpm torque. The majority of driving is in town and in city traffic so this is where this type of performance shines.

[@arnoldopublisher7879]

Good video!

[@hanesemail5931]

I don't know what 2.0 these guys tested but mine does 0-60 in 5.9 seconds. It is a stock 4 door Sport. I am VERY happy with it.

[@fuhjk502]

The difference in performance is very close. But if you look at both on a dyno the V6 has a much more consistent output of torque. And the new Eboost electric motor adds even more torque to the V6 when you need it. For the street not a big deal but for off road that's what you want. Also the Pentastar V6 is a bullet proof dependable motor that's been out for years in many different vehicles. The 4 banger turbo has not proved itself and turbos are expensive when they go bad. I spent the extra money for the V6 it's worth it.

[@TrackDayVideo]

Please be sure to do same comparison with the EcoDiesel when it comes out

[@PURPLEBUTTERFLY671]

Kelly Hatcher when is that coming out

[@TrackDayVideo]

It could happen any day in new scrambler truck and JL wrangler

[@TrackDayVideo]

It could happen any day in new scrambler truck and JL wrangler

[@TrackDayVideo]

It could happen any day in new scrambler truck and JL wrangler

[@TrackDayVideo]

It could happen any day in new scrambler truck and JL wrangler

[@MrYaxalot]

There gonna have some good tunes for that 2.0 turbo soon

[@CJBroncoF150]

Oh yes they are!

[@stephengoodman4431]

You make a good video kid.... i subscribed

[@walden6272]

I only have experience with the 2.0L and gotta say, it's fantastic. It is very quick, faster than my toyota and still gets pretty decent gas mileage. If only it could mimic the engine sound of the V6, then it would be perfect.

[@vonrodlimpot8797]

Put borla attack exhaust

[@Ferda1964]

I will say that most of guys and some girls that have at least some limited knowledge of engine mechanics will go for the 3.6 L. Those that always crave the newest and most modern will go for turbo.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Good point for sure

[@XxggxX8]

Really love my 3.6 jlu 😇 . We don’t use stop start much in ky.

[@thuggoe]

I rented the v6 4-door. it was a beast

[@one100billneoone4]

My 2005 RubiHara LJ (726 of 1000) has the 4.0 with 6 speed. Good power and still feels great. Completely stock and will never be modified. Love that 4.0L il6 engine. In my opinion I think the 4.0L is better overall.

[@CJBroncoF150]

4.0L is one of the best engines ever made!

[@WestCoastJeeper]

@@CJBroncoF150 totally agree! Miss my TJ due to the 4.0! Always wanted an LJ but only ever saw one for sale over here in the UK! Have had a 2.8 Diesel JKU for 11 years now! but looking to change it for a 3.6 JKU, impossible to get a 3.6 JLU over here unless I import one. Great videos by the way @CJ Off-Road!

[@rgs455atw]

What is the gas milage comparison? Around town and on the highways? Since the i4 requires premium gas, which is more expensive, do you really save any money by by going with the i4?

[@CJBroncoF150]

MPG test is coming soon!

[@jronald262]

Great video! Towing test coming soon?

[@CJBroncoF150]

Thanks for watching and the kind words! We can do a towing video here soon!

[@spitfire155k2]

Had both, 2.0L Turbo ALL DAY!!!!

[@docholliday6285]

3.6 hands down. Proven. Add to that longevity over a turbo.

[@CJBroncoF150]

The 3.6 is a great engine!

[@DillyDillyBar]

The jeeps have different mods, different tires, etc. Hard to compare 0-60 40-60 etc but it was a good attempt and good info. I can tell you first hand my wifes stock Unlimited Rubicon 2.0 beat the heck out of my stock Unlimited Rubicon 3.6. You can feel the butt in seat in the 2.0 a lot more than the 3.6

[@XxAlexanderProxx]

Hi Jeff, how are they holding up? what engine would you say is doing better for you?

[@robertsoria9293]

@@XxAlexanderProxx 3.6 is going to last longer

[@biteuk]

Why is it going to last longer. The 3.6 is higher revving, so more wear and tear?

[@justinhardt1]

Tune, Intake and exhaust and the 2.0L will be a beast. Tune is key for turbos.

[@CJBroncoF150]

That's what i'm hearing!

[@bobquattrini1787]

My Jeep Cherokee xj has almost 400,000 miles and is just like new...4.0 AW4 BEAST!!!!

[@CJBroncoF150]

Send it all the way to 500,000!! Thanks for watching!

[@mikeeast8322]

Drove both and got the 3.6 manual.

[@tonimathias-grumley6631]

WTF? Air intake and other mods on the V6 comparing to a stock eTorque? Not a correct comparison at all.

[@josephkool8411]

Air intake aint gonna do nothing without a tune. it might even slow it down.

[@monsterpoo]

@@josephkool8411 intake+ exhaust will add power without a tune... the ecu will change timing in the fly for minor mods like that , its not like you're adding forced induction and huge power to where the stock ECU cant compensate enough for all the extra compressed air the intake+ exhaust on that 3.6L probably added 10-20 hp, so while may not sound like a lot but on a 285 hp motor that's about 4-7% increase in power.... enough to make the review not apples to apples

[@mjo23dan]

Not sure if asked but why is the 2.0L not offered in manual? It defaults to automatic. When I try to do a build on Jeep’s website, manual defaults to the 3.6L.

[@RepublicanJesusthe2nd]

Nice shades.

[@CJBroncoF150]

"who's behind those foster grants"

[@serkanister3620]

Why I feeling you bias towards 3.6?

[@KNIGHTRACEDOTCOM]

when they make a chip for the turbo it will add about 90 hp.

[@CJBroncoF150]

I'm not trust me!

[@muhammadwahidy4684]

@@KNIGHTRACEDOTCOM got only 30hp out of it

[@KNIGHTRACEDOTCOM]

@@muhammadwahidy4684 well that was less than I hoped for.. the 3.6 has seemingly been a good motor.

[@AboxofMonsters]

The V6 really sounds good.

[@blakehyslop2605]

said no one ever

[@rondail5675]

Very interesting. I have preferred a V6 to a 4cly\turbo. I was worried when the 4cyl showed more torque and at a lower RPM. I feel good with the evaluation and outcome. Thanks. I just bought a 2019 Honda Ridgeline with the 6-speed, kind-of wish I had the 9-speed now.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Good pick, thanks for watching!

[@cwyoming7004]

What mpg observations have you made? I just spent a week and 800mi in a 2017 in Hawaii where I averaged 18.5. It was all pavement mixed city/hwy. You have a couple sweet jeeps, thanks for the videos.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Find out when we release part 2 😎

[@TxJK18]

Differences V6= reliable, proven easy maintenance. Turbo= unknown reliability, high maintenance, overall more expensive, complicated cooling system.

[@MrAbsentdriver]

Ivan Shabelev the 3.6 in my jeep has been a dog. The borings in the block for the heater keeps clogging up. The fix is a 1,700$ bill from the dealership. This has happened two years in a row. The turd of a jeep is for sale now. Jeep would not stand by ther product on this one. I am a jeep fan. But jeep is losing my love on this one. My opinion-3.6 is not reliable

[@TxJK18]

@@MrAbsentdriver I feel ya, bro, I have been pretty lucky with mine knock on wood, but that turbo engine is Italian made and they are not famous for being reliable, in fact FCA had a lot of issues with even fires before releasing it for sale. The Pentastar while not a Toyota engine is pretty reliable of course there are some bad troublesome units out there and then the problem is FCA being a pain to fix the issues and providing good costumer service

[@TheDevonParker]

Turbos have been common for 40 years, how do you consider them unproven or unreliable?

[@TxJK18]

@@TheDevonParker it's not the Turbo is the engine itself and the Hybrid interaction. That engine is not just a turbo engine it has a hybrid system with batteries for fuel economy

[@nukejr555]

I have had 2011 JK (3.8); 2014 JKU (3.6); & current 2018 JKU (3.6). All get light off-road duty. I really hated the sluggish 3.8 but did what it needed to. Not a single issue with the 3.6 and most of my friends have not said much either. I wish they would put a Hemi in one; there is room. I have been considering a JL to add to my toys. I am not yet sure the 4 banger is worth the price of admission. With several recalls, negligible difference in performance numbers on road and economy. I would rather spend that difference on proven engine bolt-ons. I will wait a year or two and see what improves.

[@palanthis]

The 4L straight six in the TJs was the last great engine in a Wrangler. Everything else is a compromise forced by emission and economy standards. My TJ Rubicon could literally idle up most trails in 4L 1st gear. Just let the clutch out and watch it climb. I miss that rig...

[@dougcoleburn1579]

I had a 06 Impact orange 6 speed Rubicon. What a Billy goat in 4lo!!!

[@joaquinmorales3016]

My 2.0 Jeep get 8.10 sec on 37's with 4.56 gear ratios and k&n air intake, what do you think. It s a good time?

[@mixflip]

How is a turbo engine off road and rock crawling? I know cooling is important for turbos. Rock crawling probably doesn't help keep them turbos cool at all Im guessing. Would need very strong and reliable electric fans.

[@DimplesChild401]

The fans kick on as needed to keep it cool.

[@mixflip]

@@DimplesChild401 I saw a video from the rubicon trail. Those new jeep cooling fans were insanely loud when rock crawling at 1mph.

[@kpfalconi]

Is the gearing for both the same? That would definitely make a difference in 0 to 60 acceleration.

[@phrogusmc]

Even if they were the same gearing, the 2.0t makes 47lbs-ft more torque to the wheels than the 3.6 does and only 6rwhp less, when dyno'd side-by-side. There's a video here on youtube of 2 identical stock JL's (3.6 and 2.0t) pulling dyno runs. I've owned a 3.6 JT and now 2.0t JLUR, and we also have a 3.6 JKUR. The 2.0t just outshines the 3.6 in acceleration. And all of them were/are on 35s. The 2.0 still pulls hard with the larger tires and builds speed quickly.

[@marceld6061]

I think the 'performance' from the 3.6 going up the hill was all 'in your ears'. If you were only doing 50 anyway, about the only difference you would get would be the sound coming out of the tailpipe. That's the difference I got from the video. You were holding a steady speed and not passing anything, so....

[@JosephSmith72]

Good video comparison. Now that you did the hill climbs and the runs stock with no freight inside the vehicles why don’t you load the vehicle down and have a trailer and see how they both preform most guys load the stuff up full of gear when it comes to going camping etc. so will be interesting to see how these engines perform when they’re fully loaded. Thanks I hit the sub button.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Thanks for the ideas, and also thanks for watching!

[@davidchamides]

did you max out each gear separately? does it make a difference?

[@juanticimo]

This is an interesting video in many ways. I drove both the 3.6 and the 2.0T before ultimately buying the 2.0T. They were actually very close in comparison when i drove them. I wonder if the 2.0T in this video was using 87 or premium unleaded. If i put 87 in my 2.0T its quite a bit slower, and this seems like how it would be. The 2.0T was faster than the 3.6 when i drove them back to back, so thats kind of puzzling. Not only that but a lot of other reviews show that the 2.0T was faster.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Its definitely a close comparison!

[@khyoon14]

They used 87 no doubt. Dumbasses

[@DimplesChild401]

Turbo definitely performs better with Premium Fuel.

[@channell11]

Stock to stock, the two engines perform very similarly, but the 2.0T gets a lot better gas mileage and has a lot more modification potential. We have a 2.0T with BSG and it's very peppy. You can definitely see the impact of bigger tires without re-gearing and the lift. Factory 2 doors with the 2.0 can get under 6 seconds to 60 and easily in mid 20s for mpg. That 8 speed does let you get away with a lot in terms of tires and gearing without paying a major price.

[@walden6272]

Agreed. I have a 2 door 2023 Jeep Wrangler with 2.0 engine and it is very fast. I did not expect a Jeep to be so fast.

[@Spoolingturbski]

The 2.0 turbo was way better for everyday driving. It was a literal rocket ship. The V6 felt lethargic in comparison

[@Ken-qq6gp]

Which one actually burns more fuel ? Also do you require Supreme gas to achieve those numbers in the V4 ?

[@steveburrington4288]

Would be nice to see 0-60 comparison in a straight line

[@Adam_Newman]

My cousin has a 2019 2.0l with 34000 miles and no issues as of yet

[@CJBroncoF150]

thats awesome

[@brodiwheeler7583]

No discussion of the E-Torque??? No discussion of the required or recommended grade of fuel for the turbo???

[@fourbypete]

I'm still waiting for Jeep to release the 3.0ltr diesel from the grand Cherokee crd for the JKU Wrangler in Australia. Supposed to be coming in 2020.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Yessss

[@spartanj2957]

Just picked up the 3.6 ,you can keep the turbo.I disconnected the stop / start you can have it too.

[@thomaswood5246]

I had the 3.6 in a 2012 and got the 3.6 in my 19. Yes, the 4 banger has power but it is working really hard or pushed hard to put out those specs. Im guessing the 4cly will not have any sort of longevity.

[@DimplesChild401]

Still pumping strong in my 2020 2.0T. Currently running 33’s on 20’s. My goal this year is to get it ready for 40’s. 7k to run it right, but it will be a beast on and off-road when I’m done.

[@spartanj2957]

I will also agree none diesel engines don't last and hold up as well with turbos.Heat is a turbos enemy too.

[@wardholbrook1478]

I'd be interested in knowing how the two engines compare at higher elevations. Normally aspirated engines loose approximately 2.5% power per 1000' of "density" altitude. (You pilots will understand this) For those of us living in the mountain west will probably find the the 2.0L Turbo will be the engine of choice.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Good next video idea!

[@terrywaters6186]

Take the extra $1,000 the turbo 2.0 cost and put it towards putting a turbo on your 3.6 and there would be no contest.

[@beunbad]

@@terrywaters6186 so you will only have to spend another $6800-7500 then.

[@hedydd2]

The four cylinder seemed much quieter. How do these things perform in crash tests? How would I be after sliding it at 30mph into a tree on the trail?

[@CJBroncoF150]

Idk about 30 mph on the trail into a tree, but they hold up pretty well!

[@NorthernRiderOffroad]

I'd like to see how the new motors size up against the older 4.0 I6.

[@CJBroncoF150]

Oh yess

[@garysisk3431]

had the 4.0 in my old Cherokee, have the 3.6 in my new Grand Cherokee. I love both engines, but difficult to compare. The 8 speed tranny in the GC overcomes any lack of power situation of the 3.6, if there is any. The 3.6 is more fuel efficient, smoother on the highway, way quieter, and doesn't leak any oil. Offroad down low torque would probably go to the 4.0, but really don't know as my GC is a bad weather highway vehicle.

[@Kschnabs14]

I love CJ and most their uploads. I’ve owned a 5.0 GTPP and supported them. I drove the V6 and 2.0T Wrangler back to back. The 2.0T felt way BETTER. I refused to trade my modded 5.0 for the V6 but I’m more than happy with my 2.0T after 6700 miles. CJ I feel is not running the 2.0T on 93 octane or fanboying the V6. I’ll continue to watch them but I feel this review is completely wrong

[@CJBroncoF150]

Dang, well i own a v6 however i enjoy driving the 4 cylinder on the trail, this review was just my opinion, so it can be interpreted!

[@Kschnabs14]

Wasn’t meant to be an attack. Either way if you are in the V6 or the 2.0T, end of the day you are in a Jeep and you made the right choice

[@eyeofhoruswadjet4236]

Dude, this is a bust. Different models (unlimited vs 2dr), different mods (intake, exhaust, 35's, etc). This is conjecture. Fake news

[@mustafasarhang999]

please help me should I choose 2.0 turbo or 3.6 v6 and which one spend more fuel thanks .

[@PoppaSimTV]

thinking about getting the 2.0l turbo rubicon... do u think 37s with a 3 inch lift would be ok or would it be too strenuous for the 4 cylinder?

[@CJBroncoF150]

That would be perfect!

[@Mightymerc1]

Maybe I missed it, but I was hoping for some real world MPG numbers. My JK has the 3.6 and my fuel economy sucks. Can you cover that in the next episode?

[@CJBroncoF150]

Yes, MPGs will be in a future episode 😎

[@TheSchmed]

I’m getting about 14 mpg driving locally, 2016 Wrangler Unlim 75th Anniversary.

[@stevenp3176]

Driving a brick with a 4x4 drivetrain is always going to suck on MPGs. Nothing on the JL is going to make a meaningful difference. Is what it is.

[@daveyoung465]

You missed the part where the v6 has exhaust and cool air intake

[@eda7875]

I have a 2door JL with the 8 speed auto. I get 24-27 MPG highway. 18-22 city. 25 and 26 is what i get most commonly on the highway, and 21 is the most common city. Just accelerate slowly. Stock AT tires. his is not bad at all for a jeep wrangler. If you raise it and put bigger mud tires youll drop MPGs considerably. The JL is NOT a brick, they put some effort to make it more aerodynamic and I notice a huge differencr from the JK. The wrangler JL is to me the best jeep ever made, and I am sorry for all the italian haters out there. I think the turbo engine is a bold innovative move and quite awesome, but I still prefer the V6 for obvious reasons.

[@onthecheap6292]

3.6

[@mikeyoutsler4443]

I have a 2020 JL two-door turbo. I feel like you gave it an honest review. I appreciate your honesty. It does lag a little while waiting for the turbo.

[@rivett40]

Mine is the 2020 2.0 it moves pretty good I’m also factory tires and wheels I won’t be going over 33son it

[@Montyhugo]

If anything? I'm thinking that the v-6 will outlast the turbo 4🤷‍♂️

[@cordellej]

3.0l turbocharged v6 diesel and a 6 speed manual then ill buy one

[@rocketman3776]

cordellej how about a 5.9L Cummins....

[@seanhenry8030]

@@rocketman3776 The 5.9 is great, but it sorta misses the point. I'm with 3 liter turbo manual guy on this one. I'd probably still buy it in auto if it was the only option, provided it was a durable, high gear count unit.

[@rjhaney804]

They've already released that they will NOT be offering a manual with the 3.0 diesel. Which makes me sad.

[@taxi615]

It would make sense putting the Mercedes 3L diesel but that would bring these jeeps over 70K lol. I predict in 5 years only doctors will be able to afford a jeep. in the last 10 years jeeps have gone up by 7000$ I remember when you could buy a sport for 21K new now they are 34K and you have less options to choose from. A Rubicon was 38K it's ridiculous.

[@CJBroncoF150]

We would too!

[@RickNethery]

I would go with the V6, it's naturally aspirated and doesn't need "a mild hybrid system" to make up for anything. 😉

[@slscamg]

I think the best part about this is that the Jeep has two really great power trains to choose from. Go test drive a forerunner with the 4 L and the five speed in the jeep feels like a rocket shipping comparison. My money is on the 3.6 just because if it’s track record, the 2.0t has had some oil consumption issues in the Alfas and as much as Jeep says you can run regular 87 in the turbo, when it gets really hot outside, you can definitely feel it start to pull timing and then you’re stuck with the expensive premium fuel.

[@Xicuter84]

Jl owners manual 2.0 full synthetic oil, min 91 octane fuel, spark plugs changed every 10k miles V6 reg oil, cheap gas, spark plugs every 30k The 2.0 will cost more than the V6 and never recover any of the cost difference if you follow the manual. Personally I own the 2.0, I doubt the dealer ever read the manual otherwise I'd probably have taken the v6

[@b0lbi]

Pay close attention to oil. It must have a specific rating or you will shoot rods out

[@bankayhoodlum]

also, calculate ($/gal)/(mpg) = ($/mi) and you can see there isn’t much of a difference and that a 2 door, manual tranny v6 has tge lowest $/mi in the jeep wrangler line up

[@armandcouture4655]

Very True. I agree. Is it more fun to drive? More torque

[@Bajaheat]

Xicuter84 spark plugs every 10k? Bs lol you sure it didn’t say 100k

[@Bajaheat]

Evin Jacobs it’s not diesel...

[@TheBudgetAquarist]

A turbo is just another thing to break and when I want to race I don't jump in my jeep! The 3.6 moves just fine!

[@piotrk1047]

would like to have seen mpg difference as well, how well they suck up fuel going up this hill ...

[@shelbyinstigator1727]

This comparison is ridiculous. Modded v6 vs unmodded turbo 4. How great. I test drove both and the turbo 4 is easily the better engine. Chose it without hesitation