Crash Test Against Truck - 30 Cars from $7K to $230K. Who is the Safest？30款车碰40吨卡车，揽胜迈巴赫PK小米问界谁更安全？

[@andreasausmuc]

THAT is the most spectacular crash test procedure I've EVER watched! Thank you very much for those absolutely amazing results!

[@DCARSTUDIO]

Follow us to get more amazing contents hhh

[@undisclosedthai]

Very rich automotive media company in China. It can perform mega crash test.

[@Shawn-o4z8y]

Awesome 🎉🎉🎉 I buy benz G today 🎉🎉

[@Shawn-o4z8y]

Wow i buy model 3 now let’s go elon 🎉🎉🎉

[@Shawn-o4z8y]

I’m laoban i dont wanna ride in range rover

[@edzen6122]

this is by far the most spectacular crash test ever made

[@rayeonlee]

In disbelieve that I am watching this for free, it almost feels illegal. Phenomenal production quality to say the least.

[@leedehao]

Range Rover with Tata level of safety, Good job!

[@nsglcck]

Not surprising, Tata owns Range Rover.

[@arapaimagold8088]

Not as bad as Zeeker, they own Volvo and still perform poorly.

[@mlxdc88]

​@@arapaimagold8088how much a range rover, and how much a zeekr, you should be ashame comparing those😅

[@jishnu6675]

​@@nsglcckLol😂😂😂😂 Asper your knowledge Lamborghini is a German car

[@andresfelipechandianunez2028]

@@nsglcckdon’t you say.

[@peterpanda1970]

If Range Rover was already a no-no… After watching this it’s a so very NO NO

[@heyy._ryann]

I think the real problem here is your bank account 🗣️💋

[@peterpanda1970]

@ naaahh, I find them too flashy and useless for the city and no need to talk about the unreliability since they’re in hands of TATA.

[@no-damn-alias]

spotted the gold digger

[@heyy._ryann]

@@peterpanda1970 have u ever owned one? If so, say some unreliability problems u had 😍

[@heyy._ryann]

@@no-damn-alias who? Lol

[@ghunterforever]

我听到了不少关于这个测试有疑问的声音，但是我很感谢有人来做这个测试。 的确这种测试的初衷是为了卡车后架的安全设定标准， 但是在这个时间节点上，除非绝大多数的卡车已经安装了安全后架， 否则这就是一个很现实的场景。 我也期望测试项目未来也会与时俱进， 和未来公路场景保持强关联性。

[@zoz1679]

法規問題而已 小車加強結構跟本沒用成本太高 最便宜就是從大車那改

[@ghunterforever]

@zoz1679 谁都知道如何做最经济，但是区别是你无法掌控所有因素。

[@zoz1679]

​@@ghunterforever 修法大車防護裝置 檢驗是否合格 如果檢驗不合格要重罰 甚至造成死亡需承擔刑責

[@tennyho3236]

中國大陸的卡車安全後架基本聊勝於無

[@Leed831100]

所有的标准碰撞测试都是让不同的车尽量撞击车身同一个部位来做对比，只有它这个测试让不同车撞不同的部位，那还有啥公平可言

[@Mattisttam]

Canadian viewer here and I’m so glad that this footage is available. Thank you for performing these tests!

[@markmd9]

You should definitely have a dubbed translation because the tests you do have a global interest.

[@smog535]

Or subs available in 10-20 most spoken languages.

[@PersonManManManMan]

​@smog535 that's really good, but English would be really nice

[@qiyuanbao778]

Yeah it's pretty easy to apply ai voice nowdays

[@pablopicaro7649]

Superb "real world" test. Applaud the Bravery of DCAR to take on this challenge! No doubt making some strong angry management at the Auto Companies around the world,

[@RomieMocka]

Oh man, this is the most expensive crash test in one video i've ever seen... Thumbs up ❤

[@AIRDRAC]

I'm truly impressed with the G-class and Maybach being able to protect the passengers as much as they do, considering how extremely heavy both vehicles are! It really seems that this type of crash favors either cars that are low enough to keep the passengers head out of the way of the corner of the container, or something ridiculously tall (like an American pick up or SUV) that would probably hit the corner of the container with the hood, helping slow down the vehicle before the passenger compartment.

[@kavelab699]

Tesla and Volvo are the safest, but the Xiaomi also held up better than I expected. Very well done video!

[@yuding237]

This needs to go viral asap so manufacturers start properly engineering and accounting for truck collisions!

[@ghostrider-be9ek]

nothing to do with regulations whatsoever - you need to contact your legislature in your country

[@EwenorKvM]

Truck collisions maybe a major issue in China. In many countries trucks & trailers have been redesigned to counter such fatal results. Check statistics elsewhere.

[@B2gboi]

@@EwenorKvM China is the largest auto market in the world, doesn't matter. People are spending 2-300 grand on these cars they should be rock solid in any scenario regarding safety. Europeans getting arrogant and complacent.

[@JeremySMJ]

Truck collisions matter more in China because they are literally everywhere. It's the largest export nation on earth and manufactured a third of all goods in the world. This isn't a primary concern for people living elsewhere

[@Emilthehun]

Best crash test ever. Interesting to see how for 50 years they been trying to get a "safer" trailer on the road , but changes are few and far between.

[@007mjy]

Apparently, the truck is the safest. Conclusion: we should all buy and drive a truck

[@DCARSTUDIO]

Your ideas are very different

[@FEGTTTSDH]

Exactly the opposite what did you see? RR or G class?

[@MarsPLAYStudio]

Really would like to see a model y with its panoramic roof and no pillar in the middle

[@killkiss_son]

Model Y's A piller is chunky.

[@nabieladrian]

How is this free to watch on KZbin? This could've been aired on national TVs! Excellent work!

[@valentin0000]

Driving a Tesla Model 3, I feel very safe now :D Great testing, thanks from Germany!

[@erraldstyler]

Actually one of the safest cars you can buy, Euro NCAP also rated it pretty good. They also are really fun to drive, but i don´t need to tell you, since you have one already.

[@EwenorKvM]

In Germany trailers are designed differently. A crash there is similar to a crash with a normal vehicle.

[@erraldstyler]

@@EwenorKvM Hope you never get to find out by yourself

[@krokodil191]

China is not joking. What China achieved in last 30 years is more than amazing.

[@DCARSTUDIO]

Appreciate！I believe that China would achieve more in the future.

[@syauqy17]

Ok. After comparing them, I decided to buy the truck

[@hyrenaj2888]

The Maybach/S class B pillar survived because it was so long the front crash structure struck the rear wheels of the trailer before the B-pillar could come into contact with the trailer (which in the real world may be a factor, but is not indicative of the strength of the B-pillar).

[@omostim2385]

The front half of the Maybach is the same length as a regular S class. They could’ve saved money and bought one and got the same results

[@martinsv9183]

All cars hit those wheels before B pillar.

[@jgueroz71]

IHS has some strong competition. Wow this channel did amazing work! 10/10 quality video

[@drwasabie1]

this is the most successfull crash test on the internet ever.

[@jondevansky186]

Thanks for this, and adding english subtitles. This was really cool.

[@Xiaotian_Wu]

虽然我认为这次测试对suv很吃亏，但是这测试还是非常有意义的。

[@silentthunderbird3390]

对，车矮的反而躲开了大车的货箱撞击，等于是向下挤压了

[@lionheart3025]

We should note that the support rigidity on both sides of the truck's rear anti-collision beam is obviously insufficient. When it collides with the vehicle behind it, it breaks directly without absorbing enough impact kinetic energy. As a result, the rear A-pillar was inserted directly into the truck chassis. The engine compartment of the rear car was not fully folded to absorb the impact energy. So truck rear bumper regulations must be changed.

[@coriallink]

AGREE

[@DCARSTUDIO]

probable yes

[@reskeee]

well, that's the reality for people outside the US. underride safety is not strict in some Asian countries (China, Indonesia, Malaysia, etc) unlike in the US which is really strict, its pretty common sight of trucks or trailers that dont have an underride guard at all.

[@hyrenaj2888]

IIHS did a demonstration on this a long time ago but I don't think there was a government mandate, so many trailers may still have this sort of rear crash guard.

[@reskeee]

@@hyrenaj2888 Since IIHS test bunch of underride guards, the trailer manufacturer make the guard stronger so it passed IIHS test. IIHS publicly shared the result so the manufacturer can feel ashamed about the results and yes they did feel ashamed so they made the guard stronger. But here in asia, none of those happen. If you rear end a trailer in the US, i think you will have a chance to survive, but in here you will hit straight to heaven 😶

[@guilhermelins6082]

That's amazing. Truly one of the best (if not THE best) crash tests ever taken

[@stingerBTW]

Bro the Tesla Model 3 held up way better than I expected wow. 😶

[@erraldstyler]

Euro NCAP also rated the Model 3 very good in the "classic" way of testing. It´s actually a really good car, no matter how hard people hate on them.

[@zykotec]

It seems the conclusion of this test is that if big trucks and passenger cars have to share the same roads a redesign or reinforcement of the rear crash structure on large trucks to work with passengers cars would be easier than to redesign all passenger cars?

[@DCARSTUDIO]

It probably be correct

[@trumpxu5906]

@@DCARSTUDIO哈哈哈看的出来还是中国人回复的评论， 真的很希望你们可以在外网创出一片天， 如果是能够在有英语字幕的基础上加入英语配音应该会让更多的观众愿意看完。 这种事情找口语好点的留学生或者AI都可以做到的。 还有油管西班牙语的市场也很大， 可是适度的考虑一下

[@older12000]

Perhaps a curved structure to deflect cars away from the truck

[@TANOCA17]

@@older12000or may be a rearward protruding energy absorbing bumper which will give space and energy absorption before A pillar hits to rigid corner of the truck

[@ArK047]

​@@TANOCA17 commercial vehicles, even some containers, may need to back up to a dock to unload. This means that the back must be vertically flat and cannot have any reactive features of their own.

[@user125username]

Good job guys! Best crash test that ive seen! Will you do more crash tests with cars like Lexus, Toyota Land Cruiser 200 or Prado, Acura, Audi and etc? Your test are best and all information are given.

[@刘老汉-w9l]

你说的这些车都该进博物馆了，所以，不。

[@coligon4828]

Xiaomi su7 did quite well for a new car company

[@greenearth9945]

That one surprised me the most. I knew Tesla would win because they have been good at structural strength for years but to see a new car company performing that well in remarkable

[@thescfiles1273]

International viewer here - probably the most real world style of crash is this - going full speed into a truck at night ..never expected some of these models to fail like this

[@EwenorKvM]

If you’re in the EU or US, these results do not apply. Trucks & trailers are designed there to avoid such fatal results, even motorcyclists profit from it.

[@f1ndGeo.]

This video is excellent, the testing facility looks amazing too

[@DCARSTUDIO]

thanks for your liking. follow us and get more

[@fonming]

這個測試演示出路上會遭遇到的真實狀況, 必須給推. 當瑞典在1970年代可因當地路況推出麋鹿測試時, 2020年代為什麼不能因應城際間交通運輸需求而做出卡車後方追撞試驗, 讓汽車製造商能更有精進的空間呢？

[@kuro_5537]

因為要改的應該是大貨車的防撞梁 而不是靠小車的A柱去扛 以前美國iihs也有做過相關試驗 可以去查查看 以結果來看也幫助美國卡車的防撞梁有更好的設計

[@mso8190]

Very valuable test. Hopefully, manufacturers will improve their products for this type of crash.

[@DCARSTUDIO]

hope so

[@EwenorKvM]

They already did - 30 years ago trucks & trailers have been slightly modified to avoid such fatal crashes. Very important for motorcyclists, too 👍🏻

[@bestusername2010]

What a test! Thank you guys for your superb job! Keep it on!

[@AIRDRAC]

Part of why Volvo performed so well, is also that Volvo (and Saab) historically always have had extra strong A-pillars, due the the rather high risk of hitting a moose/elk in Sweden, where they are made, which has so long legs that the center of mass of the animal would impact directly on the A-pillar.

[@Irwinwong-s7s]

Thank you for making such an incredible test

[@tonicgin2087]

The most economical solution is to introduce and enforce a better engineered add-on rear structure on trucks. While newer cars with standard radar-detected automatic emergency braking systems should avoid this kind of accidents, you can't expect everyone to buy better/newer cars.

[@mikeattheimagebusiness6215]

Really valuable work which I hope that manufactures and legislators will act on. Please keep up this campaign and make all of the data accessible. Thank you.

[@jensabi]

I find it very nice and efficient from the car crash company and you guys that you respect every car brand aswell as you see them all in a neutral perspective. 🎉

[@NayaA-Ri]

Spektakuler.. best video i ever watch. Respect from Indonesia

[@reetangovindji6009]

You've done an amazing job with this video! The dedication to providing us with such detailed and informative content is truly commendable. Keep up the fantastic work, it's clear that a lot of time, effort, and money goes into making your channel so educational and entertaining.

[@DCARSTUDIO]

Thank you for your follow and likes, we will have more test videos in the future

[@PatrikPakard]

I had pain in my stomach during the entire video. I couldn't stop to think about someone I know in place the passager 😢. Thank you for this video. A verg expensive video😮

[@ohaeng]

Don't block KZbin's Automatic Captions feature.

[@dy7296]

Euro Ncap tests as far as I can watch focuses more on safety features and the structural test only goes up to the bumper and side crash. This Truck test is the *real* testament of car structural safety.

[@Orbly]

Massive respect, great job. Subscribed and thank you.

[@DCARSTUDIO]

Thanks a lot

[@DjDziQ]

Amazing job!!! Ohh, it would be so cool to see XC60 or XC90 in this test!

[@user-w29vfwh59vd]

The Range Rover's passenger airbag flying out of the cabin was both comical and SHOCKING!!

[@irfanafrandi1290]

Thank you so much for performing this kind of crash test. So know we all know that, the most fragile part of car structure is in A-B pillar and front beam of the roof. When the pillars and beam collapses, it will directly hit our head and causing fatal death. That is really concerning. I think manufacturers must find a solution and do internal test like this immediately. This kind of test should be standard in the world.

[@thequestions3348]

This is..i think..the most spectacular crash test and i this is EXPENSIVE

[@silverground3670]

as a BeamNG Drive player I really enjoy this content

[@yzhang9265]

Thank you for your initiatives!

[@alexhuang3439]

这个视频太棒啦~~~~~~~~~~~ 继续加油~~~~

[@Timico1000]

I can only imagine how expensive these tests must have been. Who sponsors you?

[@BorisG491]

Chinese car insurance companies

[@Timico1000]

@BorisG491 Ah...okay, like the IIHS in the USA.

[@gseeker]

They are an independent automotive media company, backed by ByteDance (the company behind TikTok)

[@veronveron25]

Usa and Europe can't make this test 😂😂

[@pablopicaro7649]

@@veronveron25 They have similar test 'overlap' ' obique overlap' , but not against a Lorry Trailer

[@baufuku]

Thank you for performing these tests,

[@DCARSTUDIO]

😄

[@rishabhs14]

This is the most incredible crash test video I've every seen. Thank you so much for doing this - lots of love and respect from India 🙏 Any plans to do this on some of the newer cars that claim to have 2000mpa steel in their A pillars and improved crash performance esp: Zeekr 7x, Onvo L60, BYD Sealion 07, Tesla model Y and the new BMW 5 series?

[@Lav-v9c]

Man that Model 3 is built like a rock! Tesla as always does really well.

[@yusufcanaktas6929]

safest cars on the road

[@mothbreeder641]

@@yusufcanaktas6929 Not even close.

[@yusufcanaktas6929]

@mothbreeder641 can you name a few

[@xaviart4727]

@@yusufcanaktas6929 safest car 2024 is BYD Seal.

[@shung8028]

整個測試感覺已經不是在測試轎車了， 感覺都是在證明，卡車的後防護欄法規有問題， 後防護欄根本都沒有任何潰縮吸能作用，所有的力都是板台跟貨櫃在承受。

[@rickfeng4466]

希望下次两会将有人跟习提这件事~

[@why886]

@@rickfeng4466那小學生會理會這些事？想多了

[@kito1692]

习不管这个，这个是交通部的职责​@@rickfeng4466

[@cliff359]

@@why886 朋友，你家乡的大卡车后方有很多气囊是吗？

[@malagebide]

视频中卡车后杠是用的美规

[@joseamanceboh5448]

I was impressed by the Xiaomi SU7, as it is new to the company, it is a very safe and elegant car and one day I criticized its safety but now that I see it, it is safe.

[@ereinaldy20]

it is not passenger cars that must be developed to be safer, but the REAR of the truck must be FULL to the bottom, there should be no iron bars hanging behind the truck which can be a source of problems. I don't know what the government and TRUCK and trailer developers are thinking. Why not make a regulation so that the rear of the truck must be full to the bottom so that it is safe for other drivers.

[@martinsv9183]

A pillar should hold up much better. They can do it in rally cars so why not here.

[@nopblox]

If they lower the trailer they also have to lower the truck so the truck can tow it.But the problem is that if they lower everything the truck has to be smaller and the wheels too.If the truck is small it has less power but since it also has smaller tyres it has less grip

[@chasefrompawpatrol5291]

Chińczycy! Jesteście najlepsi. Lepszych testów na zderzenia nie widziałem. Europejskie ncap to jest żart.

[@wody21]

Wow, the (video) production quality is Epic! Unbeliveable content, max respect! Keep up the great work.

[@raulignaciohdz.7189]

This is what the auto industry needs. Usually i tend to hate on the Chinese automotive industry due to their poorly designed and built cars. But this is just next level. This should be a standard test for all cars. Congratulations

[@Ilovetoes6996]

They’re definitely improving and very impressive considering how they already almost leveled themselves with brands of other countries that’s been around for much longer

[@stayzleeeeee]

你对中国汽车工业的认知太落伍了

[@ilkeryoldas]

Actual real life scenario test, well done!

[@GTI_CHHA]

Thanks for your immens efforts!! The amount of preparation works is insane. Probably a few months of work. The main conclusion is clear, very few cars can withstand such rear-ending of a truck. It will make manufacturers have to improve crash absorption and A-pillar designs...

[@DCARSTUDIO]

This test took nearly a year from preparation to completio. But we are very happy to receive everyone's like

[@StormChaserAlgeria]

0:50 what an Editing 🤯

[@Wasmachineman]

Why am I not surprised the S60 scores so well even in this absolutely horrific scenario?

[@appyhippy6048]

Great video and kudos on the effort.both the tests and the video production !! Given most new cars have AEB , how’s that factored into the test ? Do you turn it off ? Maybe AEB systems mean structures can be made lighter and as a consequence weaker ..as they are not expecting to run into the back of a truck like this ? Or at the very least not without a level of braking and all safety systems at high alert ?

[@antimatter4733]

This is a side effect of manufacturers designing cars to excel in very specific crash tests while not considering the wide variety of other forces a vehicle can encounter. So many of these vehicles have extremely thin A-pillars because that simply is never tested in standard tests. On the other hand it seems like these rear crash bars on trucks need significant improvements. There's so much space and weight that can be used to create a much safer crumple zone and dissipate energy

[@ccheng6477]

新鮮， 有趣，知識性齊集一身，感謝出品人下血本

[@harrisonhealey1679]

I’m so glad these tests are being carried out. Thank you for highlighting 🙏

[@palakbapakmu8014]

I will never expect would end up in this Chinese car crash video, anyway this is awesome i don't think ncap would even make this kind of video great work my man 😂🙏

[@fynnoderso001]

Amazing production and good precision in terms of crashing these cars. Best regards from Germany.

[@Turgineer]

So many different cars! Great test.

[@DCARSTUDIO]

Thanks for like

[@photonics1]

high budget test, good production!

[@theclifbar]

Brilliant test, I hope you can continue to innovate in safety testing (highway speed crashes like 120 km/h would be very interesting because most of our miles are driven at highway speed). Can you also test the Tesla Model Y (best selling car in the world in 2023) and the Toyota RAV4 and Corolla (former best selling vehicle) against the 40-ton truck?

[@DCARSTUDIO]

good opinion

[@EwenorKvM]

If you’re in the EU or US, these results do not apply. Trucks & trailers are designed there to avoid such fatal results, even motorcyclists profit from it.

[@CycOp]

FYI, the vehicle tested on 27:24 is a VW Tiguan L base model (L probably dented elongated version available only in China), on 27:34 is a Nissan Qashqai (similar to Rogue or X-trail), on 28:19 Honda CR-V, on 33:13 Toyota RAV4, on 33:14, Buick GL8(not available in the US), 33:23, Lexus ES, 37:12 Volvo S60. In the summary, those in the “Good” category (39:31) include Tesla Model 3, Xiaomi SU7, Volvo S60 and Hyundai Elantra. in “average” category (40:48) , notable include M-B G class, VW Tiguan L, Toyota RAV4, Maybach S, Lexus ES, BMW X5, M-B GLC, Buick GL8 and Honda CR-V. In the “poor” category, notables include Land Rover and Nissan Qashqai.

[@4stroke4wheels4life8]

Give a medal to the editor

[@FEGTTTSDH]

Excellent test, but here you can see cars with low height are the most effective (to avoid the truck bed) they hit the wheel with the chassis and not soo much the A-pilar and the highest (the worst) But leaving aside the whole test, how the hell do they allow these dangerous trucks to be driven on the road? I mean, they should create a crash-resistant bumper, make them MANDATORY to prevent the car from crashing underneath.

[@DCARSTUDIO]

Yes, that is the most people commented below our videos

[@colintang3910]

Wow, I am impressed with these videos! you are raising the bar like the IIHS did back in the day

[@EwenorKvM]

If you’re in the EU or US, these results do not apply. Trucks & trailers are designed there to avoid such fatal results, even motorcyclists profit from it.

[@jorgeeduardoabrilrodriguez9026]

Es tal vez la mejor prueba real que he visto. Gracias

[@christophedecavalla2941]

The single biggest flaw in design and regulation is the design of the bar in the back of trucks. If a one piece flat metal plate was used instead, it would save many lives.

[@johnchang3807]

One of the most expensive car crash test that only the chinese can afford to do it , amazing !!

[@Ansh_Rajpoot_]

NICE YOU GUYS ARE WORKING ON IT.. THE CAR MANUFACTURER ARE PROVIDING THIN ALLUMINIUM EVERYWHERE.. THE A PILLAR SHOULD BE THE HARDEST. OR MAY BE SOLID STEEL...

[@tristanwil8677]

Extremely impressive content, thank you.

[@rmsys18]

And this is why emergency break assist is now common to new vehicles, the car will determine to break in the unsafe distance from a truck cutting/taking your lane in a highway or street

[@MaximusFLF]

I agree that the vehicles should be made stronger, but the traliers should also be made stronger, so both safety additions will be able to work together.

[@finnurth]

Brilliant production! Congratulations!

[@FreestylerAlbert]

So the problem is not with the cars, the problem is with the "Rear Underride" protection on the trucks. Should be more up to date, and handle more "force". The current law is: 50 kN (kilonewtons) of force applied at two symmetrical points no more than 300 mm from the centerline. 100 kN applied at points closer to the ends of the guard (outermost 300 mm of the width).

[@paulogomes8762]

Merci pour ce travail énorme ! J'ai la confirmation que d'avoir deux model 3 comme voiture à la maison me donne un maximum de chance en cas d'accident. bonjour de France !

[@DCARSTUDIO]

wow！Thats a real case to support that Model 3 is truly safe

[@kaaka-z9y]

@@DCARSTUDIO终于有英文字幕了.. 想要粉丝和流量建议配音也做多国语言支持

[@xiaoteam575]

​@@kaaka-z9y 这位是法语 😂

[@kaaka-z9y]

@@xiaoteam575 没明白你想说什么

[@sunsstorm]

Guys I think to enhance road safety, it is crucial to focus on improving the rear (sides and front as well ) crash-absorbing structure of trucks. Not sure what are the differences between EU and Chinese standards, but this needs improvements worldwide, especially US. Currently, when this structure fails, the pillar often comes into contact with the trailer’s supporting beam, which typically has a steel thickness of 4-10 mm. This interaction highlights a fundamental issue: the A-pillar must be designed with a strength comparable to or greater than that of the trailer beam to effectively withstand such impacts. However, even if the A-pillar remains intact, passengers may still face fatal injuries due to the excessive G-forces generated during rapid deceleration. It’s important to remember that it is not speed itself that causes fatalities, but rather the sudden deceleration!!! Other thing is it would be very difficult to built a lightweight and slimline (A pillar shouldn’t obstruct visibility) structure similar in strength to solid steel.

[@zakzwijn8410]

This was one of the most expensive crash tests in history O_o

[@YavorDimitroff]

Wow! Great content!

[@divinvarghese3501]

Really impressive! makes one rethink when buying and driving a car.

[@DCARSTUDIO]

yep! We want help the consumers

[@alvatroniano]

Exelente test desde chile espectacular realmente

[@reskeee]

dang, how you guys can have a LOT of those car ranging from dirt cheap to freaking expensive for this crash test

[@JimLiu-sq4dy]

這家汽車媒體由tiktok全資擁有

[@reskeee]

@JimLiu-sq4dy ah, i see that's why they got money

[@InterestingFactsMadeByAi]

Damn, a lot of moneys were wasted for our safety. Respect for that.

[@Abhi-now]

Top notch production quality

[@shung8028]

24:30 奔馳G成績能好，是因為車身高， 前面的所有車輛連劍尾都沒有參與到吸能，A柱就已經撞上板台了， 而大G因為車身高，劍尾有先撞上板台開始吸能，才能倖免， 車頭如果低一些，如急踩剎車，車頭下沉的情況， 絕對跟前面的結果一樣。