Does Islam Allow the Exploitation of Female Prisoners of War? 'Sexual Slavery' Answered

Is so-called 'sexual slavery' permitted in Islam? NO, says Anne-Marie, who explains the Quran's REAL teachings on female prisoners of war. She shows how sexual assault and ill-treatment of prisoners was not allowed, and how such prisoners were either released or could earn their freedom.
No other religion has such humane and beneficial teachings on this difficult subject, and the World could have benefitted from them after WW2.
Check out Anne-Marie's other videos on Rational Religion: • Spotlight - Anne-Marie...
Join our telegram group: t.me/rationalreligion
---------------------------------------
Rational Religion: Making Sense of Spirituality
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA:
/ rranswers​​
/ rranswers​​
/ rationalreligion​​
www.rationalreligion.co.uk​​
You can get in touch at [e-mail] or by tweeting us @RRanswers.
Learn more about Islam Ahmadiyya, the peaceful religious philosophy of the Rational Religion team, here:
Intro & Beliefs: rationalreligion.co.uk/messian....
And don't forget to SUBSCRIBE below, and SHARE THIS VIDEO!

[@a.k.7341]

Sexual harm/rape of ANY human being is ALWAYS evil, in all circumstances. So these vulnerable women needed protection. Sexual activity must NEVER be coerced.

[@minnowa9117]

These "vulnerable women" (and men) were involved in warfare, sometimes as fighters themselves. And as a consequence, they were taken as prisoners of war (NOT slaves). And yet Islam guaranteed that they be looked after and not abused. What other culture in the past granted good treatment to those who fought against them? (Answer = none)

[@yaelthesnail]

Not going to mention the Arab slave trade in sub-Saharan Africa, which lasted centuries longer than the trans-Atlantic one? These slaves were not captured in a defensive war. They were captured in raids, or purchased from other Africans, and subjected to horrific conditions.

[@faithfulservant4618]

Is that what islam teaches? The burden of crime fall to the criminal, not the law

[@okay4608]

@harishkumar india Where did you get this information from?????

[@yaelthesnail]

@@faithfulservant4618 It was permitted to continue for 1400 years in every part of the Islamic world, so obviously it wasn't against Islam.

[@okay4608]

@Wasim Ahmed Where is the proof, I have read on The Prophets Muhammad's life and no where to find such incident or mention of a wife, moreover from reading his life it goes against his character to do such a thing.

[@sulaimansayyed5269]

before Islam not after!

[@imransiddique8794]

Women defending Islam is true like, Chicken defending KFC. 😂

[@egyptian_empire]

Women rights in islam are like christianity but some are different ChatGPT In Islam, women's rights are also influenced by interpretations of Islamic teachings, cultural practices, and historical contexts. Here are some key points regarding women's rights in Islam: Equality in Spiritual and Moral Status: Islam teaches that men and women are equal in their spiritual and moral responsibilities before God. Both are considered equally accountable for their actions and both can achieve salvation through faith and righteous deeds. Legal Rights: Islamic law, known as Shariah, grants women various legal rights, including the right to inherit property, the right to work and earn money, the right to education, and the right to choose a spouse. These rights are outlined in the Quran and elaborated upon in the Hadith (sayings and actions of Prophet Muhammad). Modesty and Dress: Islam promotes modesty for both men and women, with specific guidelines for dress (such as the hijab for women) aimed at promoting dignity and respect. Marriage and Family: Islam emphasizes the importance of mutual respect, love, and cooperation between spouses. Men are responsible for providing for their families, while women have the right to financial support from their husbands. Divorce is permitted but discouraged, and women have rights regarding divorce proceedings and custody of children. Historical Context: Throughout Islamic history, women have held significant roles as scholars, teachers, leaders, and contributors to various fields. The status and rights of women have varied across different cultures and time periods, influenced by local customs and interpretations of Islamic teachings. Contemporary Issues: Modern interpretations and practices regarding women's rights within Islam vary widely. Some Muslim-majority countries have laws that restrict women's rights, while others have made efforts to promote gender equality and women's empowerment within the framework of Islamic teachings.

[@hakeemmammel]

If something is wrong with the video, explain it. Instead of resorting to slandering

[@egyptian_empire]

@@hakeemmammel he just got brainwashed by his media, if you took a look of the origins of america he will be the biggest terrorist in usa and he will ruin it

[@zehadashu]

hello sister, if muslim loss in the battle and other religion soldiers doing the same thing with you, after that what will you say......will it be right?

[@andin3720]

Well if muslims do it to others, why others shouldn’t do the same to muslims.

[@hbknowledgedose6972]

Yep

[@user-rl2qq4ey2z]

Why does the Quran not explicitly abolish slavery, similar to how it prohibited the consumption of pork and wine?

[@irfanibrahim947]

What i understand is Now there is no slavery in world But that doesn’t vouch, slavery will again come to this world . If slavery is back again Islam has set of rules for that.

[@abrarahmad-mw4dk]

Islam tried to dissolve the difference between the master and a slave If every slave were suddenly released and left without a master, food and shelter, something like communist revolution might have happened

[@bmz2109]

owning another human being as property is outright immoral regardless how well the slave is treated. It diminishes the dignity and worth of a human being to an inanimate object. Slavery can never be justified under any circumstance, not now and not even back then.

[@yassermaftouh8940]

They're not treated as property

[@yassermaftouh8940]

Also,you got it backwards, believe in God first then ask yourself,do you think you know better than God?leave emotion out of this because reality is different

[@takiyaazrin7562]

@@yassermaftouh8940 We captured excellent women for ransom. We decided to have sex with them but by observing 'azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). We asked Allah's Messenger (ﷺ), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. Sahih Muslim 1438a

[@kamranraza5196]

in the name of Allah keeping slave is forbidden in islam but can keep only when the war happened u can do for thing with your captive 1.you can free him for the sake of Allah 2.you can ask for compensation 3.you can trade them for muslim prisoner 4.you can keep them as servant for your benefit The Prophet said, "Whoever frees a Muslim slave, Allah will save all the parts of his body from the (Hell) Fire as he has freed the body-parts of the slave." Said bin Marjana said that he narrated that Hadith to 'Ali bin Al-Husain and he freed his slave for whom 'Abdullah bin Ja'far had offered him ten thousand Dirhams or one-thousand Dinars. The Quran calls for the freeing of slaves, either the owner manumitting the slave, or a third party purchasing and freeing the slave. The freeing of slaves is encouraged is an act of benevolence, and expiation of sins. Quran 24:33 devises a manumission contract in which slaves buy their freedom in installments

[@zehadashu]

@@yassermaftouh8940 if muslim loss in the battle and other religion soldiers doing the same thing with muslim womens' after that what will you say......will it be right?

[@saqibsheikh2790]

The slaves were distributed to different households? You mean they were sold in slave markets. The conditions of which you didnt discuss in the video for obvious reasons.

[@Coriolanus89]

No they weren't sold. They were DISTRIBUTED TO DIFFERENT HOUSEHOLDS. Not sure what you don't get about that. They were POWs and could not be bought / sold by anyone.

[@Coriolanus89]

@Greg Kanowitz they weren't slaves. They were POWs. Hence had to be released at the end of the war. Didn't you watch the video?

[@Mo74mmad]

@Greg Kanowitz the west is in constant decline so what makes you think we give a shit what y’all think of Islam? It’s been hated and propagandized against by the Europeans since it’s conception so what else is new?

[@Mo74mmad]

@harishkumar india I’m not gonna deny basic history. The mistakes of Muslims don’t deter the perfection of Islam.

[@Mo74mmad]

@harishkumar india definitely not

[@kidsworld2973]

Very beautifully explained❤❤jazakallah

[@anikanalohamin1077]

Best video on a very delicate subject

[@minimo5281]

6:23 How can they be collected up by family or friend if the family or friend has just been murdered?

[@prawnfishh]

its possible that not all family participated in wat

[@amipertiwisuwito2125]

Correction: when ths video mentioned Al-Quran Chapter 8 verse 68, it was supposed to be verse 67. Again when this video mentioned Al-Quran Chapter 47 verse 5, it was supposed to be verse 4

[@RationalReligion]

The references are from a Quran that enumerates Bismillah as the first verse. This is the correct enumeration, as per ahadith. Most modern Qurans are wrong in their numbering. JazakAllah.

[@alurusandeep8506]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/mKe1Y3ltiMujn6s

[@JohnDoe-pw9tr]

Are they held against their will yes or no? All good and well explaining how wonderful you treat them.

[@Coriolanus89]

No. Because they were given freedom to leave under the mukatabat with employment conditions.

[@thornados4969]

@@Coriolanus89 O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowries, and those whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war, and the daughters of thine uncle on the father's side and the daughters of thine aunts on the father's side, and the daughters of thine uncle on the mother's side and the daughters of thine aunts on the mother's side who emigrated with thee, and a believing woman if she give herself unto the Prophet and the Prophet desire to ask her in marriage - a privilege for thee only, not for the (rest of) believers - We are Aware of that which We enjoined upon them concerning their wives and those whom their right hands possess - that thou mayst be free from blame, for Allah is ever Forgiving, Merciful. Quran 33:50

[@Coriolanus89]

@@thornados4969 what's your point? This verse is just explaining which types of relationships are lawfully recognised in Islam. As explained in the video (did you watch it) such female prisoners of war had the right to leave their situation as POWs through the Mukatabat.

[@thornados4969]

@@Coriolanus89 The verse justifies criminal actions of Muhammad and jihadists to spare the women and girls as s3xu al slaves after their husbands and fathers were murdered. The properties of the victims are plundered as booty to Muhammad. "The ‘Spoils of War' Surah came down from Allah to His Prophet concerning the distribution of the booty when the Muslims showed their evil nature. Allah took it out of their hands and gave it to the Apostle. Ishaq:307

[@Coriolanus89]

@@thornados4969 yeah. The video corrected all these ahistorical BS assertions of yours. Try watching it G

[@abdulmejidmunewer3334]

Masha Allah, Thank you for the wonderful reasoning

[@Axnasss]

Best video I’ve seen on this sensitive and controversial topic with amazing clarification for every move with references.WE may hold negative opinions with our rational thinking but wisdom of Allah if far better than ours… Jazakillah khair

[@soufianechbani1922]

The mental gymnastics are truly Olympic.

[@davefordham14]

@@soufianechbani1922 Yep. If only people actually read what it says in the Quran rather than taking their parents' or uncles' word for it. Some of the verses are horrific. And yes, what it says about captive women who are non-Muslims is absolutely right. It's basically free for all.

[@cate_enthusiast]

thank you ❤

[@lukmanabdullah977]

Amazing ❤

[@bornbranded29]

What's the traditional, historical practice of concubinage in Islam?

[@hakeemmammel]

It's wrong

[@marc3dartist601]

The art of sugar coating...

[@believerinalmighty1641]

Can't beleive my eyes... A women trying to defend Qur'an when it's totally against women

[@abdulHaqqqq]

its not your the one confused

[@YourAashique]

What did France have done in Algeria is Good?

[@OptimisticCynic45]

If we agree that owning another human being is unethical and wrong, why did Mohammed not simply stop slavery if God was on his side? Stopping an evil such as slavery includes stop owning slaves yourself, stop having sex with them, and stop buying and selling them. A slave by definition, cannot consent or reject being made to have sex -they don’t own their own bodies. Would you agree to a non Muslim friend or colleague being made a slave ? And forced into sexual slavery?

[@VisualIslamTV]

You need both parties to agree to this rule, if other party takes your women and you don't do anything then you cannot win any war, Remember we are talking about war. how about killing people is it good ? that's what happened to people in war in both sides

[@fahadiit9144]

Have shame spreading lies

[@OptimisticCynic45]

@@fahadiit9144 So just a statement that it’s lies but no proof? The biggest slave traders this past 200 years were Arabs -do you know how many slaves were traded ? Up to 15 million people. And no, the slaves were not treated as human beings either.

[@hajrah5535]

⁠@@fahadiit9144why dont you reply with facts instead? :)

[@hybridrg2937]

did you not watch the video? 💀 this directly goes against what is described in the video.

[@movietower6095]

How can one prevent the rape of a slave Woman in the House of her Master?

[@adnansheikh6321]

Masha Allah great video but the part where 9:25 it says about rape of female prisoners of wars the verse displayed is correct but the number isn't. It is actually Chapter 4 and verse 24 nor chapter 24 and verse 34.

[@farazmubashercheema12]

Kya matlab iska jo kehte hain ke oraat ko bandhi bana sakte hain kya ye sach ha aur kin ortoon ko

[@alurusandeep8506]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/mKe1Y3ltiMujn6s

[@a.k.7341]

Sexual harm/rape of ANY human being is ALWAYS evil, in all circumstances. So these vulnerable women needed protection. Sexual activity must NEVER be coerced. God would never create something just to torture it

[@incognittooo]

You have given a completely different interpretation to quran 24:34. The most authentic tafsir ibn kathir says "do not force them into prostitution" because some of them had this practice of letting the slave girls for prostitution. That was only prohibited and not forcible sex with slave girls.

[@tahirnasser1915]

Actually the video explicitly states that the traditional meaning was a prohibition on prostitution, however, the arabic is the arabic and is also fully understandable as prohibiting rape.

[@incognittooo]

Capturing non-combatant civilian women against their wishes itself is grossly unethical. Upon that they are captured explicitly for the purpose of sex. My question is Which women would happily submit herself for sex as a slave after her husband or brother or father or son has been killed by the same people who captured her? Sex cannot happen between a slave and a master without force/coercing. You cannot romanticise a relation formed out of war and killing. It is not love that blossoms between them nor is it prostitution where there consent and no force involved. It is far worse than that because forcing invariably was there. It is pure common sense. Moreover A free woman has to cover herself with hijab to safeguard her dignity. A slave woman was prohibited from using hijab. A slave doesn't and should not have dignity? Why?? There are authentic sources which show People checked on their potential female slaves by pressing their breasts and other body parts on the pretext of verifying the quality of the commodity they are going to own. Now all these things were legal under sharia. If Pressing breasts of a woman by a number of buyers against her wishes is not rape then what is rape?

[@saleenakhan5792]

@@incognittooo can u plz tell me the authentic source of people pressing the breasts of slave women while buying

[@a.k.7341]

Sexual harm/rape of ANY human being is ALWAYS evil, in all circumstances. So these vulnerable women needed protection. Sexual activity must NEVER be coerced. If you are ok with women being abused, you are absolutely ok with this being done to your family as well

[@fahadiit9144]

​@@incognittooothose are never mentioned in any authentic scriptures you shameless mf

[@SeekTheTruthAndTruth]

*AMAZING AMAZING AMAZING* Thank You Sister!

[@ridafatima7152]

Jazaak Allah

[@ridafatima7152]

Satisfied

[@ang5798]

I will take this as a starting point of understanding slavery in islam. I will study this topic further and not just accept it as fact

[@026_arhmarehman8]

Thank you for this explanation, I am so convinced by the explanation . I was so stressed and sad when I got to knew this concept, I was devasted. But now I am relieved, May Allah reward you , Aameen.

[@thehararean]

Tippu Tip, real name Hamad bin Muhammad bin Juma bin Rajab el Murjebi was an Arab-Zanzibari plantation owner, governor and slave trader who sold tens of thousands of people into bondage in the Arabian peninsula and beyond. WHAT DEFENSIVE WAS WAS HE FIGHTING

[@sarahs1ddiqui]

You can say the Taliban and ISIS kill in the name of Islam but they do not represent the message of Islam. If you see a girl in a hijab that is drinking alcohol, will you then say that Islam allows the consumption of alcohol. Focus on God not the people.

[@egyptian_empire]

it was before islam :D

[@mdharoonrashid6791]

Sister please also explain the rule for selling the female slaves

[@egyptian_empire]

there it is from chatgpt Regulation and Treatment: Islam encouraged the humane treatment of slaves and emphasized their rights. Slaves were to be provided with food, clothing, and shelter in a manner consistent with the owner's own standard of living. Protections and Rights: Slaves had rights such as the right to be fed and clothed like their owners, the right to be treated with kindness, and the right to earn money and eventually buy their freedom through a contractual agreement (mukatabah). Marriage and Concubinage: Female slaves were not to be coerced into prostitution or exploited sexually without their consent. Islam allowed for the marriage of male owners with their female slaves (concubines), but this was regulated with certain rights and protections for the concubine. Encouragement of Manumission: Islam highly encouraged the freeing of slaves as a virtuous act, and many companions of the Prophet Muhammad and subsequent Muslims freed numerous slaves. Spirit of Abolition: While slavery was not abolished outright in Islamic law, the principles and values introduced by Islam laid the groundwork for eventual abolition movements within Muslim societies.

[@taymina_6505]

The first verses is chapter 8 verse 67

[@takiyaazrin7562]

We captured some of the women as prisoners, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to release sperms outside of the women (coitus interruptus). We asked Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) whether it was permissible. He said, "It is better for you to release sperms inside." Sahih al-Bukhari 2542

[@authur_fleck61.87]

is it possible for you to explain Sunan Abi Dawud vol 2 v2155 "Abu Sa’id Al Khudri said “The Apostle of Allaah(ﷺ) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of Apostle of Allaah (ﷺ) were reluctant to have relations with the female captives because of their pagan husbands. So, Allaah the exalted sent down the Qur’anic verse “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hand posses.” This is to say that they are lawful for them when they complete their waiting period." how does one comprehend this verse in the correct sense? Thank you

[@a..d2062]

We captured some of the women as prisoners, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to release sperms outside of the women. We asked Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) (whether it was permissible). He said, "It is better for you to release sperms inside. No soul, (that which Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come, into existence." Sahih al-Bukhari 2542

[@authur_fleck61.87]

@@a..d2062 that's the justification for stating that these men of God couldn't control their last and then used God to give them an excuse to rape women. God isn't this stupid character which your book makes him out to be. The stupid character is the man who wrote the book

[@tunafin8728]

09:25 , that means God will show mercy to you even if you force yourself on your slave Okay, how can God not punish someone for a crime like that?

[@hausiji7hausiji764]

Summary: "In Islam, slavery is an abomination EXCEPT.... " + "The Europeans did it tooo, so Slavery is basically ok".

[@Coriolanus89]

1. It is forbidden to make anyone a slave in Islam. 2. This video is about POWs. Not slaves.

[@Mo74mmad]

Crappy summary but ok

[@trajictempr8574]

@Wasim Ahmed But it's with consent and it's a contract in which the "slave" can but themselves freedom and the owner/master can't deny.

[@Herman47]

@@Coriolanus89 Read Quran 4:92, where the allah of the followers of the Muhammad provides a condition under which a slave is to be freed. Of course, if it was forbidden to make anyone a slave in Islam, then this verse would be unnecessary.

[@ammarkhalid874]

@@trajictempr8574 slavery and consent?!?!? Give me a break. I’m not justifying slavery but a more rational explanation would be that slavery, concubines, and apostate killing was the norm back in the 7th century so it was considered acceptable. That leads to the real question, is the Quran, sunnah, and the Hadith even applicable in the 21st century when human civilization and culture is so vastly different? I think not!

[@JFearH_Ehhy]

Thank You sister. You cleared my misunderstanding.

[@takiyaazrin7562]

We captured some of the women as prisoners, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to release sperms outside of the women. We asked Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) (whether it was permissible). He said, "It is better for you to release sperms inside. No soul, (that which Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come, into existence." Sahih al-Bukhari 2542

[@waltsantos5496]

No mention of the Arab Slave trade which lasted far longer than the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade... how convenient that little fact was omitted to paint Muslims/Islam in a better light. Also, interesting that in the video. the lady says that the Quran abolished Slavery but why is it practiced by Islam and Muslims until today? Specifically in Africa and in the Middle East?

[@noumansaghir6382]

Well, you see. Interest (Ribba) is also prohibited in Islam. Kingship is also prohibited in Islam. If the Muslims were so goody goody that they Acted upon Islam 100% then the Whole world would have converted to Islam long ago.

[@SohanDsouza]

I'm sorry, "female prisoners of war"? How many female combatants did Muslims encounter in battle?

[@SohanDsouza]

Also, why can't Muslim females have sex with male "prisoners of war", since we are all being nice and consensual?

[@l__Dark__l]

Bro. If you think only men were soldier in tribes, your history knowledge is shit.

[@abrarahmad-mw4dk]

The meccans often had female dancers or entertainers to keep the morale of their men

[@l__Dark__l]

@@abrarahmad-mw4dk Dancing and Music is forbiden in Islam. However if you mean the pagan Arabs they did a lot worse.

[@abrarahmad-mw4dk]

@@l__Dark__l I mean the jaahils

[@AftabKhan-tu3ou]

How can Allah command to have sex with female war prisoners؟؟؟ How can Allah be so biased on this particular issue as dictated in sahi hadith 3432, chapter 7-8.

[@iJagraho]

POW were not allowed to be made slaves.if all the incidents of the Prophet’s times regarding prisoners of war are studied, it can be safely concluded that no new slaves were allowed to be made even in a war. This is according to the directive of Surah Muhammad. Most hadiths about slaves are about slaves who were already slaves.

[@TheSonOfGodWorshipsTheFather]

Vengeance belongs to who?

[@lifechoices6643]

When Allah's name is Al Raheem, then how can he sanction slavery

[@kiribertiefandango9807]

Short and correct answer - YES.

[@egyptian_empire]

you just wanna look like you are cool and such, go read a book and talk man stop watching hollywood

[@Thundawich]

What is the point of the contract if after the war ends the prisoners get to just leave?

[@Coriolanus89]

The war went on for 8 years.

[@nh4811]

@@Coriolanus89 so?

[@lunalovegood3249]

@@nh4811 Islam actually says when you kill a solider you fight the responsibility of the solider's family falls on the you

[@takiyaazrin7562]

@@lunalovegood3249 We captured excellent women for ransom. We decided to have sex with them but by observing 'azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). We asked Allah's Messenger (ﷺ), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. Sahih Muslim 1438a

[@a.k.7341]

Sexual harm/rape of ANY human being is ALWAYS evil, in all circumstances. So these vulnerable women needed protection. Sexual activity must NEVER be coerced. If you are ok with women being abused, you are absolutely ok with this being done to your family as well. What this woman says is GOOD

[@maur_sault750]

wow the cognitive dissonance and downright lies and logical fallacies from this woman is disgusting.

[@a..d2062]

We captured some of the women as prisoners, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to release sperms outside of the women. We asked Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) (whether it was permissible). He said, "It is better for you to release sperms inside. No soul, (that which Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come, into existence." Sahih al-Bukhari 2542

[@-abdulbari2904]

​@@a..d2062lmao why you lying my guy! Why did you misquote the hadith😂😂😂😂

[@longjunior7638]

I challenge u to point one!

[@movietower6095]

Never be struck or hidden? Them there is No slavery at all. Every captive would just walk away and no Muslim could hold him/ her. I don’t get it. Is this realistic? Please, I Need an answer.

[@soufianechbani1922]

Also I don't see the logical step between taking war captives to "take good care" of them in a moral impulse and having the full God given right to constantly raping them at will, would you imagine yourself as the traumatized captive and please reconsider your position.

[@marcostation1000]

comparing mohaned crimes with those comited by normal people 1400 years later is not a argument.

[@amipertiwisuwito2125]

Again Al-Quran Chapter 24 verse 34 was supposed to be verse 33

[@alurusandeep8506]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/mKe1Y3ltiMujn6s

[@takiyaazrin7562]

We captured excellent women for ransom. We decided to have sex with them but by observing 'azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). We asked Allah's Messenger (ﷺ), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. Sahih Muslim 1438a

[@marion34999]

If a slave women become muslim wouldn't it be a sin for her to not give consent to let his master have sex with her as a slave have to obey his master till he doesn't order to do anything that is haram? She doesn't even certainly get to choose her master to make her sexual partner like a woman do before marriage. So even if she doesn't like him, dislike to even think of having sex with her master she have to sleep with him if she doesn't want to do sin by not obeying her master? Not every slave become entitled to get mukataba... or maybe no slave is entitled to - according to scholars. So, at least there can be slave who cannot liberate himself from slavery, what if a sex slave become one of them? Who have to obey her master to sleep with him.. Even if she dislike him, doesn't want to have sex, doesn't want children, doesn't want the hazard of pregnancy and laboring a child.. Islam doesn't allow making slaves by kidnapping but only from those who involved in war ( like - soldiers, someone who nurses the wounded soldiers in war ) but allows buying slave who was made slave by kidnapping, and sex is allowed with this kind of slave women too (E.g. made slave by attacking a tribe and then kiddnapping the people from that tribe and making them slave, whether the attackers were Muslim or Non-muslim they can be bought by muslim; by buying slaves from non-muslim countries and selling them to muslim people and slave markets in muslim countries; buying from sex trafficker who did the same thing - kidnapping, sheikh Syed Abdullah Tariq mentioned this kind of slavery when he gave his lectures about sexual slavery when he was explaining how all the interpretation to support sexual slavery is so absurd while this kind of slavery is still there. but if this is true the reliability of hadith is at question to me) __________________ Those who say, “Allah is the Messiah, son of Mary,” *have certainly fallen into disbelief* . The Messiah ˹himself˺ said, “O Children of Israel! Worship Allah-my Lord and your Lord.” Whoever associates others with Allah ˹in worship˺ will surely be forbidden Paradise by Allah. Their home will be the Fire. And the wrongdoers will have no helpers. ( Quran, 5:72 ) Kafara = disbelieved corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=5&verse=72 By this verse, those who just say “Allah is the Messiah, son of Mary” becomes kafir! Not that 'those who says __ , __ even after reading and understanding the Quran to be true' as indicated in some other verses of the Quran. But this verse indicates whether someone know about Islam or not becomes kafir by saying that and he will be in hell forever. __________________ ↓This is a copy of someone's comment from another video. I think the problem is these men are thinking of a Hollywood depiction of rape, a woman being held down and screaming. There is a Hollywood depiction or rape that is more accurate and in accordance with the Muslim raping of slaves; The Handmaids Tale. There is no screaming or fighting, but those women do not say no because they fear punishment. A slave woman who runs away and gets captured is punished by the law. So she have no free association. Just like the women in the Handmaid's tale. Ways in which a woman can be punished for refusing to allow themselves to be penetrated without fighting, crying or screaming; A Muslim slave owner can sell them to an abusive person. A muslim slave own can sell their family or friends out of spite - breaking up their family and support network. So there are legal ways in which a slave can be punished, for not allowing themselves to be punished without a fight. When these women are laying back and letting the Muslim men do what they want, some Muslims seem to be rationalizing that as a ‘choice’ without thinking about the context in which that ‘choice’ is being made. They are slaves, they can't freely associate with their masters; they can't come and go as they please. If Muslim slaves aren't being raped, then neither are the women in The Handmaid's Tale - according to Muslim like the man in the video. They seem to be conflating ideals with reality. The spirit of the law is; treat them well, be nice, don't pressure or coerce them into sex, the letter of the law allows them to do just that. A slave is always under an implicit threat of negative consequences for refusing to do what their master wants. THEY ARE SLAVES.

[@wanderingstar5270]

You took the words out of my mouth! I cannot see how any of that can be called ethical or from a divine source.

[@shahfaisal8204]

Thank you.

[@theguyver4934]

One question what is reincarnation and is it real and if so what does islam say about it I'm really curious about it a lot these days sincerely from an ahmedi

[@shazil8771]

Bro the concept of reincarnation (rebirth) comes from Hinduism and Buddhism. In Islam death is explained as an event when your soul left your body. After your soul left your body it would not come again in this life but in life after death(Qiyyamah) "the life after death is something which we dont now how it really is"(Al-Quran). So there is no concept of reincarnation in Islam. (Sorry for my english~Ahmadi🇩🇪)

[@theguyver4934]

@@shazil8771 - One question are just saying that as a bias

[@shazil8771]

@@theguyver4934 @The guyver Do you ask me wether I am biased or you have further questions I did not get your point

[@theguyver4934]

@@shazil8771 - What I mean is are just saying reincarnation is not real because your a muslim

[@shazil8771]

@@theguyver4934 As you can see in my first comment I only wrote the islamic view on reincarnation. I did not say that reincarnation is illogical or unscientific. If you like here are some arguments which I have to support the islamic point of view. I am not an expert but I think I can try to explain it. 1. If reincarnation is true, then the population should not grow, but we have already problems with overpopulation. 2. We should not care (no feelings) about people who suffers because they are getting their punishment. We dont have to go to the hospital, we are just having karma from our previous life. Edit: (We can even stop Karma if we go to the hospital 😁) 3. If someone get punished for his previous life. In next life he must have live good and if live good life he will not punished again because he lived a good life. At this point no one should be punished because he lives a good life but knowadays the situation is getting worse and worse, there are people who suffering more and more. If reincarnation is true than this suffering must end. Again at the end this is just my point of view maybe you think differently.

[@thornados4969]

As application to islamic slavery, take the case of two girls enslaved by Muhammad after killing their husbands and fathers. Those girls were originally not slaves, in fact belonged to high ranking family of the non-muslim. After the killing, Muhammad made all girls as slave-girls automatically owned by him. In the quran, it is called right hand possess. The two slave-girls were released their status from slaves to wives of Muhammad, the condition to be free from slavery. From this sunnah, muslims can marry four free woman and his right hand posses (owned slave-girls). ".....right hand possesses whom Allah has given to you,) means, `the slave-girls whom you took from the war booty are also permitted to you.' He owned Safiyyah and Juwayriyah, then he manumitted them and married them, and he owned Rayhanah bint Sham`un An-Nadariyyah and Mariyah Al-Qibtiyyah, the mother of his son Ibrahim, upon him be peace; they were both among the prisoners, may Allah be pleased with them."

[@misterbk1791]

That is extempore false you can’t kill a father and take his daughters as slaves at all islamically

[@tahirnasser1915]

Had you watched the video, you'd realise it refutes each of your points. Here's the refutation AGAIN: 1. They were prisoners of war. Not slaves. As explained in the video - the POW status automatically stopped anyway at the end of the war. 2. The women were freed and then their hand in marriage offered. Reyhana is quoted IN THE VIDEO ITSELF as an example of a woman who was freed from being a POW by the Prophet (sa) and who rejected his hand in marriage, but he let her go free. 3. He never owned Juwairiyyah (ra). That also is in the video. She was a POW given to Thabit bin Qais (ra) who manumitted her through the Mukatabah system. 4. Mariyah Qibtiyyah was never owned by him. Again, nonsense. She was an Egyptian heiress sent as a wife to him from Muqauqis. She was never a POW and never "among the prisoners" because the Muslims were never at war with Muqauqis. Your Copy-Paste hatchet job really exposes your total lack of knowledge.

[@thornados4969]

@@tahirnasser1915 The hadith clearly stated Muhammad enslaved and owned young girls after killing their husbands and fathers. Brutal. quranx.com/Hadith/Bukhari/USC-MSA/Volume-2/Book-14/Hadith-68/

[@thornados4969]

@Can a swallow swallow? Are you trying to say that the authentic hadith I posted is wrong ? And you want to put another site with lies.It is haram to change MUhammad's saying in authenic hadith.

[@Herman47]

@@tahirnasser1915 If someone sent you to be the spouse of another, would you go become the spouse of a stranger?

[@MaiGodi]

Why talk about Europe. Europe didn’t say it’s the perfect human ever existed. And Europe was not spitting verbatim words of a God. Europe are just regular humans. Why compare apple and oranges

[@takiyaazrin7562]

We captured some of the women as prisoners, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to release sperms outside of the women. We asked Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) (whether it was permissible). He said, "It is better for you to release sperms inside. No soul, (that which Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come, into existence." Sahih al-Bukhari 2542

[@marion34999]

Maybe sexual slavery isn't permissible in Islam kzbin.info/www/bejne/npyke51prK-fqMU

[@a.k.7341]

Sexual harm/rape of ANY human being is ALWAYS evil, in all circumstances. So these vulnerable women needed protection. Sexual activity must NEVER be coerced. If you are ok with women being abused, you are absolutely ok with this being done to your family as well. Don't fall into that evil trap. This woman is correct

[@marion34999]

If it is permissible for men because there can be high chances of fornication in such situation if it isn't permissible then doesn't the same chances is there when a female have a male slave? Here too both are male and female.. so in such cases do Allah only have mercy for the children of muslim men who are born by his slave that he legalized such relationship so that those children can live normally in society but not the same mercy to the children who are born in such cases to muslim women? Even though most mother can fully take care of her children on her own even if some may need the support of family/society/gevernment as this kind of support system is given in Islam for any woman so that she doesn't need to work, this facility could have been given to such women too yet a separate rule for them..? Is it more important that all children have equal, right treatment or is it more important that although most women can take responsibility of them and their children but to ensure that all women and their children have a male guardian so that she don't need to work throw her children born out of wedlock at more disadvantage, or is it more right that for both men and women it should be haram and if there are children born to ayone out of wedlock their children should be the responsibility of the family or society or government? (most of the muslin don't do fornication because it's haram, right? There are many people, families who are living with their male or female servants under same roofs are they all committing zina..? Or is it haram for them to live under one roof...?) Although this explanation has also been given 23:6 and 23:7 ayahs of Quran refer to both men and women because 'azwaaj'(spouse) and 'ma malakat aymanukum'(right hand possess) refers to both male and female (23:6) even ma malakat aymanukum can be children, so pedophilia in anyway is halal in Islam? And 'whoever' can also be male and female (in 23:7) ('man' also refer to both men and women in Quran if the ayah doesn't state it is referring to men and women separately in Quran according to Arabic language, ( Rest is in reply ↓ )

[@marion34999]

('man' also refer to both men and women in Quran if the ayah doesn't state it is referring to men and women separately in Quran according to Arabic language, although 'man' is not stated on those ayahs even then I explained), from previous ayahs to those ayahs nowhere it is indicated that it is referring to only men, so if this ayahs indicate permissibility of sex with spouse or right hand possess then it is permissible for both men and women to have sex with their slave. And in those two ayahs there isn't stated spouse 'and' right hand possess rather stated 'or' - spouse 'or' right hand possess.., so whatever is said to be permissible here, the two will not be permissible together, If you do it by your right hand possess, it will not be permissible by your wife (so cannot marry if you will continue that with right hand possess) and vise-versa (but 'and' is stated for prophet Mohammad (Sa.)) .. also maybe this verses are not talking about permissibility of sexual slavery, spouse and right hand possess are said to be permissible in this ayah for other subject. Links at the end if this are about this. I found in several places this inforformations of this link - www.newageislam.com/islamic-ideology/s-arshad,-new-age-islam/true-meaning-of-the-phrase-‘ma-malakat-aymanukum’--does-it-mean-only-male-or-female-slaves?/d/114304 that the phrase ma malakat aymanukum can also refer to poor and needy persons, male or female. In the Quran, the word ‘Abd’ is used for male servant and ‘amah’ is used for female servant. So, when the Quran wants to specify any one of them it uses specific words but when it speaks of both, it uses the phrase ma malakat aymanukum and leaves it to the reader to understand its meaning according to the context. In Surah Al Nur, the Quran gives a list of men or male members of her family before whom she can come without Purdah or reveal her adornment: Here too, the phrase Ma Malakat Aymanuhunna is used meaning slaves. Obviously, here slave means male slaves. “and not to reveal their adornment save to their own husbands or fathers or husbands' fathers, or their sons or their husbands' sons, or their brothers or their brothers' sons or sisters' sons, or their women, or their slaves, or male attendants who lack vigour, or children who know naught of women's nakedness.” (Al Nur: 31) --- “Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess” (Al Nisa: 24) The above quoted verse deals with the women who are prohibited for men for marriage. Among those are the women too who are though married but are prisoners of war and are in the custody of Muslims. Therefore, in this context, “whom your right hands possess” does not mean only female slaves but also prisoners of war among women. (So if this context was saying sex with ma malakat aymanukum is permissible than it means sex with prisoner of war is permissible? -without making them slave?) --- On one or two occasions, Quran also uses the word ‘Fatayat” to specifically mean young maids or female captives in addition to the phrase ‘Ma Malakat Aymanukum’”: “Ma Malakat Aymanukum Min Fatayatukum Al Muminat” (Al Nisa; 25) It means young girls among your captives or slaves. This also shows that Ma Malakat Aymanukum is gender neutral and only means slaves or female slaves. “La Takrahu Fatayatikum” (Al Nur: 33) “Do not force your female slaves (into prostitution) --- “Allah has bestowed His gifts of sustenance more freely on some of you than on others: those more favoured are not going to throw back their gifts to those whom their right hands possess, so as to be equal in that respect. Will they then deny the favours of Allah?” (Al Nahl: 71) In this verse, the phrase “Ma Malakat Aymanukum” is not used to mean only male or female slaves but all the poor and needy persons, male or female, dependent on the wealthy and well to do people. This verse also hints at the system of distribution of Zakat because the purpose of Zakat is to distribute a portion of the income or wealth of a well to do person to needy people around him. Thus, all the needy people around a well to do person are ‘Ma Malakat Aymanuhum” according to this verse. The Quran envisages a society where the wealthy will always take care of the needy people around them and will strive to reduce poverty in his area by parting with a portion of their wealth with the poor and the needy. Therefore, all the needy and the destitute under a wealthy person’s purview are his “right hand possession” or “Ma Malakat Aymanuhum” or dependents in terms of financial position and it is his religious duty to take care of them. So, even a beggar, an orphan or a destitute person comes under the phrase ‘Ma Malakat Aymanukum’. This is the broader meaning of the term “Ma Malakat Aymanukum”. Link - www.newageislam.com/islamic-ideology/s-arshad,-new-age-islam/true-meaning-of-the-phrase-‘ma-malakat-aymanukum’--does-it-mean-only-male-or-female-slaves?/d/114304 ______ What if the slave woman doesn't know those Islamic rules (that she can turn their relationship as boss and employee etc) and her master only inform her that he can have sex with her and offers her to have sex with him and she feels she have to do it although he doesn't make her feel like that in 'unislamic' way?/he doesn't give her permission to meet other people and go outside home so that she never get to know those rules? Or he took her to a place where no one lived far away (many people take their wife to such places to emotionally control them, leaving her helpless in such an environment, weakening her courage) so that she kind of feels like she has to depend on this man and there is no other way/help/way to to live without him, also she doesn't know those Islamic rules.. so that in the end she has to agree to have sex although she doesn't want to (as a slave she will be obliged to go with him in such place if he orders her to go with him? as I understand). Even in today's world in many places girls are tricked to go to foreign countries and they give them in marriage in villages, where they couldn't get help, ask for help because of language barrier, they didn't know their language. I don't remember/know all the countries where it happened but there are many places where it happened even several years ago like villages in Turkey, Vietnam, maybe still happens. This types of stories happens in cities too where even if they are not threatened they understand they just can't leave the home and have to live with them. Would you like if this things happen to your family member? Maybe someone will think it can happen to someone's wife too so that doesn't mean we should say marriage is a bad thing, but in this case at least she chose her sexual partner, but she didn't choose her sexual partner if she is in a master-slave relationship, she may need to just agree to sleep with the man she doesn't like or doesn't want to sleep with someone when she is his slave in this case. Forced marriage is haram in Islam. females have the right to choose her husband in Islam. What if a slave woman's master look at her by hiding while she is changing her dress? Is it stated somewhere he cannot look at her for sexual pleasure till she gives permission? Would a muslim women or any women want that?→ before me deciding who will be my sexual parter (we can choose husband, not master to be his slave) anyone watch me naked without my knowledge? Don't forget your muslim sisters could be at that place as a slave too. In Islam females have to reach puberty *and* need to have mental maturity to get married, but is there any such requirement stated for slave girls in Islam to engage sexually with their master? What if the master of a minor slave girl doesn't know minor girls can have serious physical, mental harm if someone have sex with them and have sex with his minor slave girl? Maybe sexual slavery isn't permissible in Islam. In English kzbin.info/www/bejne/npyke51prK-fqMU In Urdu+Hindi kzbin.info/www/bejne/onWve36PqNOKisk In Urdu+Hindi kzbin.info/www/bejne/bIGtoIeNm7d_itk If anyone wants, I can give a video in Bengali and I can give more videos on this subject.

[@a.k.7341]

Sexual harm/rape of ANY human being is ALWAYS evil, in all circumstances. So these vulnerable women needed protection. Sexual activity must NEVER be coerced. If you are ok with women being abused, you are absolutely ok with this being done to your family as well. God would not create something just to torture it

[@a.k.7341]

@@marion34999 Sexual harm/rape of ANY human being is ALWAYS evil, in all circumstances. So these vulnerable women needed protection. Sexual activity must NEVER be coerced. If you are ok with women being abused, you are absolutely ok with this being done to your family as well

[@lemonginger7201]

Subhanallah

[@hidayahqa]

Dear Sister please Correct Citeation of ch8:verse 67 It behoves not a Prophet to take captives until he has sufficiently suppressed the enemies in the land. You merely seek the gains of the world whereas Allah desires (for you the good) of the Hereafter. Allah is All-Mighty, All-Wise. You have cited 68 . But Thanks for this informative Video

[@7edartheq787]

This women is lying through her teeth

[@Katyt-ho1uo]

Yes

[@abrarshaikh2254]

Great research, may god guide us to true path.

[@CHBShifaArif]

thanks, sister for this awareness but please put subtitles on your videos for more clear understanding.

[@thornados4969]

To remove the status as slave girls, the two young women under 20 years old were forced to marry the 58-yr old Muhammad, the killer of their husbands. That is clear understanding and awareness for you. Read the quran and hadith www.alim.org/quran/tafsir/ibn-kathir/surah/33/50/

[@khalidfarhan7]

@@thornados4969 false claims

[@thornados4969]

@@khalidfarhan7 So you deny your own prophet's sunnah as written in the above quran and hadith? So you are now a munafiq? Be careful, according to Quran, you will be hacked off if you murtad.

[@thornados4969]

@@khalidfarhan7 Those are not claims , they are written in your islamic scriptures. Read, you ignorant.

[@khalidfarhan7]

@@thornados4969 you can search all your false claims in alislam.org and see for yourself. You're quite deep into ignorance by having wasted your time on anti Islamic website. You think that's supposed to be some kind of reliable source of knowledge.

[@Zeneo55]

She is sugar coating sins

[@bornbranded29]

Why's this lady running so hard? Does Islam allow sex slavery in any of it's authoritative materials?

[@SkanderTurki]

This channel is not islamic, these people are not muslims, they are from a sect that follow a false prophet, they are ahmadiyya...do not hear from them

[@okay4608]

^This just points out at you own ignorance regarding Islam

[@armaan3246]

@Hey username Have you seen my username? what

[@real01afghan21]

@@okay4608 can’t we point out to the ignorance of ur bible been changed and it’s not word of god and cant answer questions?

[@a.k.7341]

Sexual harm/rape of ANY human being is ALWAYS evil, in all circumstances. So these vulnerable women needed protection. Sexual activity must NEVER be coerced. If you are ok with women being abused, you are absolutely ok with this being done to your family as well. Don't fall into that evil trap

[@woodpecker532]

wow

[@soufianechbani1922]

This should be called Rationalized Religion.

[@hakeemmammel]

If this was a new interpretation, we wouldn't have cited 1400 year old book

[@h.lnetwork2455]

"Malak al yamin ملك اليمين" in quran does not mean slaves. Its all fault of the books of "hadith".

[@thornados4969]

The hadith of Muhammad cannot be fault. If you accuse fault, you disobey Muhammad. Read here the truth. /www.alim.org/quran/tafsir/ibn-kathir/surah/33/50/

[@h.lnetwork2455]

@@thornados4969 STOP worshiping al boukhari and start worshiping ALLAH, you have the quran ... read it .

[@thornados4969]

@@h.lnetwork2455 Why you start denying the sunnah of your prophet? Are you not proud of his actions as examples to all muslims? Muhammad enslaved girls only after killing the husbands and fathers. Slave girls were owned by Muhammad to choose for his porno desire, PBUH?

[@thornados4969]

@@h.lnetwork2455 The literal meaning of ملك اليمين" is right hand possess. Application according to the islamic example of Muhammad. Rape, or az-zina bil jabr (الزنا بالجبر), is a crime under Islamic law, and the perpetrator is subject to the hudud, id est capital punishments such as whipping and execution. The Islamic understanding of rape, though, differs markedly from the understanding of rape present in modern codes of law. "maa malakat 'aymaanakum"ما ملكت أيمانكم" or "what your right hand possess", id est slaves, do not have the right to refuse the sexual advances of their owners, and likewise for women taken as booty by victorious Muslim warriors. Wives, likewise, do not have the ability to refuse the sexual advances of their husbands. As such, the rape of slaves and wives is not considered as such in Islamic law. Almost to emphasis the point, the rape of the slaves of other men is treated as property damage, not as zina bil jabr deserving a hadd punishment.

[@thornados4969]

@@h.lnetwork2455 In simple term, it is lawful to rape a wife and right hand posses (owned slave) according to Quran. The rape is haram only against unmarried women.

[@movietower6095]

What woman in her right mind would willingly sleep with the murderer of her brother, father and husband?

[@user-tz9hu9on5x]

This how 🐓defending KFC looks like🤣

[@gabrielfranco7689]

This video is full of lies, and I am a Muslim.

[@1993muth]

What lies? The Quran does permit a relationship with your slave woman, she was not denying it. She was giving it context. She is just saying that slaves had rights and should not be abused. The children of slaves were born as free and with full rights , and should not be austricized. She also said there are avenues you can earn your freedom as a slave. Think of it like paying of your morgage loan. Intrest, debt, and the prison system are our current form of slavery.

[@armaan3246]

@@1993muth but zina is a sin

[@1993muth]

@@armaan3246 In Surat al Nisa, Allah refers to wa ma malakat aymanukum (what your right hand poses). In the tafseer, the classical understanding is that it refers to the slave (women) you own and are responsible for. There is definitely more to this topic, but It's not Zina. I recommend you read into it.

[@armaan3246]

@@1993muth u muslim?

[@trajictempr8574]

Sure your Muslim lmao what kind of Muslims name is Gabriela FRANCO

[@MochammadFaisal]

great explanation.. but i'm sorry, can you give this video a subtitle? because my listening is not good.. thanks before for upload this video.. nice job

[@a..d2062]

We captured some of the women as prisoners, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to release sperms outside of the women. We asked Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) (whether it was permissible). He said, "It is better for you to release sperms inside. No soul, (that which Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come, into existence." Sahih al-Bukhari 2542

[@clarkporter1340]

I can bet the Taliban is standing behjnd the camera. She needs help

[@xoxosharukk9569]

MashaAllah ♥️ absolutely amazing.

[@SS-rj4rn]

Next topic on homeopathy

[@akramkhalid3690]

Very well explained

[@fantasticpriya333]

check out hinduisms rules..... older than most religions.... it gives precise instructions way before islam..... infact when the europeans and mugals came to india they thought slavery did not exist in india

[@Herman47]

One of the most striking hadiths addressing Exploitation of Female Prisoners of War is found directly below: "We [Muhammad’s merry men] went out with Allah's messenger on the expedition to the Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing azl" (withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: "We are doing an act whereas Allah's messenger [i.e., Muhammad] is amongst us; why not ask him?" So we asked Allah's messenger and he said: "It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born". (Sahih Muslim, Vol. 2, #3371) Tellingly, the role model of the Muslims, Muhammad, does not exclaim: “DO NOT FORNICATE WITH THE CAPTIVES!” Nor does he exclaim to the married men: “DO NOT COMMIT ADULTERY WITH THE CAPTIVES!!” Finally, we note that he does not yell: “DO NOT RAPE THE CAPTIVES!!!” So the Debate Question is then: “Why did Muhammad not instead say, “Leave the poor captives alone!”?

[@a.k.7341]

Sexual harm/rape of ANY human being is ALWAYS evil, in all circumstances. So these vulnerable women needed protection. Sexual activity must NEVER be coerced. If you are ok with women being abused, you are absolutely ok with this being done to your family as well

[@user-rl2qq4ey2z]

Do not ask logical questions.

[@amir_ahmed]

Brilliant :)

[@thornados4969]

brilliant for confirming that Muhammad owned slave girls?

[@afshankhan347]

Thank you for making this video.. we all need to know islamic laws for slaves.. what America did with African salves was not normal..

[@viewerabundzu6887]

and it was quite rightly abolished

[@theodoreconstantini2548]

Jihad in Islam is very clearly not just a reference to defensive war, or spiritual struggle, and pretending so is misleading . Jihad is also a reference to expansionist war, to extend the boundaries of Islam, at the clear expense of Non- Muslims, Including Christians. Islam is an inherently expansionist ideology. "Offensive jihad, known in Arabic as جهاد الطلب "jihad at-talab" ("the jihad of request", referring to the invitation to Islam which must be sent to the opposing infidels before hostilities may commence), is understood in the classical sources as an offensive struggle against Dar Al-Harb (the House of War or the realm of the infidels), is a duty incumbent upon Muslims and the Ummah, and as such is to be carried out in a variety of ways. Outright war and fighting is permitted, and as the prophet himself said (in agreement with many great generals and military leaders throughout history such as Sun Tzu and von Clausewitz) "war is deceit" and as such breaking treaties, oaths, and promises is permittable as a part of Jihad on the path of Allah, and likewise all other forms of misdirection as a part of jihad. Muslim scholars generally agree that the duty of Jihad is eternal until "the religion is to Allah" yet significant differences exist between scholars about whether Jihad may be validly conducted when the presence of a caliph and commander of the faithful is lacking". wikiislam.net/wiki/Jihad_in_Islamic_Law#Jihad_in_the_Qur'an

[@saminyasir937]

Don't just interpret things however you want unlike christians we muslims know our religion War is deceit never meant breaking peace treaty you mention scholar, but which scholar are you referring to? wikiIslam is not reference for any Islamic information. Breaking treaty, Oath and promises and lying to the enemy is something which takes someone out of the folds of Islam so, it is not allowed, but yes misdirection as a tactics is allowed so, no classical scholar did not say that you are making things up. And this is what scholars say, Al-Nawawi said: “The scholars are agreed that it is permissible to deceive the kuffaar in war in any way possible, except if that would mean breaking the terms of a treaty or trust, in which case it is not permitted." And yes, Islam has offensive wars, but it is the norm, people did wars of conquest in the past it is a good thing to expand power and political influences to protect the Ummah. liberal concepts of religious freedom and tolerance did not exist in the past ask any Jews their history about what happened to them and Muslims in Spain etc. How about you decry the expansionist wars of America and Israel, and liberal Imperialism? And one other thing in Islam in case of Offensive Jihad pros and cons are weighted and if a war benefits muslims then it can be conducted, it is not a duty upon every Muslim when dedicated army exists cause it is a communal obligation and it is a duty upon on every able-bodied male in case when enemy attacks an Islamic Land as you are calling it. And no jihad does not only refer to wars it does also refer to any type of struggle to convey the truth to non-muslims, or struggling against yourself (As you call it spiritual struggle) etc these are other forms of Jihad. And in case of permission of ruler two different ruling exist for two different scenarios like in case of offensive jihad, Ibn Qudaamah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: The matter of jihad is in the hands of the ruler and his ijtihaad, and the people must obey him in whatever he sees fit with regard to that. End quote. Al-Mughni (10/368). in case of defensive jihad permission of Ruler is not needed it is duty on every muslims.

[@keifer7813]

Video about sex slavery in Islam Beginning: "Let's start by talking about a non-Islamic nation"

[@addul2268]

Very well explained Mashallah

[@thornados4969]

In hadith those slave girls were not freed by merely removed the status as slaves when they married Muhammad, the killer of their husbands. Read the quran and hadith. www.alim.org/quran/tafsir/ibn-kathir/surah/33/50/

[@addul2268]

@@thornados4969 which reference you are quoting here? Be precise. I did read in detail but perhaps you have read in bits and pieces. Go and bring your precise reference I'll teach you again 👍

[@thornados4969]

@@addul2268 just click that link which leads to your islamic scripture. Funny you are supposed to give me because you are a muslim.

[@thornados4969]

@@addul2268 Teach me about that particular link. lol.

[@thornados4969]

@@addul2268 I summarized the fate of 2 girls under 20 who were taken by Muhammad as slaves after murdering their husbands and fathers. The two girls were forced to marry the 58 yr old pervert Muhammad to change the status from slaves to Muhmmad'wives. That's how the hadith is all about. So what teaching do want you to say now?

[@user-nb2ub9hn8s]

Why are there so many stupid hateful comments all of a sudden?

[@justahuman6928]

Islam need reformation

[@Theunknownpast_official]

Then it will become corrupt

[@AhmadEdinHodzic]

Slavery verse is a test for unbelievers! “It is He who has sent down to you, [O Muḥammad], the Book; in it are verses [that are] precise - they are the foundation of the Book - and others unspecific.1 As for those in whose hearts is deviation [from truth], they will follow that of it which is unspecific, seeking discord and seeking an interpretation [suitable to them]. And no one knows its [true] interpretation except Allāh. But those firm in knowledge say, "We believe in it. All [of it] is from our Lord." And no one will be reminded except those of understanding.” Salam

[@takiyaazrin7562]

We captured some of the women as prisoners, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to release sperms outside of the women (coitus interruptus). We asked Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) whether it was permissible. He said, "It is better for you to release sperms inside." Sahih al-Bukhari 2542

[@LPYNM]

@@takiyaazrin7562 I saw Abu Sa`id and asked him about coitus interruptus. Abu Sa`id said, "We went with Allah's Apostle, in the Ghazwa of Bani Al-Mustaliq and we captured some of the 'Arabs as captives, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to practice coitus interruptus. We asked Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) (whether it was permissible). He said, "It is better for you not to do so. No soul, (that which Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come, into existence." Liar stop making things up that's the real one

[@takiyaazrin7562]

@@LPYNM We captured excellent women for ransom. We decided to have sex with them but by observing 'azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). We asked Allah's Messenger (ﷺ), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. Sahih Muslim 1438a

[@nothanks8594]

No slavery in Islam

[@rakeshrawat4168]

So why Indian women were used as sex slave raped and nude March first study then say

[@AA-so1xs]

Is this an official Ahmadiyya channel?

[@khalidgonzalez4882]

yes

[@dontgetmewrong4317]

Thanks for pointing out this channel belongs to Qadianis. They aren't recognised as Muslims by all Muslims.

[@cornflakesmachine300]

@@dontgetmewrong4317 "Whatever is in the heavens and whatever is in the earth glorifies Allah, the Sovereign, the Holy, the Mighty, the Wise. He it is Who has raised among the Unlettered people a Messenger from among themselves who recites unto them His Signs, and purifies them, and teaches them the Book and wisdom, although they had been, before, in manifest misguidance; And among others from among them who have not yet joined them. He is the Mighty, the Wise.That is Allah’s grace; He bestows it on whom He pleases; and Allah is the Master of immense grace." [62:1-5] The Message of the Holy Prophet was meant not only for the Arabs among whom he was raised but for all non-Arabs as well, and not only for his contemporaries but also for the generations to come till the end of time. Or, the verse may signify that the Holy Prophet will be raised among another people who have not yet joined his immediate followers. The reference in the verse and in a well-known saying of the Holy Prophet is to the Second Advent of the Holy Prophet himself in the person of the Promised Messiah in the Latter Days. Says Abu Hurairah: 'One Day we were sitting with the Holy Prophet when Surah Jumu‘ah was revealed. I enquired from the Holy Prophet, Who are the people to whom the words, 'And among others of them who have not yet joined them,' refer.' Salman, the Persian, was sitting among us. Upon my repeatedly asking him the same question, the Holy Prophet put his hand on Salman and said, 'If Faith were to go up to the Pleiades, a man from these would, surely, find it' (Bukhari). This saying of the Holy Prophet shows that the verse applies to a man of Persian descent. The Promised Messiah, was of Persian descent. Other sayings of the Holy Prophet speak of the appearance of the Messiah at a time when there would remain nothing of the Qur’an but its words and of Islam but its name, i.e. the true spirit of Islamic teaching will have been lost (Baihaqi). Thus the Qur’an and the Hadith both agree that the present verse refers to the Second Advent of the Holy Prophet in the person of the Promised Messiah. Sahih Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 60, Hadith #420 Mishkat al-Masabih 276

[@thornados4969]

@@cornflakesmachine300 Your reference has nothing to do with islamic slavery - the subject of the video. Quran 33:50 Prophet! Verily, We have made lawful to you your wives, to whom you have paid their due (dowery), and those (slaves) whom your right hand possesses -- whom Allah has given to you, and the daughters of your paternal uncles and the daughters of your paternal aunts and the daughters of your maternal uncles and the daughters of your maternal aunts who migrated with you, and a believing woman if she offers herself to the Prophet, and the Prophet wishes to marry her -- a privilege for you only, not for the (rest of) the believers. Indeed We know what We have enjoined upon them about their wives and those (slaves) whom their right hands possess, in order that there should be no difficulty on you. And Allah is Ever Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

[@cornflakesmachine300]

@@thornados4969 it was a reply to the comment stating ahmadis are not Muslims....

[@jamjar342]

MahshAllah, this is a common misconception

[@thornados4969]

You are wrong, it's not misconception. Read the hadith. /www.alim.org/quran/tafsir/ibn-kathir/surah/33/50/

[@Coriolanus89]

@@thornados4969 You still here trolling away? The video proves the opposite. He released any prisoner who came to him.

[@thornados4969]

@@Coriolanus89 My post was based on quran and hadith word for word. So, you accuse the sunnah of Muhammad as troll now? The release was not mean to release free. It means change the status as 'slave-girl' to another 'wife-girl' of the 58 yr old grandpervert. Read the quran and hadith : "....(those (slaves) whom your right hand possesses whom Allah has given to you,) means, `the slave-girls whom you took from the war booty are also permitted to you.' He owned Safiyyah and Juwayriyah, then he manumitted them and married them, and he owned Rayhanah bint Sham`un An-Nadariyyah and Mariyah Al-Qibtiyyah, the mother of his son Ibrahim, upon him be peace; they were both among the prisoners, may Allah be pleased with them.".

[@Junaiiid_Ahmed]

Plz just say us Muslims. Not ahmadiyaa,sunni,shia,etc. Its time we should be united ,plz don't divide us .As a preacher You should unit muslim not divide them.😢

[@ajaydalaya2195]

First of all why did muhammad had thr desire and need to raid another kingdom and thereby fighting with the local armies ? And capturing their women as captives. Secondly why would these captive women would even feel the urge of marrying with the Muslim invaders ? If their husbands, fathers, uncles, brothers, sons have been brutally tortured and killed in front of them. Thirdly why would these women even convert into islam ? I understand beacuse the sword is mighty.

[@ahmadiyyamuslimconvert6363]

Alhamdulillah thumma Alhamdulillah

[@achaadmi]

People can find faults with everything, no matter how good it is. Same goes for teachings and practices of Islam. Till today no one has presented better teachings and practices in comparable situations. I have sort of given up ... Well made video by the way, apart from sliding down the presenter to make room for text :-)

[@achaadmi]

@Prophet Pork barbarian I will take this any day over cavity searches at traffic stops by the roadside in "modern" society. Hate makes people blind. Peace.

[@achaadmi]

@harishkumar india 1. Yes, any day similar in circumstances to that day. This is not saying that what is written in books of Hadith is all correct and true account of what happened. Principles are laid out in the Quran, and are to date the best I have come across. All the good and humane legislation we find today can be traced back to principles brought by religious. Quran has preserved these in their unaltered form. 2. Cavity searches are legally protected in self proclaimed leader of the Free and civilized world, the USA. Be it for a broken tail light, speed violation or immigration, doesn't matter. Wasn't so long ago that India was upset with USA over the treatment of a lady from their diplomatic staff.

[@achaadmi]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/eXPYkISfp5V-b6c One of the unfortunately too many on KZbin. And only a very few end up on KZbin.

[@achaadmi]

@harishkumar india There are already more than enough people in the world finding problems, with everything and anything. If you have better, more practical and humane solutions, proven to have worked better in similar situations, please don't hold back. I have seen beauty and I like it. If you show me something even more beautiful, I will like it even more. Thanks.

[@dark7element]

@@achaadmi If you believe that the aggressive warfare, anti-intellectualism, sex slavery (which this very video excuses and justifies), and totalitarian oppression of Islam to be "beautiful", then you are a savage.

[@ariankhan8882]

Mirza gulam ahmed qadiani ( finari jahannam) was a lanati and murtad. May grant jahannam fake prophet mirza gulam qadiani and his followers ahmediya community

[@reckondragon2130]

A muslim woman lying about compelling women.

[@movietower6095]

Why were Civilians taken as slaves? What was their fault?

[@ahlalfiqh]

interesting

[@thornados4969]

What's interesting - the slave girls?

[@ahlalfiqh]

@@thornados4969 You have great curiosity.

[@thornados4969]

@@ahlalfiqh yeah I'm curious what you found interesting. For me, islamic slavery is clear according to the islamic scriptures.

[@ahlalfiqh]

@@thornados4969 So it seems you have done quite research on that topic of "slavery", right? I'm curious to know what makes you take such a decison to do research on this topic? Is there any motive behind that, I meab maybe you are an athiest or someone whom believe in any other faith, right?

[@thornados4969]

@@ahlalfiqh I am not researcher. I just read like other readers. So what's interesting? Don't say something else.

[@nsanjayshet4883]

haha good joke

[@123dsj123]

In all of human history, no book has disturbed the peace of innocent people than the following two books: (1) The Muslims called their holy book “The KORAN” and (2) the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) called their holy book “The KLORAN”. Interestingly, each book tells its adherents (believers, followers) that they, alone, are the “Supreme Race” or the “Best of mankind” created by God. Sadly, that is the source of the needless pain, terror, and injustice that both the Muslims and the Klansmen love to inflict on other human beings who they considered to be inferior to them. * “The greatest among you is the one who acts like the youngest, and serves you.” - Jesus Christ, Friend of sinners, Creator and Owner of Love, Son of God (Christianity: Gospel of Luke: 22:26)

[@wonderingsoul5011]

oh plz, the crusaders, the conquistadors, the atlantic slave trade, European wars, the Inquisition, just to name a few. Don't throw stones if you live in a glass house.

[@123dsj123]

You talked about the crusaders, the conquistadors, the atlantic slave trade, European wars, the Inquisition. You forgot to mention the book that support these atrocities. Again, in all of human history, no book has disturbed the peace of innocent people than the following two books: (1) The Muslims called their holy book “The KORAN” and (2) the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) called their holy book “The KLORAN”. Interestingly, each book tells its adherents (believers, followers) that they, alone, are the “Supreme Race” or the “Best of mankind” created by God. Sadly, that is the source of the needless pain, terror, and injustice that both the Muslims and the Klansmen love to inflict on other human beings who they considered to be inferior to them.

[@wonderingsoul5011]

@@123dsj123 You obviously don't know your Bible, the curse of Ham Genesis 9:18-27 was used by Christians to justify slavery and Ephesians 6:5-7. So please don't be a hypocrite.

[@123dsj123]

@@wonderingsoul5011 You wrote: “You obviously don't know your Bible…” Let me tell you some truths about my Bible: There are three religions that refer to Abraham as Father: The three religions are: (1) Judaism, (2) Christianity, and (3) Islam. Each of these three religions has its own “official holy book”. For Judaism, the Official Holy Book is the Old Testament. Without the Old Testament, there is no Judaism. For Christianity, the Official Holy Book is the New Testament. Without the New Testament, there is no Christianity. For Islam, the official holy book is the Quran. Without the Quran, there is no Islam. * You also added: “The curse of Ham in Genesis 9:18-27 was used by Christians to justify slavery and Ephesians 6:5-7.” * The Muslim holy book (Koran) refers to Muslims as the “best of mankind”. The Ku Klux Klan (KKK) holy book (Kloran) refers to the Klan’s men as the “supreme race” of people. Did you say, “Both Genesis 9:18-27 and Ephesians 6:5-7 refer to Christian as either “best of mankind” or the “supreme race” of people?”

[@wonderingsoul5011]

@@123dsj123 Yes I say humbly let me tell you about your bible, The Old Testament refers to the Jewish nation as the 'chosen people' on many occasions. Whether you want to understand this word to mean elected or preferred, there is no doubt the Jewish nation continues to think they are special because God chose them.Christians believe they have inherited this with the new covenant. As for Islam, you are right it does say 'Muslims are the best for mankind', but the verse continues 'Ye enjoin right conduct and forbid indecency; and ye believe in God' So we do not think ourselves better just because we are called Muslims, but because we are suppose to believe in God and encourage good conduct, like prayer, fasting, and feeding the poor, and forbid evil, like alcohol, gambling and sexual immorality. Christians who do this are praised in the Quran, the Quran only rebukes Christian theology. Peace.

[@satnaamverma6792]

ahmadi are not muslim

[@radjeshsingh]

Without lies , islam dies .

[@a..d2062]

We captured some of the women as prisoners, and the long separation from our wives was pressing us hard and we wanted to release sperms outside of the women. We asked Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) (whether it was permissible). He said, "It is better for you to release sperms inside. No soul, (that which Allah has) destined to exist, up to the Day of Resurrection, but will definitely come, into existence." Sahih al-Bukhari 2542

[@a.k.7341]

Sexual harm/rape of ANY human being is ALWAYS evil, in all circumstances. So these vulnerable women needed protection. Sexual activity must NEVER be coerced. If you are ok with women being abused, you are absolutely ok with this being done to your family as well. God would NOT create something just to torture it

[@a..d2062]

@@a.k.7341 agreed

[@prawnfishh]

Stop twisting the hadeeth

[@a..d2062]

look it up, many Muslims dont know much abut the hadiths or the darker parts of Islam@@prawnfishh