As a 90 year old historian with an Abdication speciality I can give you no greater praise than saying I wish I had written and deliveref that analysis myself. I shake your hand, Sir.
@erstwhile61632 жыл бұрын
A tremendous compliment.
@michelebrowne4182 жыл бұрын
Mary, you are incredibly sweet. What a lovely compliment and so especially appreciated as I always wonder if I should comment or not. I’ve always found Wallis an David so fascinating and now to see their story being repeated in a new generation is unbelievable. There is one crucial difference though as others have noted: at least Harry is the second son and not the heir. Off that we can be thankful. All my best to you, Michele
@kateskeys2 жыл бұрын
What a well written post. Touché 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
@bunnymad5049 Жыл бұрын
Mary, you'd be so interesting to chat with!!!! Wish I could come over for coffee and just sit and listen to you. xxxx
@susanburns276 Жыл бұрын
What an abundance of knowledge you must have? How wonderful to be blessed with such a wealth of information on such thing's, you must be amazing! 🇭🇲👵👏👏👏
@beev94852 жыл бұрын
“A narcissist is the hero and victim of every story they tell”
@joyeverlasting6124 Жыл бұрын
So well said. I compliment you greatly as it is a choice piece of inciteful wisdom. Thank you for the gem,may you have treasure in your brain in all ways and always. Your fan
@JuliannaGeorgiana2 жыл бұрын
"Wallis wanted to be Queen of England...Megan believes she's Queen of the World " 🤣🤣
@tinageorge8058 Жыл бұрын
Priceless 😂😂
@jacquelinewhite1046 Жыл бұрын
Ouch
@anthonywilliams9852 Жыл бұрын
Actually Wallis didn't want to become Queen, she did everything she could to dissuade Edward from marrying her, saying that they were not compatible, that he couldn't abdicate the throne just to marry her etc but he replied to her that he would pursue her to the end of the world if she ran away from him and if she refused to marry her he would slit his throat, so Wallis regretfully had to acquiesce to his wishes of marrying her. But she hated every moment of her decision to marry him, she felt like a bird locked in a gilded cage.
@apureenergyme8573 Жыл бұрын
@@anthonywilliams9852 she backed out because she found out that he doesn’t want to be king, that makes her can’t be the queen. That’s where she started telling him that she wants out.
@suelearning2313 Жыл бұрын
I laughed so hard,, love it😅
@angiemeyer9532 жыл бұрын
I love how this man just roasts people in the most chill way. I'm addicted to it!
@erincraddock1555Ай бұрын
Best description ever!! 😂
@thevenusian13148 ай бұрын
The major difference between The Windsors and The Sussex's is that Edward essentially trapped Wallis into marrying him. She begged him not to abdicate, and when he did she only married him out of guilt.
@murphychurch82512 жыл бұрын
"Both women selected royal partners who did not enjoy school" 😂😂😂 I love the choice of words! 😁👍
@johnc24382 жыл бұрын
"Daaahhhdddyyy!"
@annwethenorth2 жыл бұрын
Lol
@anabaird38352 жыл бұрын
DR. G. HAS ALL THE BEST WORDS!🤗
@deejames1st2 жыл бұрын
That was so funny! I love the way he throws shade.
@robynholliday47942 жыл бұрын
Haha
@shawnnewell45412 жыл бұрын
I've always seen Edward VIII's abdication as a blessing. He would have been a disaster if he'd been king during WWII. Wallis did Britain a favor by removing him from the throne.
@rupatiwari59232 жыл бұрын
Absolutely
@browniehendricks37262 жыл бұрын
I agree.
@laurenmay20982 жыл бұрын
You are aware that England had a parliament and a prime minister? That even at that time they didn't do anything without approval? Okay, I guess you do know they are just there, not to command, it was 20 century already. When his father denied saving his family from Russia, and all of them were killed, guess who gave the advice? The prime minister, do not get involved, he is your cousin, but we are in a very bad situation, well, his entire cousins family were murdered.
@shawnnewell45412 жыл бұрын
@@laurenmay2098 That is what they'd like you to believe. I had an English stepmother and she let me know how the system really works.
@Faristol72 жыл бұрын
Shawn Newell: You're dead right! He was pusillanimous and 'pussy-whipped, so yeah, would not have made a good Head of State when we were up against Hitler's fascist Europe.
@mshockey732 жыл бұрын
"A compliment from Adolph Hitler is worse than almost any insult from anyone else"....lol. The comparisons of these two couples is fascinating.
@GK-li4wt2 жыл бұрын
Big difference: Hitler would not accept a biracial guest…
@archiebunkers78812 жыл бұрын
That is indeed interesting. Edward and Wallace had no children, I believe the same with Harry and his wife - nobody has seen them
@Swansong3212 жыл бұрын
@Oh Well I used to read these theories and think what nonsensical rubbish .but not any more!..I'd literally just about believe ANYTHING is a possibility with Megs Mandela
@Decgyrrl2 жыл бұрын
Only difference is: Hitler, was b4 Prince Harry & Meagan Markle's, time😁😀😁😀
@deejames1st2 жыл бұрын
Meghan should remember this when she next receives a public compliment from Oprah.
@laurahoward54262 жыл бұрын
It Amazes me that someone finally came along to make Wallis, Simpson look good.....
@EKA201-j7f Жыл бұрын
Gave me a laugh, thanks. I know what you mean!
@sunnyday7843 Жыл бұрын
There is a very well done video on you tube about Wallis and her recently discovered letters to her ex
@EKA201-j7f Жыл бұрын
@@sunnyday7843 I saw something about her wanting to have a baby by her ex maybe and that she wanted to be with this guy but he turned her down so she went with the King. Is that the one?
@sunnyday7843 Жыл бұрын
@@EKA201-j7f I can try to find the link -
@EKA201-j7f Жыл бұрын
@@sunnyday7843 I found several interesting ones. Thanks !
@janedoe52292 жыл бұрын
I read that Markle did not want her children attending British schools because they were "pale, stale, and male". That's exactly what Harry is, and yet, she married him. If you don't like British culture, then don't marry a Prince of England.
@samcad-ho3ze2 жыл бұрын
There’s a rumour Wallis was always in love with her ex husband too. She never really loved Edward but felt obliged to stay with him because of the gravity of the situation.
@margeebechyne86422 жыл бұрын
It's not a rumor. They found letters and a book was written about it. Sad for Edward.
@woodenseagull18992 жыл бұрын
I understand it was the Milk man..!
@66kaisersoza2 жыл бұрын
Wallis was far more charismatic and intelligent than Edward. Her and her former husband were intellectually compatible. She would often write to him explaining about the huge mistake she made.
@cheshirecat26412 жыл бұрын
She stayed with him for free money, life of luxury and no need to work - not because of an obligation. She's easily divorced two other men, she could have done the same with a third one. Spare the bs, she was as calculating as today's footballer's wives.
@66kaisersoza2 жыл бұрын
@@cheshirecat2641 according to the letters, her second husband was very complicit about her relationship with Edward (in the beginning at least). They both wanted to raise their own profiles by having high connections, but things got out of hand. Im not excusing her behaviour by any means.
@cb97462 жыл бұрын
What a resume. Talents include spending money, briefcase holding, and extensive work as a professional victim.
@cherieceliene45822 жыл бұрын
I like your “professional victim.” Perfect.
@debras90202 жыл бұрын
Don’t forget - Out of Work Actress
@jkgent40872 жыл бұрын
Spot on.
@annjohnson61932 жыл бұрын
Plus snaring wealthy guys.
@ach40492 жыл бұрын
Are we talking about Wallis or Meghan? lol
@lnc-to4ku2 жыл бұрын
This was both so fascinating, and so well put together!! Had to laugh at "Meghan Markle assumes that she is witty, and good at conversation." "They are going to construct their own reputaion, which will amaze people." 😅😂
@MegaMesozoic2 жыл бұрын
They are amazing people right enough, but not in the way they hope!
@brendagarnder97582 жыл бұрын
THAT YACHT GIRL RACHEL MEGAN RAGLAND IS NOT ALLOWED TO USE THE FAMILY NAME MARKLE!
@deejames1st2 жыл бұрын
@@MegaMesozoic Amazingly terrible! At everything!
@MedusasFeelinSalty2 жыл бұрын
Megan is excellent at whining and at being a professional victim, but that's about it. The only things she ever talks about is the Royal family and their supposed mistreatment of her because of her skin color, and anything related to herself, except of course her bullying and narcissism. She could be talking about global nuclear war with her guests and she'll somehow turn it into something about her. Her "podcast" only underscores that.
@LilyAmongThorns2 жыл бұрын
@@MedusasFeelinSalty she sure knows how to deflect attention away from her lies and hypocrisy by claiming “racism!!” or people attacking her for being an “amazing ambitious woman” 😂🤣
@janedoe52292 жыл бұрын
Markle said she wanted to be the next Princess Diana, but instead she became the next Wallis Simpson. Markle will never be like Princess Diana. With all her faults, Diana cared about other people. Markle only cares about herself.
@sherberts10 күн бұрын
She's not even as good as Wallis
@d.s.archer59032 жыл бұрын
12:20 That photo of Markle as a Suitcase Girl PERFECTLY captures the fullest extent of her acting ability.
@EKA201-j7f Жыл бұрын
I am worried that she is actually learning another facial expression (mask) or two.
@dejhary81322 жыл бұрын
You are spot on Dr. Grande. There is no better way to compare MM but to no other than Wallis. Thank you for digging farther into historical archives and shedding light on the infamous lives of Wallis and Edward. You made such an intelligible comparison on Wallis and MM as opposed to the mainstream media comparing a striking parallel between MM and Princess Diana which is utterly appalling.
@phillipaclemons72612 жыл бұрын
@Dej Hary I don’t blame she and Harry wanting to get out, but their ‘poor us’ act is a drag. As for MM comparing herself to Diana, that is weird. The British Royal family will go on being loved in the UK and admired elsewhere, long after people get tired of the Sussex drama
@alyscstudjo69092 жыл бұрын
Hear hear! Now that you've mentioned it, I realize I have never held a comparison of MM to Princess Di. Appalling indeed.
@jimwolfgang94332 жыл бұрын
what media is doing that? the US? not the UK's that's for sure!
@sylviamcgeary35872 жыл бұрын
Why would Harry think that reminds him of his mother and for her to think so as well and start dressing like her it's disgusting to take on the persona of a much loved Princess of Wales
@georgemartin14362 жыл бұрын
Two royals who made dumb decisions when they lost blood pressure to their brains...
@loislewis52292 жыл бұрын
Samantha did not sue meghan because of the claim of being an only child, but for defaming Samantha’s character. Meghan also has a half brother, Thomas Jr.
@LilyAmongThorns2 жыл бұрын
Yes, Samantha was being lied about by the media because of her sister’s insinuations and blame shifting. I do not envy anyone in Rachel’s family. Narcissists are not easy to deal with and if you become their target can make your life a misery.
@Andypandieful2 жыл бұрын
It’s underway still. Court date is a ways off.
@padraig5812 жыл бұрын
Exactly there was a whole chapter titled The problem with Samantha. The first sentence read that the problem began with Samantha. In the notes megaliar sent to her private secretary Jason to give emid scabies about Samantha were horrendous and slander for example, megaliar said Samantha had dropped out of school, had 3 children to different fathers and they were removed from her care because she was an abusive mother. The chapter which megaliar herself told emid to write is absolutely awful and utter lies. Bravo Samantha for having put the record straight and expose her delusional and narcissistic sister.
@knightingirl2 жыл бұрын
@@LilyAmongThorns Who's Rachel?
@hjkayel96102 жыл бұрын
@@knightingirl Rachel Meghan Markle - that's her full name
@tracyw11232 жыл бұрын
"Briefcase holding ability test"...too funny!
@alexisgreen14532 жыл бұрын
I get tired of hearing about MM except from Dr Grande. He adds just the right amount of snark.
@cwynn15472 жыл бұрын
The one thing these couples have in common is absolutely no one feels sorry for them.
@VeeLondon14492 жыл бұрын
This was really interesting. I agree he never wanted the responsibility/role as King. Edward would reveal himself to be a awful person with abhorrent views. I can’t imagine how having him as The King would have been a benefit to the UK.
@TheFakeyCakeMaker2 жыл бұрын
Both of them were nasty racists who admired Hitler but let's not talk about that.
@justmyopinion5262 жыл бұрын
wife sharing and mistresses was so the norm in "higher" society. Having watched and read about her life I feel that as soon as she realised what Edward was prepared to do she wanted out. There was no escape so I think she accepted her fate and went with the flow. I dont feel it was her choice though. Maybe that explains their volatile often cruel relationship. Edward seemed content in her though. Rachel seems to be jumping on the bandwagon now.. Rachel lives in a world where she chose and knew what she accepted.. and yes your thinking is spot on..
@vernongrant35962 жыл бұрын
Edward was a total rat bag but so was his grandfather Edward the 7 th and he turned out to be a great diplomat on becoming king.
@TheGreatPresenter2 жыл бұрын
Having recently watched Traitor King, there is another dimension to Edward VIII and it's not pretty.
@browniehendricks37262 жыл бұрын
Great insight
@missyskye_sea_land94242 жыл бұрын
OMG Dr. Grande! While I was staying up late into the morning again last night, I decided to read about the Duke and a Duchess of Windsor again, thinking of how Meghan and Prince Harry reminded me of them. The choices both men made are so tragic - they seem(ed) extremely unhappy and sad. History repeats itself. Thanks for the video, Dr. Grande.
@stevenrichards36992 жыл бұрын
I found out in my 20's that women are just a source of heartache, and disappointment.
@johnc24382 жыл бұрын
Nahhhh... it doesn't repeat itself. But it certainly rhymes! 🙃
@SgtWaters2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I'm sure living the high life in Hollywood is miserable. He looks like someone who realized he made a terrible decision and wish his life was like William who is the picture of happiness. We should all be so lucky to live a horrible life like Harry.
@musicandbooklover-p2o2 жыл бұрын
According to my mum - who was a child when it happened and who probably got her views/opinions from her parents - it wasn't a tragic marriage but a blessing. A blessing for the citizens of Great Britain and the empire that was.
@georgiannerobinson53402 жыл бұрын
Yes, a blessing because he was friends with Hitler.
@ericaadams21832 жыл бұрын
Thank you for seeing MM as she truly is. I hate that people constantly say Americans are enamored by her. I’m a biracial American who thinks she is a narcissistic person who wants to destroy the BRF because she didn’t get a starring role.
@rhonda67912 жыл бұрын
True she wanted to be queen. And she’s extremely lazy.
@deejames1st2 жыл бұрын
Thank you. It’s getting so old how the p r makes it seem like we have all been duped when it’s the furthest thing from the truth.
@LilyAmongThorns2 жыл бұрын
@@rhonda6791 I wish her mouth was lazy 😂
@LilyAmongThorns2 жыл бұрын
Erica Adams, thank you for your honesty. It seems “they” want everyone to divide along “racially appropriate lines” to side with our appointed racial profile. That is racist. We need to realize there are good and evil people in every culture, skin colour, country, etc., and quit calling someone a racist for simply calling out someone doing wrong that isn’t the same skin colour. MeAgain wants all the glory with no criticism while telling whoppers and casting aside people she doesn’t need anymore, and then tries to be a role model for young girls and women. No young girls/women need that kind of role model.
@forgottenquill70632 жыл бұрын
Well good for you. When should we throw your "I'm so unique" party?
@cathryncampbell85552 жыл бұрын
"A briefcase-holding queen of the world" is such eloquent snark! Thank you, Dr. Grande -- & kudos for noticing the way Meghan copies Wallis's hair & dress styles.
@nancywatkins26222 жыл бұрын
Wallis had class...and disappeared into the sunset.
@gocatgo28432 жыл бұрын
Wallis Simpson tried to get out of marrying Edward but things had gone too far and she felt she had no choice. MM enticed Harry by invoking similarities with his mother and acting like she was keen to be part of the RF.both married weaker men.
@anipopescu2 жыл бұрын
Really? What similarities?
@MrsRitchieBlackmore2 жыл бұрын
@@anipopescu Before H and M married, M wore similar outfits and posed similar to Diana, even going so far as to wear Diana's perfume! She promoted herself as a philanthropist who supported the same causes. Most importantly, she played the "victim to the press" angle up to the max, knowing it would touch a raw nerve with H. She says inflammatory things publicly, the press reacts, then she moans that she is being attacked!! It has worked very well.
@LadyOfShaIott2 жыл бұрын
Brilliant analysis Dr Grande. Wallis accepted that they had broken the rules and never spoke ill of the Royal Family. I wonder what she would have made of Meghan? Many thanks 🙏
@QueenBee-gx4rp2 жыл бұрын
Wallis at least had good breeding, unlike…….
@LadyOfShaIott2 жыл бұрын
@@QueenBee-gx4rp The truth 👍
@johnryskamp29432 жыл бұрын
You're wrong. Both Wallis and Edward constantly made fun, both of the king and the queen. Wallis was a Nazi witch.
@evelynbonner39082 жыл бұрын
@@QueenBee-gx4rp I don't know that we can attribute Megain's utter cruelty to others, her lying, and attention seeking to her upbringing. Her father sounds like a man who did the very best he could. I don't know much about Doria.
@zitronentee2 жыл бұрын
@@QueenBee-gx4rp I don't think we can blame MM's upbringing. She herself may be the problem. I've seen some people like MM with very normal siblings.
@neighborhoodcatlady60942 жыл бұрын
Interesting little known fact about her that I learned from Lady C. Wallis’ first husband was abusive. When she informed her rich uncle that she wanted to divorce him, he told her that if she divorced him, he would disinherit her. She divorced her husband and 6 months later, her uncle died leaving her nothing.
@fadecutmike2 жыл бұрын
Well at least he gave her a heads up before hand.
@whalefuhk2 жыл бұрын
Then she became a Nazi sympathizer. Disgusting
@grimslade02 жыл бұрын
I bet he was like: "hehe!! I really got her good. What's she going to amount to now, without me?"
@h0rriphic2 жыл бұрын
@@grimslade0 lololol
@grimslade02 жыл бұрын
@@h0rriphic 👁️👄👁️🖤
@possumaintdead2 жыл бұрын
Love the clever way you paired the photos with their similar outfits. Great comparison, thanks!
@barbaras67922 жыл бұрын
Edward was an awful person, so also was Wallis. Wallis, though, for all her faults, never behaved as badly and disrespectfully, as that dreadful Duchess of Sussex woman is behaving now.
@kitchenskills54272 жыл бұрын
I beg to differ. Have you not seen the picture of Wallis posing with Adolf Hitler? They traveled to Germany against the objections of British officials shortly after their marriage. There are allegations that Wallis also had an affair with Nazi Joseph von Ribbentrop and there are even accusations that she passed along secrets to the Nazis.
@bb12752 жыл бұрын
Prince Andrew has an obsession with teddy bears allegedly, as well. Odd.
@animula69082 жыл бұрын
Teddy bears are cute. Of all the things you can hate about these guys, this isn’t on the top ten list of reasons.
@mikahong2 жыл бұрын
@@animula6908 teddy bears tend to be associated w children and if you know what else Andrew is fond of...
@cheryllee52622 жыл бұрын
Ol' Randy Andy.
@TheCardiffgirl2 жыл бұрын
Just one point. The royal family didn,t force out Edward and Wallis, the church and government did. Being king was the last thing the queens` dad wanted. The royal family didn,t force out Harry and Meghan, they did it themselves.
@md28stads2 жыл бұрын
Meagan is basically a modern Wallace and yet still somehow less likeable than Wallace 😂 As doc Grande says, Wallace was actually very intelligent and never played the victim rather she was insightful and kept a low profile (read, wasn't seeking fame like Meagan).
@wendigo19192 жыл бұрын
I don't know... I'm not too fond of Nazi sympathizers, which Wallace and the Duke both were.
@rebeccaliew22472 жыл бұрын
In our time today, where there is no Adolf Hitler to worry about, Meghan's arrogance & lack of insight, yet keep rubbing into our faces her victim status is our torn in the flesh. But to those living in WW2 time, understandably, Wallis & Edward as would be hated then.
@Swansong3212 жыл бұрын
@wendigo1919 ...yeah not many people are fond of Nazi sympathisers!..but I'm also not too fond of these modern day race baiters..
@jadepaulsen84562 жыл бұрын
No. Not a " modern" wallace. There is no comparison other than they both married losers of a royal ( pufuckinpuleeez) family. Zero sympathies for either couple.
@robertandhollyscorpiofan26972 жыл бұрын
@@rebeccaliew2247 ‘….no adolf hitler to worry about….’ Back in 2016, there was. When he was campaigning, t.Rump talked several times about ‘rounding up all the disabled people in the u.s., and putting them in a concentration camp, the same way hitler did with the Jews.’ As a disabled person, I immediately contacted several friends, who agreed to do whatever was necessary for as long as needed to keep me safe.
@newenglandcoast71212 жыл бұрын
Loved this, as always. We need an entire book of your hilarious, tongue-in-cheek "one liners", you are the master!! 😜
@bthomson Жыл бұрын
I like the fact that they are thinly distributed. They are the levening rather than the main ingredient!
@brigittebeltran6701 Жыл бұрын
I see many parallels...many. Especially social climbing. Brilliant analysis once again from Dr. Grande!
@helpyourcattodrive2 жыл бұрын
Let’s do this! It’s Grande time. Yes. Great topic … it’ll be interesting to hear what Grande has to say about her.
@rosaliewessell50762 жыл бұрын
0p hello Google this is voice typing what would you like me to say
@snow9992 жыл бұрын
So impressed with the photos of the two women wearing similar clothing. I can imagine you thinking “hot Damn” whenever you found a great match 😂
@melteddarkchocolate0002 жыл бұрын
"Bring the police and the firemen!...Don't believe me just watch!"
@roslyncampbell78162 жыл бұрын
MM also copies Diana by wearing similar outfits.
@janedoe52292 жыл бұрын
@@roslyncampbell7816 Dressing like a princess does not make one a true princess. One has to have a heart of a princess, which means having a heart of compassion for others. Megan does not have that.
@MrsRitchieBlackmore2 жыл бұрын
MM's copycat tendencies are creepy AF. They show the IMMENSE amount of thought and planning she puts into every appearance. And the fact that she often copies individuals who were once close to Harry, like Diana, Kate Middleton and even Chelsy Davy, shows she has a very CLEAR and very weird agenda.
@amyharriet53682 жыл бұрын
@@alternateangel but the white belted garment was eerily identical. I can imagine "the firm" behind the royal family directing a stylist to do this without Meghan being much aware at the time...
@terrimitchell56162 жыл бұрын
You matched up their dresses! Wow! I loved this. Deliciously dry & a little snarky! Perfect (as always)! 🤣🥰
@annanikia79492 жыл бұрын
Very good presentation Dr. G. I knew the story of Wallis but enjoyed the comparison to MM. Your witty humor always provides an entertaining flair!
@mistibarbee80432 жыл бұрын
When Edward abdicated, England dodged a bullet. When Megxit occurred, England dodged another one. In both cases the trash took itself out.
@hhspore Жыл бұрын
Dr Grande, this is a really entertaining video. I love that you talk about the "suitcase handling test" with such a straight face. Kudos !
@549BR2 жыл бұрын
Wallace's uncle was the President of the Seaboard Airline railroad company and made his winter home in Palm Beach available to Wallace and her husband. The railroad planned to build a number of swank hotels along its route to attract day travelers (much like the Harvey Houses along the old Santa Fe railroad) who could deboard the train in the evening and resume their travels the next day. One of these still exists in Indiantown, Florida and is operated as the Seminole Inn. The ex-King and Wallace, accompanied by Wallace's uncle, frequently visited at that hotel when in Florida, and went on hunting trips in the rural area. It's alleged that they were always tailed by the FBI as Hoover was of the belief that the ex-King was a German spy.
@xx39202 жыл бұрын
Interesting story, thanks for posting. :-)
@gloriamontgomery69002 жыл бұрын
Well, he may have been right about that.
@NotChefCook2 жыл бұрын
Well- Edward was certainly a Nazi SYMPATHIZER ...Wallis too .
@karobythell44252 жыл бұрын
Fascinating , thanks !
@bmwspirit2 жыл бұрын
I thought the uncle died 6months later after Wallace divorced her first husband 🤔🤔🤔
@ExTeachersClub2 жыл бұрын
Interesting thoughts. One of the main stumbling blocks to her marriage to Edward VIII and becoming Queen for Wallis was the fact that she was divorced. The King was Head of the Church of England and at the time it was unthinkable that the Queen would be a divorcee. Meghan was very fortunate to be married at Windsor. Princess Anne (as a divorcee) was married in Scotland where the rules were different. I think you are right…Meghan has no idea how privileged she was and how rules were relaxed for them
@laurenmay20982 жыл бұрын
The rules were relaxed for Charles, then they took it advantage of it.
@catrionamacfarlane49492 жыл бұрын
@@laurenmay2098 Charles was not married to Camilla in a church....they had a Civil ceremony followed by a Blesssing...which is acceptable for couples when one, or both are divorced.
@cyrilmarasigan71082 жыл бұрын
She should be greatful that the RF accept her but she still screwed it up
@laurenmay20982 жыл бұрын
@@catrionamacfarlane4949 where were they married? What building was that? Tell me please!
@deborahwesselman8452 жыл бұрын
@@laurenmay2098 I don't know the name or address of the building where Charles was married. But it was the very same building ie office where ordinary British citizens are married when they don't want a church wedding, or like Charles can't marry in the Church of England
@danilincks58092 жыл бұрын
Always spot on and not afraid of saying what needs to be said. Thanks for your great work and despite having so many subscribers, still taking your time to read the comments and interact with us. You’re awesome Dr. Grande!
@wigglebolt40792 жыл бұрын
Oooo this was a good video (as always). Meghan isn’t even up to par with Wallis…Meghan is so out of touch with modern womanhood. I am a wife, I work full time, have 2 kids and take college courses, so to hear her making so much money off of the drivel she calls a podcast is off putting. She’s not ambitious, she’s just a fairly attractive woman who social climbed with much success.
@toomanymarys73552 жыл бұрын
Wallis was a literal Nazi. Lol. Campaigned for eugenics. Hilarious.
@catherineenglish95422 жыл бұрын
You are a super girl !! Hats off to you ambitious woman !!
@elainewilliams50192 жыл бұрын
Well now Megan Markle will be a talk show host. Megan keeps getting promoted. With Jimmy Fallon.
@kiangee12 күн бұрын
"fairly attractive" you must be joking She's ugly as hell if not for the expensive make over. In her younger days photos she was such a plain jane no one will notice, until she became actress and had a major make over. Now she has more money and more reason to fix her looks. Comparing her to Wallis Simpson is an insult to Wallis. Wallis wasnt't good looking but she had unique look and style. Wallis never criticized the RF, she had grace. Meghan married a spare believing she should inherit the royal kingdom wholesale.
@judithmanderson4312 жыл бұрын
Excellent comparison. Loved your final analysis.
@carlyrennae39632 жыл бұрын
I love how much you point out how much Megan loves herself and is soooooo out of touch.....except when holding brief cases ahahahaha gold ❤️
@sharynkoren20542 жыл бұрын
Amazing Megan wore a dress for the Oprah interview with chicken shit on the shoulder. Wallis wore a similar dress
@littleeva2 жыл бұрын
I don't think anything is wrong with a Black woman, even a biracial Black woman loving herself, especially since we've been taught that we shouldn't love ourselves.
@cyrilmarasigan71082 жыл бұрын
@@littleeva Wrong, it's alright to love yourself but loving yourself to the point that you lied, you haved a worst behaviour, and copies everything, playes victim and isolate your husband and children to the relatives and disrespwcting others doesn't include on loving yourself list
@thehoneyeffect2 жыл бұрын
@@littleeva Regardless of whatever you say, racist white supremacist, misogynistic people will never like a Mixed Race woman marrying into white royalty, they have a delusional sense of superiority.
@MedusasFeelinSalty2 жыл бұрын
Loving yourself and being "in love with yourself" or self obsessed, are different things. Loving yourself is a beautiful thing. MM has got the other two things going on, and has the need for everyone else to be pulled into her delusion.
@carolinependleton84452 жыл бұрын
I think your analysis was spot on and as witty as always,shame Meghan and Harry couldn't follow the example of the the Windsors and keep quiet in the background.
@user-tz3ow4xo4d2 жыл бұрын
They were nazi sympathizers though😭
@reneedaughter2 жыл бұрын
The Windsors were not quiet at all. There is so much literature on them, for reference, and the things they did/said was enough to make your hair gray.
@Meenadevidasi2 жыл бұрын
Wow. I learn so much about human nature, history, and indescribable levels of awareness from your presentations. You have to be empowered somehow. Your graphics are awesome.
@nickb44102 жыл бұрын
I love the humor you put in your videos. That deal or no deal joke was great 👍
@Spoiledstoic2 жыл бұрын
Thank you Dr Grande for posting great content so consistently!
@streaming53322 жыл бұрын
The other difference is Harry is not the future king.
@thelocalmaladroit88732 жыл бұрын
From what I’ve read, you are correct that Wallis was not happy especially living in exile. Sad love story Doc. Your comparisons to MM are spot on. The new graphic style is great!
@helengorton8942 жыл бұрын
Excellent! Thank you
@christygyeke47882 жыл бұрын
I love the new graphic style
@ullija2 жыл бұрын
Wallis did actual charity work on the Bahamas (Red Cross). Megsie, by contrast, just parades for photo-ops and leaves the actual work to others.
@MasterMalrubius2 жыл бұрын
There seems to be a bit of narcissistic tendencies in both cases. Each shows a bit of wanting to do whatever they feel like at the expense of those around them.
@dlmsarge83292 жыл бұрын
Dr. G !!!! Good lord!! What a masterful piling on of icy burn after icy burn! This was really excellent! Thanks for the laughs
@carolyngenc53292 жыл бұрын
Several things you left out, probably because constraints of time. Edward gave Wallis jewelry which the Royal family considered to be owned by the Crown. On a visit to as country house in England, Wallis ' jewelry was stolen. Many thought the royals were getting their property back. Ernest Simpson was married at the time he took up with Wallis. He was complicit in the divorce from Wallis. He stayed in a seaside hotel with a woman who called herself "Buttercup Kennedy.". The staff of the hotel testified on Wallis' behalf that they were seen in bed together. "Buttercup," is thought to be Mary Kirk Raffray ( Of the Kirk silver company) who was a classmate of Wallis' at Oldfield school. She became Ernest's third wife. There is actually much, much more of interest.
@sarahhayse-gregson6892 жыл бұрын
More on the jewellery, Wallis still had a king’s ransom of jewels and in her will they were to be auctioned off and proceeds to go to various charities. Among those that were sold were property of the Crown and were meant to be handed back. There was a scandal about the proceeds as great portions disappeared. I saw the catalog and there were stunning pieces.
@dukeofhaas2 жыл бұрын
@@sarahhayse-gregson689 We're eager for you to identify just one piece of jewelry belonging to the British royal family that Edward allegedly gave to his wife. It is our understanding that Edward gave Wallis new and bespoke haute joaillerie crafted by Cartier and others. Perhaps you are conflating Wallis' jewels with the famous Cambridge emeralds that Queen Mary's representatives retrieved from Nellie Kilmorey.
@dukeofhaas2 жыл бұрын
Please identify just one jewel owned by the British royal family that Edward allegedly gave to Wallis. Those possessing significant knowledge concerning royal jewels understand that Edward gave Wallis new and bespoke jewels made by important haute joaillerie houses of the time such as Cartier. Perhaps you confuse Edward's jewels with the famous Cambridge emeralds that for a brief period did end up in the hands of Nellie Kilmorey, the nonroyal mistress of Francis of Teck. But Edward's mum - Queen Mary - got her emeralds back rather quickly.
@sarahhayse-gregson6892 жыл бұрын
@@dukeofhaas in 2019, Lady Pamela Hicks along with her daughter, India had made a podcast and one of the subjects was the feud between Lord Mountbatten and The Duchess of Windsor regarding some pieces that he said should have been returned. His battle took up with Suzanne Blum, Wallis lawyer who had power of attorney, as Wallis was declining in mental health. Blum was the one, on instructions, to auction off all the jewels and unfortunately, Lord Louis was killed in the IRA attack on his boat before anything could be resolved. I agree that Wallis’ persons jewellery, fashioned by Appel’s and Van Clef and Cartier were commissioned by the Duke. There’s still the mystery surrounding the “ missing” jewels and I guess we’ll never know as the people involved are all deceased.
@dukeofhaas2 жыл бұрын
@@sarahhayse-gregson689 Thank you for your kind reply. However, we're still awaiting the identification of even one jewel in Wallis's possession that once belonged to the British royal family. It is my contention that no such jewel - or jewels - can be found because they do not exist. As with most European royal houses, the House of Windsor takes their personal possessions quite seriously, and at the top of that pile are their personal jewels (as opposed to those jewels considered Crown property). Finally, in the podcast you mentioned, Lady Hicks discussed how her father believed that following his abdication Edward took with him to France several elaborate presentation boxes. You - and others - have no doubt mistakenly conflated these "jeweled boxes" with actual pieces of wearable jewelry, the latter being the objects most associated with the style and memory of the late Duchess of Windsor. Over the decades Wallis' reputation has been tarnished in so many ways, so please, let's not add possession of stolen goods to this list.
@pj1012 жыл бұрын
I always got interested about this couple. Thank you for the analysis!
@antoinettamason85572 жыл бұрын
I'd be interested in you analysing the men - Edward and Harry. I believe they both wanted to be free of the Royal Family's constraints, whilst not being completely able to give up its privileges - and, frankly, being weak, institutionalised individuals, lacking in the intelligence or fortitude to go their own way. I think they have both consciencly or sub-consciencly chosen partners who would dominate them and do the break away job for them. However, marrying someone for the spurious reasons does not a happy life make - as is being played out now with the Sussexes, and was played out in the past with the Windsors. I think the main characteristic of them both is lack of intelligence, personal weakness and lack of control over their destinies, leading them to go down the metaphorical Molotov cocktail route in their marriages rather than work things out from within. Harry knows what the British press is like, he would have known they would be on the look out for any reason to splash him and his bride all over the front pages for negative reasons. I'm not surprised the Windsors courted Hitler. He would have dismantled the Royal Family and all its courtiers (much like the civil service in Parliament, these anonymous, grey men are probably the real power in the monarchy) installed the Windsors as monarchs, and the latter would have believed they could then have complete control over a re-vamped institution. They'd have been wrong of course, they would just have been pawns in the games of a different set of grey men.
@Loki-ko2mq2 жыл бұрын
Perfectly stated and oh so true!
@yvettemarshallTWN2 жыл бұрын
Very astute. Also, shows we never learn a thing from history.
@lindaolsen70892 жыл бұрын
Well said, Antoinetta Mason. Both men, having been "institutionalized" from childhood by the unusual strictures and protocols of the British Monarchy, also found it comforting that they found women who would direct and instruct them. This was a comfort to them which they viewed as an "independent, American spirit" in the women they loved. In reality, sometimes people who have that same "independent, American spirit" are really controlling or manipulative as well, with a sense of entitlement. I believe those types of qualities are shared by Wallis and Meghan, as well as being well known now just by their first names and because of the men they were able to control and ultimately destroy.
@annanikia79492 жыл бұрын
Great idea!
@yvettemarshallTWN2 жыл бұрын
@@lindaolsen7089 It would be interesting to hear about “the other side” of these fascinating personages! Unyielding tradition (known as the hierophant in metaphysical circles) continues to oppress, even those born of it! Seems to me that Mrs. Simpson is the one who got destroyed in the first scenario even though it appeared that she and her duke were perfectly paired in their ambitions and beliefs, but most definitely Prince Harry got the short end of the pairing between him and his duchess, a ruined individual at the outset. Dominant to the point where her name is spoken before his! Usurper, but I guess that is the price of his so-called “freedom” from well, control and dominance by his lineage. Wow. Consequences. Everyone thinks on what they can gain from a situation, but hardly ever what they can lose! Wonder if PH thinks it has all been worth it?
@tampablaine2 жыл бұрын
I love the new format of showing larger pictures of the subject.
@kerstinklenovsky2392 жыл бұрын
If I were an obnoxious freak of relative renown, I would be really worried to have Dr Grande tell me his ideas about me. He is so good at what he does! 👀😳
@zenawarrior74422 жыл бұрын
Interesting analysis. Hilarious quip about Meghan thinking she's queen of the world 🌎🤣👑 Thanks Dr G💛💛
@barbo11062 жыл бұрын
🤣😂👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
@cottontails90032 жыл бұрын
Hello my friend, your comment is so spot on. I hope you and your mum had a great Birthday 😘❤💙💙🎁🎂🍷🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷
@zenawarrior74422 жыл бұрын
@@cottontails9003 Hello friend😁💌. We did have a great bday thanks!! Been a 16 hr day so heading to bed. Always love hearing from you ❤😉❤. Message soon....🤗💜💜🎂🌜⭐🎉🎈🎁⚘and thanks for the compliment on my comment 👍💚💚
@cottontails90032 жыл бұрын
@@zenawarrior7442 You always give great and informative comments . Have a good sleep and beautiful dreams. 😘😴❤💙💚💖✉🎋🎋🌷🌷🌷
@rupatiwari59232 жыл бұрын
She really thinks she's Queen...and remember just a plane crash away 🙄 😑
@danielintheantipodes67412 жыл бұрын
They were all four of them dreadful people. I give credit to Mrs Simpson for sparing us what would have been the debacle of King Edward VIII. In contrast, Harry functioned well as a second son. I can forgive them anything except slandering Prince Charles while simultaeously complaining that he was not throwing money at them. And when he has a $40m inheritance. And when they live in a palace in California. Complaining that they do not want to be royal anymore is all very well but you have to stop living like a royal if it is not in your price range!
@laurenmay20982 жыл бұрын
That people probably didn't talk it about the royals not even alone at their home. At some point he accepted he wasn't going to go back to England. And I believe he thought he could shares his popularity with his brother, he was likeable, his brother not much. At that point Churchill was not having his craziness.
@merrywalsh28092 жыл бұрын
This ☝🏼☝🏼☝🏼
@dandrummond91542 жыл бұрын
Meghan Markle should be paying you for advertising. I forget she exists every time until you bring her back up.
@barrettlori92492 жыл бұрын
WOW! All That's Relevant in a Nut Shell ! 👍 Nice Work! ✌️🇨🇦
@shannashutterfly68062 жыл бұрын
Very interesting. I love your dry humour!
@jacksonjones31522 жыл бұрын
Rumor has it is was actually his close personal ties to the Nazi's that was more problematic.
@woodenseagull18992 жыл бұрын
She slept with all the top Nazis. She was known as the " Nazi bike ".
@cottontails90032 жыл бұрын
I thought it was the Prime Minister at that time ?Chamberlain.
@jillmartin2322 жыл бұрын
It isn't rumor, but an actual fact. Many documents were found decades ago, stating his plans and coercion with Hitler and his party. Quite shocking really. It always seemed unbelievable that he left for 'love.' Turns out to be true, he was a traitor and Wallis was a convenient ruse to use for his de-throning. Feel that there were similar things going on with Harry. His behavior has not changed; petulance, jealousy, personality disorders, etc, the RF just did a magnificent job of covering them up.
@May-qb3vx2 жыл бұрын
Yep. My British history prof told us that Churchill had so much concern that they would undermine the cause against Hitler that he immediately got Edward a governorship in the Bahamas to get him out of the way. Churchill became PM in 1940; Edward became governor of the Bahamas in 1940. I don’t think that’s a coincidence.
@May-qb3vx2 жыл бұрын
@@cottontails9003 chamberlain was a problem but not because he liked Hitler. He seriously misjudged Hitler and adopted appeasement to try to keep peace in Europe (no one wanted WWII after the destruction of WWI) so he bent over backwards to try to keep that from happening. Chamberlain was almost always flying to the continent to talk to Hitler and he always thought Hitler was telling him the truth when he said that all he wanted was to reunite the ethnic Germans. But alas, he was swindled big time. But he was not a Nazi sympathizer as Edward was. He was simply too gullible to serve as an effective war-time PM.
@johnscales2062 жыл бұрын
I am delighted you made this video. I was hoping you would do this. Thank you. I watch your clips on a daily basis
@michelebrowne4182 жыл бұрын
It’s always amazed me that Harry never seems to have learned anything from his own family history, and I don’t mean Diana. No, his great grand uncle (I think I got that right) David, the former Edward VIII. David was exiled from Great Britain once he abdicated, which he was quite surprised about as he thought he would be welcomed as a senior advisor to his brother the King. Now Harry has effectively exiled himself with his criticism of his family. I wonder how Harry will view his life 10-20 years from now when he is as isolated and rootless as his great uncle. Another sad footnote to history.
@laurenmay20982 жыл бұрын
Omg, in 10 years they will be doing exactly what Simpson and David did, going to parties and vacations invited by people whom just wanted fo be associated with them because of their titles. They deserve it, I do not pity them.
@cyrilmarasigan71082 жыл бұрын
@@laurenmay2098 The problem was ALL who supported them were paid to support them and also High society in America probably also blocked them from their invitation list because they know that Meg might use it in headlines when they only want was to party
@musicandbooklover-p2o2 жыл бұрын
In Harry's case I think he honestly believed his mum when she told him that he would be a sort of co-regent to William, a close advisor and trusted confidente. Must have shaken him when he discovered that him mum was wrong and it wasn't going a be a sort of unofficial dual kingship, possibly where the problems first began.
@Manseb2 жыл бұрын
The stakes were different. Edward was literally the King of England and at that time the British Empire was much bigger and more powerful. Whether Harry stayed or left England, all he would have done was turn up at different events and shine a spotlight on things via official engagements.
@michelebrowne4182 жыл бұрын
@@musicandbooklover-p2o Interesting, Karen! I never knew this, but it certainly adds up. I think Diana (a prize winning manipulator herself) was probably pushing that “Us against the world” view that Harry has fallen for with M. Could we say that Diana had “groomed” (unintentionally I hope) Harry for the situation he finds himself in now?
@KateEleanor2 жыл бұрын
Fascinating Dr Grande. Thank you for all the time you have clearly taken to research this interesting case of compare and contrast.
@Deedster562 жыл бұрын
Dr. Grande, I always look forward to your analyses and this one was absolutely brilliant! Your insight is second-to-none and your well thought-out research combined with your incomparable wit make this THE best channel on KZbin! A big thank you from Canada ❤️🇨🇦
@higgaroc2 жыл бұрын
Turning in to sleep and finding a Dr. G video is such a treat! The parallels between these two couples is quite fascinating. I wonder if you could also do an analysis of Camilla Parker Bowles. I’m curious about her personality, which has consumed so much of Prince Charles’s attention for so long, to the detriment of his own children via their mother.
@chrissiebabe2342 жыл бұрын
Waking up and finding a new Dr. G video is, too! 🤩
@fludderkiddie2 жыл бұрын
I was going to ask the same
@jeanm95212 жыл бұрын
Would love to see your opinion on her also!
@daphnegeorge74812 жыл бұрын
People who meet/ know Camilla say she's lovely and that she and Charles are happy and well suited. Charles' first marriage was not a success. He is hardly the first person to get a divorce. Move on!
@hell-o-kitty19762 жыл бұрын
@kat hi kat, based on your statement, what charles did, ie depending on C for emotional support was unwisely. His actions have had a devastating affect on everyone . A bit selfish 😕. The butterfly effect
@missrose19832 жыл бұрын
Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor went to France and had dinner with the Windsors a few times, Richard said Wallis was one of most vulgar women he had ever met. I saw this on a documentary about the Windsors.
@marisapaola90102 жыл бұрын
The Windsor's had a very peculiar private life and parties.
@brentwood13342 жыл бұрын
@@marisapaola9010 she had affairs with younger men until she was too old
@TheAnubis572 жыл бұрын
Richard Burton observation falls in line with Wallis's life as really a trashy person but had some public composure rather than Megan.
@missrose19832 жыл бұрын
@@TheAnubis57 Agree.
@sharonlegaux19042 жыл бұрын
Oh, yes and Richard Burton was expert, he was a drunk, took another man's wife Eddie Fisher, and Elizabeth was no saint she was married 8 times, yes let us all listen to his opinion.
@dianacooper-havlik41152 жыл бұрын
Nobody does it better than you, Dr Grande. ✨
@fabulousnewt7702 жыл бұрын
Wallace had class..she was intelligent and by all accounts good company and an excellent hostess. She never publicly tried to shame the Royal family.
@deejames1st2 жыл бұрын
Agreed. She accomplices her hubby to meet him. But other then that didn’t really do anything. Nutmeg on the hand, is attempting to make a career out of it due to a lack of talent elsewhere
@fabulousnewt7702 жыл бұрын
@@angelaringrose7530 that's not shaming the Royal family tho. Shes not telling lies and issuing thinly disguised threats.
@cindybogart60622 жыл бұрын
I know this will be good! Thanks Dr. Grande. I could not agree with you more about the Sussex’s being a noisier version of the Windsor’s.
@susanmorano4052 жыл бұрын
With a whole lot less charm too.
@rockthecasbah64502 жыл бұрын
My understanding from what I have read or watched documentary of Wallis was, she was willing to be the mistress, with all the privileges and trimmings for being a royal mistress. It was Edward that couldn't bear the thought of not making her his Queen.
@browniehendricks37262 жыл бұрын
Spot on
@Grimenoughtomaketherobotcry Жыл бұрын
Determined to make an honest woman out of her...
@susanmorano4052 жыл бұрын
Putting aside the personality and characters of Edward and Wallis, Dr Grande didn't make clear: 1) Edward was very likely sexually, and definitely was physically, abused as a very young child. 2) Edward did not want to maintain Wallis as a mistress. He was, in his way, completely devoted to her, and, even in prior relationships, was "settled down" - he wanted a marriage. 3) yes, it's true that Edward basically manipulated Wallis to a point where she would have utterly humiliated him in the eyes of the whole world if she didn't end up marrying him. She did NOT want to be Queen. She would have been happy as mistress & she didn't believe, or push, that she should marry "the King"- her letters to her aunt and to Ernest Simpson pre-divorce, prove this. 4) they WANTED to live in England postwar. They wanted royal work - appearances & so on. It was the old royal family that kept their resentment of the abdication at high boil, and would not allow this. Yes, living in France was both rent & tax free. They were both somewhat pennypinching, so the fact that the French govt offered this, wasn't turned down- and who wouldn't live rent & tax free if it's *offered*. 5) finally - everyone forgets in the rush to escervate Wallis, but she did Great Britain a *massive* favor by being "the woman he loved" and abdicated for. They were most certainly flawed people, but if you look into their lives (I mean really read, and more than a Wikipedia page) you will find that their childhoods scarred them both deeply. Edward, from abuse and horrible parenting; Wallis, from a lack of money and security from the instant her father died. (And her first marriage was also abusive.)
@deborahwesselman8452 жыл бұрын
Hadn't heard anything about Edward possibly having been sexually and physically abused.. where did that come from?
@bthomson Жыл бұрын
"Eviscerate? "
@christyb29122 жыл бұрын
Bravo for your researchers putting together the pictures of Wallis and Meghan - so similar!
@lddixon23942 жыл бұрын
This was fascinating. Thank you. Time spent listening to you, Dr Grande, is never wasted.
@christinejoy30302 жыл бұрын
Great video. Very interesting and well researched. I love your sense of humour and brilliant sarcasm. Just subscribed!
@niki26302 жыл бұрын
im loving this series by Dr. Grande. Always spot on analysis with humor ! Thank you
@Sergeant_Fury2 жыл бұрын
My mother was of that generation of English school girls who had a crush on the Prince of Wales. When the Wallis Simpson scandal broke in the UK, King Edward VIII was dubbed "the second mate to an American destroyer."
@deborahwesselman8452 жыл бұрын
Well put..
@ladydamiana68412 жыл бұрын
Actually, the phrase was "third mate on an American tramp,"
@Sergeant_Fury2 жыл бұрын
@@ladydamiana6841 Interesting. My version is what my Poor Dear Sainted Mother told me, but I'm sure there were variations on the theme. I suppose that explaining what a "tramp" was to a sheltered English school girl was a little awkward in 1936.
@ladydamiana68412 жыл бұрын
@@Sergeant_Fury I imagine ALL of it was difficult to explain to young ladies of that era who were brought up to be less, er, notorious. I could see "third mate on an American destroyer" (since Edward was her third husband); I don't know how "second mate" could work unless maybe it was a reference to Edward being the second man in Wallis and Ernest's marriage.
@messrsandersonco59852 жыл бұрын
As an ancient Brit, I can tell you that Wallis was despised mainly because she was American, partly because she was divorced, and partly because of her personality and vain ambition. She was also the FIRST. Trust me, the best thing Edward ever did for Britain was abdicate because Elizabeth ascended to the throne and she has maintained old values such as service to the country. This was apparent during the Blitz in WWII. Elizabeth stayed in London. Can you imagine this dysfunctional and self-serving couple doing anything like that? 🤔
@edronc20072 жыл бұрын
Princess Elizabeth was a minor at that time. Her parents did, she had no choice.
@grioulaloula85942 жыл бұрын
@@edronc2007 Exactly. FYI…There are photos of Elizabeth and her sister doing the one armed salute.
@laurasibley88922 жыл бұрын
Thanks Dr Grande. I've been waiting for this comparison and contrast and you haven't disappointed.
@DE-xt7jv2 жыл бұрын
You forgot the bit where she was wooed by von ribbentrop, and there 'royal' tour of Germany in 1938
@bambiginger2 жыл бұрын
Oh excellent subject, Dr. G! Thanks for the upload, I was so happy to see it pop up!
@Flamsterette2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the upload while I'm at a brewery celebrating my friend's 41st birthday!
@AngelinaX232 жыл бұрын
I always appreciate your extra dry sense of humor. The photos that accompanied think analysis were perfect.
@estebanmartin172 Жыл бұрын
Don’t forget Meghan’s half-brother: Thomas Markle Jr. I heard an interview of him where he said he was preparing a documentary of his own, with all sorts of videos of Meghan, to prove she DID grow up with a dad and siblings in her life.
@windywednesday4166 Жыл бұрын
Yes he is! Also, I don't think the lawsuit is about Megan saying she's an only child. I think it's about the revelations that came out about her helping with the book "Finding Freedom". Megan was telling the author to put in that Samantha's children are all from different fathers and they were all taken away from her... really nasty.
@leslieannvanhumbeck76302 жыл бұрын
I feel sorry 😞 for Wallus. Imagine living the last six years of your life without a single visitor. So sad. Harry and Edward both seem extremely immature.
@moonchild70332 жыл бұрын
Very interesting & love your witty analysis! 👏👏
@przejebanalaska2 жыл бұрын
Teddy bear collection of Edward reminds me of Prince Andrew and his collection of teddy bears.
@LINDA-oi4mt Жыл бұрын
I got so focused on everyone's gracious words to Ms. Mary that I had to start the Dr.'s video over. You were. All so kind and....just lovely lovely comments. 🥂
@Kinypshun2 жыл бұрын
Great analysis over Sunday morning coffee. Thank you for the great content!
@AlpineRuin2 жыл бұрын
Great clip! Astute package, as always. It's great to see a little bit of new editing too! Thanks, doc!
@l-train78762 жыл бұрын
I love your MM videos, Dr. Grande!!
@tessygeimer-biver34232 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for another well-informed and reflected video. Your lucid mind and witty humour restore faith in humanity and make human folly so much more bearable. Keep on being a beacon of common sense and intelligence ❤
@veronicatrejo5979 Жыл бұрын
Great analysis Dr.Grande. I enjoy watching your videos and have learned quite a bit from them.
@sophiamac91002 жыл бұрын
EXCELLENT analysis!!! Your subtle nuances about Megain are quite astute!